Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 MF Solidification 2018
1 MF Solidification 2018
Solidification
Disclaimer: This lecture note is edited from different sources for the solely of teaching and
learning purposes. It may contain copyrighted materials from their respective owners; therefore,
apart form teaching and learning purposes, this lecture note may not be reproduced, stored, or
transmitted in any form or by any means.
mushy liquid
solid zone
Stefanescu, 2011
1
4/11/2018
Growth conditions
Heat Transfer at the solidification front Microstructure/
macrostructure
Alloy composition
Solidification as a means
for assembling or manufacturing
Welding
Brazing
2
4/11/2018
Outline
Introduction
Nucleation
Growth of Solid
Lever and Scheil Equation
Solidification Cooling Curves
Heat Flow and Dendrite Growth
Alloys Solidification
Cast Structure
Rapid Solidification
Solidification Defects
Introduction
3
4/11/2018
Nucleation
4
4/11/2018
Nucleation terminology
Nucleation Phenomena
5
4/11/2018
Homogeneous Nucleation
6
4/11/2018
Nucleation Energy
Liquid Liquid
Solid
a b
G2
G1 G2 = VsGvs + VLGvL + ASLSL
G1 = (Vs + VL)GvL G2 = G1 + G
G = G2 – G1
If Gv = GvL - Gvs
Then:
G = - VsGv + ASLSL
Nucleation Energy
7
4/11/2018
Energy
lowered by
It can be shown that:
growing into
∗
2
crystals
Δ
16
Δ ∗
3 Δ
G and Temperature
From Gibbs-Thomson
GvL equation, sphere of radius r
will have a free energy
greater than that of bulk
solid by 2Vm/r per mole or
Gv r r* 2/r per unit volume.
Gvs 2 It can be seen from the
r* figure that
r
Gv = 2sL/r*
T
Tm T
8
4/11/2018
Thus:
∗
2 1 ∗
16 1
= ; Δ =
Δ 3 Δ
r* = critical radius of nucleus
γ = Surface free energy
9
4/11/2018
As the size of the cluster of atoms increases, total free energy change
increases up to a size r*
10
4/11/2018
11
4/11/2018
Heterogeneous Nucleation
Heterogeneous Nucleation
12
4/11/2018
Heterogeneous Nucleation
SL
Liquid (L)
Solid (S) ML
2 cos 1 cos
SM 4
Mould (M)
Thus:
∗
2
r Δ
∗
16
Δ .
cos 3 Δ
Hhet depends on wetting angle and
Ghet = - VsGv + ASLSL+ ASMSM- cap radius
ASMML The tendency of a crystal to spread
4
Δ 4 over the surface is called wetting,
3 that is
cos
13
4/11/2018
h/r Vc/V m
If the volume of spherical cap of height
1 0.5 0
h is given by 1/3 h2 (3r – h) where r is 0.8 0.35 0.21
the radius of the sphere; it then can be 0.5 0.16 0.50
shown that the ratio of the cap volume 0.3 0.06 0.72
0.1 0.007 0.9
to the volume of complete sphere is,
0.01 0.00007 0.99
0.001 0.0000 0.999
3 07
4
If the ratio h/r is represented by q,
then
3
4
Vc/V can be calculated for various
values of h/r,
14
4/11/2018
15
4/11/2018
Schematic comparison of
(a) homogeneous and (b)
heterogeneous nucleation
of a crystal in a
supercooled liquid.
Ghom
16
4/11/2018
17
4/11/2018
Applications of
Controlled Nucleation
18
4/11/2018
To produce cast ingots with fine grain size, grain refiners are added.
Example: For aluminum alloy, small amount of Titanium or Boron.
Grain structure of
Aluminum cast
with (a) and
without (b)
grain refiners.
(a) (b)
AlB2(grain refiner)
No addition
19
4/11/2018
heterogeneous nucleation
on a catalytic surface of
limited lateral extent
cannot produce growth
until the triple junction
between liquid, solid and
heterogeneity reaches the
edge of the catalytic
surface and the size.
Boride/Carbide Theory
Peritectic Hulk Theory
Duplex Nucleation
Theory
Solute Theory (Growth
Restriction Factor)
20
4/11/2018
21
4/11/2018
Grain structure development of Al-10Cu alloy inoculated by 500 ppm of Al-5Ti-1B grain
refiners, with two different cooling rates, 0.5K/s for images at the above and 0.025 K/s for
the images at the below
Li et al, MCWASP, 2015
1
T for Grain Initiation (K)
4 0.8
d
s f T 0.6
0
0 2 4 6 8
Particle Diameter (m)
22
4/11/2018
Growth of Solid
23
4/11/2018
Interface morphology
• Facetted
• Atomically smooth
• =sf /R>2
• Non-metals
•Intermetallic phases
•Growth by nucleation
of new atomic layers
• Non-facetted
• Atomically rough
• =sf/R<2
• metals
24
4/11/2018
Growth mechanisms
Twinning or dislocation:
Nucleation of new planes not necessary
Screw
dislocation
Twinning
Growth Anisotropy
25
4/11/2018
V K 2 (Tk ) 2
Screw dislocation
V K1Tk
K4
V K 3 exp( )
Tk
Two dimensional
nucleation
Continuous growth
= Δ
26
4/11/2018
Lateral growth
Growth Ledges
27
4/11/2018
1. Surface Nucleation
There will be a critical radius (r*) which
will decrease with increasing the interface
undercooling.
Once nucleated the disc will spread rapidly
over the surface and the rate of growth
normal to the interface will be governed by
the surface nucleation rate, given by:
v exp (-k2/ΔTi)
This mechanism is very ineffective at small
undercooling where r* is very large.
2. Spiral Growth
If the solid contains dislocations
that intersect the S/L interface
the problem of creating new
interfacial steps can be
circumvented.
The rate will be given by:
v = k3 ( ΔTi)2, where k3 is a
material constant.
This variation is shown in the
figure along with the variations
for continuous growth and two
dimensional system.
28
4/11/2018
29
4/11/2018
Alloy solidification
k = Partition Coefficient
– Constant for any T
Cooling slow enough to
allow extensive solid-
state diffusion
Solid & liquid always
homogeneous with
compositions following
solidus and liquidus.
A hypothetical phase diagram. k = Xs/XL is constant
30
4/11/2018
C0 (1 k)
C T0 mC0 m
k
Al-Fe Al-Mg
k=0.03 k=0.44 Example of Al-X
phase
diagrams with
different
Al-Mn Partition
Al-Si
k=0.90 k=0.14 coefficients
k=
31
4/11/2018
Lever Rule
Lever Rule
32
4/11/2018
Lever Rule
Lever Rule
33
4/11/2018
34
4/11/2018
at
Read work related to Brody – Fleming model for back diffusion and
further work by Himemiya dan Umeda (1998)
35
4/11/2018
3D
isometric
2D Liquidus
projection
Schematic description of solidification path and pattern for a ternary eutectic alloy with an initial
composition at O point. (a) Threes solidification stages along the liquidus projections of ternary phase
diagram; (b) The relationship between the interfacial temperature and the fraction of solid; (c) The
solidification pattern related to the microstructure formation corresponding to each stage.
36
4/11/2018
Chinese script
π-Al-(FeMg)-Si
β
Si
Mg2Si
37
4/11/2018
Coring microstructure
Liquid Entrapment
Sequence of 2D (left) and 3D (right) images extracted from the volume of the specimen held for various times at
570°C showing the different coarsening mechanisms occurring on the scale of the dendrite arms (dark grey on the 2D
images): a) progressive small dendrite arm melting; b) progressive interdendritic groove advancement; c) progressive
interdendritic groove advancement and joining of the tips of the dendrite arms, leading to the formation of entrapped
liquid.
L. Salvo, 2009
38
4/11/2018
Solidification Cooling
Curve
39
4/11/2018
Cooling Curves
40
4/11/2018
©2003 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Thomson Learning™ is a trademark used herein under
Solidification Cooling Curve of Pure Metal
41
4/11/2018
42
4/11/2018
43
4/11/2018
Growth Mechanisms
More heat will be conducted into the protruding solid and less
away so that the growth rate will decrease below that of the
planar regions and the protrusion will disappear.
44
4/11/2018
45
4/11/2018
Planar Growth
When the temperature of the
liquid is above the freezing
temperature a protuberance
on the solid-liquid interface
will not grow, leading to
maintenance of a planer
interface. Latent heat is
removed from the interface
through the solid
©2003 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Thomson
Learning™ is a trademark used herein under license.
46
4/11/2018
Growth Interfaces
Growth of Interfaces depends on
Concentration Gradient
Temperature Gradient
undercooling
Growth Rate
Types of Interfaces
Planar
Cellular
V = 0.2 1 µm/s 3 µm/s 7 µm/s
Dendritic
µm/s
Equiaxed
Transition growth
Transition of
growth
morphology from
planar to cellular, to
dendritic, as
compositionally
induced
undercooling
increases
(equivalent to G/V
being reduced).
47
4/11/2018
effect of alloying
Structure refinement
Increasing concentration
Increasing constitutional
undercooling (Tc)
Increasing morphological
instability
48
4/11/2018
Dendrite Growth
©2003 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Thomson Learning™ is a trademark used herein under
license.
49
4/11/2018
Dendritic growth
Glicksman ∆T = 4 K
∆T = 1 K
50
4/11/2018
T
cells dendrites
TL(x0)
G1>0
Absolute stability
Plane front
G2>G1
TS(x0)
51
4/11/2018
Dendrite fragmentation
Fragmentation mechanism
Mechanical fracture
Melting
Constitutional undercooling
52
4/11/2018
53
4/11/2018
Mathiesen, 2006
54
4/11/2018
Dendrite
spacing (µm)
Allows evaluating
local cooling rate in castings
55
4/11/2018
Growth modes
morphology & temperature distribution
Pure
metal
Alloy
Positive G Negative G
G/V Map
skin
center
Kurz
56
4/11/2018
57
4/11/2018
Eutectic solidification
When a binary eutectic solidifies, two solid
phases form cooperatively from the liquid:
Lα+β
Normal or Anomalous
Alternate lamellae
Normal = alternate lamellae, or rods of the
minor phase embedded in the major phase
Anomalous = faceting; has high entropy of
melting
Anomalous Solidification:
Occur in systems when one of the solid phases is Rod-like eutectic
capable of faceting, i.e. has a high entropy of
melting.
There are many variants of these structures the
most important commercially being the flake
structure of Al—Si alloys.
58
4/11/2018
Eutectic growth
Growth
direction
•Simultaneous, cooperative
growth of 2 or more phases
•Diffusion parallel to growth front
•Isothermal growth front
•Characteristic lamellar spacing,
determined by diffusion and curvature
2V K1 T K 2 T K 3 V
Stefanescu, 2011
59
4/11/2018
a - globular eutectic
b – acicular (needle-like) eutectic
c - lamellar eutectic
d – Chinese script
Growth of lamellae
2 phases grow cooperatively
behind a planar solidification
front.
As the alpha rich phase solidifies,
B A
excess B atoms diffuse laterally
and is incorporated into the beta
rich parts.
B A
60
4/11/2018
Phase field calculation results showing the time evolution of colony formation for an alloy with a small amount of
third element (impurity) added to a binary eutectic. The smooth contours ahead of the front represent isoconcentration
lines of the ternary impurity; the small “halos” just in front of the growing lamellae are a visualization of the interlamellar
eutectic diffusion field, (Plapp and Karma, 2002).
T = Tc + Tr
Undercooling
V C Tbr
2C 0 Irregular eutectics
D x Regular eutectics
Assumptions:
isothermal interface
densities of all phases are the same ex Spacing br
10 -1
r
T c V Nieswaag/Zuithoff 1975
Lamellar spacing, cm
Tiso2 V 1 4 r c Jackson-Hunt
10 -3
10 -5 10 -4 10 -3
Growth velocity, cm/s
61
4/11/2018
J-H Theory
The J-H theory works well for Sn-Pb but not for other systems.
Proposed growth behavior of irregular eutectics, showing branching at λbr and termination
at λex. (a) Fe-graphite eutectic growth at V: 1.7x10-2 µm/s and (b) schematic representation
of solid–liquid interface during growth (Magnin and Kurz, 1987).
