A STUDY ON TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT AMONG EMPLOYEES

WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO AMMAN SPINNING MILLS,

POLLACHI

Submitted by
C.M.SIVA KUMAR
(Reg No: 16 PW 13)

Under the guidance of

Ms.T. SIVARANJANE.,M.S.W.,M.Phil

A PROJECT REPORT
Submitted to the
P.G.DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WORK
NALLAMUTHU GOUNDER MAHALINGAM COLLEGE
(An Autonomous College Affiliated to Bharathiar University)
Re Accredited with ‘A’ Grade by NAAC
An ISO 9001:2015 Certified Institution
POLLACHI – 642 001

APRIL – 2018
 NALLAMUTHU GOUNDER MAHALINGAM COLLEGE
(An autonomous College Affiliated to Bharathiar University)

Re Accredited with ‘A’ Grade by NAAC

An ISO 9001:2015 certified Institution

POLLACHI-642001

P.G.DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WORK

CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that, the dissertation entitled “A STUDY ON TRAINING AND

DEVELOPMENT AMONG EMPLOYEES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO AMMAN
SPINNING MILLS, POLLACHI”, submitted to Bharathiar University, Coimbatore in partial
fulfillment of the requirements for the award of degree of M.S.W (Master of Social work), is
record of original work done by C.M.SIVA KUMAR (Reg No: 16-PW-13) during the period of
him study in the academic year 2016-2018. This dissertation is entirely an independent work on
part of the candidate under my guidance and supervision.

FACULTY SUPERVISOR HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT

(Ms.T. SIVARANJANE) (Dr.L.RANJIT)

EXTERNAL EXAMINER INTERNAL EXAMINER

 DECLARATION

I, C.M.SIVA KUMAR (Reg No:16-PW-13) hereby declare that the dissertation entitled
“A STUDY ON TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT AMONG EMPLOYEES WITH
SPECIAL REFERENCE TO AMMAN SPINNING MILLS, POLLACHI”, Submitted to
Bharathiar University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the degree of
Master of Social Work, under the supervision and guidance of Ms.T. SIVARANJANE.,
M.S.W., M.Phil., Assistant professor of P.G Department of Social Work, Nallamuthu Gounder
Mahalingam College, Pollachi. I further declare that this is an original study and no part of it
published to any university previously.

Date Signature of the candidate

C.M.SIVA KUMAR
(Reg No: 16 PW 13)
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

It is a great pleasure and privilege to acknowledge and express my deep of gratitude to

the management for their providing adequate infrastructure for doing this study.

I would like to express my gratitude to Dr.B.K. KRISHNARAJ VANAVARAYAR,

B.Com, B.L., and president NGM College for providing me the best facilities and infra structure
for the completion of this project.

I express my sincere thanks to Dr.P.M.PALANISAMY., M.A., M.Phil., Ph.D.,

PGDJMC., Principal NGM College for his constant encouragement throughout the project
work.

I would like to thank our Head of the Department Dr.L.RANJIT., Ph.D., who has been a
source of inspiration that enabled me to complete this project work.

I take this opportunity to express my Research Guide Ms.T. SIVARANJANE., M.S.W.,

M.Phil., for his valuable suggestion and constructive ideas at each stage of the project.

Lastly I would like to acknowledge the support reduced to me from my Friends, Family
Members and Well-Wishers.

C.M.SIVA KUMAR
(Reg No: 16 PW 13)
 LIST OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER TITLE PAGE NO

