You are on page 1of 29

Giant Sized Fairy Elfin (Elven) Notes

Terence McKenna said that “the Jungians ruined everything,” in a jest like manner. This is an invitation
for an intellectual exercise in which particular aspects of Jungian's psychological works are promoted
and ushered by novices and naive people. However, Terence was also an amateur Jungian scholar since
around ten. During his lectures, though, he rarely mentioned Jung or his texts and concepts, and rather
relied on even older, more previous sources.

It's a pretty simple story. The value of activities changed, particularly that of reading. However, that is
assuming reading had some social value to begin with. As an activity we are introduced as children, it
is taken, perhaps mostly for granted. People like to live in the now rather than theory.
I used to have a particular theory, or you can even call it a belief. However, as time went on and my
writing apparently decreased from the public sphere, its effectiveness diminished, due to supply and
demand: people wanted it faster, and more of it in ever increasing amounts. This wasn't impossible. It
was just unreasonable and uncalled for, out of excitability and misunderstanding. It was the
misunderstanding I wanted to explain away once and for all, and that I couldn't wait to do so. However,
that had to wait until the book was completed because I refused to waste time shelling away producing
social media posts. It wasn't my style and never really was the intent insofar as having a blog. All of
that was years ago so the motivation was going away.

The pattern typically went something like this: talk or discussion on psychedelics, hallucinogens, and
psychoactive substances would occur, and the discussion would approach the topics of mushrooms
(psilocybin and psilocin), marijuana (Cannabis sativa or indica and hybrids as well as other THC
products), LSD, DMT (such as ayahuasca or the smoked freebase alkaloid), peyote, MDMA (and
MDA), as well as the remaining psychedelic drug products known and considered to be synthesized
experimental product. The talk would eventually lead to any visual “hallucinations” or what the
psychedelic substance led to. They would be described as beautiful, even transcendentally so. They
would be elf like in nature and twist your vision of the environment more as such. One would
eventually wonder how the subject's inner life could hold up or even compensate. Then the thought
process would turn to sex or what their romantic or love life were like. Then they would say the subject
could possibly not have been trying hard enough to fulfill it. In that way the synergy between the
psychedelics would be used.

There are some facts in Pihkal that are rarely discussed out in the open. Typically if you read a book
you can distinguish the plot from the rest of the text and be able to understand the story and what it's
about. There used to be a few different ways of describing reading, or the educational process, but as
the world's attitude (that is, the population's within it) shifted, these values also changed. If reading a
book for school, you'd be expected to stick to the prompt if required to write an essay. A similar thing
occurs during tests. Depending on the one, you may be required to write an essay on each topic, or just
choose one, that being a rule especially so during timed exams. Otherwise, as such, people tend to
remember different details depending on how they absorbed the work of art. To put it more explicitly,
different people sometimes have different favorite parts, not to mention, usually, unique personalities.
That does not mean a person in their default modus operandi remembers everything even though that
may be the goal. Some practical people accept the fact (or idea) that it isn't possible, at least not for
everyone. There is a savant on the elderly side who when reading a book has the ability to read a whole
page in one second just by looking at it. Similar stories exist of people getting hit in the head and
suddenly learning a new language such as Spanish, and getting fluent in it. However, this man then is
said to read many books in one day, remembering every detail. That is typically not something
everyone can do, regardless of IQ. If the opposite were the case, it would mean every student in school
performed satisfactory, and produced work of similar score. However, the only differences in such an
outcome would be from individual variability, caused by home life and background/upbringing – of
which not every person, in the same class or not, will experience exactly the same (the future, though,
might introduce memory implants using virtual reality technology so that citizens could
indistinguishably experience the memory and temporary reality of another individual human being). To
think it would be possible otherwise had always been considered common sense and understood to be
unlikely. Spoiler alerts are one things but so is lack of discretion in any conversation, open or not.
When writing, a detail can be something you mention in the writing, or not. If not mentioned, that
doesn't always mean the writer didn't know it or forgot. As I've said, it used to be that people typically
thought different parts to a movie or book were amusing. If they were really into it, they would “know
everything” about it. Something like that usually can take years. You don't study by waiting until the
day before something is due. That could mostly explain that unless someone wanted to keep certain
aspects or plot elements a secret, or reserve bringing anything like that up for special, certain reasons
such as seeing if anyone else talks about it first. Even though some of the following factoids about
Pihkal's plot don't fall under this category, some of them do. It's advertised to be the story between
Alexander (Sasha) Shulgin and Ann Shulgin, going by the pseudonyms Shura and Alice. If you read the
book you would know, and if you hadn't, you generally wouldn't, unless someone told you. The book
describes Shura's relationship with his first wife Helen before her death and his meeting Alice. He also
had a German colleague and his wife Ursula as correspondents. He and Ursula never hit it off despite
promising one another with vague intimations of doing so. They talked even while Shura and Alice
were together but ultimately broke off the communications once they realized it would never work.
Before they meet during Alice's part of the story she describes a sexual relationship she had with a
coworker she shared her earliest psychedelic experience with on peyote/mescaline. They were
coworkers at the hospital she worked at, having met there, she a psychoanalyst and he one of the
psychiatrists, who typically have a reputation relegated to easy work. That's all that's written about
what their relationship culminated to, the entire thing performed out of what mostly comes off as a
thing owed to a benefactor. If you never mentioned that, people can in anonymous ways use it against
you to mean you didn't read the book, remember those parts, or comprehend the plot past a certain
point to be an authority on the text and its interpretation. This highlights the trend nature of things. I
made it known that I liked Pihkal, the Shulgins, and was inspired by that whole thing. It didn't
necessarily make me more popular, or net me more women. Later on when I seemed to care a little bit
less after the years had passed, and I started to study other works to see if those would impress people
instead, is when interest by other people picked up. I was never able to talk to anyone about that book.
Random messages I'd leave online intimating about it wouldn't get any responses and would go
nowhere. Those attempts at starting a discussion were seen as the incorrect way of going about things.
Instead, it was expected of me, or other attempted discussions, to have already outlined and addressed
everything, not to mention all our thoughts and ideas, not just plot points other people would remember
and find relevant, and have answered all questions through anticipation.
A part of it was really seeing what “subconscious” or even “unconscious”, techniques people would do
to get attention or the people talking about them, mostly when they feel they haven't been in the
“spotlight” that much or as if people even pay attention to them more often than not. It was a trap you
were susceptible to falling into insofar as being affected by the outcome of something.
I started out at the top of my game with a bright outlook but once the ball got rolling, a few years later
the results weren't pretty. I wasn't doing too good and the fruits of my labor and effort weren't
bountiful.

The conditions for viewing red, green, and blue twinkling stars isn't always optimal. Two examples are
Vega in Lyra and Sirius in Sirius, also known as the Dogon star since as a people they are known for,
somehow, knowing it was a binary star system two thousand years before telescopes were in use.
New Age ideas have always been around since at least the alchemy days, in which alchemists
attempted to turn ordinary matter into gold. It's said that information had always been suppressed, so
that other ideas outside the normal sphere get criticized and can't be taken seriously when put in those
words or explicit expression.

Frogs in folk stories are said to be unclean animals. It has a history of being used in charms,
particularly love charms, such as sex, fertility, and bisexual curating. Some think of it as a male fertility
device but it's really a maternal animal figure used to help women in childbirth. Around the world there
are some traditions that treat springtime croaking of frogs as symbols of unborn children wailing, and
thus could be used as a concept for the soul of the unborn child. It's pretty common for a people to
believe all frogs are poisonous and associated with witches. This may be especially true in the United
Kingdom where the English are said to be the most mycophobic, hardly using the mushroom (fr.
champignon) in any of their national recipes, according to the Wassons. This mycophobic attitude,
possibly even having a genesis in the fear of frogs and toads, extends throughout a population and
sticks as myth and folklore get taken for an all encompassing truth. Some fairytales have the happy
endings to put a positive twist on the cultural pattern in which it references to make a difference and
hopefully spread some positivity to influence minds. Indeed the word toadstool comes from frogs'
association with mushrooms and the ground where they sprout. It was mostly used to lump the fungi
into a devilish category along with other haunted things like frogs and witches. The distinguishing
between hallucinogenic (typically psychedelic), toxic, deadly poisonous, edible, and choice edible is
more of a modern delineation. When mycology first started there was little choice but to rely on trial
and error, more or less. For example, it was thought that all slimy mushrooms were poisonous, or that
all red ones were edible. However, that turned out to be arbitrary because not all slimy mushrooms are
poisonous and some red ones are not edible. The key to this is information and memorization, because
in memorizing key details of a species description to be able to identify it in the field, you'd be able to
know characteristics of each mushroom: which is poisonous and which is not. Edible means you can
eat it with little effect while choice means it is a delicacy and should be prepared. In the medieval ages
it was written that during the beauty of spring the devil likes to play tricks and put scary ideas in
humans' head the most and thus, the devil likes the croaking of frogs. Inevitably, the connection is
made with sex. The spring mood commonly recalls feelings of sexual desire or fertility potential. In
Christianity, the frog has no association but with the witch and devil, but it's also tied to children being
born and the end of the psychological stage of growth wherein the physical act of reproducing is not
focused on. Jungian analysis hypothesizes that the frog could be an attempt by nature to form a little
man on an animal level, using the cold-blooded amphibian for it. This is because the tiny hand and feet
resemble man's form. Being cold-blooded, the frog also represents unconscious impulses that become
conscious. Some impulses and ideas can remain inside and some might need to get forced out. The frog
represents the kind that forces its existence upon people. Such notions are mostly indirectly connected
with childbirth yet are still vital aspects of it. The creation of a human being is not the only event
contingent on an impulse, but is one of the main ones. In fairyland lore there are things that give
distinction to the fairy and human realms. The fairy are considered immortal and as a contrast, humans
are said to be mortal. That alone provides enough difference to account for the magic and technology
there. Time is different, as when one steps inside a fairy ring, time dilation occurs. It is said that though
those who enter may only be in there for a day or so, when they exit and return back to Terra,
sometimes hundreds or thousands of years pass [more on direct experience with this later]. This also
means that things such as plants in the spirit world get imbued with special powers, or sometimes
exaggerated traits barely resembling their real world counterparts. For example, it is said Bay leaves
under the pillow at night cause increased vivid dreams, but if done in real life, you can't really attribute
them to that.
The UFO (ufo in Jung) question has always been up in limbo until recently where new understanding
has been elucidated.

