Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
1/16/20
2
1/16/20
© 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-16 © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-17
3
1/16/20
© 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-18 © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-19
© 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-22 © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-23
4
1/16/20
© 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-24 © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-25
© 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-28 © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-29
5
1/16/20
© 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-32 © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-33
© 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-34 © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-35
6
1/16/20
© 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-36 © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-37
$60.00
B
2 325 200 Which project $40.00
$20.00
should you accept
$0.00
IRR 19.43% 22.17% and why? ($20.00) 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3
($40.00)
NPV 64.05 60.74
Discount Rate
© 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-38 © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-39
© 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-40 © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-41
7
1/16/20
© 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-42 © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-43
© 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-44 © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-45
8
1/16/20
© 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-48 © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-49
MIRR Method #2
MIRR Example - Continued The Reinvestment Approach
• Using Method #1, the cash flow at year 3 • All cash flows (positive and negative) except the first
would be discounted back to year 0 at 15% are compounded out to the end of the project’s life
• The cash flows would look like this: and then the IRR is calculated
• The cash flows would look like this:
Year 0: -$90,000 - $150,000/(1.153)
Year 0: -$90,000
= -$188,627.43
Year 1: $0
Year 1: $132,000
Year 2: $0
Year 2: $100,000 Year 3: $-$150,000 + $100,000(1.15) +
Year 3: $0 $132,000(1.152)
• MIRR using Method #1 is 15.77% • MIRR using Method #2 is 15.75%
© 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-52 © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-53
9
1/16/20
MIRR Method #3
The Combination Approach
MIRR vs. IRR
• All negative cash flows are discounted back to the • MIRR can handle non-conventional cash flows,
present and all positive cash flows are
compounded out to the end of the project’s life whereas the IRR can’t
• The cash flows would look like this: • But there are problems with MIRR:
Year 0: -$90,000 - $150,000/(1.153) • There are three methods, and three different
= -$188,627.43 MIRRs. Which MIRR is correct? The differences could
Year 1: $0 be larger on a more complex project
Year 2: $0 • MIRR is a rate of return on a modified set of cash flows,
Year 3: $100,000(1.15) + $132,000(1.152) not the project’s actual cash flows
= $289,570 • Since the MIRR depends on an externally supplied
discount rate, the result is not truly an “internal” rate of
• MIRR using Method #3 is 15.36%
return
© 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-54 © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education Limited. All Rights Reserved. 9-55
10