The New Masters of Flight Control - JET ENGINES

NEW MASTERS OF FLIGHT CONTROL, Jet Engines Steering, ("JES") under Rotational Physics, Advantages
over common STALL-DANGEROUS designs. Images from Prof.-Dr. Benjamin Gal-Or books & Wikipedia
Masters of Flight
Jet Engines Steering

"JES", characterized by 20
Advantages [USAF 1-4]
of Tailless-Stealth-JES
Aircraft [General-1] & Stealth-JES Stealth Tailless JES X-44 [Id.]
Combat Jet Drones [Editorial1-10] over Conventional

(Aerodynamic Only) Flight Control, (CFC), cruise-missile-CFC and
common-rocket-CFC aka Thrust Vectoring.[General 1]
20 JES-Advantages in projected
6th-Generation Air Combat

(1) JES is based on rotational physics
vs. aircraft center of Gravity [Peer 1-7],
1

whereby high-g-load on pilot during WVR-TURNING is diminished if, under

JES-Physics-of-Rotation, is located close to or at a/c c.g.[USAF Funded 1-8]
(2) JES expands all "3 map limits" (front page), as digested today in studies of air
combat strategies and tactics in advanced pilot schools, etc. [Editorials 1-10. More below]
(3) JES adds 17 advantages that are not easy to comprehended even by experts.
Combat Physics Today

,
Cited by 80(+) References below & explained and illuminated next
"Speak not in the ears of a fool:

for he will despise the wisdom
of thy knowledge"
PROVERBS 23, (9)
• Jet Engine Steering is not easy to comprehend even by top experts.

• Citing high (e.g. 9g) A/C-TURNING-LOAD in WVR-engagements, top
experts often react to JES-POST-STALL-SUPER-AGILITY: "Professor,

you are absolutely wrong. Your JES-super-agility during 90(+) degrees
AOA is "impossible", no? ask any pilot, read your textbooks for first your
JES-A/C would disintegrate in mid-air by high-g. Some, like a top general,
2

were preparing to leave an invited HQ-Meeting, unwilling even to hear any

answer. And it first happened in 1986 in Israel, in Switzerland, in Germany, (see 3
publications cited by References 1-3, "Debates" and in a misleading entry "Thrust
Vectoring", Wikipedia.
• It was only in Boeing Wichita facilities, that in an invited meeting with 11 of its
experts, none left the meeting room partly because their president ordered to
execute import contract of JES to Boeing. So Boeing was first to understand the
JES Advantages and thus served JES as the basis of YF-22 SUPER-AGILITY.
So What is the imported

Combat Physics of JES-Rotation?
1) Since its total revolution of aviation, the jet engines was arrested to
provide only brute force forward.
2) Thrust reversing was added later to become mandatory in commercial aviation.
3) X-14 was an attempt to use rotational physics to secure yaw-roll-pitch flight control.
4) But the design failed partly for not being useful beyond an interesting R&D.
5) Hundreds ideas to use rocket-type thrust vectoring are cited by USP5,782,431.
6) IN SHORT: JES differs from rockets thrust vectoring with fixed nozzle shape.
7) JES nozzles vary in shape and orientation vs. throttle & pilot stick commands.
• And also vary with Mach Number AND Altitude. [see map].
• JES nozzles function during thousands of hours, not minutes.
• JES nozzles also vary by different sectional-construction-flaps,
• Also function under INTEGRATED FLIGHT PROPULSION CONTROL (IFPC),
• Which controls operating lines of engine compressors,
3

• That vary with throttle, altitude, speed, air inlet operation, engine age. Etc.
• BUT MOST IMPORTANT

