Professional Documents
Culture Documents
09 - Chapters - 2
09 - Chapters - 2
2.1 Introduction:
2.2 Conceptual Framework:
2.2.1 Meaning and definition of Investment & Investment Management
2.2.2 Concept of Investment & Investment Management
2.2.3 Evolution and origin of Investment Management
2.2.4 Features of Investment Management
2.2.5 Scope of Investment Management
2.2.6 Functions of Investment Management
2.2.7 Objectives of Investment Management
2.3 Equity share valuation Models
2.3.1 Concept and nature of valuation models
2.3.2 Features of Share Valuation models
2.3.3. Need and importance of valuation Models
2.3.4 Types and Scope of valuation models
2.3.5. Critical evaluation
2.4 Conclusion
Chapter Second
Equity Share Valuation Models: Theoretical Background
2.1 Introduction:
Equity share valuation models were given by researcher’s time to time by
analysing the impact of different factors on movement of share price of companies.
The market price of shares cannot move isolated and suddenly, without any changes
in market condition or some associated phenomena affecting the company. It is
affected with factors like demand and supply of shares, prevailing market sentiments,
liquidity, the future prospects of the company, market condition, company
performance are just a few name. It is difficult and unreasonable to predict the
expected market price of share without giving importance to these associated factors.
For a layman it is difficult to judge and establish a suitable linkage between the
occurring event and its impact on changing price of shares. In this case equity share
valuation models help them. It provides compact methodology for calculation of
expected price of shares through the associated factors of price movements of shares.
26 | P a g e
the person. An investment is “the current commitment of money for a period of time
in order to derive future payments”. It compensates the investor in term of refund of
surplus money as return compare to amount invested for bearing the risk of
uncertainty of the future payments and the expected rate of inflation.
27 | P a g e
balancing their risk and return appetite. Now it involves professionally management
of fund for the future benefits by considering the different factors like importance of
time, low expenses, proper diversification, asset allocation, margin of safety and so
on.
28 | P a g e
2.2.5 Scope of Investment Management
The overall scope of investment management is quite wide as the investors are
represented by different groups i.e. an individual, firm, corporation, trust, or a
government. Everybody wants to grow their money. The main purpose behind an
investment is to generate good return. But to generate good return from the invested
amount, one’s requires having proper analysis and management of fund which can be
done with the help of investment management. So, the investment management
covers all investors group as stated above. In this present study, the researcher tried to
focus on retail investors of equity share.
29 | P a g e
appreciation
v. To save tax in short term or in long term
vi. To select an option which can meet their financial needs over their
lifetime
vii. To minimize the cost of management of assets and financial needs.
viii. To get peace of mind through having the financial security.
30 | P a g e
2.3.2 Features of Share Valuation Models
Share valuation models calculate the projected price of companies share.
As the valuation models gives the base price of company share and the market
price of share is fluctuated with multiple factors, it is expected that a share
valuation model has incorporated all these important factors which can rightly
predict the market price of share. A good share valuation models should have
the following important features:
It should have incorporated all the necessary factors of price changes.
It should rightly predict the expected price of share.
It should be user friendly in terms of calculation of price.
It should not create the ambiguity at the time of actual implementation.
It should not provide different figure to different users.
It should not be time consuming.
It should be economical and cost effective.
31 | P a g e
provides the calculated expected price of share which can be compare with the
actual price for decision making. In this way the valuation models play a
major role in deciding the target company for investment.
The key importance of share valuation models is highlighted as follows:
It helps in calculating the expected share price of company.
It helps in finding out the overpriced or under priced shares traded in
market.
It enables the efficient allocation of scare resources.
It helps in generating high return from investment of share.
It boosts confidence of investors in share market.
It provides moral assurance to investors for their invested money.
32 | P a g e
Investment Models
Walter's
Model
Discounted Gordon's
Cash Flow Model
Model
Investment
Models M &M
(Modigilani
H Model
and Miller
Model
Dividend
Traditional Discount
(Graham & Model( John
Dodd) Model Burr
Williams)
All the above stated models are furnished in details one by one by the researcher to
reflect the core concept of each model. They are as follows:
1. Walter’s Model
1. Walter’s Dividend Model (1963)
Walter's Model was developed by Prof. James E. Walter in 1963 to
determine the value of firm. Through the model Prof. Walter tried to reflect the
importance of dividend on overall valuation of firm. As per him the price of the share
usually influenced by two major factors that is:
i. Company’s dividend payout ratio
ii. Relationship between the Company’s cost of capital and
the internal rate of return.
