You are on page 1of 7
(COURSE TITLE: PUBLIC CORPORATION COURSE CREDIT: 2units PRE-REQUISITES Constitutional Law 1 COURSE DESCRIPTION: ‘This 2-unit course is'a branch of Political Law. Ie focuses on the effects of change in the operations and capabilities of the local government units vis-a-vis the national government to the unitary system of inter-governmental relations in the Philippines “Emphasis will be the evolution of autonomy, decentralization and devolution of powers to the local government and the deconcentration of functions of national offices to the local government units. METHODOLOGY: ‘The class will be conducted mainly through recitations and examinations. COURSE REQUIREMENTS: Readings and Assignments. You are éxpected to be familiar with the assigned. readings on a week-to-week basis and must be prepared to participate actively in class discussions, Supplementary readings and assignments will be given every now and then to augment the schedule of Topics and Readings and to ensure a better understanding of specific topic. Recitation, You will be called to recite or lead the discussion of a scheduled topic uring the term. You are expected to demonstrate during recitation both knowledge of the assigned readings and ability to express yourself convincingly. Mid-term/Final Examinations. You will be given two major examinations In this course, Both will allow you to display your knawledge and familiarity to think critically and logically GRADING SYSTEM: Your grade in the course will be determined on the basis of class standing (30%), the miciterm examination (30%), and the final examination (40%). COURSE OUTLINE: GENERAL PRINCIPLES: ‘A. Corporation, Public Corporation, Municipal Corporation, Local Government definitions, classes, purpose, elements, history, nature B. Types of local government = de jure/de facto municipal corporations, requisites ©, Validity of incorporation and corporate existence = general rule; exceptions Paget of? CONSITUTIONAL BASIS. Reference: 1987 Philippine Constitution A.State Poliey, Article Il, Section 25, B. Local Government, Art. X, Secs. 1-25 C.Statutes D, Cases = RA 7924, Constituting the MMDA. 23 May RA 6734, Organic Act for the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao = San juan v CSC 196 SCRA 69 = Limbona v Conte Mangelin, 170 SCRA 786 + Abbas v Comelec, 179 SCRA 287 = Ordillo v Comelec, 192 SCRA100 = MMDA v Bel AirVillage Association, 328 SCRA 836 E, Principles of Local Autonomy 1. Principle of Local Authority (Section 25, Article IL and Section 2, Articte X ofthe 1987 Constitution) Cases: Basco v, PAGCOR (6.8. No. 91649, May 14,1991) Lina v Pano (G.R, No. 129093, August 30, 2001) Limbona v. Mangelin (G.R. No. 80391, February 28, 1989) Disomangeop v. Datumanong (G.R. No, 149848, 25 November 2004) Batangas CATV, Inc. v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 138810, 29 September 2004) 2. Power ofthe President over LGUs (Sec. 4, Art. X 1987 Constitution) Cases: Judge Dadole v. Commission on Audit (GR. No. 125350, December 3, 2002) Pimentel v, Aguirre, et al. (G.R. No, 132988, July 19, 2000), in relation to Sees, 284-294, LGC. Province of Batangas v, Romulo (GR. No. 152774, 27 May 2004) ACORD v. Zamora (G.R. No. 144256, 08 June 2005) Kida v, Senate ofthe Philippines (G.R. No, 196271, 18 October 2011; Resolution dated 26 February 2012) Gov. Vilafuerte, Jr. and Prov. of Camsur v, Robredo, GR. No, 195390, 10 December 2014 F, Muniepal Corporations (Local Government Units [LGUS}) 1. Blements 2. Dual Nature and Functions 3. Municipal Corporations/LGUs in the Philippines (Section 1, Article X, Constitution) Page 2007 6G, Creation and Alteration of Municipal Corporations/LGUS