Group 1: edig, mabayao, monares, winceslao

Varied Case Study

Case Study Evaluation Rubric
Criteria Score =2 Score=4 Score=5 Score
Needs satisfactory outstanding
improvement
Identify/define Failed to identify Identified Clearly identified 4
the main the root problem, contributing factors the root problem,
problem and/or and did not but did not and provided clear
main issue indicate any recognize the root insight into the
causal factors cause causal factors
Determining the Did not identify Identified some of Clearly & 4
relevant relevant the relevant completely
information to information that information that determined the
address the would assist in would assist in relevant information
problem/issue resolving the resolving the issue needed to address
issue the problem
Generate Failed to develop Developed Developed at least
hypotheses & discrete, alternative three discrete, 2
construct sound alternative course(s) of action viable COAs, and
and coherent courses of action (COAs), but they build solid
arguments fail to respond fully arguments to
related to the to the root support their
solving of the issue(s)/problem(s statements
case problem(s) )
Testing Failed to Develop Developed an Developed a Clear, 2
hypotheses & a Viable argument that concise, Argument
making counter- Argument or supported one Or and fully compared
arguments Compare more COAs But the alternative
alternative COAs didn’t make A COAs
compelling
argument
Evaluating the Did not evaluate Offered an Fully evaluated the 2
results & the results nor evaluation of the results and made a
recommended make any viable results but didn’t cogent argument
course(s) of counter- choose a viable for the selected
action (COA) arguments COA that would COA
resolve the
problem
Note: Total 28
Score is 50
points
(Score x 2)
Group 2: onud, baura,orcollo, congayo
Varied Case Study
Case Study Evaluation Rubric
Criteria Score =2 Score=4 Score=5 Score
Needs satisfactory outstanding
improvement
Identify/define Failed to identify Identified Clearly identified 4
the main the root problem, contributing factors the root problem,
problem and/or and did not but did not and provided clear
main issue indicate any recognize the root insight into the
causal factors cause causal factors
Determining the Did not identify Identified some of Clearly & 4
relevant relevant the relevant completely
information to information that information that determined the
address the would assist in would assist in relevant information
problem/issue resolving the resolving the issue needed to address
issue the problem
Generate Failed to develop Developed Developed at least 4
hypotheses & discrete, alternative three discrete,
construct sound alternative course(s) of action viable COAs, and
and coherent courses of action (COAs), but they build solid
arguments fail to respond fully arguments to
related to the to the root support their
solving of the issue(s)/problem(s statements
case problem(s) )
Testing Failed to Develop Developed an Developed a Clear, 4
hypotheses & a Viable argument that concise, Argument
making counter- Argument or supported one Or and fully compared
arguments Compare more COAs But the alternative
alternative COAs didn’t make A COAs
compelling
argument
Evaluating the Did not evaluate Offered an Fully evaluated the 2
results & the results nor evaluation of the results and made a
recommended make any viable results but didn’t cogent argument
course(s) of counter- choose a viable for the selected
action (COA) arguments COA that would COA
resolve the
problem
Note: Total 36
Score is 50
points
(Score x 2)
Group 3: pono. Mangmang, Fuertes, paninsoro
Varied Case Study
Case Study Evaluation Rubric
Criteria Score =2 Score=4 Score=5 Score
Needs satisfactory outstanding
improvement
Identify/define Failed to identify Identified Clearly identified 4
the main the root problem, contributing factors the root problem,
problem and/or and did not but did not and provided clear
main issue indicate any recognize the root insight into the
causal factors cause causal factors
Determining the Did not identify Identified some of Clearly & 4
relevant relevant the relevant completely
information to information that information that determined the
address the would assist in would assist in relevant information
problem/issue resolving the resolving the issue needed to address
issue the problem
Generate Failed to develop Developed Developed at least 4
hypotheses & discrete, alternative three discrete,
construct sound alternative course(s) of action viable COAs, and
and coherent courses of action (COAs), but they build solid
arguments fail to respond fully arguments to
related to the to the root support their
solving of the issue(s)/problem(s statements
case problem(s) )
Testing Failed to Develop Developed an Developed a Clear, 4
hypotheses & a Viable argument that concise, Argument
making counter- Argument or supported one Or and fully compared
arguments Compare more COAs But the alternative
alternative COAs didn’t make A COAs
compelling
argument
Evaluating the Did not evaluate Offered an Fully evaluated the 4
results & the results nor evaluation of the results and made a
recommended make any viable results but didn’t cogent argument
course(s) of counter- choose a viable for the selected
action (COA) arguments COA that would COA
resolve the
problem
Note: Total 40
Score is 50
points
(Score x 2)
Test VI . perea, ferianelia,loro,jaballa.