Parzival is one of the more “unique” examples of Arthurian literature, and perhaps knightly romances
in general. There are over five versions of it, so beginners may not know where to start, or how. It isn't
always someone's first King Arthur story, and Arthur himself hardly appears in it. The original is a
poem in French by Chretien de Troyes called the Grail Romance, but was translated by German bard
Wolfram von Eschenbach. The Chretien de Troyes version is based on a Welsh romance from the
Mabinogion, titled Peredur Son of Efrawg (Efrawg is York), although they are entirely different and
depict a separate set of characters in an original story. However, the story and moral lessons of the latter
“Parzival” tales borrowed from the Peredur tradition, hence, the connection is not just in name through
the similarities. People often wonder what the name “Percival” means. In the Mustard translation of
Wolfram von Eschenbach's Parzival, it's stated that the name refers to perce a val, which translates to
“pierce the veil,” or “pierce through the middle,” while Richard Wagner's Parsifal, from July 28th,
1885, relies on a non-French derivation, opting for the meaning “pure fool,” in reference to the hero's
quest and traits of his own character that define the knighthood the story references. In Wolfram's
version the Fisher King's palace is given a highly psychedelic depiction with images of a city appearing
and vanishing overnight with no trace, akin to the mushroom or DMT experience. The hallucinations
from the symptoms of mushroom ingestion can effectively be diagnosed as epilepsy while the DMT
model predicts schizophrenia in patients. It in fact used to be thought that elevated amounts of DMT
cause schizophrenia, but that's now known to be an incomplete model with not enough factual data
available as reference. At length it would appear that there was some psychedelic drug references in the
particular Grail Romance of Parzival, but that the Holy Grail itself, when taken to be a psychedelic, or
entheogenic device, can be said to encompass the myth and make it ever present throughout all
Arthurian epics in the King Arthur literature collection, however. This might be a pattern that's ever
present throughout books and literature from all times, that readers may notice if they read enough.
The style in which the stories are based on one another, or that they expand on earlier counterparts is
through the following idea of translations. As is known the Chretien de Troyes version is based on the
Welsh Peredur from the Mabinogion, and while unfinished, was translated into German by Wolfram
von Eschenbach. If readers wants the full story, they can turn to the later editions, but those wishing for
a true depiction usually start at the beginning, to see how the tale really took shape. As such, naming
can be important, to memorize, only insofar as being able to match it to the tale it originated from.
Chretien de Troyes authored Yvain, Erec et Enide, Cliges, and Lancelot, Knight of the Cart, before
concluding with the Quest for the Grail, which features Perceval. It is likely that he went with names
from his own French tradition, as in English Yvain is sometimes rendered Ywain, or in the case of
Peredur, Owain. There should be no confusion with the other Knight of the Round Table, Gawain,
Arthur's nephew, despite the similarities of their name. In the original Welsh romance his name is
Gwalchmei, although can later be found as Gawan in Parzival or Gawain such as when he battles the
Green Knight and marries the Dame Ragnell in stories from the 14th and 15th centuries that also have
connections to Geoffrey Chaucer's Canterbury Tales (Chaucer is unrelated to Geoffrey of Monmouth)
from around the same time. As archetypes, it was at first unclear whether these were the same
characters, and interchangeable, or each respective nation's knightly figure. In other words, Chretien
wanted to explore the legend more, and Wolfram went more into the backstory of things previously
glossed over. They had to use names familiar to their own language, which is why they are different in
most appearances by the various translators. It might not be clear to most readers why the name
Parzival, which is read to be Perceval with a foreign tongue, represents a piercing through a veil. While
this can resemble the jousting activities in which many a lance get splintered via thrusts and broken,
then split, it also references breaking through on a psychedelic drug, so that one gets the full
experience. Usually, this is an aspect of the DMT experience, but one can also break through and get
the full experience from mushrooms or other entheogenic substances such as LSD. That again is only
relevant insofar as the vaguely psychedelic inspired scene of the disappearing Grail Castle, and some of
the other Magic Castles throughout the romance as well, such as, in particular, the Castle of
Maidens/Castle of Wonder, which are said to be enchanted. Through this connection we can begin to
see what is meant by the quest for the Holy Grail, which when depicted, audiences usually see knights
searching for the cup, understanding it will either help him live long or revive him. In reality, it's more
metaphorical and syntax based. Chretein first wrote the Grail Romance in a particular way before
Wolfram translated it into his poem, but Wolfram's poem later saw a translation into English prose,
known as the Mustard translation, although an English translation of the original poem still exists as
well. Readers can try a variety of methods at reading it, to all at once, to one at a time, as their time and
schedule allows. Note, that some read the works in school, so whatever their schooling style is, will
focus on one to two or three different books at once during a period of a few months, on average.
Sometimes research can take years, and not everyone knows what they are talking about or reading just
because they said they did read something, as if they accomplished some feat. The interpretation I have
is exclusive, in particular to my own experience, and so what others say either disagrees with an aspect
of it or agrees and can make sense of it. If they didn't do the work, they're in no different boat than
anyone else in terms of fandom and interest; only those who have written the essays, not necessarily
those who have just talked the conversations, can say they've done the research. The only weakness
there is that it gives someone else the potential to say or write what you did not focus on, even though
you may have acknowledged it. That can create the illusion of false value, where what someone else
produces appears of more value simply because it was on a different topic than yours. Sometimes, it
can be more advantageous to respond rather than present a topic first.
To bring some of Parzival into modern terms, I paraphrased his demeanor as “socially awkward,”
something common a few years ago but has since come under scrutiny in this world of changing trends.
Although there is inevitable comparison between the spear and male genitalia for sexual innuendo, that
isn't the point and is mostly kept to a minimum, besides in connections to male and female romance, or
courtship. However, this isn't exactly accurate, and all that is stated within the book is that he grew up
fatherless so that his mother couldn't teach him the proper knightly conduct, which, apparently, affected
his upbringing, although in Chretien's original romance it's made explicit his mother taught him of
angels and Christ. Even though he became a knight eventually, it was a late start, despite the successes
he had in combat in spite of it. In fact, the main reason Perceval's mother (Herzeloyde in Wolfram)
didn't want him to learn about knights is because his brothers and father perished to knighthood itself.
In any case Peredur is one of the first Arthurian romances, even with its Norman-French connections
through influence, although it came later in the timeline, not being one of the earliest Welsh stories.
That title belongs to the Dream of Rhonabwy, although Culhwch and Olwen is one of the earliest
appearances by Arthur himself. It is also known that besides the foundational stories, and poems, the
Arthurian romances hardly focus on Arthur, and instead he becomes a background figure while the
stories detail the knights' adventures, such as is depicted in Gawain and the Green Knight, Erec, and
Parzival. Most people know the Excalibur legend from English literature to be the United Kingdom
version of the Roland and Durandal legend. Roland then becomes Orlando of the French nationality
and Durandal blade origin.
Names here become important as an a priori device even though sometimes they are arbitrary or
without meaning besides a posteriori derivations. For example, in Romeo and Juliet, which is unrelated
to Medieval Arthurian romances, from the early 16th century, Benvolio is Romeo and Mercutio's friend
and his name comes from the word 'benevolent,' or 'benevolence,' which means good, and the opposite
of bad behavior. Specifically, it means kind or sympathetic, and the definition matches the character's
description and actions in the scenes he's in. Tybalt isn’t introduced in Brooke’s original poem until the
scene wherein he’s slain by Romeo. In Shakespeare, he’s introduced immediately and is seen as the
embodiment of anger and aggression. When Tybalt appears (Tybaldo in Brooke’s Romeo and Julietta),
he fights Benvolio (etym. “benevolent/benevolence”). That occurs while Romeo is still grieving over
Rosaline. However, this is significant because as the story develops, Romeo must enter the fray like
Tybalt did. When Mercutio dies, it forces Romeo to obligate revenge. This is the honor code he accepts,
that he avoided during his melancholy over his original break up. Although Tybalt doesn’t kill anyone
in his first scene, there’s some motivation for the brawl. Tybalt and that theme being a foil to the lover
aspect of Romeo, his death connects the public drama of the earlier scenes with the private drama of
Romeo and Juliet’s own relations. A similar name from King Arthur history is Baldulf, one of his first
major antagonists featured in Brut.
As English is the world's standard language, the common misconception is that they were the first to do
it. As an American, we know we came from the UK after the American Revolutionary War started at
the Boston Tea Party. But, we also know that stories from Wales are some of the earliest that were told
in the oral tradition before being written down and having detail changed drastically. Poems from the
Hanes Taliesin are also the earliest works with reference to Arthurian literature from the 12th century.
However, we know that the English tradition is also based on the French one, meaning that the French
tales of Charlemagne's knights (including Orlando, or Roland) are reminiscent of early King Arthur
epics. This is related to the question of whether Arthur ever existed or not, and whether he was French,
English, or Saxon. If he was a short lived military leader as is commonly hypothesized, a la Saint
George, then his legend has been recorded and blown out of proportion for entertainment and moral
lesson, as was the original tradition with the oral storytelling. Especially with the Welsh tales, much
detail was changed and rearranged when they were recorded for reading.
In Wolfram's Parzival, he goes into detail about his father's wives. Parzival's father was Gahmuret, the
Angevin, son of Gandin, King of Anjou. Upon the King's death, the land was inherited to the oldest
son, who was Gahmuret's brother. However, he was still given a fiefdom. Longing for knightly
adventures still, he set off on campaigns with the attitude that they were just everyday adventures.
While Peredur is vague on geography, Wolfram's Parzival goes into more backstory and detail, while
the original Chretien poem focuses on Perceval and his adventure. Gahmuret parts for Baghdad, and
after the war there ends, he goes to Spain for another adventure. This is when his sons are born, as he
mates with Queens while on both continents. This is why his first son and Parzival's brother Feirefiz is
black and white, literally, with patched skin like a magpie. While Belacane's race isn't explicit, she is a
moor, and it is implied either moorish from Iraq or India, or moorish of the African nation, as what
Americans call black. Parzival's mother is Herzeloyde, from Gahmuret's second war. The brothers grow
up separately and away from their father. However, they are rekindled at the end and become peaceful,
with each man having rule over his own kingdom. Most unfamiliar with the totality of Arthurian
literature are probably unaware of the heavy Christ and religious overtones that can be found in them,
but readers should remember that they are an allegory for the reconstruction of the truth.
I originally wanted this work to be a narrative with a distant tone. However, due to events that
happened in my own life during the construction of this book and the previous documents that lead up
to it, it seems more necessary to add personal detail. I don't play favorites but having a personal
favorite thing can be dangerous because of the potential bias in all parties. The reason I chose to
emphasize Parzival over other epics like Erec is because, while similar in pattern and the stereotypical
knightly quest for the dame, it lacked the supernatural, somewhat psychedelic scene that Wolfram's
Parzival had. However, it's more different from Chretien's original poem than one might suppose, as it
isn't a straight translation, and more like an expansion.
Erec by Hartmann von Aue is the first Arthurian epic in German, as it's based on the French poem Erec
et Enide by Chretien de Troyes. When Wolfram the Bard translated the Grail Romance into his
Parzival, he didn't just translate it, but it seemed more so like he wanted to hide the original tale and its
message. However, when Erec was translated into German it introduced into Germany the Arthurian
epic, which was popular for over three hundred years afterwards, from the late 12th century (1190) to
the late 14th century (1390-1400). Under this lens the rush to publish Parzival made it have little to do
with the original in terms of lessons and instead, Wolfram started to do his own thing with it, that is,
construct an epic quest that featured a “socially awkward” knight as the protagonist. For contrast,
Gawain also plays a long part in this book, as he takes over the narrative while Parzival is on his
adventure. While it may seem as if the Germans originated the Arthurian romance, as their works were
translated into English, the origins are actually in the French chivalric romances about Roland and
Durandal. Arthur is an archetype of them, technically, since they were earlier. It's entirely plausible that
Arthur is the Britains' version of the national hero and that Orlando, or Roland is the French creation of
the archetypal tale. The death of King Arthur is mostly symbolic, and doesn't translate to actual death in
real life counterparts. While on that same note, that Parzival, or in some versions Galahad, finds the
Grail, suggests that his own identity is important when appraising King Arthur himself. Besides Le
Morte D'Arthur, Parzival is the Arthurian romance mainly about the Grail Quest. That means it's about
the importance certain personalities make to complete a whole.

