You are on page 1of 3

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/329077903

Design Procedures for Rectangular Patch Antennas

Conference Paper · January 2018


DOI: 10.1049/cp.2018.1033

CITATION READS

1 482

3 authors:

Giulia Buttazzoni Alessandro Cuttin


University of Trieste University of Trieste
33 PUBLICATIONS   110 CITATIONS    17 PUBLICATIONS   23 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Roberto Vescovo
University of Trieste
87 PUBLICATIONS   566 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

AtmoCube View project

picosats View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Alessandro Cuttin on 18 February 2019.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Design Procedures for Rectangular Patch Antennas
G. Buttazzoni, A. Cuttin and R. Vescovo
Department of Engineering and Architecture
University of Trieste
Via A. Valerio 10, 34127, Trieste, Italy
gbuttazzoni(vescovo)@units.it, alessandro.cuttin@phd.units.it

Abstract—The work presented in this paper aims at comparing z


different approaches for the design of a rectangular microstrip y
patch antenna operating at millimeter waves. In the paper,
the designed antenna is simulated using approximate formulas
available from previous research, and also using the electromag- Patch x
xf W
netic software CST (Computer Simulation Technology). Precisely, h Ws = 3W
Substrate, εr L
two optimization procedures are proposed for the same desired
antenna, one using the internal CST optimizer and the other Ls = 3L
the modeFRONTIER software, which is specifically designed
for solving optimization problems. All the obtained results are
Fig. 1. Rectangular patch antenna with dimensions L, W and coaxial feed
mutually compared, thus highlighting advantages and drawbacks probe at (xf , 0, 0) on a grounded substrate of dimensions Ls = 3L, Ws =
of these approaches. 3W , with given thickness h and dielectric constant εr .
Index Terms—comparative study, numerical formulas, opti-
mization software, rectangular patch antennas.
approximate procedure, or empirically determined) are used. A
comparison of all the results shows the improvement obtained
I. I NTRODUCTION by using the adopted softwares.
Microstrip antenna design is a very important topic within
the broad field of antennas. Their great development, both as II. D ESIGN S TRATEGIES
single radiators and in array configurations, has occurred since The geometry of the rectangular patch antenna with a coax-
the seventies of last century, thanks to the availability of good ial probe feed is depicted in Fig. 1. Duroid 5880 (produced
substrates with low loss tangent and attractive thermal and by Rogers Corp.) was chosen as a substrate material, with
mechanical properties, improved photolithographic techniques, permittivity εr =2.2. The substrate dimensions are Ws =3W
and better theoretical models [1]. Their numerous advantages, and Ls =3L, with thickness h=0.254 mm. The dimensions L
such as, for example, light weight, small volume, low cost, and W are the design parameters considered in the sequel:
compatibility with integrated circuits, made them attractive in L affects the resonant frequency, the resonant resistance and
many applications ranging approximately from 100 MHz to the E-plane radiation pattern; W affects the resonant frequency
100 GHz. Furthermore, some of their limitations, such as low and the H-plane radiation pattern; the feed location xf controls
gain and low power handling capabilities, can be overcome by the resonant resistance [7].
making use of array configurations [2]. Nowadays, there are
several applications of antenna arrays using microstrip radia- A. Approximate Results
tors such as, for example, satellite applications [3], microwave Previous research offers a great number of approximate
imaging systems [4], synthetic aperture radars [5] and wireless formulas for the design of microstrip rectangular patch an-
power transmission [6]. In this work, an introductory study tennas on a substrate of given thickness h, dielectric constant
is performed on the design of a rectangular microstrip patch εr and a desired resonant frequency fr . Unfortunately, the
antenna with coaxial probe feed. This antenna is intended to be ranges of validity of these formulas are often not known and
used as a basic element in an antenna array to be mounted on a they do not always yield mutually similar results [7]. After a
cubesat, which will operate in the Ka band, with a band-center detailed analysis of previous literature, we selected the most
frequency of 37.25 GHz. However, in this paper attention appropriate formulas for the patch dimensions and for the feed
will be focused only on the design of the single element. position. Specifically, three different formulations were used
In particular, formulas available from the literature for the for the patch dimensions W and L, which are denoted with:
analysis and synthesis of the physical properties of rectangular P #1 (equations (14-1), (14-2), (14-6), (14-7) in [2]), P #2
microstrip antenna elements are used, as well as optimization (equation (18) in [7] and equations (B.4) and (B.71) in [1]),
procedures provided by two commercial softwares. It will P #3 (equation (18) in [7] and equations (B.4) and (4.33a) in
be shown that the use of such optimization techniques may [1]). Furthermore, three different formulations were selected
avoid, or at least reduce, the trial-and-error process which for the feed position (xf ): F #1 (equations (4.78), (14-2), (14-
is necessary when the design formulas (either based on an 6) and (4.30) in [1]), F #2 (equations (18) and (13) in [7]),
TABLE I new information was used to update the parameter values. In
T HE OBTAINED VALUES FOR THE DESIGN PARAMETERS AND THE this context, the optimization was performed separately for
RESULTING PERFORMANCES SIMULATED WITH CST.