Varied Case Study
Case Study Evaluation Rubric
Criteria Score =2 Score=4 Score=5 Score
Needs satisfactory outstanding
improvement
Identify/define Failed to identify Identified Clearly identified 4
the main the root problem, contributing factors the root problem,
problem and/or and did not but did not and provided clear
main issue indicate any recognize the root insight into the
causal factors cause causal factors
Determining the Did not identify Identified some of Clearly & 2
relevant relevant the relevant completely
information to information that information that determined the
address the would assist in would assist in relevant information
problem/issue resolving the resolving the issue needed to address
issue the problem
Generate Failed to develop Developed Developed at least 2
hypotheses & discrete, alternative three discrete,
construct sound alternative course(s) of action viable COAs, and
and coherent courses of action (COAs), but they build solid
arguments fail to respond fully arguments to
related to the to the root support their
solving of the issue(s)/problem(s statements
case problem(s) )
Testing Failed to Develop Developed an Developed a Clear, 2
hypotheses & a Viable argument that concise, Argument
making counter- Argument or supported one Or and fully compared
arguments Compare more COAs But the alternative
alternative COAs didn’t make A COAs
compelling
argument
Evaluating the Did not evaluate Offered an Fully evaluated the 2
results & the results nor evaluation of the results and made a
recommended make any viable results but didn’t cogent argument
course(s) of counter- choose a viable for the selected
action (COA) arguments COA that would COA
resolve the
problem
Note: Total 24
Score is 50
points
(Score x 2)
Test VI . ah, ken, bandalan, ,melencion, sumayo
Varied Case Study
Case Study Evaluation Rubric
Criteria Score =2 Score=4 Score=5 Score
Needs satisfactory outstanding
improvement
Identify/define Failed to identify Identified Clearly identified 5
the main the root problem, contributing factors the root problem,
problem and/or and did not but did not and provided clear
main issue indicate any recognize the root insight into the
causal factors cause causal factors
Determining the Did not identify Identified some of Clearly & 5
relevant relevant the relevant completely
information to information that information that determined the
address the would assist in would assist in relevant information
problem/issue resolving the resolving the issue needed to address
issue the problem
Generate Failed to develop Developed Developed at least 4
hypotheses & discrete, alternative three discrete,
construct sound alternative course(s) of action viable COAs, and
and coherent courses of action (COAs), but they build solid
arguments fail to respond fully arguments to
related to the to the root support their
solving of the issue(s)/problem(s statements
case problem(s) )
Testing Failed to Develop Developed an Developed a Clear, 4
hypotheses & a Viable argument that concise, Argument
making counter- Argument or supported one Or and fully compared
arguments Compare more COAs But the alternative
alternative COAs didn’t make A COAs
compelling
argument
Evaluating the Did not evaluate Offered an Fully evaluated the 4
results & the results nor evaluation of the results and made a
recommended make any viable results but didn’t cogent argument
course(s) of counter- choose a viable for the selected
action (COA) arguments COA that would COA
resolve the
problem
Note: Total 44
Score is 50
points
(Score x 2)
Test VI . quibol. Laping, basaca, lent tano.
Varied Case Study
Case Study Evaluation Rubric
Criteria Score =2 Score=4 Score=5 Score
Needs satisfactory outstanding
improvement
Identify/define Failed to identify Identified Clearly identified 4
the main the root problem, contributing factors the root problem,
problem and/or and did not but did not and provided clear
main issue indicate any recognize the root insight into the
causal factors cause causal factors
Determining the Did not identify Identified some of Clearly & 4
relevant relevant the relevant completely
information to information that information that determined the
address the would assist in would assist in relevant information
problem/issue resolving the resolving the issue needed to address
issue the problem
Generate Failed to develop Developed Developed at least 4
hypotheses & discrete, alternative three discrete,
construct sound alternative course(s) of action viable COAs, and
and coherent courses of action (COAs), but they build solid
arguments fail to respond fully arguments to
related to the to the root support their
solving of the issue(s)/problem(s statements
case problem(s) )
Testing Failed to Develop Developed an Developed a Clear, 4
hypotheses & a Viable argument that concise, Argument
making counter- Argument or supported one Or and fully compared
arguments Compare more COAs But the alternative
alternative COAs didn’t make A COAs
compelling
argument
Evaluating the Did not evaluate Offered an Fully evaluated the 4
results & the results nor evaluation of the results and made a
recommended make any viable results but didn’t cogent argument
course(s) of counter- choose a viable for the selected
action (COA) arguments COA that would COA
resolve the
problem
Note: Total 40
Score is 50
points
(Score x 2)
Test VI . sy, aliganga, ebero,nabong
Varied Case Study
Case Study Evaluation Rubric
Criteria Score =2 Score=4 Score=5 Score
Needs satisfactory outstanding
improvement
Identify/define Failed to identify Identified Clearly identified 5
the main the root problem, contributing factors the root problem,
problem and/or and did not but did not and provided clear
main issue indicate any recognize the root insight into the
causal factors cause causal factors
Determining the Did not identify Identified some of Clearly & 5
relevant relevant the relevant completely
information to information that information that determined the
address the would assist in would assist in relevant information
problem/issue resolving the resolving the issue needed to address
issue the problem
Generate Failed to develop Developed Developed at least 5
hypotheses & discrete, alternative three discrete,
construct sound alternative course(s) of action viable COAs, and
and coherent courses of action (COAs), but they build solid
arguments fail to respond fully arguments to
related to the to the root support their
solving of the issue(s)/problem(s statements
case problem(s) )
Testing Failed to Develop Developed an Developed a Clear, 4
hypotheses & a Viable argument that concise, Argument
making counter- Argument or supported one Or and fully compared
arguments Compare more COAs But the alternative
alternative COAs didn’t make A COAs
compelling
argument
Evaluating the Did not evaluate Offered an Fully evaluated the 4
results & the results nor evaluation of the results and made a
recommended make any viable results but didn’t cogent argument
course(s) of counter- choose a viable for the selected
action (COA) arguments COA that would COA
resolve the
problem
Note: Total 46
Score is 50
points
(Score x 2)
Test VI . doro, soliva,duga duga, regodon
Varied Case Study
Case Study Evaluation Rubric
Criteria Score =2 Score=4 Score=5 Score
Needs satisfactory outstanding
improvement
Identify/define Failed to identify Identified Clearly identified 4
the main the root problem, contributing factors the root problem,
problem and/or and did not but did not and provided clear
main issue indicate any recognize the root insight into the
causal factors cause causal factors
Determining the Did not identify Identified some of Clearly & 4
relevant relevant the relevant completely
information to information that information that determined the
address the would assist in would assist in relevant information
problem/issue resolving the resolving the issue needed to address
issue the problem
Generate Failed to develop Developed Developed at least 2
hypotheses & discrete, alternative three discrete,
construct sound alternative course(s) of action viable COAs, and
and coherent courses of action (COAs), but they build solid
arguments fail to respond fully arguments to
related to the to the root support their
solving of the issue(s)/problem(s statements
case problem(s) )
Testing Failed to Develop Developed an Developed a Clear, 2
hypotheses & a Viable argument that concise, Argument
making counter- Argument or supported one Or and fully compared
arguments Compare more COAs But the alternative
alternative COAs didn’t make A COAs
compelling
argument
Evaluating the Did not evaluate Offered an Fully evaluated the 2
results & the results nor evaluation of the results and made a
recommended make any viable results but didn’t cogent argument
course(s) of counter- choose a viable for the selected
action (COA) arguments COA that would COA
resolve the
problem
Note: Total 28
Score is 50
points
(Score x 2)
Test VI . pawakil, villagonzalo, costello
Varied Case Study
Case Study Evaluation Rubric
Criteria Score =2 Score=4 Score=5 Score
Needs satisfactory outstanding
improvement
Identify/define Failed to identify Identified Clearly identified 5
the main the root problem, contributing factors the root problem,
problem and/or and did not but did not and provided clear
main issue indicate any recognize the root insight into the
causal factors cause causal factors
Determining the Did not identify Identified some of Clearly & 5
relevant relevant the relevant completely
information to information that information that determined the
address the would assist in would assist in relevant information
problem/issue resolving the resolving the issue needed to address
issue the problem
Generate Failed to develop Developed Developed at least 4
hypotheses & discrete, alternative three discrete,
construct sound alternative course(s) of action viable COAs, and
and coherent courses of action (COAs), but they build solid
arguments fail to respond fully arguments to
related to the to the root support their
solving of the issue(s)/problem(s statements
case problem(s) )
Testing Failed to Develop Developed an Developed a Clear, 4
hypotheses & a Viable argument that concise, Argument
making counter- Argument or supported one Or and fully compared
arguments Compare more COAs But the alternative
alternative COAs didn’t make A COAs
compelling
argument
Evaluating the Did not evaluate Offered an Fully evaluated the 4
results & the results nor evaluation of the results and made a
recommended make any viable results but didn’t cogent argument
course(s) of counter- choose a viable for the selected
action (COA) arguments COA that would COA
resolve the
problem
Note: Total 44
Score is 50
points
(Score x 2)
Test VI. taborada, dalisay, Kenneth tano ,madijanon
Varied Case Study
Case Study Evaluation Rubric
Criteria Score =2 Score=4 Score=5 Score
Needs satisfactory outstanding
improvement
Identify/define Failed to identify Identified Clearly identified 4
the main the root problem, contributing factors the root problem,
problem and/or and did not but did not and provided clear
main issue indicate any recognize the root insight into the
causal factors cause causal factors
Determining the Did not identify Identified some of Clearly & 4
relevant relevant the relevant completely
information to information that information that determined the
address the would assist in would assist in relevant information
problem/issue resolving the resolving the issue needed to address
issue the problem
Generate Failed to develop Developed Developed at least 4
hypotheses & discrete, alternative three discrete,
construct sound alternative course(s) of action viable COAs, and
and coherent courses of action (COAs), but they build solid
arguments fail to respond fully arguments to
related to the to the root support their
solving of the issue(s)/problem(s statements
case problem(s) )
Testing Failed to Develop Developed an Developed a Clear, 4
hypotheses & a Viable argument that concise, Argument
making counter- Argument or supported one Or and fully compared
arguments Compare more COAs But the alternative
alternative COAs didn’t make A COAs
compelling
argument
Evaluating the Did not evaluate Offered an Fully evaluated the 4
results & the results nor evaluation of the results and made a
recommended make any viable results but didn’t cogent argument
course(s) of counter- choose a viable for the selected
action (COA) arguments COA that would COA
resolve the
problem
Note: Total 40
Score is 50
points
(Score x 2)
Test VI . Performance Task
Varied Case Study
Case Study Evaluation Rubric
Criteria Score =2 Score=4 Score=5 Score
Needs satisfactory outstanding
improvement
Identify/define Failed to identify Identified Clearly identified
the main the root problem, contributing factors the root problem,
problem and/or and did not but did not and provided clear
main issue indicate any recognize the root insight into the
causal factors cause causal factors
Determining the Did not identify Identified some of Clearly &
relevant relevant the relevant completely
information to information that information that determined the
address the would assist in would assist in relevant information
problem/issue resolving the resolving the issue needed to address
issue the problem
Generate Failed to develop Developed Developed at least
