Manalese Thesis

THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL MEDIA ON THE PERSONALITY
PREFERENCES OF THE GENERATION Z OF THE

COLLEGE OF THE HOLY SPIRIT OF TARLAC:
A BASIS FOR AN INTERVENTION PROGRAM
An Undergraduate Thesis
Presented to the Faculty
of the Psychology Program
College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree
Bachelor of Science in Psychology
By:
Angelika M. Manalese
March 2019
1
COLLEGE OF THE HOLY SPIRIT OF TARLAC
San Sebastian Village, Tarlac City
CHAPTER I
THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND
Introduction
“Personality is to a man what perfume is to a flower” (Charles M.
Schwab, 2012). What a person is says a lot about who that person is. Whether
a person is cheerful, carefree, timid, calm, dominant, or sociable all depends
on that individual’s personality. Our personality is what makes us distinct from
one another, it’s what makes you “you.” As stated in the quote above, just
like a flower with its own unique scent, man has his own unique personality.
It varies for each and one of us. Personality traits are the proof that individual
differences among us truly exist. Personality is not just solely the attitude we
have. It is not just a charm we present to others, it is a holistic part of us. Our
personality is comprised of our patterns of thinking, feeling, and behaving. It
is deeply ingrained in us and it is what characterizes our uniqueness. As
observed, although people remain distinct from each other, it can be seen that
collective personality seems to take place in certain age groups.
The concept of collective personality refers to a group’s consistent
behaviors across time and context. Because of current trends, people in a
given time tend to conform to others. A certain age group of people belonging
to the same generation will most likely have similar temperaments with one
another. This is the reason why people are classified by the generation they
were born to. Generation Z, also known as the Post-Millennials, are those who
2
were born in 1995-2012. This generation have their stereotyped
characteristics, qualities, traits and personalities. It is a given fact that we all
have our own personal personality, but it is also true that we have similar
personalities with most of the people in the same age group we belong to due
to environmental factors, influence from interpersonal relationships, and
effects of technological advancements.
One very prominent technological advancement that has brought about
a change to our personality, especially to the youth nowadays, is the social
media. Ever since social media has been invented, it made an impactful
transformation. Almost all of the people in the world are using social media,
and Generation Z are well-known for being the generation that is very gadget-
oriented and very familiar with almost all of the digital utilities. This is the
generation in which the members are hooked with their gadgets and use most
of their time in social media. Gen Z also has a different experience with
technology than of the past generations, they grew up in a society in which
social media has been already existing. Due to the perks and cons of this
advancement made in our technology, it has captured the interest of many.
It changed majority of the youth’s preferences, such as their preferences in
their health, dating, education, and personality. And the aim of this study is
to determine the effects of social media on the respective respondents’
personality preferences.
3
Background of the Study
Personality has been said to be the most dynamic aspect of an
individual. It is what makes individual differences among us exist. The
researcher had an interest in doing this study to determine the significance of
personality preferences in relation as to how are these affected by our
frequent use of different social media networks. Social media has become a
prominent and essential medium in our daily lives. By being exposed to
different social media, we are influenced by the people we engage with
through online communication. We meet a vast of virtual friends through these
social media and in a way, we unconsciously adapt their way of behaving.
Different trends that surges up on the internet also played a large role in
influencing our preferences. On another aspect, the researcher had an interest
in studying the generation z and their personality. This classification of
generation basing in the age group of people has become a significant topic
in today’s time. Since this generation particularly grew up in a different
environment in terms of technology they grew up with including the media
and advertising messages they heard, the politics and economic up and downs
they witnessed, and the parenting norms and educational materials that were
utilized during their childhood. All of these have different influences on these
post-millennials. Hence, this study was made to determine this generation’s
preferences.
4
Theoretical Framework
In order to look into the personality preferences of Post-Millennials, the
researcher used the Type Theory of Personality to further explain the relation
of each variable.
Type Theory of Personality
Type theories of personality divide people into distinct groups on the
basis of a combination of preferred behavior and focusing on similarities
between people. Within Jung’s 1969 analytical psychology, although he did
not deny the uniqueness and complexity of each individual, he nevertheless
argued that people could be categorized into definable types. Jung defined
personality types as patterns in the way people prefer to perceive and make
judgements. Individuals choose either perception or judgement as a dominant
mode to guide their lives and the other as an auxiliary process. By combining
an individual’s dominant attitude and function, their basic personality type can
be determined (DiCaprio, 2001). The various personality types differ in their
interests, values and needs. Different types learn in different ways, cherish
different ambitions and respond to different rewards (Jung, 2000). When
considering personality types, people are grouped or classified in discrete
categories in which they are perceived as exclusively their type, with no
characteristics of one or other type. Traits, involve classifying or categorizing
people in terms of how much of some characteristics they possess (Pervin,
2003). Trait theorists believe that traits exist on a continuum ranging from a
5
very small amount to a large amount of the characteristic (Feist, 2004). In
this research, personality is viewed from a type perspective. Therefore, the
discussion continues with an analysis of type theory, as well as the way
personality is measured according to this approach.
This theory is a large determinant in looking at the stereotyped
personalities that belong to each person as well as generations. This theory
helps in classifying what traits characterizes majority of the members of each
generation. The research then relied on the Type Theory of Personality.

6
Research Paradigm
INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT

The profile of the use
of different social
networks of the
Generation Z of the
College of the Holy
Spirit of Tarlac in
terms:
 Facebook
 Twitter
Ascertaining the Degree to
 Instagram
which the Personality
 Snapchat
Preferences of the
 Tumblr
Generation Z Respondents
 Google
are influenced by their
 Yahoo
social media usage
 Youtube
The extent to which
A Personality Preference
social media has an
Schedule that Will be Part
effect on the
of Each Respondents’
respondents in the
Determination of the Psychological Assessment,
following aspects:
Significant Effect of the which is an Important Tool
 Family Relationship
Social Media on the in Counseling
 Peer Relationship
→ Personality Preferences →
 Academics
of Generation Z in the Better Understanding of
 Social Networking
College of the Holy Spirit Each Respondents’
Profile of the
of Tarlac Individuality
respondents in terms
of the following
An Intervention Program
Personality
that would help in resolving
Preferences:
the arising problems
● Achievement
encountered in social media
● Deference
usage including preventive
● Order
measures that could apply
● Exhibition
improvement on the social
● Autonomy
media’s effect on
● Affiliation
personality
● Interception
● Succorance
● Dominance
● Abasement
● Nurturance
● Change
● Endurance
● Heterosexuality
● Aggression
Figure 1: Paradigm of the Study
The Effect of Social Media on the Personality Preferences of the Generation Z of
the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac: A Basis for an Intervention Program
7
The paradigm of this study, illustrated in Figure 1, presents for its input
the profile of the use different social media networks of the generation z of
the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac, the extent to which the post-
millennial’s use of social media affects their family relationship, peer
relationship, academics and social networking, and the profile of the
Generation Z of the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of
Achievement, Deference, Order, Exhibition, Autonomy, Affiliation,
Interception, Succorance, Dominance, Abasement, Nurturance, Change,
Endurance, Heterosexuality, and Aggression Personality Preferences.
The figure also indicates four intended outputs, which include awareness
of the extent to which the respondents’ personality preferences are affected
by their level of social media usage, ascertaining the necessity to include a
personality preferences schedule in the respondents’ psychological
assessment, gaining a better understanding of generation z respondents’
individuality, and including an intervention program that would reverse the
negative effects of the findings.
In order to realize the above outputs, the researcher will determine the
relation of social media on the personality preferences of the respondents
through a test of significance of correlation.

8
Statement of the Problem
This study aims to determine the effect of social media on the
personality preferences of the Generation Z. Specifically, this research intends
to answer the following:
1. What is the demographic profile of the respondents generation z in
terms of:
1.1. Age?
1.2. Gender?
2. What is the profile of the use of different social networks of the
generation z of the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of:
2.1. Facebook?
2.2. Twitter?
2.3. Instagram?
2.4. Snapchat?
2.5. Tumblr?
2.6. Google?
2.7. Yahoo? And
2.8. Youtube?
3. What is the personality preference of the Post-Millennials of the College
of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of:
3.1. Achievement?
3.2. Deference?
9
3.3. Order?
3.4. Exhibition?
3.5. Autonomy?
3.6. Affiliation?
3.7. Interception?
3.8. Succorance?
3.9. Dominance?
3.10. Abasement?
3.11. Nurturance?
3.12. Change?
3.13. Endurance?
3.14. Heterosexuality? And
3.15. Aggression?
4. What is the effect of social media on the generation z of the College of
the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of:
4.1. Family Relationship?
4.2. Peer Relationship?
4.3. Academics? And
4.4. Social Networking?
5. Does social media has a significant effect on the personality preferences
of the generation z of the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac?

10
6. What intervention program can be proposed for the post-millennials
whose personality preferences are adversely affected by their use of
social media?
Hypothesis
The null hypothesis in this study is that social media has no significant
effect on the personality preferences of the Post-Millennial Generation.
Scope and Limitations of the Study
The bounds of this research is the effect of social media on the
personality preferences of the respondents belonging to generation z within
the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac. The respondents’ social media usage
was measured using the Social Media Self-Made Test Checklist and for the
Personality Preferences, it was measured by Edwards Personal Preference
Schedule.
The researcher included the respondents’ demographics including age
and gender. However, in terms of age, the study was specifically directed
towards individuals ranging from ages 16-23. The results of this study will
only be applicable and limited to the participants of the study.
Significance of the Study
This research is sought to find out how social media influences the
personality of the post-millennials. Furthermore, this study aims to establish
an affirmation that usage of social media has an impact on the development

11
of a person’s personality and creates a similar pattern of behavior on the
members within a generation.
For the Administrators, this research will help them know that the
students within their school are social media oriented and will guide them in
assessing what development changes could be made in order to obtain better
implications on the students’ preferences.
For the Faculty Members, this is to help them become aware of how
social media is used by the student body in their educational pursuits. It could
aid them in knowing what actual help they could offer for their students and
encourage the learners to direct their concerns on more reliable resources.
For the Guidance Counselor, it could aid them in assessing students’
behavior in social media and behavior in school. It could also be a guide in
assigning students to the appropriate course or strand for them and helping
the learners in deciding what career path they may take in the future
according to the personality preferences.
For the Parents, it could be of help in relating to their children. By
knowing how the use of social media has an effect on their children, it would
prompt them to cope up and grasp the millennial terms that their sons and
daughters use. It could be a guide on how to approach their children and could
also help them in understanding the needs of their child.
For the Students, it could help them become enlightened of how often
they use social media so as to moderate their usage if it exceeds the normal
12
level. It also gives them an insight on how the frequency of their social media
usage has a relative effect on their preferences. By discovering their own
personalities, it could serve as a guide in assessing their own selves.
Definition of Terms
The following terms are defined for facility and understanding of the
readers
Abasement
Conceptually defined as the action or fact of abasing or being abased;
humiliation or degradation. Operationally, it is a need to accept blame for
problems and confess errors to others.
Academics
Conceptually, is used to describe things that relate to the work done in
schools, colleges, and universities, especially work which involves studying
and reasoning rather than practical or technical skills. Operationally, it is the
manifestation of academic activities in the use of social media.
Achievement
Conceptually, it is a thing done successfully, typically by effort, courage,
or skill. Operationally, it is a need to accomplish tasks well.
Affiliation
Conceptually referred to as the state or process of affiliating or being
affiliated. Operationally, it is a need to form strong friendships and
attachments.
13
Aggression
Conceptually, it is defined as hostile or violent behavior or attitudes
toward another. Operationally, it is a need to express one's opinion and be
critical of others.
Autonomy
Conceptually, it is freedom from external control or influence;
independence. Operationally, it is a need to be free of responsibilities and
obligations.
Change
Conceptually defined as the act or instance of making or becoming
different. Operationally, it is a need to seek new experiences and avoid
routine.
Deference
Conceptually referred to as humble submission and respect.
Operationally, it is a need to conform to customs and defer to others.
Dominance
Conceptually, it is power and influence over others. Operationally, it is
a need to be a leader and influence others.
Endurance
Conceptually, the fact or power of enduring an unpleasant or difficult
process or situation without giving way. Operationally, it is a need to follow
through on tasks and complete assignments.

14
Exhibition
Conceptually, it is a display or demonstration of a particular skill.
Operationally, it is a need to be the center of attention in a group.
Family Relationship
Conceptually, it is defined as relatedness or connection by blood or
marriage or adoption. Operationally, it is the individual’s functioning within
the family as manifested in their social media use.
Generation Z
Conceptually, it is the demographic unit after the Millennials or
Generation Y. Operationally, it is a group of people who are considered to be
young.
Intraception
Conceptually, it is referred to as the primarily processing of the world
through ones feelings or emotions. Operationally, it is a need to analyze
behaviors and feelings of others.
Intervention Program
Conceptually, it is a specific program or set of steps to help people
improve in an area of need. Operationally, it is a systematic guideline set to
improve the use of social media of the generation z.

15
Heterosexuality
Conceptually, it is the romantic attraction, sexual attraction or sexual
behavior between persons of the opposite sex or gender. Operationally, it is a
need to be associated with and attractive to members of the opposite sex.
Nurturance
Conceptually, it is the ability to provide emotional and physical care.
Operationally, it is a need to be of assistance to others.
Order
Conceptually, it is the arrangement or disposition of people or things in
relation to each other according to a particular sequence, pattern, or method.
Operationally, it is a need to plan well and be organized.
Peer Relationship
Conceptually, it is social interactions among same-aged peers.
Operationally, it is the manifestation of interacting and socializing with friends
through social media use.
Personality Preferences
Conceptually, defined as a way of classifying a person's natural
tendencies. Operationally, it is the tendencies of how a person acts depending
on how they prefer to react on given situations.
Social Media
Conceptually, these are websites and applications that enable users to
create and share content or to participate in social networking. Operationally,

16
it is referred as those means of communication and entertainment used by
most of the people nowadays as a form of leisure.
Social Networking
Conceptually, it is the use of dedicated websites and applications to
interact with other users, or to find people with similar interests to oneself.
Operationally, it is the usage of different social media platforms among
individuals.
Succorance
Conceptually, it is a dependence on or an active seeking for nurturant
care. Operationally, it is a need to receive support and attention from others.

17
Chapter II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
This chapter presents the theories and related studies which help the
researcher in the conceptualization of the study.
Foreign Literature
In relationship to mental health, social media “likes” impact teens’
brains and behavior. The same brain circuits that are activated by eating
chocolate and winning money are activated when teenagers see large
numbers of “likes” on their own photos or the photos of peers in a social
network, according to findings from a new study in which researchers scanned
the teens’ brain while they used social media.
In addition to individual unconscious, there is a collective unconscious
containing the universal memories and history of humankind. Individuals
share a collective unconscious containing the images and themes that unite
human history and experience. (Carl Jung, 2008)
A key concept of personality is that of social interest, empathy and
concern for others. Social interest reflects the ability to be unselfish, to be
sympathetic, to cooperate, and to feel connected to the people around the
world. (Alfred Adler, 2009)
Many psychologists believe that behavior is more strongly influenced by
the situation you are in than by your personality. Numerous situations, from
working in an office to playing in a marching band, require us to set aside

18
preferences and feelings and behave in specific ways. Other psychologists
reply that even in situations that demand a certain uniformity, individuals
manage to put their unique marks on their environments. (Psychology 2nd
ed., Carole Wade and Carol Travis, 2011)
Personality is defined as the characteristics of patterns of behavior,
thought, and emotion that determines a person’s adjustment to one’s
environment. (Atkinson and Bem, 2014)
Local Literature
How we perceive the world, our attitudes, thoughts, and feelings are all
part of our personality. (A Breakthrough in School Guidance & Counseling 1st
ed., Doris D. Tulio, 2012)
Social media serves as the Internet to the majority of Filipino online
users. Over 80% of the Philippine Internet population uses social media. In
Universal McCann’s 2008 Wave 3 study on social media, the Philippines has
the highest penetration of social networking among Internet users at 83%,
compared with the global average of 58%. Among the available social media
platforms, Filipino online users prefer using Facebook over Twitter, Tumblr,
Pinterest among others, with 92% having profile and with women as the most
active users. For Filipino online users, Facebook is the easiest and cheapest to
access. Mobile networks in the Philippines offer it for free as package for data
plan or as an incentive for subscribing to their network.

19
Personality refers to a distinctive set of traits, behavior styles, and
patterns that make up our character or individuality. (A Breakthrough in
School Guidance & Counseling 1st ed., Doris D. Tulio, 2012)
The pervasive use of social media in the Philippines greatly affected the
manner by which Filipino interact and communicate. Many live in the “always
available mode”. While the Philippines is not an information based society, it
is very much network cultured.
Individual personality is defined by attitudes and behavior that persist
in many situations over long periods of time. These traits or habits leave traces
in almost everything a person thinks, feels, and does. (A Breakthrough in
School Guidance & Counseling 1st ed., Doris D. Tulio, 2012)
Conformity is yielding to group pressure even when no direct request to
comply has been made. (Psychology, A simplified approach in understanding
human behavior 1st ed., Angeles and Quizon-Villavicencio, 2008)
This is how Filipinos use social media - broken down according to the
respective activities: to keep company - 62%, to share new experiences to
friends and followers - 63%, to have fun - 65%, to meet new people - 70%,
to stay in touch with friends and family - 74% (Vulcan, 2014)
Around the world, internet users grew 10%, or an additional 354 million
people, while active social media users jumped 21 percent, or an additional
482 million. Global active netizens using mobile phones and other devices
surged 30%, or another 581 million people.

20
Foreign Studies
"A study on relationship between personality traits and employment
factors of college students" by Change Kai-Wen conducted an in-depth
research on the relationship between personality traits and employment
factors in hope of understanding how students' personality traits affect their
job choice.
"A Literature Review on Personality, Creativity, and Innovative
Behavior" by Iqra Abdullah, Rozeyta Omar, and Siti Aisyha Panatik intended
to explore the relationship of personality of an individual and innovative
behavior, how personality factors of an individual can influence his innovative
outcomes at workplace.
"How have males and females been described over the past two
centuries? An analysis of Big-Five personality-related adjectives in the Google
English Books" by Shenglu Ye, Simin Cai, Chuansheng Chen, Qun Wan, and
Xiuying Qian studied their topic using the American corpus and the English
fiction corpus from Google Books databases, this study examined the
frequencies of Big-Five personality adjectives used to describe the two
genders between 1800 and 2000. Both gender similarities and differences
were found. For both genders, adjectives related to agreeableness were used
most often and those related to neuroticism least often. The usage frequency
of agreeableness showed a steady decline, whereas extraversion and
openness showed increases first and then leveled off. In terms of gender
21
differences, the overall frequencies were higher for men than women for
agreeableness, extraversion, conscientiousness, and neuroticism, but there
was no gender difference for openness. Gender differences showed some
reduction over time.
"A Survey of 19 Countries Shows How Generations X, Y, and Z Are —
and Aren’t — Different" by Henrik BresmanVinika D. Rao is a survey conducted
to 18,000 professionals and students across these three generations from 19
countries, and found some important differences in their aspirations and
values.
"Personality Characteristics are Independently Associated with
Prospective Memory in the Laboratory, and in Daily Life, Among Older Adults"
by Kerry A. McCabe, Steven Paul Woods, Michael Weinborn, Hamid Sohrabi,
Stephanie Rainey-Smith, Belinda M.Brown, Samantha L. Gardener, Kevin
Taddei, and Ralph N.Martins proposed that Prospective memory (PM) can
deteriorate with age and adversely influence health behaviors. Research
suggests that personality is related to PM in healthy young adults, findings
indicate that personality plays a role in PM functioning in the laboratory and
daily life.
Local Studies
"Studying Personality Traits Across Cultures: Philippine Examples" by
Church A. Timothy and Marcia S. Katigbak stated that trait perspectives are
dominant in the study of personality cross-culturally. The researchers review

22
the questions addressed to study personality traits across cultures, including,
among others, whether traits are used in all cultures to understand persons
and their behavior, the universality versus culture-specificity of traits, the
validity of imported and indigenous measures of personality traits, and the
meaningfulness of trait comparisons across cultures. Overall, personality
research in the Philippines supports the applicability of traits and trait theory
as a basis for understanding persons and their behavior across cultures.
"Understanding the Filipino Millennial Generation" by Chester Cabalza
intends to analyze the existing culture of the young Filipino generation who
belong to the so-called “Millennials”. At the outset, the authors would like to
examine if there is a so-called “millennial culture” in the context of the
Philippine culture and society. In doing so, the authors explore three most
common specific facets of a millennial’s life; their decisions and preferences
when it comes to their careers, lifestyle, and relationship choices. This paper
also aims to analyze these above-mentioned aspects of millennial culture
through a theoretical framework that will be supported by personal opinions
and narratives of some millennials who were interviewed, including opinions
and advices from an expert. Furthermore, this paper also aspires to shed light
on the usual negative connotations and stereotypes thrown against the
millennials in general, and conclude if these are also rightfully applicable to
the current Filipino millennial group. This paper also aims to contribute to the
23
knowledge and understanding of the academic and even the non-academic
community about the Millennials.
"Comparing Generation X to Generation Y on work-related beliefs" by
Susana Fernandez examined potential generational and gender differences on
three work-related beliefs, namely, work engagement, teamwork, and career
development. Results showed that Gen Y was more engaged at work than Gen
X. Furthermore, men were found to be more engaged at work and are more
content with their career discussions than women.
"Highly Confident Generation X, Responsibility Seeking Generation Y,
and a few Baby Boomers in a Manufacturing Firm and the Undergraduate
Business Management Curriculum" by Gloria S. Santos is a study undertaken
to determine the specific characteristics and motivation of each generation.
Findings from the validated questionnaires revealed that only one from the 39
respondents was from the Baby Boomer generation, two of the three
managers were from Generation X, nine from the 13 supervisors were
Generation Y, and 17 from the 23 office staff were also Generation Y. In
conclusion, a few Baby Boomers were still employed, Generation X were
managers while Generation Y were mostly supervisors and office staff but seek
more responsibilities and aspire for respect.

24
CHAPTER III
METHODS AND PROCEDURES
This chapter presents the research design of the study, respondents
involved, methods of gathering data, instruments used, and analysis of data.
Research Method
This research determined the effects of social media usage on the
personality preferences of the Generation Z of the College of the Holy Spirit
of Tarlac. The researcher made use of the descriptive correlational design in
this particular study.
Respondents of the Study
The respondents are composed of students drawn from the population
of the learners from the senior high and college department of the College of
the Holy Spirit of Tarlac. The subjects’ ages range from 16 to 23 years old and
were chosen in a combined purposive, stratified random, and convenience
sampling technique.
Instruments
Edwards Personal Preference Schedule was used to measure personality
preferences. This test was designed primarily as an instrument for research
and counselling processes to provide quick and convenient measures of a
number of relatively independent normal personality variables. Another
instrument used is a Social Media Self-Made Test.

25
Data Gathering Procedure
The Edwards Personal Preference Schedule (EPPS) test was borrowed
from the Guidance Office of the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac with the
permission of one of the Guidance Associates. The researcher presented a
letter asking for permission to give the EPPS to students. After preparing the
set of materials for the study and receiving permission to administer the test,
the researcher proceeded in conducting the study. The data were gathered
through the administration of EPPS to the respondents of the study. After
which, the data obtained from the respondents were then tallied.
Statistical Treatment
The statistical treatment that determined the sum of the scores of a
group for a particular value over the total number of subjects is as follows:
Mean:
Where:
x̅ = summation of individual raw score
Σx = summation of the percentile
N = number of respondents
26
Pearson Product Moment Correlation (r)
This was used to determine the relationship between the following:
Personality Preferences profile with the Social Media profile of the
respondents.
The Formula is:
Where:
r= the Pearson coefficient of correlation between variables X and Y;
X= mean score of the respondents measuring their assessment on the first
variable;
Y= mean score of the respondents measuring their assessment on the
second variable; and
N= the number of paired observations.
The computed Pearson Coefficient of Correlation, r. will be interpreted
based on the following scale:
Pearson coefficient r Verbal Interpretation
0.90 to 1.00 Very High Correlation
0.70 to 0.89 High Correlation
0.40 to 0.69 Moderate Correlation
0.20 to 0.39 Low Correlation
0.20 to 0.20 Negligible Correlation

27
To test the significance of the Pearson Coefficient of Correlation, r, the
researcher used the formula for Significance of the Correlation Coefficient:
Where:
t= coefficient for significance
N-2= degrees of freedom
r= Pearson product of moment correlation
CHAPTER IV
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
This chapter presents the data interpretation and analysis of the study.
TABLE 1 - The Demographic Profile of the Generation Z of the College

of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of Age
Age Frequency Percentage
16 6 6.4%
28
17 32 34%
18 21 22.3%
19 17 18.1%
20 5 5.3%
21 9 9.6%
22 3 3.2%
23 1 1.1%
TOTAL 94 100%
Table 1 shows the age distribution of the respondents. The survey
reveals that majority of the respondents comes from those who are aged 17
years old, having a percentage of 34%.
TABLE 2 - The Demographic Profile of the Generation Z of the College

of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of Gender
Gender Frequency Percentage
Female 72 76.6%
Male 22 23.4%
TOTAL 94 100%
29
It can be seen in table 2, the total respondents obtained from the
Generation Z of the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac are ninety four (94).
Most of the respondents are female, with 72 participants having a percentage
of 76.6%.
TABLE 3 - Profile on the Use of the Different Social Media Networks
of the Generation Z of the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac
No. of
Social Media Total No. of
Respondents Percentage
Networks Respondents
with Accounts
Facebook 94 94 100%
Google 88 94 93.6%
Youtube 82 94 87.2%
Instagram 78 94 83%
Twitter 69 94 73.4%
Snapchat 55 94 58.5%
Yahoo 51 94 54.3%
Tumblr 18 94 19.1%
Social media, are dedicated websites and applications which are used to
interact with other users, or to find people with similar interests to oneself.
Presented on the table are the different social media networks that the
30
participants have accounts on. The aforementioned data revealed that out of
94 respondents, 94 of them have a Facebook account, 88 have a Google
Account, 82 have a Youtube account, 78 have an Instagram account, 69 have
their own Twitter account, 55 respondents have a Snapchat account, a total
of 51 participants have a Yahoo account, and 18 respondents with a Tumblr
account being the least social media network used by the Post-Millennials in
the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac. This is an indicator of how widespread
the use of social media is nowadays among teens, most especially for
Facebook which is an account used for socializing. As it can be seen from the
data, 100% of the respondents have a Facebook account. And it could be seen
that there are respondents who have accounts on all the mentioned social
media platforms, it just goes to show how prominent social networking is
among the generation z.
TABLE 4 - Social Media Profile of the Generation Z of the College of

the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of Family Relationship
Item Weighted Weighted Verbal

Item Statement
No. Score Mean Interpretation
How often do you eat with

1 381 4.05 Often
your family?
How often do you interact with

7 your family outside of social 385 4.10 Often
media?
2 How often do you meet/get 379 4.03 Often

31
together with your family?
How often do you use social

5 media whenever you are with 374 3.98 Often
your family?
How often do you go out with

3 your family (e.g. go to the 309 3.29 Sometimes
mall, museum, park, etc.)?

6 your family through social 305 3.24 Sometimes
media?
How often do you share

thoughts, feelings, or opinions
10 266 2.83 Sometimes
on social media that you can’t
share with your family?
Does your family get upset

with you whenever you use
social media when you are
together?
How often do you open up

4 about your feelings and/or 249 2.65 Sometimes
thoughts to your family?
Do you share social media

9 accounts with your family 186 1.98 Rarely
members?
OVERALL MEAN 3.29
Family relationship is the functioning and relatedness within families, it
includes having a strong familial bond and connection between family
members. In table 4, it can be seen that for four item numbers 1, 2, 5, and
32
7, most of the respondents answered “Often.” Items 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10
acquired a “sometimes” response from majority of the respondents. And item
number 9 obtained a “rarely” response from the respondents.
The item statement that got the highest weighted score is “How often
do you eat with your family?” The item that got the next highest weighted
score is “How often do you interact with your family outside of social media?”
The third highest is the item “How often do you meet/get together with your
family?” which all obtained an “Often” response. This is a good indication as it
shows that the respondents, despite their use of social media, still find quality
time with their family. The fourth highest among the items is “How often do
you use social media whenever you are with your family?” this has a negative
connotation because it shows that most of the respondents seem to give more
importance in using their social media instead of interacting with their families
when they’re together often times.
For the item “How often do you go out with your family (e.g. go to the
mall, museum, park, etc.)?” most of the respondents answered “sometimes”.
This shows that the respondents find recreational activities to do with their
family occasionally. Most respondents answered “sometimes” also for the item
“How often do you share thoughts, feelings, or opinions on social media that
you can’t share with your family?” and “How often do you open up about your
feelings and/or thoughts to your family?” This indicates that the respondents
33
seem to share their sentiments not just in social media but with their family
once in a while. The respondents answered “sometimes” for the item “Does
your family get upset with you whenever you use social media when you are
together?” This indicates that the respondents are aware of how their families
react with their use of social media yet still continue to occasionally use it
when they spend time together.
And lastly, the item that got the lowest score is “Do you share social
media accounts with your family members?” which obtained a “rarely”
response from the respondents which indicates that the respondents seem to
be not fond of sharing their social media with their family.
TABLE 5 - Social Media Classification of the Generation Z of the

College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of Family Relationship
Verbal
Scores Frequency Percentage
Interpretation
39 – 45 10 10.64% Above Average
33 – 38 42 44.68% High Average
27 – 32 31 32.98% Average
23 – 26 7 7.45% Low Average

34
18 – 22 4 4.26% Below Average
TOTAL 94 100%
Table 5 displays the classification of the respondents of the study in
terms of their family relationship. Ten respondent at 10.64% is above average
in terms of family relationship. Forty-two respondents are rated high average
at 44.68%, this is the highest rate among the subjects. Thirty one of the
participants are average at 32.98%. Seven of the respondents at 7.45% are
low average. Four of the subjects who participated are below average at
4.26%. The collected data shows that among the respondents, majority of
them are high average with regards to their family relationship manifested in
their use of social media. This shows that the respondents have a good alliance
within their familial functioning despite of their use of social media.

the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of Peer Relationship

Item Statement
How often do you talk with

1 387 4.12 Often
your peers of social media?

2 your peers through social 385 4.10 Often
media?
3 How often do you use social 355 3.78 Often

35
media while you are with your

peers?
How often do you talk

6 positively about your peers 335 3.56 Often
through social media?
How often social media does

8 improve/fix your relationships 297 3.16 Sometimes
with your peers?
How often do you compare

4 yourself with your peers 247 2.63 Sometimes
How often does social media

7 destroy your relationships with 196 2.09 Rarely
your peers?
How often do you talk

5 negatively about your peers 193 2.05 Rarely
How often do you get into

9 180 1.91 Rarely
fights because of social media?
How often do you get into

10 161 1.71 Rarely
fights on social media?
OVERALL MEAN 2.91
Peer relationship is the social interactions among same-aged peers, it is
based on mutual respect, appreciation, and liking between peer members. In
table 6, it can be seen that for four item numbers 1, 2, 3, and 6, most of the
respondents answered “Often.” Items 4 and 8 acquired a “sometimes”

36
response from majority of the respondents. And item numbers 5, 7, 9, and 10
obtained a “rarely” response from the respondents.
do you talk with your peers of social media?” and the item that got the next
highest weighted score is “How often do you interact with your peers through
social media?” which both obtained an “Often” response. This is a good
indication as it shows that the respondents often communicate and connect
with their peers through the use of social media. The third highest among the
items is “How often do you use social media while you are with your peers?”
this has a negative connotation because it shows that most of the respondents
seem to give more importance in using their social media instead of interacting
with their peers when they’re together often times. The fourth highest among
the items is “How often do you talk positively about your peers through social
media?” which indicates that the respondents talk of good things about their
peers and uplift their peers image in their social media platforms.
For the item “How often social media does improve/fix your relationships
with your peers?” most of the respondents answered “sometimes”. This shows
that the respondents seem to find social media, on an occasional basis, as a
medium for fixing conflict or strengthening their relations with their peers.
Most respondents answered “sometimes” also for the item “How often do you
compare yourself with your peers through social media?” This has a bad
37
indication because it seems that the respondents sometimes feel insecure with
themselves brought about by their use of social media.
For the item “How often does social media destroy your relationships
with your peers?” it obtained a “rarely” response from the respondents which
indicates that the respondents seem to have a healthy relationship with their
peers virtually as their peer relations don’t get hindered often. The item “How
often do you talk negatively about your peers through social media?” also got
a response of “rarely” which shows that the respondents do not destroy their
peers’ reputation on social media. Another item that got a “rarely” response
is “How often do you get into fights because of social media?” which indicates
that the participants, despite of their use of social media, it does not hamper
their relationship with others. And lastly, the item that got the lowest score
“How often do you get into fights on social media?” which also obtained a
“rarely” response from the respondents which indicates that the respondents
do not stir up commotions on social media.

College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of Peer Relationship
Verbal
Interpretation
39 – 45 3 3.19% Above Average
33 – 38 19 20.21% High Average

38
27 – 32 50 53.19% Average
23 – 26 12 12.77% Low Average
11 – 17 3 3.19% Low
Total 94 100%
terms of their peer relationship. Three respondents at 3.19% are above
average in terms of peer relationship. Nineteen of the participants are high
average at 20.21%. Fifty of the respondents at 53.19% are average, this is
the highest rate among the subjects. Twelve of the respondents at 12.77%
are low average. Seven of the subjects who participated are below average at
7.45%. And 3 of the subjects at 3.19% are low.
The collected data shows that among the respondents, majority of them
are average with regards to their peer relationship manifested in their use of
social media. The results shows that the respondents moderately interact and
socialize with their friends through their social media use.

the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of Academics
Item Item Statement Weighted Weighted Verbal

39
How often do you find yourself

getting distracted by social
4 media while studying? (e.g. 375 3.99 Often
receiving messages, updates,
snaps, etc.)
How often do you use social 357 3.80 Often

5
media while studying?
1 How often do you study? 332 3.53 Often

favoring spending time on
3 332 3.53 Often
social media sites rather than
studying?
Does social media help you

excel in your studies?
How often do you neglect your

2 studies in favor of spending 316 3.36 Sometimes
time on social media?

8 posting or updating your 242 2.57 Sometimes
accounts instead of studying?
Does social media make you

7 216 2.30 Rarely
fail in your studies?
How often do you find your

social life on social media more
9 208 2.21 Rarely
important than your academic
career?
Do you feel as though your

10 social life is more important 178 1.89 Rarely
than your academics?
40
OVERALL MEAN 3.06
Academics relate to the work done in schools, colleges, and universities,
especially work which involves studying and reasoning rather than practical or
technical skills. In table 8, it can be seen that for four item numbers 1, 3, 4,
and 5, most of the respondents answered “Often.” Items 2, 6, and 8 acquired
a “sometimes” response from majority of the respondents. And item numbers
7, 9, and 10 obtained a “rarely” response from the respondents.
do you find yourself getting distracted by social media while studying? (e.g.
receiving messages, updates, snaps, etc.)” obtained an “often” response from
the participants. This is a bad indication as it shows that the respondents often
get distracted by social media when they do their academics. The item that
got the next highest weighted score is “How often do you use social media
while studying?” which also obtained an “Often” response. This could have a
good indication that the respondents use social media as a tool for their
studies. The next items got the same weighted score. The first one is “How
often do you study?” this is a good indication as it shows that most of the
respondents seem to give more importance to their studies despite of the
presence of social media around them. The next one is “How often do you find
yourself favoring spending time on social media sites rather than studying?”
41
which has a bad indication as it shows that the respondents seem to prioritize
their social media use over their studies.
For the item “Does social media help you excel in your studies?” most
of the respondents answered “sometimes”. This shows that the respondents
seem to find social media, on an occasional basis, as a medium for improving
their academic pursuit. Most respondents answered “sometimes” also for the
items “How often do you neglect your studies in favor of spending time on
social media?” and “How often do you find yourself posting or updating your
accounts instead of studying?” This has a bad indication because it seems that
the respondents sometimes put more importance in their social media use
instead of their studies.
For the item “Does social media make you fail in your studies?” it
obtained a “rarely” response from the respondents which indicates that the
respondents’ use of social media rarely affects their academic achievement
despite of being distracted by it oftentimes. The items “How often do you find
your social life on social media more important than your academic career?”
and also the item that got the lowest score “Do you feel as though your social
life is more important than your academics?“ which both got a response of
“rarely” shows that the respondents do still prioritize their studies even with
their seldom use of social media.

42

College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of Academics
Verbal
Interpretation
39 – 45 4 4.26% Above Average
33 – 38 30 31.91% High Average
27 – 32 42 44.68% Average
23 – 26 12 12.77% Low Average
Total 94 100%
terms of their academics. Four respondents at 4.26% are above average in
terms of academics. Thirty respondents are rated high average at 31.91%.
Forty-two of the participants are average at 44.68%, this is the highest rate
among the subjects. Twelve of the respondents at 12.77% are low average.
And six of the respondents at 6.38% are below average.
are average with regards to their academics manifested in their use of social
media. The result shows that the respondents put moderate priority in their
academic pursuit.
43

the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of Social Networking

Item Statement
How often do you use

8 427 4.54 Always
Youtube?
6 How often do you use Google? 422 4.49 Often

1 412 4.38 Often
Facebook?

3 331 3.52 Often
Instagram?
2 How often do you use Twitter? 305 3.24 Sometimes

4 204 2.17 Rarely
Snapchat?
7 How often do you use Yahoo? 199 2.12 Rarely
5 How often do you use Tumblr? 130 1.38 Never
OVERALL MEAN 3.23
Social Networking is the use of dedicated websites and applications to
interact with other users, or to find people with similar interests to oneself. In
table 10, it can be seen that item number 9 obtained an “always” response
from the respondents.” For three item numbers 1, 3, and 6, most of the
respondents answered “Often.” Item 2 acquired a “sometimes” response from

44
majority of the respondents. And item numbers 4, 5, and 7 obtained a “rarely”
response from the respondents.
do you use Youtube?” obtained an “always” response from the participants.
This is indicates that the respondents enjoy using youtube as a form of
entertainment.
The item that got the next highest weighted score is “How often do you
use Google?” which obtained an “Often” response. This indicates that the
respondents often use Google as a form of search engine. The next items that
got also an “often” response from the respondents are “How often do you use
Facebook?” and “How often do you use Instagram” which indicates that the
respondents often use Facebook and Instagram as their mode of socializing
with others.
For the item “How often do you use Twitter?” most of the respondents
answered “sometimes”. This shows that the respondents seem to find Twitter,
on an occasional basis, as a medium for interacting with others.
For the items “How often do you use snapchat?” and “How often do you
use Yahoo?” these obtained a “rarely” response from the respondents which
indicates that the respondents only rarely uses Snapchat and Yahoo to get
acquainted with others.

45
And lastly, the item that got the lowest score “How often do you use
Tumblr?” gained a “never” response from participants which shows that the
respondents are not familiar with this social media platform and never uses it
in their social networking.