Graham Hancock wrote about Parzival at length in The Sign and The Seal from 1992, a book about the
Grail's connection to the lost Ark of the Covenant. I read Parzival before The Sign and The Seal and so
will similarly reference it throughout this work as a source text on the subject.
Graham Hancock is a historian and archaeologist not in the mainstream domain. His ideas aren't taken
with earnestness in mainstream science or academia. The areas he writes about is mostly egyptology
and debates the true age of the pyramids and Sphinx. The dates are important so as to paint an accurate
picture of history and events that happened concerning things so far unproven. In Fingerprints of the
Gods he claims the stars of Orion's Belt match up with the three Great Pyramids, implying an encoded
message that hasn't been agreed upon that it's been deciphered. Until recently it's because it was too
hard to prove, but with enough language experience and knowledge of history, decoding it can become
more clear. There is also some indication that throughout history, such key information has been hidden
from the masses. When writing first came out, peasants weren't allowed access to it, and it was only
taught to religious monks of the time so they could learn Bible references. As such, there's no real
reason why the knowledge or messages they wanted to pass down should have been accessible to
everyone, in a universal language, nonetheless, especially if they had wanted to wait until a right time
to unveil the game that it was. That is the problem I have with critics of such viewpoints, as some think
they should just somehow know everything instantly. Such cryptic decipherings as intellectual exercise
has roots in geology, geography, and similar earth sciences dealing with weathering and natural
patterns, astronomy included as well. The sequel, Magicians of the Gods, details the Younger Dryas
impact and how it is implicated in removing Atlantis from the globe, or at least some possible tribes
and information that could have been missing from history, in a somewhat startling conclusion. His
first book was on the HIV epidemic in Ethiopia, garnering him the experience and connections
necessary to complete The Sign and The Seal. There are a number of claims he makes in that book, one
of which is that in the early 12th century, Gothic architecture appeared suddenly in France. This is in
connection to the history of the Grail Romance he also writes about. When Solomon's Temple, the
second one, was destroyed by Babylonians in 589 BC, the location of the Ark was also torn down,
which was at the Dome of the Rock at Mount Moriah. However, around the same time Gothic
architecture appeared, the Pope granted the Templars the ability to construct their own churches, which
gave them an enormous amount of power.
In any case the patterns and knowledge found throughout not only Arthurian literature, but fairy tales
and some of our oldest stories in general means that the people back then were not only as smart as we
despite the lack of similar technology, but that they were privy to time and how nothing is really new,
and had already been known for thousands of years.
The Holy Grail up until recently has always remained a relative mystery, although I have elucidated
ultimately what it is by embarking on a quest for it, and finding it. Obtaining it is partly of relative
measure, but still is an objective event with subjective, felt experience as well. The Knightly epics were
originally oral stories told for entertainment, such as that around a campfire, and that any religious or
Christian symbolism is firmly for the purpose of order and a sense of continuity through them, as a
frame of reference. I have tried to bond with others over these tales as much as any other form of
media, let alone entertainment, but it works as well as said replacements. Bonding can require
familiarity. The same is true when introducing potential new material to others for discussion.
However, some topics are largely in the realm of academia, and not always accessible to the common
reader or audience member, and so communication is done through papers and learned texts. However,
one way for events to get recorded is “through the wind,” or concepts such as the Glass Bead Game, a
favorite of Timothy Leary, as written of by Herman Hesse in Magister Ludi (or The Glass Bead Game).
Such concepts, as with Sheldrake's morphic resonance, record events as meme like scenarios through
time, causing stable definitions to occur for one's use or guidance when making a move. The aspect of
guidance is also seen with the I Ching, which rules over prediction and changing of time to record and
present patterns.
All throughout the Grail myth involving Parzival belief is contrasted between the characters through
their motivation. Perceval himself is partly motivated by his mother and what she taught him, and in
the beginning when he prays in front of the knights, the leader thinks he threw himself on the ground in
fear instead. However, that's just as misunderstood as what happened to Parzival. Through this scene
it's suggested that people of all sorts are in unique positions and may have trouble considering things
outside of the box or to not be so influenced by upbringing or belief, especially when on the job.
MemeTrope Book
The Book of Memes and Tropes: A Guide and Discovery Index
(There should be no Marvel references in the book of fairy memes)
Intro:
What I originally conceived as an exploration, or a thesis, on the fairy folklore and nature turned into
an overall history on creation itself, including our myths of giants, dragons, and other fantasy beings as
well. This was mostly done to accommodate a wider audience with a single work. Through the fractal
understanding of life and the universe one can see our origins and essence in these myths as various
symbols and metaphorical connections. Usually, it's linguistically done so as to encompass the syntax
of one's being. In other words, for example, using traditional models of physics and reality, most would
say fairies and fairy tales don't exist, let alone giants. However, through certain cultural understandings,
we are the giants, since fairies are invisible. But, according to the fairy faith, its kingdom may be
accessed under certain circumstances. This doesn't mean that giants stepping into a fairy ring is always
any other thing, but it is analogous to a human stepping inside one in any case. Fairy is described as
anything not here in this reality. As is known visiting the fairy or getting taken by them is not always
pleasant, and appears an ordeal in most instances.
The beard is a quasi symbol for responsibility. It resembles subconscious, and unconscious, growth
from the mouth, which is one reason why “women are attracted to men with beards,” because of the
illusion of increased responsibility. The ability to generate words from it is arbitrary and doesn't matter
as much as the ability to initiate events into motion for comfort. Sleeping Beauty is the fairytale about
an ideal male courtship, but Snow White and Rose Red is the fairytale about the dwarf and the bear,
with elements of the mother/wicked grandmother archetype, as seen in Briar Rose; Rose Red being
Snow White's lesser known, yet extroverted sister. Both are well mannered but occasionally take risks
such as playing too long, going into the woods, and sleeping near a pit they would have fallen into, in
the dark of night, had they went near any closer. However, it is said an angel watched over them so that
they were well off there, and protected in some way.

