You are on page 1of 2

Bar Questions:

Question no. 5

 The Stop and Freeze Rule?


1. Suspicious Act
2. Cause of Action

 Was the stop and freeze rule valid?


NO. No probable cause

 Shabu as evidence?
Inadmissable as evidence.

Rule in Checkpoint: Plain view Doctrine


In absence of search warrant, the evidence confiscated is not admissible
Exemption: Unless there is probable cause.

Question no. 8
Junjun Binay v.
Carpio-Morales v. Court of Appeals
Condonation Doctrine? No. He is not elected but appointed.

Senate v. Ermita
Hello Garci issue.

Electoral Sabotage
Dismiss the case.
Ask permission to the President before they appear.
Arnault was a French Lawyer who bought
Php 440,000 kanino binigay yung pera?
Cited with contempt and detained to Pasay City Jail
Eventually, he told the before the Congress that he gave the money to Jess
Santos.
Ruling: Senate or Congress can site any operative witness.

Bengson v. Senate Blue Ribbon Committee


Loma v. Marcoses have agreement that they will exchange properties.
Bengson, it was pending on Sandiganbayan.

Savio
Subpoena savio in Senate
Savio there is a EO that PCGG cannot be invite
Court: EO is not valid.

You might also like