the more traditional and commonly used granulation
processes in design and development of a solid oral drug product. It is used to achieve the desired bulk density, flow, and compaction properties of the formulation.1 It also helps minimize segregation and offers better content uniformity.2 In certain instances it can also be used to improve the bioavailability of a formulation by providing intimate contact between a poorly water-soluble drug and a surfactant, and was shown to mitigate food effect.3,4 Another known benefit of the wet granulation process is the robustness of the process to handle changes in active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) powder properties. This can be important during the early stages of drug product development where the API manufacturing process undergoes optimization and scale-up, thus producing materials with some variations in powder properties. Other manufacturing processes, such as direct compression and dry granulation, usually experience a more significant impact of any changes to API powder properties.5,6 Direct compression has the advantage of short manufacturing time, but requires formulation with adequate density, flow, and compaction properties. These criteria are not commonly met for high drug loading formulations. On the other hand, low drug loading formulations may present a high risk of blend segregation and poor content uniformity when using a direct compression process. There are also some significant challenges with dry granulation (using roller compaction), such as flow into the roller compactor (especially at high drug loading), sticking to the rolls, and loss of compaction after passing through the rolls,7,8 all of which are not present for the high-shear wet granulation process. Wet granulation is the preferred manufacturing method for formulations with high drug loading. However, the use of water and/or high degree of shear during wet granulation offer a different set of challenges for APIs that are sensitive to water and shear and can undergo transformation (eg, form conversion) that may lead to a worse drug product stability profile.914 The wet granulation process also requires an additional unit operation of drying. There are other variants of wet granulation process that may be used as alternatives to the high- shear process, such as low-shear, fluid bed, and twin-screw granulation based on the specific formulation and process challenges of the drug product. For APIs sensitive to shear, a low-shear process may be preferrable.15 Fluid bed granulation has the advantage of providing short exposure of the granulation to the water compared with high-shear granulation. It imparts less shear and densification of the granulation and results in more porous granules that can have a higher dissolution rate and better compaction properties. A choice between these manufacturing processes can be made by manufacturing process risk assessments based on prior drug product formulation knowledge, such as sensitivity to moisture, shear, and/or temperature. A typical high-shear wet granulation formulation consists of API, filler (eg, microcrystalline cellulose and/or lactose), disintegrant (eg, superdisintegrants such as croscarmellose sodium), binder (eg, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC)), and lubricant (eg, magnesium stearate). In some cases it may also contain a surfactant (eg, sodium