Cases: Sema v. Comelec (G.R. No, 177597, 16 July 2008) League of Cities ofthe Philippines v. Comelec (6.2. No. 176951, 18 November 2008; 21 December 2009; 24 August 2010; and 15 February 2011) Navarro v. Ermita, G.R. No, 180050, 10 February 2010 and Resolution dated 12 April 2014; Min. Res. G.R. No. 180050, Navarro v, Executive Secretary Ermita, September 11, 2022 Miranda v, Aguirce (G.R. No, 133064, 16 September 1999) Samson v. Aguirre (G.R. No. 133076, 22 September 1999) Alvarez v, Guingona (G.R. No. 118303, 31 January 1996) Mariano v. COMELEC (G.R. No, 118577, 07 March 1995) Cawaling Jr. v. COMELEC (G.R, No, 146319, October 26, 2001) ‘Aquino v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 189793, 07 April 2010) Tan v, COMELEG (G.R, No, 73155, 11 July 1986) H, ‘The Local Government Code, as amended 1. Bffectivity 2, Rules of Interpretation M1, General Powers and Attribute of LGUs A. Sources of Powers B. Governmental Powers 1. Police power aka General Welfare Clause (Sec. 16, LGC) Cases: Dela Cruz v. Paras (G.R, No, 1+42571-72, 25 July 1983) Binay v. Domingo (G.&, No. 92389, 11 September 1991) ‘Tano v, Socrates (G.R. No, 110249, 21 August 1997) White Light Corp. v. City of Manila (GR, No. 122846, 20 January 2009) Social ustice Society v. Atienza (G.R. No, 156052, February 13, 2008; see Social Justice Society (}S) Officers v. Lim/ Atienza (GR, No, 187836, 25 November 2014) 2, Taxing Power (ef, Local Taxation: Sec. 5-7, Art. X, Constitution; Secs. 128- 196, LGC) Cases: Manila International Airport Authority v. Court of Appeals (GR. No. 155650, 20 July 2006) Mactin Cebu International Airport Authority v. Marcases (G.R. No, 120082, 11 September 1996) City Government of Quezon City v. Bayan Telecommunications, Ine. (GR. No, 162015, 06 March 2006) Drilon. Lim (GR No. 112497, 04 August 1994) Batangas City v, Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corp, (G.R. No, 187631, 08 July 2018) Page 3 of 7 eminent Domain (Sec.19, LGC; Sec.9, Article I, Constiation; Rule 97, Rules of Court) Cases: ity Gov. of Quezon City v. Erieta (G.R. No. 34915, 24 June 1983) City of Cebu v. Spouses Apolonio (G.R. No, 142971, 07 May 2002) Republic v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No, 146587, 02 July 2002) Reclassification of Lands Cases: Department of Agrarian Reform v. Saranggani Agricultural Co, Inc. (GR. No, 165547, 24 January 2007) Closure and Opening of Roads (See, 21, LGC) Cases: Sangalang v, Intermediate Appellate Court (G.R. No, 71169, 25 August 1989) MMDA., Bel Air Village Assoc. Inc (GR. No, 135962, 27 March 2000) Lucena Grand Central Terminal, Ine v,JAC Liner, Inc. (G.R.No. 148339, 23, February 2005) Legislative Power (a) Requisites for valid ordinance Cases: City of Manila v. Laguio, jr. (GR. No, 118127, 12 April 2005) Social Justice Society v. Atienza (GR. No, 156052, 13 Feb. 2008) (b) Local initiative referendum . Authority over Police Units Section 6, Article XVI of the 1987 Constitution }. Corporate Powers A. Tohave continuous succession in its corporate name 8, Tosueand be sued 6. Tohave and use a corporate seal D. Toacquire and convey real or personal property E, Toenter into contracts, (2) Requisites (b) Ukra vires contracts Municipal Liability A. Section 24, RA No. 7160 B. Liability for violation of law, contract, tore G. Doctrine oFimplied municipal ability Page 4 of 7 IIL _Local Officials ‘A. Provisions applicable to Elective and Appointive Local Officials 1. Prohibited Business and Pecuniary Interest 2, Practice of Profession Cases: Republic of the Philippines v. Rambuyong (G.R. No, 167810, 04 October 2010) Catu v. Rellosa (A.C, No, 5738, 19 February 2008) 3. Prohibition Against Appointment