QUALITATIVE CONTENT ANALYSIS

No. Article Info Introduction Literature Research Discussion Conclusion

Review Method
1. Title: 1. Sufficient 1. The authors 1. The 1. The 1. Within
The Impact abstract describe the authors are authors the
Of description theory of TPB using don’t conclusion,
Entrepreneu and important and tech quantitative provide a the authors
rship points are theories from method with clear reason reveals the
Education relevant to the several supporting why he final result
On The problems experts. instruments chooses of the study
Entrepreneu being of surveys or Ajzen that goes
rial investigated 2. According quiz. theory in along with
Intention Of and observed. to Ajzen, the describing Ajzen
Students In role of EE in 2. The the role of theory. And
Science And 2. The absence the formation analysis is EE towards the result is
Engineering of statistical of EI is that done in two EI. matched
Versus data TPB will stages. Once well with
Business supporting EE provide a solid is designed 2. As the the
Studies (Entrepreneurs and strong for science description hypothesis
University hip Education) theoretical and written in of the
Programs and EI foundation.Thi engineering the research.
(Entrepreneurs s is basedon students. opening,
Authors: hip the saying that Another one the authors
Daniela Determination one’s future is for is more
Maresch, ) leads to behavioris business focused on
Rainer further determined by students. describing
Harms, investigation his action and the TPB
Norbert to the research. will: The when
Kailer, and stronger his compared
Birgit 3. The reason will is, the to
Wimmer- why the bigger the technology.
Wurm authors is possibility will
conducting the be. There are 3
Published in: research (and major points
Technologic investigation) that become
al is because of the focus of
Forecasting trusted the research:
& Social findings and 1) behavior
Change 104 theories are toward action
(2016)172- appearing, 2) subjective
179 attracting norms
authors’s 3) behavioral
http://dx.doi. attention to control.
org/10.1016/ analyze the
j.techfore.20 relation of EE 3. Becker
15.11.006 and EI within reveals
0040- the scope of different
1625/© 2015 science things. There
Elsevier Inc. students versus are several
All rights business theories
reserved. students. supporting the
claim that EE
4. Within the has an
research of EE important role
and EI,the in EI in terms
authors is of: (i) human
describing 2 resource
different theory, and (2)
conditions: Self efficacy.
1) The authors
is looking into In human
the manner, resource
norms, theory, the
subjectivity, basic platform
and behavioral for business
control of covers skills
students that and knowledge
are considered needed by
appropriate individuals
and right to be through
entrepreneurs. schools,
professional
2) Especially training, and
for science and experience –
technical or equivalent
students, to it.
entrepreneursh
ip activities In Self
are believed to efficacy, it is
create new but about one’s
qualifiedcorpo belief and
ration or confidence
business that he will be
bringing able to
positive effects manage and
to economy perform
and the entrepreneural
business ship roles (and
sector. With tasks).
this new
finding, 4. The authors
human describe the
resources are hypothesis
transformed completely,
into a new along with
tech-based charts that can
resources and help to clear
energy. out the
description
and
explanation.
2. Title: 1. The abstract 1. The theory 1. The 1. The 1. The
An description is of authors are description conclusion
Exploratory sufficient, entrepreneursh using of indicator is clear
Study Of covering ip explorative done by the enough
Entrepreneu relevant determination research authors although
rial keywords and in this scope is method as doesn’t the source
Intention points of the developed by well as include or theory
Among problems Shapero and survey. clear theory being used
University being Sokol. Questionaire or source. remain
Students In investigated. Accoring to s are unclear or
Ghana EE designed and 2. The vague.
2. The purpose (Entrepreneuri managed description
Authors: of the research al Event) with 731 is good 2. The
Richmell is to discuss theiry, the samples of because of research
Baaba factors crucial university the focuses on
Amanamah, affecting the affecting students in complete the
Augustine purpose of factors include Ghana. explanation contributin
Acheampon, entrepreneursh the will, and the g factors
and ip of students considering 2. The statistics. that affect
Emmanuel in Ghana. the interesting authors don’t The authors the will to
Kofi Owusu parts related to provide even start a
3. The reason business enough describe the business of
Published in: for the authors startup tasks details about result of the students in
International to do the and becomes the research answers in Ghana. It is
Journal Of research is to entrepreneurs, procedure the form of expected
Scientific & develop the ability to being charts that that the
Technology activities in start a new implemented help a lot to research
Research Ghana related business, and . comprehen can help
Volume 7, to the business d the students (in
Issue 1, entrepreneursh opportunity. 3. The content. Ghana) to
January ip curriculum collected grow into
2018 and Ajzen theory data will be 3. From the innovative
government (as the one processed double business
ISSN: policies to shared from with SPSS regression, leaders that
2277-8616 improve the previous version 24. it is will help
entrepreneursh article) is revealed with
IJSTR©2018 ip activities in related to TPB 4. Within the that there Ghana’s
www.ijstr.or Ghana. that the research are 7 economy
g willingness is method, it is factors and
determined by stated that affecting entrepreneu
3 things: Bind entrepreneu rship
1) Behavior Variable (Y) rship will atmosphere
2) Subjective is related to among in the
norms entrepreneur Ghana’s future.
3) Behavioral alship students:
control. purpose 1. More
while Free Exposure to
2. The Variable (X) entrepreneu
determining is the factors rs and
factors are affecting the experience
divided into 2, entrepreneurs d network
internal factor hip will and 2.
and external determinatio Dissatisfact
factor. Internal n. ion with
factor covers previous
 by one’s job
characteristics 3.
while external Knowledge
factors are from
affected by entrepreneu
surroundings rship
and 4. Utilise
environment. market
opportuniti
3. In the es
overall 5. Dodge
coverage, the retirement
theoretical 6. Desire to
platform is earn money
good enough 7. Career
because advanceme
everything has nt.
been
specifically
described
along with the
reliable
sources.

