Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nejmra 043442
Nejmra 043442
review article
current concepts
a
From the Department of Haematology, St. n examination of the blood smear (or film) may be
Mary’s Hospital, London. Send reprint re- requested by physicians or initiated by laboratory staff. With the
quests to Dr. Bain at St. Mary’s Hospital,
Praed St., London W2 1NY, United development of sophis- ticated automated blood-cell analyzers, the
King- dom, or at b.bain@imperial.ac.uk. proportion of blood-count sam-
ples that require a blood smear has steadily diminished and in many clinical settings
N Engl J Med 2005;353:498-
507. is now 10 to 15 percent or less. Nevertheless, the blood smear remains a crucial
Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical diagnos- tic aid. The proportion of requests for a complete blood count that
Society.
generate a blood smear is determined by local policies and sometimes by financial
A related slide show is available at and regulatory as well as medical considerations. For maximal information to be
www.nejm.org derived from a blood smear, the examination should be performed by an experienced
and skilled person, either a lab- oratory scientist or a medically qualified hematologist
or pathologist. In Europe, only laboratory-trained staff members generally “read” a
blood smear, whereas in the Unit- ed States, physicians have often done this.
Increasingly, regulatory controls limit the role of physicians who are not laboratory-
certified. Nevertheless, it is important for physicians to know what pathologists or
laboratory hematologists are looking for and should be looking for in a smear. In
comparison with the procedure for an automated blood count, the examination of a
blood smear is a labor-intensive and therefore rela- tively expensive investigation and
must be used judiciously.
A physician-initiated request for a blood smear is usually a response to perceived
clinical features or to an abnormality shown in a previous complete blood count. A
lab- oratory-initiated request for a blood smear is usually the result of an abnormality
in the complete blood count or a response to “flags” produced by an automated
instrument. Less often, it is a response to clinical details given with the request for a
complete blood count when the physician has not specifically requested examination
of a smear. For example, a laboratory might have a policy of always examining a
blood smear if the clin- ical details indicate lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly. The
International Society for Laboratory Hematology has published consensus criteria
(available at www.islh.org) for the laboratory-initiated review of blood smears on the
basis of the results of the au- tomated blood count. The indications for smear review
differ according to the age and sex of the patient, whether the request is an initial or
a subsequent one, and whether there has been a clinically significant change from a
previous validated result (referred to as a failed delta check). All laboratories should
have a protocol for the examination of a laboratory-initiated blood smear, which can
reasonably be based on the criteria of the International Society for Laboratory
Hematology. Regulatory groups should permit the examination of a blood smear
when such protocols indicate that it is necessary.
now also seen in Europe and North America as a of considerable clinical significance, since this
result of immigration (Fig. 1C). The presence of type of anemia may indicate pregnancy-
spherocytes is not diagnostically specific, since associated hy- pertension, disseminated cancer,
this may result from hereditary spherocytosis, chronic dissemi- nated intravascular coagulation,
autoim- mune hemolytic anemia, or alloimmune the hemolytic–ure- mic syndrome, or thrombotic
hemolytic anemia (e.g., hemolytic disease of the thrombocytopenic purpura; the latter two
newborn or a delayed transfusion reaction). conditions both require ur- gent diagnosis so that
Nevertheless, con- sideration of the clinical appropriate management can be initiated. In
features, together with the results of a direct microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, examination
antiglobulin test, in patients with spherocytes will of the blood smear is also important to validate
generally indicate the correct diag- nosis. the platelet count, since red-cell frag- ments and
Microspherocytes (i.e., cells that are both hy- platelets may be of similar size. Most au- tomated
perchromic and significantly reduced in size and instruments cannot make this distinction. A
therefore in diameter) may be present in low minority of automated instruments that measure
num- bers in patients with a spherocytic both the size and the refractive index of small
hemolytic ane- mia but are also characteristic of parti- cles in the blood sample can make this
burns and of mi- croangiopathic hemolytic distinction and can be used to exclude red-cell
anemia. The detection of a microangiopathic fragmentation; however, although the fragment
hemolytic anemia (Fig. 1D) is “flag” on such in- struments is sensitive, it is not
specific. Hence, a
A B
C D
A B
C D
may be found after acute hemolysis in G6PD- ther investigation and a trial of treatment are
defi- cient persons in two situations. First, men of need- ed. Liver disease and excess ethanol
Afri- can or African-American ancestry who are consumption are common causes of macrocytosis,
hemizy- gous for the A¡ alloenzyme (which is with the blood smear usually showing round rather
present at normal levels in reticulocytes) can than oval mac- rocytes and lacking
have normal G6PD levels because the reticulocyte hypersegmented neutrophils; target cells and
count is high after hemolysis. Second, female stomatocytes may also be present.