• JEL DESIGNS REJECT the100-YRS-OLD Obsolete Flight Control aka CFC
• JES is almost free of stall-sensitive-dangerous wing-aerodynamics,
• JES is almost free of rudder CFC-aerodynamic-yaw (Cf. X-44 tailless JES-design)
• JES is almost free of stabilizers, canards, ailerons, pitch-roll-yaw CFC.
• JES replaces CFC in high-g-turning with Rotational Physics around a/c c.g.
It is thus misleading
to assign rocket experts and designers to take control of todays' advanced JES
vehicles' strategies, tactics, designs, manufacturing and deliveries.
Moreover, to certify a new JES JET ENGINE TAKES AT LEAST TWICE THE
TIME NEEDED TO CERTIFY AIRFRAMES and AVIONICS.
ACCORDINGLY, the 6th-Generation is projected to shift relevant PROJECTS
CONTROL FROM AIRFRAMERS to the JET ENGINES INDUSTRY.
In turn, the aforementioned SHIFTING includes the jet engine industry experts,
to master today's advanced JES-domains, e.g.:
(a) Safe FLIGHT CONTROL under stall-spin situations
(b) AIR COMBAT STRATEGIES, TACTICS in BVR vs. WVR
(e) PHYSICS of ROTATIONS AROUND combat a/c center-of-gravity.
4

20 JES-Advantages Over Extant, Rival CFC

1) JES allows Helicopter-Type, post-stall-Maneuverability,[General 1]
2) JES allows tailless designs that enhance stealth levels, Id.
3) JES allows Stall-Danger-Free WVR air combat, Id.
4) JES allows tailless designs like the classified X-44 design [USAF 1-4]
5) JES allows weight reduction, especially via tailless designs. Id.
6) JES allows improved sub and supersonic range increase, Id.
7) JES allows expansion of air combat maneuverability.[Editorials 1-11]
8) JES does NOT require jet-engine change. Id.
9) JES does NOT require airframe change. Id.
10) JES allows upgrading older a/c, e.g. F-15, F-16, F-18. [US Funding 1-8]
11) JES allows safe flight control when all airframe hydraulics fail. [Id.]
12) JES allows safe landing when under carriage partly fails. [Id.]
13) JES allows various mechanical JES-exhaust designs, [Prior Art 1-9]
14) JES allows various fluidics JES-exhaust-designs. [Additional 1-12]
15) JES allows deflections only of nozzle divergent section. [Editorials 1-11]
16) JES allows deflections of the entire nozzle, the Russian way. [Id.]
17) JES allows lowest cost, post-nozzle 3 or 4 deflectors.[Additional 11]
Mechanical shape and deflection

variations of JES nozzles. Some,
like on the USAF JES-F-22 RAPTOR,
are rectangular to improve stealth
levels.[Editorials, 3]
5

Assessment and Debates of Misleading Strategies, Tactics
Various references[Debates 1-3] doubt the effectiveness of JEL especially in

WVR engagements, giving rise to counter claims that neglecting
today JES-INDUCED-WVR-strategies and associated tactics-training,
[Editorials 1-11,
are self-defeating for the West, because Stealth Symmetry
General & Prior Art 1-9, Stealth Origin 1]
between the U.S., Russia, China, etc., is
gradually unfolding today for both manned and unmanned air
engagements within both 5th and 6th-Generation simulations.[Debates, 1,2,3]
That means that engaged rivals are forced to get closer and closer
to each other until WVR is established, whereby winners are not the
ones neglecting JES-WVR top advantages.[PEER REVIEW 1-7]
See
Misleading Wikipedia Entry on "Thrust Vectoring" below.
History of First Stealth-JES Flight Testing

First ever flight test of tailless, stealth,
post-stall-super-maneuverable JES
model prototype, took place in
1987.[History 1-3]
Stealth-JES-Cruise-Missile, An Example [General -1]
6

The first ever full-scale 1992 flight tests of Stealth-JES-ATF-YF-22,

have established the key advantages of JES over rival, Stealth (JES-
LESS) ATF-CFC YF-23 [Id.].
HISTORY OF JES THE WINNER
That 1992 JES WINS OVER EXTANT CFC had opened the gates to various new families,
mostly classified today, of to-tech-future Stealth-JES-Designs – a revolution that had started
from 1992 USAF Tailed-Sealth-JES-F-22-Raptor [Id.] preference, which has since led to
(classified) USAF Tailless, Stealth JES X-44 MANTA design [Editorial 1-11] and, recently, to
the $85B Program of Tailless-Stealth-"optionally manned" B-21 [Funded by USAF 1-8, (Classified)
Funded by U.S. INDUSTRY1-4]
and other U.S. and UK efforts.[Id.]
Russian Tailed, Not-Yet-Stealthy JES fighter aircraft families have followed up to the
forthcoming, 5th-Generation SU-57. And since 2018, Tailed, Non-Stealthy, Chinese JES J-
10B [Id.], etc. has joined the exclusive POST-STALL-JES-CLUB. [Id.] and to some extent
to Classified, related international programs projecting into the 6th-Generation-hypersonic
programs, Id.
Civilizing JES to Secure Safest Transport Service