3. Title: 1. Abstract 1. The study is 1. The 1. The The

Entrepreneu description is enough method is result of the research
rial enough but the because every using smart research is reveals the
Intentions detailed points variable is PLS 2.0 from to prove theoretical
Amongst are not described with 318 female that and
Female relevant to the reliable MBA entrepreneu practical
Students: problems sources. students rship implication
Test Of A being from 5 education s
Moderated investigated. 2. There is no private can help 1) Based on
Model In An The authors clear universities students, the
Emerging can actually explanation in Kuala especially theories,
Economy add one more within Lumpur, women, to the research
variable, entrepreneursh Malaysia. improve has
Authors: which is the ip intention The their skills objected
Umair risk-taking about the quetionaires in the
Ahmed, propensity relationship of have been entreprenur significant
Munwar because it is self-efficacy, distributed ship sector. role and
Hussain related to most risk-taking from May to contributio
Pahi, dan of the contents propensity, June 2017. 2. Within n of self-
Soleman – in the and the trial efficacy
Mozammel. abstract, entrepreneurial 2. The period for and
hypothesis, education to authors also entrepreneu entreprener
Published in: and the interview the rship uship risks
The Turkish discussion. entrepreneursh related MBA education related to
Online ip intention. students moderation the interest
Journal of 2. The purpose concerning with in starting a
Design, Art of the authors 3. Hypothesis the contents entrepreneu business. In
and in doing the description is in rship self- the theory
Communicat research is to good because entrepreneurs efficacy by Usman
ion – describe the it goes along hip study. and risk- (2015), it is
TOJDAC, prediction of with the taking clearly
 September entrepreneursh purpose of the 3. The propensity, stating that
2018 Special ip opportunity research. authors don’t the result is entrepreneu
Edition, among explain the zero. It rship self-
p.3080-3091 women. indicators of means that efficacy
questionaires there is no and risk-
3. The authors they perform entrepreneu taking
ISSN: don’t provide so the rship element
2146-5193 clear reason research education must be
why he procedures moderation used by
DOI NO: chooses aren’t really found in women
10.7456/108 women clear or the result. students to
0SSE/385 population. understood In other motivate
Whereas from by the words, the them who
the sources he readers. respondent want to
got, it is only doesn’t find pursue
37% of the any value positive
population of of business
women entrepreneu prospects in
running the rship the future.
business. From education
business in making 2) Based on
population in use of the the
Malaysia,it is entrepreneu practical
only 48.4% rship self- element,
efficacy. the finding
4. The authors focuses on
didn’t explain two
the reason why supporting
he chooses policies, the
self-efficacy importance
variable and of
the individual
entrepreneursh psyhologica
ip education as l
the free improveme
variable. nt among
women in
5. The authors self-
describe the efficacy
previous and the
literature and tendency to
emphiric take risks.
evidence but It will help
he doesn’t women to
include the gain
sources or the knowledge
name of the and the
researchers responsive
revealing the actions in
claim. improving
entrepreneu
rship.