College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of Social Networking
Verbal
Interpretation
33 – 38 5 5.32% High Average
27 – 32 43 45.74% Average
23 – 26 25 26.60% Low Average
18 – 22 16 17.02% Below Average
11 – 17 5 5.32% Low
Total 94 100%
terms of their social networking. Five respondents at 5.32% are high average
in terms of social networking. Forty three respondents are rated average at
45.74%, this is the highest rate among the subjects. Twenty five of the
46
participants are low average at 26.60%. Sixteen of the participants at 17.02%
are below average. Five of the respondents at 5.32% are low.
are average with regards to their social networking manifested in their use of
social media. The result shows that the respondents moderately build social
networks or social relations with other people who share similar personal or
career interests, activities, backgrounds or real-life connections through social
networking.
Table 12 - Edwards Personal Preference Schedule Classification of

the Generation Z of the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms
of Achievement
Verbal
Interpretation
97 - above 1 1.06% Very High
85 – 96 8 8.51% High
17 – 84 74 78.72% Average
4 – 16 9 9.57% Low
1–3 2 2.13% Very Low
Total 94 100%
Achievement Personality Preference is the need to do one’s best, to be
successful, to accomplish take requiring skill and effort to be recognized

47
authority, to accomplish something of great significance, to do a difficult job
well, to solve difficult problems and puzzles, to be able to do things better
than others, and to write a great novel or play.
terms of achievement personality preference. One (1) of the respondents at
1.06% is rated very high. Eight (8) of the participants at 8.51% are rated
high. Seventy four (74) of the participants are average at 78.72%, this is the
highest rate among the subjects. Nine (9) respondents are rated low at
9.57%. Two (2) respondents at 2.13% are rated very low in terms of
achievement personality preference. The collected data shows that among the
respondents, majority of them are average with regards to their achievement
personality preference. Having a score of Average in this subscale means that
Generation Z of the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac shows a moderate need
to accomplish tasks well

of Deference
Verbal
Interpretation
85 – 96 12 12.77% High
17 – 84 71 75.53% Average
48
4 – 16 9 9.57% Low
1–3 1 1.06% Very Low
Total 94 100%
Deference Personality Preference is the need to get suggestions from
others, to find out what others think, to follow instructions and do that is
expected, to praise others, to tell others that they have done a good job, to
accept leadership of others, to read about great man, to conform to custom
and avoid the unconventional, and to let others make decisions.
terms of deference personality preference. One (1) of the respondents at
1.06% is rated very high. Twelve (12) of the participants at 12.77% are rated
high. Seventy one (71) of the participants are average at 75.53%, this is the
highest rate among the subjects. Nine (9) respondents are rated low at
9.57%. One (1) respondent at 1.06% is rated very low in terms of deference
personality preference. The collected data shows that among the respondents,
majority of them are average with regards to their deference personality
preference. Having a score of Average in this subscale, this could be
interpreted as having a moderate need to conform to customs and defer to
others.
49

of Order
Verbal
Interpretation
85 – 96 31 32.98% High
17 – 84 48 51.06% Average
4 – 16 4 4.26% Low
Total 94 100%
Order Personality Preference is the need to have written work neat and
organized, to make plans before starting on a difficult task, to have things
organized, to keep things neat and order, to make advance plans when taking
a trip, to organize details of work, to keep letters and files according to some
system, to have meals organized and a definite time for eating, and to have
things arranged so that they run smoothly without change.
terms of order personality preference. Eleven (11) of the respondents at
1.06% are rated very high. Thirty one (31) of the participants at 32.98% are
rated high. Forty eight (48) of the participants are average at 51.06%, this is
the highest rate among the subjects. Four (4) respondents are rated low at
50
4.26% in terms of order personality preference. The collected data shows that
among the respondents, majority of them are average with regards to their
order personality preference. Having a score of Average in this subscale, this
shows that the participants have a less extreme need to plan well and be
organized.

of Exhibition
Verbal
Interpretation
85 – 96 9 9.57% High
17 - 84 51 54.26% Average
4 – 16 23 24.47% Low
1-3 9 9.57% Very Low
Total 94 100%
Exhibition Personality Preference is the need to say witty and endeavor
things, to tell amusing jokes and stories, to talk about personal adventures
and experiences, to have others notice and comment upon one's appearance,
to say things just to see what effect it will have on others, to talk about
51
personal achievements, to be the center of attention, to use words that others
do not know the meaning of, and to ask questions others cannot answer.
terms of exhibition personality preference. Two (2) of the respondents at
2.13% are rated very high. Nine (9) of the participants at 9.57% are rated
high. Fifty one (51) of the participants are average at 54.26%, this is the
highest rate among the subjects. Twenty three (23) respondents are rated
low at 24.47%. Nine (9) respondents at 9.57% are rated very low in terms of
exhibition personality preference. The collected data shows that among the
respondents, majority of them are average with regards to their exhibition
personality preference. Having a score of Average in this subscale, this goes
to show that the Gen Z displays a middling need to be the center of attention
in a group.

of Autonomy
Verbal
Interpretation
85 - 96 15 15.96% High
17 - 84 70 74.47% Average
52
4 - 16 7 7.45% Low
1-3 1 1.06% Very Low
Total 94 100%
Autonomy Personality Preference is the need to be able to come and go
as desired, to say what one thinks about things, to be independent of others
in making decisions, to feel free to do what one wants, to do things that are
unconventional, to avoid situations where one is expected to conform, to do
things without regard to what others may think, and to criticize those in
positions of authority, to world responsibilities and obligations.
terms of autonomy personality preference. One (1) of the respondents at
1.06% is rated very high. Fifteen (15) of the participants at 15.96% are rated
high. Seventy (70) of the participants are average at 74.47%, this is the
highest rate among the subjects. Seven (7) respondents are rated low at
7.45%. One (1) respondent at 1.06% is rated very low in terms of autonomy
majority of them are average with regards to their autonomy personality
preference. Having a score of Average in this subscale, this could mean that
their need to be free of responsibilities and obligations is on a standard level
only.
53

of Affiliation
Verbal
Interpretation
97 - above 0 0% Very High
85 - 96 4 4.26% High
17 - 84 62 65.96% Average
4 - 16 18 19.15% Low
1-3 10 10.64% Very Low
Total 94 100%
Affiliation Personality Preference is the need to be loyal to friends, to
participate in friendly groups, to do things for friends, to form new,
friendships, to make as many friends as possible, to share things with friends,
to do things with friends rather than alone, and to form strong attachments.
terms of affiliation personality preference. Four (5) of the participants at
4.26% are rated high. Sixty two (62) of the participants are average at
65.96%, this is the highest rate among the subjects. Eighteen (18)
respondents are rated low at 19.15%. Ten (10) respondents at 10.46% are
rated very low in terms of affiliation personality preference. The collected data
54
shows that among the respondents, majority of them are average with regards
to their affiliation personality preference. Having a score of Average in this
subscale, this reveals that the respondents need to form strong friendships
and attachments is of moderate level.

of Intraception
Verbal
Interpretation
85 - 96 7 7.45% High
17 – 84 75 79.79% Average
4 – 16 11 11.70% Low
1-3 0 0% Very Low
Total 94 100%
Intraception Personality Preference is the need to analyze one's motives
and feelings, to observe others, to understand how others feel about
problems, to put one self in another's place, to judge people by why they do
55
things rather than by what they do, to analyze the behavior of others, to
analyze the motives of others, to predict how others will act.
terms of intraception personality preference. One (1) of the respondents at
1.06% is rated very high. Seven (7) of the participants at 7.45% are rated
high. Seventy five (75) of the participants are average at 79.79%, this is the
highest rate among the subjects. Eleven (11) respondents are rated low at
11.70% in terms of intraception personality preference. The collected data
to their intraception personality preference. Having a score of Average in this
subscale, this entails that the subjects moderately need to analyze behaviors
and feelings of others.

of Succorance
Verbal
Interpretation
85 - 96 24 25.53% High
17 - 84 64 68.09% Average
56
4 - 16 3 3.19% Low
1-3 0 0% Very Low
Total 94 100%
Succorance Personality Preference is the need to ask others’ help when
in trouble, to seek encouragement from others, to have others be sympathetic
and understanding about personal problems, to receive a great deal of
affection from others, to be helped by others when depressed, to have others
feel sorry when one is sick, and to have a fuss made over one when hurt.
terms of succorance personality preference. Three (3) of the respondents at
3.19% are rated very high. Twenty four (24) of the participants at 25.53%
are rated high. Sixty four (64) of the participants are average at 68.09%, this
is the highest rate among the subjects. Three (3) respondents are rated low
at 3.19% in terms of succorance personality preference. The collected data
to their succorance personality preference. Having a score of Average in this
subscale, this displays that the Generation Z have a moderate need to receive
support and attention from others.

57

of Dominance
Verbal
Interpretation
85 - 96 6 6.38% High
17 - 84 64 68.09% Average
4 - 16 22 23.40% Low
1-3 1 1.06% Very Low
Total 94 100%
Dominance Personality Preference is the need to argue for one's point
of view, to be a leader in groups to which one belongs, to be regarded by
others as a leader, to be elected or appointed chairman of committees, to
make group decisions, to settle arguments and dispute between others, to
persuade and influence others to do what one wants, to supervise and direct
the actions of others, and to tell others how to do their jobs.
terms of dominance personality preference. One (1) of the respondent at
1.06% is rated very high. Six (6) of the participants at 6.38% are rated high.
Sixty four (64) of the participants are average at 68.09%, this is the highest
58
rate among the subjects. Twenty two (22) respondents are rated low at
23.40%. One (1) respondent at 1.06% is rated very low in terms of dominance
majority of them are average with regards to their dominance personality
preference. Having a score of Average in this subscale, this means that the
Post-Millenials’ need to be a leader and influence others is on an average level.

of Abasement
Verbal
Interpretation
85 - 96 21 22.34% High
17 - 84 70 74.47% Average
4 - 16 1 1.06% Low
1-3 0 0% Very Low
Total 94 100%
Abasement Personality Preference is the need to feel guilty when one
does something wrong, to accept blame when things do not go right, to feel
that personal pain and misery suffered does more good than harm, to feel the
need for punishment for wrong doing, to feel better when giving in and
59
avoiding a fight then when having one's own way, to feel the need for
confession of errors, to feel depressed by inability to handle situations, to feel
timid in the presence of superiors, and to feel inferior to others in most
respects.
terms of abasement personality preference. Two (2) of the respondent at
2.13% are rated very high. Twenty one (21) of the participants at 22.34% are
rated high. Seventy (70) of the participants are average at 74.47%, this is
the highest rate among the subjects. One (1) respondent at 1.06% is rated
low in terms of abasement personality preference. The collected data shows
that among the respondents, majority of them are average with regards to
their abasement personality preference. Having a score of Average in this
subscale, this could mean that the respondents may tend to moderately need
to accept blame for problems and confess errors to others.

of Nurturance
Verbal
Interpretation
85 - 96 14 14.89% High
17 - 84 71 75.53% Average
60
4 - 16 5 5.32% Low
1-3 3 3.19% Very Low
Total 94 100%
Nurturance Personality Preference is the need to help friends when they
are in trouble, to assist others with kindness and sympathy, to forgive others,
to do small favors for others, to be generous with others, to sympathize with
others who are hurt or sick, to show a great deal of affection toward others,
and to have others confide in one about personal problems.
terms of nurturance personality preference. One (1) of the respondent at
1.06% is rated very high. Fourteen (14) of the participants at 14.89% are
rated high. Seventy one (71) of the participants are average at 75.53%, this
is the highest rate among the subjects. Five (5) respondents are rated low at
5.32%. Three (3) respondents at 3.19% are rated very low in terms of
nurturance personality preference. The collected data shows that among the
respondents, majority of them are average with regards to their nurturance
personality preference. Having a score of Average in this subscale, this is
interpreted as the Gen Z having a standard level need to be of assistance to
others.
61

of Change
Verbal
Interpretation
85 - 96 15 15.96% High
17 - 84 68 72.34% Average
4 - 16 6 6.38% Low
1-3 0 0% Very Low
Total 94 100%
Change Personality Preference is the need to do new and different
things, to travel, to meet new people, to experience novelty and change in
daily routine, to experiment and try new things, to eat in chew and different
places, to try new different jobs, to move about the country and live in
different places, and to participate in new fads and fashions.
terms of change personality preference. Five (5) of the respondent at 5.32%
are rated very high. Fifteen (15) of the participants at 15.96% are rated high.
Sixty eight (68) of the participants are average at 72.34%, this is the highest
rate among the subjects. Six (6) respondents are rated low at 6.38% in terms
62
of change personality preference. The collected data shows that among the
respondents, majority of them are average with regards to their change
personality preference. Having a score of Average in this subscale, this shows
that subjects moderately need to seek new experiences and avoid routine.

of Endurance
Verbal
Interpretation
85 - 96 11 11.70% High
17 - 84 78 82.98% Average
4 – 16 3 3.19% Low
1-3 0 0% Very Low
Total 94 100%
Endurance Personality Preference is the need to keep doing a job until
it is finished, to complete any job undertaken, to work hard at a task, to keeps
solving a puzzle or problem until it is solved, to work at a single job before
taking on others, to stay up late working in order to get a job done, to put in
63
long hours of work without distraction, to stick at a problem even though it
may seem as if no progress is being made, and to avoid being interrupted
while at work.
terms of endurance personality preference. Two (2) of the respondent at
2.13% are rated very high. Eleven (11) of the participants at 11.70% are
rated high. Seventy eight (78) of the participants are average at 82.98%, this
is the highest rate among the subjects. Three (3) respondents at 3.19% are
rated low in terms of endurance personality preference. The collected data
to their endurance personality preference. Having a score of Average in this
subscale, this means that the respondents have an average level of need to
follow through on tasks and complete assignments.

of Heterosexuality
Verbal
Interpretation
85 - 96 1 1.06% High
17 - 84 51 54.26% Average
64
4 - 16 22 23.40% Low
1-3 19 20.21% Very Low
Total 94 100%
Heterosexuality Personality Preferences is the need to go out with
members of the opposite sex, to engage in social activities with the opposite
sex, to be in love with someone of the opposite sex, and to be regarded as
physically attractive by those of the opposite sex.
terms of heterosexuality personality preference. One (1) of the respondents
at 1.06% is rated very high. One (1) of the participants at 1.06% is rated
high. Fifty one (51) of the participants are average at 54.26%, this is the
highest rate among the subjects. Twenty two (22) respondents are rated low
at 23.40%. Nineteen (19) respondents at 20.21% are rated very low in terms
of heterosexuality personality preference. The collected data shows that
among the respondents, majority of them are average with regards to their
heterosexuality personality preference. Having a score of Average in this
subscale means that they tend to need to be associated with and attractive to
members of the opposite sex but only on a moderate level only.

65

of Aggression
Verbal
Interpretation
85 - 96 18 19.15% High
17 - 84 69 73.40% Average
4 - 16 0 0% Low
1-3 2 2.13% Very Low
Total 94 100%
Aggression Personality Preference is the need to attack others’ points of
view, to tell others what one thinks about them, to criticize others publicly, to
make fun of others, to tell others off when disagreeing with them, to get
revenge for insults, to become angry, and to blame others when things go
wrong.
terms of aggression personality preference. Five (5) of the respondents at
5.32% are rated very high. Eighteen (18) of the participants at 19.15% are
rated high. Sixty nine (69) of the participants are average at 73.40%, this is
the highest rate among the subjects. Two (2) respondents at 2.13% are rated
66
very low in terms of aggression personality preference. The collected data
to their aggression personality preference. Having a score of Average in this
subscale means that they moderately need to express one's opinion and be
critical of others.
Table 27- Correlation Between Family Relationship and the

Personality Preferences of the Generation Z of the College of the
Holy Spirit of Tarlac
Personality Pearson Computed Tabular

Interpretation Interpretation
Preferences (r) t-Value t-Value
Very High
Achievement 0.98 14.96 1.99 Significant
Correlation
Very High
Deference 0.97 12.86 1.99 Significant
Correlation
Very High
Order 0.99 34 1.99 Significant
Correlation
Very High
Exhibition 0.94 16.59 1.99 Significant
Correlation
Very High
Autonomy 0.97 11.27 1.99 Significant
Correlation
Very High
Affiliation 0.95 23.09 1.99 Significant
Correlation
Very High
Intraception 0.97 17.84 1.99 Significant
Correlation
Succorance 0.96 Very High 7.96 1.99 Significant

67
Correlation
Very High
Dominance 0.95 19.16 1.99 Significant
Correlation
Very High
Abasement 0.97 9.42 1.99 Significant
Correlation
Very High
Nurturance 0.97 13.14 1.99 Significant
Correlation
Very High
Change 0.97 10.57 1.99 Significant
Correlation
Very High
Endurance 0.99 13.33 1.99 Significant
Correlation
Very High
Heterosexuality 0.93 27.26 1.99 Significant
Correlation
Very High
Aggression 0.97 9.22 1.99 Significant
Correlation
As presented in table 27 above, there is a very high correlation and
significant relationship between the personality preferences, in all fifteen
subscales, and the family relationship subscale on social media of the
Generation Z of the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac. The results indicate a
direct relationship between the family relationship and the fifteen subscales of
personality preferences namely; Achievement, Deference, Order, Exhibition,
Autonomy, Affiliation, Intraception, Succorance, Dominance, Abasement,
Nurturance, Change, Endurance, Heterosexuality, and Aggression.

68
The effects of family can substantially influence one's personality,
behaviours, beliefs and values, which correlates positively to the life
experiences. Research has shown the significance of family interactions on
stress levels, personality and behavioural traits on younger individuals. The
young ones imitate the elders as they have yet to be independent and this
process is considered to be an aspect of evolution.
(https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Family-Influences-Our-Personality-
Behavior-Beliefs-and-FKR6SGSTJ)
Table 28 - Correlation Between Peer Relationship and the


Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Order 0.98 16.99 1.99 Significant
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
69
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Succorance 0.94 5.97 1.99 Significant
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Endurance 0.98 11 1.99 Significant
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
As presented in table 28 above, there is a very high and significant
correlation between the personality preferences, in all fifteen subscales, and
the peer relationship subscale on social media of the Generation Z of the
College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac. The results indicate a direct relationship
between the peer relationship and the fifteen subscales of personality
preferences namely; Achievement, Deference, Order, Exhibition, Autonomy,

70
Affiliation, Intraception, Succorance, Dominance, Abasement, Nurturance,
Change, Endurance, Heterosexuality, and Aggression.
Peers are a pervasive aspect of our social lives that impact us from
childhood to old age. One of approaches that explicitly considered the role of
peers in personality development is group socialization theory (Harris, 1995).
The theory posits that with children’s advancing age, outside-the-home
socialization that takes place in peer groups becomes an increasingly
important determinant of adolescents’ personality development.
Table 29 - Correlation Between Academics and the Personality

Preferences of the Generation Z of the College of the Holy Spirit of
Tarlac
Personality Pearson Interpretation Computed Tabular

Interpretation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Affiliation 0.95 Very High 21.85 1.99 Significant

71
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Aggression 0.98 8 1.99 Significant
Correlation
As presented in table 29 above, there is a very high correlation and
significant relationship between the personality preferences, in all fifteen
subscales, and the academics subscale on social media of the Generation Z of
the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac. The results indicate a direct relationship
between the academics and the fifteen subscales of personality preferences

72
namely; Achievement, Deference, Order, Exhibition, Autonomy, Affiliation,
Intraception, Succorance, Dominance, Abasement, Nurturance, Change,
Endurance, Heterosexuality, and Aggression.
There is evidence that personality traits can predict academic motivation
and achievement. O’Connor and Paunonen (2007) consider three rationales
for the evaluation of personality traits as predictors of students’ academic
achievement. First, there are behavioral tendencies reflected in personality
traits that can affect certain habits that influence academic achievement such.
Second, whereas cognitive ability reflects what an individual can do,
personality traits reflect what an individual will do. Third, personality as well
as cognitive proficiency would predict subsequent performance better in
students, especially motivation-related personality variables.
Table 30 - Correlation Between Social Networking and the


Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
73
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
Very High
Correlation
As presented in table 28 above, there is a very high and significant
correlation between the personality preferences, in all fifteen subscales, and

74
the peer relationship subscale on social media of the Generation Z of the
College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac. The results indicate a direct relationship
between social networking and the fifteen subscales of personality preferences
namely; Achievement, Deference, Order, Exhibition, Autonomy, Affiliation,
Intraception, Succorance, Dominance, Abasement, Nurturance, Change,
Endurance, Heterosexuality, and Aggression.
It is a well-known fact that individual differences, such as, age, gender,
and personality lead the usage of mass media (Rosengren, 1974). Since the
rise of social media, relationship between social media usage and personality
has considered in a numerous number of studies (Correa et al., 2010; Ryan
and Xenos, 2011). The social networks websites that are seen as new
tools for personality and identity formation provide the individuals with
chance to express themselves (Mehdizadeh, 2010). The social networks
allowing the persons to freely define and express themselves are used by the
users for various purposes. These purposes vary between the individuals, as
well as the duration of use and the network websites being used also vary.
75
CHAPTER V
THE PROPOSED FAMILY-BASED INTERVENTION PROGRAM
The following is the proposed family-based intervention program for the
effect of social media on the personality preferences of the Generation Z of
the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac
Program Time Persons Expected

Objectives
Frame Involved Output
- Generation Z
students of the
To provide College of the
awareness of Holy spirit of Gained
Group
how the effect Tarlac awareness of
discussion on 1 meeting
of social media the responsible
the effects of for the
on one’s well- - Guidance use of the
social media, month of
being could Counselor, internet and
both positive July
have pros and Psychologist social media
and negative
cons and Program
Coordinator of
the Psychology
department
- Students who
misuse social
media learned
to control and
moderate their
To assist post
use of different
Session on millennials in - Students
3 meetings social
overcoming averting their
for the networking
resistance to misuse of - Guidance
month of platforms
changing social media Counselor and
July
behavior Psychologist
- Transformed
negative
personality of
the generation
z into positive
ones
- To let the Parents learned
Group 2 meetings - Parents of
parents of the how to correctly
discussion the for the the
post deal with their
impact of the month of respondents
millennials child’s misuse
child’s Internet August
become of social media
76
misuse on informed of - Guidance and how they

parents’ lives how internet Counselor, could cope up
misuse could Psychologist with their
adversely and Program child’s behavior
affect their Coordinator of
child’s well- the Psychology
being department
- To let the
parents
become aware
of why their
child acts the
way they
behave due to
misuse of
social media
- Resolved
- To release conflicts,
pent-up corrected
emotion and behavior of the
express child, and
- Students
affection to fostered
Joint one another communication
- Parents of
adolescent and 4 sessions between
the
parent - To encourage for the parents and
respondents
emotional post month of children
catharsis millennials to September
- Guidance
session connect with - Improved
Counselor and
people in their functioning of
Psychologist
environment the post-
more than they millennials in
connect with real-life setting
others virtually more than the
virtual world
- To acquaint
the Guidance Teachers,
- Teachers
Staff and guidance staff
Teachers the coordinators
- Guidance
Intervention mechanics of and
Counselors,
Program for the family- October to psychologist are
Psychologist
Guidance Staff based February better equipped
and Psychology
and Teachers intervention to handle
Program
program students’
department
problems and
coordinator
- For teachers difficulties
to acquire
77
skills in
identifying
students’
Academic
difficulties and
problems in
relation to how
their
personality is
affected by
their social
media use
The last
session is
- Teachers
intended for
verbal and
- Guidance
written Holistic
Counselors,
evaluation approach to the
Evaluation of Psychologist,
which would factors affecting
the family- and Psychology
serve to personality
based March Program
measure to preferences of
intervention department
which the students with
program Coordinator
effectiveness use of social
of the family- media
- Parents
based
intervention
- Students
program
extends
78
CHAPTER VI
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This chapter presents the summary of findings, conclusions derived from
the findings, and the significant recommendations based on the gathered data
among the respondents.
Summary
This study was conducted in the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac to
determine the effect of social media on the personality preferences of the
generation z. There were ninety four (94) students who participated in the
study. Seventy two (72) are females and twenty two (22) are males.
Descriptive-Correlation method was used in this study. The researcher used a
Likert questionnaire-method and the Edwards Personality Preferences
Schedule test to collect the data needed for the research.
Findings:
According to the Demographic Profile:
1.1. Most of the respondents are 17 years old
1.2. Most of the respondents are females
According to the Use of Different Social Networks
2.1. 94 out of 94 (100%) of the respondents use facebook

79
2.2. 69 out of 94 (73.4%) of the respondents use Twitter
2.3. 78 out of 94 (83%) of the respondents use Instagram
2.4. 55 out of 94 (58.5%) of the respondents use Snapchat
2.5. 18 out of 94 (19.1%) of the respondents use Tumblr
2.6. 88 out of 94 (93.6%) of the respondents use Google
2.7. 51 out of 94 (54.3%) of the respondents use Yahoo
2.8. 82 out of 94 (87.2%) of the respondents use Youtube
According the Effect of Social Media:
3.1. The effect of social media on the Family Relationship on majority of
the respondents is high average
3.2. The effect of social media on the Peer Relationship on majority of
the respondents is above average
3.3. The effect of social media on the Academics on majority of the
respondents is high average
3.4. The effect of social media on the Social Networking on majority of
the respondents is high average

80
According to Personality Preferences:
4.1. The Personality Preference of majority of the respondents in terms
of Achievement is average
of Deference is average
of Order is average
of Exhibition is average
of Autonomy is average
of Affiliation is average
of Intraception is average
of Succorance is average
of Dominance is average
81
of Abasement is average
of Nurturance is average
of Change is average
of Endurance is average
of Heterosexuality is average
of Aggression is average
According to Significant Correlation:
5. There is a significant relationship between the use of social media and
the personality preferences of the generation z of the College of the Holy Spirit
of Tarlac
82
According to Intervention Program:
6. A proposed family-based intervention program for the effect of
social media on the personality preferences of the Generation Z of the College
of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac
Conclusion
The participants’ use of social media has a significant effect the
personality preferences of the respondents with result of 0.96 computed
Pearson Correlation. It indicates a very high value of correlation. Likewise, it
is significant as well since the computed t-value of 12.26 is higher than the
tabular t-value of 1.99.
The findings signify that there is a significant relationship between the
use of social media and the personality preferences of the Generation Z of the
College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac. The results indicate that the way the
respondents use different social networking platforms can affect the subjects’
characteristic set of behavior and preferences.
Recommendations
The results of this study may need further research, thus the following
recommendations are made:

83
1. Members of Generation Z, especially students, become more aware of
what they are using on the internet, how to responsibly use it, and give
them insight how it affects their overall behavior and action.
2. Parents must monitor how their child uses social media. Since the use
of different social networks has a diverse effect on a person’s
personality, parents must be aware of what things might adversely
influence their child’s behavior and give restrictions with regards to it.
3. For future researchers, this will serve as their guide and basis for their
future research.
4. The results of the study be forwarded to the administrators, teachers,
and guidance counselors for further information.
5. A similar study must be conducted to different generation age ranges to
further validate the present findings on a wider scope of sample.

84
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A. BOOKS
Angeles, Marie Paz H. and Villavicencio, Editha Quizon, TCS - Publishing

House (2008) Psychology, A simplified approach in understanding
human behavior
Del Rosario, Maria Theresa O., Gregorio, Anna Marie B., and Matammu,
Lulette U., Mutya Publishing House, INC. (2012) General Psychology
85
Rogelia P. and Elizabeth M., Asian Journal of Social Psychology (2000)

Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino Psychology) A Legacy of Virgilio G. Enriuez
Tulio, Doris D., National Book Store (2012) A Breakthrough in School Guidance
& Counseling
Wade, Carol and Tavris, Carol, Harper Collins Publishers (2009) Psychology
2nd Edition
B. UNPUBLISHED MATERIALS
Deang, Kiara Austin Mika A., Dulay, Angela Nicole P., Marcelo, Rohann Cris A.,
Yunque, Vianna Gaudiosa R. (2018) The Significant Effect of Social
Media to the Emotional Well-Being of the Grades 9 and 10 Learners of
Holy Spirit School, Cubao, Quezon City
C. INTERNET MATERIALS
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1055526.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292464461_A_literature_review_
on_personality_creativity_and_innovative_behavior
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01065479
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/j.2164-
4918.1959.tb02530.x
https://ecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2199&context=luc_th
eses
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656618301260
https://hbr.org/2017/08/a-survey-of-19-countries-shows-how-generations-
x-y-and-z-are-and-arent-different
86
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325598279_Linking_Personality_
With_Interpersonal_Perception_in_the_Classroom_Distinct_Associations_Wit
h_the_Social_and_Academic_Sides_of_Popularity
https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1039&context=or
pc
https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=839
http://www.academia.edu/10780269/Ang_Pagkawala_at_ang_Pagbabago_n
g_mga_Piling_Kulturang_Pilipino
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232521976_Personality_Research
_in_a_Non-Western_Culture_The_Philippines
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/57dd/369935d6ce268d78382de206fc8eb06
6bbbd.pdf
http://oaji.net/articles/2016/490-1468583117.pdf
https://www.temperament.com/personality.html
https://www.allpsych.com/personalitysynopsis/temperament/
https://www.verywell.com/personality-psychology-study-guide-2795699
https://vulcanpost.com/12971/research-philippines-social-media/
https://www.fma.ph/?p=261
87
https://www.motionpoint.com/blog/social-media-in-japan/
Htt[s://www.pewinternet.org/2015/20/18/social-networking-usage-2005-
2015/
https://www.extradigital.co.uk/articles/social-media/social-media-use-
france.html
https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Family-Influences-Our-Personality-
Behavior-Beliefs-and-FKR6SGSTJ
88
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - Letter to the Principal
August 25, 2018

89
SISTER MARIETTA DUMADAG, S.S.P.S.

School Principal
Dear Sister:
Greetings in the name of the Holy Triune God!
I am a fourth year college student taking up Bachelor of Science in Psychology of this
institution presently conducting a research entitled "THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL MEDIA ON
THE PERSONALITY PREFERENCES OF THE GENERATION Z OF THE COLLEGE OF THE
HOLY SPIRIT OF TARLAC: A BASIS FOR AN INTERVENTION PROGRAM".
In this regard, the undersigned request the approval of your good office to conduct
the data gathering and collection on the month of August and September.
Your approval to this request is highly appreciated. Thank you and God bless.
Respectfully yours, Noted by:
ANGELIKA M. MANALESE SISTER MYRNA BATITAY, S. S.P.S.

Researcher Research Adviser
Recommending Approval:
SISTER FLORENCIA TUBAÑA, S.S.P.S. SISTER MARIETTA DUMADAG, S.S.P.S.

Dean/Directress Principal
APPENDIX B - Letter to the Directress
August 25, 2018

90
SISTER FLORENCIA TUBAÑA, S.S.P.S.

School Dean/Directress
Dear Sister:
I am a fourth year college student taking up Bachelor of Science in Psychology of this
institution presently conducting a research entitled "THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL MEDIA ON
THE PERSONALITY PREFERENCES OF THE GENERATION Z OF THE COLLEGE OF THE
HOLY SPIRIT OF TARLAC: A BASIS FOR AN INTERVENTION PROGRAM".
In this regard, the undersigned request the approval of your good office to conduct
the data gathering and collection on the month of August and September.
Your approval to this request is highly appreciated. Thank you and God bless.
Respectfully yours, Noted by:
ANGELIKA M. MANALESE SISTER MYRNA BATITAY, S. S.P.S.

Researcher Research Adviser
Recommending Approval:
SISTER FLORENCIA TUBAÑA, S.S.P.S. SISTER MARIETTA DUMADAG, S.S.P.S.

Dean/Directress Principal
APPENDIX C - Letter to the Guidance Center

91
August 25, 2018

SISTER MYRNA BATITAY, S.S.P.S., PH.D.
Guidance Coordinator
College of the Holy Spirit
Dear Sr. Myrna, and the Guidance Staff of the College and Upper Basic Education Department:
I, Angelika M. Manalese, a 4th year student of the Psychology Department of the
College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac, presently conducting a research entitled "THE EFFECT
OF SOCIAL MEDIA ON THE PERSONALITY PREFERENCES OF THE GENERATION Z OF
THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY SPIRIT OF TARLAC: A BASIS FOR AN INTERVENTION
PROGRAM". In line with this, I would like to ask for your approval to allow me to administer
to one hundred nine (109) learners from the college department, fifty (50) grade eleven
learners and another fifty (50) grade twelve learners from the Upper Basic Education
Department of the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac. The data and information that will be
acquired from the test will be used in my undergraduate thesis and will be classified as
confidential.
Your approval in this requirement is highly appreciated
Thank you and God bless!
Respectfully yours,
ANGELIKA M. MANALESE
Researcher, BS-Psychology IV
Approved by:
SISTER MYRNA BATITAY, S. S.P.S.

Guidance Coordinator
APPENDIX D - QUESTIONNAIRE
92
Researcher Self-Made Questionnaire on the Social Media
Name (optional) ______________________________________ Age: _____

Gender: □ Female □ Male
INSTRUCTIONS: Read each sentence carefully then put a check mark in the box
pertaining to the rating and answer which best suit you. ALWAYS (5) being the
highest and NEVER (1) as the lowest. Use the following scales below:
5 – Always 3 – Sometimes 1 – Never

4 – Often 2 – Rarely
Item FAMILY RELATIONSHIP

5 4 3 2 1
No. Item Statement
1 How often do you eat with your family?
2 How often do you meet/get together with
your family?
3 How often do you go out with your family
(e.g. go to the mall, museum, park,
etc.)?
4 How often do you open up about your
feelings and/or thoughts to your family?
5 How often do you use social media
whenever you are with your family?
6 How often do you interact with your
family through social media?
family outside of social media?
8 Does your family get upset with you
whenever you use social media when you
are together?
9 Do you share social media accounts with
your family members?
10 How often do you share thoughts,
feelings, or opinions on social media that
you can’t share with your family?
Item PEER RELATIONSHIP
5 4 3 2 1
No. Item Statement
1 How often do you talk with your peers of
social media?
peers through social media?
3 How often do you use social media while
you are with your peers?
93
4 How often do you compare yourself with

your peers through social media?
5 How often do you talk negatively about
6 How often do you talk positively about
7 How often does social media destroy your
relationships with your peers?
8 How often social media does improve/fix
your relationships with your peers?
9 How often do you get into fights because
of social media?
10 How often do you get into fights on social
media?
Item ACADEMIC
5 4 3 2 1
No. Item Statement
1 How often do you study?
2 How often do you neglect your studies in

favor of spending time on social media?
3 How often do you find yourself favoring
spending time on social media sites
rather than studying?
4 How often do you find yourself getting
distracted by social media while
studying? (e.g. receiving messages,
updates, snaps, etc.)
5 How often do you use social media while
studying?
6 Does social media help you excel in your
studies?
7 Does social media make you fail in your
studies?
8 How often do you find yourself posting or
updating your accounts instead of
studying?
9 How often do you find your social life on
social media more important than your
academic career?
10 Do you feel as though your social life is
more important than your academics?
Item SOCIAL NETWORKING
5 4 3 2 1
No. Item Statement
1 How often do you use Facebook?
2 How often do you use Twitter?
3 How often do you use Instagram?
94
4 How often do you use Snapchat?

