Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The major steps involved in the effective communication process are Sender,
Message, Encoding, Communication Channel, Receiver, Decoding and Feedback.
Sender:
The person who intends to convey the message with the intention of passing
information and ideas to others is known as sender or communicator.
Message:
This is the subject matter of the communication. This may be an opinion, attitude,
feelings, views, orders, or suggestions.
Encoding:
Since the subject matter of communication is theoretical and intangible, its further
passing requires use of certain symbols such as words, actions or pictures etc.
Conversion of subject matter into these symbols is the process of encoding.
Communication Channel:
The person who is interested in communicating has to choose the channel for
sending the required information, ideas etc. This information is transmitted to the
receiver through certain channels which may be either formal or informal.
Receiver:
Receiver is the person who receives the message or for whom the message is meant
for. It is the receiver who tries to understand the message in the best possible
manner in achieving the desired objectives.
Decoding:
The person who receives the message or symbol from the communicator tries to
convert the same in such a way so that he may extract its meaning to his complete
understanding.
Feedback:
Feedback is the process of ensuring that the receiver has received the message and
understood in the same sense as sender meant it.
Training for skills has become much more complex, with the excess of
training products and methods being available in the Talent
development space. Gone are those days when the only skills training
methodology used to be vastly Instructor led, using an AV or two,
followed by a role-play session, and a couple of training games. Suddenly
the learners had to form an ad hoc task groups to create innumerable
presentations, while the winning team used to be rewarded with a box
of chocolate, during those days.
The challenges witnessed in assessing skills development in non-formal
training sessions are:
Since non-formal training sessions don't necessarily lead to a
certification, to measure the training effectiveness becomes a
major challenge.
These days, lot of learnings are gamified (websites like mindtickle,
meadiaspark, articulate), naturally the skilling happened, or not
happened during the session can be felt by the candidate, resulting
into unchanged skill level affecting stakeholder relationship.
Skills like Team-bonding are many a times facilitated with activities
like 'Battle Simulation', river rafting, tug of war. It's been observed
with various groups, that immediately post activity, the
participants have gone back to their natural style of working in silo.
Even while administering assessment tools to check skill levels, the
facilitators find people behaving the ideal way during the skill audit,
& move back to their original skill levels afterwards.
The audience, at times has learned to tweak the Skill test results by
judging the ideal answer from their previous learning experiences,
leading to incorrect assessments.
Today's workforce is much smarter. They're hand-picked by the
Companies after rounds of interviews, equipped with smartphones and
laptops, well-informed; by courtesy the internet, & media, & well paid.
Now, the functions like Sales, Operations, Product research &
development, HR/OD, & Finance offer tremendous learning
opportunities to hone the necessary skills. Trainings are done in-house
by a team of specialists, or outsourced to the Training Consultants. A
thorough Training Need Analysis gets done with every concerned
individual, includes a lot of assessment tools; like, Kenexa, Lumina Spark,
DISC, HR Chally, MBTI, et al. These tools give the training facilitators, a
clear idea about their Personality portrait including overextended
persona, Leadership & learning styles (both natural and adopted).
For a training facilitator, it becomes crucial to do a lot of background
preparation for the audience. For a functional team, it's becoming
impossible these days to absent themselves for an entire day's work
dedicated to classroom training. Thus, skills training is becoming more
segmented, social, experiential (best practice sharing), and less formal.
To assess the skills during a training session, instead of putting them
through a questionnaire, it's easier for all if they go through a simulator.
It can be a shared case study, enacted by the teams, instead of a scripted
role-play.
Various functions go through skilling in business communication, in
negotiating with clients or stake holders (both internal & external), in
presentation & analytic skills, in conflict management, team-bonding,
coaching & selling skills. The Facilitator should allow the participants to
acquire skills by sharing amongst themselves, instead of putting in a lot
of training content, the facilitator needs to bring out the best from the
candidate, during the session.
Social media can also be utilized to train or assess skills. The concerned
participant or the facilitator can put up a question for a peer group,
which can be answered by any one. Once it becomes a discussion-thread,
the comments start attracting different and intelligent viewpoints.
Nowadays, to assess skills, there are different IT platforms available.
From Companies like Microsoft, SAP, Callidus, Atos, there are good
number of Sales Performance Management, & coaching tools are readily
available. And, to know the current skill level of diverse teams, the good
old Mystery shopping technique is a must inclusion to any Skills
development assessment program.