4. Title: 1. Abstract 1.The authors 1. The 1.This Further

Influence Of description is highlight research conclusion research is
Work enough and Ajzen method used was required to
History On the keyword concerning by the supported gain
Entrepreneu points are TPB variable authors are by the a deeper
rial relevant to the which is A surveys to collinearity understandi
Intentions problems central collect the statistics ng of why
In 'Prime being principle that data was provided by older
Age' And investigated. TPB is the designed SPSS as individuals
'Third Age': idea that specifically part of the with a
A 2. The purpose intentions have to consider Regression background
Preliminary of the research three Entrepreneur analysis. in ‘blue-
Study is to conceptually ial intentions collar’
investigate the independent in the 2. The Industrial
Authorss: relationship determinants: working-age result work are
Teemu between an attitude population. concerning less
Kautonen, individual’s towards the The data TPB : attracted to
Seppo Luoto socialization behaviour, a used in the entrepreneu entrepreneu
and Erno T. into different subjective study were rial rship than
Tornikoski professional norm and a collected as attitude, the Third
and perceived part of a subjective Age
Published in: organizational behavioural research norm and population
International cultures and control (Ajzen, project on perceived on average.
Small their 1991). Attitude  Ostrobothnia behavioural
Business subsequent towards the n control are
Journal, entrepreneurial behaviour entrepreneurs all
28(6), 583- intentions use refers to hip in the positively
601. age cohorts. the degree to provinces of and
which a person Central significantl
© SAGE 3. The authors has a Ostrobothnia y related to
Publications categorize the favourable or , entrepreneu
http://dx.doi. research based an Ostrobothnia rial
org/10.1177/ on two age unfavourable and South intentions. 
0266242610 categories: is evaluation or Ostrobothnia
368592 stronger in appraisal of in Western 3. The
‘Third Age’ the behaviour Finland in research
(50-64 years) in November outcome
than in question. Subj and from work
‘Prime Age’ ective December history
(20-49 years). norm stands 2006. variable:
for the The
4. The authors perceived 2. The empirical
describe the social questionaires analysis
reasons why pressure to indicator generated
they use 2 free perform or not done by the two
variables, the to perform that authors are principal
work history behaviour. Per using Ajzen findings
variable and ceived theory with regard
Theory of behavioural related to to the
Planned control TPB influence of
Behaviour. refers to the containing work
From the first perceived ease ‘entrepreneur history on
variable, work or difficulty of ial attitude’, entrepreneu
history is a performing the ‘perceived rial
relevant aspect behaviour. behavioural intentions.
of an 2.Meanwhile, control’, and First, the
individual’s the work ‘subjective results
life course history norm’. show that
from the point variable is of the three
of highlighted by 3. The broad
view of the 2 most authors categories
entrepreneursh dominant aren’t really of working
ip. For experts : The clear or environmen
example, Dyer concept of specific in ts included
(1994) work history is work history in the
contends that a multifaceted description study, only
certain work one and may and research a career in
experiences include aspects procedures ‘blue-
encourage such so the impact collar’
entrepreneurial as career of the industrial
behavior. mobility, research isn’t work has a
occupation, well defined significant
For the second displacement, in relation to impact on
variable: job satisfaction entrepreneurs the
According to and tenure hip intention. individual’s
the TPB, work (Bowen and subsequent
history does Hisrich, 1986; entrepreneu
not impact on Singh and rial
entrepreneurial Verma, 2003). intentions.
intentions This research This
directly, but follows the life negative
indirectly via course effect is
three further perspective mediated
variables. The (Settersten and by the
variables that Mayer, 1997) individual’s
carry the by focusing on lack of
influence of the belief in
work history individual’s their
to socialization own ability
entrepreneurial into the to start and
intentions professional run a
include and business as
‘entrepreneuri organizational well as the
al attitude’, culture in the missing
‘perceived type of support for
behavioural working enterprising
control’, and environment behaviour
‘subjective where they from the
norm’. have spent the people
majority of important
5. The authors their working to them.
describe that career. 
TPB variables Second, a
have a great 3.The final look into
impact to factor the age
entrepreneursh considered in cohorts
ip intention this study is included in
because of the the role of age the study
existence of in the revealed
theoretical relationship that work
platforms and between history
the supporting work history becomes a
findings.The and significant
outcome have entrepreneurial determinant
revealed the intentions. of
impact of TPB More entrepreneu
variable specifically, rial
towards the this analysis intentions
entrepreneursh compares only at the
ip intention. the impact of late
work history career
on subsequent stage. None
entrepreneurial of the work
intentions in history
two age variables
cohorts: reached
Prime Age statistical
(20-49 years) significanc
and Third Age e in the
(50-64 years) Prime Age
(Hart et al., (20-49
2004; years) sub-
Kautonen, sample,
2008). whereas
having
4. The overall spent one’s
highlight of career in
the study is ‘blue-
good because collar’
the authors can industrial
analyze the work had a
theory of significant
every variable negative
while effect on
connecting one entrepreneu
variable to rial
another. intentions
in the
5. The authors Third Age
can also (50-64
describe the years).
hypothesis In other
clearly and in words, it
details. seems that
one reason
for the
negative
association
between a
career in
‘blue-
collar’
industrial
work and
late-career
entrepreneu
 rial
intentions
is the lack
of support
from the
individual’s
social
contacts
including
friends,
family and
colleagues.