Strong support to civilize JES to secure the safest, stall-danger-free,
future private, biz and commercial world fleets, has been first flight
7

testing funded by FAA[Civilizing 1-6]

, USP5782432,[Id.], and supported by
Space America[Additional -.], Aviation Week[Id.] and International Aviation
Conferences in Russia[Id.-5], China[Id.-2], Poland[Id.-3] and Germany[Id.-4].
Misleading Wikipedia Entry on Thrust Vectoring

"The USAF abandoned the (JES) concept as counter-productive
to BVR engagements as (NON-COMBAT, SIMPLEST POST-STALL DEMO
CALLED) Cobra maneuver leaves the aircraft in a state of near zero energy,
having bled off nearly all of its speed in performing the Pugachev's (misleading
too too) Cobra maneuver without gaining any compensating altitude in the
process. Excepting one-on-one engagements, this leaves the aircraft very
vulnerable to both missile and gun attack by a wingman or other hostile, even if
the initial threat overshoots the supermaneuvered aircraft."
See WIKIPEDIA MISLEADING INFORMATION BY:
(1) U.S. JES-F-22,
(2) JES-X-44,
(3) Russian JES Fighter Aircraft Family,
(4) Chinese JES Fighter Aircraft Family,
(5) References 1-3, Debates, Wikipedia misleading entry "Thrust Vectoring".
REFERENCES, Editorials, Prior Art, Reviews and Notes
U.S. AIR FORCE and NATO on Fighter A/C Design impact

U.S., UK, GERMANY, JAPAN
• "Benjamin Gal-Or & Wolfgang Herbst have influenced the direction of fighter aircraft
design."
• “Many of Gal-Or's ideas, and those of Herbst, are now being tested and flown
operationally",
8

• "Their technology will offer new challenges."

• "Solving the inevitable human points problems that will emerge, involve questioning
established doctrine and reaching for innovative and imaginative solution."
https://www.sto.nato.int/publications/.../RTO-TR-015/TR-015-$$ALL.pdf
Editorials
1. Editorial, Gal-Or, B., Jet Engine Steering - (JES) - The new master of
advanced flight control; Civilizing military JES technology maximizes flight
safety and allows pilot recovery when conventional flight control fails to
prevent a crash; Int'l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, 35(2):95-99, DOI: 10.1515/tjj-2018-
9010. May 2018.
2. Editorial, Id., RE-EDUCATING THE JET-ENGINE RESEARCHERS TO STAY
RELEVANT vs. changing uses of small and large jet engines, especially those
anticipated to be used by/in the next generation. Int'l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, 33(2),
July 2016; DOI: 10.1515/tjj-2016-5001.
3. Editorial, Id., FUTURE JET TECHNOLOGIES: JET ENGINES AS PRIME FLIGHT
EFFECTORS. THE FIRST KEY DESIGN RULES. Int'l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, Jul
1999, Dec 2000, Jan 2001 and Jan 2003.
4. Editorial, Id., FUTURE JET TECHNOLOGIES: Joint Design Team induce F-35
run-away costs, delays and performance compromises. Int'l J. Turbo &
Jet Engines, Sep 2011.
5. Editorial, Id., FUTURE JET TECHNOLOGIES: Air, Land and Marine applications
of Jet Engine Steering aka as 3D thrust vectoring flight control or 2D-water TVC of
super-agile boats or super-agile Littoral Combat Ships, [LCS]. Int'l J. Turbo &
Jet Engines, Apr 2011.
6. Editorial, Id., FUTURE JET TECHNOLOGIES: JES for advanced Unmanned
Combat Air Vehicles, [JES-UCAV.]. Int'l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, Mar 2010.
7. Editorial, Id., Global needs for Jet-Engine-Steered (JES) strike drones vs. lack of
updated textbooks to design 6th generation UCLASS due to UCAV failure. Int'l J.
Turbo & Jet Engines, 32(3), Jan 2015. DOI: 10.1515/tjj-2015-1001.
8. Editorial, Id., JET ENGINE STEERING TECHNOLOGY TRANSFERS. Int'l J.
Turbo & Jet Engines, 31(4):277-285, Dec 2014; DOI: 10.1515/tjj-2014-1001.
9