I INTRODUCTION ABOUT THE STUDY 1

II REVIEW OF LITERATURE 14

III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 23

IV DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION 28

V FINDINGS, SUGGESTION AND CONCLUSION 89

BIBLIOGRAPHY

ANNEXURE
 LIST OF TABLES

TABLE NO TITLE PAGE NO

4.1 AGE WISE CLASSIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS 29

4.2 GENDER WISE CLASSIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS 31

4.3 EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION WISE CLASSIFICATION OF

33
THE RESPONDENTS

4.4 ANNUAL INCOME WISE CLASSIFICATION OF THE

35
RESPONDENTS

4.5 MARITAL STATUS WISE CLASSIFICATION OF THE

37
RESPONDENTS

4.6 TYPE OF FAMILY WISE CLASSIFICATION OF THE

39
RESPONDENTS

4.7 SIZE OF FAMILY WISE CLASSIFICATION OF THE

41
RESPONDENTS

4.8 EXPERIENCE WISE CLASSIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS 43

4.9 PLACE OF RESIDENCE WISE CLASSIFICATION OF THE

45
RESPONDENTS

4.10 DESIGNATION WISE CLASSIFICATION OF THE

47
RESPONDENTS

4.11 NUMBER OF TRAINING PROGRAMMES HAVE ATTENDED 49

4.12 IMPORTANT OF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT 51

4.13 TYPE OF TRAINING 53

4.14 WHERE THE TRAINING 55

4.15 OBJECTIVES OF THE TRAINING PROGRAMS ATTENDED

57
HAVE ACHIEVED

4.16 FEEL THAT TRAINING PROGRAMS HAVE CONDUCTED 59

4.17 DURATION OF EACH TRAINING 61

4.18 TRAINING PROGRAM WERE RELEVANT TO WORK

63
REQUIREMENTS

4.19 OVERALL RATING TO THE TRAINING PROGRAME 65

4.20 OPINION ON PHYSICAL SETUP DURING TRAINING

67
PROGRAMME

4.21 HANDLED THE TRAINING SESSION 69

4.22 FREQUENCY OF THE TRAINING 71

4.23 SATISFACTION LEVEL ON ORGANIZATIONAL TRAINING

73
AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME

4.24 AGE AND TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT 75

4.25 GENDER AND TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT 76

4.26 EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION AND TRAINING AND

77
DEVELOPMENT

4.27 ANNUAL INCOME AND TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT 78

4.28 MARITAL STATUS AND TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT 79

4.29 TYPE OF FAMILY AND TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT 80

4.30 SIZE OF FAMILY AND TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT 81

4.31 EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT 82

4.32 PLACE OF RESIDENCE AND TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT 83

4.33 DESIGNATION AND TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT 84

4.34 ANOVA TABLE SHOWING THE DIFFERENCE IN MEAN

85
SCORES BETWEEN TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT & AGE

4.35 ANOVA TABLE SHOWING THE DIFFERENCE IN MEAN

SCORES BETWEEN TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT & 86
GENDER

4.36 ANOVA TABLE SHOWING THE DIFFERENCE IN MEAN

SCORES BETWEEN TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT & 87
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION

4.37 ANOVA TABLE SHOWING THE DIFFERENCE IN MEAN

SCORES BETWEEN TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT & 88
ANNUAL INCOME
 LIST OF CHARTS

CHART NO TITLE PAGE NO

4.1 AGE WISE CLASSIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS 30

4.2 GENDER WISE CLASSIFICATION OF THE 32

RESPONDENTS

4.3 EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION WISE 34

CLASSIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS

4.4 ANNUAL INCOME WISE CLASSIFICATION OF THE 36

RESPONDENTS

4.5 MARITAL STATUS WISE CLASSIFICATION OF THE 38

RESPONDENTS

4.6 TYPE OF FAMILY WISE CLASSIFICATION OF THE 40

RESPONDENTS

4.7 SIZE OF FAMILY WISE CLASSIFICATION OF THE 42

RESPONDENTS

4.8 EXPERIENCE WISE CLASSIFICATION OF THE 44

RESPONDENTS

4.9 PLACE OF RESIDENCE WISE CLASSIFICATION OF THE 46

RESPONDENTS

4.10 DESIGNATION WISE CLASSIFICATION OF THE 48

RESPONDENTS

4.11 NUMBER OF TRAINING PROGRAMMES HAVE 50

ATTENDED
4.12 IMPORTANT OF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT 52

4.13 TYPE OF TRAINING 54

4.14 WHERE THE TRAINING 56

4.15 OBJECTIVES OF THE TRAINING PROGRAMS ATTENDED 58

HAVE ACHIEVED

4.16 FEEL THAT TRAINING PROGRAMS HAVE CONDUCTED 60

4.17 DURATION OF EACH TRAINING 62

4.18 TRAINING PROGRAM WERE RELEVANT TO WORK 64

REQUIREMENTS

4.19 OVERALL RATING TO THE TRAINING PROGRAME 66

4.20 OPINION ON PHYSICAL SETUP DURING TRAINING 68

PROGRAMME

4.21 HANDLED THE TRAINING SESSION 70

4.22 FREQUENCY OF THE TRAINING 72

4.23 SATISFACTION LEVEL ON ORGANIZATIONAL 74

TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME