Professional Documents
Culture Documents
pubs.acs.org/jced
■ INTRODUCTION
(E)-Butenedioic acid, which is also called fumaric acid, is a four-
phase. In the reactive extraction process, a nonreactive
extractant is used as a diluent to decrease the viscosity and
carbon dicarboxylic acid. It is a white crystalline compound. enhance the surface properties of the reactive extractant.12
Currently, fumaric acid is synthesized chemically from maleic There are very limited studies about extraction of carboxylic
anhydride. However, as petroleum prices are increasing day by acids from aqueous solutions using nontoxic diluents such as
day, maleic anhydride as a petroleum derivative has increased in rice bran oil, sunflower oil, soybean oil, and sesame oil. Keshav
price as well. This situation has caused a search for new ways to et al.13 studied the extraction of citric acid from aqueous media
produce fumaric acid, such as fermentation.1 Recently, three using the reactive extractant tri-n-octylamine (TOA). The
strains of the fungus Rhizopus oryzae were screened to produce nontoxic natural diluents rice bran oil, sunflower oil, soybean
fumaric acid using untreated and treated corn distillers’ dried oil, and sesame oil were used to dilute TOA. TOA was found to
grains.2 Microbial production has even been discussed using the be an effective extractant for the removal of acid, providing
bacterial strain Lactobacillus.3 Fumaric acid has many uses in distribution coefficients (KD) as high as 18.51 [extraction
industrial applications, such as the production of synthetic efficiency (E) = 95 %], 16.28 (E = 94 %), 15.09 (E = 94 %),
resins, alkyd resins, paper resins, plasticizers, biodegradable and 12.82 (E = 93 %) when used with rice bran oil, sesame oil,
polymers, succinic acid, maleic acid, etc.4 Therefore, it is soybean oil, and sunflower oil, respectively. Overall extraction
important to purify fumaric acid for use in the above-mentioned constants for TOA + rice bran oil, or sunflower oil, or soybean
applications. oil, or sesame oil were determined as (35.48, 29.79, 33.79, and
Liquid−liquid extraction is a prominent, energy efficient, 37.64) mol·kg−1, respectively. Harrington and Hossain14 used
environmentally friendly, and economical process for the sunflower oil as the solvent for recovery of lactic acid from
separation of carboxylic acids from the downstream of chemical aqueous solution. Organic solutions consisting of Aliquat 336,
industry (pharmaceutical, petroleum, food processing, tanning, TOA, and tributyl phosphate (TBP) mixed with sunflower oil
etc.) and fermentation broth.5−10 Organophosphorus-bonded (as the solvent) were prepared for equilibrium studies. The
(tri-n-butyl phosphate) and long-chain aliphatic amine (tri-n- optimum extraction parameters were determined as a function
octylamine) extractants are reactive extractants and more pH (range 4.0 to 6.5). The highest extraction was reached with
effective than conventional extractants.11,12 The use of a an organic phase consisting of a mixture of 15 wt % TOA and
reactive extractant in a liquid−liquid extraction process is
termed reactive extraction. In reactive extraction, the extractant Received: July 8, 2014
and acid molecules form a complex in the organic phase, Accepted: September 23, 2014
thereby allowing more acid to be extracted from the aqueous Published: October 3, 2014
© 2014 American Chemical Society 3767 dx.doi.org/10.1021/je500634s | J. Chem. Eng. Data 2014, 59, 3767−3772
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data Article
Figure 1. Plots of KD,diluent vs [H2A]aq for physical extraction of fumaric acid using natural diluents:▲, canola oil; ■, almond oil; ◆, sesame oil.
almond oil, or canola oil) are presented. Two factors were 0.3819 and 83.64, 0.4739 and 5028, and 0.7535 and 43.51,
taken into account to show the influence of the pure diluents respectively.
