You are on page 1of 7

Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine 6 (2013) 267–272 267

DOI 10.3233/NPM-1370213
IOS Press

Case Report

Cardiogenic shock as the initial presentation


of neonatal systemic hypertension
N. Xiaoa,∗ , A. Tandonb , S. Goldsteina and A. Lortsb
a Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
b The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA

Received 09 January 2013


Revised 23 April 2013
Accepted 16 July 2013

Abstract. Neonatal systemic hypertension is an underappreciated etiology of cardiac failure. We present a series of three neonates
who presented in cardiogenic shock secondary to severe hypertension, recognized after initial resuscitation efforts. Although
the underlying etiology of the hypertension varied, all three patients had improved hemodynamics after their blood pressure was
controlled. These cases suggest that neonates presenting in cardiogenic shock with hypertension, and without structural heart
disease, may benefit from a thorough renal evaluation and institution of anti-hypertensive therapy.

Keywords: Infant, neonate, cardiogenic shock, hypertension

1. Introduction 2. Patient presentation

Cardiogenic shock in infancy is usually the result of 2.1. Case 1


congenital, structural heart disease (specifically left-
sided obstructive lesions), a familial myocardial abnor- A term female newborn with an uneventful deliv-
mality, myocarditis, or a metabolic syndrome. Severe ery was transferred to the nursery on day of life 1
systemic hypertension is a rare but important cause of (DOL 1) for poor feeding; by DOL 3 she appeared pale,
cardiac failure [1–3]. When an infant presents in car- mottled, developed prolonged capillary refill, tachycar-
diogenic shock with an echocardiogram negative for dia, tachypnea, and fatigued quickly with feeds. Her
structural heart disease, secondary hypertension must systolic blood pressures (SBP) were 110–120 mmHg,
be ruled out after initial stabilization. A thorough diag- measured with oscillometric blood pressure cuff.
nostic workup and timely management of systemic Normal SBP range for term infant at DOL 3 is
hypertension are essential to minimize the effects of 65–89 mmHg [4]. She had cultures drawn and antibi-
increased afterload on the dysfunctional myocardium. otics were started. On DOL 5 she was acidotic
We describe the clinical course, diagnostic workup and transferred to our neonatal intensive care unit
and long term follow-up of three neonatal cases where (NICU). This patient had not had an umbilical line.
hypertension led to cardiogenic shock. On admission, she was gray and mottled, had diffi-
cult to palpate pulses, and had poor activity. She had
∗ Corresponding
increased respiratory effort, with a respiratory rate of
author: Dr. Nianzhou Xiao, Pediatric Nephrol-
ogy and Hypertension, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical
50 breaths per minute, heart rate of 180 beats per
Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue – S215, Cincinnati, 45229 OH, USA. minute, blood pressure of 114/85, and oxygen satu-
Tel.: +1 513 636 8647; E-mail: Nianzhou.Xiao@cchmc.org. ration 100% on room air. There were no murmurs or

1934-5798/13/$27.50 © 2013 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved
268 N. Xiao et al. / Cardiogenic shock as the initial presentation of neonatal systemic hypertension

140 Renin=388
Renin=62.8 BNP=406
Aldosterone=320
120 BNP=8737
Blood pressure (mmHg)

100

80

60

40
Nitroprusside
Enalaprilat
20
Enalapril
Enoxaparin
0
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
DOL
SBP median DBP median

Fig. 1. Sequence of blood pressure, antihypertensive therapy, and important lab results for case 1. BNP, brain natriuretic peptide. DOL, day of
life. SBP, systolic blood pressure. DBP, diastolic blood pressure.