5. Title: 1. Abstract 1. Feasibility 1. The 1. The 1.The

The Effect description is and Desire authors use acceptance model in
of clear enough Theories are Quantitative of the this
Entrepreneu but the highlighted by research overall research
rship keyword Sommer and method to hypothesis can be
Education points aren’t Haug, while examine the test shows improved
on relevant to the TPB is influence of that almost by
Entrepreneu problems highlighted by entrepreneurs all modifying
rial being Ajzen. hip respondents some
Intention of investigated. According to education, recognize significant
University The authors Sommer and social norms the constructs
Students by can add one Haug, the and self- importance and number
Adopting more variable, perception of efficacy on of of construct
Linan which is the feasibility was intentions to entrepreneu enhanceme
Model entrepreneursh included as the pursue rship, even nts for
ip education, basis of self- business though they further
Authorss: because the knowledge ventures by are still research.
Yud Buana, topic can be competency to adopting young. Last, it
Desman found in the feel and to Linan model would be
Hidayat, contents – plan the of intention- 2. Related better if the
Budi Prayogi within the intention to behavior. to further
and Vendy. abstract, carry out reliability research
hypothesis, certain 2. The and makes
Published in: and discussion behavior. The sample is consistency determine
Binus result. emergence of selected in of aspects that
Business a desire is accordance entrepreneu can affect
Review, 2. The purpose planning with the rial entrepreneu
8(1), May of this behavior presence of knowledge, rial
2017, 67-75 research is to towards students personal intentions
measure the something that during the attitude, to give
P-ISSN: influence of is considered academic social better
2087-1228 entrepreneurial beneficial for year of 2015- norms, results.
E-ISSN: knowledge to individuals 2016. As selfefficacy
2476-9053 the factors that Hence, there is participants , and level
drive the hope that both of the of self-
Copyright©2 intentions of them are program, agreement
017 according to recognized to they have to the
http://dx.doi. Ajzen’s bepositively been given intention of
org/10.21512 TPB.Regardin associated the entrepreneu
/bbr.v8i1.195 g the pattern of with opportunity rship
8 relationships entrepreneurial to establish among
in the Linan intentions. their students,
model, the role business as a respectivel
of the personal 2. According group y are good
attitudes to TPB Theory assignment in
perceived by by Ajzen, at the accordance
environment Theory of beginning of with the
as social planned the program. rule of
norms and behavior thumb
self-efficacy, describes the 3. The shows
known as PBC actions of questionnaire analysis
is important in individuals consists of that is
perceived regarding two parts. carried out
businesses in intentions. It is The first part in several
the long term also about how consists of stages.
by adopting to build questions First, it is
TPB. The relationships about to test H1.
pattern of between respondents’ It
relationships attitudes and demographic investigates
in the model is behavior. profile. the impact
focused on the Personal Meanwhile, of
aspect to know attitude toward the second education
the behavior section has on
entrepreneurial explains that a 30 questions entrepreneu
intentions. person has including rial
favorable or knowledge intentions.
unfavorable of Second,
evaluations entrepreneurs H2a and
about what is hip (5), H2b are
the focus in personal about the
individuals’ attitude (6), impact of
mind. social norms education
(8), self- on
3. Overall, the efficacy (4) perceived
study is and desirability,
enough entrepreneuri represented
because all the al intention by personal
theories (7). attitude and
described Furthermore, social
come from the data are norms.
reliable analyzed by Third, it
sources and using tests the H3
accompanied standard or the
by charts statistical impact of
discussing procedures education
Linan Model with the on
related to statistical perceived
Entrepreneurs analyzer feasibility.
hip Intention. software. Last, the
impact of
4. Overall, perceived
the research feasibility
methodologi on
es are entrepreneu
complete and rial
the intentions
procedures or H4.
 are clear.
2. The
description
is detailed
and clear,
accompanie
d by
reliable and
trusted
indicators.