5 How often do you use Tumblr?
6 How often do you use Google?
7 How often do you use Yahoo?
8 How often do you use You tube?
For this part, put a check on the box if you have an account on the following social
media networks:
□ Facebook
□ Twitter
□ Instagram
□ Snapchat
□ Tumblr
□ Google
□ Yahoo
□ Youtube
95
APPENDIX E- Social Media Score of the Generation Z of the College of

the Holy Spirit of Tarlac
Family Peer Social

Respondents Academics
Relationship Relationship Networking
1 45 43 41 35
2 44 41 41 35
3 44 39 40 33
4 43 38 39 33
5 42 38 38 33
6 42 37 38 32
7 40 37 38 32
8 39 36 38 32
9 39 36 38 32
10 39 35 37 31
11 38 35 37 30
12 38 34 37 30
13 38 34 36 30
14 38 34 36 30
15 38 34 36 30
16 38 34 36 30
17 38 34 36 30
18 38 33 35 30
19 38 33 34 29
20 38 33 34 29
21 37 33 34 29
22 36 33 34 29
23 36 32 34 29
24 36 32 34 29
25 36 32 34 29
96
26 36 32 34 29
27 35 32 34 28
28 35 32 34 28
29 35 32 33 28
30 35 31 33 28
31 35 31 33 28
32 35 31 33 28
33 35 31 33 28
34 35 31 33 28
35 35 30 32 28
36 35 30 32 28
37 35 30 32 28
38 34 30 32 28
39 34 30 32 28
40 34 30 32 28
41 34 30 32 27
42 34 29 32 27
43 34 29 32 27
44 34 29 31 27
45 34 29 31 27
46 34 29 31 27
47 34 29 31 27
48 34 29 31 27
49 33 29 31 26
50 33 29 30 26
51 33 29 30 26
52 33 29 30 26
53 32 29 30 26
54 32 29 30 26
55 32 28 30 26
97
56 32 28 30 25
57 31 28 30 25
58 31 28 29 25
59 31 28 29 25
60 31 28 29 25
61 31 28 29 24
62 31 28 29 24
63 31 27 29 24
64 31 27 29 24
65 31 27 29 24
66 30 27 28 23
67 30 27 28 23
68 30 27 28 23
69 30 27 28 23
70 30 27 27 23
71 30 27 27 23
72 30 27 27 23
73 30 26 27 23
74 29 26 27 22
75 29 26 27 22
76 28 25 27 22
77 28 25 26 22
78 28 24 25 22
79 27 24 25 22
80 27 24 25 21
81 27 24 25 21
82 27 24 24 21
83 27 24 24 21
84 26 23 24 20
85 26 22 24 20
98
86 26 22 23 19
87 26 22 23 19
88 25 22 23 18
89 25 21 22 18
90 24 21 22 17
91 22 19 21 17
92 22 17 21 16
93 22 17 20 16
94 19 14 18 15
99
APPENDIX F - Personality Preferences Score of the Generation Z of

the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of Achievement and
Deference
Achievement Deference
Respondents
Score Interpretation Score Interpretation
1 97 Average 98 Average
100
101
102
103
APPENDIX G- Personality Preferences Score of the Generation Z of

the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of Order and
Exhibition
Order Exhibition
Respondents
1 99 Average Average
97
97
96
96
92
92
89
88
88
82
82
82
82
81
81
73
73
73
73
73
72
72
63
63
104
63
63
62
62
62
52
52
52
52
52
52
52
49
49
42
42
42
42
37
37
37
37
37
30
30
30
30
30
28
28
105
28
28
21
21
21
21
21
21
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
6
6
6
6
6
106
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
107
APPENDIX H - Personality Preferences Score of the Generation Z of

the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of Autonomy and
Affiliation
Autonomy Affiliation
Respondents
1 Average Average
97 96
2 Average Average
96 94
3 Average Average
96 93
4 Average Average
96 89
5 Average Average
94 84
6 Average Average
94 84
7 Average Average
92 84
8 Average Average
92 79
9 Average Average
92 79
10 Average Average
92 77
11 Average Average
92 68
12 Average Average
87 64
13 Average Average
87 64
14 Average Average
87 58
15 Average Average
82 58
16 Average Average
82 58
17 Average Average
82 58
18 Average Average
82 58
19 Average Average
82 58
20 Average Average
82 54
21 Average Average
82 54
22 Average Average
82 54
23 Average Average
82 50
24 Average Average
82 50
108
25 Average Average
82 50
26 Average Average
82 50
27 Average Average
77 45
28 Average Average
77 45
29 Average Average
77 41
30 Average Average
77 41
31 Average Average
76 41
32 Average Average
76 41
33 Average Average
76 41
34 Average Average
70 41
35 Average Average
70 36
36 Average Average
70 36
37 Average Average
70 36
38 Average Average
70 36
39 Average Average
70 36
40 Average Average
70 32
41 Average Average
70 32
42 Average Average
70 32
43 Average Average
70 32
44 Average Average
62 32
45 Average Average
62 32
46 Average Average
62 32
47 Average Average
62 32
48 Average Average
62 32
49 Average Average
62 28
50 Average Average
62 24
51 Average Average
62 24
52 Average Average
62 24
53 Average Average
62 24
54 Average Average
61 24
109
55 Average Average
61 24
56 Average Average
53 24
57 Average Average
53 24
58 Average Average
53 24
59 Average Average
53 21
60 Average Average
53 17
61 Average Average
53 17
62 Average Average
53 17
63 Average Average
53 17
64 Average Average
52 17
65 Average Average
45 17
66 Average Average
45 17
67 Average Average
45 16
68 Average Average
43 16
69 Average Average
43 12
70 Average Average
36 12
71 Average Average
36 12
72 Average Average
36 12
73 Average Average
36 12
74 Average Average
34 12
75 Average Average
34 11
76 Average Average
34 7
77 Average Average
34 7
78 Average Average
34 7
79 Average Average
28 4
80 Average Average
28 4
81 Average Average
28 4
82 Average Average
28 4
83 Average Average
28 4
84 Average Average
28 4
110
85 Average Average
22 3
86 Average Average
20 3
87 Average Average
15 3
88 Average Average
15 3
89 Average Average
13 3
90 Average Average
11 2
91 Average Average
9 2
92 Average Average
9 2
93 Average Average
6 1
94 Average Average
1 1
111
APPENDIX I - Personality Preferences Score of the Generation Z of

the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of Intraception and
Succorance
Intraception Succorance
Respondents
1 Average Average
97 98
2 Average Average
90 98
3 Average Average
90 98
4 Average Average
90 96
5 Average Average
90 95
6 Average Average
85 95
7 Average Average
85 95
8 Average Average
85 93
9 Average Average
84 93
10 Average Average
80 93
11 Average Average
80 93
12 Average Average
80 93
13 Average Average
80 93
14 Average Average
80 93
15 Average Average
80 93
16 Average Average
78 90
17 Average Average
73 90
18 Average Average
73 90
19 Average Average
73 90
20 Average Average
73 90
21 Average Average
73 87
22 Average Average
73 87
23 Average Average
66 86
24 Average Average
66 86
112
25 Average Average
66 86
26 Average Average
66 86
27 Average Average
66 86
28 Average Average
66 83
29 Average Average
64 83
30 Average Average
58 83
31 Average Average
58 83
32 Average Average
58 83
33 Average Average
58 83
34 Average Average
58 81
35 Average Average
58 81
36 Average Average
58 81
37 Average Average
51 81
38 Average Average
51 81
39 Average Average
51 81
40 Average Average
49 81
41 Average Average
49 81
42 Average Average
49 78
43 Average Average
49 78
44 Average Average
49 78
45 Average Average
45 76
46 Average Average
45 76
47 Average Average
45 76
48 Average Average
45 76
49 Average Average
45 76
50 Average Average
45 76
51 Average Average
45 72
52 Average Average
43 67
53 Average Average
43 67
54 Average Average
43 67
113
55 Average Average
43 67
56 Average Average
43 65
57 Average Average
43 65
58 Average Average
43 65
59 Average Average
43 59
60 Average Average
43 59
61 Average Average
43 59
62 Average Average
39 59
63 Average Average
35 59
64 Average Average
35 59
65 Average Average
35 59
66 Average Average
35 59
67 Average Average
35 59
68 Average Average
35 58
69 Average Average
32 51
70 Average Average
32 51
71 Average Average
32 51
72 Average Average
28 51
73 Average Average
28 44
74 Average Average
28 44
75 Average Average
28 44
76 Average Average
25 44
77 Average Average
25 44
78 Average Average
22 44
79 Average Average
22 44
80 Average Average
22 35
81 Average Average
22 33
82 Average Average
22 33
83 Average Average
17 33
84 Average Average
16 33
114
85 Average Average
16 33
86 Average Average
16 33
87 Average Average
16 27
88 Average Average
16 25
89 Average Average
13 25
90 Average Average
12 18
91 Average Average
9 18
92 Average Average
9 13
93 Average Average
5 13
94 Average Average
4 6
115
APPENDIX J - Personality Preferences Score of the Generation Z of

the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of Dominance and
Abasement
Dominance Abasement
Respondents
1 Average Average
99 99
2 Average Average
95 98
3 Average Average
95 96
4 Average Average
92 96
5 Average Average
92 96
6 Average Average
87 94
7 Average Average
87 94
8 Average Average
83 94
9 Average Average
83 93
10 Average Average
83 93
11 Average Average
74 93
12 Average Average
74 92
13 Average Average
74 90
14 Average Average
74 90
15 Average Average
67 90
16 Average Average
67 90
17 Average Average
67 90
18 Average Average
67 90
19 Average Average
67 88
20 Average Average
67 88
21 Average Average
67 86
22 Average Average
63 86
23 Average Average
63 86
24 Average Average
59 86
116
25 Average Average
59 84
26 Average Average
59 84
27 Average Average
59 84
28 Average Average
59 81
29 Average Average
59 81
30 Average Average
51 81
31 Average Average
51 81
32 Average Average
51 81
33 Average Average
51 81
34 Average Average
51 81
35 Average Average
42 81
36 Average Average
42 81
37 Average Average
42 79
38 Average Average
42 79
39 Average Average
38 75
40 Average Average
38 74
41 Average Average
38 74
42 Average Average
36 74
43 Average Average
36 74
44 Average Average
36 74
45 Average Average
36 74
46 Average Average
36 74
47 Average Average
36 67
48 Average Average
36 67
49 Average Average
36 67
50 Average Average
36 66
51 Average Average
32 66
52 Average Average
28 66
53 Average Average
28 66
54 Average Average
28 66
117
55 Average Average
28 66
56 Average Average
27 61
57 Average Average
27 61
58 Average Average
27 58
59 Average Average
27 58
60 Average Average
23 58
61 Average Average
23 58
62 Average Average
23 58
63 Average Average
23 58
64 Average Average
21 53
65 Average Average
21 51
66 Average Average
21 51
67 Average Average
21 51
68 Average Average
17 51
69 Average Average
17 51
70 Average Average
17 45
71 Average Average
17 45
72 Average Average
13 45
73 Average Average
13 45
74 Average Average
11 45
75 Average Average
11 45
76 Average Average
11 45
77 Average Average
11 45
78 Average Average
11 38
79 Average Average
9 37
80 Average Average
9 37
81 Average Average
9 37
82 Average Average
9 37
83 Average Average
9 37
84 Average Average
9 37
118
85 Average Average
9 37
86 Average Average
9 31
87 Average Average
8 31
88 Average Average
8 31
89 Average Average
5 25
90 Average Average
5 25
91 Average Average
5 25
92 Average Average
5 19
93 Average Average
4 19
94 Average Average
3 14
119
APPENDIX K - Personality Preferences Score of the Generation Z of

the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of Nurturance and
Change
Nurturance Change
Respondents
1 Average Average
97 99
2 Average Average
95 99
3 Average Average
94 99
4 Average Average
91 99
5 Average Average
91 98
6 Average Average
91 96
7 Average Average
91 96
8 Average Average
91 96
9 Average Average
90 94
10 Average Average
87 94
11 Average Average
87 94
12 Average Average
87 94
13 Average Average
87 94
14 Average Average
87 93
15 Average Average
86 90
16 Average Average
82 90
17 Average Average
82 89
18 Average Average
82 89
19 Average Average
82 85
20 Average Average
82 85
21 Average Average
74 81
22 Average Average
74 81
23 Average Average
74 81
24 Average Average
74 81
120
25 Average Average
74 81
26 Average Average
74 78
27 Average Average
70 73
28 Average Average
70 73
29 Average Average
70 73
30 Average Average
70 73
31 Average Average
70 73
32 Average Average
66 73
33 Average Average
66 73
34 Average Average
66 73
35 Average Average
66 73
36 Average Average
66 71
37 Average Average
66 71
38 Average Average
66 71
39 Average Average
66 71
40 Average Average
66 71
41 Average Average
66 71
42 Average Average
66 68
43 Average Average
63 68
44 Average Average
63 68
45 Average Average
63 68
46 Average Average
58 68
47 Average Average
58 59
48 Average Average
58 59
49 Average Average
58 59
50 Average Average
58 59
51 Average Average
55 57
52 Average Average
55 57
53 Average Average
55 57
54 Average Average
50 57
121
55 Average Average
50 57
56 Average Average
50 52
57 Average Average
46 52
58 Average Average
41 52
59 Average Average
41 52
60 Average Average
41 52
61 Average Average
41 52
62 Average Average
41 50
63 Average Average
41 42
64 Average Average
41 42
65 Average Average
41 42
66 Average Average
37 42
67 Average Average
37 42
68 Average Average
32 42
69 Average Average
32 35
70 Average Average
32 35
71 Average Average
31 35
72 Average Average
31 35
73 Average Average
26 35
74 Average Average
26 35
75 Average Average
26 35
76 Average Average
26 28
77 Average Average
26 28
78 Average Average
26 28
79 Average Average
24 28
80 Average Average
24 21
81 Average Average
20 21
82 Average Average
20 21
83 Average Average
20 20
84 Average Average
20 17
122
85 Average Average
18 17
86 Average Average
14 17
87 Average Average
14 17
88 Average Average
14 13
89 Average Average
9 13
90 Average Average
9 10
91 Average Average
6 7
92 Average Average
3 7
93 Average Average
2 7
94 Average Average
2 7
123
APPENDIX L - Personality Preferences Score of the Generation Z of

the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of Endurance and
Heterosexuality
Endurance Heterosexuality
Respondents
1 Average 99 Average
99
99
98
95
95
95
90
90
90
85
85
85
85
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
79
76
76
76
124
76
76
76
75
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
64
64
64
64
64
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
125
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
50
50
50
50
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
36
36
36
30
126
30
30
29
24
24
18
18
13
9
5
127
APPENDIX M - Personality Preferences Score of the Generation Z of

the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of Aggression
Aggression
Respondents
Score Interpretations
1 99 Average
2 99 Average
3 98 Average
4 98 Average
5 98 Average
6 95 Average
7 95 Average
8 95 Average
9 92 Average
10 92 Average
11 92 Average
12 92 Average
13 92 Average
14 92 Average
15 89 Average
16 89 Average
17 89 Average
18 89 Average
19 89 Average
20 89 Average
21 89 Average
22 89 Average
23 89 Average
24 88 Average
25 84 Average
26 84 Average
27 84 Average
28 84 Average
29 84 Average
30 79 Average
31 79 Average
32 79 Average
33 79 Average
34 79 Average
35 79 Average
36 79 Average
37 79 Average
38 79 Average
39 77 Average
40 74 Average
128
41 74 Average
42 66 Average
43 66 Average
44 66 Average
45 66 Average
46 66 Average
47 66 Average
48 66 Average
49 65 Average
50 65 Average
51 65 Average
52 65 Average
53 65 Average
54 60 Average
55 60 Average
56 60 Average
57 60 Average
58 60 Average
59 60 Average
60 60 Average
61 60 Average
62 60 Average
63 57 Average
64 57 Average
65 57 Average
66 57 Average
67 51 Average
68 51 Average
69 51 Average
70 51 Average
71 47 Average
72 44 Average
73 44 Average
74 44 Average
75 44 Average
76 44 Average
77 40 Average
78 40 Average
79 40 Average
80 40 Average
81 36 Average
82 36 Average
83 32 Average
84 32 Average
85 32 Average
129
86 32 Average
87 27 Average
88 27 Average
89 27 Average
90 21 Average
91 21 Average
92 17 Average
93 2 Average
94 1 Average
130
APPENDIX N - Correlation Between Family Relationship and

Achievement Personality Preferences of the Generation Z of the
X Y X2 Y2 XY
Respondents
Achievement
Family
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 95 97 9025 9409 9215
2 94 93 8836 8649 8742
3 94 93 8836 8649 8742
4 93 93 8649 8649 8649
5 92 93 8464 8649 8556
6 92 91 8464 8281 8372
7 90 90 8100 8100 8100
8 89 90 7921 8100 8010
9 89 90 7921 8100 8010
10 89 84 7921 7056 7476
11 88 84 7744 7056 7392
12 88 84 7744 7056 7392
13 88 84 7744 7056 7392
14 88 83 7744 6889 7304
15 88 79 7744 6241 6952
16 88 79 7744 6241 6952
17 88 79 7744 6241 6952
18 88 79 7744 6241 6952
19 88 79 7744 6241 6952
20 88 72 7744 5184 6336
21 87 72 7569 5184 6264
22 86 72 7396 5184 6192
23 86 72 7396 5184 6192
24 86 72 7396 5184 6192
25 86 72 7396 5184 6192
26 86 72 7396 5184 6192
27 85 66 7225 4356 5610
28 85 66 7225 4356 5610
29 85 64 7225 4096 5440
30 85 64 7225 4096 5440
31 85 64 7225 4096 5440
32 85 64 7225 4096 5440
33 85 64 7225 4096 5440
34 85 64 7225 4096 5440
35 85 64 7225 4096 5440
36 85 64 7225 4096 5440
37 85 64 7225 4096 5440
38 84 58 7056 3364 4872
39 84 58 7056 3364 4872
40 84 58 7056 3364 4872
131
41 84 58 7056 3364 4872

42 84 58 7056 3364 4872
43 84 58 7056 3364 4872
44 84 58 7056 3364 4872
45 84 58 7056 3364 4872
46 84 58 7056 3364 4872
47 84 50 7056 2500 4200
48 84 50 7056 2500 4200
49 83 50 6889 2500 4150
50 83 47 6889 2209 3901
51 83 47 6889 2209 3901
52 83 47 6889 2209 3901
53 82 47 6724 2209 3854
54 82 47 6724 2209 3854
55 82 47 6724 2209 3854
56 82 47 6724 2209 3854
57 81 47 6561 2209 3807
58 81 40 6561 1600 3240
59 81 40 6561 1600 3240
60 81 40 6561 1600 3240
61 81 40 6561 1600 3240
62 81 40 6561 1600 3240
63 81 36 6561 1296 2916
64 81 36 6561 1296 2916
65 81 36 6561 1296 2916
66 80 36 6400 1296 2880
67 80 36 6400 1296 2880
68 80 36 6400 1296 2880
69 80 36 6400 1296 2880
70 80 30 6400 900 2400
71 80 30 6400 900 2400
72 80 30 6400 900 2400
73 80 30 6400 900 2400
74 79 27 6241 729 2133
75 79 27 6241 729 2133
76 78 27 6084 729 2106
77 78 27 6084 729 2106
78 78 27 6084 729 2106
79 77 27 5929 729 2079
80 77 27 5929 729 2079
81 77 19 5929 361 1463
82 77 19 5929 361 1463
83 77 17 5929 289 1309
84 76 16 5776 256 1216
85 76 13 5776 169 988
86 76 13 5776 169 988
87 76 13 5776 169 988
88 75 13 5625 169 975
89 75 13 5625 169 975
90 74 7 5476 49 518
91 72 7 5184 49 504
92 72 5 5184 25 360
132
93 72 2 5184 4 144
94 69 2 4761 4 138
Total 7792 4824 648440 308234 412015
Mean 82.89 51.32
t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means
Variable 1 Variable 2
Mean 82.893617 51.31914894
Variance 27.2358728 652.370167
Observations 94 94
Pearson Correlation 0.98
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 93
Computed t - value 14.96
P(T<=t) one-tail 8.5669E-27
t Critical one-tail 1.66140367
P(T<=t) two-tail 1.7134E-26
Tabular t - value 1.99
Note: If the Computed t – value is higher than the Tabular t –value, the result
is significant. But if the Computed t – value is lower than the Tabular t- value,
then it is not significant.
Findings: Significant
133
APPENDIX O - Correlation Between Peer Relationship and

X Y X2 Y2 XY
Respondents
Achievement
Peer
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 93 97 8649 9409 9021
2 91 93 8281 8649 8463
3 89 93 7921 8649 8277
4 88 93 7744 8649 8184
5 88 93 7744 8649 8184
6 87 91 7569 8281 7917
7 87 90 7569 8100 7830
8 86 90 7396 8100 7740
9 86 90 7396 8100 7740
10 85 84 7225 7056 7140
11 85 84 7225 7056 7140
12 84 84 7056 7056 7056
13 84 84 7056 7056 7056
14 84 83 7056 6889 6972
15 84 79 7056 6241 6636
16 84 79 7056 6241 6636
17 84 79 7056 6241 6636
18 83 79 6889 6241 6557
19 83 79 6889 6241 6557
20 83 72 6889 5184 5976
21 83 72 6889 5184 5976
22 83 72 6889 5184 5976
23 82 72 6724 5184 5904
24 82 72 6724 5184 5904
25 82 72 6724 5184 5904
26 82 72 6724 5184 5904
27 82 66 6724 4356 5412
28 82 66 6724 4356 5412
29 82 64 6724 4096 5248
30 81 64 6561 4096 5184
31 81 64 6561 4096 5184
32 81 64 6561 4096 5184
33 81 64 6561 4096 5184
34 81 64 6561 4096 5184
35 80 64 6400 4096 5120
36 80 64 6400 4096 5120
37 80 64 6400 4096 5120
38 80 58 6400 3364 4640
39 80 58 6400 3364 4640
134
40 80 58 6400 3364 4640

41 80 58 6400 3364 4640
42 79 58 6241 3364 4582
43 79 58 6241 3364 4582
44 79 58 6241 3364 4582
45 79 58 6241 3364 4582
46 79 58 6241 3364 4582
47 79 50 6241 2500 3950
48 79 50 6241 2500 3950
49 79 50 6241 2500 3950
50 79 47 6241 2209 3713
51 79 47 6241 2209 3713
52 79 47 6241 2209 3713
53 79 47 6241 2209 3713
54 79 47 6241 2209 3713
55 78 47 6084 2209 3666
56 78 47 6084 2209 3666
57 78 47 6084 2209 3666
58 78 40 6084 1600 3120
59 78 40 6084 1600 3120
60 78 40 6084 1600 3120
61 78 40 6084 1600 3120
62 78 40 6084 1600 3120
63 77 36 5929 1296 2772
64 77 36 5929 1296 2772
65 77 36 5929 1296 2772
66 77 36 5929 1296 2772
67 77 36 5929 1296 2772
68 77 36 5929 1296 2772
69 77 36 5929 1296 2772
70 77 30 5929 900 2310
71 77 30 5929 900 2310
72 77 30 5929 900 2310
73 76 30 5776 900 2280
74 76 27 5776 729 2052
75 76 27 5776 729 2052
76 75 27 5625 729 2025
77 75 27 5625 729 2025
78 74 27 5476 729 1998
79 74 27 5476 729 1998
80 74 27 5476 729 1998
81 74 19 5476 361 1406
82 74 19 5476 361 1406
83 74 17 5476 289 1258
84 73 16 5329 256 1168
85 72 13 5184 169 936
86 72 13 5184 169 936
87 72 13 5184 169 936
88 72 13 5184 169 936
89 71 13 5041 169 923
90 71 7 5041 49 497
91 69 7 4761 49 483
135
92 67 5 4489 25 335
93 67 2 4489 4 134
94 64 2 4096 4 128
Total 7436 4824 590684 308234 393365
Mean 79.11 51.32
Mean 79.1064 51.31914894
Variance 26.3326 652.370167
Observations 94 94
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 93
136
APPENDIX P - Correlation Between Academics and Achievement

X Y X2 Y2 XY
Respondents
Achievement
Academics Personality
Preference
1 91 97 8281 9409 8827
2 91 93 8281 8649 8463
3 90 93 8100 8649 8370
4 89 93 7921 8649 8277
5 88 93 7744 8649 8184
6 88 91 7744 8281 8008
7 88 90 7744 8100 7920
8 88 90 7744 8100 7920
9 88 90 7744 8100 7920
10 87 84 7569 7056 7308
11 87 84 7569 7056 7308
12 87 84 7569 7056 7308
13 86 84 7396 7056 7224
14 86 83 7396 6889 7138
15 86 79 7396 6241 6794
16 86 79 7396 6241 6794
17 86 79 7396 6241 6794
18 85 79 7225 6241 6715
19 84 79 7056 6241 6636
20 84 72 7056 5184 6048
21 84 72 7056 5184 6048
22 84 72 7056 5184 6048
23 84 72 7056 5184 6048
24 84 72 7056 5184 6048
25 84 72 7056 5184 6048
26 84 72 7056 5184 6048
27 84 66 7056 4356 5544
28 84 66 7056 4356 5544
29 83 64 6889 4096 5312
30 83 64 6889 4096 5312
31 83 64 6889 4096 5312
32 83 64 6889 4096 5312
33 83 64 6889 4096 5312
34 83 64 6889 4096 5312
35 82 64 6724 4096 5248
36 82 64 6724 4096 5248
37 82 64 6724 4096 5248
38 82 58 6724 3364 4756
39 82 58 6724 3364 4756
137
40 82 58 6724 3364 4756

41 82 58 6724 3364 4756
42 82 58 6724 3364 4756
43 82 58 6724 3364 4756
44 81 58 6561 3364 4698
45 81 58 6561 3364 4698
46 81 58 6561 3364 4698
47 81 50 6561 2500 4050
48 81 50 6561 2500 4050
49 81 50 6561 2500 4050
50 80 47 6400 2209 3760
51 80 47 6400 2209 3760
52 80 47 6400 2209 3760
53 80 47 6400 2209 3760
54 80 47 6400 2209 3760
55 80 47 6400 2209 3760
56 80 47 6400 2209 3760
57 80 47 6400 2209 3760
58 79 40 6241 1600 3160
59 79 40 6241 1600 3160
60 79 40 6241 1600 3160
61 79 40 6241 1600 3160
62 79 40 6241 1600 3160
63 79 36 6241 1296 2844
64 79 36 6241 1296 2844
65 79 36 6241 1296 2844
66 78 36 6084 1296 2808
67 78 36 6084 1296 2808
68 78 36 6084 1296 2808
69 78 36 6084 1296 2808
70 77 30 5929 900 2310
71 77 30 5929 900 2310
72 77 30 5929 900 2310
73 77 30 5929 900 2310
74 77 27 5929 729 2079
75 77 27 5929 729 2079
76 77 27 5929 729 2079
77 76 27 5776 729 2052
78 75 27 5625 729 2025
79 75 27 5625 729 2025
80 75 27 5625 729 2025
81 75 19 5625 361 1425
82 74 19 5476 361 1406
83 74 17 5476 289 1258
84 74 16 5476 256 1184
85 74 13 5476 169 962
86 73 13 5329 169 949
87 73 13 5329 169 949
88 73 13 5329 169 949
89 72 13 5184 169 936
90 72 7 5184 49 504
91 71 7 5041 49 497
138
92 71 5 5041 25 355
93 70 2 4900 4 140
94 68 2 4624 4 136
Total 7577 4824 613099 308234 400626
Mean 80.61 51.32
Mean 80.6064 51.31914894
Variance 25.209 652.370167
Observations 94 94
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 93
139
APPENDIX Q - Correlation Between Social Networking and

X Y X2 Y2 XY
Respondents
Achievement
Social
Personality
Networking
Preference
1 85 97 7225 9409 8245
2 85 93 7225 8649 7905
3 83 93 6889 8649 7719
4 83 93 6889 8649 7719
5 83 93 6889 8649 7719
6 82 91 6724 8281 7462
7 82 90 6724 8100 7380
8 82 90 6724 8100 7380
9 82 90 6724 8100 7380
10 81 84 6561 7056 6804
11 80 84 6400 7056 6720
12 80 84 6400 7056 6720
13 80 84 6400 7056 6720
14 80 83 6400 6889 6640
15 80 79 6400 6241 6320
16 80 79 6400 6241 6320
17 80 79 6400 6241 6320
18 80 79 6400 6241 6320
19 79 79 6241 6241 6241
20 79 72 6241 5184 5688
21 79 72 6241 5184 5688
22 79 72 6241 5184 5688
23 79 72 6241 5184 5688
24 79 72 6241 5184 5688
25 79 72 6241 5184 5688
26 79 72 6241 5184 5688
27 78 66 6084 4356 5148
28 78 66 6084 4356 5148
29 78 64 6084 4096 4992
30 78 64 6084 4096 4992
31 78 64 6084 4096 4992
32 78 64 6084 4096 4992
33 78 64 6084 4096 4992
34 78 64 6084 4096 4992
35 78 64 6084 4096 4992
36 78 64 6084 4096 4992
37 78 64 6084 4096 4992
38 78 58 6084 3364 4524
39 78 58 6084 3364 4524
40 78 58 6084 3364 4524
140
41 77 58 5929 3364 4466

42 77 58 5929 3364 4466
43 77 58 5929 3364 4466
44 77 58 5929 3364 4466
45 77 58 5929 3364 4466
46 77 58 5929 3364 4466
47 77 50 5929 2500 3850
48 77 50 5929 2500 3850
49 76 50 5776 2500 3800
50 76 47 5776 2209 3572
51 76 47 5776 2209 3572
52 76 47 5776 2209 3572
53 76 47 5776 2209 3572
54 76 47 5776 2209 3572
55 76 47 5776 2209 3572
56 75 47 5625 2209 3525
57 75 47 5625 2209 3525
58 75 40 5625 1600 3000
59 75 40 5625 1600 3000
60 75 40 5625 1600 3000
61 74 40 5476 1600 2960
62 74 40 5476 1600 2960
63 74 36 5476 1296 2664
64 74 36 5476 1296 2664
65 74 36 5476 1296 2664
66 73 36 5329 1296 2628
67 73 36 5329 1296 2628
68 73 36 5329 1296 2628
69 73 36 5329 1296 2628
70 73 30 5329 900 2190
71 73 30 5329 900 2190
72 73 30 5329 900 2190
73 73 30 5329 900 2190
74 72 27 5184 729 1944
75 72 27 5184 729 1944
76 72 27 5184 729 1944
77 72 27 5184 729 1944
78 72 27 5184 729 1944
79 72 27 5184 729 1944
80 71 27 5041 729 1917
81 71 19 5041 361 1349
82 71 19 5041 361 1349
83 71 17 5041 289 1207
84 70 16 4900 256 1120
85 70 13 4900 169 910
86 69 13 4761 169 897
87 69 13 4761 169 897
88 68 13 4624 169 884
89 68 13 4624 169 884
90 67 7 4489 49 469
91 67 7 4489 49 469
92 66 5 4356 25 330
141
93 66 2 4356 4 132
94 65 2 4225 4 130
Total 7130 4824 542632 308234 376216
Mean 75.85 51.32
Mean 75.8511 51.31914894
Variance 19.5045 652.370167
Observations 94 94
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 93
142
APPENDIX R - Correlation Between Family Relationship and

Deference Personality Preferences of the Generation Z of the College
Respondents X Y X2 Y2 XY
Deference
Family
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 95 98 9025 9604 9310

2 94 95 8836 9025 8930
3 94 95 8836 9025 8930
4 93 95 8649 9025 8835
5 92 93 8464 8649 8556
6 92 91 8464 8281 8372
7 90 91 8100 8281 8190
8 89 91 7921 8281 8099
9 89 91 7921 8281 8099
10 89 91 7921 8281 8099
11 88 88 7744 7744 7744
12 88 85 7744 7225 7480
13 88 85 7744 7225 7480
14 88 81 7744 6561 7128
15 88 81 7744 6561 7128
16 88 81 7744 6561 7128
17 88 80 7744 6400 7040
18 88 80 7744 6400 7040
19 88 80 7744 6400 7040
20 88 80 7744 6400 7040
21 87 73 7569 5329 6351
22 86 73 7396 5329 6278
23 86 73 7396 5329 6278
24 86 73 7396 5329 6278
25 86 73 7396 5329 6278
26 86 73 7396 5329 6278
27 85 73 7225 5329 6205
28 85 73 7225 5329 6205
29 85 73 7225 5329 6205
30 85 73 7225 5329 6205
31 85 73 7225 5329 6205
32 85 73 7225 5329 6205
33 85 73 7225 5329 6205
34 85 73 7225 5329 6205
35 85 73 7225 5329 6205
36 85 73 7225 5329 6205
37 85 63 7225 3969 5355
38 84 63 7056 3969 5292
143
39 84 63 7056 3969 5292

40 84 63 7056 3969 5292
41 84 63 7056 3969 5292
42 84 63 7056 3969 5292
43 84 62 7056 3844 5208
44 84 62 7056 3844 5208
45 84 62 7056 3844 5208
46 84 62 7056 3844 5208
47 84 62 7056 3844 5208
48 84 62 7056 3844 5208
49 83 62 6889 3844 5146
50 83 62 6889 3844 5146
51 83 62 6889 3844 5146
52 83 62 6889 3844 5146
53 82 52 6724 2704 4264
54 82 50 6724 2500 4100
55 82 50 6724 2500 4100
56 82 50 6724 2500 4100
57 81 50 6561 2500 4050
58 81 50 6561 2500 4050
59 81 50 6561 2500 4050
60 81 50 6561 2500 4050
61 81 50 6561 2500 4050
62 81 50 6561 2500 4050
63 81 43 6561 1849 3483
64 81 43 6561 1849 3483
65 81 43 6561 1849 3483
66 80 41 6400 1681 3280
67 80 41 6400 1681 3280
68 80 41 6400 1681 3280
69 80 41 6400 1681 3280
70 80 41 6400 1681 3280
71 80 41 6400 1681 3280
72 80 34 6400 1156 2720
73 80 29 6400 841 2320
74 79 29 6241 841 2291
75 79 29 6241 841 2291
76 78 29 6084 841 2262
77 78 29 6084 841 2262
78 78 29 6084 841 2262
79 77 23 5929 529 1771
80 77 21 5929 441 1617
81 77 21 5929 441 1617
82 77 21 5929 441 1617
83 77 21 5929 441 1617
84 76 21 5776 441 1596
85 76 16 5776 256 1216
86 76 14 5776 196 1064
87 76 14 5776 196 1064
88 75 14 5625 196 1050
89 75 14 5625 196 1050
90 74 10 5476 100 740
144
91 72 9 5184 81 648
92 72 9 5184 81 648
93 72 6 5184 36 432
94 69 6 4761 36 414
Total 7792 5243 648440 352875 446668
Mean 82.89 55.78
Mean 82.893617 55.77659574
Variance 27.2358728 649.8742851
Observations 94 94
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
df 93
145
APPENDIX S - Correlation Between Peer Relationship and Deference

Deference
Peer
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 93 98 8649 9604 9114

2 91 95 8281 9025 8645
3 89 95 7921 9025 8455
4 88 95 7744 9025 8360
5 88 93 7744 8649 8184
6 87 91 7569 8281 7917
7 87 91 7569 8281 7917
8 86 91 7396 8281 7826
9 86 91 7396 8281 7826
10 85 91 7225 8281 7735
11 85 88 7225 7744 7480
12 84 85 7056 7225 7140
13 84 85 7056 7225 7140
14 84 81 7056 6561 6804
15 84 81 7056 6561 6804
16 84 81 7056 6561 6804
17 84 80 7056 6400 6720
18 83 80 6889 6400 6640
19 83 80 6889 6400 6640
20 83 80 6889 6400 6640
21 83 73 6889 5329 6059
22 83 73 6889 5329 6059
23 82 73 6724 5329 5986
24 82 73 6724 5329 5986
25 82 73 6724 5329 5986
26 82 73 6724 5329 5986
27 82 73 6724 5329 5986
28 82 73 6724 5329 5986
29 82 73 6724 5329 5986
30 81 73 6561 5329 5913
31 81 73 6561 5329 5913
32 81 73 6561 5329 5913
33 81 73 6561 5329 5913
34 81 73 6561 5329 5913
35 80 73 6400 5329 5840
36 80 73 6400 5329 5840
37 80 63 6400 3969 5040
38 80 63 6400 3969 5040
146
39 80 63 6400 3969 5040

40 80 63 6400 3969 5040
41 80 63 6400 3969 5040
42 79 63 6241 3969 4977
43 79 62 6241 3844 4898
44 79 62 6241 3844 4898
45 79 62 6241 3844 4898
46 79 62 6241 3844 4898
47 79 62 6241 3844 4898
48 79 62 6241 3844 4898
49 79 62 6241 3844 4898
50 79 62 6241 3844 4898
51 79 62 6241 3844 4898
52 79 62 6241 3844 4898
53 79 52 6241 2704 4108
54 79 50 6241 2500 3950
55 78 50 6084 2500 3900
56 78 50 6084 2500 3900
57 78 50 6084 2500 3900
58 78 50 6084 2500 3900
59 78 50 6084 2500 3900
60 78 50 6084 2500 3900
61 78 50 6084 2500 3900
62 78 50 6084 2500 3900
63 77 43 5929 1849 3311
64 77 43 5929 1849 3311
65 77 43 5929 1849 3311
66 77 41 5929 1681 3157
67 77 41 5929 1681 3157
68 77 41 5929 1681 3157
69 77 41 5929 1681 3157
70 77 41 5929 1681 3157
71 77 41 5929 1681 3157
72 77 34 5929 1156 2618
73 76 29 5776 841 2204
74 76 29 5776 841 2204
75 76 29 5776 841 2204
76 75 29 5625 841 2175
77 75 29 5625 841 2175
78 74 29 5476 841 2146
79 74 23 5476 529 1702
80 74 21 5476 441 1554
81 74 21 5476 441 1554
82 74 21 5476 441 1554
83 74 21 5476 441 1554
84 73 21 5329 441 1533
85 72 16 5184 256 1152
86 72 14 5184 196 1008
87 72 14 5184 196 1008
88 72 14 5184 196 1008
89 71 14 5041 196 994
90 71 10 5041 100 710
147
91 69 9 4761 81 621
92 67 9 4489 81 603
93 67 6 4489 36 402
94 64 6 4096 36 384
Total 7436 5243 590684 352875 426413
Mean 79.11 55.78
Mean 79.106383 55.77659574
Variance 26.332647 649.8742851
Observations 94 94
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 93
148
APPENDIX T - Correlation Between Academics and Deference

Deference
Preference
1 91 98 8281 9604 8918

2 91 95 8281 9025 8645
3 90 95 8100 9025 8550
4 89 95 7921 9025 8455
5 88 93 7744 8649 8184
6 88 91 7744 8281 8008
7 88 91 7744 8281 8008
8 88 91 7744 8281 8008
9 88 91 7744 8281 8008
10 87 91 7569 8281 7917
11 87 88 7569 7744 7656
12 87 85 7569 7225 7395
13 86 85 7396 7225 7310
14 86 81 7396 6561 6966
15 86 81 7396 6561 6966
16 86 81 7396 6561 6966
17 86 80 7396 6400 6880
18 85 80 7225 6400 6800
19 84 80 7056 6400 6720
20 84 80 7056 6400 6720
21 84 73 7056 5329 6132
22 84 73 7056 5329 6132
23 84 73 7056 5329 6132
24 84 73 7056 5329 6132
25 84 73 7056 5329 6132
26 84 73 7056 5329 6132
27 84 73 7056 5329 6132
28 84 73 7056 5329 6132
29 83 73 6889 5329 6059
30 83 73 6889 5329 6059
31 83 73 6889 5329 6059
32 83 73 6889 5329 6059
33 83 73 6889 5329 6059
34 83 73 6889 5329 6059
35 82 73 6724 5329 5986
36 82 73 6724 5329 5986
37 82 63 6724 3969 5166
38 82 63 6724 3969 5166
149
39 82 63 6724 3969 5166

40 82 63 6724 3969 5166
41 82 63 6724 3969 5166
42 82 63 6724 3969 5166
43 82 62 6724 3844 5084
44 81 62 6561 3844 5022
45 81 62 6561 3844 5022
46 81 62 6561 3844 5022
47 81 62 6561 3844 5022
48 81 62 6561 3844 5022
49 81 62 6561 3844 5022
50 80 62 6400 3844 4960
51 80 62 6400 3844 4960
52 80 62 6400 3844 4960
53 80 52 6400 2704 4160
54 80 50 6400 2500 4000
55 80 50 6400 2500 4000
56 80 50 6400 2500 4000
57 80 50 6400 2500 4000
58 79 50 6241 2500 3950
59 79 50 6241 2500 3950
60 79 50 6241 2500 3950
61 79 50 6241 2500 3950
62 79 50 6241 2500 3950
63 79 43 6241 1849 3397
64 79 43 6241 1849 3397
65 79 43 6241 1849 3397
66 78 41 6084 1681 3198
67 78 41 6084 1681 3198
68 78 41 6084 1681 3198
69 78 41 6084 1681 3198
70 77 41 5929 1681 3157
71 77 41 5929 1681 3157
72 77 34 5929 1156 2618
73 77 29 5929 841 2233
74 77 29 5929 841 2233
75 77 29 5929 841 2233
76 77 29 5929 841 2233
77 76 29 5776 841 2204
78 75 29 5625 841 2175
79 75 23 5625 529 1725
80 75 21 5625 441 1575
81 75 21 5625 441 1575
82 74 21 5476 441 1554
83 74 21 5476 441 1554
84 74 21 5476 441 1554
85 74 16 5476 256 1184
86 73 14 5329 196 1022
87 73 14 5329 196 1022
88 73 14 5329 196 1022
89 72 14 5184 196 1008
90 72 10 5184 100 720
150
91 71 9 5041 81 639
92 71 9 5041 81 639
93 70 6 4900 36 420
94 68 6 4624 36 408
Total 7577 5243 613099 352875 434311
Mean 80.61 55.78
Mean 80.606383 55.77659574
Variance 25.2089911 649.8742851
Observations 94 94
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 93
151
APPENDIX U - Correlation Between Social Networking and Deference

Deference
Social
Personality
Networking
Preference
1 85 98 7225 9604 8330

2 85 95 7225 9025 8075
3 83 95 6889 9025 7885
4 83 95 6889 9025 7885
5 83 93 6889 8649 7719
6 82 91 6724 8281 7462
7 82 91 6724 8281 7462
8 82 91 6724 8281 7462
9 82 91 6724 8281 7462
10 81 91 6561 8281 7371
11 80 88 6400 7744 7040
12 80 85 6400 7225 6800
13 80 85 6400 7225 6800
14 80 81 6400 6561 6480
15 80 81 6400 6561 6480
16 80 81 6400 6561 6480
17 80 80 6400 6400 6400
18 80 80 6400 6400 6400
19 79 80 6241 6400 6320
20 79 80 6241 6400 6320
21 79 73 6241 5329 5767
22 79 73 6241 5329 5767
23 79 73 6241 5329 5767
24 79 73 6241 5329 5767
25 79 73 6241 5329 5767
26 79 73 6241 5329 5767
27 78 73 6084 5329 5694
28 78 73 6084 5329 5694
29 78 73 6084 5329 5694
30 78 73 6084 5329 5694
31 78 73 6084 5329 5694
32 78 73 6084 5329 5694
33 78 73 6084 5329 5694
34 78 73 6084 5329 5694
35 78 73 6084 5329 5694
36 78 73 6084 5329 5694
37 78 63 6084 3969 4914
38 78 63 6084 3969 4914
152
39 78 63 6084 3969 4914