gallops. An echocardiogram demonstrated normal car- anti-phospholipid antibody profile and normal genetic
diac anatomy and an unobstructed aortic arch but poor polymorphism, which includes factor V Leiden 1691,
biventricular systolic function (left ventricular shorten- prothrombin 20210, MTHFR 677, MTHFR 1298, and
ing fraction of 11%), which prompted a transfer to our PAI-1 (5G/4G). Therapeutic enoxaparin was initiated
cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). The brain natri- on DOL 8. A CT angiogram done on DOL 9 confirmed
uretic peptide (BNP) level, a marker of myocardial a right renal artery embolism/thrombosis, and a small
dysfunction, was >8737 pg/mL (normal <100 pg/mL); right kidney infarct. After three days of enoxaparin
and her serum lactate was elevated to 5.4 mmol/L (nor- treatment, her blood pressure improved. The renin
mal <1.5 mmol/l). All other laboratory values were activity level decreased to 62.8 ng/mL/hr and BNP
within normal limits; specifically, a blood urea nitro- level checked on DOL 15 decreased to 406 pg/mL. A
gen level (BUN) of 8 mg/dL and serum creatinine renal ultrasound on DOL 18 showed increased blood
level of 0.7 mg/dL (likely reflecting maternal creatinine flow within the right kidney. The infant’s BP persis-
levels). tently improved and she was discharged home on oral
Once intubated and stabilized, she had signifi- enalapril and subcutaneous enoxaparin on DOL 20.
cant hypertension (Fig. 1) despite increasing doses She has been followed for 6 months. An echocardio-
of a nitroprusside infusion from 0.5 mcg/kg/min to gram at 3 months of age revealed normal bilateral
2 mcg/kg/min. Intravenous enalaprilat (highest dose: ventricular function (Table 1).
20 mcg/kg per dose every six hours) was added to the
antihypertensive regimen on DOL 6. Both a peripheral 2.2. Case 2
plasma renin activity measurement and aldosterone
level (not available until later) collected on DOL 6 were A term female presented on DOL 34 after two days
elevated at 388 ng/mL/hr (normal: 2.0–35.0 ng/mL/hr) of newly developed poor feeding and increased respi-
and 320 ng/dL (normal: 5.0–132.0 ng/dL), respec- ratory distress at home. In the emergency department,
tively. Renal ultrasound showed a right kidney she was in cardiogenic shock with poor respiratory
measuring 4.1 cm and a left kidney measuring 4.8 cm. effort and poor perfusion. Heart rate was 158 beats
There was no right renal arterial waveform so a right per minute, respiratory rate was 34 breaths per minute
renal arterial thrombosis was suspected. The infant and and BP was 73/59 mmHg (normal range for age is
mother had an extensive thrombophilia work up, which 75–95/37–55 mmHg) [4], higher than expected given
revealed a normal thrombotic profile for age, negative clinical status. Four extremity blood pressures were
N. Xiao et al. / Cardiogenic shock as the initial presentation of neonatal systemic hypertension 269

Table 1

Initial BP improved Discharge or after


Case 1
BUN (5–17 mg/dL) 8 12 19
Creatinine (age dependent) 0.7 0.4 0.5
Renin (newborn: 2.0–35.0 ng/mL/hr; 388 62.8 NA
1–12 months: 2.4–37.0 ng/mL/hr)
Aldosterone (5.0–132.0 ng/dL) 320 NA NA
Lactate (0.7–2.1 mmol/l) 5.4 1 1.4
BNP (<100 pg/ml) 8737 406 NA
SF (35–45%) 11 35 41
MR (−) + + +
Hepatomegaly (−) +++ ++ –
Case 2
BUN (5–17 mg/dL) 12 10 12
Creatinine (age dependent) 0.3 0.3 0.2
Renin (newborn: 2.0–35.0 ng/mL/hr; NA NA NA
1–12 months: 2.4–37.0 ng/mL/hr)
Aldosterone (5.0–132.0 ng/dL) NA NA NA
Lactate (0.7–2.1 mmol/l) 11.4 0.9 1.4
BNP (<100 pg/ml) NA 7923 NA
SF (35–45%) NA 36 38
MR (−) +++ ++ ++
Hepatomegaly (−) ++ + –
Case 3
BUN (5–17 mg/dL) 13 3 9
Creatinine (age dependent) 0.6 0.3 0.3
Renin (newborn: 2.0–35.0 ng/mL/hr; NA 39.2 NA
1–12 months: 2.4–37.0 ng/mL/hr)
Aldosterone (5.0–132.0 ng/dL) NA 58.2 NA
Lactate (0.7–2.1 mmol/l) 14.9 1.3 1.1
BNP (<100 pg/ml) 13567 2919 59
SF (35–45%) 33 39 41
MR (−) +++ ++ +
Hepatomegaly (−) +++ ++ –

concordant. Oxygen saturations were in the low 80% showed a decrease in mitral regurgitation with normal
range. The cardiac examination found a new III/VI right and left ventricular systolic function. She was
systolic regurgitant murmur heard best over the apex. discharged home on enalapril after 7 days of hospital-
She was intubated emergently, given a fluid bolus, ization (DOL 40).
and admitted to the CICU. A bedside echocardiogram During follow up, her BP has remained high but is
showed moderate to severe mitral regurgitation with controlled with titration of enalapril. Her most recent
left atrial and left ventricular dilation, an unobstructed echocardiogram, one year after the event, showed a
aortic arch, mildly depressed biventricular systolic significant decrease in the left ventricular size and left
function, and normal coronaries. Her BP trended up atrial size with normal systolic function. The etiology
to 95/58 mmHg as she was stabilized (Fig. 2). Renal of her hypertension remains unknown.
ultrasound with Doppler was unremarkable. Kidney
function testing showed normal BUN of 12 mg/dL 2.3. Case 3
and a creatinine of 0.3 mg/dL. Enalapril was initi-
ated to further reduce afterload and to achieve optimal A term female presented to the emergency depart-
blood pressure control. To augment her blood pres- ment (ED) on DOL 9 with poor perfusion and a
sure control she received a nitroprusside infusion for decrease in activity level. The pregnancy, delivery and
24 hours from DOL 35 to DOL 36, and two doses of immediate post-partum period were all uncomplicated.
amlodipine. She was successfully extubated three days In the ED, she was unresponsive, with mottled skin,
after admission. A repeat echocardiogram on DOL 39 poor pulses and poor respiratory effort. The respira-
270 N. Xiao et al. / Cardiogenic shock as the initial presentation of neonatal systemic hypertension