carriers — for ex- ample, those who are In elderly patients, the myelodysplastic syn-
hemizygous for the common Mediterranean dromes are an important cause of macrocytosis.
variant of G6PD — can have a nor- mal assay Blood-smear features that may point to the
result after an acute hemolytic episode because diagno- sis include hypogranular or
the abnormal cells have lysed preferential- ly, hypolobulated neu- trophils (Fig. 3B), blast cells
leaving mainly the cells expressing the normal (Fig. 3B), giant or hy- pogranular platelets,
allele in the circulation. In both of these circum- Pappenheimer bodies (Fig.
stances, the observation of a typical blood smear 3C), and the presence of a minor population of
in an appropriate clinical setting is an indication hy- pochromic microcytic cells, leading to a
to repeat the assay once the acute hemolytic dimorphic smear (Fig. 3C). Macrocytic anemia
episode is over. resulting from congenital dyserythropoietic
Other features may aid in the differential diag- anemia also yields a characteristic blood smear,
nosis of hemolytic anemia. For example, the with striking poikilocy- tosis (Fig. 3D). When
pres- ence of red-cell agglutinates usually macrocytosis is the result of hemolysis or recent
indicates the presence of a cold agglutinin, and blood loss, the blood smear shows
erythrophagocy- tosis is often a feature of polychromasia, which results from an in- creased
paroxysmal cold hemo- globinuria (Fig. 2D). reticulocyte count.
A B
C D
curate diagnosis4,5 (Fig. 4B and 4C). The blood condition (Fig. 4D); sometimes there is coexist-
smear of a compound heterozygote usually shows ing thrombocytopenia.
target cells, irregularly contracted cells, and boat-
shaped cells but few classic sickle cells; typical
he- moglobin SC poikilocytes (formed only when
th rom bo cy to p en i a
an d t hro mb oc yt osi s
he- moglobin S and hemoglobin C are both
present) are often seen. Sometimes the blood A blood smear should always be examined for pa-
smear of a compound heterozygote shows only tients with thrombocytopenia, both to confirm the
target cells and irregularly contracted cells and thrombocytopenia and to look for the underlying
cannot be dis- tinguished from the smear in cause. Falsely low platelet counts may be the
hemoglobin C homo- zygosity; a positive sickle result of small clots, platelet clumping (Fig. 5A
cell solubility test per- mits these conditions to and the Supplementary Appendix), platelet
be distinguished in an emergency situation (e.g., satellitism (Fig.
preoperatively). A blood smear is also important 5B), or abnormally large platelets. Fibrin strands
in the diagnosis of an un- stable hemoglobin, (Fig. 5C) indicate that thrombocytopenia is likely
with irregularly contracted cells and to be factitious. Underlying causes that may be
macrocytosis being characteristic of this re- vealed by the blood smear include the May–
Hegglin
A B
C D
mia, or infiltration of nonhematopoietic malignant produces a highly improbable result. Such results
cells into the bone marrow. The role of the blood may be factitious, resulting from the accidental
smear in the diagnosis of leukemia and freezing or heating of the blood, from
lymphoma is to suggest a likely diagnosis or hyperlipide- mia, or from the presence of cold
range of diag- noses, to indicate which additional agglutinins, a cry- oglobulin (Fig. 6C), bacteria,
tests should be performed, and to provide a or fungi. Factitious results also may stem from
morphologic context without which unusual characteristics of the blood cells or the
immunophenotyping and other so- phisticated plasma, such as a pseudo- neutropenia caused by
investigations cannot be interpreted. For two a myeloperoxidase deficien- cy that occurs when
conditions, Burkitt’s lymphoma (Fig. 6A and the the automated instrument em- ploys a peroxidase
Supplementary Appendix) and acute pro- reaction for the identification of neutrophils,
myelocytic leukemia (Fig. 6B), a blood smear is eosinophils, and monocytes. Falsely low counts
of particular importance because it facilitates also may result from neutrophil or plate- let
rapid diagnosis and specific treatment. clumping or from platelet satellitism.
pr ob ab l e fa ct it io u s re sul t s s er en d ip it y
Members of the laboratory staff should always Occasionally, a blood smear leads to a fortuitous
ini- tiate a blood smear if an automated diagnosis that can be very important to the patient
instrument
A B
C D E
Figure 5. Blood-Smear Features Associated with Thrombocytopenia and Errors in the Platelet Count.
Panel A shows large clumps of platelets that led to a factitiously low platelet count. Panel B demonstrates platelet satel-
litism. Panel C shows fibrin strands (arrow). Panel D shows the May–Hegglin anomaly, with large platelets and a
charac- teristic neutrophil inclusion (arrow). Panel E shows Candida glabrata (arrows) that led to a sudden, unexpected
improvement in the “platelet” count. All specimens were stained with May–Grünwald–Giemsa stain.