hypotheses & discrete, alternative three discrete,
construct sound alternative course(s) of action viable COAs, and
and coherent courses of action (COAs), but they build solid
arguments fail to respond fully arguments to
related to the to the root support their
solving of the issue(s)/problem(s statements
case problem(s) )
Testing Failed to Develop Developed an Developed a Clear,
hypotheses & a Viable argument that concise, Argument
making counter- Argument or supported one Or and fully compared
arguments Compare more COAs But the alternative
alternative COAs didn’t make A COAs
compelling
argument
Evaluating the Did not evaluate Offered an Fully evaluated the
results & the results nor evaluation of the results and made a
recommended make any viable results but didn’t cogent argument
course(s) of counter- choose a viable for the selected
action (COA) arguments COA that would COA
resolve the
problem
Note: Total
Score is 50
points
(Score x 2)
Test VI . Performance Task
Varied Case Study
Case Study Evaluation Rubric
Criteria Score =2 Score=4 Score=5 Score
Needs satisfactory outstanding
improvement
Identify/define Failed to identify Identified Clearly identified
the main the root problem, contributing factors the root problem,
problem and/or and did not but did not and provided clear
main issue indicate any recognize the root insight into the
causal factors cause causal factors
Determining the Did not identify Identified some of Clearly &
relevant relevant the relevant completely
information to information that information that determined the
address the would assist in would assist in relevant information
problem/issue resolving the resolving the issue needed to address
issue the problem
Generate Failed to develop Developed Developed at least
hypotheses & discrete, alternative three discrete,
construct sound alternative course(s) of action viable COAs, and
and coherent courses of action (COAs), but they build solid
arguments fail to respond fully arguments to
related to the to the root support their
solving of the issue(s)/problem(s statements
case problem(s) )
Testing Failed to Develop Developed an Developed a Clear,
hypotheses & a Viable argument that concise, Argument
making counter- Argument or supported one Or and fully compared
arguments Compare more COAs But the alternative
alternative COAs didn’t make A COAs
compelling
argument
Evaluating the Did not evaluate Offered an Fully evaluated the
results & the results nor evaluation of the results and made a
recommended make any viable results but didn’t cogent argument
course(s) of counter- choose a viable for the selected
action (COA) arguments COA that would COA
resolve the
problem
Note: Total
Score is 50
points
(Score x 2)
Test VI . Performance Task
Varied Case Study
Case Study Evaluation Rubric
Criteria Score =2 Score=4 Score=5 Score
Needs satisfactory outstanding
improvement
Identify/define Failed to identify Identified Clearly identified
the main the root problem, contributing factors the root problem,
problem and/or and did not but did not and provided clear
main issue indicate any recognize the root insight into the
causal factors cause causal factors
Determining the Did not identify Identified some of Clearly &
relevant relevant the relevant completely
information to information that information that determined the
address the would assist in would assist in relevant information
problem/issue resolving the resolving the issue needed to address
issue the problem
Generate Failed to develop Developed Developed at least
hypotheses & discrete, alternative three discrete,
construct sound alternative course(s) of action viable COAs, and
and coherent courses of action (COAs), but they build solid
arguments fail to respond fully arguments to
related to the to the root support their
solving of the issue(s)/problem(s statements
case problem(s) )
Testing Failed to Develop Developed an Developed a Clear,
hypotheses & a Viable argument that concise, Argument
making counter- Argument or supported one Or and fully compared
arguments Compare more COAs But the alternative
alternative COAs didn’t make A COAs
compelling
argument
Evaluating the Did not evaluate Offered an Fully evaluated the
results & the results nor evaluation of the results and made a
recommended make any viable results but didn’t cogent argument
course(s) of counter- choose a viable for the selected
action (COA) arguments COA that would COA
resolve the
problem
Note: Total
Score is 50
points
(Score x 2)
Test VI . Performance Task
Varied Case Study
Case Study Evaluation Rubric
Criteria Score =2 Score=4 Score=5 Score
Needs satisfactory outstanding
improvement
Identify/define Failed to identify Identified Clearly identified
the main the root problem, contributing factors the root problem,
problem and/or and did not but did not and provided clear
main issue indicate any recognize the root insight into the