One reason for reading literature as an introduction into comic books was to appreciate the art forms a
little bit more. It had not much to do with reading certain things in a particular order. Memory was also
important and major literary events are not easily forgotten, yet are rather talked about in pop culture
and history for years. One could have realistically started in any order. In my day growing up, the
delineation was clear. It used to be that people had favorite superheroes although in the back of your
mind would be lingering thoughts about liking everyone, or all the characters, which would entail being
familiar with all the stories. You'd have to read all the series'. Every kid that like Spider-Man also liked
X-Men, chances were, as well as DC properties such as Superman or Batman, ultimately. For show you
could show your maximum appreciation for whichever brand. If you wanted to look cool you'd say
Marvel was better than DC. The crossover events were a testament to that, as every child wanted to be
familiar with all the characters appearing in the pages. It was a simple enough concept to grasp. There
came a point in that boy's thoughts, me, that not just being familiar with the comics and cartoons but all
literature including the maths, sciences, and philosophies would probably be a good idea. It was a goal,
something that seemingly couldn't happen overnight. Being realistic was the first concern. Why not just
read everything at once? The most annoying part was deciding what to read first, or what
simultaneously, once having gotten started it became less a problem and more natural. You adjusted to
it either way. I felt fortunate enough to have been introduced to the lore at a young age. People will
always say reading comics are “easier” than books. In some ways that may be true, but there are
different ways of reading, or at least understanding, a work. It's beside the point and not always a valid
piece of criticism. As I've said and established, we, meaning my family members and I, were
introduced to Marvel Comics and DC as small children. It was only after that I felt ready to move on to
literature and reading books as well as non-fiction. However, I'd read comics as well, usually
prioritizing books and schoolwork first. Later down the line I'd catch up on reading comics by focusing
my time on that rather than books. Thus, I really read most Spider-Man and Marvel comics growing up
before stopping to read books including Sherlock Holmes. It wasn't the first work I read, but in wanting
to become acquainted with Shakespeare, I got addicted for more. Sherlock Holmes it was apparently
evident enough upon first reading it the best example of literature to be seen. I can still give it pros and
cons, however. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle was a great writer and obviously had a notable style. He wrote
well. It used to be said that what media you've absorbed and to a lesser extent what experience you
have will heavily influence your psychedelic DMT trips. That idea was only mostly pushed out of spite
to spread propaganda against those who read a lot of books and didn't care for comics or graphic
novels, thinking they were for children or lacking in moral. In fact, the entire situation started to seem
more and more like a set up for that. People thought they were more clever than they really were,
thinking they had any original ideas that could be executed flawlessly. Most people didn't “do the
homework” and jumped straight into their project. This was inevitable because of due dates. Idealism
couldn't always be reconciled with the practicalities of the situation. The fun got taken out of it pretty
fast and it became a serious thing, or no real laughing matter. Reading Sherlock Holmes before Spider-
Man was a good idea insofar as the latter being influenced by the former. However, of course, if it is
your first time, you quickly find out that can't be maintained unless you specifically read just only
Spider-Man, because you have to seemingly read them all anyway, and picking favorites became
something more appropriate in other contexts. Someone will say they read the Spider-Man comics
(1962) before Sherlock Holmes (1887). Then they will say what and how they learned it doesn't matter
because it's worrying too much about details – they'll try to use a “big picture” argument to not talk
about it plus assert no one cares about the details, meaning, they're really not in the mood for the
discussion. I argue that getting caught up on your literature before reading too many of the comics, in
chronological order nonetheless, is the best and most fun route to take. I read some comics when I was
a kid, and manga too. However, at some point in time I mostly stopped to focus on literature, catch up,
and have the proper context to optimally enjoy the comics and art, and not just stare at the pictures.
It then became an idea in the public, once word leaked and got out, mind you, that someone who had
read more comic books, and thus had more art in their head, would have more “beautiful” or insane
looking and colorful DMT trips, or just psychedelic experiences in general (from either mushrooms or
LSD). However, this isn't really true, and is more so propaganda. The anti-thesis would be that
someone who had read mostly words in literature and let images form in their own head instead of
having art provided for them by artists, would have DMT psychedelia in some other category on
another level. It's more or less clear whether someone had a true devotion to the art or not. It might not
make a difference. Irrespective of any reasons one might have for wishing to spread that idea, DMT is
simply “beyond” all, and nothing “earthly” could so much influence it in that way. Earthly takes on
more than one connotation here. It could mean physical efforts or abstract concepts resulting from the
physical, matter plane. Thus, it is also simultaneously argued that one who hadn't read many comics but
had more literature in their head had the most beautiful psychedelic trips. What would they supposedly
“deserve” for the culmination of that all? After some point people also started talking about
mathematicians and computer programmers (software engineers) as if the text they are exposed to all
day is somehow more valuable than anything else.

Cain and Abel were the original sons of man, or Adam and Eve, from the Garden.

It's better when things come together from apart and not being connected, through coincidence, rather
than through deliberate relations through books read.
In essence, and in a sense, things just kept getting older, or the source material became important, in
which people wanted to look at it. So, there became a lot of “this came from this” or “that came from
that”, or “this came from that” (or, “that came from this”; etc). It only became important a thing in the
public sphere after a certain point. Put it like this: I was born in the 90's. I grew up during the 2000's
and saw the world change, or what have you, if you had been paying attention to any differences. This
was usually seeing technology improve or the graphics in video games getting better. The CGI used in
films and videos whether completely animated or not, was always a step ahead of games, seeing as how
less processing power would be used for them, as there is no need for controls or to program any need
for pressing buttons or inputs into a movie, unless it is an interactive ride of some sort, similar to kinds
you might find at theme parks, to cut it short, such features aren't really practical in the home or in a
home theater system/set up, where the most sophisticated kind of thing you would find is something
like a surround sound set up. Hooking up disc players and monitors through electrical sockets isn't
difficult, if you know what you have and have the spare time to set it up.
One of the riskier parts of this project is the parts involving any re-reading, as the reader generally
notices new things not as apparent or clear the first times. This could drastically alter interpretations if
not jotted down prior, and dramatically change the course a work takes during certain parts. It mainly
calls into question, as if it weren't already known, the value or purpose of knowledge. Most of it was to
be in the form of information bytes. Knowing things were important for the workplace and being in
control of one's duty. People could read about things, for entertainment, which accumulates information
or “knowledge” in their mind, usually considered to reside in their brain in their head, in other words,
the “brain-mind complex”.
It would just be to talk about it, or use it to one's own advantage during decision making processes or
events. People would be able to think about while going about their daily activities performing their
everyday things. So it became a concern of what people could talk about, what they may wish to
remain “quiet” about or exercise a right not to speak to this or that person, and turned into problem
solving, so that a girl's potential mate would be able diagnose a thing on the spot – in a sense, it was
about avoiding looking foolish or humiliating yourself in public. Then again, the spiritualists, mostly
the Buddhists, would say to embrace humility, as one of the only ways of attaining spiritual direction
towards the path.
As such, there became two versions of me, almost, you could say. Who people thought I was and what
they attached onto me with their own volition, and who I actually was, as well as what my actual
motivations are and were.
In some ways it's a question of where to start.
People don't get that the stories are told archetypically, as well as fractally. It wasn't so much an effort
to explain anything, although understanding was a goal. It was then a labor of love, something someone
didn't have to do necessarily, a creative expression.
People started with the social offer of not copying me or the will to develop the idea since it would be
done in bad taste. However, after a long enough time passed, they felt less guilty doing so, blaming that
on what they could call my lack of sufficient output, which would be in their best interest to call. They
therein saw the opportunity to become an expert so as to pretend to be an authority on what they
thought was cool. An increased amount of population is also responsible for the attempts at devaluing
the current system and any bloodlines.

Skies – Dome of Light


Marvel Comics – It once did that “prediction” thing wherein it read when I would have a game on,
playing it while reading during the computer controlled parts, with a character in a panel facing left
looking in the direction of it. It was more so relevant because the text referenced aspects found in the
game, specifically, ones characteristic to the character depicted on the screen at the time.
It was one of those coincidences, which started to get so numerous I wouldn't write every single one
down.

Sherlock Holmes – Sherlock Holmes as a memetic device was intended as an attractive interest from
the standpoint of having read and been exposed to comic book media as an American child growing up.
You didn't so much have literature, English or otherwise, shoved in your face besides at school or at the
recommendation of parents or guardians, and more so something to be done on one's freetime.
In fact, it mostly turned into a woman's insecurity in her mate's abilities to do anything.
I started this work as research into The Illuminati, before anyone else expressed any interest in it, so
among my peer groups, I was the first and original person to begin an inquiry, personal nonetheless,
into it. Superseding this fact is the fact I felt personally bothered by it, or a presence, that I or we
eventually started referring to as Illuminati, and in the traditional sense of, say, a mysterious
organization or a company that when henchmen fail, kills them, instead of giving second chances. My
initial interests were things like Sherlock Holmes. I wanted to be a detective when I was younger and
so looking into it was of interest, that in part was done by absorbing different sources of the history of
the job. I thought my interests meshed nicely with the whole direction. As such, and, almost “naturally”
given my aforementioned background growing up, and in this case, specifically, of Sherlock Holmes,
went a bit hand in hand with the topics of Freemasonry and the Illuminati, so my way easing into the
the histories was less of a burden. It went hand in hand.
The basic story of the Illuminati goes like this, bearing in mind that it “used to be mysterious.”
Nowadays, mostly because of Google, people always feel like they know everything anyway, and don't
like being lectured by people they don't necessarily look up to. As such, this is only a brief summary.
Criminal organizations in cartoons and films as well as other fictional media have displayed that
characteristic, from eliminating henchmen who fail a task to assassinating figures in the way of global,
or local, politics. One example is SMERSH, later SPECTRE, from 007 but it might not really be a front
of the Illuminati, and more so be creative fiction at least somewhat partly influenced by real life
phenomena. SMERSH was a real military organization in the USSR, the country Russia known for
having been involved in more than one war with the United States (USA). It was created by Joseph
Stalin and its name means “Death to Spies,” being a combination of the Russian words “smert” and
“shpionam”.
In real life the Illuminati is said to be of Bavarian origin, but that's merely a starting point. Most people
know that the word illuminati means the illuminated ones, with connections to the concept of
enlightenment. The Buddhist concepts of nirvana and enlightenment have been mysterious, and not
many leaders throughout history can be said for sure to have attained any of those special states. There
is also no reason to believe you or anyone you know could have gotten close to any of those people, or
members of the actual Illuminati itself. In John Robison's book he reports on the concept of “sta bene”,
which is Italian for “be well.” It was a secret dismissal between them when a prospective member
wouldn't perform well enough and would be denied, it's said he would get a sta bene as a notification
for that. This is seen as negative, in that their progress would cease, meaning they wouldn't advance in
rank and lose related benefits. However, they would still publicly know other members of freemasonry
lodges and reading societies because it would have to be played off so as not to be apparent that they
lost the opportunity.
Such patterns of secrecy and controlled information have their history in the early days of astronomy
from the sixteenth century. The first models of the solar system were Aristotlian in nature, meaning
they were Earth-centric, from the 4th century B.C. Ptolemy's model from A.D. 140 was also similar in
that it included Geocentrism as well as epicycles, which were the first way of explaining observed
retrograde motion.

In short, the entire scenario was a smear campaign of sorts to relegate my situation to a lower position.
I became known as a literature lover, particularly English. People may have asked “Why do you like to
read (so much)?” and my response is, well, “I have my reasons.” Thus when word leaked and they
found out about my DMT hobby as well as psychedelic research and interests, combined with that of
literature, I was accused of having been living under a rock for however long according to them. Most
of them didn't know me at all, so their estimates were that for all my life or perhaps the previous five or
so years, I had been living under a rock. However, that isn't true.

