A comprehensive DSC analysis was performed on different SMA wires to understand the thermal deformation cycle and identify the composition which has maximum thermodynamic efficiency at low temperatures under stress free condition. Supplementary Fig. S4(a)-(e) show the hysteresis across phase change and the transition temperature for each sample. Using this experimental heat flow diagram, the critical temperatures – Ms (martensite start), Mf (martensite finish), As (austenite start), and Af (austenite finish) – for forward and reverse transformation were quantified. It can be seen from Fig. S4 that wire 5 has the lowest forward transition temperature of 48 °C, which is most suitable for our heat engine. The difference between thermal energy goingin and coming-out of the wires was found to be very small, which should be the case since the DSC tests were run under no stress condition (no work). Residual heat accumulation may cause thermo-mechanical fatigue in the system. Fig. S5(a), (b) and (c) show detailed results on phase transition of the annealed sample. Thermal annealing results in shift of transition temperature from 48 °C to 54 °C. SMA wire was also characterized using dynamic mechanical analyzer (DMA) in order to determine the force dynamics and viscoelasticity properties. Detailed comparative study of damping and storage modulus values for as-received and annealed SMA samples are shown in Supplementary Fig. S6-8. We observed that with the increase of frequency the damping coefficient decreases, and with the increase of temperature scan rate the transition temperature of the wire increases.