He explained the impact of changes in dividend payout on the overall value of the
firm in connection to “Cost of Capital (k)” and “Internal Rate of Return (r)”:
33 | P a g e
Table No. 2.1 Walter Model: Dividend Payout and firm value
The above table clearly shows the impact of dividend payout on firm valuation with
respect of firm’s internal rate of return (r) and its cost of capital (k). If the firm’s “r” is
greater than “k” and it increases the dividend payment, then the overall value of the
firm will decrease and vice versa. It means that there is a negative relationship
between firm value and dividend payout in case of (r > k). While it has positive
relationship in case of (r < k) and neutral in case of (r = k).
D + r/k (E – D)
P=
k
Where,
P = Current Market price per Share
D = Dividend per Share
E = Earnings per Share
r = Internal rate of return
k = Cost of Capital
It can be seen with dummy data as
Let assume the D = Rs. 5/ share
E = Rs. 20/ Share
r = 8%
k = 6%
then, P = (5 + .08/.06(20-5))/.06
= Rs. 416.67
34 | P a g e
RESEARCHER OBSERVATION:
Though the Walter model included the dividend, earning, cost of capital and internal
rate of return for the calculation of market price of a share, but still it has following
issues and problems:
i. Source of finance: It was assumed that the retained earnings are the
only source of finance, but it is not realistic and feasible in this global
market as the firm uses debt also for their funding purpose for taking
advantage of trading on equity.
ii. Firm's business risk: its assumption of business risk does not change
with additional investments by stating constant r and k is not possible
as r and k changes with additional fund and change in other
circumstances which influenced the market price of share.
iii. No change in the key variables: Model assumption for constant
earnings per share (E) and dividends per share (D) is not possible as
the EPS and DPS varies time to time.
iv. Tax Impact: Impact of tax in movement of share price is overlooked
by this model.
v. Zero DPS: the calculated market price per share will come zero in case
of dividend per share is zero. It means, it is not applicable to non
dividend paying firm.
vi. External factors: it ignored following external factors
impact of government policy
change in interest rate,
flow of FDI and FII,
condition of foreign market,
GDP and National Income database,
Performance of sector in which company share belongs.
Price sensitive news relating to company either positive or
negative
35 | P a g e
2. Gordon’s Model
2. Gordon’s Model:
Gordon’s Model was developed by Myron J. Gordon to determine the value
of firm. Through this model Gordon tried to reflect the importance of dividend
on overall valuation of firm. As per him the price of a share is usually
influenced by dividend policy of the firm. He indicated that the dividend of a
company is expected to grow at constant rate in future, therefore the value of
company’s share, is the present value of future dividends. The developed
valuation model of Gordon is furnished as follows:
P= E (1-b) D0 (1+ g)
or
ke – br ke - g
Where,
b = Retention ratio
r = Rate of return on investment of an all equity firm.
br = g = Growth rate of earnings and dividends
Ke = Cost of equity capital / Rate of return expected by the
shareholders
P = Price of share
E = Earnings per share
1-b = Dividend payout ratio
D0 = Dividend per share
RESEARCHER OBSERVATION:
Though the Gordon model included the dividend, growth rate and cost of capital for
the calculation of market price of a share, but still it has following issues and
problems:
i. Source of finance: It was assumed that the firm is purely financed by
equity share or retained earning only and it not uses any external
financing. so there is no any debt capital, but it is not realistic and feasible
36 | P a g e
in this global market as the firm uses debt also for their funding purpose
for taking advantage of trading on equity.
ii. Firm's business risk: its assumption of business risk does not change
with additional investments by stating constant r and k is not possible as r
and k changes with additional fund and change in other circumstances
which influenced the market price of share.
iii. Perpetual Earning: the model assumed the perpetual earning of the firm
based on its perpetual life. But in reality many firms also incurs losses in
its life many time due to market scenario and other factors.
iv. Tax Impact: Model assumed that there is no corporate tax but it is in real
life.
v. Zero DPS: the calculated market price per share will come zero in case of
dividend per share is zero. It means, it is not applicable to non dividend
paying firm.
vi. Risk Factor: It ignored the effect of risk on the overall value of the firm.
vii. External Factors: The following external factors have been ignored in this
model:
Impact of government policy
Change in interest rate,
Flow of FDI and FII,
Condition of foreign market,
GDP and National Income database,
Performance of sector in which company share belongs.