on the extraction of acid: (1) partial dissociation of the acid in Chemical Extraction. Reactive extraction is described as a
the aqueous phase and (2) dimerization in the organic phase. reaction between undissociated acid molecules R′(COOH)n (n
The physical extraction of carboxylic acids with pure diluents is = 1 for monoprotic acids, n = 2 for diprotic acids, etc.) in the
described using the distribution coefficient (KD,diluent). For low aqueous phase and amine molecules (R3N) in the organic
concentrations of acids (as used in the study), Kertes and King7 phase, which in general form can be written as follows:
presented a correlation of KD,diluent in terms of the dimerization
constant (D = [(H2A)2]/[H2A]2) and the partition coefficient m[R′(COOH)n ]aq + p(R3N)org
(P = [H2A]org/[H2A]aq), as shown in eq 1:
⇄ {[R′(COOH)n ]m · (R3N)p }org (2)
KD,diluent = P + 2DP 2[H 2A]aq (1)
Here the extractability of fumaric acid (a dicarboxylic acid,
Plots of KD,diluent versus [H2A]aq were drawn using linear fitting H2A) from aqueous solution was studied. Replacing the symbol
in Excel 2010 (Figure 1), and the values of P and 2DP2 were R′(COOH)2 with H2A allows eq 2 to be written more
obtained from the intercepts and slopes, respectively. To compactly as follows:
estimate the parameters, the χ2 minimization or “weighted
(H 2A)aq + p(R3N)org ⇄ [H 2A·(R3N)p ]org (3)
least-squares” method was used, in which the goal is to
minimize the sum of the squares of the deviations between the In eq 3, the value of m from eq 2 has been set equal to 1, so p
theoretical curve and the experimental points for a range of denotes the number of amine molecules that react per molecule
independent variables. The values of P and D obtained for of acid.
extraction of fumaric acid using the natural diluents are The reactive extraction of fumaric acid can be explained with
presented in Table 2 and shown in Figure 1. two different mechanisms depending on the pH because
fumaric acid is a dicarboxylic acid, as explained by Kloetzer et
Table 2. Results for Physical Extaction of Fumaric Acid by al.18 At low pH values, one must consider the first dissociation
Single Diluents at T = 298.15 Ka constant of fumaric acid (Ka1) and the corresponding
[H2A]init [H2A]aq [H2A]org E D dissociation reaction:
diluent mol·kg −1
mol·kg −1
mol·kg −1
% P kg·mol−1 (H 2A)aq ⇄ (HA−)aq + H+ (4)
sesame oil 0.01 0.0064 0.0036 36.00 0.3819 83.64
0.02 0.0120 0.0080 40.00 [HA−]aq ·[H+]
0.03 0.0171 0.0129 43.00 K a1 =
0.04 0.0211 0.0189 47.25
[H 2A]aq (5)
0.05 0.0248 0.0252 50.40 − +
where [H2A]aq, [HA ]aq, and [H ] are the concentrations of
almond oil 0.01 0.0061 0.0039 39.00 0.4739 50.28
undissociated fumaric acid, singly dissociated fumaric acid, and
0.02 0.0116 0.0084 42.00
hydrogen ion in the aqueous phase. [H2A]aq can be found as
0.03 0.0166 0.0134 44.67
0.04 0.0207 0.0193 48.25 [H 2A]aq = [H 2A]tot,aq − [HA−]aq (6)
0.05 0.0243 0.0257 51.40
canola oil 0.01 0.0049 0.0051 51.00 0.7535 43.51 where [H2A]tot,aq is the total concentration of all forms of the
0.02 0.0092 0.0108 54.00 acid in the aqueous phase. Combining eqs 5 and eq 6 gives
0.03 0.0128 0.0172 57.33
[H 2A]tot,aq
0.04 0.0159 0.0241 60.25 [H 2A]aq = K a1
0.05 0.0184 0.0316 63.20 1+ [H+] (7)
a
[H2A]init is the initial acid concentration in the aqueous phase,
[H2A]aq is the concentration of acid in the aqueous phase after The extraction equilibrium constant (KE) can be written
extraction, [H2A]org is the concentration of acid in the organic phase according to eq 3 as follows:
after extraction, D is the dimerization constant, and P is the partition
coefficient. [H 2A·(R3N)p ]org
KE = p
[H 2A]aq · [R3N]org (8)
The distribution coefficient (KD) is defined as the ratio of the
The physical extraction experiments of fumaric acid were concentration of the acid in the organic phase to that in the
studied using three different nontoxic natural diluents: sesame aqueous phase (i.e. KD = [H2A·(R3N)p]org/[H2A]tot,aq).
