236 6, POWER FLOW ANALYSIS
Line impedances converted to admittances are 4n2 = 10 — j20, y13 = 10 — 430,
and ys = 16 — 732, This results in the bus admittance matrix
Yous
10+ 520 26-552 -16 + 532
20~ 50 ~10+j20 ~10 +530
10+ 730 -16-+532 26 — j62
Converting the bus admittance matrix to potar form with angles in radian yields
22.3000822.U844 58.13777Z—1.1071 — 35.7770922.0344
53.85165/—1.9029 22.36068/2.0344 —31.62278/1.8925 i
Yous =
31.6227821.8925 35.7770922.034467.23095/—1.1737
From (6.52) and (6.53), the expressions for real power at bus 2 and 3 and the
reactive power at bus 2 are
Pa = |ValIVill¥a1| cos (821 — 52 + 51) + [V2 |I¥a| cos 2a +
IValVall¥as] cos(B2s — 52 + 6)
Ps = |Val[Vill¥s1l cos(Oa1 — 52 + 61) + [Val]Vall¥sa] c0s(8s2 —
5a + 62) + |V3I¥aa| cos O33
Qa = ~|VallVill¥ai|sin(02y — 53 + 64) ~ [V2 I|¥on| sin Ong —
[ValIVall¥2s] sin(02a — 62 + 63)
Elements of the Jacobian matrix are obtained by taking partial derivatives of the
above equations with respect to 6, 53 and |Val
OP,
Big = IWallVall¥ol sin(Onn ~ b+ 64) + IVlIValI¥al
ssin(623 — 63 + ds)
Pe = —vilva¢at sin tay ~ By +63)
OP,
Bfve| ~ Vil¥ash xs(0a1 ~ b+ ds) + 2IVallVal cos Oa +
Wallis cca(Oen~ ba +6)
ar,
Big, = ~WallVally2|sin(¢s2 — 05 + d2)
ai
Fee = WAV sn ~ +65) + eV
sin(@32 — 55 + 6.)
SP = W5llVnl cos en — fy +63)
aval6.10, NEWTON-RAPHSONPOWER FLOW SOLUTION 237
a
Qt = hv cola — fa -+ 51) + Walla
c0s(Bag — 52 + 6s)
22 «ivan cola ~ +5)
Q2 _ _ _ ae
al —|Vil|¥au| sin (G21 — 52 + 61) — 2|Vel|¥oo| sin Be
[Vall¥as| sin(@23 ~ 52 + 63)
‘The load and generation expressed in per units are
woh _ _ (400 + 5250) 8
Spt = = 40-925 po
ch _ 200
Poh = 5 = 2.0 pu
The slack bus voltage is Vj — 1.0520 pu, and the bus 3 voltage magnitude is
[Val = 1.04 pu. Starting with an initial estimate of [VA] = 1.0, 6? = 0.0, and
6{°) = 0.0, the power residuals are computed from (6.63) and (6.64)
APL = pst — pl = 4.0 — (-1.14) = -2.8600
APO) = pyr. PO = (0.5616) = 1.4384
QL) = Q3% — QW? = -2.5 — (-2.28) = -0.2200
Evaluating the elements of the Jacobian matrix with the initial estimate, the set of
linear equations in the fist iteration becomes
2.8600 54.28000 —33.28000 24.86000] [ agi
1.4384 | = | -33.28000 66.0400 -16.64000 | | Aa
0.2200 27.4000 16.6400 49.7200 | | alv{
Obtaining the solution of the above matrix equation, the new bus voltages in the
first iteration are
60) = -0.045263 62) = 0+ (—0.045263) = -0.045263
AG = 0.007718 68) = 0+ (-0.007718) = —0.007718
AV: = 0.020518 vf) = 1+ (0.020548) — 0.97046
Voltage phase angles are in radians. For the second iteration, we have
0.099218, 1.724675 —31.765618 2.302567 ] [ vg)
0.021715 | = | —32.981642 65.656383 -15.379086 a6)
0.050914 —28.538577 17.402838 48.103580 | | Alvs)238 6, POWER FLOW ANALYSIS
0.001795 6
56 = —0,000985 =
Aly = 0.001767 |v?)
For the third iteration, we have
0.045263 + (0.001795) = -0.04706
0.007718 + (—0.000985) = -0.00870
0.973451 + (0.001767) = 0.971684
—0.000216 51.595701 —31.693866 —21.147447 Ase)
0.000038 | = | -32.933865 65.597585 -15.351628 | | As”)
-o.o0n43 | | oxsasons 17 208092 —arosas7o | | lv?
and
46% = —0.000038 0.047058 + (—0.0000038) = —0.04706
46,” = —0.0000024 9000024) = U.008705
Alvs?| = -0.0000044 —_|v{| = 0.971684 1 ( 0.000044) = 0.97168
The solution converges in 3 iterations with a maximum power mismatch of 2.5 x
10~4 with Vo = 0.97168/—2.696° and V; = 1.04/—0.4988°. From (6.52) and
(6.53), the expressions for reactive power at bus 3 and the slack bus real and reac-
tive powers are
Qs = —|VallVill¥ax] sin(O51 ~ 63 + 61) ~ |Val|Vall¥sal
sin(8a2 — 53 + 52) — |Vs[?|¥as| sin O33
Pi = [MAP*I¥} cos #11 + |VallVolI¥ial co5(012 ~ 5; + 82) + IMilIVsl
[¥is|eos(01s ~ 5 + 53)
IVil?[¥i4| sin Ona ~ [V4 IValf¥inl sin(Oyo — 64 + 52) — IVillVal
MMislsin(@is — 61 + 43)
Upon substitution, we have
Qo ~ 14617 pu
P= 2.1842 pu
Qi = 1.4085 pu
Finally, the line flows are calculated in the same manner as the line flow calcula
tions in the Gauss-Seidel method described in Example 6.7, and the power flow