120
BNP=7923

100
Blood pressure (mmHg)

80

60

40

Nitroprusside
20 Enalapril
Amlodipine

0
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 DOL
SBP median DBP median

Fig. 2. Sequence of blood pressure, antihypertensive therapy, and important lab results for case 2. BNP, brain natriuretic peptide. DOL, day of
life. SBP, systolic blood pressure. DBP, diastolic blood pressure.

160
Renin=39.2
BNP=13597 BNP=59
Aldosterone=58.2
140
BNP=2919
Blood pressure (mmHg)

120

100

80

60

40
Nitroprusside
20 Captopril Enalapril
Nicardipine
Amlodipine
0
9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25
DOL
SBP median DBP median

Fig. 3. Sequence of blood pressure, antihypertensive therapy, and important lab results for case 3. BNP, brain natriuretic peptide. DOL, day of
life. SBP, systolic blood pressure. DBP, diastolic blood pressure.

tory rate was 26 breaths per minute, heart rate was 196 (Fig. 3). Her BNP was elevated at 13567 pg/mL. Initial
beats per minute and blood pressure was 64/56 mmHg echocardiogram showed severe mitral regurgitation
(normal range for age is 68–88/41–59 mmHg) [4]. with a dilated left atrium, low normal biventricular
Physical exam revealed grade II-III/VI systolic regur- systolic function, widely patent aortic arch and bilat-
gitant murmur and severe hepatomegaly. She was eral pleural effusions. The prostaglandin infusion was
intubated emergently, given a 10 mL/kg normal saline discontinued. To control her hypertension, an intravas-
bolus, and started on a prostaglandin infusion. She cular nitroprusside infusion (between 0.5 mcg/kg/min
quickly responded with better perfusion. One hour to 2 mcg/kg/min) was started and subsequently cap-
later, however, her blood pressure elevated to 116/94 topril was prescribed. Renal Doppler ultrasound
N. Xiao et al. / Cardiogenic shock as the initial presentation of neonatal systemic hypertension 271