oil, almond oil, and canola oil. Figure 2 shows equilibrium Combining eqs 7 and 8 gives the following expression for KD:
isotherms for physical extraction of fumaric acid. At the p
beginning, a linear relationship for the equilibrium of fumaric KE·[R3N]org
KD =
acid between the organic and aqueous phases was determined
until an initial acid concentration of 0.02 mol·kg−1. Above this (1 + K a1
[H+] ) (9)
concentration, a parabolic relationship was observed for the
three diluents. At higher concentrations, some deviation from Equation 9 can be converted to logarithmic form:
Henry’s law (nonideal behavior) was observed. The partition ⎛ K a1 ⎞
coefficients (P) and dimerization constants (D) for fumaric acid ln KD + ln⎜1 + ⎟ = ln KE + p ·ln[R3N]org
in sesame oil, almond oil, and canola oil were determined as ⎝ [H+] ⎠ (10)
Figure 2. Equilibrium isotherms for physical extraction fumaric acid. Symbols: ▲ for canola oil; ■ for almond oil; ◆ for sesame oil.
Table 3. Experimental Results for the Extraction of Fumaric Acid by TDDA in Nontoxic Natural Diluents at T = 298.15 Ka
[R3N] [H2A]org E
−1 −1
diluent mol·kg mol·kg pH(aq) KD Z % KE p
canola oil 0.157 0.037 3.776 2.47 0.236 71.15 6.73·102 0.98
0.315 0.040 3.843 3.08 0.127 75.47
0.473 0.044 3.907 4.89 0.093 83.02
0.631 0.047 3.955 6.71 0.074 87.03
0.789 0.050 3.972 12.50 0.063 92.59
almond oil 0.157 0.038 3.721 2.37 0.242 70.37 4.80·102 0.89
0.315 0.040 3.786 2.86 0.127 74.07
0.473 0.045 3.896 5.00 0.095 83.33
0.631 0.048 4.045 8.00 0.076 88.89
0.789 0.050 4.110 10.00 0.063 90.91
sesame oil 0.157 0.039 3.787 2.60 0.248 72.22 4.58·102 0.86
0.315 0.041 3.810 3.15 0.130 75.92
0.473 0.043 3.980 4.30 0.091 81.13
0.631 0.046 3.985 6.57 0.073 86.79
0.789 0.049 4.110 9.80 0.062 90.74
a
[R3N] is the initial amine concentration in the organic phase, [H2A]org is the concentration of acid in the organic phase after extraction, KE is the
thermodynamic extraction equilibrium constant, and p is the number of amine molecules per acid molecule.
p
If the reactive extraction is carried out at pH > pKa2, the KE·[R3N]org
second dissociation constant of fumaric acid must be taken into KD =
account: (1 + K a2
[H+]2 ) (15)
2− +
(H 2A)aq ⇄ (A )aq + 2H (11) Similarly, eq 15 can be represented in logarithmic form:
Table 4. Experimental Results for the Extraction of Fumaric Acid by TBA in Nontoxic Natural Diluents at T = 298.15 Ka
[R3N] [H2A]org
diluent mol·kg−1 mol·kg−1 pH(aq) KD Z E/% KE p
2
canola oil 0.418 0.039 6.742 2.60 0.248 72.22 4.48·10 0.93
0.851 0.042 6.858 3.50 0.133 77.77
1.255 0.045 6.969 5.00 0.095 83.33
1.674 0.046 6.987 5.75 0.073 85.18
2.080 0.050 6.994 12.40 0.063 92.50
almond oil 0.418 0.038 6.796 2.37 0.242 70.37 2.11·102 0.84
0.851 0.041 6.850 3.15 0.130 75.92
1.255 0.044 6.871 4.40 0.093 81.48
1.674 0.046 6.903 5.75 0.073 85.18
2.080 0.049 6.932 9.80 0.062 90.74
sesame oil 0.418 0.033 6.472 1.57 0.210 61.11 2.03·102 0.81
0.851 0.039 6.782 2.60 0.124 72.22
1.255 0.042 6.877 3.82 0.088 79.24
1.674 0.045 6.922 5.62 0.071 84.90
2.080 0.048 6.984 8.00 0.061 88.88
a
[R3N] is the initial amine concentration in the organic phase, [H2A]org is the concentration of acid in the organic phase after extraction, KE is the
thermodynamic extraction equilibrium constant, and p is the number of amine molecules per acid molecule.