62
4/11/2018
Off-eutectic
Composition
3:rd element
Off-eutectic
Solidification of an off-
eutectic alloy in a
temperature gradient:
a. Alloy composition in
relation to the phase
diagram
b. Schematic solidification
front
c. Temperature variation
across solidification front
d. Inset is a transverse
section through a dendrite
63
4/11/2018
Low temperature
gradient, high growth
rate
Dendrites + eutectic
Coupled Zone
64
4/11/2018
Sensor
Al-5Cu
65
4/11/2018
Eutectic Modification
Improves ductility
Increases porosity
100 ppm Sr
66
4/11/2018
IIT Mechanism
67
4/11/2018
TPRE Mechanism
a) shows Eu atoms between
every two Si atomic
columns are located at
the twin plane re-entrant
edge, indicating that
poisoning of the TPRE
mechanism is active.
b) shows Eu-rich atomic
columns are located at
the intersection of Si
facets and respectively
twins, indicating that the
IIT mechanism is active.
c) shows Eu atoms are
located ahead of the
growing Si twins, forming
a continuous Eu-rich
layer, indicating that a
solute entrainment
occurs within eutectic Si.
The roles of Eu during the growth of eutectic Si in Al-Si alloys. Li et al., Sci Report, 2015
68
4/11/2018
69
4/11/2018
Peritectic
Solidification
Peritectic solidification
L + α β, but
hardly ever happens
Primary: L→α
Peritectic: L + α →β
Eutectic: L → β+γ
70
4/11/2018
The peritectic solidification starts with a peritectic reaction in which all three phases, α, β, and liquid are
in contact with each other. The peritectic β phase will grow along the S/L interface α/L, driven by liquid
supersaturation. Solute rejected by the β phase will diffuse through the liquid to the α phase contributing
to its dissolution. The β phase will also thicken in the direction perpendicular to its growth, by direct
growth in the liquid and at the expense of the α phase by solid state diffusion. Once the reaction is
completed and all the α/L interface is covered by β, the peritectic transformation starts.
The liquid and the primary α phase are isolated by the β phase. The transformation α ⇒ β takes place by
long-range solid-state diffusion through the peritectic β phase.
Peritectic reaction
71
4/11/2018
Cast Structure
72
4/11/2018
Chill zone
©2003 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Thomson Learning™ is a trademark used herein under license.
Left to right: polycrystalline turbine blade, directionally solidified multi-grain blade, single
crystal jet engine blade
Dendrite micrograph of nickel-base superalloy aligned during DS processing of turbine
blade.
73
4/11/2018
(After Pratt and Whitney Co.) Growth of single crystal for turbine airfoil.
Silicon Boule
74
4/11/2018
Continuous casting
4-10
75
4/11/2018
Solidification in Welding
Schematic diagram showing interaction between the heat source and the base metal. Three distinct regions in the
weldment are the fusion zone, the heat-affected zone, and the base metal. (S.A. David and T. DebRoy, 1992)
76
4/11/2018
Growth in Weldpool
77
4/11/2018
Rapid Solidification
78
4/11/2018
History
79
4/11/2018
80
4/11/2018
The critical casting thickness versus the year in which alloys were discovered.
Over 40 years, the critical casting thickness has increased by more than three
orders of magnitude.
Sport equipment
81
4/11/2018
Solidification Defect
Shrinkage effects
82
4/11/2018
Shrinkage Defect
©2003 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Thomson Learning™ is a trademark used
herein under license.
Figure (a) Shrinkage can occur between the dendrite arms. (b) Small secondary dendrite
arm spacings result in smaller, more evenly distributed shrinkage porosity. (c) Short
primary arms can help avoid shrinkage. (d) Interdendritic shrinkage in an aluminum
alloy is shown (x 80)
83
4/11/2018
84
4/11/2018
Macrosegregation
: composition
changes over
distances
comparable to the
size of the
specimen
Microsegregation:
occurs on the
scale of dendrite
arm spacing
In large castings, when equiaxed solidification occurs, the equiaxed grains may move, due
to fluid convection ahead of the mushy zone. The evolution of the temperature and velocity
fields during the solidification, one can well see the vortex due to natural convection
Rappaz, 1996, Gandin,1998 in Thevoz, JOM, 2002
85
4/11/2018
Microsegregation
Intercellular solute control
volume within a cellulated solid-
melt region.
The expanded inset shows
the solute mass flows
occurring in the steady-state
cellular microsegregation
model.
86
4/11/2018
Fig. (a) 2-D FVM simulation of a freckle formation in an Ni-Al alloy. The left
and right panels show positive and negative segregation index maps
87
4/11/2018
References
88