6. Title: 1. Abstract 1. In terms of 1. The data 1. To 1. The

Identifying description is personality were identify implementa
Factors that enough and factor, the analyzed which tion of this
Affecting the keyword authors aimed using factors study was
the points are on three descriptive contribute to verify
Entrepreneu relevant to the factors related statistics and most to the factors
rial problems to personality inferential entrepreneu that
Intention being as the core statistics.Usi rship as a affecting
among investigated. predictors of ng stratified career the
Engineering entrepreneurial random choice A entrepreneu
Technology 2. The aim of intention: need sampling, the multiple rial
Students this study was for samples were regression intention
to identify the achievement, taken from was among
Authors: factors that locus of eight computed engineering
Salwah Che affecting the control, and campuses of to predict technology
Mat, Siti entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Universiti entrepreneu students. It
Mistima intention Kuala rial is found
Maat, and among 2. The authors Lumpur with intention as that the
Norhatta engineering don’t describe 357 males a career engineering
Mohd. technology related studies students and choice technology
students. to the keyword 197 are based on students
Published in: points on both females. Attitude have high
Procedia - 3. The reasons abstract and towards attitudes
Social and for the authors the Research Entreprene towards
Behavioral to do the background. instrument urship, entrepreneu
Sciences research is They only used is a set Perceived rship
211 ( 2015 ) because of the discuss the of Support compared
1016 – 1022 fact that literature about questionnaire and to other
entrepreneursh the personality on Barriers, factors such
ip has become factor and Entrepreneur Locus of as support
1877-0428 © a very Instrumental ial Intention Control, and
2015 The prominent Readiness. (EIQ) with 5 Need for resistance,
Authorss. subject in points Likert Achieveme locus of
DOI: secondary and 3. There is an scales which nt, control,
10.1016/j.sbs tertiary ambiguous consists of Instrumenta need for
pro.2015.11. education variable. The 54 questions l Readiness achievemen
135 systems. It is authors was and t,
hoped that by describe that distributed to Subjective entrepreneu
studying this there is a 554 students Norms. A rship
subject, background of Universiti significant intention,
students will showing that Kuala regression the
acquire the personality Lumpur. The equation instrumenta
basic and questionnaire was found l readiness
knowledge and environment was adapted with R2 of and
gain interest to factor are from 0.548. This subjective
become affecting the Kristiansen indicates norm.
potential entrepreneursh and Indarti that 54.8%
entrepreneurs ip intention. (2004) and entrepreneu
after they However, if used widely rial
graduated. you see the by many intention
study researchers was
4. The authors description, in the same explained
highlight the they study field. by the
factors that description There are independen
affect the they don’t seven t variables.
entrepreneursh yang mention constructs Sisanya,
ip intention on anything about that include Other
the environmental Attitude factors that
background. factor related towards might
The factors to Entrepreneur contribute
include entrepreneursh ship, to the
personality ip intention. Perceived findings are
and Support and factors that
surrounding Barriers, have not
environments. Locus of been tested
Control, such as
5. The Need for gender,
discussed Achievement family
background is , business
relatively short Entrepreneur background
so there isn’t ial Intention, , facilities
enough Instrumental and
description for Readinessan environmen
its relation in d Subjective t of the
the topic, Norms. campus,
especially support
concerning the 2. The source from the
correlation for manageme
between one questionaire nt and
variable and indicator is knowledge
others. unclear. In of
terms of entrepreneu
research rship
methodology education.
, the
procedure 2. From the
used is research, it
unclear and is
the source concluded
itself is still that the
vague. factors that
contribute
most to
entrepreneu
rship as a