40 78 63 6084 3969 4914
41 77 63 5929 3969 4851
42 77 63 5929 3969 4851
43 77 62 5929 3844 4774
44 77 62 5929 3844 4774
45 77 62 5929 3844 4774
46 77 62 5929 3844 4774
47 77 62 5929 3844 4774
48 77 62 5929 3844 4774
49 76 62 5776 3844 4712
50 76 62 5776 3844 4712
51 76 62 5776 3844 4712
52 76 62 5776 3844 4712
53 76 52 5776 2704 3952
54 76 50 5776 2500 3800
55 76 50 5776 2500 3800
56 75 50 5625 2500 3750
57 75 50 5625 2500 3750
58 75 50 5625 2500 3750
59 75 50 5625 2500 3750
60 75 50 5625 2500 3750
61 74 50 5476 2500 3700
62 74 50 5476 2500 3700
63 74 43 5476 1849 3182
64 74 43 5476 1849 3182
65 74 43 5476 1849 3182
66 73 41 5329 1681 2993
67 73 41 5329 1681 2993
68 73 41 5329 1681 2993
69 73 41 5329 1681 2993
70 73 41 5329 1681 2993
71 73 41 5329 1681 2993
72 73 34 5329 1156 2482
73 73 29 5329 841 2117
74 72 29 5184 841 2088
75 72 29 5184 841 2088
76 72 29 5184 841 2088
77 72 29 5184 841 2088
78 72 29 5184 841 2088
79 72 23 5184 529 1656
80 71 21 5041 441 1491
81 71 21 5041 441 1491
82 71 21 5041 441 1491
83 71 21 5041 441 1491
84 70 21 4900 441 1470
85 70 16 4900 256 1120
86 69 14 4761 196 966
87 69 14 4761 196 966
88 68 14 4624 196 952
89 68 14 4624 196 952
90 67 10 4489 100 670
153
91 67 9 4489 81 603
92 66 9 4356 81 594
93 66 6 4356 36 396
94 65 6 4225 36 390
Total 7130 5243 542632 352875 407969
Mean 75.85 55.78
Mean 75.8510638 55.77659574
Variance 19.5044612 649.8742851
Observations 94 94
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 93
154
APPENDIX V - Correlation Between Family Relationship and Order

Respondent
s X Y X2 Y2 XY
Family Order
Relationshi Personality
p Preference
1 95 88 9025 7744 8360

2 94 88 8836 7744 8272
3 94 88 8836 7744 8272
4 93 88 8649 7744 8184
5 92 88 8464 7744 8096
6 92 86 8464 7396 7912
7 90 86 8100 7396 7740
8 89 84 7921 7056 7476
9 89 84 7921 7056 7476
10 89 84 7921 7056 7476
11 88 84 7744 7056 7392
12 88 82 7744 6724 7216
13 88 82 7744 6724 7216
14 88 82 7744 6724 7216
15 88 82 7744 6724 7216
16 88 82 7744 6724 7216
17 88 82 7744 6724 7216
18 88 82 7744 6724 7216
19 88 80 7744 6400 7040
20 88 80 7744 6400 7040
21 87 80 7569 6400 6960
22 86 80 7396 6400 6880
23 86 80 7396 6400 6880
24 86 80 7396 6400 6880
25 86 80 7396 6400 6880
26 86 80 7396 6400 6880
27 85 80 7225 6400 6800
28 85 80 7225 6400 6800
29 85 79 7225 6241 6715
30 85 79 7225 6241 6715
31 85 79 7225 6241 6715
32 85 79 7225 6241 6715
33 85 79 7225 6241 6715
155
34 85 79 7225 6241 6715

35 85 79 7225 6241 6715
36 85 79 7225 6241 6715
37 85 77 7225 5929 6545
38 84 77 7056 5929 6468
39 84 77 7056 5929 6468
40 84 77 7056 5929 6468
41 84 77 7056 5929 6468
42 84 77 7056 5929 6468
43 84 77 7056 5929 6468
44 84 77 7056 5929 6468
45 84 75 7056 5625 6300
46 84 75 7056 5625 6300
47 84 75 7056 5625 6300
48 84 75 7056 5625 6300
49 83 75 6889 5625 6225
50 83 73 6889 5329 6059
51 83 73 6889 5329 6059
52 83 73 6889 5329 6059
53 82 73 6724 5329 5986
54 82 73 6724 5329 5986
55 82 73 6724 5329 5986
56 82 73 6724 5329 5986
57 81 73 6561 5329 5913
58 81 73 6561 5329 5913
59 81 73 6561 5329 5913
60 81 73 6561 5329 5913
61 81 73 6561 5329 5913
62 81 73 6561 5329 5913
63 81 73 6561 5329 5913
64 81 71 6561 5041 5751
65 81 71 6561 5041 5751
66 80 71 6400 5041 5680
67 80 71 6400 5041 5680
68 80 71 6400 5041 5680
69 80 71 6400 5041 5680
70 80 71 6400 5041 5680
71 80 71 6400 5041 5680
72 80 70 6400 4900 5600
73 80 70 6400 4900 5600
74 79 70 6241 4900 5530
75 79 70 6241 4900 5530
76 78 70 6084 4900 5460
77 78 68 6084 4624 5304
78 78 68 6084 4624 5304
156
79 77 68 5929 4624 5236

80 77 68 5929 4624 5236
81 77 68 5929 4624 5236
82 77 68 5929 4624 5236
83 77 66 5929 4356 5082
84 76 66 5776 4356 5016
85 76 66 5776 4356 5016
86 76 66 5776 4356 5016
87 76 66 5776 4356 5016
88 75 63 5625 3969 4725
89 75 63 5625 3969 4725
90 74 63 5476 3969 4662
91 72 59 5184 3481 4248
92 72 57 5184 3249 4104
93 72 57 5184 3249 4104
94 69 55 4761 3025 3795
Total 7792 7040 648440 532158 587049
Mean 82.89 74.89
82.89361
Mean 7 74.89361702
27.23587
Variance 3 52.76275452
Observations 94 94
Df 93
Computed t – Value 34
1.661403
t Critical one-tail 7
Tabular t – Value 1.99
157
APPENDIX W - Correlation Between Peer Relationship and Order

Respondent
s X Y X2 Y2 XY
Peer Order
Relationshi Personality
p Preference
1 93 88 8649 7744 8184

2 91 88 8281 7744 8008
3 89 88 7921 7744 7832
4 88 88 7744 7744 7744
5 88 88 7744 7744 7744
6 87 86 7569 7396 7482
7 87 86 7569 7396 7482
8 86 84 7396 7056 7224
9 86 84 7396 7056 7224
10 85 84 7225 7056 7140
11 85 84 7225 7056 7140
12 84 82 7056 6724 6888
13 84 82 7056 6724 6888
14 84 82 7056 6724 6888
15 84 82 7056 6724 6888
16 84 82 7056 6724 6888
17 84 82 7056 6724 6888
18 83 82 6889 6724 6806
19 83 80 6889 6400 6640
20 83 80 6889 6400 6640
21 83 80 6889 6400 6640
22 83 80 6889 6400 6640
23 82 80 6724 6400 6560
24 82 80 6724 6400 6560
25 82 80 6724 6400 6560
26 82 80 6724 6400 6560
27 82 80 6724 6400 6560
28 82 80 6724 6400 6560
29 82 79 6724 6241 6478
30 81 79 6561 6241 6399
31 81 79 6561 6241 6399
32 81 79 6561 6241 6399
33 81 79 6561 6241 6399
158
34 81 79 6561 6241 6399

35 80 79 6400 6241 6320
36 80 79 6400 6241 6320
37 80 77 6400 5929 6160
38 80 77 6400 5929 6160
39 80 77 6400 5929 6160
40 80 77 6400 5929 6160
41 80 77 6400 5929 6160
42 79 77 6241 5929 6083
43 79 77 6241 5929 6083
44 79 77 6241 5929 6083
45 79 75 6241 5625 5925
46 79 75 6241 5625 5925
47 79 75 6241 5625 5925
48 79 75 6241 5625 5925
49 79 75 6241 5625 5925
50 79 73 6241 5329 5767
51 79 73 6241 5329 5767
52 79 73 6241 5329 5767
53 79 73 6241 5329 5767
54 79 73 6241 5329 5767
55 78 73 6084 5329 5694
56 78 73 6084 5329 5694
57 78 73 6084 5329 5694
58 78 73 6084 5329 5694
59 78 73 6084 5329 5694
60 78 73 6084 5329 5694
61 78 73 6084 5329 5694
62 78 73 6084 5329 5694
63 77 73 5929 5329 5621
64 77 71 5929 5041 5467
65 77 71 5929 5041 5467
66 77 71 5929 5041 5467
67 77 71 5929 5041 5467
68 77 71 5929 5041 5467
69 77 71 5929 5041 5467
70 77 71 5929 5041 5467
71 77 71 5929 5041 5467
72 77 70 5929 4900 5390
73 76 70 5776 4900 5320
74 76 70 5776 4900 5320
75 76 70 5776 4900 5320
76 75 70 5625 4900 5250
77 75 68 5625 4624 5100
78 74 68 5476 4624 5032
159
79 74 68 5476 4624 5032

80 74 68 5476 4624 5032
81 74 68 5476 4624 5032
82 74 68 5476 4624 5032
83 74 66 5476 4356 4884
84 73 66 5329 4356 4818
85 72 66 5184 4356 4752
86 72 66 5184 4356 4752
87 72 66 5184 4356 4752
88 72 63 5184 3969 4536
89 71 63 5041 3969 4473
90 71 63 5041 3969 4473
91 69 59 4761 3481 4071
92 67 57 4489 3249 3819
93 67 57 4489 3249 3819
94 64 55 4096 3025 3520
Total 7436 7040 590684 532158 560318
Mean 79.11 74.89
79.10638
Mean 3 74.89361702
26.33264
Variance 7 52.76275452
Observations 94 94
Df 93
Computed t – Value 16.99
1.661403
Tabular t – Value 1.99
160
APPENDIX X - Correlation Between Academics and Order Personality

Preferences of the Generation Z of the College of the Holy Spirit of
Tarlac
Respondent
s X Y X2 Y2 XY
Order
Preference
1 91 88 8281 7744 8008

2 91 88 8281 7744 8008
3 90 88 8100 7744 7920
4 89 88 7921 7744 7832
5 88 88 7744 7744 7744
6 88 86 7744 7396 7568
7 88 86 7744 7396 7568
8 88 84 7744 7056 7392
9 88 84 7744 7056 7392
10 87 84 7569 7056 7308
11 87 84 7569 7056 7308
12 87 82 7569 6724 7134
13 86 82 7396 6724 7052
14 86 82 7396 6724 7052
15 86 82 7396 6724 7052
16 86 82 7396 6724 7052
17 86 82 7396 6724 7052
18 85 82 7225 6724 6970
19 84 80 7056 6400 6720
20 84 80 7056 6400 6720
21 84 80 7056 6400 6720
22 84 80 7056 6400 6720
23 84 80 7056 6400 6720
24 84 80 7056 6400 6720
25 84 80 7056 6400 6720
26 84 80 7056 6400 6720
27 84 80 7056 6400 6720
28 84 80 7056 6400 6720
29 83 79 6889 6241 6557
30 83 79 6889 6241 6557
31 83 79 6889 6241 6557
32 83 79 6889 6241 6557
33 83 79 6889 6241 6557
161
34 83 79 6889 6241 6557

35 82 79 6724 6241 6478
36 82 79 6724 6241 6478
37 82 77 6724 5929 6314
38 82 77 6724 5929 6314
39 82 77 6724 5929 6314
40 82 77 6724 5929 6314
41 82 77 6724 5929 6314
42 82 77 6724 5929 6314
43 82 77 6724 5929 6314
44 81 77 6561 5929 6237
45 81 75 6561 5625 6075
46 81 75 6561 5625 6075
47 81 75 6561 5625 6075
48 81 75 6561 5625 6075
49 81 75 6561 5625 6075
50 80 73 6400 5329 5840
51 80 73 6400 5329 5840
52 80 73 6400 5329 5840
53 80 73 6400 5329 5840
54 80 73 6400 5329 5840
55 80 73 6400 5329 5840
56 80 73 6400 5329 5840
57 80 73 6400 5329 5840
58 79 73 6241 5329 5767
59 79 73 6241 5329 5767
60 79 73 6241 5329 5767
61 79 73 6241 5329 5767
62 79 73 6241 5329 5767
63 79 73 6241 5329 5767
64 79 71 6241 5041 5609
65 79 71 6241 5041 5609
66 78 71 6084 5041 5538
67 78 71 6084 5041 5538
68 78 71 6084 5041 5538
69 78 71 6084 5041 5538
70 77 71 5929 5041 5467
71 77 71 5929 5041 5467
72 77 70 5929 4900 5390
73 77 70 5929 4900 5390
74 77 70 5929 4900 5390
75 77 70 5929 4900 5390
76 77 70 5929 4900 5390
77 76 68 5776 4624 5168
78 75 68 5625 4624 5100
162
79 75 68 5625 4624 5100

80 75 68 5625 4624 5100
81 75 68 5625 4624 5100
82 74 68 5476 4624 5032
83 74 66 5476 4356 4884
84 74 66 5476 4356 4884
85 74 66 5476 4356 4884
86 73 66 5329 4356 4818
87 73 66 5329 4356 4818
88 73 63 5329 3969 4599
89 72 63 5184 3969 4536
90 72 63 5184 3969 4536
91 71 59 5041 3481 4189
92 71 57 5041 3249 4047
93 70 57 4900 3249 3990
94 68 55 4624 3025 3740
Total 7577 7040 613099 532158 570821
Mean 80.61 74.89
80.60638
Mean 3 74.89361702
25.20899
Variance 1 52.76275452
Observations 94 94
df 93
Computed t - Value 22.83
1.661403
Tabular t - Value 1.99
163
APPENDIX Y - Correlation Between Social Networking and Order

Order
Social
Personality
Networking
Preference
1 85 88 7225 7744 7480

2 85 88 7225 7744 7480
3 83 88 6889 7744 7304
4 83 88 6889 7744 7304
5 83 88 6889 7744 7304
6 82 86 6724 7396 7052
7 82 86 6724 7396 7052
8 82 84 6724 7056 6888
9 82 84 6724 7056 6888
10 81 84 6561 7056 6804
11 80 84 6400 7056 6720
12 80 82 6400 6724 6560
13 80 82 6400 6724 6560
14 80 82 6400 6724 6560
15 80 82 6400 6724 6560
16 80 82 6400 6724 6560
17 80 82 6400 6724 6560
18 80 82 6400 6724 6560
19 79 80 6241 6400 6320
20 79 80 6241 6400 6320
21 79 80 6241 6400 6320
22 79 80 6241 6400 6320
23 79 80 6241 6400 6320
24 79 80 6241 6400 6320
25 79 80 6241 6400 6320
26 79 80 6241 6400 6320
27 78 80 6084 6400 6240
28 78 80 6084 6400 6240
29 78 79 6084 6241 6162
30 78 79 6084 6241 6162
31 78 79 6084 6241 6162
32 78 79 6084 6241 6162
33 78 79 6084 6241 6162
164
34 78 79 6084 6241 6162

35 78 79 6084 6241 6162
36 78 79 6084 6241 6162
37 78 77 6084 5929 6006
38 78 77 6084 5929 6006
39 78 77 6084 5929 6006
40 78 77 6084 5929 6006
41 77 77 5929 5929 5929
42 77 77 5929 5929 5929
43 77 77 5929 5929 5929
44 77 77 5929 5929 5929
45 77 75 5929 5625 5775
46 77 75 5929 5625 5775
47 77 75 5929 5625 5775
48 77 75 5929 5625 5775
49 76 75 5776 5625 5700
50 76 73 5776 5329 5548
51 76 73 5776 5329 5548
52 76 73 5776 5329 5548
53 76 73 5776 5329 5548
54 76 73 5776 5329 5548
55 76 73 5776 5329 5548
56 75 73 5625 5329 5475
57 75 73 5625 5329 5475
58 75 73 5625 5329 5475
59 75 73 5625 5329 5475
60 75 73 5625 5329 5475
61 74 73 5476 5329 5402
62 74 73 5476 5329 5402
63 74 73 5476 5329 5402
64 74 71 5476 5041 5254
65 74 71 5476 5041 5254
66 73 71 5329 5041 5183
67 73 71 5329 5041 5183
68 73 71 5329 5041 5183
69 73 71 5329 5041 5183
70 73 71 5329 5041 5183
71 73 71 5329 5041 5183
72 73 70 5329 4900 5110
73 73 70 5329 4900 5110
74 72 70 5184 4900 5040
75 72 70 5184 4900 5040
76 72 70 5184 4900 5040
77 72 68 5184 4624 4896
78 72 68 5184 4624 4896
165
79 72 68 5184 4624 4896

80 71 68 5041 4624 4828
81 71 68 5041 4624 4828
82 71 68 5041 4624 4828
83 71 66 5041 4356 4686
84 70 66 4900 4356 4620
85 70 66 4900 4356 4620
86 69 66 4761 4356 4554
87 69 66 4761 4356 4554
88 68 63 4624 3969 4284
89 68 63 4624 3969 4284
90 67 63 4489 3969 4221
91 67 59 4489 3481 3953
92 66 57 4356 3249 3762
93 66 57 4356 3249 3762
94 65 55 4225 3025 3575
Total 7130 7040 542632 532158 536934
Mean 75.85 74.89
Mean 75.851064 74.89361702
Variance 19.504461 52.76275452
Observations 94 94
df 93
Computed t - Value 3.10
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.0012945
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.0025889
Tabular t - Value 1.99
166
APPENDIX Z - Correlation Between Family Relationship and

Exhibition Personality Preferences of the Generation Z of the College
Exhibition
Family
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 95 97 9025 9409 9215

2 94 97 8836 9409 9118
3 94 96 8836 9216 9024
4 93 96 8649 9216 8928
5 92 92 8464 8464 8464
6 92 92 8464 8464 8464
7 90 89 8100 7921 8010
8 89 88 7921 7744 7832
9 89 88 7921 7744 7832
10 89 82 7921 6724 7298
11 88 82 7744 6724 7216
12 88 82 7744 6724 7216
13 88 82 7744 6724 7216
14 88 81 7744 6561 7128
15 88 81 7744 6561 7128
16 88 73 7744 5329 6424
17 88 73 7744 5329 6424
18 88 73 7744 5329 6424
19 88 73 7744 5329 6424
20 88 73 7744 5329 6424
21 87 72 7569 5184 6264
22 86 72 7396 5184 6192
23 86 63 7396 3969 5418
24 86 63 7396 3969 5418
25 86 63 7396 3969 5418
26 86 63 7396 3969 5418
27 85 62 7225 3844 5270
28 85 62 7225 3844 5270
29 85 62 7225 3844 5270
30 85 52 7225 2704 4420
31 85 52 7225 2704 4420
32 85 52 7225 2704 4420
33 85 52 7225 2704 4420
34 85 52 7225 2704 4420
35 85 52 7225 2704 4420
36 85 52 7225 2704 4420
37 85 49 7225 2401 4165
38 84 49 7056 2401 4116
167
39 84 42 7056 1764 3528

40 84 42 7056 1764 3528
41 84 42 7056 1764 3528
42 84 42 7056 1764 3528
43 84 37 7056 1369 3108
44 84 37 7056 1369 3108
45 84 37 7056 1369 3108
46 84 37 7056 1369 3108
47 84 37 7056 1369 3108
48 84 30 7056 900 2520
49 83 30 6889 900 2490
50 83 30 6889 900 2490
51 83 30 6889 900 2490
52 83 30 6889 900 2490
53 82 28 6724 784 2296
54 82 28 6724 784 2296
55 82 28 6724 784 2296
56 82 28 6724 784 2296
57 81 21 6561 441 1701
58 81 21 6561 441 1701
59 81 21 6561 441 1701
60 81 21 6561 441 1701
61 81 21 6561 441 1701
62 81 21 6561 441 1701
63 81 15 6561 225 1215
64 81 15 6561 225 1215
65 81 15 6561 225 1215
66 80 15 6400 225 1200
67 80 15 6400 225 1200
68 80 15 6400 225 1200
69 80 15 6400 225 1200
70 80 15 6400 225 1200
71 80 10 6400 100 800
72 80 10 6400 100 800
73 80 10 6400 100 800
74 79 10 6241 100 790
75 79 10 6241 100 790
76 78 10 6084 100 780
77 78 10 6084 100 780
78 78 10 6084 100 780
79 77 10 5929 100 770
80 77 6 5929 36 462
81 77 6 5929 36 462
82 77 6 5929 36 462
83 77 6 5929 36 462
84 76 6 5776 36 456
85 76 6 5776 36 456
86 76 3 5776 9 228
87 76 3 5776 9 228
88 75 3 5625 9 225
89 75 3 5625 9 225
90 74 3 5476 9 222
168
91 72 3 5184 9 216
92 72 1 5184 1 72
93 72 1 5184 1 72
94 69 1 4761 1 69
Total 7792 3742 648440 232912 323942
Mean 82.89 39.81
Mean 82.893617 39.80851064
Variance 27.235873 902.672615
Observations 94 94
df 93
169
APPENDIX AA - Correlation Between Peer Relationship and

Exhibition
Peer
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 93 97 8649 9409 9021

2 91 97 8281 9409 8827
3 89 96 7921 9216 8544
4 88 96 7744 9216 8448
5 88 92 7744 8464 8096
6 87 92 7569 8464 8004
7 87 89 7569 7921 7743
8 86 88 7396 7744 7568
9 86 88 7396 7744 7568
10 85 82 7225 6724 6970
11 85 82 7225 6724 6970
12 84 82 7056 6724 6888
13 84 82 7056 6724 6888
14 84 81 7056 6561 6804
15 84 81 7056 6561 6804
16 84 73 7056 5329 6132
17 84 73 7056 5329 6132
18 83 73 6889 5329 6059
19 83 73 6889 5329 6059
20 83 73 6889 5329 6059
21 83 72 6889 5184 5976
22 83 72 6889 5184 5976
23 82 63 6724 3969 5166
24 82 63 6724 3969 5166
25 82 63 6724 3969 5166
26 82 63 6724 3969 5166
27 82 62 6724 3844 5084
28 82 62 6724 3844 5084
29 82 62 6724 3844 5084
30 81 52 6561 2704 4212
31 81 52 6561 2704 4212
32 81 52 6561 2704 4212
33 81 52 6561 2704 4212
34 81 52 6561 2704 4212
35 80 52 6400 2704 4160
36 80 52 6400 2704 4160
37 80 49 6400 2401 3920
38 80 49 6400 2401 3920
170
39 80 42 6400 1764 3360

40 80 42 6400 1764 3360
41 80 42 6400 1764 3360
42 79 42 6241 1764 3318
43 79 37 6241 1369 2923
44 79 37 6241 1369 2923
45 79 37 6241 1369 2923
46 79 37 6241 1369 2923
47 79 37 6241 1369 2923
48 79 30 6241 900 2370
49 79 30 6241 900 2370
50 79 30 6241 900 2370
51 79 30 6241 900 2370
52 79 30 6241 900 2370
53 79 28 6241 784 2212
54 79 28 6241 784 2212
55 78 28 6084 784 2184
56 78 28 6084 784 2184
57 78 21 6084 441 1638
58 78 21 6084 441 1638
59 78 21 6084 441 1638
60 78 21 6084 441 1638
61 78 21 6084 441 1638
62 78 21 6084 441 1638
63 77 15 5929 225 1155
64 77 15 5929 225 1155
65 77 15 5929 225 1155
66 77 15 5929 225 1155
67 77 15 5929 225 1155
68 77 15 5929 225 1155
69 77 15 5929 225 1155
70 77 15 5929 225 1155
71 77 10 5929 100 770
72 77 10 5929 100 770
73 76 10 5776 100 760
74 76 10 5776 100 760
75 76 10 5776 100 760
76 75 10 5625 100 750
77 75 10 5625 100 750
78 74 10 5476 100 740
79 74 10 5476 100 740
80 74 6 5476 36 444
81 74 6 5476 36 444
82 74 6 5476 36 444
83 74 6 5476 36 444
84 73 6 5329 36 438
85 72 6 5184 36 432
86 72 3 5184 9 216
87 72 3 5184 9 216
88 72 3 5184 9 216
89 71 3 5041 9 213
90 71 3 5041 9 213
171
91 69 3 4761 9 207
92 67 1 4489 1 67
93 67 1 4489 1 67
94 64 1 4096 1 64
Total 7436 3742 590684 232912 309320
Mean 79.11 39.81
Mean 79.106383 39.80851064
Variance 26.332647 902.672615
Observations 94 94
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 93
172
APPENDIX BB - Correlation Between Academics and Exhibition

Exhibition
Preference
1 91 97 8281 9409 8827

2 91 97 8281 9409 8827
3 90 96 8100 9216 8640
4 89 96 7921 9216 8544
5 88 92 7744 8464 8096
6 88 92 7744 8464 8096
7 88 89 7744 7921 7832
8 88 88 7744 7744 7744
9 88 88 7744 7744 7744
10 87 82 7569 6724 7134
11 87 82 7569 6724 7134
12 87 82 7569 6724 7134
13 86 82 7396 6724 7052
14 86 81 7396 6561 6966
15 86 81 7396 6561 6966
16 86 73 7396 5329 6278
17 86 73 7396 5329 6278
18 85 73 7225 5329 6205
19 84 73 7056 5329 6132
20 84 73 7056 5329 6132
21 84 72 7056 5184 6048
22 84 72 7056 5184 6048
23 84 63 7056 3969 5292
24 84 63 7056 3969 5292
25 84 63 7056 3969 5292
26 84 63 7056 3969 5292
27 84 62 7056 3844 5208
28 84 62 7056 3844 5208
29 83 62 6889 3844 5146
30 83 52 6889 2704 4316
31 83 52 6889 2704 4316
32 83 52 6889 2704 4316
33 83 52 6889 2704 4316
34 83 52 6889 2704 4316
35 82 52 6724 2704 4264
36 82 52 6724 2704 4264
37 82 49 6724 2401 4018
38 82 49 6724 2401 4018
173
39 82 42 6724 1764 3444

40 82 42 6724 1764 3444
41 82 42 6724 1764 3444
42 82 42 6724 1764 3444
43 82 37 6724 1369 3034
44 81 37 6561 1369 2997
45 81 37 6561 1369 2997
46 81 37 6561 1369 2997
47 81 37 6561 1369 2997
48 81 30 6561 900 2430
49 81 30 6561 900 2430
50 80 30 6400 900 2400
51 80 30 6400 900 2400
52 80 30 6400 900 2400
53 80 28 6400 784 2240
54 80 28 6400 784 2240
55 80 28 6400 784 2240
56 80 28 6400 784 2240
57 80 21 6400 441 1680
58 79 21 6241 441 1659
59 79 21 6241 441 1659
60 79 21 6241 441 1659
61 79 21 6241 441 1659
62 79 21 6241 441 1659
63 79 15 6241 225 1185
64 79 15 6241 225 1185
65 79 15 6241 225 1185
66 78 15 6084 225 1170
67 78 15 6084 225 1170
68 78 15 6084 225 1170
69 78 15 6084 225 1170
70 77 15 5929 225 1155
71 77 10 5929 100 770
72 77 10 5929 100 770
73 77 10 5929 100 770
74 77 10 5929 100 770
75 77 10 5929 100 770
76 77 10 5929 100 770
77 76 10 5776 100 760
78 75 10 5625 100 750
79 75 10 5625 100 750
80 75 6 5625 36 450
81 75 6 5625 36 450
82 74 6 5476 36 444
83 74 6 5476 36 444
84 74 6 5476 36 444
85 74 6 5476 36 444
86 73 3 5329 9 219
87 73 3 5329 9 219
88 73 3 5329 9 219
89 72 3 5184 9 216
90 72 3 5184 9 216
174
91 71 3 5041 9 213
92 71 1 5041 1 71
93 70 1 4900 1 70
94 68 1 4624 1 68
Total 7577 3742 613099 232912 314981
Mean 80.61 39.81
Mean 80.606383 39.80851064
Variance 25.208991 902.672615
Observations 94 94
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 93
175
APPENDIX CC - Correlation Between Social Networking and

Exhibition
Social
Personality
Networking
Preference
1 85 97 7225 9409 8245

2 85 97 7225 9409 8245
3 83 96 6889 9216 7968
4 83 96 6889 9216 7968
5 83 92 6889 8464 7636
6 82 92 6724 8464 7544
7 82 89 6724 7921 7298
8 82 88 6724 7744 7216
9 82 88 6724 7744 7216
10 81 82 6561 6724 6642
11 80 82 6400 6724 6560
12 80 82 6400 6724 6560
13 80 82 6400 6724 6560
14 80 81 6400 6561 6480
15 80 81 6400 6561 6480
16 80 73 6400 5329 5840
17 80 73 6400 5329 5840
18 80 73 6400 5329 5840
19 79 73 6241 5329 5767
20 79 73 6241 5329 5767
21 79 72 6241 5184 5688
22 79 72 6241 5184 5688
23 79 63 6241 3969 4977
24 79 63 6241 3969 4977
25 79 63 6241 3969 4977
26 79 63 6241 3969 4977
27 78 62 6084 3844 4836
28 78 62 6084 3844 4836
29 78 62 6084 3844 4836
30 78 52 6084 2704 4056
31 78 52 6084 2704 4056
32 78 52 6084 2704 4056
33 78 52 6084 2704 4056
34 78 52 6084 2704 4056
35 78 52 6084 2704 4056
36 78 52 6084 2704 4056
37 78 49 6084 2401 3822
38 78 49 6084 2401 3822
176
39 78 42 6084 1764 3276

40 78 42 6084 1764 3276
41 77 42 5929 1764 3234
42 77 42 5929 1764 3234
43 77 37 5929 1369 2849
44 77 37 5929 1369 2849
45 77 37 5929 1369 2849
46 77 37 5929 1369 2849
47 77 37 5929 1369 2849
48 77 30 5929 900 2310
49 76 30 5776 900 2280
50 76 30 5776 900 2280
51 76 30 5776 900 2280
52 76 30 5776 900 2280
53 76 28 5776 784 2128
54 76 28 5776 784 2128
55 76 28 5776 784 2128
56 75 28 5625 784 2100
57 75 21 5625 441 1575
58 75 21 5625 441 1575
59 75 21 5625 441 1575
60 75 21 5625 441 1575
61 74 21 5476 441 1554
62 74 21 5476 441 1554
63 74 15 5476 225 1110
64 74 15 5476 225 1110
65 74 15 5476 225 1110
66 73 15 5329 225 1095
67 73 15 5329 225 1095
68 73 15 5329 225 1095
69 73 15 5329 225 1095
70 73 15 5329 225 1095
71 73 10 5329 100 730
72 73 10 5329 100 730
73 73 10 5329 100 730
74 72 10 5184 100 720
75 72 10 5184 100 720
76 72 10 5184 100 720
77 72 10 5184 100 720
78 72 10 5184 100 720
79 72 10 5184 100 720
80 71 6 5041 36 426
81 71 6 5041 36 426
82 71 6 5041 36 426
83 71 6 5041 36 426
84 70 6 4900 36 420
85 70 6 4900 36 420
86 69 3 4761 9 207
87 69 3 4761 9 207
88 68 3 4624 9 204
89 68 3 4624 9 204
90 67 3 4489 9 201
177
91 67 3 4489 9 201
92 66 1 4356 1 66
93 66 1 4356 1 66
94 65 1 4225 1 65
Total 7130 3742 542632 232912 295367
Mean 75.85 39.81
Mean 75.851064 39.80851064
Variance 19.504461 902.672615
Observations 94 94
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 93
178
APPENDIX DD - Correlation Between Family Relationship and

Autonomy Personality Preferences of the Generation Z of the College
Autonomy
Family
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 95 97 9025 9409 9215

2 94 96 8836 9216 9024
3 94 96 8836 9216 9024
4 93 96 8649 9216 8928
5 92 94 8464 8836 8648
6 92 94 8464 8836 8648
7 90 92 8100 8464 8280
8 89 92 7921 8464 8188
9 89 92 7921 8464 8188
10 89 92 7921 8464 8188
11 88 92 7744 8464 8096
12 88 87 7744 7569 7656
13 88 87 7744 7569 7656
14 88 87 7744 7569 7656
15 88 82 7744 6724 7216
16 88 82 7744 6724 7216
17 88 82 7744 6724 7216
18 88 82 7744 6724 7216
19 88 82 7744 6724 7216
20 88 82 7744 6724 7216
21 87 82 7569 6724 7134
22 86 82 7396 6724 7052
23 86 82 7396 6724 7052
24 86 82 7396 6724 7052
25 86 82 7396 6724 7052
26 86 82 7396 6724 7052
27 85 77 7225 5929 6545
28 85 77 7225 5929 6545
29 85 77 7225 5929 6545
30 85 77 7225 5929 6545
31 85 76 7225 5776 6460
32 85 76 7225 5776 6460
33 85 76 7225 5776 6460
34 85 70 7225 4900 5950
35 85 70 7225 4900 5950
36 85 70 7225 4900 5950
37 85 70 7225 4900 5950
38 84 70 7056 4900 5880
179
39 84 70 7056 4900 5880

40 84 70 7056 4900 5880
41 84 70 7056 4900 5880
42 84 70 7056 4900 5880
43 84 70 7056 4900 5880
44 84 62 7056 3844 5208
45 84 62 7056 3844 5208
46 84 62 7056 3844 5208
47 84 62 7056 3844 5208
48 84 62 7056 3844 5208
49 83 62 6889 3844 5146
50 83 62 6889 3844 5146
51 83 62 6889 3844 5146
52 83 62 6889 3844 5146
53 82 62 6724 3844 5084
54 82 61 6724 3721 5002
55 82 61 6724 3721 5002
56 82 53 6724 2809 4346
57 81 53 6561 2809 4293
58 81 53 6561 2809 4293
59 81 53 6561 2809 4293
60 81 53 6561 2809 4293
61 81 53 6561 2809 4293
62 81 53 6561 2809 4293
63 81 53 6561 2809 4293
64 81 52 6561 2704 4212
65 81 45 6561 2025 3645
66 80 45 6400 2025 3600
67 80 45 6400 2025 3600
68 80 43 6400 1849 3440
69 80 43 6400 1849 3440
70 80 36 6400 1296 2880
71 80 36 6400 1296 2880
72 80 36 6400 1296 2880
73 80 36 6400 1296 2880
74 79 34 6241 1156 2686
75 79 34 6241 1156 2686
76 78 34 6084 1156 2652
77 78 34 6084 1156 2652
78 78 34 6084 1156 2652
79 77 28 5929 784 2156
80 77 28 5929 784 2156
81 77 28 5929 784 2156
82 77 28 5929 784 2156
83 77 28 5929 784 2156
84 76 28 5776 784 2128
85 76 22 5776 484 1672
86 76 20 5776 400 1520
87 76 15 5776 225 1140
88 75 15 5625 225 1125
89 75 13 5625 169 975
90 74 11 5476 121 814
180
91 72 9 5184 81 648
92 72 9 5184 81 648
93 72 6 5184 36 432
94 69 1 4761 1 69
Total 7792 5556 648440 388810 472570
Mean 82.89 59.11
Mean 82.89361702 59.10638298
Variance 27.2358728 649.6229696
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 2.16341E-19
P(T<=t) two-tail 4.32682E-19
181
APPENDIX EE - Correlation Between Peer Relationship and

Autonomy
Peer
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 93 97 8649 9409 9021

2 91 96 8281 9216 8736
3 89 96 7921 9216 8544
4 88 96 7744 9216 8448
5 88 94 7744 8836 8272
6 87 94 7569 8836 8178
7 87 92 7569 8464 8004
8 86 92 7396 8464 7912
9 86 92 7396 8464 7912
10 85 92 7225 8464 7820
11 85 92 7225 8464 7820
12 84 87 7056 7569 7308
13 84 87 7056 7569 7308
14 84 87 7056 7569 7308
15 84 82 7056 6724 6888
16 84 82 7056 6724 6888
17 84 82 7056 6724 6888
18 83 82 6889 6724 6806
19 83 82 6889 6724 6806
20 83 82 6889 6724 6806
21 83 82 6889 6724 6806
22 83 82 6889 6724 6806
23 82 82 6724 6724 6724
24 82 82 6724 6724 6724
25 82 82 6724 6724 6724
26 82 82 6724 6724 6724
27 82 77 6724 5929 6314
28 82 77 6724 5929 6314
29 82 77 6724 5929 6314
30 81 77 6561 5929 6237
31 81 76 6561 5776 6156
32 81 76 6561 5776 6156
33 81 76 6561 5776 6156
34 81 70 6561 4900 5670
35 80 70 6400 4900 5600
36 80 70 6400 4900 5600
37 80 70 6400 4900 5600
38 80 70 6400 4900 5600
182
39 80 70 6400 4900 5600

40 80 70 6400 4900 5600
41 80 70 6400 4900 5600
42 79 70 6241 4900 5530
43 79 70 6241 4900 5530
44 79 62 6241 3844 4898
45 79 62 6241 3844 4898
46 79 62 6241 3844 4898
47 79 62 6241 3844 4898
48 79 62 6241 3844 4898
49 79 62 6241 3844 4898
50 79 62 6241 3844 4898
51 79 62 6241 3844 4898
52 79 62 6241 3844 4898
53 79 62 6241 3844 4898
54 79 61 6241 3721 4819
55 78 61 6084 3721 4758
56 78 53 6084 2809 4134
57 78 53 6084 2809 4134
58 78 53 6084 2809 4134
59 78 53 6084 2809 4134
60 78 53 6084 2809 4134
61 78 53 6084 2809 4134
62 78 53 6084 2809 4134
63 77 53 5929 2809 4081
64 77 52 5929 2704 4004
65 77 45 5929 2025 3465
66 77 45 5929 2025 3465
67 77 45 5929 2025 3465
68 77 43 5929 1849 3311
69 77 43 5929 1849 3311
70 77 36 5929 1296 2772
71 77 36 5929 1296 2772
72 77 36 5929 1296 2772
73 76 36 5776 1296 2736
74 76 34 5776 1156 2584
75 76 34 5776 1156 2584
76 75 34 5625 1156 2550
77 75 34 5625 1156 2550
78 74 34 5476 1156 2516
79 74 28 5476 784 2072
80 74 28 5476 784 2072
81 74 28 5476 784 2072
82 74 28 5476 784 2072
83 74 28 5476 784 2072
84 73 28 5329 784 2044
85 72 22 5184 484 1584
86 72 20 5184 400 1440
87 72 15 5184 225 1080
88 72 15 5184 225 1080
89 71 13 5041 169 923
90 71 11 5041 121 781
183
91 69 9 4761 81 621
92 67 9 4489 81 603
93 67 6 4489 36 402
94 64 1 4096 1 64
Total 7436 5556 590684 388810 451173
Mean 79.11 59.11
Mean 79.10638298 59.10638298
Variance 26.33264699 649.6229696
Observations 94 94
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 1.87317E-15
P(T<=t) two-tail 3.74635E-15
184
APPENDIX FF - Correlation Between Academics and Autonomy

