Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Poetry in Argumentation
Poetry in Argumentation
Carly Carlos
9/29/2019
Poetry in Argumentation
With the Revolutionary period in full swing in America, the patriots of New England
were required to choose sides in the feud between the colonists and their English colonizers. This
is the period in which Thomas Paine’s “Liberty Tree” and Hannah Griffitts’s “Upon reading a
Book entitled Common Sense” are written and set in. The personas of both poems believe that
they know what is best for their country but have different opinions on how to reach that goal.
Both speakers generally agree that America’s freedom is something that the colonists
should strive for. This argument is more obvious in Paine’s “Liberty Tree”, as the speaker talks
about the “Liberty Tree” (8) and how it must be protected from “all the tyrannical powers” (26).
In this case, the tyrannical powers are England, and the tree of liberty is planted in Boston,
implying that the colonists must defend their home as well as their rights as men. Paine’s persona
here is triumphant, proud, and idealistic with the intention to rally the colonies together to fight
the oppressive English and gain their independence. On the other hand, the persona in Griffitts’s
“Upon reading a Book…” is less blatant about their agreement in this idea. The persona here is
more disgusted and angrier than Paine’s persona. They are disgusted that Paine’s ideas in
Common Sense are “A deeper Wound at Freedom” (5) than anything that the British have done.
This disgusted tone implies not that the persona doesn’t want freedom for their country, but that
Paine’s ideas aren’t the way to get there. In fact, the persona seems to believe that Paine’s ideas
are bringing the nation farther from freedom than towards it. While Griffitts’s persona doesn’t
provide an answer as to how to properly bring America to freedom, they do make it clear that
Carlos 2
they dislike Paine’s idealistic approach where “The moderate Man is held to publick View” (11).
In other words, Paine’s eagerness to rile up public opinion to a war drowns out the words of
more moderate and thoughtful men, leaving them to be hushed in fear of public opinion turning
on them. The implication here is that Griffitts’s persona believes that the more moderate men
would have the proper answer to work with the British instead of rousing a war.
Thus, Paine’s persona believes that freedom will be won by fighting back their
oppressors, and Griffitts’s persona believes that freedom is best won by not following Paine’s
ideals in Common Sense. Paine’s persona is triumphant and proud, while Griffitts’s persona is
disgusted and angry. While these two differ in ideas on whether or not to fight the English, they
both generally agree that freedom is important for the colonies to obtain.
Carlos 3
Works Cited
Griffitts, Hannah. “Upon Reading a Book Entitled Common Sense.” American Poetry: the
Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, by David S. Shields, The Library of America, 2007,
pp. 561–562.
Paine, Thomas. “Liberty Tree.” American Poetry: the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, by
David S. Shields, The Library of America, 2007, pp. 614–615.