Figure 3. Reaction between fumaric acid and TDDA or TBA to form the 1:1 acid·amine complex.
0.93, 0.84, and 0.81, respectively, for TBA. These values show obtained: canola oil (12.50) > almond oil (10.00) > sesame
that one amine molecule reacts with each acid molecule to form oil (9.80) in TDDA and canola oil (12.40) > almond oil (9.80)
the complex. This situation also can be explained by the loading > sesame oil (8.00) in TBA. The maximum extraction
factor (Z), which expresses the extent to which the organic efficiencies of fumaric acid were 92.59 % and 92.50 % using
phase (extractant and diluents) may be loaded with acid. Z is canola oil at 0.759 mol·kg−1 TDDA and 2.080 mol·kg−1 TBA,
defined as the ratio of the total acid concentration in the respectively. Increasing in the amine concentration results in a
organic phase at equilibrium to the total initial extractant regular increase in the extraction efficiency. When the
concentration in the extract phase: extraction efficiencies of physical extraction and chemical
extraction were compared, the extraction efficiency increased
[H 2A]org
Z= approximately from 63 % to 93 % for canola oil, from 51 % to
[R3N] (17) % 91 for almond oil, and from 50 % to 90 % for sesame oil.
These efficiencies may be raised by using reactive extractants.
It can clearly be observed from Tables 3 and 4 that the Further extra benefits of natural nontoxic diluents may be
loading factor values for all of the natural diluents were lower gained by using canola oil, almond oil, and sesame oil.
■
than 0.5. The Z values were in the range from 0.062 to 0.248
for TDDA and 0.061 to 0.248 for TBA. Overloading (Z > 1) CONCLUSION
was not observed. This suggests that the complex form contains
one amine molecule and one acid molecule (1:1) for both The extractability of fumaric acid by amine extractants (TDDA
extractants. Figure 3 presents the reaction between fumaric acid and TBA) dissolved in natural nontoxic diluents (canola oil,
and TDDA or TBA to give the complex. Barrow and Yerger19 almond oil, and sesame oil) were investigated. Physical and
presented an acid·amine complex structure. They proposed that chemical extraction were compared in terms of extraction
the proton (H+) in the −COOH group of the carboxylic acid efficiency. The extraction equilibrium was taken to be a result of
molecule interacts directly with the amine to form an ion pair the formation of 1:1 acid·amine complexes. The thermody-
and hence the 1:1 acid·amine complex. namic extraction constants KE were obtained from a graphical
The results of extraction of fumaric acid by TDDA and TBA method. The maximum synergistic extraction efficiency (E) was
determined as 92.59 % with TDDA in canola oil.
■
dissolved in the natural nontoxic diluents canola oil, almond oil,
and sesame oil in terms of distribution coefficient and
AUTHOR INFORMATION
extraction efficiency are tabulated in Tables 3 and 4. The
extraction power of (TDDA + diluent) and (TBA + diluent) Corresponding Author
mixtures changes with increasing initial concentration of amine *E-mail: hasanuslu@gmail.com.
in the organic phase. When the distribution coefficients (KD) of Notes
the diluents were compared, the following orders were The authors declare no competing financial interest.
3771 dx.doi.org/10.1021/je500634s | J. Chem. Eng. Data 2014, 59, 3767−3772
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data
■
Article
REFERENCES
(1) Goldberg, I.; Stieglitz, B. Fermentation process for production of
carboxylic acids. U.S. Patent 4,564,594, 1986.