Autonomy
Preference
1 91 97 8281 9409 8827

2 91 96 8281 9216 8736
3 90 96 8100 9216 8640
4 89 96 7921 9216 8544
5 88 94 7744 8836 8272
6 88 94 7744 8836 8272
7 88 92 7744 8464 8096
8 88 92 7744 8464 8096
9 88 92 7744 8464 8096
10 87 92 7569 8464 8004
11 87 92 7569 8464 8004
12 87 87 7569 7569 7569
13 86 87 7396 7569 7482
14 86 87 7396 7569 7482
15 86 82 7396 6724 7052
16 86 82 7396 6724 7052
17 86 82 7396 6724 7052
18 85 82 7225 6724 6970
19 84 82 7056 6724 6888
20 84 82 7056 6724 6888
21 84 82 7056 6724 6888
22 84 82 7056 6724 6888
23 84 82 7056 6724 6888
24 84 82 7056 6724 6888
25 84 82 7056 6724 6888
26 84 82 7056 6724 6888
27 84 77 7056 5929 6468
28 84 77 7056 5929 6468
29 83 77 6889 5929 6391
30 83 77 6889 5929 6391
31 83 76 6889 5776 6308
32 83 76 6889 5776 6308
33 83 76 6889 5776 6308
34 83 70 6889 4900 5810
35 82 70 6724 4900 5740
36 82 70 6724 4900 5740
37 82 70 6724 4900 5740
38 82 70 6724 4900 5740
185
39 82 70 6724 4900 5740

40 82 70 6724 4900 5740
41 82 70 6724 4900 5740
42 82 70 6724 4900 5740
43 82 70 6724 4900 5740
44 81 62 6561 3844 5022
45 81 62 6561 3844 5022
46 81 62 6561 3844 5022
47 81 62 6561 3844 5022
48 81 62 6561 3844 5022
49 81 62 6561 3844 5022
50 80 62 6400 3844 4960
51 80 62 6400 3844 4960
52 80 62 6400 3844 4960
53 80 62 6400 3844 4960
54 80 61 6400 3721 4880
55 80 61 6400 3721 4880
56 80 53 6400 2809 4240
57 80 53 6400 2809 4240
58 79 53 6241 2809 4187
59 79 53 6241 2809 4187
60 79 53 6241 2809 4187
61 79 53 6241 2809 4187
62 79 53 6241 2809 4187
63 79 53 6241 2809 4187
64 79 52 6241 2704 4108
65 79 45 6241 2025 3555
66 78 45 6084 2025 3510
67 78 45 6084 2025 3510
68 78 43 6084 1849 3354
69 78 43 6084 1849 3354
70 77 36 5929 1296 2772
71 77 36 5929 1296 2772
72 77 36 5929 1296 2772
73 77 36 5929 1296 2772
74 77 34 5929 1156 2618
75 77 34 5929 1156 2618
76 77 34 5929 1156 2618
77 76 34 5776 1156 2584
78 75 34 5625 1156 2550
79 75 28 5625 784 2100
80 75 28 5625 784 2100
81 75 28 5625 784 2100
82 74 28 5476 784 2072
83 74 28 5476 784 2072
84 74 28 5476 784 2072
85 74 22 5476 484 1628
86 73 20 5329 400 1460
87 73 15 5329 225 1095
88 73 15 5329 225 1095
89 72 13 5184 169 936
90 72 11 5184 121 792
186
91 71 9 5041 81 639
92 71 9 5041 81 639
93 70 6 4900 36 420
94 68 1 4624 1 68
Total 7577 5556 613099 388810 459551
Mean 80.61 59.11
Mean 80.60638298 59.10638298
Variance 25.20899108 649.6229696
Observations 94 94
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 5.35943E-17
P(T<=t) two-tail 1.07189E-16
187
APPENDIX GG - Correlation Between Social Networking and

Autonomy
Social
Personality
Networking
Preference
1 85 97 7225 9409 8245

2 85 96 7225 9216 8160
3 83 96 6889 9216 7968
4 83 96 6889 9216 7968
5 83 94 6889 8836 7802
6 82 94 6724 8836 7708
7 82 92 6724 8464 7544
8 82 92 6724 8464 7544
9 82 92 6724 8464 7544
10 81 92 6561 8464 7452
11 80 92 6400 8464 7360
12 80 87 6400 7569 6960
13 80 87 6400 7569 6960
14 80 87 6400 7569 6960
15 80 82 6400 6724 6560
16 80 82 6400 6724 6560
17 80 82 6400 6724 6560
18 80 82 6400 6724 6560
19 79 82 6241 6724 6478
20 79 82 6241 6724 6478
21 79 82 6241 6724 6478
22 79 82 6241 6724 6478
23 79 82 6241 6724 6478
24 79 82 6241 6724 6478
25 79 82 6241 6724 6478
26 79 82 6241 6724 6478
27 78 77 6084 5929 6006
28 78 77 6084 5929 6006
29 78 77 6084 5929 6006
30 78 77 6084 5929 6006
31 78 76 6084 5776 5928
32 78 76 6084 5776 5928
33 78 76 6084 5776 5928
34 78 70 6084 4900 5460
35 78 70 6084 4900 5460
36 78 70 6084 4900 5460
37 78 70 6084 4900 5460
38 78 70 6084 4900 5460
188
39 78 70 6084 4900 5460

40 78 70 6084 4900 5460
41 77 70 5929 4900 5390
42 77 70 5929 4900 5390
43 77 70 5929 4900 5390
44 77 62 5929 3844 4774
45 77 62 5929 3844 4774
46 77 62 5929 3844 4774
47 77 62 5929 3844 4774
48 77 62 5929 3844 4774
49 76 62 5776 3844 4712
50 76 62 5776 3844 4712
51 76 62 5776 3844 4712
52 76 62 5776 3844 4712
53 76 62 5776 3844 4712
54 76 61 5776 3721 4636
55 76 61 5776 3721 4636
56 75 53 5625 2809 3975
57 75 53 5625 2809 3975
58 75 53 5625 2809 3975
59 75 53 5625 2809 3975
60 75 53 5625 2809 3975
61 74 53 5476 2809 3922
62 74 53 5476 2809 3922
63 74 53 5476 2809 3922
64 74 52 5476 2704 3848
65 74 45 5476 2025 3330
66 73 45 5329 2025 3285
67 73 45 5329 2025 3285
68 73 43 5329 1849 3139
69 73 43 5329 1849 3139
70 73 36 5329 1296 2628
71 73 36 5329 1296 2628
72 73 36 5329 1296 2628
73 73 36 5329 1296 2628
74 72 34 5184 1156 2448
75 72 34 5184 1156 2448
76 72 34 5184 1156 2448
77 72 34 5184 1156 2448
78 72 34 5184 1156 2448
79 72 28 5184 784 2016
80 71 28 5041 784 1988
81 71 28 5041 784 1988
82 71 28 5041 784 1988
83 71 28 5041 784 1988
84 70 28 4900 784 1960
85 70 22 4900 484 1540
86 69 20 4761 400 1380
87 69 15 4761 225 1035
88 68 15 4624 225 1020
89 68 13 4624 169 884
90 67 11 4489 121 737
189
91 67 9 4489 81 603
92 66 9 4356 81 594
93 66 6 4356 36 396
94 65 1 4225 1 65
Total 7130 5556 542632 388810 431740
Mean 75.85 59.11
Mean 75.85106383 59.10638298
Variance 19.50446122 649.6229696
Observations 94 94
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 8.02718E-12
P(T<=t) two-tail 1.60544E-11
190
APPENDIX HH - Correlation Between Family Relationship and

Affiliation Personality Preferences of the Generation Z of the College
Affiliation
Family
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 95 96 9025 9216 9120

2 94 94 8836 8836 8836
3 94 93 8836 8649 8742
4 93 89 8649 7921 8277
5 92 84 8464 7056 7728
6 92 84 8464 7056 7728
7 90 84 8100 7056 7560
8 89 79 7921 6241 7031
9 89 79 7921 6241 7031
10 89 77 7921 5929 6853
11 88 68 7744 4624 5984
12 88 64 7744 4096 5632
13 88 64 7744 4096 5632
14 88 58 7744 3364 5104
15 88 58 7744 3364 5104
16 88 58 7744 3364 5104
17 88 58 7744 3364 5104
18 88 58 7744 3364 5104
19 88 58 7744 3364 5104
20 88 54 7744 2916 4752
21 87 54 7569 2916 4698
22 86 54 7396 2916 4644
23 86 50 7396 2500 4300
24 86 50 7396 2500 4300
25 86 50 7396 2500 4300
26 86 50 7396 2500 4300
27 85 45 7225 2025 3825
28 85 45 7225 2025 3825
29 85 41 7225 1681 3485
30 85 41 7225 1681 3485
31 85 41 7225 1681 3485
32 85 41 7225 1681 3485
33 85 41 7225 1681 3485
34 85 41 7225 1681 3485
35 85 36 7225 1296 3060
36 85 36 7225 1296 3060
37 85 36 7225 1296 3060
38 84 36 7056 1296 3024
191
39 84 36 7056 1296 3024

40 84 32 7056 1024 2688
41 84 32 7056 1024 2688
42 84 32 7056 1024 2688
43 84 32 7056 1024 2688
44 84 32 7056 1024 2688
45 84 32 7056 1024 2688
46 84 32 7056 1024 2688
47 84 32 7056 1024 2688
48 84 32 7056 1024 2688
49 83 28 6889 784 2324
50 83 24 6889 576 1992
51 83 24 6889 576 1992
52 83 24 6889 576 1992
53 82 24 6724 576 1968
54 82 24 6724 576 1968
55 82 24 6724 576 1968
56 82 24 6724 576 1968
57 81 24 6561 576 1944
58 81 24 6561 576 1944
59 81 21 6561 441 1701
60 81 17 6561 289 1377
61 81 17 6561 289 1377
62 81 17 6561 289 1377
63 81 17 6561 289 1377
64 81 17 6561 289 1377
65 81 17 6561 289 1377
66 80 17 6400 289 1360
67 80 16 6400 256 1280
68 80 16 6400 256 1280
69 80 12 6400 144 960
70 80 12 6400 144 960
71 80 12 6400 144 960
72 80 12 6400 144 960
73 80 12 6400 144 960
74 79 12 6241 144 948
75 79 11 6241 121 869
76 78 7 6084 49 546
77 78 7 6084 49 546
78 78 7 6084 49 546
79 77 4 5929 16 308
80 77 4 5929 16 308
81 77 4 5929 16 308
82 77 4 5929 16 308
83 77 4 5929 16 308
84 76 4 5776 16 304
85 76 3 5776 9 228
86 76 3 5776 9 228
87 76 3 5776 9 228
88 75 3 5625 9 225
89 75 3 5625 9 225
90 74 2 5476 4 148
192
91 72 2 5184 4 144
92 72 2 5184 4 144
93 72 1 5184 1 72
94 69 1 4761 1 69
Total 7792 3136 648440 166012 271805
Mean 82.89 33.36
Mean 82.89361702 33.36170213
Variance 27.2358728 660.104324
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 1.36642E-40
P(T<=t) two-tail 2.73283E-40
193
APPENDIX II - Correlation Between Peer Relationship and Affiliation

Affiliation
Peer
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 93 96 8649 9216 8928

2 91 94 8281 8836 8554
3 89 93 7921 8649 8277
4 88 89 7744 7921 7832
5 88 84 7744 7056 7392
6 87 84 7569 7056 7308
7 87 84 7569 7056 7308
8 86 79 7396 6241 6794
9 86 79 7396 6241 6794
10 85 77 7225 5929 6545
11 85 68 7225 4624 5780
12 84 64 7056 4096 5376
13 84 64 7056 4096 5376
14 84 58 7056 3364 4872
15 84 58 7056 3364 4872
16 84 58 7056 3364 4872
17 84 58 7056 3364 4872
18 83 58 6889 3364 4814
19 83 58 6889 3364 4814
20 83 54 6889 2916 4482
21 83 54 6889 2916 4482
22 83 54 6889 2916 4482
23 82 50 6724 2500 4100
24 82 50 6724 2500 4100
25 82 50 6724 2500 4100
26 82 50 6724 2500 4100
27 82 45 6724 2025 3690
28 82 45 6724 2025 3690
29 82 41 6724 1681 3362
30 81 41 6561 1681 3321
31 81 41 6561 1681 3321
32 81 41 6561 1681 3321
33 81 41 6561 1681 3321
34 81 41 6561 1681 3321
35 80 36 6400 1296 2880
36 80 36 6400 1296 2880
37 80 36 6400 1296 2880
38 80 36 6400 1296 2880
194
39 80 36 6400 1296 2880

40 80 32 6400 1024 2560
41 80 32 6400 1024 2560
42 79 32 6241 1024 2528
43 79 32 6241 1024 2528
44 79 32 6241 1024 2528
45 79 32 6241 1024 2528
46 79 32 6241 1024 2528
47 79 32 6241 1024 2528
48 79 32 6241 1024 2528
49 79 28 6241 784 2212
50 79 24 6241 576 1896
51 79 24 6241 576 1896
52 79 24 6241 576 1896
53 79 24 6241 576 1896
54 79 24 6241 576 1896
55 78 24 6084 576 1872
56 78 24 6084 576 1872
57 78 24 6084 576 1872
58 78 24 6084 576 1872
59 78 21 6084 441 1638
60 78 17 6084 289 1326
61 78 17 6084 289 1326
62 78 17 6084 289 1326
63 77 17 5929 289 1309
64 77 17 5929 289 1309
65 77 17 5929 289 1309
66 77 17 5929 289 1309
67 77 16 5929 256 1232
68 77 16 5929 256 1232
69 77 12 5929 144 924
70 77 12 5929 144 924
71 77 12 5929 144 924
72 77 12 5929 144 924
73 76 12 5776 144 912
74 76 12 5776 144 912
75 76 11 5776 121 836
76 75 7 5625 49 525
77 75 7 5625 49 525
78 74 7 5476 49 518
79 74 4 5476 16 296
80 74 4 5476 16 296
81 74 4 5476 16 296
82 74 4 5476 16 296
83 74 4 5476 16 296
84 73 4 5329 16 292
85 72 3 5184 9 216
86 72 3 5184 9 216
87 72 3 5184 9 216
88 72 3 5184 9 216
89 71 3 5041 9 213
90 71 2 5041 4 142
195
91 69 2 4761 4 138
92 67 2 4489 4 134
93 67 1 4489 1 67
94 64 1 4096 1 64
Total 7436 3136 590684 166012 259603
Mean 79.11 33.36
Mean 79.10638298 33.36170213
Variance 26.33264699 660.104324
Observations 94 94
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 1.19581E-37
P(T<=t) two-tail 2.39162E-37
196
APPENDIX JJ - Correlation Between Academics and Affiliation

Affiliation
Preference
1 91 96 8281 9216 8736

2 91 94 8281 8836 8554
3 90 93 8100 8649 8370
4 89 89 7921 7921 7921
5 88 84 7744 7056 7392
6 88 84 7744 7056 7392
7 88 84 7744 7056 7392
8 88 79 7744 6241 6952
9 88 79 7744 6241 6952
10 87 77 7569 5929 6699
11 87 68 7569 4624 5916
12 87 64 7569 4096 5568
13 86 64 7396 4096 5504
14 86 58 7396 3364 4988
15 86 58 7396 3364 4988
16 86 58 7396 3364 4988
17 86 58 7396 3364 4988
18 85 58 7225 3364 4930
19 84 58 7056 3364 4872
20 84 54 7056 2916 4536
21 84 54 7056 2916 4536
22 84 54 7056 2916 4536
23 84 50 7056 2500 4200
24 84 50 7056 2500 4200
25 84 50 7056 2500 4200
26 84 50 7056 2500 4200
27 84 45 7056 2025 3780
28 84 45 7056 2025 3780
29 83 41 6889 1681 3403
30 83 41 6889 1681 3403
31 83 41 6889 1681 3403
32 83 41 6889 1681 3403
33 83 41 6889 1681 3403
34 83 41 6889 1681 3403
35 82 36 6724 1296 2952
36 82 36 6724 1296 2952
37 82 36 6724 1296 2952
38 82 36 6724 1296 2952
197
39 82 36 6724 1296 2952

40 82 32 6724 1024 2624
41 82 32 6724 1024 2624
42 82 32 6724 1024 2624
43 82 32 6724 1024 2624
44 81 32 6561 1024 2592
45 81 32 6561 1024 2592
46 81 32 6561 1024 2592
47 81 32 6561 1024 2592
48 81 32 6561 1024 2592
49 81 28 6561 784 2268
50 80 24 6400 576 1920
51 80 24 6400 576 1920
52 80 24 6400 576 1920
53 80 24 6400 576 1920
54 80 24 6400 576 1920
55 80 24 6400 576 1920
56 80 24 6400 576 1920
57 80 24 6400 576 1920
58 79 24 6241 576 1896
59 79 21 6241 441 1659
60 79 17 6241 289 1343
61 79 17 6241 289 1343
62 79 17 6241 289 1343
63 79 17 6241 289 1343
64 79 17 6241 289 1343
65 79 17 6241 289 1343
66 78 17 6084 289 1326
67 78 16 6084 256 1248
68 78 16 6084 256 1248
69 78 12 6084 144 936
70 77 12 5929 144 924
71 77 12 5929 144 924
72 77 12 5929 144 924
73 77 12 5929 144 924
74 77 12 5929 144 924
75 77 11 5929 121 847
76 77 7 5929 49 539
77 76 7 5776 49 532
78 75 7 5625 49 525
79 75 4 5625 16 300
80 75 4 5625 16 300
81 75 4 5625 16 300
82 74 4 5476 16 296
83 74 4 5476 16 296
84 74 4 5476 16 296
85 74 3 5476 9 222
86 73 3 5329 9 219
87 73 3 5329 9 219
88 73 3 5329 9 219
89 72 3 5184 9 216
90 72 2 5184 4 144
198
91 71 2 5041 4 142
92 71 2 5041 4 142
93 70 1 4900 1 70
94 68 1 4624 1 68
Total 7577 3136 613099 166012 264215
Mean 80.61 33.36
Mean 80.60638298 33.36170213
Variance 25.20899108 660.104324
Observations 94 94
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 93
P(T<=t) two-tail 2.10941E-38
199
APPENDIX KK - Correlation Between Social Networking and

Affiliation Personality Preferences of the Generation Z of the College
Affiliation
Social
Personality
Networking
Preference
1 85 96 7225 9216 8160

2 85 94 7225 8836 7990
3 83 93 6889 8649 7719
4 83 89 6889 7921 7387
5 83 84 6889 7056 6972
6 82 84 6724 7056 6888
7 82 84 6724 7056 6888
8 82 79 6724 6241 6478
9 82 79 6724 6241 6478
10 81 77 6561 5929 6237
11 80 68 6400 4624 5440
12 80 64 6400 4096 5120
13 80 64 6400 4096 5120
14 80 58 6400 3364 4640
15 80 58 6400 3364 4640
16 80 58 6400 3364 4640
17 80 58 6400 3364 4640
18 80 58 6400 3364 4640
19 79 58 6241 3364 4582
20 79 54 6241 2916 4266
21 79 54 6241 2916 4266
22 79 54 6241 2916 4266
23 79 50 6241 2500 3950
24 79 50 6241 2500 3950
25 79 50 6241 2500 3950
26 79 50 6241 2500 3950
27 78 45 6084 2025 3510
28 78 45 6084 2025 3510
29 78 41 6084 1681 3198
30 78 41 6084 1681 3198
31 78 41 6084 1681 3198
32 78 41 6084 1681 3198
33 78 41 6084 1681 3198
34 78 41 6084 1681 3198
35 78 36 6084 1296 2808
36 78 36 6084 1296 2808
37 78 36 6084 1296 2808
38 78 36 6084 1296 2808
200
39 78 36 6084 1296 2808

40 78 32 6084 1024 2496
41 77 32 5929 1024 2464
42 77 32 5929 1024 2464
43 77 32 5929 1024 2464
44 77 32 5929 1024 2464
45 77 32 5929 1024 2464
46 77 32 5929 1024 2464
47 77 32 5929 1024 2464
48 77 32 5929 1024 2464
49 76 28 5776 784 2128
50 76 24 5776 576 1824
51 76 24 5776 576 1824
52 76 24 5776 576 1824
53 76 24 5776 576 1824
54 76 24 5776 576 1824
55 76 24 5776 576 1824
56 75 24 5625 576 1800
57 75 24 5625 576 1800
58 75 24 5625 576 1800
59 75 21 5625 441 1575
60 75 17 5625 289 1275
61 74 17 5476 289 1258
62 74 17 5476 289 1258
63 74 17 5476 289 1258
64 74 17 5476 289 1258
65 74 17 5476 289 1258
66 73 17 5329 289 1241
67 73 16 5329 256 1168
68 73 16 5329 256 1168
69 73 12 5329 144 876
70 73 12 5329 144 876
71 73 12 5329 144 876
72 73 12 5329 144 876
73 73 12 5329 144 876
74 72 12 5184 144 864
75 72 11 5184 121 792
76 72 7 5184 49 504
77 72 7 5184 49 504
78 72 7 5184 49 504
79 72 4 5184 16 288
80 71 4 5041 16 284
81 71 4 5041 16 284
82 71 4 5041 16 284
83 71 4 5041 16 284
84 70 4 4900 16 280
85 70 3 4900 9 210
86 69 3 4761 9 207
87 69 3 4761 9 207
88 68 3 4624 9 204
89 68 3 4624 9 204
90 67 2 4489 4 134
201
91 67 2 4489 4 134
92 66 2 4356 4 132
93 66 1 4356 1 66
94 65 1 4225 1 65
Total 7130 3136 542632 166012 247717
Mean 75.85 33.36
Mean 75.85106383 33.36170213
Variance 19.50446122 660.104324
Observations 94 94
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 3.69463E-34
P(T<=t) two-tail 7.38927E-34
202
APPENDIX LL - Correlation Between Family Relationship and

Intraception Personality Preferences of the Generation Z of the
Intraception
Family
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 95 97 9025 9409 9215

2 94 90 8836 8100 8460
3 94 90 8836 8100 8460
4 93 90 8649 8100 8370
5 92 90 8464 8100 8280
6 92 85 8464 7225 7820
7 90 85 8100 7225 7650
8 89 85 7921 7225 7565
9 89 84 7921 7056 7476
10 89 80 7921 6400 7120
11 88 80 7744 6400 7040
12 88 80 7744 6400 7040
13 88 80 7744 6400 7040
14 88 80 7744 6400 7040
15 88 80 7744 6400 7040
16 88 78 7744 6084 6864
17 88 73 7744 5329 6424
18 88 73 7744 5329 6424
19 88 73 7744 5329 6424
20 88 73 7744 5329 6424
21 87 73 7569 5329 6351
22 86 73 7396 5329 6278
23 86 66 7396 4356 5676
24 86 66 7396 4356 5676
25 86 66 7396 4356 5676
26 86 66 7396 4356 5676
27 85 66 7225 4356 5610
28 85 66 7225 4356 5610
29 85 64 7225 4096 5440
30 85 58 7225 3364 4930
31 85 58 7225 3364 4930
32 85 58 7225 3364 4930
33 85 58 7225 3364 4930
34 85 58 7225 3364 4930
35 85 58 7225 3364 4930
36 85 58 7225 3364 4930
37 85 51 7225 2601 4335
38 84 51 7056 2601 4284
203
39 84 51 7056 2601 4284

40 84 49 7056 2401 4116
41 84 49 7056 2401 4116
42 84 49 7056 2401 4116
43 84 49 7056 2401 4116
44 84 49 7056 2401 4116
45 84 45 7056 2025 3780
46 84 45 7056 2025 3780
47 84 45 7056 2025 3780
48 84 45 7056 2025 3780
49 83 45 6889 2025 3735
50 83 45 6889 2025 3735
51 83 45 6889 2025 3735
52 83 43 6889 1849 3569
53 82 43 6724 1849 3526
54 82 43 6724 1849 3526
55 82 43 6724 1849 3526
56 82 43 6724 1849 3526
57 81 43 6561 1849 3483
58 81 43 6561 1849 3483
59 81 43 6561 1849 3483
60 81 43 6561 1849 3483
61 81 43 6561 1849 3483
62 81 39 6561 1521 3159
63 81 35 6561 1225 2835
64 81 35 6561 1225 2835
65 81 35 6561 1225 2835
66 80 35 6400 1225 2800
67 80 35 6400 1225 2800
68 80 35 6400 1225 2800
69 80 32 6400 1024 2560
70 80 32 6400 1024 2560
71 80 32 6400 1024 2560
72 80 28 6400 784 2240
73 80 28 6400 784 2240
74 79 28 6241 784 2212
75 79 28 6241 784 2212
76 78 25 6084 625 1950
77 78 25 6084 625 1950
78 78 22 6084 484 1716
79 77 22 5929 484 1694
80 77 22 5929 484 1694
81 77 22 5929 484 1694
82 77 22 5929 484 1694
83 77 17 5929 289 1309
84 76 16 5776 256 1216
85 76 16 5776 256 1216
86 76 16 5776 256 1216
87 76 16 5776 256 1216
88 75 16 5625 256 1200
89 75 13 5625 169 975
90 74 12 5476 144 888
204
91 72 9 5184 81 648
92 72 9 5184 81 648
93 72 5 5184 25 360
94 69 4 4761 16 276
Total 7792 4567 648440 274085 389783
Mean 82.89 48.59
Mean 82.89361702 48.58510638
Variance 27.2358728 561.2561199
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 4.35695E-32
205
APPENDIX MM - Correlation Between Peer Relationship and

Intraception
Peer
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 93 97 8649 9409 9021

2 91 90 8281 8100 8190
3 89 90 7921 8100 8010
4 88 90 7744 8100 7920
5 88 90 7744 8100 7920
6 87 85 7569 7225 7395
7 87 85 7569 7225 7395
8 86 85 7396 7225 7310
9 86 84 7396 7056 7224
10 85 80 7225 6400 6800
11 85 80 7225 6400 6800
12 84 80 7056 6400 6720
13 84 80 7056 6400 6720
14 84 80 7056 6400 6720
15 84 80 7056 6400 6720
16 84 78 7056 6084 6552
17 84 73 7056 5329 6132
18 83 73 6889 5329 6059
19 83 73 6889 5329 6059
20 83 73 6889 5329 6059
21 83 73 6889 5329 6059
22 83 73 6889 5329 6059
23 82 66 6724 4356 5412
24 82 66 6724 4356 5412
25 82 66 6724 4356 5412
26 82 66 6724 4356 5412
27 82 66 6724 4356 5412
28 82 66 6724 4356 5412
29 82 64 6724 4096 5248
30 81 58 6561 3364 4698
31 81 58 6561 3364 4698
32 81 58 6561 3364 4698
33 81 58 6561 3364 4698
34 81 58 6561 3364 4698
35 80 58 6400 3364 4640
36 80 58 6400 3364 4640
37 80 51 6400 2601 4080
38 80 51 6400 2601 4080
206
39 80 51 6400 2601 4080

40 80 49 6400 2401 3920
41 80 49 6400 2401 3920
42 79 49 6241 2401 3871
43 79 49 6241 2401 3871
44 79 49 6241 2401 3871
45 79 45 6241 2025 3555
46 79 45 6241 2025 3555
47 79 45 6241 2025 3555
48 79 45 6241 2025 3555
49 79 45 6241 2025 3555
50 79 45 6241 2025 3555
51 79 45 6241 2025 3555
52 79 43 6241 1849 3397
53 79 43 6241 1849 3397
54 79 43 6241 1849 3397
55 78 43 6084 1849 3354
56 78 43 6084 1849 3354
57 78 43 6084 1849 3354
58 78 43 6084 1849 3354
59 78 43 6084 1849 3354
60 78 43 6084 1849 3354
61 78 43 6084 1849 3354
62 78 39 6084 1521 3042
63 77 35 5929 1225 2695
64 77 35 5929 1225 2695
65 77 35 5929 1225 2695
66 77 35 5929 1225 2695
67 77 35 5929 1225 2695
68 77 35 5929 1225 2695
69 77 32 5929 1024 2464
70 77 32 5929 1024 2464
71 77 32 5929 1024 2464
72 77 28 5929 784 2156
73 76 28 5776 784 2128
74 76 28 5776 784 2128
75 76 28 5776 784 2128
76 75 25 5625 625 1875
77 75 25 5625 625 1875
78 74 22 5476 484 1628
79 74 22 5476 484 1628
80 74 22 5476 484 1628
81 74 22 5476 484 1628
82 74 22 5476 484 1628
83 74 17 5476 289 1258
84 73 16 5329 256 1168
85 72 16 5184 256 1152
86 72 16 5184 256 1152
87 72 16 5184 256 1152
88 72 16 5184 256 1152
89 71 13 5041 169 923
90 71 12 5041 144 852
207
91 69 9 4761 81 621
92 67 9 4489 81 603
93 67 5 4489 25 335
94 64 4 4096 16 256
Total 7436 4567 590684 274085 372239
Mean 79.11 48.59
t-Test: Paired Two Sample for

Means
Mean 79.10638298 48.58510638
Variance 26.33264699 561.2561199
Observations 94 94
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 2.47802E-28
P(T<=t) two-tail 4.95603E-28
208
APPENDIX NN - Correlation Between Academics and Intraception

Intraception
Preference
1 91 97 8281 9409 8827

2 91 90 8281 8100 8190
3 90 90 8100 8100 8100
4 89 90 7921 8100 8010
5 88 90 7744 8100 7920
6 88 85 7744 7225 7480
7 88 85 7744 7225 7480
8 88 85 7744 7225 7480
9 88 84 7744 7056 7392
10 87 80 7569 6400 6960
11 87 80 7569 6400 6960
12 87 80 7569 6400 6960
13 86 80 7396 6400 6880
14 86 80 7396 6400 6880
15 86 80 7396 6400 6880
16 86 78 7396 6084 6708
17 86 73 7396 5329 6278
18 85 73 7225 5329 6205
19 84 73 7056 5329 6132
20 84 73 7056 5329 6132
21 84 73 7056 5329 6132
22 84 73 7056 5329 6132
23 84 66 7056 4356 5544
24 84 66 7056 4356 5544
25 84 66 7056 4356 5544
26 84 66 7056 4356 5544
27 84 66 7056 4356 5544
28 84 66 7056 4356 5544
29 83 64 6889 4096 5312
30 83 58 6889 3364 4814
31 83 58 6889 3364 4814
32 83 58 6889 3364 4814
33 83 58 6889 3364 4814
34 83 58 6889 3364 4814
35 82 58 6724 3364 4756
36 82 58 6724 3364 4756
37 82 51 6724 2601 4182
38 82 51 6724 2601 4182
209
39 82 51 6724 2601 4182

40 82 49 6724 2401 4018
41 82 49 6724 2401 4018
42 82 49 6724 2401 4018
43 82 49 6724 2401 4018
44 81 49 6561 2401 3969
45 81 45 6561 2025 3645
46 81 45 6561 2025 3645
47 81 45 6561 2025 3645
48 81 45 6561 2025 3645
49 81 45 6561 2025 3645
50 80 45 6400 2025 3600
51 80 45 6400 2025 3600
52 80 43 6400 1849 3440
53 80 43 6400 1849 3440
54 80 43 6400 1849 3440
55 80 43 6400 1849 3440
56 80 43 6400 1849 3440
57 80 43 6400 1849 3440
58 79 43 6241 1849 3397
59 79 43 6241 1849 3397
60 79 43 6241 1849 3397
61 79 43 6241 1849 3397
62 79 39 6241 1521 3081
63 79 35 6241 1225 2765
64 79 35 6241 1225 2765
65 79 35 6241 1225 2765
66 78 35 6084 1225 2730
67 78 35 6084 1225 2730
68 78 35 6084 1225 2730
69 78 32 6084 1024 2496
70 77 32 5929 1024 2464
71 77 32 5929 1024 2464
72 77 28 5929 784 2156
73 77 28 5929 784 2156
74 77 28 5929 784 2156
75 77 28 5929 784 2156
76 77 25 5929 625 1925
77 76 25 5776 625 1900
78 75 22 5625 484 1650
79 75 22 5625 484 1650
80 75 22 5625 484 1650
81 75 22 5625 484 1650
82 74 22 5476 484 1628
83 74 17 5476 289 1258
84 74 16 5476 256 1184
85 74 16 5476 256 1184
86 73 16 5329 256 1168
87 73 16 5329 256 1168
88 73 16 5329 256 1168
89 72 13 5184 169 936
90 72 12 5184 144 864
210
91 71 9 5041 81 639
92 71 9 5041 81 639
93 70 5 4900 25 350
94 68 4 4624 16 272
Total 7577 4567 613099 274085 379013
Mean 80.61 48.59
Mean 80.60638298 48.58510638
Variance 25.20899108 561.2561199
Observations 94 94
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 93
P(T<=t) two-tail 1.92088E-29
211
APPENDIX OO - Correlation Between Social Networking and

Intraception
Social
Personality
Networking
Preference
1 85 97 7225 9409 8245

2 85 90 7225 8100 7650
3 83 90 6889 8100 7470
4 83 90 6889 8100 7470
5 83 90 6889 8100 7470
6 82 85 6724 7225 6970
7 82 85 6724 7225 6970
8 82 85 6724 7225 6970
9 82 84 6724 7056 6888
10 81 80 6561 6400 6480
11 80 80 6400 6400 6400
12 80 80 6400 6400 6400
13 80 80 6400 6400 6400
14 80 80 6400 6400 6400
15 80 80 6400 6400 6400
16 80 78 6400 6084 6240
17 80 73 6400 5329 5840
18 80 73 6400 5329 5840
19 79 73 6241 5329 5767
20 79 73 6241 5329 5767
21 79 73 6241 5329 5767
22 79 73 6241 5329 5767
23 79 66 6241 4356 5214
24 79 66 6241 4356 5214
25 79 66 6241 4356 5214
26 79 66 6241 4356 5214
27 78 66 6084 4356 5148
28 78 66 6084 4356 5148
29 78 64 6084 4096 4992
30 78 58 6084 3364 4524
31 78 58 6084 3364 4524
32 78 58 6084 3364 4524
33 78 58 6084 3364 4524
34 78 58 6084 3364 4524
35 78 58 6084 3364 4524
36 78 58 6084 3364 4524
37 78 51 6084 2601 3978
38 78 51 6084 2601 3978
212
39 78 51 6084 2601 3978

40 78 49 6084 2401 3822
41 77 49 5929 2401 3773
42 77 49 5929 2401 3773
43 77 49 5929 2401 3773
44 77 49 5929 2401 3773
45 77 45 5929 2025 3465
46 77 45 5929 2025 3465
47 77 45 5929 2025 3465
48 77 45 5929 2025 3465
49 76 45 5776 2025 3420
50 76 45 5776 2025 3420
51 76 45 5776 2025 3420
52 76 43 5776 1849 3268
53 76 43 5776 1849 3268
54 76 43 5776 1849 3268
55 76 43 5776 1849 3268
56 75 43 5625 1849 3225
57 75 43 5625 1849 3225
58 75 43 5625 1849 3225
59 75 43 5625 1849 3225
60 75 43 5625 1849 3225
61 74 43 5476 1849 3182
62 74 39 5476 1521 2886
63 74 35 5476 1225 2590
64 74 35 5476 1225 2590
65 74 35 5476 1225 2590
66 73 35 5329 1225 2555
67 73 35 5329 1225 2555
68 73 35 5329 1225 2555
69 73 32 5329 1024 2336
70 73 32 5329 1024 2336
71 73 32 5329 1024 2336
72 73 28 5329 784 2044
73 73 28 5329 784 2044
74 72 28 5184 784 2016
75 72 28 5184 784 2016
76 72 25 5184 625 1800
77 72 25 5184 625 1800
78 72 22 5184 484 1584
79 72 22 5184 484 1584
80 71 22 5041 484 1562
81 71 22 5041 484 1562
82 71 22 5041 484 1562
83 71 17 5041 289 1207
84 70 16 4900 256 1120
85 70 16 4900 256 1120
86 69 16 4761 256 1104
87 69 16 4761 256 1104
88 68 16 4624 256 1088
89 68 13 4624 169 884
90 67 12 4489 144 804
213
91 67 9 4489 81 603
92 66 9 4356 81 594
93 66 5 4356 25 330
94 65 4 4225 16 260
Total 7130 4567 542632 274085 355851
Mean 75.85 48.59
Mean 75.85106383 48.58510638
Variance 19.50446122 561.2561199
Observations 94 94
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 3.88035E-24
214
APPENDIX PP - Correlation Between Family Relationship and

Succorance Personality Preferences of the Generation Z of the
Succorance
Family
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 95 98 9025 9604 9310

2 94 98 8836 9604 9212
3 94 98 8836 9604 9212
4 93 96 8649 9216 8928
5 92 95 8464 9025 8740
6 92 95 8464 9025 8740
7 90 95 8100 9025 8550
8 89 93 7921 8649 8277
9 89 93 7921 8649 8277
10 89 93 7921 8649 8277
11 88 93 7744 8649 8184
12 88 93 7744 8649 8184
13 88 93 7744 8649 8184
14 88 93 7744 8649 8184
15 88 93 7744 8649 8184
16 88 90 7744 8100 7920
17 88 90 7744 8100 7920
18 88 90 7744 8100 7920
19 88 90 7744 8100 7920
20 88 90 7744 8100 7920
21 87 87 7569 7569 7569
22 86 87 7396 7569 7482
23 86 86 7396 7396 7396
24 86 86 7396 7396 7396
25 86 86 7396 7396 7396
26 86 86 7396 7396 7396
27 85 86 7225 7396 7310
28 85 83 7225 6889 7055
29 85 83 7225 6889 7055
30 85 83 7225 6889 7055
31 85 83 7225 6889 7055
32 85 83 7225 6889 7055
33 85 83 7225 6889 7055
34 85 81 7225 6561 6885
35 85 81 7225 6561 6885
36 85 81 7225 6561 6885
37 85 81 7225 6561 6885
38 84 81 7056 6561 6804
215
39 84 81 7056 6561 6804

40 84 81 7056 6561 6804
41 84 81 7056 6561 6804
42 84 78 7056 6084 6552
43 84 78 7056 6084 6552
44 84 78 7056 6084 6552
45 84 76 7056 5776 6384
46 84 76 7056 5776 6384
47 84 76 7056 5776 6384
48 84 76 7056 5776 6384
49 83 76 6889 5776 6308
50 83 76 6889 5776 6308
51 83 72 6889 5184 5976
52 83 67 6889 4489 5561
53 82 67 6724 4489 5494
54 82 67 6724 4489 5494
55 82 67 6724 4489 5494
56 82 65 6724 4225 5330
57 81 65 6561 4225 5265
58 81 65 6561 4225 5265
59 81 59 6561 3481 4779
60 81 59 6561 3481 4779
61 81 59 6561 3481 4779
62 81 59 6561 3481 4779
63 81 59 6561 3481 4779
64 81 59 6561 3481 4779
65 81 59 6561 3481 4779
66 80 59 6400 3481 4720
67 80 59 6400 3481 4720
68 80 58 6400 3364 4640
69 80 51 6400 2601 4080
70 80 51 6400 2601 4080
71 80 51 6400 2601 4080
72 80 51 6400 2601 4080
73 80 44 6400 1936 3520
74 79 44 6241 1936 3476
75 79 44 6241 1936 3476
76 78 44 6084 1936 3432
77 78 44 6084 1936 3432
78 78 44 6084 1936 3432
79 77 44 5929 1936 3388
80 77 35 5929 1225 2695
81 77 33 5929 1089 2541
82 77 33 5929 1089 2541
83 77 33 5929 1089 2541
84 76 33 5776 1089 2508
85 76 33 5776 1089 2508
86 76 33 5776 1089 2508
87 76 27 5776 729 2052
88 75 25 5625 625 1875
89 75 25 5625 625 1875
90 74 18 5476 324 1332
216
91 72 18 5184 324 1296