9. Editorial, Id., FUTURE JET TECHNOLOGIES: THE JES-revolution in Air-&-Sea

Propulsion Science and R&D; Int'l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, Jan 2014. DOI:
10.1515/tjj-2014-1000.
10. Editorial, Id., FUTURE JET TECHNOLOGIES: Fleets of low-cost, stealth, jet-
steered drones are designed to fly ahead of fighter aircraft and bombers into
congested regions. Int'l J. Turbo & Jet Engines, Jan 2013.
DEBATES, WIKIPEDIA MISLEADING ENTRY "THRUST VECTORING"
1. Gal-Or, B., Review of the debate and the development of jet engine steering aka
thrust vectoring technology; Journal of Thermal Science, China, Mar 1998.
2. Id., "An Old-New European Debate on Thrust Vectoring", Polskiej Nauki, PRACE
Instytutu Lotnictwa, Poland, 152, pp. 3-8, 1998.
3. Editorial, Id., An Old-New European debate on thrust vectoring, Int'l J. Turbo & Jet
Engines, Jan 1997.
HISTORY
1. Aviation Week & Space Technology: (Gal-Or-TIIT-Team "Flight Tests of Jet-

Powered RPV Fitted With Thrust Vectoring Nozzles”, May 18, p. 21, 1987; May
30, 1987.
2. FLIGHT INT’L same, May 30, 1987.
3. JANE'S ALL THE WORLD'S AIRCRAFT, same, 1987.
PEER REVIEWS AND PATENT
1. Gal-Or, B., FUNDAMENTALS OF CATASTROPHIC FAILURE PREVENTION BY

THRUST VECTORING. AIA Journal of Aircraft, May 1995.
2. Gal-Or, B., Thrust-Vectoring of Converging-Diverging Nozzles, AIAA J. of
Propulsion and Power, 16, 202-206, 2000.
3. Gal-Or, B. "FUNDAMENTALS and SIMILARITY TRANSFORMATIONS OF
VECTORED AIRCRAFT, AIA Journal of Aircraft, Jan 1994.
10

4. Gal-Or, B., MATHEMATIAL PHENOMENOLOGY FOR THRUST VECTORING–

INDUCED AGILITY COMPARISONS, Deficiencies vs. compromises regarding
basic rules for maximization of jet-deflection rates are formulated. AIA Journal of
Aircraft, Mar 1993.
5. Gal-Or, B., THRUST VECTORING [JES] – THEORY, LABORATORY, and FLIGHT
TESTS, AIA Journal of Propulsion and Power, Jan 1993.
6. Gal-Or, B., Lijun Qian and E. Kreindler, Minimum-time maneuvers of thrust-
vectored aircraft; Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, Mar 1998.
7. Gal-Or, Benjamin, Valery Sherbaum and Lichtsinder Michael, U.S. PATENT
No. 5,782,431, RE Civilizing Military Thrust Vectoring Flight Control to save many
lives and prevent much damage by simple, add-on, TV/TR devices, flight tested
and funded by U.S. FAA during 1994-1995, April, 1998.
Civilizing Military JES
1. Gal-Or, B., Catastrophic Failure Prevention (by JES) invited Lecture and Proposal
to NASA, NASA Dryden, June 1995.
2. Gal-Or, B., Civilizing Military Flight Control to Maximize Air Safety, Keynote
Lecture; 3rd Int’l Conf. ISIAF, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, Sept. 2,
1996.
3. Gal-Or, B., Civilizing Military Flight Control to Maximize Air Safety, Opening
Keynote Lecture; 2nd Int’l Seminar on Aeronautics & Education, Warsaw, Poland,
Nov. 25, 1996.
4. Gal-Or, B., Civilizing Military Flight Control to Maximize Air Safety, Keynote
Lecture, Proceedings, 4th Conf., Int’l ISIAF conf., Dresden, Germany, 1999.
5. Gal-Or, B., Civilizing Military Flight Control to Maximize Air Safety, 5th Int´l
Symp. Aero Sci., Moscow, Russia, Plenary Lecture, Proceeding, TsAGI, 1999.
6. Gal-Or, B., "Civilizing Military Thrust Vectoring Flight Control", AEROSPACE
AMERICA, April, 1996.
Stealth Physics Origin
11