career
choice are
Locus of
Control
 Need for
Achieveme
nt,
Instrumenta
l Readiness
and
Subjective
Norms.

7. Title: 1. Abstract 1. Theory of 1. The The authors The article

Determinant description is planned population of don’t is helpful in
s of enough and behavior this study describe the developing
Entrepreneu the keyword (TPB) was comprises of result of the sufficiently
rial points are developed by full-time research. wide
Intention relevant to the Ajzen (1991) undergraduat literature
Among problems as an e students at that is quite
Millennial being extension to a well- helpful in
Generation investigated.H theory of known providing
owever, the reasoned public insight
Authors: content of action (TRA) university in related to
Wei-Loon abstract is not by Fishbein Malaysia. entrepreneu
Koe, Juan enough and Ajzen Post- rship
Rizal Sa’ari, because the (1975). graduate intention of
Izaidin authors don’t According to students are millennial
Abdul Majid, cover the Ajzen (1991), excluded generation.
and research intention is from the However,
Kamariah methodology directly study simply the authors
Ismail being used and affected by because (in general)
the result of it. three majority of have to
antecedents, them do not describe the
Published in: 2. The authors they are: (i) meet the result of
Procedia - describe the attitude; (ii) requirement their
Social and reason for subjective of research
Behavioral doing the norm and; (iii) “millennial because
Sciences 40 research on perceived generation”. they are
( 2012 ) 197 entrepreneursh behavioral describing
– 208 ip intention control. In 2. The the research
because other words, instrument to methodolog
1877-0428 © Though the three be used in y which is
2012 entrepreneurial factors this study is supposed to
DOI: intention has mentioned questionnaire bring an
10.1016/j.sbs been widely above directly . All items in effect to the
pro.2012.03. studied by affect a questionnaire study.
181 scholars from person’s s are to be
overseas, the intention to developed by
question of perform a referring to
their behavior. The past
applicability in authors further literatures.
the local explains that Specifically,
setting still TPB can be seven-point
remains.To applied in Likert-scale
date, intention many areas of questions
of young interests, will be
generation, specifically in designed.
specifically the understanding 3. All data
millennial certain collected will
generation in behaviors, then be
our country to such as keyed into
embark on purchasing computer for
entrepreneursh behaviors, further
ip continues to leisure analysis. The
be unclear. behavior, study will
drinking use SPSS
3. This journal behavior etc. 18.0 and
proposes a AMOS 18.0
research 2. The authors to analyze
framework by describe the the data
extending theory collected.
Ajzen's (1991) complete with The first
theory of well- phase of data
planned composed analysis will
behavior research be performed
(TPB) to study diagrams by SPSS to
entrepreneurial related to the obtain the
intention research and descriptive
among development statistical
millennial of hypothesis. results, such
generation. The authors as means,
Specifically, also highlight standard
knowledge, the study deviations,
experience and going along to Cronbach’s
ties are the the alphas and
independent background exploratory
variables; and the factor
meanwhile, abstract analysis
attitude, social concluding: (EFA).
norm, As mentioned Meanwhile,
perceived by Sommer AMOS will
behavioral and Haug be used in
control and (2011) and van the second
personality Gelderen et al. phase for
traits act as the (2008), TPB is structural
mediating indeed a good equation
variables. and useful modeling
model to (SEM)
explain purposes; in
entrepreneurial which
intention; measurement
however, model,
extending the structural
basic model by model and
adding in new hypotheses
variables does will be
make sense. tested.
As such, in
addition to the
original three
variables,
personality
trait is added
 as an
additional
variable that
influences
intention.
Moreover,
knowledge,
past
experience and
ties are
included as
variables that
influence the
intention
directly and
indirectly. The
following
sections
explain the
research model
in details.