92 72 13 5184 169 936
93 72 13 5184 169 936
94 69 6 4761 36 414
Total 7792 6323 648440 478867 535328
Mean 82.89 67.27
Mean 82.89361702 67.26595745
Variance 27.2358728 575.7457104
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 2.05209E-12
P(T<=t) two-tail 4.10418E-12
217
APPENDIX QQ - Correlation Between Peer Relationship and

Succorance
Peer
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 93 98 8649 9604 9114

2 91 98 8281 9604 8918
3 89 98 7921 9604 8722
4 88 96 7744 9216 8448
5 88 95 7744 9025 8360
6 87 95 7569 9025 8265
7 87 95 7569 9025 8265
8 86 93 7396 8649 7998
9 86 93 7396 8649 7998
10 85 93 7225 8649 7905
11 85 93 7225 8649 7905
12 84 93 7056 8649 7812
13 84 93 7056 8649 7812
14 84 93 7056 8649 7812
15 84 93 7056 8649 7812
16 84 90 7056 8100 7560
17 84 90 7056 8100 7560
18 83 90 6889 8100 7470
19 83 90 6889 8100 7470
20 83 90 6889 8100 7470
21 83 87 6889 7569 7221
22 83 87 6889 7569 7221
23 82 86 6724 7396 7052
24 82 86 6724 7396 7052
25 82 86 6724 7396 7052
26 82 86 6724 7396 7052
27 82 86 6724 7396 7052
28 82 83 6724 6889 6806
29 82 83 6724 6889 6806
30 81 83 6561 6889 6723
31 81 83 6561 6889 6723
32 81 83 6561 6889 6723
33 81 83 6561 6889 6723
34 81 81 6561 6561 6561
35 80 81 6400 6561 6480
36 80 81 6400 6561 6480
37 80 81 6400 6561 6480
38 80 81 6400 6561 6480
218
39 80 81 6400 6561 6480

40 80 81 6400 6561 6480
41 80 81 6400 6561 6480
42 79 78 6241 6084 6162
43 79 78 6241 6084 6162
44 79 78 6241 6084 6162
45 79 76 6241 5776 6004
46 79 76 6241 5776 6004
47 79 76 6241 5776 6004
48 79 76 6241 5776 6004
49 79 76 6241 5776 6004
50 79 76 6241 5776 6004
51 79 72 6241 5184 5688
52 79 67 6241 4489 5293
53 79 67 6241 4489 5293
54 79 67 6241 4489 5293
55 78 67 6084 4489 5226
56 78 65 6084 4225 5070
57 78 65 6084 4225 5070
58 78 65 6084 4225 5070
59 78 59 6084 3481 4602
60 78 59 6084 3481 4602
61 78 59 6084 3481 4602
62 78 59 6084 3481 4602
63 77 59 5929 3481 4543
64 77 59 5929 3481 4543
65 77 59 5929 3481 4543
66 77 59 5929 3481 4543
67 77 59 5929 3481 4543
68 77 58 5929 3364 4466
69 77 51 5929 2601 3927
70 77 51 5929 2601 3927
71 77 51 5929 2601 3927
72 77 51 5929 2601 3927
73 76 44 5776 1936 3344
74 76 44 5776 1936 3344
75 76 44 5776 1936 3344
76 75 44 5625 1936 3300
77 75 44 5625 1936 3300
78 74 44 5476 1936 3256
79 74 44 5476 1936 3256
80 74 35 5476 1225 2590
81 74 33 5476 1089 2442
82 74 33 5476 1089 2442
83 74 33 5476 1089 2442
84 73 33 5329 1089 2409
85 72 33 5184 1089 2376
86 72 33 5184 1089 2376
87 72 27 5184 729 1944
88 72 25 5184 625 1800
89 71 25 5041 625 1775
90 71 18 5041 324 1278
219
91 69 18 4761 324 1242

92 67 13 4489 169 871
93 67 13 4489 169 871
94 64 6 4096 36 384
Total 7436 6323 590684 478867 510999
Mean 79.11 67.27

Means
Mean 79.10638298 67.26595745
Variance 26.33264699 575.7457104
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 2.13416E-08
P(T<=t) two-tail 4.26831E-08
220
APPENDIX RR - Correlation Between Academics and Succorance

Succorance
Preference
1 91 98 8281 9604 8918

2 91 98 8281 9604 8918
3 90 98 8100 9604 8820
4 89 96 7921 9216 8544
5 88 95 7744 9025 8360
6 88 95 7744 9025 8360
7 88 95 7744 9025 8360
8 88 93 7744 8649 8184
9 88 93 7744 8649 8184
10 87 93 7569 8649 8091
11 87 93 7569 8649 8091
12 87 93 7569 8649 8091
13 86 93 7396 8649 7998
14 86 93 7396 8649 7998
15 86 93 7396 8649 7998
16 86 90 7396 8100 7740
17 86 90 7396 8100 7740
18 85 90 7225 8100 7650
19 84 90 7056 8100 7560
20 84 90 7056 8100 7560
21 84 87 7056 7569 7308
22 84 87 7056 7569 7308
23 84 86 7056 7396 7224
24 84 86 7056 7396 7224
25 84 86 7056 7396 7224
26 84 86 7056 7396 7224
27 84 86 7056 7396 7224
28 84 83 7056 6889 6972
29 83 83 6889 6889 6889
30 83 83 6889 6889 6889
31 83 83 6889 6889 6889
32 83 83 6889 6889 6889
33 83 83 6889 6889 6889
34 83 81 6889 6561 6723
35 82 81 6724 6561 6642
36 82 81 6724 6561 6642
37 82 81 6724 6561 6642
38 82 81 6724 6561 6642
221
39 82 81 6724 6561 6642

40 82 81 6724 6561 6642
41 82 81 6724 6561 6642
42 82 78 6724 6084 6396
43 82 78 6724 6084 6396
44 81 78 6561 6084 6318
45 81 76 6561 5776 6156
46 81 76 6561 5776 6156
47 81 76 6561 5776 6156
48 81 76 6561 5776 6156
49 81 76 6561 5776 6156
50 80 76 6400 5776 6080
51 80 72 6400 5184 5760
52 80 67 6400 4489 5360
53 80 67 6400 4489 5360
54 80 67 6400 4489 5360
55 80 67 6400 4489 5360
56 80 65 6400 4225 5200
57 80 65 6400 4225 5200
58 79 65 6241 4225 5135
59 79 59 6241 3481 4661
60 79 59 6241 3481 4661
61 79 59 6241 3481 4661
62 79 59 6241 3481 4661
63 79 59 6241 3481 4661
64 79 59 6241 3481 4661
65 79 59 6241 3481 4661
66 78 59 6084 3481 4602
67 78 59 6084 3481 4602
68 78 58 6084 3364 4524
69 78 51 6084 2601 3978
70 77 51 5929 2601 3927
71 77 51 5929 2601 3927
72 77 51 5929 2601 3927
73 77 44 5929 1936 3388
74 77 44 5929 1936 3388
75 77 44 5929 1936 3388
76 77 44 5929 1936 3388
77 76 44 5776 1936 3344
78 75 44 5625 1936 3300
79 75 44 5625 1936 3300
80 75 35 5625 1225 2625
81 75 33 5625 1089 2475
82 74 33 5476 1089 2442
83 74 33 5476 1089 2442
84 74 33 5476 1089 2442
85 74 33 5476 1089 2442
86 73 33 5329 1089 2409
87 73 27 5329 729 1971
88 73 25 5329 625 1825
89 72 25 5184 625 1800
90 72 18 5184 324 1296
222
91 71 18 5041 324 1278

92 71 13 5041 169 923
93 70 13 4900 169 910
94 68 6 4624 36 408
Total 7577 6323 613099 478867 520538
Mean 80.61 67.27

Means
Mean 80.60638298 67.26595745
Variance 25.20899108 575.7457104
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 6.29535E-10
P(T<=t) two-tail 1.25907E-09
223
APPENDIX SS - Correlation Between Social Networking and

Succorance
Social
Personality
Networking
Preference
1 85 98 7225 9604 8330

2 85 98 7225 9604 8330
3 83 98 6889 9604 8134
4 83 96 6889 9216 7968
5 83 95 6889 9025 7885
6 82 95 6724 9025 7790
7 82 95 6724 9025 7790
8 82 93 6724 8649 7626
9 82 93 6724 8649 7626
10 81 93 6561 8649 7533
11 80 93 6400 8649 7440
12 80 93 6400 8649 7440
13 80 93 6400 8649 7440
14 80 93 6400 8649 7440
15 80 93 6400 8649 7440
16 80 90 6400 8100 7200
17 80 90 6400 8100 7200
18 80 90 6400 8100 7200
19 79 90 6241 8100 7110
20 79 90 6241 8100 7110
21 79 87 6241 7569 6873
22 79 87 6241 7569 6873
23 79 86 6241 7396 6794
24 79 86 6241 7396 6794
25 79 86 6241 7396 6794
26 79 86 6241 7396 6794
27 78 86 6084 7396 6708
28 78 83 6084 6889 6474
29 78 83 6084 6889 6474
30 78 83 6084 6889 6474
31 78 83 6084 6889 6474
32 78 83 6084 6889 6474
33 78 83 6084 6889 6474
34 78 81 6084 6561 6318
35 78 81 6084 6561 6318
36 78 81 6084 6561 6318
37 78 81 6084 6561 6318
38 78 81 6084 6561 6318
224
39 78 81 6084 6561 6318

40 78 81 6084 6561 6318
41 77 81 5929 6561 6237
42 77 78 5929 6084 6006
43 77 78 5929 6084 6006
44 77 78 5929 6084 6006
45 77 76 5929 5776 5852
46 77 76 5929 5776 5852
47 77 76 5929 5776 5852
48 77 76 5929 5776 5852
49 76 76 5776 5776 5776
50 76 76 5776 5776 5776
51 76 72 5776 5184 5472
52 76 67 5776 4489 5092
53 76 67 5776 4489 5092
54 76 67 5776 4489 5092
55 76 67 5776 4489 5092
56 75 65 5625 4225 4875
57 75 65 5625 4225 4875
58 75 65 5625 4225 4875
59 75 59 5625 3481 4425
60 75 59 5625 3481 4425
61 74 59 5476 3481 4366
62 74 59 5476 3481 4366
63 74 59 5476 3481 4366
64 74 59 5476 3481 4366
65 74 59 5476 3481 4366
66 73 59 5329 3481 4307
67 73 59 5329 3481 4307
68 73 58 5329 3364 4234
69 73 51 5329 2601 3723
70 73 51 5329 2601 3723
71 73 51 5329 2601 3723
72 73 51 5329 2601 3723
73 73 44 5329 1936 3212
74 72 44 5184 1936 3168
75 72 44 5184 1936 3168
76 72 44 5184 1936 3168
77 72 44 5184 1936 3168
78 72 44 5184 1936 3168
79 72 44 5184 1936 3168
80 71 35 5041 1225 2485
81 71 33 5041 1089 2343
82 71 33 5041 1089 2343
83 71 33 5041 1089 2343
84 70 33 4900 1089 2310
85 70 33 4900 1089 2310
86 69 33 4761 1089 2277
87 69 27 4761 729 1863
88 68 25 4624 625 1700
89 68 25 4624 625 1700
90 67 18 4489 324 1206
225
91 67 18 4489 324 1206

92 66 13 4356 169 858
93 66 13 4356 169 858
94 65 6 4225 36 390
Total 7130 6323 542632 478867 489244
Mean 75.85 67.27

Means
Mean 75.85106383 67.26595745
Variance 19.50446122 575.7457104
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 2.77821E-05
P(T<=t) two-tail 5.55642E-05
226
APPENDIX TT - Correlation Between Family Relationship and

Dominance Personality Preferences of the Generation Z of the
Dominance
Family
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 95 99 9025 9801 9405

2 94 95 8836 9025 8930
3 94 95 8836 9025 8930
4 93 92 8649 8464 8556
5 92 92 8464 8464 8464
6 92 87 8464 7569 8004
7 90 87 8100 7569 7830
8 89 83 7921 6889 7387
9 89 83 7921 6889 7387
10 89 83 7921 6889 7387
11 88 74 7744 5476 6512
12 88 74 7744 5476 6512
13 88 74 7744 5476 6512
14 88 74 7744 5476 6512
15 88 67 7744 4489 5896
16 88 67 7744 4489 5896
17 88 67 7744 4489 5896
18 88 67 7744 4489 5896
19 88 67 7744 4489 5896
20 88 67 7744 4489 5896
21 87 67 7569 4489 5829
22 86 63 7396 3969 5418
23 86 63 7396 3969 5418
24 86 59 7396 3481 5074
25 86 59 7396 3481 5074
26 86 59 7396 3481 5074
27 85 59 7225 3481 5015
28 85 59 7225 3481 5015
29 85 59 7225 3481 5015
30 85 51 7225 2601 4335
31 85 51 7225 2601 4335
32 85 51 7225 2601 4335
33 85 51 7225 2601 4335
34 85 51 7225 2601 4335
35 85 42 7225 1764 3570
36 85 42 7225 1764 3570
37 85 42 7225 1764 3570
38 84 42 7056 1764 3528
227
39 84 38 7056 1444 3192

40 84 38 7056 1444 3192
41 84 38 7056 1444 3192
42 84 36 7056 1296 3024
43 84 36 7056 1296 3024
44 84 36 7056 1296 3024
45 84 36 7056 1296 3024
46 84 36 7056 1296 3024
47 84 36 7056 1296 3024
48 84 36 7056 1296 3024
49 83 36 6889 1296 2988
50 83 36 6889 1296 2988
51 83 32 6889 1024 2656
52 83 28 6889 784 2324
53 82 28 6724 784 2296
54 82 28 6724 784 2296
55 82 28 6724 784 2296
56 82 27 6724 729 2214
57 81 27 6561 729 2187
58 81 27 6561 729 2187
59 81 27 6561 729 2187
60 81 23 6561 529 1863
61 81 23 6561 529 1863
62 81 23 6561 529 1863
63 81 23 6561 529 1863
64 81 21 6561 441 1701
65 81 21 6561 441 1701
66 80 21 6400 441 1680
67 80 21 6400 441 1680
68 80 17 6400 289 1360
69 80 17 6400 289 1360
70 80 17 6400 289 1360
71 80 17 6400 289 1360
72 80 13 6400 169 1040
73 80 13 6400 169 1040
74 79 11 6241 121 869
75 79 11 6241 121 869
76 78 11 6084 121 858
77 78 11 6084 121 858
78 78 11 6084 121 858
79 77 9 5929 81 693
80 77 9 5929 81 693
81 77 9 5929 81 693
82 77 9 5929 81 693
83 77 9 5929 81 693
84 76 9 5776 81 684
85 76 9 5776 81 684
86 76 9 5776 81 684
87 76 8 5776 64 608
88 75 8 5625 64 600
89 75 5 5625 25 375
90 74 5 5476 25 370
228
91 72 5 5184 25 360
92 72 5 5184 25 360
93 72 4 5184 16 288
94 69 3 4761 9 207
Total 7792 3694 648440 212748 318643
Mean 82.89 39.30
Mean 82.89361702 39.29787234
Variance 27.2358728 726.6845116
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) two-tail 4.69321E-34
229
APPENDIX UU - Correlation Between Peer Relationship and

Dominance
Peer
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 93 99 8649 9801 9207

2 91 95 8281 9025 8645
3 89 95 7921 9025 8455
4 88 92 7744 8464 8096
5 88 92 7744 8464 8096
6 87 87 7569 7569 7569
7 87 87 7569 7569 7569
8 86 83 7396 6889 7138
9 86 83 7396 6889 7138
10 85 83 7225 6889 7055
11 85 74 7225 5476 6290
12 84 74 7056 5476 6216
13 84 74 7056 5476 6216
14 84 74 7056 5476 6216
15 84 67 7056 4489 5628
16 84 67 7056 4489 5628
17 84 67 7056 4489 5628
18 83 67 6889 4489 5561
19 83 67 6889 4489 5561
20 83 67 6889 4489 5561
21 83 67 6889 4489 5561
22 83 63 6889 3969 5229
23 82 63 6724 3969 5166
24 82 59 6724 3481 4838
25 82 59 6724 3481 4838
26 82 59 6724 3481 4838
27 82 59 6724 3481 4838
28 82 59 6724 3481 4838
29 82 59 6724 3481 4838
30 81 51 6561 2601 4131
31 81 51 6561 2601 4131
32 81 51 6561 2601 4131
33 81 51 6561 2601 4131
34 81 51 6561 2601 4131
35 80 42 6400 1764 3360
36 80 42 6400 1764 3360
37 80 42 6400 1764 3360
38 80 42 6400 1764 3360
230
39 80 38 6400 1444 3040

40 80 38 6400 1444 3040
41 80 38 6400 1444 3040
42 79 36 6241 1296 2844
43 79 36 6241 1296 2844
44 79 36 6241 1296 2844
45 79 36 6241 1296 2844
46 79 36 6241 1296 2844
47 79 36 6241 1296 2844
48 79 36 6241 1296 2844
49 79 36 6241 1296 2844
50 79 36 6241 1296 2844
51 79 32 6241 1024 2528
52 79 28 6241 784 2212
53 79 28 6241 784 2212
54 79 28 6241 784 2212
55 78 28 6084 784 2184
56 78 27 6084 729 2106
57 78 27 6084 729 2106
58 78 27 6084 729 2106
59 78 27 6084 729 2106
60 78 23 6084 529 1794
61 78 23 6084 529 1794
62 78 23 6084 529 1794
63 77 23 5929 529 1771
64 77 21 5929 441 1617
65 77 21 5929 441 1617
66 77 21 5929 441 1617
67 77 21 5929 441 1617
68 77 17 5929 289 1309
69 77 17 5929 289 1309
70 77 17 5929 289 1309
71 77 17 5929 289 1309
72 77 13 5929 169 1001
73 76 13 5776 169 988
74 76 11 5776 121 836
75 76 11 5776 121 836
76 75 11 5625 121 825
77 75 11 5625 121 825
78 74 11 5476 121 814
79 74 9 5476 81 666
80 74 9 5476 81 666
81 74 9 5476 81 666
82 74 9 5476 81 666
83 74 9 5476 81 666
84 73 9 5329 81 657
85 72 9 5184 81 648
86 72 9 5184 81 648
87 72 8 5184 64 576
88 72 8 5184 64 576
89 71 5 5041 25 355
90 71 5 5041 25 355
231
91 69 5 4761 25 345
92 67 5 4489 25 335
93 67 4 4489 16 268
94 64 3 4096 9 192
Total 7436 3694 590684 212748 304307
Mean 79.11 39.30

Means
Mean 79.10638298 39.29787234
Variance 26.33264699 726.6845116
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 2.87682E-31
P(T<=t) two-tail 5.75363E-31
232
APPENDIX VV - Correlation Between Academics and Dominance

Dominance
Preference
1 91 99 8281 9801 9009

2 91 95 8281 9025 8645
3 90 95 8100 9025 8550
4 89 92 7921 8464 8188
5 88 92 7744 8464 8096
6 88 87 7744 7569 7656
7 88 87 7744 7569 7656
8 88 83 7744 6889 7304
9 88 83 7744 6889 7304
10 87 83 7569 6889 7221
11 87 74 7569 5476 6438
12 87 74 7569 5476 6438
13 86 74 7396 5476 6364
14 86 74 7396 5476 6364
15 86 67 7396 4489 5762
16 86 67 7396 4489 5762
17 86 67 7396 4489 5762
18 85 67 7225 4489 5695
19 84 67 7056 4489 5628
20 84 67 7056 4489 5628
21 84 67 7056 4489 5628
22 84 63 7056 3969 5292
23 84 63 7056 3969 5292
24 84 59 7056 3481 4956
25 84 59 7056 3481 4956
26 84 59 7056 3481 4956
27 84 59 7056 3481 4956
28 84 59 7056 3481 4956
29 83 59 6889 3481 4897
30 83 51 6889 2601 4233
31 83 51 6889 2601 4233
32 83 51 6889 2601 4233
33 83 51 6889 2601 4233
34 83 51 6889 2601 4233
35 82 42 6724 1764 3444
36 82 42 6724 1764 3444
37 82 42 6724 1764 3444
38 82 42 6724 1764 3444
233
39 82 38 6724 1444 3116

40 82 38 6724 1444 3116
41 82 38 6724 1444 3116
42 82 36 6724 1296 2952
43 82 36 6724 1296 2952
44 81 36 6561 1296 2916
45 81 36 6561 1296 2916
46 81 36 6561 1296 2916
47 81 36 6561 1296 2916
48 81 36 6561 1296 2916
49 81 36 6561 1296 2916
50 80 36 6400 1296 2880
51 80 32 6400 1024 2560
52 80 28 6400 784 2240
53 80 28 6400 784 2240
54 80 28 6400 784 2240
55 80 28 6400 784 2240
56 80 27 6400 729 2160
57 80 27 6400 729 2160
58 79 27 6241 729 2133
59 79 27 6241 729 2133
60 79 23 6241 529 1817
61 79 23 6241 529 1817
62 79 23 6241 529 1817
63 79 23 6241 529 1817
64 79 21 6241 441 1659
65 79 21 6241 441 1659
66 78 21 6084 441 1638
67 78 21 6084 441 1638
68 78 17 6084 289 1326
69 78 17 6084 289 1326
70 77 17 5929 289 1309
71 77 17 5929 289 1309
72 77 13 5929 169 1001
73 77 13 5929 169 1001
74 77 11 5929 121 847
75 77 11 5929 121 847
76 77 11 5929 121 847
77 76 11 5776 121 836
78 75 11 5625 121 825
79 75 9 5625 81 675
80 75 9 5625 81 675
81 75 9 5625 81 675
82 74 9 5476 81 666
83 74 9 5476 81 666
84 74 9 5476 81 666
85 74 9 5476 81 666
86 73 9 5329 81 657
87 73 8 5329 64 584
88 73 8 5329 64 584
89 72 5 5184 25 360
90 72 5 5184 25 360
234
91 71 5 5041 25 355
92 71 5 5041 25 355
93 70 4 4900 16 280
94 68 3 4624 9 204
Total 7577 3694 613099 212748 309798
Mean 80.61 39.30

Means
Mean 80.60638298 39.29787234
Variance 25.20899108 726.6845116
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 2.00302E-32
P(T<=t) two-tail 4.00603E-32
235
APPENDIX WW - Correlation Between Social Networking and

Dominance
Social
Personality
Networking
Preference
1 85 99 7225 9801 8415

2 85 95 7225 9025 8075
3 83 95 6889 9025 7885
4 83 92 6889 8464 7636
5 83 92 6889 8464 7636
6 82 87 6724 7569 7134
7 82 87 6724 7569 7134
8 82 83 6724 6889 6806
9 82 83 6724 6889 6806
10 81 83 6561 6889 6723
11 80 74 6400 5476 5920
12 80 74 6400 5476 5920
13 80 74 6400 5476 5920
14 80 74 6400 5476 5920
15 80 67 6400 4489 5360
16 80 67 6400 4489 5360
17 80 67 6400 4489 5360
18 80 67 6400 4489 5360
19 79 67 6241 4489 5293
20 79 67 6241 4489 5293
21 79 67 6241 4489 5293
22 79 63 6241 3969 4977
23 79 63 6241 3969 4977
24 79 59 6241 3481 4661
25 79 59 6241 3481 4661
26 79 59 6241 3481 4661
27 78 59 6084 3481 4602
28 78 59 6084 3481 4602
29 78 59 6084 3481 4602
30 78 51 6084 2601 3978
31 78 51 6084 2601 3978
32 78 51 6084 2601 3978
33 78 51 6084 2601 3978
34 78 51 6084 2601 3978
35 78 42 6084 1764 3276
36 78 42 6084 1764 3276
37 78 42 6084 1764 3276
38 78 42 6084 1764 3276
236
39 78 38 6084 1444 2964

40 78 38 6084 1444 2964
41 77 38 5929 1444 2926
42 77 36 5929 1296 2772
43 77 36 5929 1296 2772
44 77 36 5929 1296 2772
45 77 36 5929 1296 2772
46 77 36 5929 1296 2772
47 77 36 5929 1296 2772
48 77 36 5929 1296 2772
49 76 36 5776 1296 2736
50 76 36 5776 1296 2736
51 76 32 5776 1024 2432
52 76 28 5776 784 2128
53 76 28 5776 784 2128
54 76 28 5776 784 2128
55 76 28 5776 784 2128
56 75 27 5625 729 2025
57 75 27 5625 729 2025
58 75 27 5625 729 2025
59 75 27 5625 729 2025
60 75 23 5625 529 1725
61 74 23 5476 529 1702
62 74 23 5476 529 1702
63 74 23 5476 529 1702
64 74 21 5476 441 1554
65 74 21 5476 441 1554
66 73 21 5329 441 1533
67 73 21 5329 441 1533
68 73 17 5329 289 1241
69 73 17 5329 289 1241
70 73 17 5329 289 1241
71 73 17 5329 289 1241
72 73 13 5329 169 949
73 73 13 5329 169 949
74 72 11 5184 121 792
75 72 11 5184 121 792
76 72 11 5184 121 792
77 72 11 5184 121 792
78 72 11 5184 121 792
79 72 9 5184 81 648
80 71 9 5041 81 639
81 71 9 5041 81 639
82 71 9 5041 81 639
83 71 9 5041 81 639
84 70 9 4900 81 630
85 70 9 4900 81 630
86 69 9 4761 81 621
87 69 8 4761 64 552
88 68 8 4624 64 544
89 68 5 4624 25 340
90 67 5 4489 25 335
237
91 67 5 4489 25 335
92 66 5 4356 25 330
93 66 4 4356 16 264
94 65 3 4225 9 195
Total 7130 3694 542632 212748 290567
Mean 75.85 39.30

Means
Mean 75.85106383 39.29787234
Variance 19.50446122 726.6845116
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 8.31387E-28
P(T<=t) two-tail 1.66277E-27
238
APPENDIX XX - Correlation Between Family Relationship and

Abasement Personality Preferences of the Generation Z of the
Abasement
Family
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 95 99 9025 9801 9405

2 94 98 8836 9604 9212
3 94 96 8836 9216 9024
4 93 96 8649 9216 8928
5 92 96 8464 9216 8832
6 92 94 8464 8836 8648
7 90 94 8100 8836 8460
8 89 94 7921 8836 8366
9 89 93 7921 8649 8277
10 89 93 7921 8649 8277
11 88 93 7744 8649 8184
12 88 92 7744 8464 8096
13 88 90 7744 8100 7920
14 88 90 7744 8100 7920
15 88 90 7744 8100 7920
16 88 90 7744 8100 7920
17 88 90 7744 8100 7920
18 88 90 7744 8100 7920
19 88 88 7744 7744 7744
20 88 88 7744 7744 7744
21 87 86 7569 7396 7482
22 86 86 7396 7396 7396
23 86 86 7396 7396 7396
24 86 86 7396 7396 7396
25 86 84 7396 7056 7224
26 86 84 7396 7056 7224
27 85 84 7225 7056 7140
28 85 81 7225 6561 6885
29 85 81 7225 6561 6885
30 85 81 7225 6561 6885
31 85 81 7225 6561 6885
32 85 81 7225 6561 6885
33 85 81 7225 6561 6885
34 85 81 7225 6561 6885
35 85 81 7225 6561 6885
36 85 81 7225 6561 6885
37 85 79 7225 6241 6715
38 84 79 7056 6241 6636
239
39 84 75 7056 5625 6300

40 84 74 7056 5476 6216
41 84 74 7056 5476 6216
42 84 74 7056 5476 6216
43 84 74 7056 5476 6216
44 84 74 7056 5476 6216
45 84 74 7056 5476 6216
46 84 74 7056 5476 6216
47 84 67 7056 4489 5628
48 84 67 7056 4489 5628
49 83 67 6889 4489 5561
50 83 66 6889 4356 5478
51 83 66 6889 4356 5478
52 83 66 6889 4356 5478
53 82 66 6724 4356 5412
54 82 66 6724 4356 5412
55 82 66 6724 4356 5412
56 82 61 6724 3721 5002
57 81 61 6561 3721 4941
58 81 58 6561 3364 4698
59 81 58 6561 3364 4698
60 81 58 6561 3364 4698
61 81 58 6561 3364 4698
62 81 58 6561 3364 4698
63 81 58 6561 3364 4698
64 81 53 6561 2809 4293
65 81 51 6561 2601 4131
66 80 51 6400 2601 4080
67 80 51 6400 2601 4080
68 80 51 6400 2601 4080
69 80 51 6400 2601 4080
70 80 45 6400 2025 3600
71 80 45 6400 2025 3600
72 80 45 6400 2025 3600
73 80 45 6400 2025 3600
74 79 45 6241 2025 3555
75 79 45 6241 2025 3555
76 78 45 6084 2025 3510
77 78 45 6084 2025 3510
78 78 38 6084 1444 2964
79 77 37 5929 1369 2849
80 77 37 5929 1369 2849
81 77 37 5929 1369 2849
82 77 37 5929 1369 2849
83 77 37 5929 1369 2849
84 76 37 5776 1369 2812
85 76 37 5776 1369 2812
86 76 31 5776 961 2356
87 76 31 5776 961 2356
88 75 31 5625 961 2325
89 75 25 5625 625 1875
90 74 25 5476 625 1850
240
91 72 25 5184 625 1800

92 72 19 5184 361 1368
93 72 19 5184 361 1368
94 69 14 4761 196 966
Total 7792 6182 648440 454246 523092
Mean 82.89 65.77
Mean 82.89361702 65.76595745
Variance 27.2358728 512.6973233
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 1.76144E-15
P(T<=t) two-tail 3.52288E-15
241
APPENDIX YY - Correlation Between Peer Relationship and

Abasement
Peer
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 93 99 8649 9801 9207

2 91 98 8281 9604 8918
3 89 96 7921 9216 8544
4 88 96 7744 9216 8448
5 88 96 7744 9216 8448
6 87 94 7569 8836 8178
7 87 94 7569 8836 8178
8 86 94 7396 8836 8084
9 86 93 7396 8649 7998
10 85 93 7225 8649 7905
11 85 93 7225 8649 7905
12 84 92 7056 8464 7728
13 84 90 7056 8100 7560
14 84 90 7056 8100 7560
15 84 90 7056 8100 7560
16 84 90 7056 8100 7560
17 84 90 7056 8100 7560
18 83 90 6889 8100 7470
19 83 88 6889 7744 7304
20 83 88 6889 7744 7304
21 83 86 6889 7396 7138
22 83 86 6889 7396 7138
23 82 86 6724 7396 7052
24 82 86 6724 7396 7052
25 82 84 6724 7056 6888
26 82 84 6724 7056 6888
27 82 84 6724 7056 6888
28 82 81 6724 6561 6642
29 82 81 6724 6561 6642
30 81 81 6561 6561 6561
31 81 81 6561 6561 6561
32 81 81 6561 6561 6561
33 81 81 6561 6561 6561
34 81 81 6561 6561 6561
35 80 81 6400 6561 6480
36 80 81 6400 6561 6480
37 80 79 6400 6241 6320
38 80 79 6400 6241 6320
242
39 80 75 6400 5625 6000

40 80 74 6400 5476 5920
41 80 74 6400 5476 5920
42 79 74 6241 5476 5846
43 79 74 6241 5476 5846
44 79 74 6241 5476 5846
45 79 74 6241 5476 5846
46 79 74 6241 5476 5846
47 79 67 6241 4489 5293
48 79 67 6241 4489 5293
49 79 67 6241 4489 5293
50 79 66 6241 4356 5214
51 79 66 6241 4356 5214
52 79 66 6241 4356 5214
53 79 66 6241 4356 5214
54 79 66 6241 4356 5214
55 78 66 6084 4356 5148
56 78 61 6084 3721 4758
57 78 61 6084 3721 4758
58 78 58 6084 3364 4524
59 78 58 6084 3364 4524
60 78 58 6084 3364 4524
61 78 58 6084 3364 4524
62 78 58 6084 3364 4524
63 77 58 5929 3364 4466
64 77 53 5929 2809 4081
65 77 51 5929 2601 3927
66 77 51 5929 2601 3927
67 77 51 5929 2601 3927
68 77 51 5929 2601 3927
69 77 51 5929 2601 3927
70 77 45 5929 2025 3465
71 77 45 5929 2025 3465
72 77 45 5929 2025 3465
73 76 45 5776 2025 3420
74 76 45 5776 2025 3420
75 76 45 5776 2025 3420
76 75 45 5625 2025 3375
77 75 45 5625 2025 3375
78 74 38 5476 1444 2812
79 74 37 5476 1369 2738
80 74 37 5476 1369 2738
81 74 37 5476 1369 2738
82 74 37 5476 1369 2738
83 74 37 5476 1369 2738
84 73 37 5329 1369 2701
85 72 37 5184 1369 2664
86 72 31 5184 961 2232
87 72 31 5184 961 2232
88 72 31 5184 961 2232
89 71 25 5041 625 1775
90 71 25 5041 625 1775
243
91 69 25 4761 625 1725

92 67 19 4489 361 1273
93 67 19 4489 361 1273
94 64 14 4096 196 896
Total 7436 6182 590684 454246 499322
Mean 79.11 65.77
Mean 79.10638298 65.76595745
Variance 26.33264699 512.6973233
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 5.90368E-11
P(T<=t) two-tail 1.18074E-10
244
APPENDIX ZZ - Correlation Between Academics and Abasement

Abasement
Preference
1 91 99 8281 9801 9009

2 91 98 8281 9604 8918
3 90 96 8100 9216 8640
4 89 96 7921 9216 8544
5 88 96 7744 9216 8448
6 88 94 7744 8836 8272
7 88 94 7744 8836 8272
8 88 94 7744 8836 8272
9 88 93 7744 8649 8184
10 87 93 7569 8649 8091
11 87 93 7569 8649 8091
12 87 92 7569 8464 8004
13 86 90 7396 8100 7740
14 86 90 7396 8100 7740
15 86 90 7396 8100 7740
16 86 90 7396 8100 7740
17 86 90 7396 8100 7740
18 85 90 7225 8100 7650
19 84 88 7056 7744 7392
20 84 88 7056 7744 7392
21 84 86 7056 7396 7224
22 84 86 7056 7396 7224
23 84 86 7056 7396 7224
24 84 86 7056 7396 7224
25 84 84 7056 7056 7056
26 84 84 7056 7056 7056
27 84 84 7056 7056 7056
28 84 81 7056 6561 6804
29 83 81 6889 6561 6723
30 83 81 6889 6561 6723
31 83 81 6889 6561 6723
32 83 81 6889 6561 6723
33 83 81 6889 6561 6723
34 83 81 6889 6561 6723
35 82 81 6724 6561 6642
36 82 81 6724 6561 6642
37 82 79 6724 6241 6478
38 82 79 6724 6241 6478
245
39 82 75 6724 5625 6150

40 82 74 6724 5476 6068
41 82 74 6724 5476 6068
42 82 74 6724 5476 6068
43 82 74 6724 5476 6068
44 81 74 6561 5476 5994
45 81 74 6561 5476 5994
46 81 74 6561 5476 5994
47 81 67 6561 4489 5427
48 81 67 6561 4489 5427
49 81 67 6561 4489 5427
50 80 66 6400 4356 5280
51 80 66 6400 4356 5280
52 80 66 6400 4356 5280
53 80 66 6400 4356 5280
54 80 66 6400 4356 5280
55 80 66 6400 4356 5280
56 80 61 6400 3721 4880
57 80 61 6400 3721 4880
58 79 58 6241 3364 4582
59 79 58 6241 3364 4582
60 79 58 6241 3364 4582
61 79 58 6241 3364 4582
62 79 58 6241 3364 4582
63 79 58 6241 3364 4582
64 79 53 6241 2809 4187
65 79 51 6241 2601 4029
66 78 51 6084 2601 3978
67 78 51 6084 2601 3978
68 78 51 6084 2601 3978
69 78 51 6084 2601 3978
70 77 45 5929 2025 3465
71 77 45 5929 2025 3465
72 77 45 5929 2025 3465
73 77 45 5929 2025 3465
74 77 45 5929 2025 3465
75 77 45 5929 2025 3465
76 77 45 5929 2025 3465
77 76 45 5776 2025 3420
78 75 38 5625 1444 2850
79 75 37 5625 1369 2775
80 75 37 5625 1369 2775
81 75 37 5625 1369 2775
82 74 37 5476 1369 2738
83 74 37 5476 1369 2738
84 74 37 5476 1369 2738
85 74 37 5476 1369 2738
86 73 31 5329 961 2263
87 73 31 5329 961 2263
88 73 31 5329 961 2263
89 72 25 5184 625 1800
90 72 25 5184 625 1800
246
91 71 25 5041 625 1775

92 71 19 5041 361 1349
93 70 19 4900 361 1330
94 68 14 4624 196 952
Total 7577 6182 613099 454246 508667
Mean 80.61 65.77
Mean 80.60638298 65.76595745
Variance 25.20899108 512.6973233
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 1.02211E-12
P(T<=t) two-tail 2.04423E-12
247
APPENDIX AAA - Correlation Between Social Networking and

Abasement
Social
Personality
Networking
Preference
1 85 99 7225 9801 8415

2 85 98 7225 9604 8330
3 83 96 6889 9216 7968
4 83 96 6889 9216 7968
5 83 96 6889 9216 7968
6 82 94 6724 8836 7708
7 82 94 6724 8836 7708
8 82 94 6724 8836 7708
9 82 93 6724 8649 7626
10 81 93 6561 8649 7533
11 80 93 6400 8649 7440
12 80 92 6400 8464 7360
13 80 90 6400 8100 7200
14 80 90 6400 8100 7200
15 80 90 6400 8100 7200
16 80 90 6400 8100 7200
17 80 90 6400 8100 7200
18 80 90 6400 8100 7200
19 79 88 6241 7744 6952
20 79 88 6241 7744 6952
21 79 86 6241 7396 6794
22 79 86 6241 7396 6794
23 79 86 6241 7396 6794
24 79 86 6241 7396 6794
25 79 84 6241 7056 6636
26 79 84 6241 7056 6636
27 78 84 6084 7056 6552
28 78 81 6084 6561 6318
29 78 81 6084 6561 6318
30 78 81 6084 6561 6318
31 78 81 6084 6561 6318
32 78 81 6084 6561 6318
33 78 81 6084 6561 6318
34 78 81 6084 6561 6318
35 78 81 6084 6561 6318
36 78 81 6084 6561 6318
37 78 79 6084 6241 6162
38 78 79 6084 6241 6162
248
39 78 75 6084 5625 5850