Case: Flores v, Drilon (G.R. No, 104732, 22 June 1993) B. Elective Local Officials 1, Qualifications /disqualifications Jalosjos v, Comelec (GR. Nos, 193237 /193536, 09 October 2012) Jalosjos v. Comelec (G.R. No. 205033, 18 June 2013) Aratea v. Comelec (G.R. No. 195229, 09 October 2012) Japon v. Comelec (GR. No, 180088, 19 January 2009) Sobejana:Condon v. Comelee (C.R, No; 198742, 10 August 2012) CCorodora v, Comelee (G.R, No. 176947, 19 February 2008) 2, Manner and Date of Election Kida v, Senate of the Philippines (supra) 3, Term of Office Abundo v. Commission on Elections (G.R, No, 201716, 08 January 2013) Borja v, Comelec (GR, No. 133495, 03 September 1998) Aldovino v, Comelec (6. No. 184836, 23 December 2009) Adiormeo v. Comelec (G.R. No. 147927, 04 February 2002) Socrates v. Comelec (6.8. No. 154512, 12 Noveiber 2002) Latasa V, Comelec (6.8. No. 154829, 10 December 2003) Ongy. Alegre (G.R, No, 163295, 23 Jamuary 2006) Mendoza v. Comelec (6.8. No, 149736, 17 December 2002) Rivera liv, Comelec (GR, No, 167591, 09 May 2007) Dizon v, Comelec (GR. No. 182088, 30 January 2009) Bolos, Jr. v, Comelec (G.R, No, 184082, 17 March 2009) Comelec v. Crux (G.R, No. 186616, 20 November 2009) 4, Rules on Succession ‘Talaga v. Comelec (6.8. No. 196804, 09 October 2012) Gamboa v, Aguirre (G.R. No, 134213, 20 July 1999) Recall 6. Resignation Page 5 of7 7. Discipline (a) Grounds (b) jurisdiction (6) Preventive suspension (@) Removal (@) Administrative appeal Disciplinary Actions ‘A, Blective Local Officials (Sees, 60-68) Cases: ‘Ganzon v, Court of Appeals (200 SCRA 271) Joson v, Torres (290 SCRA 279) Salalima v. Guingona (257 SCRA 55) Berces v, Executive Secretary (241 SCRA S39) Malinao v, Reyes (256 SCRA 616) Sanggunian Baranggay of Don Mariano Marcos v. Martinez (GR. No, 170626, March 3, 2008) Lingating v. COMELEC (G.R. No, 153478, November 13, 2002) B. Sees, 13,21, and 24, RA. 6770 Cases: Hagad v. Gozo-Dadole (G.R. No, 108072, December 12, 1995) Office of the Ombudsman v. Rodriguez (G.R. No. 172700, uly 23, 2010) ©. $ee13, RA.3019 as 2008) ralaga, |r. v. Sandiganbayan (G.R. No. 169888, November 11, D. Sees, 51 and $2, Subtitle A Title |, Book V of Executive Order No. 292, or the Administrative Code of 1987 (9 Docerine of conconation Aguinaldo v. Santos (G.R, No, 94115, 21 August 1992) Salumbines, jr. v. Office of the Ombudsman (G.R. No. 180917, 23 April 2010) Ombudsman Carpio-Morales v. CA and Binay (G.R. Nos, 217126-27, 10 November 2015) Appointive Local Officials 4, Responsibility for Human Resources and Development 2. Discipline (Secs. 84-88, LGC) Cases: De Rama v, CA (G.R. No, 131136, February 28, 2001) Plaza v. CA (G.8. No. 138464, january 18, 2008) Atlenza v. Villarosa (6.8. No. 161081, 10 May 2005) People v. Sandiganbayan (G.R, No. 164185, 23 July 2008) Sales v, Carreon (GR. No, 160791, 13 February 2007) Quirog v. Aumentado (G.R. No. 163443, 11 November 2008) Page 6 of 7 Montuerto-v. Ty (GiR. No, 177736, 06 October 2008) Provincial Government of Aurora v. Marco (G.R, No, 202331, 22 April 2015) IV, Intergovernmental Relations |A. With the Nationial Government and its agencies (read See. 11, Art. K, Constitution) Cases: MMDA v. Viron Transportation Co, Inc. (G.R. No. 170656, 15 August 2007) MMDA v. Garin (GR No. 130230, April 15, 2005) Province of Rizal v. Executive Secretary (G.R, No, 129546, 13 December 2005) B. With other s V. Other Provisions Applicable to LGUs, Sees. 118-127 ‘A. Local Initiative 1, Definition 2 Procedure 3. Limitations B. Local Referendum 1, Definition Vi. Fiscal Matters, Secs. 284-383 Vil, Local Government Units, Sees. 384-510 VII, Miscellaneous and Final Provisions, Secs. 511-536 Page 7 of 7

You might also like