You are on page 1of 3

MUCOLABIAL FOLD IN IMPRESSION-MAKING

3. Friedman, S.: Edentulous impression procedures for maximum 14. Tilton, G. E.: The denture periphery. J PROWHET DENT 2:290,
retention and stability. J PROSTHETDENT 7:14, 1957. 1952.
4. Lott, F., and Levin, B.: Flange technique: An automatic and 15. Lammie, G. A.: The retention of complete dentures. J Am Dent
physiologic approach to increased retention, function, comfort, Assoc 55:502, 1957.
and appearance of dentures. J PROSTHETDENT 16~394, 1966. 16. Edwards, L. F., and Boucher, C. 0.: Anatomy of the mouth in
5. Fry, K.: The retention of complete dentures. Br Dent J 44:97, relation to complete dentures. J Am Dent Assoc 29:331, 1942.
1923. 17. Barone, J. V.: Physiologic complete denture impressions. J
6. Moses, C. H.: Physical considerations in impression making. J PROSTHETDENT 13~800, 1963.
PROSTHETDENT 3~449, 1953. 18. Jacobson, T. E., and Krol, A. J.: A contemporary review of the
7. Howland, C. A.: The retention of artificial dentures. Dent Digest factors involved in complete denture retention, stability and
27~159, 19’1. support. Part I: Retention. J PROSTHETDENT 49:5, 1983.
8. Stamoulis, S.: Physical factors affecting the retention of complete 19. Jacobson, T. E., and Krol, A. J.: A contemporary review of the
dentures. J PROSTHETDENT 12:857, 1962. factors involved in complete dentures. Part 11: Stability. J
9. Brill, N.: Factors in the mechanism of full denture retention-A PROSTHETDENT 49:165, 1983.
discussion of selected papers. Dent Pratt (Bristol) l&9, 1967. 20. Jacobson, T. E., and Krol, A. J.: A contemporary review of the
10. Stanitz, J. D.: An analysis of the part played by the fluid film in factors involved in complete dentures. Part III: Support. J
denture retention. J Am Dent Assoc 32:445, 1948. PROSTHETDENT 49:306, 1983.
11. Snyder, F. C., Kimball, H. D., Bunch, W. B., and Beaton, J. H.:
Rqmnt reques1s to:
Effect of reduced atmospheric pressure upon retention of den-
tures. J Am Dent Assoc 32~445, 1945. DR. D. RAY MCARTHUR
12. Tyson, K. W.: Physical factors in retention of complete upper UNIVEKSITYOF NORTH CAROLINA
dentures. J PROSTHETDENT 18~90, 1967. SCHOOLOF DENTISTRY 209 H
13. Skinner, E. W., and Chung, P.: The effect of surface contact in CHAPEL HILL, NC 27514
the retention of a denture. J PROSTHETDENT 1:229, 1951.

The ala-tragus line in complete denture


prosthodontics
F. W. van Niekerk, B.D.S., D.D.S.,* V. J. Miller, B.Ch.D., B.Sc., M.R.I.C., C.Chem.,* and
R. E. Bibby, B.M.Sc., B.D.S., M.M.Sc., M.Dent.**
University of the Western Cape, Faculty of Dentistry, Tygerberg, Republic of South Africa

M any methods have been used to establish the


occlusal plane in complete denture prosthodontics. How-
border of the tragus of the ear, while Spratley’ describes
it as running from the center of the ala to the center of
ever, no single method seems to be fully accepted.‘z2 the tragus; and Ismail and Bowman2 define it as a line
Anteriorly, esthetic considerations help define the occlu- that passes from the ala of the nose to the center of the
sal plane, and posteriorly the tongue, retromolar pad, tragus of the external auditory meatus. The latter plane
and Stenson’s duct are considered.1-5Some dentists bisect proved unsatisfactory in our prosthetic clinic, because
the space between the residual ridges.6 the plane thus established often allowed insufficient
The technique of using the ala-tragus line (Camper’s space to arrange the maxillary molar teeth. Therefore,
line) to establish the occlusal plane is well docu- the posterior reference point was dropped to the inferior
mented.2,4~7-”However, definitions of the ala-tragus line border of the tragus (Fig. 1). This article concerns the
cause confusion, because the exact points of reference do relationship of the newly defined ala-tragus line to an
not agree. For example, the Glossary of Prosthodontic occlusal plane established with criteria that ignore the
TermslO states that the ala-tragus line runs from the ala-tragus line during jaw registration procedures.
inferior border of the ala of the nose to the superior
MATERIAL AND METHODS
*Senior Lecturer, Prosthetic Department. Thirty-three sets of complete dentures were made
**Professor and Head, Orthodontic Department. with criteria other than the ala-tragus line used to
THE JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY 67
Y.&NNIEKERK, MILLER, AND UYEtB’r

Fig. 1. Ala-tragus line with inferior border of tragus.