Parzival is a King Arthur knightly romance. It's easy to see how extensive dialogue on money, riches,
or how much jewelry you have and what they're worth can be unappealing. It will usually be seen as
shallow and lacking any depth, metaphorical meaning, or satire and irony, an idea paralleled with
modern day rap/hip-hop lyrics in songs on the main radio. However, if any text is examined more
closely it is revealed that there could be nothing else, and that the representation is not only appropriate
or relevant to what was going on but as symbols they are apt, and people can still find complex
meaning in it and the descriptions of them. As such, it doesn't always have to be viewed literally. It isn't
always about the money that they're gloating about. It then becomes defined as a device, perhaps
poetic, that allows these poems and works to be viewed on an “ironic” level comparing them with
modern rap or pop hits, mainly because of the rhyming. It is one of the few epic tales along Dante's
Inferno.

Instead of “saving the best for last” I'll start right here. While Terence McKenna was perhaps the most
fascinating of the Hippie revivalist movement, particularly of the 90's, he is sometimes seen as a
contemporary of Timothy Leary and Jose Arguelles.

You can contact aliens through psilocybin or DMT use and find “God” through that, although I
wouldn't say it's like any other outlet.

I couldn't post or represent The Silver Sable too much because of her principles, so to speak, especially
as shown in her introduction ie; her first appearance. It could have been due to my particular situation
regarding money in general, and manners, so as to keep up appearances and not come off as “selfish”
or “greedy”, perhaps not unlike a Jew, stereotypically – not to force a race joke in there.
Adam Warlock had a dark half, known as the Magus, Latin for wise one.

At some point there was a shirt I was interested in getting. Getting in this instance means buying and
obtaining. It was online. I prefer to purchase items in-store, usually, and with cash. I didn't particularly
want to buy it online, using digital currency, or card. That, plus it was unusually pricey for a tee. It was
over $30 for a simple one off t-shirt. Nonetheless I did it in the most expedient way possible, mostly
out of laziness. I lost a few essential shirts when I moved and needed to replace at least one. Plus, some
had holes in them so in addition to sewing what I could, I replaced a few of the worse torn ones so as to
have the same amount of wearable tees. It took longer than usual to arrive. However, it did, and I just
placed it on the counter. That night I was going to make meat for dinner. I took the frozen red meat out
the freezer and set it on the counter to thaw. The process is one most people are familiar with.
Sometimes as it softens the blood leaks out leaving a mess. Usually, as mom or any parent/guardian
would have demonstrated in most households, you'd set paper towels around it or just clean up any
mess. I forgot about it, and when I woke up in the morning the blood spilled over the counter, however,
it sunk in where the counter was dented in, so the blood completely missed the shirt. It was short of a
miracle. The fact that I purchased it the day I did wherein it felt necessary to do so, having delayed for
months, must have attested to something: I wouldn't have witnessed this event otherwise. If I bought it
the first day I saw it a few months prior, it being October and having first seen the shirt in stores three
months before in July, that wouldn't have happened like that.

I figured out what electricity was. Since earlier I had reported that life was about “breathing air”, an
anti-thesis of sorts. It was extra energy to be fulfilled in case of the “certain air” not being breathed. It
was because of how much implication became involved in life on many levels. It was based on science.
As a consequence of a situation, it had to be delivered or said in that way only for certain reasons. As
far as the breathing air part, it was a determination of “lie” or “truth”. It was based on a “primal nature”
or wasteland scenario.

It became about necessity and the idea of “improving” a concept in case something were missing, so as
it toy with the concept it's better, new, or more novel in some ways. To him it was annoying because he
saw the dishonesty in it.

I came across a signed copy, paperback, priced at $5, of The Origins of Consciousness in the
Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind at the booksource where I usually found good deals. Books were
typically $1-$2, although there was a special section where they may be priced up to ten or twenty
dollars or more. I had previously read the book as a Kindle edition, which was somewhat of a chore.
Being the long tome that it is, it was a strain on my device's battery and I just wanted to read a physical
copy. When I came across that print edition it never really seemed like I had five dollars to spare, being
the broke student I was at the time. Thus, I passed a few times and eventually never saw it again.
However, most of the book stuck with me, and as I have the Kindle edition still on reserve, it still
works as a great reference. It is a non-fiction, historical account of important speculation. I don't have a
physical copy and still must rely on a Kindle edition, so technically what I quote from it here may be
slightly different had I been using a paperback/hardcover copy.

In one issue of his adventures he fought demons and devil characters in the form of people he knew, or
who knew of him. He was nearly forced to do this. On another occasion he was gifted hair oils and
used too much which made it lock up. They turned into braids. He had to cut them.
To start with, there were a number of problems, and water fluoridation was not getting much attention.
No one really owed anyone any favors, unless they got themselves into debt and had to pay up or work
something off. Things were kind of set into motion in the beginning and people were fulfilling their
duty. Jobs sometimes clashed. People were, sometimes, just doing their job.

Here, I will start my thoughts on the Illuminati thing.


Some good books on the Illuminati in general are any book on the subject, plus any book on
Freemasonry, and Robert Anton Wilson and Robert Shea's Illuminatus! trilogy. It is a standard
hypothesis that Freemasonry is tied to Illuminati, plus other shadowy sounding groups like the Jacobins
or Rosicrucians. If you enter Rosicrucians into a search engine the definition will say an occult group
dedicated to studying the mystic arts. Specifically, a Rosicrucian is one from the 17th (and 18th) century
a part of a movement involved with esoteric (and occult) wisdom, with mystical and spiritual
enlightenment emphasized. A Jacobin is a member of a radical chapter during the French Revolution
(1789) who partook in terrorist activities, but today its use usually refers to a member of any extremist
political group. Hearing about it or reading the word in the early-mid 2000's made one consider
political groups, but research dictates that it was a real terror group of destruction in the late 18th
century, that for four years of the French Revolution they played a considerable part and no doubt had
to do with some of the slayings that occurred. The Illuminati was always the stereotypical group who
disposes of henchmen via death when said recruit would fail a mission. However, that was always
merely a motif found in fiction works and nary a trace of the, if any, real organization could be found in
real life, at first. Some obvious places to turn were politics and the entertainment industry if history
were to be an indicator whatsoever. The education system, science, and religion branch out from them
as spheres that get influenced.
In the Illuminatus! Trilogy, the authors mention two books, Proofs of a Conspiracy by John Robison
and Memoirs Illustrating the History of the Jacobins by Abbe Barreul, as being source texts about the
real Illuminati and the story of their connection to Freemasonry and the Knights Templars. Through
reading them, the story becomes more clear, although both books are slightly different. Robison's book
begins at a friend's house, as he notices someon a table and begins flipping through them.

Unfortunately, this originally had been a tale I wanted to tell more impersonally, from the point of view
of a reporter, or journalist, reporting facts and information that I discovered myself. However, this was
uncovered by other people, who forced and raped it out of me via peer pressure and unwanted
provocation. Because of that, the work must take the form it does. My pace should have had little to
nothing to do with other people's leisure. That is what my experience was like and what any delay may
have been due to. As a consequence of sorts, what was first a distant story with an omniscient like
narrator now has some of my personal story, information, and experience spliced between. The original
“book report” like style was reduced so audience's and other people can be appeased by me doing that
so as to answer some questions, some of which may be personal, whilst simultaneously telling the story
I wanted to tell, and meant to, before getting “distracted.” My experience was horrible, and the trauma
made it harder to tell the story by adding extra events to relate. The format was always going to be an
endeavor since I was continually writing it the whole time and it had to end. In some ways from the
start it was never going to be complete, and it was possible to keep adding to it, putting out new
editions, but one had to know when to stop. This wasn't a book contract or an assignment for school,
rather something done on my own free time, out of my own volition, and as a labor of love, inevitably.

Sherlock Holmes is considered one of the most popular literature characters in the history of the written
word. He is certainly one of the best fictional detective to go to for your yarn fix. However, he wasn't
the first, merely the best. He had also always been a somewhat shadowy, mysterious figure. The
tobacco pipe smoking consulting detective made his debut in A Study in Scarlet by Sir Arthur Conan
Doyle, published in 1887 although written in 1885 while he shopped around for buyers of his
manuscript. It's well known that he studied to be a physician and opened his own practice where he
wrote fiction stories in his freetime, although that isn't a reason to justify any criticism you might make
of his writing, in that most people don't know the format of that work. It's composed of 56 short stories
and four novels, sometimes considered novellas for their brevity.
The English language is looked at as the world standard, so most things require it to experience the full
essence of the various activities. Most find reading or writing laborious and may only participate in it
during school, not on their free time, and wouldn't really think about becoming a writer professionally
for a full time job. It can be a labor of love. One of the best ways of improving English or language
skill is to read and write in it. Speaking and listening are also supplementary. I liked books since a
young age, as neat objects of value and always held they might serve some highly sought after use
when I was an adult in pursuit of a career. I never saw myself as a writer, yet more of a journalist, as
fiction writing seemed to take more effort than it was worth for someone like me. I didn't go to school
for it, but saw myself in a flourishing non-fiction career writing about science and reporting on other
events. It never took off.
As a legit, fulltime book collector (hunter), I noticed something after a certain point. Some books that
have long been out of print were enormously difficult to find, that is, they were rarer and more
expensive than average. You couldn't really find them in stores and had to get them online from a
reliable book dealer. Some stores, however, allow the option of ordering a book if you can't find it
there. Even then the systems they use don't always have what you're looking for, and usually not at the
price you want (if money matters).
These books of course are from the 17th century and before. Why were they not simple to acquire? They
can easily be found online to read a transcription of but to find a physical copy of the book to own and
use was more costly. Some of these books were also from the 5th and 6th centuries, in short, I speak of
some of the earliest manuscripts written in the Celtic, Welsh, French, German, and English languages.
The Asian works were different in this regard, although related in a big picture way. It is said the first
literature story is of Japanese origin (Tale of Genji by Murasaki) and influenced Romeo and Juliet. The
fairy tales had strong support until the early 20th century when we started to see a decline of them in
their printed form, and tradition, which came from oral storytelling. Some fairy tales have been adapted
into films or plays on stage, so in some sense, through some medium, almost any medium, the stories
still propagate. However, one must always account for the subtle differences exerted through the
different mediums. To use an example from literature, Sherlock Holmes on the stage or screen, silver or
gold, no matter how well performed or received will never be an experience similar to that of the
written pages. Even though Doyle said he didn't care how, particularly, adapters use the character, that
was just a notion acknowledging the fact that you can't control an audience's reaction. That couldn't be
reconciled with his desire for the audience to read the works and comprehend the messages. If read for
entertainment the reader can simply remember his or her favorite parts and think about them guidance
or ultimately, memorize the whole thing for a big picture integration and ability to summarize a plot
and provide a synopsis. It also seemed like some of the writers for adaptations may have had their own
idea in mind and just wanted to use the property for its popularity or usefulness. In short it started to
seem like a conspiracy where these books, considered to be of value (mainly by me in particular) were
being suppression. Such movements aren't unheard of in history. There are witch burnings (Salem
Witch Trials), slavery, the holocaust, and a few other examples of similar attempts at suppressing
history, information, or truth by wicked men. However, this was just my speculation and maybe the
books were hard to find for some other reason. If I was a millionaire, say, for instance, the difficulty
would be more relative and less a problem. One consideration is that they, like almost all things, require
a special reading to interpret them the way I see them, given the exclusive knowledge and experience I
have. Normal readings of them are fine too, but beware criticism accumulated from neo-readers who
can't help but feel it's so normal to find loads of sarcasm, irony, jokes, hidden meanings, and offense in
every sentence, word, and letter, for the individual reason of cultural strained creativity.
It is safe to say, through no direct connection but cultural patriotism, that Sherlock Holmes' legacy gave
birth to the new generation of characters, and heroes, in literature, such as James Bond (007). The first
hero or gentleman adventurer from English literature after Sherlock Holmes was Bulldog Drummond
(1920), who was an influence in building the James Bond character by Ian Fleming. Many writers may
loathe to admit that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and his creation, the fictional detective, played a major
role in the influencing of their works. When those books were written and published, the age of the
comic book was already well underway, both in USA and UK. As is known, Doyle wrote Sherlock
Holmes stories from 1887-1893 before taking a hiatus from writing about the sleuth, ultimately
returning in 1903 with new adventures, with the final collection being published in 1927. When no new
Doyle Sherlock stories were being written or published, it allowed other adventurers to step into the
spotlight, some of who were quite the contrast from our familiar Holmes, yet were still clearly
influenced by him and in awe of the stories featuring his exploits. Hugh Drummond by contrast is
described as a large man, and ugly, in part from natural looks and on the other hand because of his
exploits, sometimes involving combat or boxing with dangerous men.
Sherlock Holmes is said to be based on the writer Arthur Conan Doyle's teacher Joseph Bell, although
family say he used traits of himself as inspiration for his creation. Nonetheless, that is maintained for
historical property reasons and the case for Joseph Bell having a part in the detective's realization is
strong. Even though Bell likely had an extroverted personality, he was a quiet man. His deduction
technique was used by Holmes the first time he met Watson, but Doyle was also influenced by Poe's
Dupin and Gaboriau's Lecoq. Holmes as a character dislikes the other fictional detectives, and Doyle
likely only turned to Bell for any additional remarkability he could find when constructing his
adventure stories. Besides references for Doyle's Sherlock Holmes stories, the other thing Bell was
known for was his innovation in nursing, something only done for a need for workers. As a surgeon, he
was able to set up a nurse training program at St. Thomas' Hospital, in London. There was an emphasis
in kindness towards the nurses looking for training or a place to stay, as Bell got permission for his idea
in the Summer of 1868. Of course, the nurses were poorly trained before this, being regarded as
servants and poorly paid. While Florence Nightingale is regarded as the creator, or mother, of modern
nursing, thanks in part to a fund from 1860 that revolutionized the nursing system, this was happening
again as she returned from the Crimean War. They would get more pay, for example, and better
training, in a demonstration of how their skills can be applied during the war situation. The ramification
people don't comprehend that had an enormous impact on society was this, and could be seen as an
event that inspired a “cocky” attitude in the women nursing scene that can still be seen today. Joseph
Bell effectively transferred all his knowledge and technique into this nursing effort freely, so that the
females felt entitled to attitudes he experienced himself. The Sherlock Holmes stories Doyle later wrote
can be seen as a response in part to this, including Sherlock's fate of virginity that we know of. This
was done through the Royal Infirmary once Joe had been appointed there, and that Arthur Conan Doyle
and Joe Bell both had war experience on the side of England supports an understanding of this view
more.

There were two ways of interpreting art. The second kind came from a strain in the amount of material
to pull from, so it was given the treatment of being used at least five years after its debut, and in many
cases even longer. In some ways it wasn't an intrinsic property of the information (technically, the
extramation from it) that was being understood out of it, that is, it wasn't always the writer's intent.
Sometimes during a creative synthesis from the mind of the person reading it, as in, their memories and
experience (learning), would be excited by the taking in of the art, and thus produce a conclusion the
person comes to. It isn't always correct. The validity of it can be argued.
“Any persons found trespassing will be assisted in every direction”

the acid hit him and he realized it all. I experienced life as a sperm cell being ejaculated out, but before
that it was different and normal. This experience was similar but also different from previous ones. I
had regretted masturbating and that aspect took a toll on my psychology. I visualized the sperm going
to waste, compounded by my increasing age, which means time is running short to presumably produce
the healthiest semen, thus making a healthy child. It all boiled down to healthy choices. It was easy to
see how masturbation is a sin. The idea rests on accumulated actions leading to spiritual power similar
to karma that deposits itself in the child, for the most part. This isn't the same as genes or DNA getting
passed on to the offspring, per se. This idea takes science further.
Needless to say I started focusing on that, which took control over most of my psychology. It seemed
over, failed, and too late to find a partner to reproduce with. Just the other day I had saw a beautiful
redhead girl but couldn't talk to her. She was fine enough to be my partner but it didn't happen. That
seemed to be my downfall, as I'd never again find someone so wonderful. So I was where I was.
I couldn't jack off anymore because it seemed wasteful and like a plot. The first part was allowing
cannabis to be smoked. It acts as an aphrodisiac, making one horny. This could lead to casual sex or
masturbation, one way or the other, only about a third of the time does that sperm get used for
fertilization. I couldn't handle those thoughts.
I wouldn't make my bed upon awakening and would just throw the covers off. When the acid finally
kicked in, I made my bed, but my body seemed to do it a little against its will, meaning, I seemed out of
it but still there. That could be dangerous to admit in that someone could accuse you of having the
potential to be a dangerous sleepwalker, when that isn't the case. My bed fully made, I was proud and
snapped a photo. The designs on the top blanket stood out with a diamond like, tryptamine glow, newly
noticed, and kind of creepy despite its beauty. My favorite part was before this, when it first kicked in.
Everything turned 3-D like, but I wasn't wearing glasses. The red and green was a slightly more
unnoticeable or secondary effect. The PS4 on the shelf looked like Durandal, as perhaps that may
ultimately be one of the references the designers implemented cleverly. Once my vision split and it all
looked 3-D is when that was really noticeable. I glanced in the mirror and saw the differences. I looked
like a Final Fantasy character, and this all seemed like the opening to the game. I examined how my
vision was different, and everything looked smooth, and, again, 3-D. Things didn't look normal. I
looked at the mirror and myself for some time, delivering a soliloquy and not paying much mind to the
neighbors in the next apartment. I looked so pretty now, and there wasn't a trace of a blemish. I looked
really anime-like and elvish. My teeth were perfect, or I couldn't notice anything wrong. My hair wasn't
bothering me. I marveled at this. Soon enough I walked around, looked in a different mirror, put some
music on, and smoked.
At first I only used one gel tab, when it kicked in, maybe thirty minutes later, I supplemented it with
another. That is when my vision truly “split,” signaling the onset of the so called inebriation.
It was just bizarre. During the main brunt of the experience I had turned into a “dragon of eden”,
secretly trained for time immemorial until this moment, to hunt down enemies and fugitives. My
weapon was the dragon breath that had stardust and crystals incased in it and was capable of
completely disintegrating the demons on the loose. I wasn't expecting this, but once I realized it was
going on I eased into the role naturally, understanding all the puzzle pieces necessary. I couldn't talk or
say much but I knew what side I was on and my place in the game. It was akin to being a chess piece in
the grand design. There was a kind of battle, or war, going on and I had to play my part. This venture
was mediated by trainers and those who knew my purpose. The white or black skin color was only a
minor detail. I could have easily broken out of this pattern but never found the opportunity to ease into
a different role, or game.
On the whole I seemed to have gotten transported to a future centered on farming, and saw visions of a
daisy or wheatfield with a clear sky and sun shining bright. It wasn't too different from a particular
DMT trip I had that took me to a mantis planet after I had entered an animated painting with a farmer
after the curtains had opened. It looked similar, but this experience was acid and there were similarities
and differences between those psychedelic, or hallucinogenic, inebriations. I interpret those data points
to be evidence supporting the prophetic experience and how it operates.
I went outside again to leave for the train station which is something I had been meaning to do for days
but was waiting for the right time and kept getting busy while holding off on different things I had to
get done. There also a few events such as film screenings I was supposed to go to but didn't for similar
reasons, some may call it depression. I waited too long once again then it became dark. I was leaving
anyway again but kept getting distracted by menial tasks and the thought I'd be too late. Near this time
is when I dropped the tabs and they kicked in. I still seemed like I had enough time to go. I'd be seeing
if I could do things like punch in numbers. I had to get dressed and then leave, which I wanted to do
efficiently. This is when it started to feel unlikable because of all the Russian, spy, and nuclear
associations with it. I checked the time and it wasn't too late so I left even though it was dark. However,
some of the hallucinogenic effects started to occur which was worrisome though I tried not to be too
effected and to focus on the plan of commute. It started to seem like the world was going to end, which
was unlikeable, and it became an uncomfortable metaphor. It seemed I was picking up signals that the
world was going to end through subliminal advertising. You had to be intelligent enough to pick it up.
However, it seemed I failed. If I made it to the train it would have taken me to a safe haven,
presumably filled with elfin like creatures. However, I as so worried and thought it might be too late. It
kept seeming like there was something I had to do but I didn't want to go back, for it spelled death.
There was an asteroid crashing into Earth and only the chosen select were heading out on an ark while
the unworthy who weren't paying attention would perish. I was invited but was late, hence why I was
leaving now, at the behest of those already there. I didn't want to sleep that night. I saw the visions of
the asteroid crash but none of us could stop it. That's one of the reasons I stayed behind before leaving,
to assist stopping the impact. On my walk there to the station my back started to feel like it was
overheating, leading to “human torch” sensations.
I thought about the extinction from wasted sperm and not finding a mate fast enough. Then a miracle
occurred to me. What if I were under surveillance and my sewage system was connected to a special
terminal where a team of men collected the extra semen that went down the drain and salvaged what
they could? This was being collected, so I had nothing to worry about. Most of the advanced
technology was a secret from the population for their own good and safety. My sperm was to be sent
off to space on a remote planet far away from the rest of humanity, who exercise bad traits that are too
selfish. Thus, I was being given a chance to start anew with my offspring. Some extra herbs and plant
material I put down the toilet was being collected and sent away with them as well. Some of it was
being held on space stations until they could send it away. This is a process that took thousands of
years. In other words while I was worried at first, this effort soothed me well.
Jack Kerouac was also all over this trip. He had only been a part of a few others. Kerouac was known
for trying to depict the human and psychedelic experience in his literature, but it was too hard, so his
legacy was mostly left incomplete. He wanted to be an audio recording engineer, although there isn't
much available about him on that. It's difficult to describe so they just did something else. Technology
allowed the experiences to be uploaded to a kind of cloud, or cosmic unconscious that is able to be
accessed by secret means.