the patch dimensions, using a multiobjective algorithm (the
L W xf fres min|s11 | non-dominating sorting genetic algorithm, NSGA), and for the
Method feed position, using the simplex algorithm. The provided patch
[mm] [mm] [mm] [GHz] [dB]
P #1&F #1 2.324 3.181 0.823 39.72 −14.29 dimensions, which are shown in row 11 of Table I, agreed
P #1&F #2 2.324 3.181 0.730 39.45 −18.44 very well with those given by the CST internal optimizer, with
P #1&F #3 2.324 3.181 0.860 39.79 −13.30 the exception of the probe position. Nevertheless, the resonant
P #2&F #1 2.514 2.420 0.888 37.66 −6.31 frequency was very accurate.
P #2&F #2 2.514 2.420 0.803 37.42 −7.27
P #2&F #3 2.514 2.420 1.01 38.02 −5.48 III. C ONCLUSION
P #3&F #1 2.581 2.420 0.911 36.78 −5.91 In this paper a comparative study of different design tech-
P #3&F #2 2.581 2.420 0.825 36.51 −6.78 niques for a rectangular patch antenna with coaxial feed has
P #3&F #3 2.581 2.420 1.03 37.13 −5.17 been presented. The analyzed approaches can be divided into
CST 2.447 3.317 0.911 37.25 −61.94 two categories: approximate formulas and optimization soft-
modeFRONTIER 2.442 3.316 0.653 37.32 −64.76 wares. In particular, different formulations for dimensioning
the patch and for positioning the coaxial feed probe have been
investigated, giving rise to nine antenna configurations (rows
F #3 (equations (14-15), (14-16), (14-12) and (14.20a) in [2]). 1 to 9 of Table I), with results which were mutually differ-
The obtained parameter values, which specify the geometry ent in terms of optimized parameters and resulting antenna
of the antennas, the resonant frequency and the minimum performances. This suggested the adoption of an optimization
modulus of the s-parameter s11 , are listed in Table I, rows 1 process. Two numerical softwares have been used, giving
to 9. As it can be seen, there are significant differences in the comparable results in terms of both antenna geometry (with
design parameters, and in the obtained resonant frequencies. relative error less than 0.3% on the patch dimensions) and
B. Numerical Results resulting performances. Moreover, a comparison between the
method P #3&F #3 (which, among the analyzed approximate
The design formulas for rectangular patch antennas are methods, gave the resonance frequency closest to the desired
based either on approximate mathematical models or on ex- one) and the modeFRONTIER optimization, reveals relative
perimental results, and their accuracy is limited, as it was errors of 5.4% on L, 31.4% on W and 29.1% on xf .
shown above. As a consequence, for an accurate design CST and modeFRONTIER gave essentially the same results,
one has to use a trial-and-error process or a more helpful including the resonant frequency, with the exception of the
optimization technique. In this work, the internal optimizer of probe position. Finally, it is to be noted that in the context
CST has been used, and its results have been compared with of this work the use of the modeFRONTIER optimization
those obtained by using the commercial optimization software platform had the main aim of a validation tool.
ModeFRONTIER.
1) CST internal optimizer: The electromagnetic software
R EFERENCES
CST has an internal optimizer which can be set through
a graphical user interface. The optimizer allows to specify [1] R. Garg, P. Bhartia, I. Bahl, and A. Ittipiboon, Microstrip antenna design
handbook. Artech House, 2001.
the optimization variables, the goals of the optimization (and [2] C. A. Balanis, Antenna theory: analysis and design, 2nd ed. New York:
their weights, when more than one goal is selected), and John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1996.
the optimization algorithm. In this work, the Trust Region [3] G. Buttazzoni, M. Comisso, A. Cuttin, M. Fragiacomo, R. Vescovo, and
R. Vincenti Gatti, “Reconfigurable phased antenna array for extending
Algorithm has been used, while the optimization variables cubesat operations to Ka-band: Design and feasibility,” Acta Astronautica,
were the patch dimensions L, W and the feed location xf , and vol. 137, pp. 114–121, 2017.
the goal was that of minimizing |s11 | at the desired resonant [4] P. F. Li, S. W. Qu, S. Yang, and Z. P. Nie, “Microstrip array antenna with
2-d steerable focus in near-field region,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas
frequency fr = 37.25 GHz. Table I shows the obtained results and Propagation, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 4607–4617, Sept 2017.
in row 10. [5] G. Buttazzoni and R. Vescovo, “Deterministic and stochastic approach
2) modeFRONTIER optimization: As is specified by the to the synthesis of conformal arrays for sar applications,” in 2013
International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications
software house (ESTECO S.p.A., Trieste, Italy), modeFRON- (ICEAA), Turin, Italy, Sept 2013, pp. 520–523.
TIER is a multidisciplinary and multiobjective optimization [6] X. Yang, W. Geyi, and H. Sun, “Optimum design of wireless power trans-
platform capable of streamlining the engineering process mission system using microstrip patch antenna arrays,” IEEE Antennas
and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 16, pp. 1824–1827, 2017.
through state-of-the-art algorithms and the integration with [7] M. Kara, “Formulas for the computation of the physical properties of rect-
simulation softwares, either commercial or in-house codes [8]. angular microstrip antenna elements with various substrate thicknesses,”
In this work, the optimization process has been carried out Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 234–239,
Jul. 1996.
using modeFRONTIER in conjunction with CST. The user- [8] modeFRONTIER, ESTECO. [Online]. Available: http://www.esteco.com/
defined results of a CST simulation were read by mode- modefrontier
FRONTIER, a suitable cost function was evaluated and the

View publication stats

You might also like