Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vanniekerk1985 Ala Tragus en Dentaduras PDF
Vanniekerk1985 Ala Tragus en Dentaduras PDF
3. Friedman, S.: Edentulous impression procedures for maximum 14. Tilton, G. E.: The denture periphery. J PROWHET DENT 2:290,
retention and stability. J PROSTHETDENT 7:14, 1957. 1952.
4. Lott, F., and Levin, B.: Flange technique: An automatic and 15. Lammie, G. A.: The retention of complete dentures. J Am Dent
physiologic approach to increased retention, function, comfort, Assoc 55:502, 1957.
and appearance of dentures. J PROSTHETDENT 16~394, 1966. 16. Edwards, L. F., and Boucher, C. 0.: Anatomy of the mouth in
5. Fry, K.: The retention of complete dentures. Br Dent J 44:97, relation to complete dentures. J Am Dent Assoc 29:331, 1942.
1923. 17. Barone, J. V.: Physiologic complete denture impressions. J
6. Moses, C. H.: Physical considerations in impression making. J PROSTHETDENT 13~800, 1963.
PROSTHETDENT 3~449, 1953. 18. Jacobson, T. E., and Krol, A. J.: A contemporary review of the
7. Howland, C. A.: The retention of artificial dentures. Dent Digest factors involved in complete denture retention, stability and
27~159, 19’1. support. Part I: Retention. J PROSTHETDENT 49:5, 1983.
8. Stamoulis, S.: Physical factors affecting the retention of complete 19. Jacobson, T. E., and Krol, A. J.: A contemporary review of the
dentures. J PROSTHETDENT 12:857, 1962. factors involved in complete dentures. Part 11: Stability. J
9. Brill, N.: Factors in the mechanism of full denture retention-A PROSTHETDENT 49:165, 1983.
discussion of selected papers. Dent Pratt (Bristol) l&9, 1967. 20. Jacobson, T. E., and Krol, A. J.: A contemporary review of the
10. Stanitz, J. D.: An analysis of the part played by the fluid film in factors involved in complete dentures. Part III: Support. J
denture retention. J Am Dent Assoc 32:445, 1948. PROSTHETDENT 49:306, 1983.
11. Snyder, F. C., Kimball, H. D., Bunch, W. B., and Beaton, J. H.:
Rqmnt reques1s to:
Effect of reduced atmospheric pressure upon retention of den-
tures. J Am Dent Assoc 32~445, 1945. DR. D. RAY MCARTHUR
12. Tyson, K. W.: Physical factors in retention of complete upper UNIVEKSITYOF NORTH CAROLINA
dentures. J PROSTHETDENT 18~90, 1967. SCHOOLOF DENTISTRY 209 H
13. Skinner, E. W., and Chung, P.: The effect of surface contact in CHAPEL HILL, NC 27514
the retention of a denture. J PROSTHETDENT 1:229, 1951.
2. Ismail, Y. H., and Bowman, J. F.: Position of the occlusal plane 8. Sharry, J. J.: Complete Denture Prosthodontics, ed 3. New
in natural and artificial teeth. J PROSTHET DENT !20:407, York, 1974, McGraw-Hill Book Co., p 236.
1968. 9. Payne, S. H.: The trial dentures. Dent Clin North Am 21:326,
3. Yasaki, M.: Height of the occlusion rim and the interocclusal 1977.
distance. J PROSTHETDENT 11:26, 1961. 10. Academy of Denture Prosthetics: Glossary of Prosthodontic
4. Boucher, C. O., Hickey, J. C., and Zarb, G. A.: Prosthodontic Terms. St. Louis, 1977, The C.V. Mosby Co.
Treatment for Edentulous Patients, ed 7. St. Louis, 1975, The
Refmnt request, to:
C.V. Mosby Co.
DR. F. W. VAN NIEKERK
5. Standard, S. G.: Establishing the plane of occlusion in complete
UNIVERSITYOFTHE WESTERNCAPE
denture construction. J Am Dent Assoc 54845, 1957.
ORAL AND DENTAL TEACHING HOSPITAL
6. De Van, M. M.: An analysis of stress counter action on the part
FACULTYOF DENTISTRY
of the alveolar bone with a view to its preservation. Dent Cosmos
PRIVATE BAG Xl2
77:109, 1935.
TYCERBERC7505
7. Landa, S. L.: Practical guidelines for complete denture esthetics.
REPUBLICOF SOUTH AFRICA
Dent Clin North Am 21:289, 1977.
lhe influence of denture factors on masticatory perfor- ed during chewing of test foods, was markedly less in
mance is limited.le6 It was unexpected to find that neither denture wearers than in subjects with natural denti-
denture retention nor occlusal scheme affects the masti- tion.” It was hypothesized that the reduced muscle effort
catory ability of denture wearers significantly. The applied by denture wearers might contribute to their
denture factors that did influence masticatory perfor- diminished chewing ability.
mance were those related to the manipulation of food The present study was undertaken to determine the
during chewing. It is important to recognize that masti- effects of denture base fit and occlusal correction on the
catory performance in these studies was measured mere- masseter muscle activity during chewing and the rela-
ly in terms of the ability of denture wearers to pulverize tionship between the electromyographic (EMG) activity
food. No attention was paid to the force or muscle effort and masticatory performance.
exerted by denture wearers during chewing.
Results of several studies indicate that poor masticato- METHODS
ry function in denture wearers may stem from altera- Twenty denture wearers, ranging from 46 to 80 years
tions in oral neuromuscular activity.‘-” An impairment of age (g = 62.7 years), were selected from the patient
in the ability of denture wearers to discriminate particle population of the Veterans Administration Medical
size and texture has been shown. A previous study also Center in Sepulveda, Calif. The total complete denture
revealed that integrated masseter muscle activity, record- experience for patients ranged from 2 to 46 years
(Z = 22.5 years). Subjects were screened to be healthy
Presented at the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Association for through a medical history and examination of the oral
Dental Research, Los Angeles, Calif. cavity. Each denture was assessedseparately for reten-
Supported by the Medical Service of the Veterans Administration. tion and stability on a four-point ordinal scale. The
*Staff Dentist and Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Califor-
maxillary and mandibular dentures were evaluated
nia, School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, Calif.
**Chief, Dental Service, Professor-in-Residence, University of Cali- together on a three-point scale separately for the vertical
fornia, School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, Calif. and horizontal occlusal relationships. Similarly, the
***Staff Physiologist. ridge shape and size, mucosal consistency, and location
THE JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY 69