Ufimtsev, Pyotr Ya., "Method of edge waves in the physical theory of diffraction,"
Moscow, Russia: Izd-vo. Sov. Radio [Soviet Radio Publishing], 1962, pages 1–243.
JES FUNDED BY USAF (PARTLY CLASSIFIED).
1. Gal-Or, B., “Novel, Post-Stall, (JES) F-15 RPVs: Laboratory and Flight Tests”,
Funded by USAF 1990, 188 pages.
2. Gal-Or, B., “Tailless (JES) Fighters: Theory, Laboratory and Flight Tests”,
USAF, July 15, 1991, 196 pages,
3. Gal-Or, B., “Vectorable Inlets/Nozzles and Tailless Flying Models vs. Pilot’s
Tolerances Affecting Maximum Post-Stall JES Agility”; USAF, 238 pages;
4. Gal-Or, B., “Dynamic Scaling, Pilot v. G-Loads under post-stall Maneuvers
with JES fighters”, Funded series of projects funded by USAF; E.g.:
5. (i) San Antonio, BAFB, 1990, submitted to USAF Colonel J. Tedor team;
6. (ii) “Dynamic Scaling of Prototypes Using Radius of Gyration Method:
Theory, Lab & Flight Tests”, Report to
USAF Capt. J. Wigle (Sep. 30, 1991)
7. (iii) Report to USAF Dr. D. W. Repperger, AL/WPAFB (Sep. 30, 1991),
8. (iv) Report to USAF Col. J. Tedor, Deputy Director, Human Systems Division,
BAFB, TX; USAF Special Project, SPC-91-4003, AF/AFOSR/EOARD,
141 pages;
CLASSIFIED U.S. INDUSTRIES FUNDING OF JES
1. Gal-Or, B., Classified Reports to Lockheed-Martin/General Dynamics, Ft Worth,

TX, via Spence E. Peters, Tel. 817-935-1588, Main: 817-777-2000, E-Mail:
Spence.e.pters@LMCO.com and Dorsett, both have maintained mutual visits during
the longest cooperation programs in which all results were imported to the U.S.
SACOM/JES/STVS technologies were inter alia provided to Lockheed Martin/GD up
to about 1997;
2. Gal-Or, B., Classified Reports to PWA, Manager, Component Technology,
R.E. (Bob) Davis, 1987-1994;
12

3. Gal-Or, B., Classified Reports to General Electric, Aircraft Engines to Don

Dunbar, Ed Rogala and GE VP Krebs. 1987-1988;
4. Gal-Or, B., Agility Benefits of Integrated Aerodynamic & JES Control,
GD/Lockheed-Martin, RFP Ref. TECH-RRJ-JK-0001,
TIIT-TRDF 160-779, 1993-1995, Progress Report No. 2, Feb. 10, 1995
General Reviews and Prior Art

1. Gal-Or, B., “Vectored Propulsion, Supermaneuverability and Robot Aircraft”;
Forward by USAF Chief Scientist. Springer Verlag Book, N.Y. and Heidelberg,
1989, 1991,multiple reprints to present. ISBN 0387-97161-0, 3-540-87161-0,
TL685.3.G23 1989, 629.I34'353-de20, 89-21797. 182 drawings. 237 references to
prior art related to JES conceptual designs, lab and flight testing vs. CFC. Cited by
GOOGLE.
2. Gal-Or, B., "Multiaxis Thrust Vectoring Flight Control Vs Catastrophic Failure

