Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Williamson, MD John
#{149} C. Gouse, MD
#{149}
Dennis C. Rohrer, MD C.
#{149} David Teates, MD
683
CT images (2, 3). This pitfall can gen-
erally be avoided by recognizing that
variation is possible and by follow-
ing the structure on sequential sec-
tions (2, 3).
Our case (Fig. 1) was unusual in
that the left crus was thicker than the
right. Sequential sections were help-
ful but did not resolve the question
of whether the mass was a normal
variant or an abnormality. The
change in configuration between ex-
piration and inspiration was instru-
mental in confirming the diagnosis.
a.b. In the ten trial cases (Table 1) both
Figure 2. (a) Expiration baseline size. (b) The crura have increased in thickness at full in-
crura showed an increase in thick-
spiration. ness at full inspiration as compared
with the size at full expiration. There
was not a direct correlation between
the degree of diaphragmatic excur-
sion and the change in crural thick-
ness (Table 1). Clearly, however,
change in liver position is an indirect
and possibly imprecise method of de-
termining diaphragmatic motion. It
makes no allowance for possible van-
ations in liver compressibility, vania-
tions in respiration from one section
to the next, or the variable degree of
Valsalva during suspended respira-
tion. It also assesses right hemidia-
phragmatic motion only.
Respiratory variation in crural
thickness would be helpful in those
situations in which sequential scans
do not adequately permit distinction
between a normal crus and an abnon-
mality. U
ration. The thickness at expiration was 2). The mean change in thickness of
used as the baseline size. We measured the right cnus was 3.0 mm (37.2%); References
the largest short-axis thickness of the cru- 1. Gray H. Anatomy of the human body.
the range was from 1.0 to 7.0 mm.
ra on each occasion (Fig. 2b). Measure- 36th British ed. Williams PL, Warwick R,
The mean change in thickness of the
ments were obtained at the level of the eds. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1980; 548-549.
left crus was 2.4 mm (53.1%), with a 2. Kuhns LR, Seeger J. Atlas of computed to-
origin of the superior mesenteric artery
so that a fixed level could be obtained for
range from 1.0 to 4.0 mm. mography variants. Chicago: Year Book
Medical, 1983; 212-217.
comparison purposes. The degree of dia-
3. Callen PW, Filly RA, Korobkin M. Com-
phragmatic movement was assessed on puted tomographic evaluation of the dia-
DISCUSSION
the basis of liver movement at the level of phragmatic crura. Radiology 1978; 126:413-
the origin of the superior mesenteric ar- The diaphragmatic crura are pre- 416.
tery. When the appearance of the liver dominantly muscular in nature (1). 4. Nightingale RC, Dixon AK. Crura! change
section was not identical on both inspira- The night crus is broader and longer
with respiration: a potential mimic of dis-
tion and expiration, the distance was ease. Br J Radiol 1984; 57:101-102.
than the left and arises from L-1, L-2, 5. Rosen A, Auh YH, Rubenstein WA, Engel
halved. Thus, some measurements regis-
and L-3. The left crus arises from L-1 IA, Whalen JP, Kazam E. CT appearance of
ter half centimeters even though 10-mm-
and L-2. They both blend with the diaphragmatic pseudotumors. J Comput
thick sections were used (Table 1).
Assist Tomogr 1983; 7:995-999.
anterior longitudinal ligament of the
6. Anda S. R#{216}ysland P. Fougner R, St#{216}vring J.
vertebral column (1). CT appearance of the diaphragm varying
RESULTS In cross section, the crura are usu- with respiratory phase and muscular ten-
ally oval on comma shaped and are of sion. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986; 10:744-
In all ten patients, the crural thick-
745.
ness increased on inspiration as com- variable thickness. Alterations in the
usual size on shape of the cruna can,
pared with expiration (Table 1) (Fig.
however, cause confusion and lead to
possible misinterpretation on axial