showed patent main renal arteries and main renal ing a thorough evaluation for the causes of systemic
veins bilaterally. Blood pressures stayed above 100/60 hypertension in neonates.
until a nicardipine drip (between 0.4 mcg/kg/min Neonates that present poorly perfused due to a
to 0.5 mcg/kg/min) was started on DOL 13. She cardiac problem are usually hypotensive and require
was converted to an oral anti-hypertensive regimen vasoconstrictors to establish adequate blood pressure.
including amlodipine and enalapril, and both the nitro- These three infants, however, had normal blood pres-
prusside and nicardipine infusions were weaned off by sure or were hypertensive when they were in shock and
DOL 20 with blood pressures of 80’s/40’s. On DOL after their initial resuscitation they all became hyper-
25, BNP normalized to 59 pg/mL. Repeat echocardio- tensive. Interestingly, their hypertension (more obvi-
gram showed her improved mitral regurgitation and ous in cases 2 and 3) was not responsive to vasodilators.
systolic function had normalized. The pleural effusions Instead, they required angiotensin-converting enzyme
and hepatomegaly had resolved. The patient was dis- (ACE) inhibition for hypertension management, and
charged home on enalapril with well controlled blood with better blood pressure control the severity of
pressures. their mitral regurgitation and/or systolic dysfunction
Her serum creatinine level was 0.3–0.4 and remained improved. In case 1, enoxaparin was added about 28
stable 6 months later. A renal ultrasound at 1 year of age hours after the initiation of enalaprilat so it is hard to
remained normal, and a repeat echocardiogram about 1 argue blood pressure improvement was mainly due to
year after the event showed continued improvement of adding enalaprilat. However, patient’s BP continued
her mitral regurgitation. The child remains on enalapril to decrease and remained well controlled by enalapril
to ensure blood pressure control. when nitroprusside was discontinued on DOL 11.
These cases illustrate that systemic hypertension can
cause cardiogenic shock, and that a complete evalu-
3. Discussion ation and the timely institution of anti-hypertensives
should be considered in the neonatal patient with
The incidence of hypertension has been reported to hypertension and systolic dysfunction or mitral regur-
range from 0.2–0.3% of all neonates [5], and is most gitation. Elevated blood pressures in the neonate
common in preterm infants in NICUs with multiple should not be dismissed without further evaluation.
co-morbidities. Our three patients were all presumed The initial renal evaluation should include palpation of
to be healthy term infants until they presented in car- femoral pulses, serum electrolytes, serum creatinine,
diogenic shock at DOL 4, 35, and 9, respectively. In plasma renin activity measurement, serum aldosterone
each case, hypertension became evident quickly after level, urinalysis and a Doppler renal ultrasound in addi-
the start of resuscitation. The initial blood pressure tion to an echocardiogram and cardiac biomarkers such
was measured with oscillometric blood pressure cuff, as BNP.
and later via both constant peripheral arterial line and The laboratory tests recommended can be are diffi-
intermittent oscillometric method. BP measurements cult to interpret in newborns. Koch and Singer reported
from the two methods matched well. Echocardiograms that plasma BNP decreases during the first 2 week
were done to rule out significant structural heart dis- of life by almost 5 folds [6]. Because individual val-
ease, specifically left-sided obstructive cardiac lesions, ues vary greatly, BNP values less than 100 pg/ml are
and to further define the cardiac phenotype. At pre- usually taken as normal. In our presented cases, ini-
sentation, all three patients had evidence of cardiac tial BNP values were significantly elevated by both
dysfunction with variable left ventricular dimensions standards. Renin activity varies with age and patient’s
and mitral valve annulus dilation leading to valvular position. For infants, the reference values were avail-
regurgitation. The variation in chamber enlargement is able for supine position only [7]: the normal range
due to alterations in preload, which correlates with the for 1–7 days is 2.0–35.0 ng/mL/hr; for 1–12 months
length of time that the newborn had been in low car- is 2.4–37.0 ng/mL/hr. The initial renin activity for case
diac output. Unlike the patients in the Patterson et al 1 was significantly elevated (388 ng/mL/hr) which is
study our patients did not have dilated aortic roots when consistent with the underlining causes of hyperten-
compared to normal controls [1]. In our cases there sion: renal arterial thrombosis. If renin activity is
was no evidence of structural heart disease resulting in noticed to be significantly elevated during hyperten-
a workup for the etiology of cardiac collapse, includ- sion workup, etiologies limiting kidney blood supply
272 N. Xiao et al. / Cardiogenic shock as the initial presentation of neonatal systemic hypertension

(such as arterial stenosis and thrombosis) should be References


strongly suspected.
Renal ultrasound may help to narrow the differential [1] Peterson AL, Frommelt PC, Mussatto K. Presentation and
echocardiographic markers of neonatal hypertensive cardiomy-
diagnosis and guide hypertension management before
opathy. Pediatrics 2006;118(3):e782-5.
other results are available. Hypertension due to high [2] Hawkins KC, Watson AR, Rutter N. Neonatal hypertension
renin levels usually responds to ACE inhibitors, but and cardiac failure. Eur J Pediatr 1995;154(2):148-9.
this class of drugs is contraindicated in cases of bilat- [3] Kovacikova L, Kunovsky P, Skrak P, Haviar D, Martanovic P.
Renovascular hypertension in infant presenting with cardio-
eral renal arterial stenosis. In all three cases, renal genic shock. Pediatr Emerg Care 2005;21(5):322-4.
ultrasound ruled out bilateral renal arterial obstruc- [4] Nuntnarumit P, Yang W, Bada-Ellzey HS. Blood pressure mea-
tion, thus ACE inhibitors could be cautiously used surements in the newborn. Clin Perinatol 1999;26(4):981-96,
to achieve optimal BP control. In case 1, renal ultra- x.
[5] Dionne JM, Abitbol CL, Flynn JT. Hypertension in infancy:
sound with Doppler identified the right renal arterial Diagnosis, management and outcome. Pediatr Nephrol
thrombosis and anti-coagulation was added to treat the 2012;27(1):17-32.
underlying cause and prevent further kidney damage. [6] Koch A, Singer H. Normal values of B type natriuretic peptide
We suggest that systemic hypertension associated car- in infants, children, and adolescents. Heart 2003;89(8):875-8.
[7] Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Border B, Tietz NW. Tietz fundamen-
diogenic shock can be reversed with adequate blood tals of clinical chemistry. 5th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders;
pressure control. 2001. xxv, p. 1091.

Financial disclosure statement

The authors have no financial relationships or con-


flicts of interest relevant to this article.
Copyright of Journal of Neonatal -- Perinatal Medicine is the property of IOS Press and its
content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the
copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email
articles for individual use.

You might also like