Deck the halls with red and green. I would like to provide an accurate description of this trap and how
it went down, plus what went into the construction of it – or just it, period. Imagine if that sentence
didn't contain the word construction, it would have been completely different and we would be on a
different track altogether.

The last time I took LSD I was transmitted a number of spacey signals from an informational wave. It
seemed to have beamed into my head from outer space. It was relatively short lasting, as that part of the
acid wave is known to be. It reminded me that I had some leftover work to finish of the same nature. I
had yet to describe this aspect of the intoxication yet. They were brief, colorful, what can only be
described as psychedelic images. It happened at the onset of every LSD dose, besides a microdose.
Sometimes when it would come on, with eyes closed, it could last a relatively long while. However, at
the doses I was taking those days, lower doses for my own safety and psychological well being, they
were a comfortable short duration, as psilocybin is commented to be.
In fact, the previous LSD trip I had prior to that was pretty intense.

The Submariner is a good example of the relative nature of the situation. Created in 1939 by Bill
Everett, he was one of the first cartoon characters, that is, comic book characters created to illustrate a
story in a way different than literature.
I decided that I didn't like new comics that much, despite them being necessary, the main reason why
being the differences between the classics and the newer stuff. Mainly, I liked to think about the art
styles. The modern stuff from the 2000's and onward were mainly inked and penned. The classics were
penciled and colored in newsprint style ink. With Marvel, Stan Lee wrote most of the stories despite the
art being handled by different teams and persons.
The characters in comics represent archetypes and motifs. While not the point, one of the main focuses
of this text is to explore literature and comic books. For example, Spider-Man is implied quite subtly to
be a spy, an aspect later highlighted during his connections with Iron Man and the Civil War storyline.
Even during the 60's with his debut and the pronunciation of his name this can be observed. However,
that is not all a Spider-Man symbol comes to represent. He is a powerful card to draw (or pull). He
represents the young and potent developing male, particularly American from the USA. His adventures
had in most part been done already in more mature manners in Captain America and Iron Man, which
is why they seem to get respect and are Avengers. Peter Parker never really joined the Avengers and
was a lone wolf of sorts. It used to be that one could get by only using Spider-Man comics and fandom
but there are limitations to it in some senses. It isn't something a serious reader could then get away
with for too long. To an American boy Spider-Man and Peter Parker depict one kind of prime or ideal
archetype to be. Not just his intellect that got him by in High School and college (although, it could be
argued that the radioactive spider bite is what facilitated this, as he could have been a completely
different person and lead a completely different life had he not gained super powers. While he did
photojournalism on the side for extra cash not having come from the most upper classes of households,
having been adopted in by his Aunt May and Uncle Ben after the death of his parents, he always
originally had a passion for science and wished to become a professional, employed scientist after
graduation. While some of the foes he faces are common crooks and criminals a number of them are
professors or mad scientists or just normal scientists gone wrong somehow. It being a small world, this
is offset by the large cast of characters in the Marvel (and DC) universes, with some other heroes being
scientists or engineer types such as Mr. Fantastic or in the case of Tony Stark, inventor-capitalist types
or an engineer with a business mindset. Foes like Dr. Octopus or Professor Smythe show this, while the
majority of other Spidey foes are a varied rogues gallery of criminals or opportunists regardless of any
profession. There is also frequent crossover such as the Scorpion appearing in Captain America's
comics as a villain. From X-Men characters like Mr. Sinister, biologist and genetic engineer, and
Apocalypse experimented with genes and DNA. The red and blue garb is also a powerful symbol, first
having been donned by Superman in 1939. The green and purple appears in the 14th century Grail
Romance by Chretien de Troyes, as well as the gold, blue, and silver colors.

The Fantastic Four was the “first” Marvel comic in the 60's from their new company, and they started
off as an adventure team. They are a reflection of the 50's nuclear family unit of a somewhat ideal or
realistic type. The comic is known for introducing a lot of the Marvel villains and characters that
crossed over after in other series' and other character's comic issues, and the team itself is known for
having many run ins with other popular Marvel characters such as Spider-Man. However, they don't
always interact with other teams too much such as the Avengers or X-Men, as all the characters in these
universes don't always know one another personally. Of course, Fantastic Four wasn't really the first
Marvel comic, since it started out as Timely Comics before becoming Marvel Comics and publishing a
number of associated comic books including titles with Golden Age names and previous intellectual
property. Mr. Fantastic wasn't the first rubber type character displaying elasticity of limbs. Their first
such character like that appeared in Mystic Comics 1 and went by the name Flexo the Rubber Robot.
This is not to disregard Luffy from One Piece. Plastic Man of DC first appeared in Police Comics 1,
1940. Indeed, the first superheroes were Superman from Action Comics (1938) and Batman from
Detective Comics (1939), although it is well known Superman was influenced by the novel Gladiator,
featuring a protagonist with superhuman athleticism named Hugo who became a crime fighter. These
earliest, Golden Age comics were more cartoon like and could be seen to have a sense of humor to
them. Compare those to any modern day issues of any series from the 90's or 2000's beyond, not to
mention anime style manga, OVAs, or serialized series' for television. Marvel also created Flat Man for
Avengers West Coast and DC included Rubber Man and Elongated Man during their popular Crisis On
Infinite Earths storyline. The first comic books did not appear in 1940, nor were Marvel or DC the first
to do it despite them being the go to names in that publishing industry today. The UK had a number of
comics or serialized cartoons in print since at least 1900, implying some kind of connection or
continuation between the literature and comic book mediums if not a number of applicable references.
There was literature since, say, the dawn of civilization, taking things back to Babylon and
Mesopotamian days, considering the Bible, or Hebrew and interpretative texts such as Torah
(Pentateuch) and Talmud are considered some of the finest examples of print, written works, and
classical literature in existence. That isn't to say the Bible, Old Testament or New Testament, or the
books and stories within them are considered fiction. Most people will take them literal like a
fundamentalist. However, the lessons or morals from them can be obtained metaphorically. Most of the
tradition we know today come from that direct source. It is some backbone or foundation of literature.
However, the Biblical references in any 60's or 70's Marvel comics may be thin or take considerable
reaching to manifest as one. The elongated limbs can be a reference to the psychedelic movement, or an
aspect of psychedelic drug use, such as a side effect of psilocybin mushrooms, LSD, DMT/ayahuasca,
or peyote cactus. This aspect can be an indicator as to the onset of the psychedelic intoxication. Like it
or not, there appears to be an inherent, intrinsic, inner manifesting property of the general psychedelic
experience that induces wave like behavior over everything. This is mostly unique to mushrooms and
LSD, although the two inebriations can be distinguished. Marijuana is commonly considered a “mild
psychedelic”, when smoked, doses are fairly small. However, when consumed as an edible, it passes
through the gut and gets converted into 11-hydroxy-THC instead, which is more potent and powerful,
easily causing “psychedelic” images and actual visual “hallucinations” or illusions, especially within
the eyelids. A more minor effect of weed is increased color saturation as a qualitative effect, through
mechanisms related to its curing of glaucoma, although the effect only lasts during the approximately
four hour inebriation. As said, the edible form is agreed to have the potential to floor users more. When
compared with LSD and psilocybin mushrooms it is easy to see why all forms of cannabis are
considered mild when it comes to entheogenic and psychedelic effects. A lifestyle of procuring more
psychedelic and hallucinogenically psychoactive substances is just one possible after effect mainly
caused by habit, as the psychedelics have a low rate of addiction. Such lifestyles, particularly among
the youth and those desiring to be hip may be called by some “groovy” and the like, as a movement, so
as to associate it more with values derived from the experience(s). DMT is another experience, as it
replaces your entire visual field with nothing but psychedelia (or, psychedelica, here defined as being
anything to do with a thing induced by the administration of a psychedelic substance). However, LSD
and psilocybin (psilocin) can also do such, albeit, with high enough doses. A typical dose, not one
designed for deep, inner exploration, would be the kind above a microdose that people take to chill or
relax. Larger doses of LSD or psilocybin, which last longer than DMT, although, that doesn't count as
an excuse to designate them as stronger than dimethyltryptamine in and of itself, can also seemingly
take over one's body and induce a vision with eyes closed. When the dose is high enough, there's little
choice and your eyes will shut anyway, so it is recommended for set and setting you are somewhere
safe and to avoid accidents, preferably laying down. This will seem like common sense during the
experience. DMT is different in that it doesn't really allow “leisure” time on the level of acid or
mushroom since it is so short acting. However, all the psychedelic substances have interplay so the
similarities are honestly as unsurprising as the differences, considering that different substances are
being used. What bonds them, for one, is the serotinergic structure underlying all the tryptamines, from
LSD to psilocybin. It is the indole ring, which is a benzene ring fused to a pyrrole ring. DMT,
dimethyltryptamine, is just serotonin (5-hydroxy-tryptamine) without the hydroxyl ion on the 5C atom
and with two methyl groups on the terminating tryptamine Nitrogen. Thus, it is technically serotonin in
freebase, crystal form that can be smoked and ingested as a physical substance. Normally, serotonin
itself is inactive in vivo because it's too polar to pass the blood brain barrier. In this definition serotonin
is a life essence kind of chemical, responsible for many life processes of biological life. When the
ligands active receptors the organism experiences “psychedelic” effects in fashions respective to each
drug, depending on how and where it fits into the brain. The psychedelics work through the same
receptorome although they don't attach to the same specific receptors and not with the same strength as
their unique shape determines all those attributes. For example, LSD is more dopaminergic than
psilocin and while they attach to some of the same receptors, it isn't always with the same strength, and
they'll have unique places of fitting in as well. Thus can substances be qualitatively determined in most
regards. Talk of psychedelics used to be taboo and then hidden or disguised in many ways, for instance,
if there are any allegorical drug use stories in the Bible, they're likely under metaphor and require
special interpretation, whereas similarly with paintings and murals typically found in frescoes and
churches, mushroom and alien like symbolism may find its way in. Angels and images of God can be
interpreted as alien or entity contact as alternative explanations. Typically, as the brain is stimulated by
the activated receptors is when the user experiences psychedelic effects. If successful on a high enough
dose he or she may experience a story told primarily through the visual system, eyes opened or closed.
DMT is considered the most powerful in this aspect, even as its short duration attests. If you add from
somewhere you must subtract elsewhere, and any lessons or experiences from mushrooms or acid can
be grasped through smoked DMT, although there's a steeper learning curve as its method is fast and
chaotic, making it difficult to get anything out of the experience. Users of DMT may be not as
overwhelmed by what happens to them on good doses of psilocybin or LSD despite their longer
duration, although they may be thrilled and excited at the prospect of a longer lasting journey, while not
as overwhelming. However, through that kind of thinking, the unique aspects of LSD and psilocybin
may be highlighted more excessively than usual, while the similarities with DMT are noted. In any
sense, the psychedelics when surveyed tend to cause transcendental beauty to be witnessed.
Unfortunately, this can lead to arguments in the psychedelic scene. It becomes too easy to be skeptical
and thus disbelieve another's experience on a whim.