A B
C D
Figure 6. Miscellaneous Conditions in Which the Blood Smear Can Be Diagnostically Important.
Panel A shows Burkitt’s lymphoma, with three basophilic vacuolated lymphoma cells. Hypogranular promyelocytic
leukemia is shown in Panel B, with two characteristic bilobed leukemic promyelocytes. Panel C depicts cryoglobulin
deposition in a blood sample from a patient with hepatitis C virus infection. Panel D shows target cells (short arrow),
acanthocytes (long arrow), and a Howell–Jolly body (arrowhead) — all features of hyposplenism — in a blood smear
from a patient with iron-deficiency anemia and splenic atrophy as features of celiac disease. All specimens were stained
with May–Grünwald–Giemsa stain.
smears or an image derived from them. Some Table 2. Fortuitous Observations That May Be of Diagnostic Importance.
lab- oratories retain all smears that have been
reviewed by a laboratory hematologist or Red-cell fragmentation
Hyposplenism
pathologist; this can create a storage problem,
Cryoglobulinemia (may indicate hepatitis C virus infection or a plasma-cell
and it is likely that, increasingly, digital images of neoplasm)
important abnormal smears will be stored. Red-cell agglutinates (may indicate cold agglutinins, as in mycoplasma infec-
tion, infectious mononucleosis, or lymphoproliferative disorder)
Dysplastic features typical of human immunodeficiency virus infection
th e fu tu r e Presence of leukemic blasts or lymphoma or myeloma cells
The continuing importance of the blood smear is Malaria or other parasitic infections (usually malaria but occasionally babesi-
highlighted by the recent introduction of photo- osis, leishmaniasis, African trypanosomiasis, Chagas’ disease, or filariasis)
graphs of blood smears as a regular feature in Fungal infection (e.g., candidiasis, histoplasmosis)
Bacteria (relapsing fever, ehrlichiosis, meningococcal or pneumococcal
both the journal Blood10 and the British Journal of infection)
Haema-
tology, by ongoing efforts to develop image-recog-
nition technology for the automated examination
of blood smears, and by the development of tele- ry staff should make and examine a blood smear
hematology to permit the remote interpretation or whenever the results of the complete blood count
second opinions of blood smears.11,12 indicate that a blood smear is essential for the
vali- dation or the further elucidation of a
c on c lu sion s detected ab- normality. If error is to be avoided,
sophisticated modern investigations of
Even in the age of molecular analysis, the blood hematologic disorders should be interpreted in
smear remains an important diagnostic tool. Physi- the light of peripheral-blood features as well as the
cians should request a blood smear when there are clinical context.
clinical indications for it. Members of the I am indebted to Dr. Bernadette Garvey of Toronto and Dr.
laborato- LoAnne
Peterson of Chicago for their helpful comments on the manuscript.
re f e re nc e s
1. Case Records of the Massachusetts Gen- cell-haemoglobin C disease. Br J Haematol 9. Kakkar N. Spurious rise in the automat-
eral Hospital (Case 30-2004). N Engl J Med 1993;83:516-8. ed platelet count because of bacteria. J Clin
2004;351:1333-41. 6. Latif S, Veillon DM, Brown D, et al. Pathol 2004;57:1096-7.
2. Lesesve JF, Salignac S, Alla F, et al. Com- Spurious automated platelet count: enu- 10. Shattil SJ. A (blood) smear campaign.
parative evaluation of schistocyte counting meration of yeast forms as platelets by the Blood 2003;101:2453.
by an automated method and by microscop- Cell-DYN 4000. Am J Clin Pathol 2003;120: 11. Abramson N. Inside blood: a picture (in
ic determination. Am J Clin Pathol 2004;121: 882-5. the microscope) is worth a thousand words.
739-45. 7. Arnold JA, Jowri Z, Bain BJ. Candida gla- Blood 2004;103:367-8.
3. Bain BJ. Heinz body haemolytic anaemia brata in a blood smear. Br J Haematol 1999; 12. Luethi U, Risch L, Korte W, Bader M,
in Wilson’s disease. Br J Haematol 1999;104: 104:1. Huber R. Telehematology: critical determi-
647. 8. van der Meer W, MacKenzie MA, Din- nants for successful implementation. Blood
4. Diggs LW, Bell A. Intraerythrocytic he- nissen JW, de Keijzer MH. Pseudoplatelets: 2004;103:486-8.
moglobin crystals in sickle cell-hemoglobin a retrospective study of their incidence and Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.
C disease. Blood 1965;25:218-23. interference with platelet counting. J Clin
5. Bain BJ. Blood smear features of sickle Pathol 2003;56:772-4.