8. Title: 1. The 1. The authors In this part, The authors 1. The

Pengaruh abstract is don’t include the authors have conclusion
Pendidikan enough. The the name of describe the interpreted and the
Kewirausah authors have the study research the result of outcome of
aan, included two chapter, in procedures the research the study
Parental, languages as which they being used in a go along
dan Locus well as the don’t directly clearly. detailed with the
Of Control proper include the manner by result of the
Terhadap keywords combinations displaying analysis
Niat related to the of various the specific and the
Berwirausa title of the study output and purpose of
ha research,which references and by the research
Mahasiswa is sourcecs in the implementi (previously
entrepreneurs opening. ng the mentioned).
Authorss: hip education, original
I Kade Aris parental, locus 2. In the point of 2. The
Friatnawan of control, journal about view within authors
Dusak and entrepreneurs “The Impact the provide
Ida Bagus hip intention. of theoretical suggestions
Sudiksa Entrepreneur platform as a follow-
2. The authors ship and the up actions
Published in: don’t describe Education, previous based on
E-Jurnal clearly the Parental, and emphirical the
Manajemen background of Locus Of studies. conclusion
Unud-Vol. 5, the problem Control to – taken
No.8, 2016: because there Students’ from the
5184-5214. is no specific Entrepreneur statements
data statistic ship or
that is relevant Intention” the implication
ISSN : to researchers are s in
2302-8912 entrepreneurs using relevant supporting
hip education, studies related entrepreneu
to the subject rship
 being activities.
parental, locus investigated,
of control, which is: In
entrepreneurs this part, there
hip intention. is theoretical
descrirption
3. The authors from various
don’t relate sources. There
those is also a
conditions to previous
the subject research that is
being relevant to the
observed. investigated
They only problem.
focus on
scientific 3. The authors
theories. also construct
conceptual
structure used
for the
research.