Prevention", Reports to U.S. Dept. of Transportation/FAA, Technical Center,
ACD-210, FAA X88/0/6FA/921000/4104/T1706D, FAA Res. Grant-Award No: 94-G-
24, CFDA, No. 20.108, Dec. 26, 1994, May 30, 1995, with 410 references related to
prior art related to same.
3. Gal-Or, B., Prior ART, International Journal of Turbo and Jet Engines, Vol. 1, pp.
183-194 1984 with 103 references related to prior art on same.
4. Aviation Week & Space Technology: THRUST VECTOR CONTROL EYED FOR
TRANSPORT, Aug. 28, 1995.
5. "DESIGN PROJECT AT SIX UNIVERSITIES": "Steps are being taken by major

companies to take advantage of this". For instance, Citing Int'l J. Turbo & Jet
Engines, Editorials. https://www.researchgate.net/
6. Gal-Or, B., The Fundamental Concepts of Vectored Propulsion, AIAA J.

Propulsion and Power, 6, 747-757, 1990;
7. Gal-Or, B., Maximizing Post-Stall, Thrust-Vectoring Agility and Control Power,

AIAA J. Aircraft, 29, 647-651, 1992;
13

8. Gal-Or, B., Thrust Vectoring: Theory, Laboratory, and Flight Tests, AIAA J.
Propulsion & Power, 9, 51 - 58, 1993
Additional References
to 400+ References in "General Review and PRIOR ART" cited above
1. Gal-Or, B., Lijun Qian and E. Kreindler, Minimum-time maneuvers of thrust-

vectored aircraft; Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, Mar 1998.
2. Gal-Or, Benjamin, Valery Sherbaum and Lichtsinder Michael, U.S. PATENT
No. 5,782,431, RE Civilizing Military Thrust Vectoring Flight Control to save many
lives and prevent much damage by TV/TR add-on kits, flight tested and funded by
U.S. FAA during 1994-1995, April, 1998.
3. Ikaza, D., “TV Nozzle for Military Aircraft.” NATO R&T Organization
Symposium on Active Control Technology for Enhanced Performance Operational
Capabilities of Military Aircraft, Land Vehicles and Sea Vehicles, Braunschweig,
Germany. May 8-11, 2000.
4. Flamm, J. D., Deere, K. A., Mason, M. L., Berrier, B. L., Johnson, S. K.,
“Design Enhancements of the Two-Dimensional, Dual Throat Fluidic Thrust
Vectoring Nozzle Concept.” Third AIAA Flow Control Conference, San
Francisco. Jun. 2006
5. Sparks, S., Michie, S., and Crowther, W., “Development of an integrated
Circulation Control/Fluidic Thrust Vectoring Flight Test Demonstrator.” 1st
International Conference on Innovation & Integration in Aerospace, Queen's
University, Belfast CEIAT-2005-0086.
6. Mason, M. S. and Crowther, W. J. “Fluidic Thrust Vectoring of Low Observable
Aircraft.” CEAS Aerospace Aerodynamic Research Conference, Cambridge,
UK, June 2002.
7. Gu, D.W., Natesan, K., and Postlethwaite, I., "Modeling and Robust Control of
Fluidic Thrust Vectoring and Circulation Control for Unmanned Air Vehicles."
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of
Systems and Control Engineering 222.5 (2008): 333-45.
14

8. Sobester, Andras and Keane, Andy J. “Multi-Objective Optimal Design of

Fluidic Thrust Vectoring Nozzle”. 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis
and Optimization Conference, Portsmouth, USA, September 06 – 08, 2006.
USA, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, pp. 9,8.
9. Friehmelt, Holger. “Thrust Vectoring and Tailless Aircraft Design - Review and
Outlook.” Proceedings of the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference.
San Diego, CA, USA, July 29-31, 1996. P. 420-430
10. Steinhauser, R., Looye, G. and Brieger, O. “Design and Evaluation of Control
Laws for the X-31A with Reduced Vertical Tail” AIAA Guidance, Navigation,
and Control Conference and Exhibit, Providence, Rhode Island. American
Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Aug. 2004.
11. Bosworth, J. T. and Stoliker, P. C., “The X-31A Quasi-Tailless Flight Test
Results” NASA Technical paper Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Gulf-Southwest
Annual Conference, The University of Texas at Arlington, March 21 – 23, 2013.
Copyright © 2013, American Society for Engineering Education 3624, June
1996
12. Alcorn, C. "The X-31 Aircraft: Advances in Aircraft Agility and Performance."
Progress in Aerospace Sciences 32.4 (1996): 377-413.
_______
MARCH 66666, 202O
15