(2) Thomas, P. W. Fumaric acid production by Rhizopus oryzae on
corn distillers’ grains with solubles. Res. J. Microbiol. 2008, 3, 35−40.
(3) Donnelly, M.; Millard, C. S.; Stols, L. Mutant E. coli strain with
increased succinic acid production. US RE37393 E1, 2001.
(4) Roa Engel, C. A.; Straathof, A. J.; Zijlmans, T. W.; Van Gulik, W.
M.; Vander Wielen, L. A. Fumaric acid production by fermentation.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 78, 379−389.
(5) Malmary, G.; Vezier, A.; Robert, A.; Molinier, J.; Mourgues, J.;
Conte, T. Recovery of tartaric and malic acids from dilute aqueous
effluents by solvent extraction technique. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.
1994, 60, 67−71.
(6) Jaquet, A.; Quan, I.; Marision, I. W.; Stockar, U. V. Factors
influencing the potential use of Aliquat 336 for the in situ extraction of
carboxylic acids from cultures of Pseudomonas putida. J. Biotechnol.
1999, 68, 185−196.
(7) Kertes, A. S.; King, C. J. Extraction Chemistry of Fermentation
Product Carboxylic Acids. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1986, 28, 269−282.
(8) Uslu, H. Reactive extraction of levulinic acid using TPA in
toluene solution: LSER modeling, kinetic and equilibrium studies. Sep.
Sci. Technol. 2008, 43, 1535−1548.
(9) Uslu, H.; Gök, A.; Kırbaşlar, Ş. I.̇ Phase equilibria of (water +
levunilic acid + alcohol) ternary systems. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2008,
273, 21−26.
(10) Keshav, A.; Wasewar, K. L.; Chand, S.; Uslu, H. Effect of binary
extractants and modifier-diluents systems on equilbria of propionic
acid extraction. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2009, 275, 21−26.
(11) Tuyun, A. F.; Uslu, H.; Gökmen, S.; Yorulmaz, Y. Recovery of
picolinic acid from aqueous streams using a tertiary amine extractant. J.
Chem. Eng. Data 2011, 56, 2310−2315.
(12) Tamada, J. A.; Kertes, A. S.; King, C. J. Extraction of carboxylic
acids with amine extractants. 1. Equilibria and law of mass action
modeling. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1990, 29, 1319−1326.
(13) Keshav, A.; Norge, P.; Wasewar, K. L. Reactive Extraction of
Citric Acid Using Tri-n-octylamine in Nontoxic Natural Diluents: Part
1Equilibrium Studies from Aqueous Solutions. Appl. Biochem.
Biotechnol. 2012, 167, 197−213.
(14) Harrington, T.; Hossain, M. Extraction of lactic acid into
sunflower oil and its recovery into an aqueous solution. Desalination
2008, 218, 287−296.
(15) Waghmare, M. D.; Wasewar, K. L.; Sonawane, S. S.; Shende, D.
Z. Natural Nontoxic Solvents for Recovery of Picolinic Acid by
Reactive Extraction. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 13526−13537.
(16) Athankar, K. K.; Varma, M. N.; Shende, D. Z.; Yoo, C. K.;
Wasewar, K. L. Reactive Extraction of Phenylacetic Acid with Tri-n-
butyl Phosphate in Benzene, Hexanol, and Rice Bran Oil at 298 K. J.
Chem. Eng. Data 2013, 58, 3240−3248.
(17) Waghmare, M. D.; Wasewar, K. L.; Sonawane, S. S.; Shende, D.
Z. Reactive extraction of picolinic and nicotinic acid by natural non-
toxic solvent. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 120, 296−303.
(18) Kloetzer, L.; Cascaval, D.; Galaction, A. I. Influence of Solvent
Polarity on Interfacial Mechanism and Efficiency of Succinic Acid
Reactive Extraction with Tri-n-octylamine. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2013,
200, 701−717.
(19) Barrow, G. M.; Yerger, E. A. Acid−Base Reactions in Non-
dissociating Solvents. Acetic Acid and Triethylamine in Carbon
Tetrachloride and Chloroform. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76, 5211−
5216.