causal factors cause causal factors
Determining the Did not identify Identified some of Clearly &
relevant relevant the relevant completely
information to information that information that determined the
address the would assist in would assist in relevant information
problem/issue resolving the resolving the issue needed to address
issue the problem
Generate Failed to develop Developed Developed at least
hypotheses & discrete, alternative three discrete,
construct sound alternative course(s) of action viable COAs, and
and coherent courses of action (COAs), but they build solid
arguments fail to respond fully arguments to
related to the to the root support their
solving of the issue(s)/problem(s statements
case problem(s) )
Testing Failed to Develop Developed an Developed a Clear,
hypotheses & a Viable argument that concise, Argument
making counter- Argument or supported one Or and fully compared
arguments Compare more COAs But the alternative
alternative COAs didn’t make A COAs
compelling
argument
Evaluating the Did not evaluate Offered an Fully evaluated the
results & the results nor evaluation of the results and made a
recommended make any viable results but didn’t cogent argument
course(s) of counter- choose a viable for the selected
action (COA) arguments COA that would COA
resolve the
problem
Note: Total
Score is 50
points
(Score x 2)
Test VI . Performance Task
Varied Case Study
Case Study Evaluation Rubric
Criteria Score =2 Score=4 Score=5 Score
Needs satisfactory outstanding
improvement
Identify/define Failed to identify Identified Clearly identified
the main the root problem, contributing factors the root problem,
problem and/or and did not but did not and provided clear
main issue indicate any recognize the root insight into the
causal factors cause causal factors
Determining the Did not identify Identified some of Clearly &
relevant relevant the relevant completely
information to information that information that determined the
address the would assist in would assist in relevant information
problem/issue resolving the resolving the issue needed to address
issue the problem
Generate Failed to develop Developed Developed at least
hypotheses & discrete, alternative three discrete,
construct sound alternative course(s) of action viable COAs, and
and coherent courses of action (COAs), but they build solid
arguments fail to respond fully arguments to
related to the to the root support their
solving of the issue(s)/problem(s statements
case problem(s) )
Testing Failed to Develop Developed an Developed a Clear,
hypotheses & a Viable argument that concise, Argument
making counter- Argument or supported one Or and fully compared
arguments Compare more COAs But the alternative
alternative COAs didn’t make A COAs
compelling
argument
Evaluating the Did not evaluate Offered an Fully evaluated the
results & the results nor evaluation of the results and made a
recommended make any viable results but didn’t cogent argument
course(s) of counter- choose a viable for the selected
action (COA) arguments COA that would COA
resolve the
problem
Note: Total
Score is 50
points
(Score x 2)
Test VI . Performance Task
Varied Case Study
Case Study Evaluation Rubric
Criteria Score =2 Score=4 Score=5 Score
Needs satisfactory outstanding
improvement
Identify/define Failed to identify Identified Clearly identified
the main the root problem, contributing factors the root problem,
problem and/or and did not but did not and provided clear
main issue indicate any recognize the root insight into the
causal factors cause causal factors
Determining the Did not identify Identified some of Clearly &
relevant relevant the relevant completely
information to information that information that determined the
address the would assist in would assist in relevant information
problem/issue resolving the resolving the issue needed to address
issue the problem
Generate Failed to develop Developed Developed at least
hypotheses & discrete, alternative three discrete,
construct sound alternative course(s) of action viable COAs, and
and coherent courses of action (COAs), but they build solid
arguments fail to respond fully arguments to
related to the to the root support their
solving of the issue(s)/problem(s statements
case problem(s) )
Testing Failed to Develop Developed an Developed a Clear,
hypotheses & a Viable argument that concise, Argument
making counter- Argument or supported one Or and fully compared
arguments Compare more COAs But the alternative
alternative COAs didn’t make A COAs
compelling
argument
Evaluating the Did not evaluate Offered an Fully evaluated the
results & the results nor evaluation of the results and made a
recommended make any viable results but didn’t cogent argument
course(s) of counter- choose a viable for the selected
action (COA) arguments COA that would COA
resolve the
problem
Note: Total
Score is 50
points
(Score x 2)