The exciting part of the game was to compare literature to the comic medium to be able to point out
similarities and differences as well as pros and cons. The popular, mainstream comic brands started
being published around 1938-1939. For comparison, the final Sherlock Holmes book, SH being the
standard for what prized literature should be, was published in 1927. It can be looked at as if comics
replaced reading novels as being the best medium for literature. However, there are still people who
like and prefer to read novels. It is like comparing apples and oranges, however, as the mediums are
used for different messages, while similar, still complement one another. English literature mostly came
from the United Kingdom (UK) from around 400 A.D. in the Medieval period until the Victorian era
ended circa 1930. Some books in the Bible are reported to have been written in 40 or 50 A.D. for
comparison. As such, most popular American novels also started coming out in the nineteen thirties and
a few years prior. The 40's are a special time for American literature. Some of the first printed works
were poetic in nature and utilized rhyme. These include the original King Arthur works and sources.
However, some of them are written in prose rather than verse too. Some retellings are told in verse as
well, such as Tolkien's Gawain and the Green Knight, which when first written by the “anonymous”
Gawain poet in the 13th century, was a rhyming poem. Many of these were also told orally at first and
passed down in that tradition until being written. Copies, even modern editions in book format, are
harder to find than your average tome or book these days, unless you use online copies to read them for
free, usually in PDF format. To add an authentic physical copy of a book to your collection or
bookshelf is more expensive and time consuming, although the benefits of using one should be obvious
and superior over using a computer screen, despite the speed you may be able to obtain the work and
read it. One reason is the strain a screen puts on your eyes from staring at it, while a print book should
feel a little better, however, you would also in most instances be able to copy and paste the text from an
online edition into a page in a word processor should one decide to quote it for a purpose. This isn't to
suggest there could be some conspiratorial reason for the rarities. It's easy to find the more common
King Arthur pieces, for instance, such as Le Morte D'Arthur or Parzival. Some of the King Arthur
manuscripts also came from France, so that it isn't just a matter of Britain, France, and Rome history
nor British literature, since the French counterparts play a significant role.
What would it mean? In these works I seriously propose that I am uncovering new information and
discoveries, or “hidden” things (occult is usually taken to mean hidden), some of which may also be
things people rarely, if never, talk about for one reason or another, typically that they don't know. It isn't
just that I haven't seen people talk about them and want to see more discussion. Some of this is newly
created thought so it's impossible for it to have occurred on this level prior to my unleashing it upon the
masses through my previous written work. For instance, I use historical detective work to determine
myth from reality, or what aspects of reality influenced myth. It gives a new meaning to the phrase “art
imitates life” (or life imitates art). One example is the Bible, which people always say is bullshit. When
I was growing up, people said it was fake. But, I always wondered why some people still had faith.
That discrepancy confused me, because it meant there were different beliefs and that some percentage
of the population could have trouble distinguishing fact from fiction. Such behavior can be used to a
party in power's advantage and one can easily smell the midst of a new holocaust on the horizon
through that. This work takes on similar tones. “Uncertainty” for the most part is a myth that I will
explain like this: some stuff is impossible to “know”. That is what “God” or the metaphor for Him is,
since it is usually described as something mortals can't comprehend. This may disappoint some females
since they want their man to “know everything” or be every bit as capable to the point they might need
eyes on the back of their head or some additional psychic power. To admit not knowing something,
distinguished from “ignorance”, is seen as unfavorable because there will in some mindsets be
“someone who does”. However, there should be limits to that idea, based on the laws of physics. For
instance, any piece of trivia can be relegated to a thing going on behind your back you can't physically
perceive, although you may be able to deduce as much. I don't care about that idea and think it signifies
a kind of wanting, and knowing the impossibilities, or improbabilities, of such nonsense, plus having
been to the psychedelic DMT, psilocybin, and LSD realms myself as well to witness such transcendent
beauty, I feel more comfortable than most in making rhetorical statements or comments to gauge the
mood at all. The newfound attitude in which this occurred is an exact description of brujas and
sorcerers collecting darts in the Amazonian rainforests. It has to do with assumptions that people can
gain more “knowledge” or information that way, and their newfound positions can be used for power,
and to either heal or harm other people. However, those are mostly ego desires.

There was some indication as to why the older, rarer books were in such a state and hard to obtain
besides getting a hold of the online e-text version. There was a strain on creativity. It was reasonable to
assume that all outcomes had already been considered. People trying to be clever would be tempted to
use the ancient books for some part of their plan but it would be a message that they are hard to find in
print or only of interest to specialists. The same conclusions would be found in later works and to read
the original tome would be just to relay what it was about. In that way it was decided that it was worth
saving money and resources, such as trees, paper, and oil, than to reprint all the classic tomes, now
preserved in antiquity through the web. However, as a luxury and a treat for the serious book collector,
they could spend the money in an effort to obtain them, usually at a greater price than average.
On the other hand it became apparent that other people were starting to “use books as weapons” of
some sort, and for some reason. However, that reason was obvious. They were too influenced by a
videogame that had mages use them to cast magic spells. These people in real life who started to use
books for entertainment, and possibly research, after encountering myself, either knew about the game
or not. It was pretty bad in either situation and couldn't get much worse. If they knew about it and were
doing it, it seemed lame, whereas if they were just rampantly trying to use books for nefarious reasons,
something may have been wrong, or going on.

The Amazing Spider-Man myth, as told through the comics and other mediums, has roots prior to its
official origin in Amazing Fantasy 15 (1962). Steve Ditko was the artist for Amazing Adventures,
Amazing Adult Adventures, Amazing Fantasy, and The Amazing Spider-Man up until issue 30, where
he left, and the next artist was John Romita Sr. Stan Lee wrote, and Ditko had his beginnings in the
comics industry prior to that, although it tends to be what he's most known for. A common
misconception is that comics are cartoons, designed for child and the simple minded. However, they
serve an additional use for adults and mature audiences so that once all the homework is done,
relatively light reading material can be used in case they need to take a break from studying or hard
work. It is common to have frequently heard about troops in the war being sent comic books or
videogames and videogame magazines while deployed. The Marvel comics such as Spider-Man also
double as subliminal messages with one interpretation, although they usually are used to promote the
specific reader's own agenda instead of the big picture.
It started off as a quest to research the term “beat” in its relation to hipsterism or any “free love”
activity going on during the 60's and 70's. I came to its understanding of having been coined by Herb
Caen via beatnik and coming to be associated with certain more somewhat delinquent youth, turning to
any expression such as art and poetry while growing up in the shadow of the wars and under the
watchful eye of parents.

I was basically just trying to get laid.

“I'm cute,” thought the cat. “You're cute,” said the owner. “Thank you,” the cat replied.

“Kill a cat. Kill a cat.” “I am a cat/kill a cat?” the cat replied, saying those simultaneously. “Cat killer.”
“That's good.”

There was always the coincidential thing where whatever you read ends up being relevant. This had
been interesting me for a long time. It just improved your ability to see connections in seemingly
distinct works. Everyone has their own story to tell, it is said, and that can develop it some. It's
somewhat just a study of history as well.

Fossil remains from the Cambrian explosion came to signify the future creatures spoke of resembling
the heavy religious tones and extra dimensions.

Robinson Crusoe
Robinson Kreutznaer was born 1632 in York to a good family not of the country, although his father
came upon a good estate wherein he married the mother whose name was Robinson. Robinson was the
name of a good family unit in York at the time, although language corruption saw their name change
into Crusoe, if only to fit in better.

You might also like