9. Title: 1. The 1. The authors The authors The authors 1. The

Latar construction is include related clearly describe the conclusion
Belakang good with study because describe the details of of analysis
Keluarga easy-to- each research the and the
Wirausaha understand investigated methodology outcome purpose of
dan Niat language. variable is with the supported the research
untuk supported by basis of by the have been
Berwirausa 2. The authors the existing Partial Least evidence delivered
ha describe the theory. They Square (PLS) and the clearly and
background of even provide a by using problem well.
the problem study related program discussion
Authorss: clearly and to each free SmartPLS 2. completely 2. The
Ida Asri accompany it variable (and – and authors also
Prastiwi and with specific its connection) clearly. providesug
Tri Siwi data statistic. to the trusted gestions as
Agustina They also theory. the follow-
include the up actions
Published in: theoretical 3. The authors based on
FRIMA studies that include the the gained
(Festival match the previous conclusions
Riset Ilmiah problems so it research as and
Manajemen will help the well as the statements
& Akuntansi. readers in supporting supporting
understanding hypothesis that the
the content (as strengthens the entrepreneu
ISSN : well as the existing rship
2614 – 6681 background). evidence for activities.
the research
being done.

10. Title: 1. Abstract 1. The authors 1. The 1.This This

Entrepreneu description is highlight TPB authors are research influence is
rial enough and theory because using found that partially
Intentions the keyword the theory of empirical if a third- mediated
In The points are planned analysis uses age by whether
Third Age: relevant to the behavior primary individual the
The Impact problems (Ajzen 1988, survey data perceives it individual
Of being 1991) has as well as as socially has a
Perceived investigated.H become one of secondary acceptable positive
Age Norms. owever, the the most regional data to be attitude
content of common from public entrepreneu toward
Authorss: abstract is not psychological databases in riallyactive entrepreneu
Teemu enough theories used Finland to atanyage,an rship, by
Kautonen, because the to explain and test the dinthethird how the
Erno T. authors don’t predict human hypotheses ageinpartic individual
Tornikoski, cover the behavior, outlined ular, such a perceives
and Ewald research including above. The perception their own
Kibler methodology entrepreneursh survey data exerts a ability to
being used. ip. were significant start and
Published in: The theory of collected as positive run a
Small Bus 2. The authors planned part of a influence business,
Econ (2011) are doing a behavior posits research on their by the
37:219–234 research to that intentions project on entrepreneu extent of
investigate the have three Ostrobothnia rial support
© Springer formation of conceptually n intention. from their
Science+Bus entrepreneurial independent entrepreneurs family and
iness Media, intentions in determinants hip in the 2. The friends they
LLC. 2009 the third age namely provinces of results in perceive
DOI: based on attitude toward Central this and by the
10.1007/s111 Ajzen’s (1988, the behavior, Ostrobothnia analysis importance
87-009- 1991) theory the subjective , point in this of that
9238-y of planned norm and Ostrobothnia direction, support to
behavior perceived and South since the them. Thus,
(TPB). behavioral Ostrobothnia entrepreneu if policy
control. in Western rial aims to
3. The authors Finland in environmen increase
provide the 2. The authors November t was found enterprising
reasons for describe the and to exert a activity in
choosing the theories December moderate the third-
third age in complete with 2006. influence age
this research conceptual on attitude, segment,
because there model 2. Data subjective the
is the construction processing norm and portfolio of
existence of and hypothesis being used entrepreneu instruments
emphirical development. by the rial intent. should
data analysis They also authors is the Further include
and the theory highlight the software research is measures
stating that the study related package required to that address
third age (45- to the SmartPLS examine people’s
64 years) is the background 2.0. these general
best age to and abstract. relationship awareness
focus on 3. Overall, s in more of third-age
entrepreneursh the authors detail. entrepreneu
ip. describe the However, rship as a
research the non- viable,
methodology finding in positive
specifically terms of the and
with trusted moderation attractive
sources, effect late-career
especially would option.
the suggest that
questionaire objective
indicators. measures of
entrepreneu
rship do not
set
conditions
that change
the way an
individual’s
perceptions
affect the
formation
of
entrepreneu
rial
intentions.

3.The
authors
have
entirely
describe the
result of the
research –
and it is
related to
the purpose
of the
research.

4. The
authors also
describe the
result of the
research
complete
with the
supported
reliable
theories
and from
previous
findings.