Bayot advertisement trade Ledesma v. climacounsel de oficio electrion registrar; privillege Climaco withdraw as counsel de burdened with oficio conditions Cui v. Cui cuidad, care, hospicio de san titulo de abogado; definition of jose means lawyer, not lawyer; llb has holder of llb little to do with admission; power of court Villegas v. villegaslator congress prohibited definition of Valentino from appearing as appearance; counsel; here, only in reason of non-appellate courts prohibition re legislators Alawi v. Alauya alauyan title member of sharia bar sharia bar not fully fledged passer not fully member of regular bar; fledged cant use atty title attorney; title reserved for those authorized Pangan v. Panganlan (Pedro DD can't use name in law do no Ramos Ramos) practice other than the falsehood; one stated in rollo; else, means deception consistent with truth and honor In Re Medado meedad na nung nag sign forgot to sign rollo; 30 canon 9; yrs; signing allowed but unauthorized deferred 1 yr practice of law Cayetano v. lawyer-economist; definition of Monsod lawyer-manager, etc. practice of law practice of law. Soriano v. sori nag overtake kasi homicide, or any crime, GMC Dizon may or may not involve continuing moral turpitude, requirement depending on circumstances. Here, IMT kasi mayabang yung lawyer Wellington gaaman, nang eextort for extortion, NBI delay no man Reyes v. Gaa estafa entrapment, delay no man for money or malice, disbarred Ting-Dumali v. torres title issuance tungkol sa mana, lawyer's oath Torres concealed fact in not mere affidavit he notarized; ceremony; advised falsification of canon1, 1.02; public document; canon 7; canon offered false testimony. 10, 10.01 Disbarred People v. tuanda, tinda alahas agent to sell jewelry, bp 22 may Tuanda didn’t return unsold, involve MT; not issued checks. related to office Bounced. Acquitted of but relates to estafa but convicted of GMC charges of bp 22. suspended by CA. involves moral turpitude, not related to office but speaks of moral character. In Re Abad in another case, he two essential didn't take the oath but requisites to be signed rollo. He admitted; practiced law without LO+signing taking oath. In this case, he denied having practiced law under oath (perjury). Fined again, and still unauthorized to practice law. Aguirre v. Rana Rana nag oath muna passed bar, but even two essential before oath taking and requisites to be signing of rollo, he admitted; appeared as counsel for LO+signing vice mayor and mayor candidate in masbate. Day before oath taking, case was filed. Unauthorized practice of law, denied admission. In Re Edillon doesn’t want to pay IBP justification of membership fees lol IBP; police power; practice of law privilege vested w public interest; rule making power SC In Re Lanuevo OBC mere custodian cannot re- evaluate booklets; serious misconduct (lanuevo); need to state any charge even if not IMT; failure is fraudulent People v. villaguna city prosec city prosec allowed by characteristics Villanueva SOJ and JP court to act of practice of as private prosecutor for law his relative. Defense counsel moved to inhibit. Allowed; private practice of law is not isolated appearance but characterized by habituality and compensation. Dia-Anonuevo bercaso tumanggap yung mtj judge ex-officio definition of v. Bercacio judge notary public notarized private practice DOAS which was co- owned by complainant. Latter went to him and judge gave advice to redeem, asked for redemption price+incidental fees (3500+100). Ayaw isauli. Engaged in private practice--gave advise, accepted compensation, dealt with complainant, appeared at pre-trial. In Re Abad Bacarro v. pintacanak sweethearts, promised importance of Pintacan marriage, nabuntis, good moral asked to abort, ayaw ng character babae, abandoned. Even denied under oath that child was his. Court ordered to acknowledge in public document the filiation as sign of good faith, but complainant commented that he be disallowed from admission. 1979 yung huling activity. 8 years later, allowed to take oath. good moral character now present, turned over new leaf. In Re Argosino camaligan neophyte good moral hazing, convicted of character reqt reckless imprudence, purposes; petitioned to take oath. weed out and Father kinda forgave, prevent left it to court to allow. Court allowed. Good moral character requirement not only continuing reqt to weed out, but prevent misfits from joining. Collantes v. RD refused to register lawyer's oath Renomeron instruments, 15 years, source of sinabi na ng LRA na obligation, iregister, ayaw pa rin. delay no man; Removed from govt applies to pub service. Can he be officers disbarred for grave misconduct as public official? Yes. Montecillo and del mar's client filed oral s20(b)r138; Del Mar v. Gica defamation. Cfi ruled in criminal their favor. CA reversed. contempt SC upheld. Meanwhile, meaning veiled threats to CA and even to SC. Mayabang, ayaw patinag. Suspended indefinitely. Criminal contempt In Re Diosdado attorney mayor conviction of Gutierrez convicted of murder. He CIMT; absolute was granted a v conditional conditional pardon, pardon remitting the rest of his sentence upon the condition that he shall not violate any penal laws. Still disbarred. For "conviction of CIMT" as ground for disbarment to be wiped, pardon has to be absolute. De Ysasi III v. father and son, C1.04; NLRC administrator-employee s20(g)r138 and owner of hacienda respectively, got into a family quabble which ended in the former's employment being terminated without cause. Court admonished lawyers that they should seek extrajudicial compromise instead of helping them litigate. Pajares v. Abad creditor sued debtor for c1.03 Santos collection of sum of money, but latter moved for bill of particulars. Judge denied, 65, also denied; petitioner and counsel admonished for unnecessarily delaying proceedings for 7 years, clogging court dockets with unnecessary and frivolous appeal. People v. atty estacio was counsel profession, not Rosqueta for accused-appellants, a trade or and failed file brief on business; c2 time. He was ordered to show cause why he failed to file brief on time, and apparently he did but left it with the father of the appellants but nasunog daw bahay nung tatay. Magwwithdraw na rin daw ng appeal yung mga accused. Still, admonished that even if can't secure fees from clients to file appeal, the better practice is to be appointed as counsel de oficio. De Roy and burned down firewall c5 Ramos v. CA and fell on neighbor, killing daughter too. Aug 17, 1987, last day of filing notice of appeal, petitioner's counsel filed motex; denied per Habaluyas ruling in 1986. No GOAD; that the SC decision was not published in OG does not prevent the same from acquiring binding force, lawyers must keep abreast with latest jurisprudence. People v. Judge 3 accused were charged c6.01 Pineda with multiple counts of murder and frustrated murder. The judge, upon insistence of accused, ordered prosec to merge informations to just one, because complex crime daw. Also, there was an affidavit during PI that robbery daw yung nacommit. No. Prosec cannot be forced to file information when he thinks evidence will not support it. People v. solgen recommended c6.01 Madera acquittal of two guys with madera; proper kasi no evidence of conspiracy. True objective of fiscal is not to convict but see that justice is done. Tan v. Judge MNT and motion to c6.01 Gallardo disqualify judge from conducting trial, because judge convicted accused and there were contested allegations of bribery. SolGen recommended that MNT be granted. Private prosecs opposed. SolGen represents the state in these crim proceedings. SolGen assists State in governing, and governing impartially. Thus, his job is not primarily to convict but to bring about justice. People v. Sendaydiego Misamin v. San police captain appeared Juan as counsel for fil-chi employers; charged with protecting alien interests and coercing complainant from desisting. Investigated by solgen but counsel for complainant did not appear. Still, court admonished that lawyers should refrain from appearances of impropriety.