40 78 74 6084 5476 5772
41 77 74 5929 5476 5698
42 77 74 5929 5476 5698
43 77 74 5929 5476 5698
44 77 74 5929 5476 5698
45 77 74 5929 5476 5698
46 77 74 5929 5476 5698
47 77 67 5929 4489 5159
48 77 67 5929 4489 5159
49 76 67 5776 4489 5092
50 76 66 5776 4356 5016
51 76 66 5776 4356 5016
52 76 66 5776 4356 5016
53 76 66 5776 4356 5016
54 76 66 5776 4356 5016
55 76 66 5776 4356 5016
56 75 61 5625 3721 4575
57 75 61 5625 3721 4575
58 75 58 5625 3364 4350
59 75 58 5625 3364 4350
60 75 58 5625 3364 4350
61 74 58 5476 3364 4292
62 74 58 5476 3364 4292
63 74 58 5476 3364 4292
64 74 53 5476 2809 3922
65 74 51 5476 2601 3774
66 73 51 5329 2601 3723
67 73 51 5329 2601 3723
68 73 51 5329 2601 3723
69 73 51 5329 2601 3723
70 73 45 5329 2025 3285
71 73 45 5329 2025 3285
72 73 45 5329 2025 3285
73 73 45 5329 2025 3285
74 72 45 5184 2025 3240
75 72 45 5184 2025 3240
76 72 45 5184 2025 3240
77 72 45 5184 2025 3240
78 72 38 5184 1444 2736
79 72 37 5184 1369 2664
80 71 37 5041 1369 2627
81 71 37 5041 1369 2627
82 71 37 5041 1369 2627
83 71 37 5041 1369 2627
84 70 37 4900 1369 2590
85 70 37 4900 1369 2590
86 69 31 4761 961 2139
87 69 31 4761 961 2139
88 68 31 4624 961 2108
89 68 25 4624 625 1700
90 67 25 4489 625 1675
249
91 67 25 4489 625 1675

92 66 19 4356 361 1254
93 66 19 4356 361 1254
94 65 14 4225 196 910
Total 7130 6182 542632 454246 478044
Mean 75.85 65.77
Mean 75.85106383 65.76595745
Variance 19.50446122 512.6973233
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) two-tail 6.67001E-07
250
APPENDIX BBB - Correlation Between Family Relationship and

Nurturance Personality Preferences of the Generation Z of the
Nurturance
Family
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 95 97 9025 9409 9215

2 94 95 8836 9025 8930
3 94 94 8836 8836 8836
4 93 91 8649 8281 8463
5 92 91 8464 8281 8372
6 92 91 8464 8281 8372
7 90 91 8100 8281 8190
8 89 91 7921 8281 8099
9 89 90 7921 8100 8010
10 89 87 7921 7569 7743
11 88 87 7744 7569 7656
12 88 87 7744 7569 7656
13 88 87 7744 7569 7656
14 88 87 7744 7569 7656
15 88 86 7744 7396 7568
16 88 82 7744 6724 7216
17 88 82 7744 6724 7216
18 88 82 7744 6724 7216
19 88 82 7744 6724 7216
20 88 82 7744 6724 7216
21 87 74 7569 5476 6438
22 86 74 7396 5476 6364
23 86 74 7396 5476 6364
24 86 74 7396 5476 6364
25 86 74 7396 5476 6364
26 86 74 7396 5476 6364
27 85 70 7225 4900 5950
28 85 70 7225 4900 5950
29 85 70 7225 4900 5950
30 85 70 7225 4900 5950
31 85 70 7225 4900 5950
32 85 66 7225 4356 5610
33 85 66 7225 4356 5610
34 85 66 7225 4356 5610
35 85 66 7225 4356 5610
36 85 66 7225 4356 5610
37 85 66 7225 4356 5610
38 84 66 7056 4356 5544
251
39 84 66 7056 4356 5544

40 84 66 7056 4356 5544
41 84 66 7056 4356 5544
42 84 66 7056 4356 5544
43 84 63 7056 3969 5292
44 84 63 7056 3969 5292
45 84 63 7056 3969 5292
46 84 58 7056 3364 4872
47 84 58 7056 3364 4872
48 84 58 7056 3364 4872
49 83 58 6889 3364 4814
50 83 58 6889 3364 4814
51 83 55 6889 3025 4565
52 83 55 6889 3025 4565
53 82 55 6724 3025 4510
54 82 50 6724 2500 4100
55 82 50 6724 2500 4100
56 82 50 6724 2500 4100
57 81 46 6561 2116 3726
58 81 41 6561 1681 3321
59 81 41 6561 1681 3321
60 81 41 6561 1681 3321
61 81 41 6561 1681 3321
62 81 41 6561 1681 3321
63 81 41 6561 1681 3321
64 81 41 6561 1681 3321
65 81 41 6561 1681 3321
66 80 37 6400 1369 2960
67 80 37 6400 1369 2960
68 80 32 6400 1024 2560
69 80 32 6400 1024 2560
70 80 32 6400 1024 2560
71 80 31 6400 961 2480
72 80 31 6400 961 2480
73 80 26 6400 676 2080
74 79 26 6241 676 2054
75 79 26 6241 676 2054
76 78 26 6084 676 2028
77 78 26 6084 676 2028
78 78 26 6084 676 2028
79 77 24 5929 576 1848
80 77 24 5929 576 1848
81 77 20 5929 400 1540
82 77 20 5929 400 1540
83 77 20 5929 400 1540
84 76 20 5776 400 1520
85 76 18 5776 324 1368
86 76 14 5776 196 1064
87 76 14 5776 196 1064
88 75 14 5625 196 1050
89 75 9 5625 81 675
90 74 9 5476 81 666
252
91 72 6 5184 36 432
92 72 3 5184 9 216
93 72 2 5184 4 144
94 69 2 4761 4 138
Total 7792 5057 648440 337441 431729
Mean 82.89 53.80
Mean 82.89361702 53.79787234
Variance 27.2358728 703.066232
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 3.19797E-23
P(T<=t) two-tail 6.39593E-23
253
APPENDIX CCC - Correlation Between Peer Relationship and

Nurturance
Peer
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 93 97 8649 9409 9021

2 91 95 8281 9025 8645
3 89 94 7921 8836 8366
4 88 91 7744 8281 8008
5 88 91 7744 8281 8008
6 87 91 7569 8281 7917
7 87 91 7569 8281 7917
8 86 91 7396 8281 7826
9 86 90 7396 8100 7740
10 85 87 7225 7569 7395
11 85 87 7225 7569 7395
12 84 87 7056 7569 7308
13 84 87 7056 7569 7308
14 84 87 7056 7569 7308
15 84 86 7056 7396 7224
16 84 82 7056 6724 6888
17 84 82 7056 6724 6888
18 83 82 6889 6724 6806
19 83 82 6889 6724 6806
20 83 82 6889 6724 6806
21 83 74 6889 5476 6142
22 83 74 6889 5476 6142
23 82 74 6724 5476 6068
24 82 74 6724 5476 6068
25 82 74 6724 5476 6068
26 82 74 6724 5476 6068
27 82 70 6724 4900 5740
28 82 70 6724 4900 5740
29 82 70 6724 4900 5740
30 81 70 6561 4900 5670
31 81 70 6561 4900 5670
32 81 66 6561 4356 5346
33 81 66 6561 4356 5346
34 81 66 6561 4356 5346
35 80 66 6400 4356 5280
36 80 66 6400 4356 5280
37 80 66 6400 4356 5280
38 80 66 6400 4356 5280
254
39 80 66 6400 4356 5280

40 80 66 6400 4356 5280
41 80 66 6400 4356 5280
42 79 66 6241 4356 5214
43 79 63 6241 3969 4977
44 79 63 6241 3969 4977
45 79 63 6241 3969 4977
46 79 58 6241 3364 4582
47 79 58 6241 3364 4582
48 79 58 6241 3364 4582
49 79 58 6241 3364 4582
50 79 58 6241 3364 4582
51 79 55 6241 3025 4345
52 79 55 6241 3025 4345
53 79 55 6241 3025 4345
54 79 50 6241 2500 3950
55 78 50 6084 2500 3900
56 78 50 6084 2500 3900
57 78 46 6084 2116 3588
58 78 41 6084 1681 3198
59 78 41 6084 1681 3198
60 78 41 6084 1681 3198
61 78 41 6084 1681 3198
62 78 41 6084 1681 3198
63 77 41 5929 1681 3157
64 77 41 5929 1681 3157
65 77 41 5929 1681 3157
66 77 37 5929 1369 2849
67 77 37 5929 1369 2849
68 77 32 5929 1024 2464
69 77 32 5929 1024 2464
70 77 32 5929 1024 2464
71 77 31 5929 961 2387
72 77 31 5929 961 2387
73 76 26 5776 676 1976
74 76 26 5776 676 1976
75 76 26 5776 676 1976
76 75 26 5625 676 1950
77 75 26 5625 676 1950
78 74 26 5476 676 1924
79 74 24 5476 576 1776
80 74 24 5476 576 1776
81 74 20 5476 400 1480
82 74 20 5476 400 1480
83 74 20 5476 400 1480
84 73 20 5329 400 1460
85 72 18 5184 324 1296
86 72 14 5184 196 1008
87 72 14 5184 196 1008
88 72 14 5184 196 1008
89 71 9 5041 81 639
90 71 9 5041 81 639
255
91 69 6 4761 36 414
92 67 3 4489 9 201
93 67 2 4489 4 134
94 64 2 4096 4 128
Total 7436 5057 590684 337441 412126
Mean 79.11 53.80
Mean 79.10638298 53.79787234
Variance 26.33264699 703.066232
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 1.69457E-19
P(T<=t) two-tail 3.38914E-19
256
APPENDIX DDD - Correlation Between Academics and Nurturance

Nurturance
Preference
1 91 97 8281 9409 8827

2 91 95 8281 9025 8645
3 90 94 8100 8836 8460
4 89 91 7921 8281 8099
5 88 91 7744 8281 8008
6 88 91 7744 8281 8008
7 88 91 7744 8281 8008
8 88 91 7744 8281 8008
9 88 90 7744 8100 7920
10 87 87 7569 7569 7569
11 87 87 7569 7569 7569
12 87 87 7569 7569 7569
13 86 87 7396 7569 7482
14 86 87 7396 7569 7482
15 86 86 7396 7396 7396
16 86 82 7396 6724 7052
17 86 82 7396 6724 7052
18 85 82 7225 6724 6970
19 84 82 7056 6724 6888
20 84 82 7056 6724 6888
21 84 74 7056 5476 6216
22 84 74 7056 5476 6216
23 84 74 7056 5476 6216
24 84 74 7056 5476 6216
25 84 74 7056 5476 6216
26 84 74 7056 5476 6216
27 84 70 7056 4900 5880
28 84 70 7056 4900 5880
29 83 70 6889 4900 5810
30 83 70 6889 4900 5810
31 83 70 6889 4900 5810
32 83 66 6889 4356 5478
33 83 66 6889 4356 5478
34 83 66 6889 4356 5478
35 82 66 6724 4356 5412
36 82 66 6724 4356 5412
37 82 66 6724 4356 5412
38 82 66 6724 4356 5412
257
39 82 66 6724 4356 5412

40 82 66 6724 4356 5412
41 82 66 6724 4356 5412
42 82 66 6724 4356 5412
43 82 63 6724 3969 5166
44 81 63 6561 3969 5103
45 81 63 6561 3969 5103
46 81 58 6561 3364 4698
47 81 58 6561 3364 4698
48 81 58 6561 3364 4698
49 81 58 6561 3364 4698
50 80 58 6400 3364 4640
51 80 55 6400 3025 4400
52 80 55 6400 3025 4400
53 80 55 6400 3025 4400
54 80 50 6400 2500 4000
55 80 50 6400 2500 4000
56 80 50 6400 2500 4000
57 80 46 6400 2116 3680
58 79 41 6241 1681 3239
59 79 41 6241 1681 3239
60 79 41 6241 1681 3239
61 79 41 6241 1681 3239
62 79 41 6241 1681 3239
63 79 41 6241 1681 3239
64 79 41 6241 1681 3239
65 79 41 6241 1681 3239
66 78 37 6084 1369 2886
67 78 37 6084 1369 2886
68 78 32 6084 1024 2496
69 78 32 6084 1024 2496
70 77 32 5929 1024 2464
71 77 31 5929 961 2387
72 77 31 5929 961 2387
73 77 26 5929 676 2002
74 77 26 5929 676 2002
75 77 26 5929 676 2002
76 77 26 5929 676 2002
77 76 26 5776 676 1976
78 75 26 5625 676 1950
79 75 24 5625 576 1800
80 75 24 5625 576 1800
81 75 20 5625 400 1500
82 74 20 5476 400 1480
83 74 20 5476 400 1480
84 74 20 5476 400 1480
85 74 18 5476 324 1332
86 73 14 5329 196 1022
87 73 14 5329 196 1022
88 73 14 5329 196 1022
89 72 9 5184 81 648
90 72 9 5184 81 648
258
91 71 6 5041 36 426
92 71 3 5041 9 213
93 70 2 4900 4 140
94 68 2 4624 4 136
Total 7577 5057 613099 337441 419797
Mean 80.61 53.80
Mean 80.60638298 53.79787234
Variance 25.20899108 703.066232
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 5.76215E-21
P(T<=t) two-tail 1.15243E-20
259
APPENDIX EEE - Correlation Between Social Networking and

Nurturance
Social
Personality
Networking
Preference
1 85 97 7225 9409 8245

2 85 95 7225 9025 8075
3 83 94 6889 8836 7802
4 83 91 6889 8281 7553
5 83 91 6889 8281 7553
6 82 91 6724 8281 7462
7 82 91 6724 8281 7462
8 82 91 6724 8281 7462
9 82 90 6724 8100 7380
10 81 87 6561 7569 7047
11 80 87 6400 7569 6960
12 80 87 6400 7569 6960
13 80 87 6400 7569 6960
14 80 87 6400 7569 6960
15 80 86 6400 7396 6880
16 80 82 6400 6724 6560
17 80 82 6400 6724 6560
18 80 82 6400 6724 6560
19 79 82 6241 6724 6478
20 79 82 6241 6724 6478
21 79 74 6241 5476 5846
22 79 74 6241 5476 5846
23 79 74 6241 5476 5846
24 79 74 6241 5476 5846
25 79 74 6241 5476 5846
26 79 74 6241 5476 5846
27 78 70 6084 4900 5460
28 78 70 6084 4900 5460
29 78 70 6084 4900 5460
30 78 70 6084 4900 5460
31 78 70 6084 4900 5460
32 78 66 6084 4356 5148
33 78 66 6084 4356 5148
34 78 66 6084 4356 5148
35 78 66 6084 4356 5148
36 78 66 6084 4356 5148
37 78 66 6084 4356 5148
38 78 66 6084 4356 5148
260
39 78 66 6084 4356 5148

40 78 66 6084 4356 5148
41 77 66 5929 4356 5082
42 77 66 5929 4356 5082
43 77 63 5929 3969 4851
44 77 63 5929 3969 4851
45 77 63 5929 3969 4851
46 77 58 5929 3364 4466
47 77 58 5929 3364 4466
48 77 58 5929 3364 4466
49 76 58 5776 3364 4408
50 76 58 5776 3364 4408
51 76 55 5776 3025 4180
52 76 55 5776 3025 4180
53 76 55 5776 3025 4180
54 76 50 5776 2500 3800
55 76 50 5776 2500 3800
56 75 50 5625 2500 3750
57 75 46 5625 2116 3450
58 75 41 5625 1681 3075
59 75 41 5625 1681 3075
60 75 41 5625 1681 3075
61 74 41 5476 1681 3034
62 74 41 5476 1681 3034
63 74 41 5476 1681 3034
64 74 41 5476 1681 3034
65 74 41 5476 1681 3034
66 73 37 5329 1369 2701
67 73 37 5329 1369 2701
68 73 32 5329 1024 2336
69 73 32 5329 1024 2336
70 73 32 5329 1024 2336
71 73 31 5329 961 2263
72 73 31 5329 961 2263
73 73 26 5329 676 1898
74 72 26 5184 676 1872
75 72 26 5184 676 1872
76 72 26 5184 676 1872
77 72 26 5184 676 1872
78 72 26 5184 676 1872
79 72 24 5184 576 1728
80 71 24 5041 576 1704
81 71 20 5041 400 1420
82 71 20 5041 400 1420
83 71 20 5041 400 1420
84 70 20 4900 400 1400
85 70 18 4900 324 1260
86 69 14 4761 196 966
87 69 14 4761 196 966
88 68 14 4624 196 952
89 68 9 4624 81 612
90 67 9 4489 81 603
261
91 67 6 4489 36 402
92 66 3 4356 9 198
93 66 2 4356 4 132
94 65 2 4225 4 130
Total 7130 5057 542632 337441 394278
Mean 75.85 53.80
Mean 75.85106383 53.79787234
Variance 19.50446122 703.066232
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 6.06017E-16
P(T<=t) two-tail 1.21203E-15
262
APPENDIX FFF - Correlation Between Family Relationship and

Change Personality Preferences of the Generation Z of the College of
the Holy Spirit of Tarlac
Change
Family
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 95 99 9025 9801 9405

2 94 99 8836 9801 9306
3 94 99 8836 9801 9306
4 93 99 8649 9801 9207
5 92 98 8464 9604 9016
6 92 96 8464 9216 8832
7 90 96 8100 9216 8640
8 89 96 7921 9216 8544
9 89 94 7921 8836 8366
10 89 94 7921 8836 8366
11 88 94 7744 8836 8272
12 88 94 7744 8836 8272
13 88 94 7744 8836 8272
14 88 93 7744 8649 8184
15 88 90 7744 8100 7920
16 88 90 7744 8100 7920
17 88 89 7744 7921 7832
18 88 89 7744 7921 7832
19 88 85 7744 7225 7480
20 88 85 7744 7225 7480
21 87 81 7569 6561 7047
22 86 81 7396 6561 6966
23 86 81 7396 6561 6966
24 86 81 7396 6561 6966
25 86 81 7396 6561 6966
26 86 78 7396 6084 6708
27 85 73 7225 5329 6205
28 85 73 7225 5329 6205
29 85 73 7225 5329 6205
30 85 73 7225 5329 6205
31 85 73 7225 5329 6205
32 85 73 7225 5329 6205
33 85 73 7225 5329 6205
34 85 73 7225 5329 6205
35 85 73 7225 5329 6205
36 85 71 7225 5041 6035
37 85 71 7225 5041 6035
38 84 71 7056 5041 5964
263
39 84 71 7056 5041 5964

40 84 71 7056 5041 5964
41 84 71 7056 5041 5964
42 84 68 7056 4624 5712
43 84 68 7056 4624 5712
44 84 68 7056 4624 5712
45 84 68 7056 4624 5712
46 84 68 7056 4624 5712
47 84 59 7056 3481 4956
48 84 59 7056 3481 4956
49 83 59 6889 3481 4897
50 83 59 6889 3481 4897
51 83 57 6889 3249 4731
52 83 57 6889 3249 4731
53 82 57 6724 3249 4674
54 82 57 6724 3249 4674
55 82 57 6724 3249 4674
56 82 52 6724 2704 4264
57 81 52 6561 2704 4212
58 81 52 6561 2704 4212
59 81 52 6561 2704 4212
60 81 52 6561 2704 4212
61 81 52 6561 2704 4212
62 81 50 6561 2500 4050
63 81 42 6561 1764 3402
64 81 42 6561 1764 3402
65 81 42 6561 1764 3402
66 80 42 6400 1764 3360
67 80 42 6400 1764 3360
68 80 42 6400 1764 3360
69 80 35 6400 1225 2800
70 80 35 6400 1225 2800
71 80 35 6400 1225 2800
72 80 35 6400 1225 2800
73 80 35 6400 1225 2800
74 79 35 6241 1225 2765
75 79 35 6241 1225 2765
76 78 28 6084 784 2184
77 78 28 6084 784 2184
78 78 28 6084 784 2184
79 77 28 5929 784 2156
80 77 21 5929 441 1617
81 77 21 5929 441 1617
82 77 21 5929 441 1617
83 77 20 5929 400 1540
84 76 17 5776 289 1292
85 76 17 5776 289 1292
86 76 17 5776 289 1292
87 76 17 5776 289 1292
88 75 13 5625 169 975
89 75 13 5625 169 975
90 74 10 5476 100 740
264
91 72 7 5184 49 504
92 72 7 5184 49 504
93 72 7 5184 49 504
94 69 7 4761 49 483
Total 7792 5486 648440 390694 467734
Mean 82.89 58.36
Mean 82.89361702 58.36170213
Variance 27.2358728 758.2978723
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) two-tail 1.29044E-17
265
APPENDIX GGG - Correlation Between Peer Relationship and Change

Change
Peer
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 93 99 8649 9801 9207

2 91 99 8281 9801 9009
3 89 99 7921 9801 8811
4 88 99 7744 9801 8712
5 88 98 7744 9604 8624
6 87 96 7569 9216 8352
7 87 96 7569 9216 8352
8 86 96 7396 9216 8256
9 86 94 7396 8836 8084
10 85 94 7225 8836 7990
11 85 94 7225 8836 7990
12 84 94 7056 8836 7896
13 84 94 7056 8836 7896
14 84 93 7056 8649 7812
15 84 90 7056 8100 7560
16 84 90 7056 8100 7560
17 84 89 7056 7921 7476
18 83 89 6889 7921 7387
19 83 85 6889 7225 7055
20 83 85 6889 7225 7055
21 83 81 6889 6561 6723
22 83 81 6889 6561 6723
23 82 81 6724 6561 6642
24 82 81 6724 6561 6642
25 82 81 6724 6561 6642
26 82 78 6724 6084 6396
27 82 73 6724 5329 5986
28 82 73 6724 5329 5986
29 82 73 6724 5329 5986
30 81 73 6561 5329 5913
31 81 73 6561 5329 5913
32 81 73 6561 5329 5913
33 81 73 6561 5329 5913
34 81 73 6561 5329 5913
35 80 73 6400 5329 5840
36 80 71 6400 5041 5680
37 80 71 6400 5041 5680
38 80 71 6400 5041 5680
266
39 80 71 6400 5041 5680

40 80 71 6400 5041 5680
41 80 71 6400 5041 5680
42 79 68 6241 4624 5372
43 79 68 6241 4624 5372
44 79 68 6241 4624 5372
45 79 68 6241 4624 5372
46 79 68 6241 4624 5372
47 79 59 6241 3481 4661
48 79 59 6241 3481 4661
49 79 59 6241 3481 4661
50 79 59 6241 3481 4661
51 79 57 6241 3249 4503
52 79 57 6241 3249 4503
53 79 57 6241 3249 4503
54 79 57 6241 3249 4503
55 78 57 6084 3249 4446
56 78 52 6084 2704 4056
57 78 52 6084 2704 4056
58 78 52 6084 2704 4056
59 78 52 6084 2704 4056
60 78 52 6084 2704 4056
61 78 52 6084 2704 4056
62 78 50 6084 2500 3900
63 77 42 5929 1764 3234
64 77 42 5929 1764 3234
65 77 42 5929 1764 3234
66 77 42 5929 1764 3234
67 77 42 5929 1764 3234
68 77 42 5929 1764 3234
69 77 35 5929 1225 2695
70 77 35 5929 1225 2695
71 77 35 5929 1225 2695
72 77 35 5929 1225 2695
73 76 35 5776 1225 2660
74 76 35 5776 1225 2660
75 76 35 5776 1225 2660
76 75 28 5625 784 2100
77 75 28 5625 784 2100
78 74 28 5476 784 2072
79 74 28 5476 784 2072
80 74 21 5476 441 1554
81 74 21 5476 441 1554
82 74 21 5476 441 1554
83 74 20 5476 400 1480
84 73 17 5329 289 1241
85 72 17 5184 289 1224
86 72 17 5184 289 1224
87 72 17 5184 289 1224
88 72 13 5184 169 936
89 71 13 5041 169 923
90 71 10 5041 100 710
267
91 69 7 4761 49 483
92 67 7 4489 49 469
93 67 7 4489 49 469
94 64 7 4096 49 448
Total 7436 5486 590684 390694 446494
Mean 79.11 58.36
Mean 79.10638298 58.36170213
Variance 26.33264699 758.2978723
Observations 94 94
df 93
268
APPENDIX HHH - Correlation Between Academics and Change

Change
Preference
1 91 99 8281 9801 9009

2 91 99 8281 9801 9009
3 90 99 8100 9801 8910
4 89 99 7921 9801 8811
5 88 98 7744 9604 8624
6 88 96 7744 9216 8448
7 88 96 7744 9216 8448
8 88 96 7744 9216 8448
9 88 94 7744 8836 8272
10 87 94 7569 8836 8178
11 87 94 7569 8836 8178
12 87 94 7569 8836 8178
13 86 94 7396 8836 8084
14 86 93 7396 8649 7998
15 86 90 7396 8100 7740
16 86 90 7396 8100 7740
17 86 89 7396 7921 7654
18 85 89 7225 7921 7565
19 84 85 7056 7225 7140
20 84 85 7056 7225 7140
21 84 81 7056 6561 6804
22 84 81 7056 6561 6804
23 84 81 7056 6561 6804
24 84 81 7056 6561 6804
25 84 81 7056 6561 6804
26 84 78 7056 6084 6552
27 84 73 7056 5329 6132
28 84 73 7056 5329 6132
29 83 73 6889 5329 6059
30 83 73 6889 5329 6059
31 83 73 6889 5329 6059
32 83 73 6889 5329 6059
33 83 73 6889 5329 6059
34 83 73 6889 5329 6059
35 82 73 6724 5329 5986
36 82 71 6724 5041 5822
37 82 71 6724 5041 5822
38 82 71 6724 5041 5822
269
39 82 71 6724 5041 5822

40 82 71 6724 5041 5822
41 82 71 6724 5041 5822
42 82 68 6724 4624 5576
43 82 68 6724 4624 5576
44 81 68 6561 4624 5508
45 81 68 6561 4624 5508
46 81 68 6561 4624 5508
47 81 59 6561 3481 4779
48 81 59 6561 3481 4779
49 81 59 6561 3481 4779
50 80 59 6400 3481 4720
51 80 57 6400 3249 4560
52 80 57 6400 3249 4560
53 80 57 6400 3249 4560
54 80 57 6400 3249 4560
55 80 57 6400 3249 4560
56 80 52 6400 2704 4160
57 80 52 6400 2704 4160
58 79 52 6241 2704 4108
59 79 52 6241 2704 4108
60 79 52 6241 2704 4108
61 79 52 6241 2704 4108
62 79 50 6241 2500 3950
63 79 42 6241 1764 3318
64 79 42 6241 1764 3318
65 79 42 6241 1764 3318
66 78 42 6084 1764 3276
67 78 42 6084 1764 3276
68 78 42 6084 1764 3276
69 78 35 6084 1225 2730
70 77 35 5929 1225 2695
71 77 35 5929 1225 2695
72 77 35 5929 1225 2695
73 77 35 5929 1225 2695
74 77 35 5929 1225 2695
75 77 35 5929 1225 2695
76 77 28 5929 784 2156
77 76 28 5776 784 2128
78 75 28 5625 784 2100
79 75 28 5625 784 2100
80 75 21 5625 441 1575
81 75 21 5625 441 1575
82 74 21 5476 441 1554
83 74 20 5476 400 1480
84 74 17 5476 289 1258
85 74 17 5476 289 1258
86 73 17 5329 289 1241
87 73 17 5329 289 1241
88 73 13 5329 169 949
89 72 13 5184 169 936
90 72 10 5184 100 720
270
91 71 7 5041 49 497
92 71 7 5041 49 497
93 70 7 4900 49 490
94 68 7 4624 49 476
Total 7577 5486 613099 390694 454830
Mean 80.61 58.36
Mean 80.60638298 58.36170213
Variance 25.20899108 758.2978723
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 1.00453E-15
P(T<=t) two-tail 2.00905E-15
271
APPENDIX III - Correlation Between Social Networking and Change

Change
Social
Personality
Networking
Preference
1 85 99 7225 9801 8415

2 85 99 7225 9801 8415
3 83 99 6889 9801 8217
4 83 99 6889 9801 8217
5 83 98 6889 9604 8134
6 82 96 6724 9216 7872
7 82 96 6724 9216 7872
8 82 96 6724 9216 7872
9 82 94 6724 8836 7708
10 81 94 6561 8836 7614
11 80 94 6400 8836 7520
12 80 94 6400 8836 7520
13 80 94 6400 8836 7520
14 80 93 6400 8649 7440
15 80 90 6400 8100 7200
16 80 90 6400 8100 7200
17 80 89 6400 7921 7120
18 80 89 6400 7921 7120
19 79 85 6241 7225 6715
20 79 85 6241 7225 6715
21 79 81 6241 6561 6399
22 79 81 6241 6561 6399
23 79 81 6241 6561 6399
24 79 81 6241 6561 6399
25 79 81 6241 6561 6399
26 79 78 6241 6084 6162
27 78 73 6084 5329 5694
28 78 73 6084 5329 5694
29 78 73 6084 5329 5694
30 78 73 6084 5329 5694
31 78 73 6084 5329 5694
32 78 73 6084 5329 5694
33 78 73 6084 5329 5694
34 78 73 6084 5329 5694
35 78 73 6084 5329 5694
36 78 71 6084 5041 5538
37 78 71 6084 5041 5538
38 78 71 6084 5041 5538
272
39 78 71 6084 5041 5538

40 78 71 6084 5041 5538
41 77 71 5929 5041 5467
42 77 68 5929 4624 5236
43 77 68 5929 4624 5236
44 77 68 5929 4624 5236
45 77 68 5929 4624 5236
46 77 68 5929 4624 5236
47 77 59 5929 3481 4543
48 77 59 5929 3481 4543
49 76 59 5776 3481 4484
50 76 59 5776 3481 4484
51 76 57 5776 3249 4332
52 76 57 5776 3249 4332
53 76 57 5776 3249 4332
54 76 57 5776 3249 4332
55 76 57 5776 3249 4332
56 75 52 5625 2704 3900
57 75 52 5625 2704 3900
58 75 52 5625 2704 3900
59 75 52 5625 2704 3900
60 75 52 5625 2704 3900
61 74 52 5476 2704 3848
62 74 50 5476 2500 3700
63 74 42 5476 1764 3108
64 74 42 5476 1764 3108
65 74 42 5476 1764 3108
66 73 42 5329 1764 3066
67 73 42 5329 1764 3066
68 73 42 5329 1764 3066
69 73 35 5329 1225 2555
70 73 35 5329 1225 2555
71 73 35 5329 1225 2555
72 73 35 5329 1225 2555
73 73 35 5329 1225 2555
74 72 35 5184 1225 2520
75 72 35 5184 1225 2520
76 72 28 5184 784 2016
77 72 28 5184 784 2016
78 72 28 5184 784 2016
79 72 28 5184 784 2016
80 71 21 5041 441 1491
81 71 21 5041 441 1491
82 71 21 5041 441 1491
83 71 20 5041 400 1420
84 70 17 4900 289 1190
85 70 17 4900 289 1190
86 69 17 4761 289 1173
87 69 17 4761 289 1173
88 68 13 4624 169 884
89 68 13 4624 169 884
90 67 10 4489 100 670
273
91 67 7 4489 49 469
92 66 7 4356 49 462
93 66 7 4356 49 462
94 65 7 4225 49 455
Total 7130 5486 542632 390694 427214
Mean 75.85 58.36
Mean 75.85106383 58.36170213
Variance 19.50446122 758.2978723
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 4.72352E-11
P(T<=t) two-tail 9.44705E-11
274
APPENDIX JJJ - Correlation Between Family Relationship and

Endurance Personality Preferences of the Generation Z of the College
Endurance
Family
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 95 99 9025 9801 9405

2 94 99 8836 9801 9306
3 94 98 8836 9604 9212
4 93 95 8649 9025 8835
5 92 95 8464 9025 8740
6 92 95 8464 9025 8740
7 90 90 8100 8100 8100
8 89 90 7921 8100 8010
9 89 90 7921 8100 8010
10 89 85 7921 7225 7565
11 88 85 7744 7225 7480
12 88 85 7744 7225 7480
13 88 85 7744 7225 7480
14 88 80 7744 6400 7040
15 88 80 7744 6400 7040
16 88 80 7744 6400 7040
17 88 80 7744 6400 7040
18 88 80 7744 6400 7040
19 88 80 7744 6400 7040
20 88 80 7744 6400 7040
21 87 79 7569 6241 6873
22 86 76 7396 5776 6536
23 86 76 7396 5776 6536
24 86 76 7396 5776 6536
25 86 76 7396 5776 6536
26 86 76 7396 5776 6536
27 85 76 7225 5776 6460
28 85 75 7225 5625 6375
29 85 69 7225 4761 5865
30 85 69 7225 4761 5865
31 85 69 7225 4761 5865
32 85 69 7225 4761 5865
33 85 69 7225 4761 5865
34 85 69 7225 4761 5865
35 85 69 7225 4761 5865
36 85 69 7225 4761 5865
37 85 69 7225 4761 5865
38 84 69 7056 4761 5796
275
39 84 69 7056 4761 5796

40 84 69 7056 4761 5796
41 84 64 7056 4096 5376
42 84 64 7056 4096 5376
43 84 64 7056 4096 5376
44 84 64 7056 4096 5376
45 84 64 7056 4096 5376
46 84 63 7056 3969 5292
47 84 63 7056 3969 5292
48 84 63 7056 3969 5292
49 83 63 6889 3969 5229
50 83 63 6889 3969 5229
51 83 63 6889 3969 5229
52 83 63 6889 3969 5229
53 82 63 6724 3969 5166
54 82 63 6724 3969 5166
55 82 57 6724 3249 4674
56 82 57 6724 3249 4674
57 81 57 6561 3249 4617
58 81 57 6561 3249 4617
59 81 57 6561 3249 4617
60 81 57 6561 3249 4617
61 81 57 6561 3249 4617
62 81 50 6561 2500 4050
63 81 50 6561 2500 4050
64 81 50 6561 2500 4050
65 81 50 6561 2500 4050
66 80 44 6400 1936 3520
67 80 44 6400 1936 3520
68 80 44 6400 1936 3520
69 80 44 6400 1936 3520
70 80 44 6400 1936 3520
71 80 44 6400 1936 3520
72 80 44 6400 1936 3520
73 80 44 6400 1936 3520
74 79 44 6241 1936 3476
75 79 44 6241 1936 3476
76 78 44 6084 1936 3432
77 78 44 6084 1936 3432
78 78 44 6084 1936 3432
79 77 44 5929 1936 3388
80 77 44 5929 1936 3388
81 77 36 5929 1296 2772
82 77 36 5929 1296 2772
83 77 36 5929 1296 2772
84 76 30 5776 900 2280
85 76 30 5776 900 2280
86 76 30 5776 900 2280
87 76 29 5776 841 2204
88 75 24 5625 576 1800
89 75 24 5625 576 1800
90 74 18 5476 324 1332
276
91 72 18 5184 324 1296

92 72 13 5184 169 936
93 72 9 5184 81 648
94 69 5 4761 25 345
Total 7792 5673 648440 385423 480542
Mean 82.89 60.35
Mean 82.89361702 60.35106383
Variance 27.2358728 462.9184397
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 1.36349E-23
P(T<=t) two-tail 2.72698E-23
277
APPENDIX KKK - Correlation Between Peer Relationship and

Endurance
Peer
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 93 99 8649 9801 9207

2 91 99 8281 9801 9009
3 89 98 7921 9604 8722
4 88 95 7744 9025 8360
5 88 95 7744 9025 8360
6 87 95 7569 9025 8265
7 87 90 7569 8100 7830
8 86 90 7396 8100 7740
9 86 90 7396 8100 7740
10 85 85 7225 7225 7225
11 85 85 7225 7225 7225
12 84 85 7056 7225 7140
13 84 85 7056 7225 7140
14 84 80 7056 6400 6720
15 84 80 7056 6400 6720
16 84 80 7056 6400 6720
17 84 80 7056 6400 6720
18 83 80 6889 6400 6640
19 83 80 6889 6400 6640
20 83 80 6889 6400 6640
21 83 79 6889 6241 6557
22 83 76 6889 5776 6308
23 82 76 6724 5776 6232
24 82 76 6724 5776 6232
25 82 76 6724 5776 6232
26 82 76 6724 5776 6232
27 82 76 6724 5776 6232
28 82 75 6724 5625 6150
29 82 69 6724 4761 5658
30 81 69 6561 4761 5589
31 81 69 6561 4761 5589
32 81 69 6561 4761 5589
33 81 69 6561 4761 5589
34 81 69 6561 4761 5589
35 80 69 6400 4761 5520
36 80 69 6400 4761 5520
37 80 69 6400 4761 5520
38 80 69 6400 4761 5520
278
39 80 69 6400 4761 5520

40 80 69 6400 4761 5520
41 80 64 6400 4096 5120
42 79 64 6241 4096 5056
43 79 64 6241 4096 5056
44 79 64 6241 4096 5056
45 79 64 6241 4096 5056
46 79 63 6241 3969 4977
47 79 63 6241 3969 4977
48 79 63 6241 3969 4977
49 79 63 6241 3969 4977
50 79 63 6241 3969 4977
51 79 63 6241 3969 4977
52 79 63 6241 3969 4977
53 79 63 6241 3969 4977
54 79 63 6241 3969 4977
55 78 57 6084 3249 4446
56 78 57 6084 3249 4446
57 78 57 6084 3249 4446
58 78 57 6084 3249 4446
59 78 57 6084 3249 4446
60 78 57 6084 3249 4446
61 78 57 6084 3249 4446
62 78 50 6084 2500 3900
63 77 50 5929 2500 3850
64 77 50 5929 2500 3850
65 77 50 5929 2500 3850
66 77 44 5929 1936 3388
67 77 44 5929 1936 3388
68 77 44 5929 1936 3388
69 77 44 5929 1936 3388
70 77 44 5929 1936 3388
71 77 44 5929 1936 3388
72 77 44 5929 1936 3388
73 76 44 5776 1936 3344
74 76 44 5776 1936 3344
75 76 44 5776 1936 3344
76 75 44 5625 1936 3300
77 75 44 5625 1936 3300
78 74 44 5476 1936 3256
79 74 44 5476 1936 3256
80 74 44 5476 1936 3256
81 74 36 5476 1296 2664
82 74 36 5476 1296 2664
83 74 36 5476 1296 2664
84 73 30 5329 900 2190
85 72 30 5184 900 2160
86 72 30 5184 900 2160
87 72 29 5184 841 2088
88 72 24 5184 576 1728
89 71 24 5041 576 1704
90 71 18 5041 324 1278
279
91 69 18 4761 324 1242

92 67 13 4489 169 871
93 67 9 4489 81 603
94 64 5 4096 25 320
Total 7436 5673 590684 385423 458822
Mean 79.11 60.35
Mean 79.10638298 60.35106383
Variance 26.33264699 462.9184397
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 7.91619E-19
P(T<=t) two-tail 1.58324E-18
280
APPENDIX LLL - Correlation Between Academics and Endurance