The New Masters of Flight Control - JET ENGINES

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

The New Masters of Flight Control - JET ENGINES

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

NEW MASTERS OF FLIGHT CONTROL, Jet Engines Steering, ("JES") under Rotational Physics, Advantages

Jet Engines Steering

Advantages [USAF 1-4]

Aircraft [General-1] & Stealth-JES Stealth Tailless JES X-44 [Id.]

Combat Jet Drones [Editorial1-10] over Conventional

whereby high-g-load on pilot during WVR-TURNING is diminished if, under

Combat Physics Today

Cited by 80(+) References below & explained and illuminated next

"Speak not in the ears of a fool:

• Jet Engine Steering is not easy to comprehend even by top experts.

experts often react to JES-POST-STALL-SUPER-AGILITY: "Professor,

were preparing to leave an invited HQ-Meeting, unwilling even to hear any

So What is the imported

• BUT MOST IMPORTANT

(a) Safe FLIGHT CONTROL under stall-spin situations

(b) AIR COMBAT STRATEGIES, TACTICS in BVR vs. WVR

(e) PHYSICS of ROTATIONS AROUND combat a/c center-of-gravity.

20 JES-Advantages Over Extant, Rival CFC

Mechanical shape and deflection

Assessment and Debates of Misleading Strategies, Tactics

Various references[Debates 1-3] doubt the effectiveness of JEL especially in

History of First Stealth-JES Flight Testing

The first ever full-scale 1992 flight tests of Stealth-JES-ATF-YF-22,

HISTORY OF JES THE WINNER

Civilizing JES to Secure Safest Transport Service

testing funded by FAA[Civilizing 1-6]

Misleading Wikipedia Entry on Thrust Vectoring

REFERENCES, Editorials, Prior Art, Reviews and Notes

U.S. AIR FORCE and NATO on Fighter A/C Design impact

• "Their technology will offer new challenges."

9. Editorial, Id., FUTURE JET TECHNOLOGIES: THE JES-revolution in Air-&-Sea

DEBATES, WIKIPEDIA MISLEADING ENTRY "THRUST VECTORING"

1. Aviation Week & Space Technology: (Gal-Or-TIIT-Team "Flight Tests of Jet-

PEER REVIEWS AND PATENT

1. Gal-Or, B., FUNDAMENTALS OF CATASTROPHIC FAILURE PREVENTION BY

4. Gal-Or, B., MATHEMATIAL PHENOMENOLOGY FOR THRUST VECTORING–

Civilizing Military JES

Stealth Physics Origin

JES FUNDED BY USAF (PARTLY CLASSIFIED).

CLASSIFIED U.S. INDUSTRIES FUNDING OF JES

1. Gal-Or, B., Classified Reports to Lockheed-Martin/General Dynamics, Ft Worth,

3. Gal-Or, B., Classified Reports to General Electric, Aircraft Engines to Don

General Reviews and Prior Art

2. Gal-Or, B., "Multiaxis Thrust Vectoring Flight Control Vs Catastrophic Failure

5. "DESIGN PROJECT AT SIX UNIVERSITIES": "Steps are being taken by major

6. Gal-Or, B., The Fundamental Concepts of Vectored Propulsion, AIAA J.

7. Gal-Or, B., Maximizing Post-Stall, Thrust-Vectoring Agility and Control Power,

1. Gal-Or, B., Lijun Qian and E. Kreindler, Minimum-time maneuvers of thrust-

8. Sobester, Andras and Keane, Andy J. “Multi-Objective Optimal Design of

MARCH 66666, 202O

You might also like