Fig. 2. Foil strips show relationship between occlus~i
plane and ala-tragus line with teeth in centric occiir-
establish the occlusal plane. Patients were completely sion.
satisfied with esthetics, function, and comfort. Lead foil
adapted to the right mandibular posterior teeth indicated
the occlusal plane. A strip of foil taped to the’ face plane. Conflicting definitions of the ala-tragus line must
pointed at the inferior borders of the ala and tragus. affect the usefulness of this technique. The location of
Lateral cephalometric radiographs were made of each the posterior landmark of the ala-tragus line defined in
patient by a standard method and traced on acetate this article required investigation.
paper to show the functional occlusal plane and the In this study, the ala-tragus line was ignored during
ala-tragus line. All radiographs were made with the the jaw registrations and the try-in. The occlusal plane
teeth in centric occlusion (Fig. 2). The relationship of the dentures was checked against the ala-tragus line
between the two planes was measured and the angle only at the final visit. Results showed a close relationship
between them given a positive value for posterior conver- between the two planes.
gence. Mean and standard deviation values were then It is interesting to speculate on the reason for the close
calculated for the relationship. correlation between the two planes. A radiographic
investigation of the bony landmarks involved could
RESULTS throw light on the question.
The angle formed by the functional occlusal plane and
the ala-tragus line had -a .mean of +2.45 degrees, a CONCLUSION
standard deviation of 3.24 degrees, and a range of +8-to The ala-tragus line described in this article has a close
-7.5 degrees. The mean difference between the planes relationship with the occlusal plane and could be used as
was 2.45 degrees with a standard deviation of 3.24 a landmark when the maxillary occlusion rim is trimmed
degrees. Such relatively narrow limits showed’s close to the occlusal plane. Positioning of the occlusal plane
relationship between the two planes. depends on mature clinical judgment and must ultimate-
ly satisfy esthetics, function, and denture stability.
I3IscUSSK)N
REFERENCES
It is easier for the less experienced dentist to use the 1. Spratley, M. Ii.: A simplified technique for determining rhe
ala-tragus line rather than intraoral reference points occlusal plane in full denture construction. 1 Oral Rehabil 73 1,
when the upper occlusion rim is trimmed to the occlusal 1980.

68 JANUARY 1985 VOLUME 53 NUMBER I


ALA-TRAGUS LINE

2. Ismail, Y. H., and Bowman, J. F.: Position of the occlusal plane 8. Sharry, J. J.: Complete Denture Prosthodontics, ed 3. New
in natural and artificial teeth. J PROSTHET DENT !20:407, York, 1974, McGraw-Hill Book Co., p 236.
1968. 9. Payne, S. H.: The trial dentures. Dent Clin North Am 21:326,
3. Yasaki, M.: Height of the occlusion rim and the interocclusal 1977.
distance. J PROSTHETDENT 11:26, 1961. 10. Academy of Denture Prosthetics: Glossary of Prosthodontic
4. Boucher, C. O., Hickey, J. C., and Zarb, G. A.: Prosthodontic Terms. St. Louis, 1977, The C.V. Mosby Co.
Treatment for Edentulous Patients, ed 7. St. Louis, 1975, The
Refmnt request, to:
C.V. Mosby Co.
DR. F. W. VAN NIEKERK
5. Standard, S. G.: Establishing the plane of occlusion in complete
UNIVERSITYOFTHE WESTERNCAPE
denture construction. J Am Dent Assoc 54845, 1957.
ORAL AND DENTAL TEACHING HOSPITAL
6. De Van, M. M.: An analysis of stress counter action on the part
FACULTYOF DENTISTRY
of the alveolar bone with a view to its preservation. Dent Cosmos
PRIVATE BAG Xl2
77:109, 1935.
TYCERBERC7505
7. Landa, S. L.: Practical guidelines for complete denture esthetics.
REPUBLICOF SOUTH AFRICA
Dent Clin North Am 21:289, 1977.

Studies of biologic parameters for denture design.


Part III: Effects of occlusal adjustment, base
retention, and fit on masseter muscle activity and
masticatory performance
Paul Perez, D.M.D.,* Krishan K. Kapur, D.M.D., M.D.,** and Neal R. Garrett, Ph.D.***
Veterans Administration Medical Center, Sepulveda, Calif.

lhe influence of denture factors on masticatory perfor- ed during chewing of test foods, was markedly less in
mance is limited.le6 It was unexpected to find that neither denture wearers than in subjects with natural denti-
denture retention nor occlusal scheme affects the masti- tion.” It was hypothesized that the reduced muscle effort
catory ability of denture wearers significantly. The applied by denture wearers might contribute to their
denture factors that did influence masticatory perfor- diminished chewing ability.
mance were those related to the manipulation of food The present study was undertaken to determine the
during chewing. It is important to recognize that masti- effects of denture base fit and occlusal correction on the
catory performance in these studies was measured mere- masseter muscle activity during chewing and the rela-
ly in terms of the ability of denture wearers to pulverize tionship between the electromyographic (EMG) activity
food. No attention was paid to the force or muscle effort and masticatory performance.
exerted by denture wearers during chewing.
Results of several studies indicate that poor masticato- METHODS
ry function in denture wearers may stem from altera- Twenty denture wearers, ranging from 46 to 80 years
tions in oral neuromuscular activity.‘-” An impairment of age (g = 62.7 years), were selected from the patient
in the ability of denture wearers to discriminate particle population of the Veterans Administration Medical
size and texture has been shown. A previous study also Center in Sepulveda, Calif. The total complete denture
revealed that integrated masseter muscle activity, record- experience for patients ranged from 2 to 46 years
(Z = 22.5 years). Subjects were screened to be healthy
Presented at the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Association for through a medical history and examination of the oral
Dental Research, Los Angeles, Calif. cavity. Each denture was assessedseparately for reten-
Supported by the Medical Service of the Veterans Administration. tion and stability on a four-point ordinal scale. The
*Staff Dentist and Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Califor-
maxillary and mandibular dentures were evaluated
nia, School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, Calif.
**Chief, Dental Service, Professor-in-Residence, University of Cali- together on a three-point scale separately for the vertical
fornia, School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, Calif. and horizontal occlusal relationships. Similarly, the
***Staff Physiologist. ridge shape and size, mucosal consistency, and location
THE JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY 69

You might also like