Endurance
Preference
1 91 99 8281 9801 9009

2 91 99 8281 9801 9009
3 90 98 8100 9604 8820
4 89 95 7921 9025 8455
5 88 95 7744 9025 8360
6 88 95 7744 9025 8360
7 88 90 7744 8100 7920
8 88 90 7744 8100 7920
9 88 90 7744 8100 7920
10 87 85 7569 7225 7395
11 87 85 7569 7225 7395
12 87 85 7569 7225 7395
13 86 85 7396 7225 7310
14 86 80 7396 6400 6880
15 86 80 7396 6400 6880
16 86 80 7396 6400 6880
17 86 80 7396 6400 6880
18 85 80 7225 6400 6800
19 84 80 7056 6400 6720
20 84 80 7056 6400 6720
21 84 79 7056 6241 6636
22 84 76 7056 5776 6384
23 84 76 7056 5776 6384
24 84 76 7056 5776 6384
25 84 76 7056 5776 6384
26 84 76 7056 5776 6384
27 84 76 7056 5776 6384
28 84 75 7056 5625 6300
29 83 69 6889 4761 5727
30 83 69 6889 4761 5727
31 83 69 6889 4761 5727
32 83 69 6889 4761 5727
33 83 69 6889 4761 5727
34 83 69 6889 4761 5727
35 82 69 6724 4761 5658
36 82 69 6724 4761 5658
37 82 69 6724 4761 5658
38 82 69 6724 4761 5658
281
39 82 69 6724 4761 5658

40 82 69 6724 4761 5658
41 82 64 6724 4096 5248
42 82 64 6724 4096 5248
43 82 64 6724 4096 5248
44 81 64 6561 4096 5184
45 81 64 6561 4096 5184
46 81 63 6561 3969 5103
47 81 63 6561 3969 5103
48 81 63 6561 3969 5103
49 81 63 6561 3969 5103
50 80 63 6400 3969 5040
51 80 63 6400 3969 5040
52 80 63 6400 3969 5040
53 80 63 6400 3969 5040
54 80 63 6400 3969 5040
55 80 57 6400 3249 4560
56 80 57 6400 3249 4560
57 80 57 6400 3249 4560
58 79 57 6241 3249 4503
59 79 57 6241 3249 4503
60 79 57 6241 3249 4503
61 79 57 6241 3249 4503
62 79 50 6241 2500 3950
63 79 50 6241 2500 3950
64 79 50 6241 2500 3950
65 79 50 6241 2500 3950
66 78 44 6084 1936 3432
67 78 44 6084 1936 3432
68 78 44 6084 1936 3432
69 78 44 6084 1936 3432
70 77 44 5929 1936 3388
71 77 44 5929 1936 3388
72 77 44 5929 1936 3388
73 77 44 5929 1936 3388
74 77 44 5929 1936 3388
75 77 44 5929 1936 3388
76 77 44 5929 1936 3388
77 76 44 5776 1936 3344
78 75 44 5625 1936 3300
79 75 44 5625 1936 3300
80 75 44 5625 1936 3300
81 75 36 5625 1296 2700
82 74 36 5476 1296 2664
83 74 36 5476 1296 2664
84 74 30 5476 900 2220
85 74 30 5476 900 2220
86 73 30 5329 900 2190
87 73 29 5329 841 2117
88 73 24 5329 576 1752
89 72 24 5184 576 1728
90 72 18 5184 324 1296
282
91 71 18 5041 324 1278

92 71 13 5041 169 923
93 70 9 4900 81 630
94 68 5 4624 25 340
Total 7577 5673 613099 385423 467204
Mean 80.61 60.35
Mean 80.60638298 60.35106383
Variance 25.20899108 462.9184397
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 1.38542E-20
P(T<=t) two-tail 2.77085E-20
283
APPENDIX MMM - Correlation Between Social Networking and

Endurance
Social
Personality
Networking
Preference
1 85 99 7225 9801 8415

2 85 99 7225 9801 8415
3 83 98 6889 9604 8134
4 83 95 6889 9025 7885
5 83 95 6889 9025 7885
6 82 95 6724 9025 7790
7 82 90 6724 8100 7380
8 82 90 6724 8100 7380
9 82 90 6724 8100 7380
10 81 85 6561 7225 6885
11 80 85 6400 7225 6800
12 80 85 6400 7225 6800
13 80 85 6400 7225 6800
14 80 80 6400 6400 6400
15 80 80 6400 6400 6400
16 80 80 6400 6400 6400
17 80 80 6400 6400 6400
18 80 80 6400 6400 6400
19 79 80 6241 6400 6320
20 79 80 6241 6400 6320
21 79 79 6241 6241 6241
22 79 76 6241 5776 6004
23 79 76 6241 5776 6004
24 79 76 6241 5776 6004
25 79 76 6241 5776 6004
26 79 76 6241 5776 6004
27 78 76 6084 5776 5928
28 78 75 6084 5625 5850
29 78 69 6084 4761 5382
30 78 69 6084 4761 5382
31 78 69 6084 4761 5382
32 78 69 6084 4761 5382
33 78 69 6084 4761 5382
34 78 69 6084 4761 5382
35 78 69 6084 4761 5382
36 78 69 6084 4761 5382
37 78 69 6084 4761 5382
38 78 69 6084 4761 5382
284
39 78 69 6084 4761 5382

40 78 69 6084 4761 5382
41 77 64 5929 4096 4928
42 77 64 5929 4096 4928
43 77 64 5929 4096 4928
44 77 64 5929 4096 4928
45 77 64 5929 4096 4928
46 77 63 5929 3969 4851
47 77 63 5929 3969 4851
48 77 63 5929 3969 4851
49 76 63 5776 3969 4788
50 76 63 5776 3969 4788
51 76 63 5776 3969 4788
52 76 63 5776 3969 4788
53 76 63 5776 3969 4788
54 76 63 5776 3969 4788
55 76 57 5776 3249 4332
56 75 57 5625 3249 4275
57 75 57 5625 3249 4275
58 75 57 5625 3249 4275
59 75 57 5625 3249 4275
60 75 57 5625 3249 4275
61 74 57 5476 3249 4218
62 74 50 5476 2500 3700
63 74 50 5476 2500 3700
64 74 50 5476 2500 3700
65 74 50 5476 2500 3700
66 73 44 5329 1936 3212
67 73 44 5329 1936 3212
68 73 44 5329 1936 3212
69 73 44 5329 1936 3212
70 73 44 5329 1936 3212
71 73 44 5329 1936 3212
72 73 44 5329 1936 3212
73 73 44 5329 1936 3212
74 72 44 5184 1936 3168
75 72 44 5184 1936 3168
76 72 44 5184 1936 3168
77 72 44 5184 1936 3168
78 72 44 5184 1936 3168
79 72 44 5184 1936 3168
80 71 44 5041 1936 3124
81 71 36 5041 1296 2556
82 71 36 5041 1296 2556
83 71 36 5041 1296 2556
84 70 30 4900 900 2100
85 70 30 4900 900 2100
86 69 30 4761 900 2070
87 69 29 4761 841 2001
88 68 24 4624 576 1632
89 68 24 4624 576 1632
90 67 18 4489 324 1206
285
91 67 18 4489 324 1206

92 66 13 4356 169 858
93 66 9 4356 81 594
94 65 5 4225 25 325
Total 7130 5673 542632 385423 439078
Mean 75.85 60.35
Mean 75.85106383 60.35106383
Variance 19.50446122 462.9184397
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 4.11187E-14
P(T<=t) two-tail 8.22374E-14
286
APPENDIX NNN - Correlation Between Family Relationship and

Heterosexuality Personality Preferences of the Generation Z of the
Heterosexuality
Family
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 95 99 9025 9801 9405

2 94 96 8836 9216 9024
3 94 81 8836 6561 7614
4 93 80 8649 6400 7440
5 92 76 8464 5776 6992
6 92 73 8464 5329 6716
7 90 69 8100 4761 6210
8 89 69 7921 4761 6141
9 89 63 7921 3969 5607
10 89 59 7921 3481 5251
11 88 57 7744 3249 5016
12 88 57 7744 3249 5016
13 88 57 7744 3249 5016
14 88 53 7744 2809 4664
15 88 53 7744 2809 4664
16 88 53 7744 2809 4664
17 88 52 7744 2704 4576
18 88 52 7744 2704 4576
19 88 52 7744 2704 4576
20 88 52 7744 2704 4576
21 87 52 7569 2704 4524
22 86 52 7396 2704 4472
23 86 45 7396 2025 3870
24 86 45 7396 2025 3870
25 86 45 7396 2025 3870
26 86 39 7396 1521 3354
27 85 38 7225 1444 3230
28 85 38 7225 1444 3230
29 85 38 7225 1444 3230
30 85 38 7225 1444 3230
31 85 32 7225 1024 2720
32 85 31 7225 961 2635
33 85 31 7225 961 2635
34 85 31 7225 961 2635
35 85 31 7225 961 2635
36 85 27 7225 729 2295
37 85 27 7225 729 2295
38 84 27 7056 729 2268
287
39 84 24 7056 576 2016

40 84 24 7056 576 2016
41 84 24 7056 576 2016
42 84 24 7056 576 2016
43 84 23 7056 529 1932
44 84 23 7056 529 1932
45 84 23 7056 529 1932
46 84 23 7056 529 1932
47 84 23 7056 529 1932
48 84 19 7056 361 1596
49 83 19 6889 361 1577
50 83 19 6889 361 1577
51 83 19 6889 361 1577
52 83 19 6889 361 1577
53 82 19 6724 361 1558
54 82 15 6724 225 1230
55 82 15 6724 225 1230
56 82 11 6724 121 902
57 81 11 6561 121 891
58 81 11 6561 121 891
59 81 11 6561 121 891
60 81 11 6561 121 891
61 81 8 6561 64 648
62 81 8 6561 64 648
63 81 8 6561 64 648
64 81 8 6561 64 648
65 81 8 6561 64 648
66 80 8 6400 64 640
67 80 8 6400 64 640
68 80 5 6400 25 400
69 80 5 6400 25 400
70 80 5 6400 25 400
71 80 5 6400 25 400
72 80 5 6400 25 400
73 80 5 6400 25 400
74 79 5 6241 25 395
75 79 5 6241 25 395
76 78 3 6084 9 234
77 78 3 6084 9 234
78 78 3 6084 9 234
79 77 3 5929 9 231
80 77 2 5929 4 154
81 77 2 5929 4 154
82 77 2 5929 4 154
83 77 2 5929 4 154
84 76 2 5776 4 152
85 76 1 5776 1 76
86 76 1 5776 1 76
87 76 1 5776 1 76
88 75 1 5625 1 75
89 75 1 5625 1 75
90 74 1 5476 1 74
288
91 72 1 5184 1 72
92 72 1 5184 1 72
93 72 1 5184 1 72
94 69 1 4761 1 69
Total 7792 2508 648440 123764 219002
Mean 82.89 26.68
Mean 82.89361702 26.68085106
Variance 27.2358728 611.2733928
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 1.94598E-46
P(T<=t) two-tail 3.89195E-46
289
APPENDIX OOO - Correlation Between Peer Relationship and

Heterosexuality
Peer
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 93 99 8649 9801 9207

2 91 96 8281 9216 8736
3 89 81 7921 6561 7209
4 88 80 7744 6400 7040
5 88 76 7744 5776 6688
6 87 73 7569 5329 6351
7 87 69 7569 4761 6003
8 86 69 7396 4761 5934
9 86 63 7396 3969 5418
10 85 59 7225 3481 5015
11 85 57 7225 3249 4845
12 84 57 7056 3249 4788
13 84 57 7056 3249 4788
14 84 53 7056 2809 4452
15 84 53 7056 2809 4452
16 84 53 7056 2809 4452
17 84 52 7056 2704 4368
18 83 52 6889 2704 4316
19 83 52 6889 2704 4316
20 83 52 6889 2704 4316
21 83 52 6889 2704 4316
22 83 52 6889 2704 4316
23 82 45 6724 2025 3690
24 82 45 6724 2025 3690
25 82 45 6724 2025 3690
26 82 39 6724 1521 3198
27 82 38 6724 1444 3116
28 82 38 6724 1444 3116
29 82 38 6724 1444 3116
30 81 38 6561 1444 3078
31 81 32 6561 1024 2592
32 81 31 6561 961 2511
33 81 31 6561 961 2511
34 81 31 6561 961 2511
35 80 31 6400 961 2480
36 80 27 6400 729 2160
37 80 27 6400 729 2160
38 80 27 6400 729 2160
290
39 80 24 6400 576 1920

40 80 24 6400 576 1920
41 80 24 6400 576 1920
42 79 24 6241 576 1896
43 79 23 6241 529 1817
44 79 23 6241 529 1817
45 79 23 6241 529 1817
46 79 23 6241 529 1817
47 79 23 6241 529 1817
48 79 19 6241 361 1501
49 79 19 6241 361 1501
50 79 19 6241 361 1501
51 79 19 6241 361 1501
52 79 19 6241 361 1501
53 79 19 6241 361 1501
54 79 15 6241 225 1185
55 78 15 6084 225 1170
56 78 11 6084 121 858
57 78 11 6084 121 858
58 78 11 6084 121 858
59 78 11 6084 121 858
60 78 11 6084 121 858
61 78 8 6084 64 624
62 78 8 6084 64 624
63 77 8 5929 64 616
64 77 8 5929 64 616
65 77 8 5929 64 616
66 77 8 5929 64 616
67 77 8 5929 64 616
68 77 5 5929 25 385
69 77 5 5929 25 385
70 77 5 5929 25 385
71 77 5 5929 25 385
72 77 5 5929 25 385
73 76 5 5776 25 380
74 76 5 5776 25 380
75 76 5 5776 25 380
76 75 3 5625 9 225
77 75 3 5625 9 225
78 74 3 5476 9 222
79 74 3 5476 9 222
80 74 2 5476 4 148
81 74 2 5476 4 148
82 74 2 5476 4 148
83 74 2 5476 4 148
84 73 2 5329 4 146
85 72 1 5184 1 72
86 72 1 5184 1 72
87 72 1 5184 1 72
88 72 1 5184 1 72
89 71 1 5041 1 71
90 71 1 5041 1 71
291
91 69 1 4761 1 69
92 67 1 4489 1 67
93 67 1 4489 1 67
94 64 1 4096 1 64
Total 7436 2508 590684 123764 209219
Mean 79.11 26.68
Mean 79.10638298 26.68085106
Variance 26.33264699 611.2733928
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 1.01263E-43
P(T<=t) two-tail 2.02526E-43
292
APPENDIX PPP - Correlation Between Academics and

Heterosexuality
Preference
1 91 99 8281 9801 9009

2 91 96 8281 9216 8736
3 90 81 8100 6561 7290
4 89 80 7921 6400 7120
5 88 76 7744 5776 6688
6 88 73 7744 5329 6424
7 88 69 7744 4761 6072
8 88 69 7744 4761 6072
9 88 63 7744 3969 5544
10 87 59 7569 3481 5133
11 87 57 7569 3249 4959
12 87 57 7569 3249 4959
13 86 57 7396 3249 4902
14 86 53 7396 2809 4558
15 86 53 7396 2809 4558
16 86 53 7396 2809 4558
17 86 52 7396 2704 4472
18 85 52 7225 2704 4420
19 84 52 7056 2704 4368
20 84 52 7056 2704 4368
21 84 52 7056 2704 4368
22 84 52 7056 2704 4368
23 84 45 7056 2025 3780
24 84 45 7056 2025 3780
25 84 45 7056 2025 3780
26 84 39 7056 1521 3276
27 84 38 7056 1444 3192
28 84 38 7056 1444 3192
29 83 38 6889 1444 3154
30 83 38 6889 1444 3154
31 83 32 6889 1024 2656
32 83 31 6889 961 2573
33 83 31 6889 961 2573
34 83 31 6889 961 2573
35 82 31 6724 961 2542
36 82 27 6724 729 2214
37 82 27 6724 729 2214
38 82 27 6724 729 2214
293
39 82 24 6724 576 1968

40 82 24 6724 576 1968
41 82 24 6724 576 1968
42 82 24 6724 576 1968
43 82 23 6724 529 1886
44 81 23 6561 529 1863
45 81 23 6561 529 1863
46 81 23 6561 529 1863
47 81 23 6561 529 1863
48 81 19 6561 361 1539
49 81 19 6561 361 1539
50 80 19 6400 361 1520
51 80 19 6400 361 1520
52 80 19 6400 361 1520
53 80 19 6400 361 1520
54 80 15 6400 225 1200
55 80 15 6400 225 1200
56 80 11 6400 121 880
57 80 11 6400 121 880
58 79 11 6241 121 869
59 79 11 6241 121 869
60 79 11 6241 121 869
61 79 8 6241 64 632
62 79 8 6241 64 632
63 79 8 6241 64 632
64 79 8 6241 64 632
65 79 8 6241 64 632
66 78 8 6084 64 624
67 78 8 6084 64 624
68 78 5 6084 25 390
69 78 5 6084 25 390
70 77 5 5929 25 385
71 77 5 5929 25 385
72 77 5 5929 25 385
73 77 5 5929 25 385
74 77 5 5929 25 385
75 77 5 5929 25 385
76 77 3 5929 9 231
77 76 3 5776 9 228
78 75 3 5625 9 225
79 75 3 5625 9 225
80 75 2 5625 4 150
81 75 2 5625 4 150
82 74 2 5476 4 148
83 74 2 5476 4 148
84 74 2 5476 4 148
85 74 1 5476 1 74
86 73 1 5329 1 73
87 73 1 5329 1 73
88 73 1 5329 1 73
89 72 1 5184 1 72
90 72 1 5184 1 72
294
91 71 1 5041 1 71
92 71 1 5041 1 71
93 70 1 4900 1 70
94 68 1 4624 1 68
Total 7577 2508 613099 123764 212816
Mean 80.61 26.68
Mean 80.60638298 26.68085106
Variance 25.20899108 611.2733928
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 1.29445E-44
295
APPENDIX QQQ - Correlation Between Social Networking and

Heterosexuality
Social
Personality
Networking
Preference
1 85 99 7225 9801 8415

2 85 96 7225 9216 8160
3 83 81 6889 6561 6723
4 83 80 6889 6400 6640
5 83 76 6889 5776 6308
6 82 73 6724 5329 5986
7 82 69 6724 4761 5658
8 82 69 6724 4761 5658
9 82 63 6724 3969 5166
10 81 59 6561 3481 4779
11 80 57 6400 3249 4560
12 80 57 6400 3249 4560
13 80 57 6400 3249 4560
14 80 53 6400 2809 4240
15 80 53 6400 2809 4240
16 80 53 6400 2809 4240
17 80 52 6400 2704 4160
18 80 52 6400 2704 4160
19 79 52 6241 2704 4108
20 79 52 6241 2704 4108
21 79 52 6241 2704 4108
22 79 52 6241 2704 4108
23 79 45 6241 2025 3555
24 79 45 6241 2025 3555
25 79 45 6241 2025 3555
26 79 39 6241 1521 3081
27 78 38 6084 1444 2964
28 78 38 6084 1444 2964
29 78 38 6084 1444 2964
30 78 38 6084 1444 2964
31 78 32 6084 1024 2496
32 78 31 6084 961 2418
33 78 31 6084 961 2418
34 78 31 6084 961 2418
35 78 31 6084 961 2418
36 78 27 6084 729 2106
37 78 27 6084 729 2106
38 78 27 6084 729 2106
296
39 78 24 6084 576 1872

40 78 24 6084 576 1872
41 77 24 5929 576 1848
42 77 24 5929 576 1848
43 77 23 5929 529 1771
44 77 23 5929 529 1771
45 77 23 5929 529 1771
46 77 23 5929 529 1771
47 77 23 5929 529 1771
48 77 19 5929 361 1463
49 76 19 5776 361 1444
50 76 19 5776 361 1444
51 76 19 5776 361 1444
52 76 19 5776 361 1444
53 76 19 5776 361 1444
54 76 15 5776 225 1140
55 76 15 5776 225 1140
56 75 11 5625 121 825
57 75 11 5625 121 825
58 75 11 5625 121 825
59 75 11 5625 121 825
60 75 11 5625 121 825
61 74 8 5476 64 592
62 74 8 5476 64 592
63 74 8 5476 64 592
64 74 8 5476 64 592
65 74 8 5476 64 592
66 73 8 5329 64 584
67 73 8 5329 64 584
68 73 5 5329 25 365
69 73 5 5329 25 365
70 73 5 5329 25 365
71 73 5 5329 25 365
72 73 5 5329 25 365
73 73 5 5329 25 365
74 72 5 5184 25 360
75 72 5 5184 25 360
76 72 3 5184 9 216
77 72 3 5184 9 216
78 72 3 5184 9 216
79 72 3 5184 9 216
80 71 2 5041 4 142
81 71 2 5041 4 142
82 71 2 5041 4 142
83 71 2 5041 4 142
84 70 2 4900 4 140
85 70 1 4900 1 70
86 69 1 4761 1 69
87 69 1 4761 1 69
88 68 1 4624 1 68
89 68 1 4624 1 68
90 67 1 4489 1 67
297
91 67 1 4489 1 67
92 66 1 4356 1 66
93 66 1 4356 1 66
94 65 1 4225 1 65
Total 7130 2508 542632 123764 199401
Mean 75.85 26.68
Mean 75.85106383 26.68085106
Variance 19.50446122 611.2733928
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 2.71559E-40
P(T<=t) two-tail 5.43118E-40
298
APPENDIX RRR - Correlation Between Family Relationship and

Aggression Personality Preferences of the Generation Z of the
Aggression
Family
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 95 99 9025 9801 9405

2 94 99 8836 9801 9306
3 94 98 8836 9604 9212
4 93 98 8649 9604 9114
5 92 98 8464 9604 9016
6 92 95 8464 9025 8740
7 90 95 8100 9025 8550
8 89 95 7921 9025 8455
9 89 92 7921 8464 8188
10 89 92 7921 8464 8188
11 88 92 7744 8464 8096
12 88 92 7744 8464 8096
13 88 92 7744 8464 8096
14 88 92 7744 8464 8096
15 88 89 7744 7921 7832
16 88 89 7744 7921 7832
17 88 89 7744 7921 7832
18 88 89 7744 7921 7832
19 88 89 7744 7921 7832
20 88 89 7744 7921 7832
21 87 89 7569 7921 7743
22 86 89 7396 7921 7654
23 86 89 7396 7921 7654
24 86 88 7396 7744 7568
25 86 84 7396 7056 7224
26 86 84 7396 7056 7224
27 85 84 7225 7056 7140
28 85 84 7225 7056 7140
29 85 84 7225 7056 7140
30 85 79 7225 6241 6715
31 85 79 7225 6241 6715
32 85 79 7225 6241 6715
33 85 79 7225 6241 6715
34 85 79 7225 6241 6715
35 85 79 7225 6241 6715
36 85 79 7225 6241 6715
37 85 79 7225 6241 6715
38 84 79 7056 6241 6636
299
39 84 77 7056 5929 6468

40 84 74 7056 5476 6216
41 84 74 7056 5476 6216
42 84 66 7056 4356 5544
43 84 66 7056 4356 5544
44 84 66 7056 4356 5544
45 84 66 7056 4356 5544
46 84 66 7056 4356 5544
47 84 66 7056 4356 5544
48 84 66 7056 4356 5544
49 83 65 6889 4225 5395
50 83 65 6889 4225 5395
51 83 65 6889 4225 5395
52 83 65 6889 4225 5395
53 82 65 6724 4225 5330
54 82 60 6724 3600 4920
55 82 60 6724 3600 4920
56 82 60 6724 3600 4920
57 81 60 6561 3600 4860
58 81 60 6561 3600 4860
59 81 60 6561 3600 4860
60 81 60 6561 3600 4860
61 81 60 6561 3600 4860
62 81 60 6561 3600 4860
63 81 57 6561 3249 4617
64 81 57 6561 3249 4617
65 81 57 6561 3249 4617
66 80 57 6400 3249 4560
67 80 51 6400 2601 4080
68 80 51 6400 2601 4080
69 80 51 6400 2601 4080
70 80 51 6400 2601 4080
71 80 47 6400 2209 3760
72 80 44 6400 1936 3520
73 80 44 6400 1936 3520
74 79 44 6241 1936 3476
75 79 44 6241 1936 3476
76 78 44 6084 1936 3432
77 78 40 6084 1600 3120
78 78 40 6084 1600 3120
79 77 40 5929 1600 3080
80 77 40 5929 1600 3080
81 77 36 5929 1296 2772
82 77 36 5929 1296 2772
83 77 32 5929 1024 2464
84 76 32 5776 1024 2432
85 76 32 5776 1024 2432
86 76 32 5776 1024 2432
87 76 27 5776 729 2052
88 75 27 5625 729 2025
89 75 27 5625 729 2025
90 74 21 5476 441 1554
300
91 72 21 5184 441 1512

92 72 17 5184 289 1224
93 72 2 5184 4 144
94 69 1 4761 1 69
Total 7792 6103 648440 449393 517155
Mean 82.89 64.93
Mean 79.10638298 64.92553191
Variance 26.33264699 571.5320293
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 6.64228E-11
P(T<=t) two-tail 1.32846E-10
301
APPENDIX SSS - Correlation Between Peer Relationship and

Aggression
Peer
Personality
Relationship
Preference
1 93 99 8649 9801 9207

2 91 99 8281 9801 9009
3 89 98 7921 9604 8722
4 88 98 7744 9604 8624
5 88 98 7744 9604 8624
6 87 95 7569 9025 8265
7 87 95 7569 9025 8265
8 86 95 7396 9025 8170
9 86 92 7396 8464 7912
10 85 92 7225 8464 7820
11 85 92 7225 8464 7820
12 84 92 7056 8464 7728
13 84 92 7056 8464 7728
14 84 92 7056 8464 7728
15 84 89 7056 7921 7476
16 84 89 7056 7921 7476
17 84 89 7056 7921 7476
18 83 89 6889 7921 7387
19 83 89 6889 7921 7387
20 83 89 6889 7921 7387
21 83 89 6889 7921 7387
22 83 89 6889 7921 7387
23 82 89 6724 7921 7298
24 82 88 6724 7744 7216
25 82 84 6724 7056 6888
26 82 84 6724 7056 6888
27 82 84 6724 7056 6888
28 82 84 6724 7056 6888
29 82 84 6724 7056 6888
30 81 79 6561 6241 6399
31 81 79 6561 6241 6399
32 81 79 6561 6241 6399
33 81 79 6561 6241 6399
34 81 79 6561 6241 6399
35 80 79 6400 6241 6320
36 80 79 6400 6241 6320
37 80 79 6400 6241 6320
38 80 79 6400 6241 6320
302
39 80 77 6400 5929 6160

40 80 74 6400 5476 5920
41 80 74 6400 5476 5920
42 79 66 6241 4356 5214
43 79 66 6241 4356 5214
44 79 66 6241 4356 5214
45 79 66 6241 4356 5214
46 79 66 6241 4356 5214
47 79 66 6241 4356 5214
48 79 66 6241 4356 5214
49 79 65 6241 4225 5135
50 79 65 6241 4225 5135
51 79 65 6241 4225 5135
52 79 65 6241 4225 5135
53 79 65 6241 4225 5135
54 79 60 6241 3600 4740
55 78 60 6084 3600 4680
56 78 60 6084 3600 4680
57 78 60 6084 3600 4680
58 78 60 6084 3600 4680
59 78 60 6084 3600 4680
60 78 60 6084 3600 4680
61 78 60 6084 3600 4680
62 78 60 6084 3600 4680
63 77 57 5929 3249 4389
64 77 57 5929 3249 4389
65 77 57 5929 3249 4389
66 77 57 5929 3249 4389
67 77 51 5929 2601 3927
68 77 51 5929 2601 3927
69 77 51 5929 2601 3927
70 77 51 5929 2601 3927
71 77 47 5929 2209 3619
72 77 44 5929 1936 3388
73 76 44 5776 1936 3344
74 76 44 5776 1936 3344
75 76 44 5776 1936 3344
76 75 44 5625 1936 3300
77 75 40 5625 1600 3000
78 74 40 5476 1600 2960
79 74 40 5476 1600 2960
80 74 40 5476 1600 2960
81 74 36 5476 1296 2664
82 74 36 5476 1296 2664
83 74 32 5476 1024 2368
84 73 32 5329 1024 2336
85 72 32 5184 1024 2304
86 72 32 5184 1024 2304
87 72 27 5184 729 1944
88 72 27 5184 729 1944
89 71 27 5041 729 1917
90 71 21 5041 441 1491
303
91 69 21 4761 441 1449

92 67 17 4489 289 1139
93 67 2 4489 4 134
94 64 1 4096 1 64
Total 7436 6103 590684 449393 493772
Mean 79.11 64.93
Mean 79.10638298 64.92553191
Variance 26.33264699 571.5320293
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 6.64228E-11
P(T<=t) two-tail 1.32846E-10
304
APPENDIX TTT - Correlation Between Academics and Aggression

Aggression
Preference
1 91 99 8281 9801 9009

2 91 99 8281 9801 9009
3 90 98 8100 9604 8820
4 89 98 7921 9604 8722
5 88 98 7744 9604 8624
6 88 95 7744 9025 8360
7 88 95 7744 9025 8360
8 88 95 7744 9025 8360
9 88 92 7744 8464 8096
10 87 92 7569 8464 8004
11 87 92 7569 8464 8004
12 87 92 7569 8464 8004
13 86 92 7396 8464 7912
14 86 92 7396 8464 7912
15 86 89 7396 7921 7654
16 86 89 7396 7921 7654
17 86 89 7396 7921 7654
18 85 89 7225 7921 7565
19 84 89 7056 7921 7476
20 84 89 7056 7921 7476
21 84 89 7056 7921 7476
22 84 89 7056 7921 7476
23 84 89 7056 7921 7476
24 84 88 7056 7744 7392
25 84 84 7056 7056 7056
26 84 84 7056 7056 7056
27 84 84 7056 7056 7056
28 84 84 7056 7056 7056
29 83 84 6889 7056 6972
30 83 79 6889 6241 6557
31 83 79 6889 6241 6557
32 83 79 6889 6241 6557
33 83 79 6889 6241 6557
34 83 79 6889 6241 6557
35 82 79 6724 6241 6478
36 82 79 6724 6241 6478
37 82 79 6724 6241 6478
38 82 79 6724 6241 6478
305
39 82 77 6724 5929 6314

40 82 74 6724 5476 6068
41 82 74 6724 5476 6068
42 82 66 6724 4356 5412
43 82 66 6724 4356 5412
44 81 66 6561 4356 5346
45 81 66 6561 4356 5346
46 81 66 6561 4356 5346
47 81 66 6561 4356 5346
48 81 66 6561 4356 5346
49 81 65 6561 4225 5265
50 80 65 6400 4225 5200
51 80 65 6400 4225 5200
52 80 65 6400 4225 5200
53 80 65 6400 4225 5200
54 80 60 6400 3600 4800
55 80 60 6400 3600 4800
56 80 60 6400 3600 4800
57 80 60 6400 3600 4800
58 79 60 6241 3600 4740
59 79 60 6241 3600 4740
60 79 60 6241 3600 4740
61 79 60 6241 3600 4740
62 79 60 6241 3600 4740
63 79 57 6241 3249 4503
64 79 57 6241 3249 4503
65 79 57 6241 3249 4503
66 78 57 6084 3249 4446
67 78 51 6084 2601 3978
68 78 51 6084 2601 3978
69 78 51 6084 2601 3978
70 77 51 5929 2601 3927
71 77 47 5929 2209 3619
72 77 44 5929 1936 3388
73 77 44 5929 1936 3388
74 77 44 5929 1936 3388
75 77 44 5929 1936 3388
76 77 44 5929 1936 3388
77 76 40 5776 1600 3040
78 75 40 5625 1600 3000
79 75 40 5625 1600 3000
80 75 40 5625 1600 3000
81 75 36 5625 1296 2700
82 74 36 5476 1296 2664
83 74 32 5476 1024 2368
84 74 32 5476 1024 2368
85 74 32 5476 1024 2368
86 73 32 5329 1024 2336
87 73 27 5329 729 1971
88 73 27 5329 729 1971
89 72 27 5184 729 1944
90 72 21 5184 441 1512
306
91 71 21 5041 441 1491

92 71 17 5041 289 1207
93 70 2 4900 4 140
94 68 1 4624 1 68
Total 7577 6103 613099 449393 502880
Mean 80.61 64.93
Mean 80.60638298 64.92553191
Variance 25.20899108 571.5320293
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 1.72546E-12
P(T<=t) two-tail 3.45093E-12
307
APPENDIX UUU - Correlation Between Social Networking and

Aggression
Social
Personality
Networking
Preference
1 85 99 7225 9801 8415

2 85 99 7225 9801 8415
3 83 98 6889 9604 8134
4 83 98 6889 9604 8134
5 83 98 6889 9604 8134
6 82 95 6724 9025 7790
7 82 95 6724 9025 7790
8 82 95 6724 9025 7790
9 82 92 6724 8464 7544
10 81 92 6561 8464 7452
11 80 92 6400 8464 7360
12 80 92 6400 8464 7360
13 80 92 6400 8464 7360
14 80 92 6400 8464 7360
15 80 89 6400 7921 7120
16 80 89 6400 7921 7120
17 80 89 6400 7921 7120
18 80 89 6400 7921 7120
19 79 89 6241 7921 7031
20 79 89 6241 7921 7031
21 79 89 6241 7921 7031
22 79 89 6241 7921 7031
23 79 89 6241 7921 7031
24 79 88 6241 7744 6952
25 79 84 6241 7056 6636
26 79 84 6241 7056 6636
27 78 84 6084 7056 6552
28 78 84 6084 7056 6552
29 78 84 6084 7056 6552
30 78 79 6084 6241 6162
31 78 79 6084 6241 6162
32 78 79 6084 6241 6162
33 78 79 6084 6241 6162
34 78 79 6084 6241 6162
35 78 79 6084 6241 6162
36 78 79 6084 6241 6162
37 78 79 6084 6241 6162
38 78 79 6084 6241 6162
308
39 78 77 6084 5929 6006

40 78 74 6084 5476 5772
41 77 74 5929 5476 5698
42 77 66 5929 4356 5082
43 77 66 5929 4356 5082
44 77 66 5929 4356 5082
45 77 66 5929 4356 5082
46 77 66 5929 4356 5082
47 77 66 5929 4356 5082
48 77 66 5929 4356 5082
49 76 65 5776 4225 4940
50 76 65 5776 4225 4940
51 76 65 5776 4225 4940
52 76 65 5776 4225 4940
53 76 65 5776 4225 4940
54 76 60 5776 3600 4560
55 76 60 5776 3600 4560
56 75 60 5625 3600 4500
57 75 60 5625 3600 4500
58 75 60 5625 3600 4500
59 75 60 5625 3600 4500
60 75 60 5625 3600 4500
61 74 60 5476 3600 4440
62 74 60 5476 3600 4440
63 74 57 5476 3249 4218
64 74 57 5476 3249 4218
65 74 57 5476 3249 4218
66 73 57 5329 3249 4161
67 73 51 5329 2601 3723
68 73 51 5329 2601 3723
69 73 51 5329 2601 3723
70 73 51 5329 2601 3723
71 73 47 5329 2209 3431
72 73 44 5329 1936 3212
73 73 44 5329 1936 3212
74 72 44 5184 1936 3168
75 72 44 5184 1936 3168
76 72 44 5184 1936 3168
77 72 40 5184 1600 2880
78 72 40 5184 1600 2880
79 72 40 5184 1600 2880
80 71 40 5041 1600 2840
81 71 36 5041 1296 2556
82 71 36 5041 1296 2556
83 71 32 5041 1024 2272
84 70 32 4900 1024 2240
85 70 32 4900 1024 2240
86 69 32 4761 1024 2208
87 69 27 4761 729 1863
88 68 27 4624 729 1836
89 68 27 4624 729 1836
90 67 21 4489 441 1407
309
91 67 21 4489 441 1407

92 66 17 4356 289 1122
93 66 2 4356 4 132
94 65 1 4225 1 65
Total 7130 6103 542632 449393 472547
Mean 75.85 64.93
Mean 75.85106383 64.92553191
Variance 19.50446122 571.5320293
Observations 94 94
df 93
P(T<=t) one-tail 2.48214E-07
P(T<=t) two-tail 4.96429E-07

Manalese Thesis

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Manalese Thesis

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL MEDIA ON THE PERSONALITY

PREFERENCES OF THE GENERATION Z OF THE

THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

“Personality is to a man what perfume is to a flower” (Charles M.

a person is cheerful, carefree, timid, calm, dominant, or sociable all depends

on that individual’s personality. Our personality is what makes us distinct from

personality is comprised of our patterns of thinking, feeling, and behaving. It

is deeply ingrained in us and it is what characterizes our uniqueness. As

collective personality seems to take place in certain age groups.

The concept of collective personality refers to a group’s consistent

behaviors across time and context. Because of current trends, people in a

were born in 1995-2012. This generation have their stereotyped

characteristics, qualities, traits and personalities. It is a given fact that we all

to environmental factors, influence from interpersonal relationships, and

effects of technological advancements.

One very prominent technological advancement that has brought about

a change to our personality, especially to the youth nowadays, is the social

technology than of the past generations, they grew up in a society in which

advancement made in our technology, it has captured the interest of many.

It changed majority of the youth’s preferences, such as their preferences in

to determine the effects of social media on the respective respondents’

Background of the Study

Personality has been said to be the most dynamic aspect of an

individual. It is what makes individual differences among us exist. The

researcher had an interest in doing this study to determine the significance of

personality preferences in relation as to how are these affected by our

prominent and essential medium in our daily lives. By being exposed to

different social media, we are influenced by the people we engage with

through online communication. We meet a vast of virtual friends through these

social media and in a way, we unconsciously adapt their way of behaving.

influencing our preferences. On another aspect, the researcher had an interest

in studying the generation z and their personality. This classification of

in today’s time. Since this generation particularly grew up in a different

environment in terms of technology they grew up with including the media

post-millennials. Hence, this study was made to determine this generation’s

In order to look into the personality preferences of Post-Millennials, the

Type Theory of Personality

Type theories of personality divide people into distinct groups on the

basis of a combination of preferred behavior and focusing on similarities

between people. Within Jung’s 1969 analytical psychology, although he did

not deny the uniqueness and complexity of each individual, he nevertheless

judgements. Individuals choose either perception or judgement as a dominant

be determined (DiCaprio, 2001). The various personality types differ in their

different ambitions and respond to different rewards (Jung, 2000). When

considering personality types, people are grouped or classified in discrete

categories in which they are perceived as exclusively their type, with no

characteristics of one or other type. Traits, involve classifying or categorizing

people in terms of how much of some characteristics they possess (Pervin,

very small amount to a large amount of the characteristic (Feist, 2004). In

this research, personality is viewed from a type perspective. Therefore, the

discussion continues with an analysis of type theory, as well as the way

personality is measured according to this approach.

This theory is a large determinant in looking at the stereotyped

personalities that belong to each person as well as generations. This theory

helps in classifying what traits characterizes majority of the members of each

generation. The research then relied on the Type Theory of Personality.

INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT

millennial’s use of social media affects their family relationship, peer

relationship, academics and social networking, and the profile of the

Generation Z of the College of the Holy Spirit of Tarlac in terms of

Achievement, Deference, Order, Exhibition, Autonomy, Affiliation,

Interception, Succorance, Dominance, Abasement, Nurturance, Change,

Endurance, Heterosexuality, and Aggression Personality Preferences.