Price sensitive news relating to company either positive or
negative
37 | P a g e
3. Traditional (Graham & Dodd)Model
P = m (D + E/3)
Where,
P = Market price of share
D = dividend per share
E = earnings per share
m = a multiplier
RESEARCHER OBSERVATION:
Though the Traditional model included the dividend and earnings for the calculation
of market price of a share, but still it has following issues and problems:
i. Assigned Weights: The weights provided by the Graham and Dodd in
this model are based on their subjective judgments.
ii. Deciding multiplier factor: There are no any set norms for assigning
the value of multiplier factor (m).
iii. Favourable dividend and market price: It is not always possible to
38 | P a g e
have the favourable impact of company’s liberal dividend payout
policy on their market price of share.
iv. Key variables: The model has only incorporated the importance of
dividend and earning.
v. Tax Impact: Impact of tax in movement of share price is overlooked
by this model.
vi. External Factors: The following external factors have been ignored in
this model.
impact of government policy
change in interest rate and fed rate
Changes in flow of FDI and FII,
condition of International market,
GDP and National Income database,
Performance of sector in which company share belongs.
Price sensitive news relating to company either positive
or negative
39 | P a g e
4. M &M (Modigilani and Miller) Model
P +D
P0 = 1 1
1 + Ke
Where,
P0 = Current Market price of per Share
D1 = Dividend to be received at the year end
P1 = Market value of the share at the year end
Ke = Cost of equity Capital or rate of capitalisation
RESEARCHER OBSERVATION:
Though the M & M model included the cost of equity and expected dividend for the
calculation of market price of a share, but still it has following issues and problems:
i. Expected Price and Expected Dividend: As the Model is based on
expected price and expected dividend at year end for the calculation of
present price, it becomes fully forecasted data which itself changes and
based on individual perception and judgment.
ii. Irrelevance of dividend: Dividend is a kind of return on investment
and investment is done for the return. Investors prefer and get attracted
towards the regular dividend paying companies which influence the
market price of a share. The Ezra Solomon also highlighted the
importance of present dividend in these words:
“In an uncertain world in which verbal statements can be
40 | P a g e
ignored or misinterpreted, dividend action does provide a clear-cut
means of ‘making a statement’ that speaks louder than a thousand
words”.
iii. Fixed Investment Policy: As the model assumed fixed investment
policy, it is not possible in this competitive business environment.
Organizations adopt and draft new policy for investment as per their
requirement time to time.
iv. No change in the key variables: Model assumption for Constant rate
of return (r), cost of capital (ke) and risk is not realistic as they changes
with market and business conditions.
v. Tax Impact: Non existence of taxes or same rate of tax for capital gain
and dividend payment is not right as presently tax is existed for both
and at different rate.
vi. Individual influence: In reality, Even an individual investor can
change the market sentiment of a particular share as against the model
assumption of no investor is large enough to influence the market price
of shares.
vii. External Factors: The following external factors have been ignored in
this model.
impact of government policy
change in interest rate and fed rate
Changes in flow of FDI and FII,
condition of International market,
GDP and National Income database,
Performance of sector in which company share belongs.
Price sensitive news relating to company either positive
or negative
41 | P a g e
5. Dividend Discount Model (John Burr Williams)
Zero growth Model based on the assumption that the dividends always remain the
same. So the share price of company is equal to the annual dividends divided by the
Rate of Return (ROR). Therefore, the stockholders can expect that their future
earnings will be flat as there will not be any further increase in the dividends payout.
D
P = 1
Ke
42 | P a g e
Where,
P0 = Current Market price per Share
D1 = Dividend to be received at the year end
Ke = Cost of equity Capital or rate of capitalisation
RESEARCHER OBSERVATION:
Though the Zero Growth Dividend model included the cost of equity and expected
dividend for the calculation of market price of a share, but still it has following issues
and problems:
i. Expected Dividend: As the Model is based on expected dividend at
year end for the calculation of present price, it becomes fully
forecasted data which itself changes and based on individual
perception and judgment.
ii. No change in the key variables: Model assumption of Constant
dividend is not realistic as they changes with market and business
conditions.
iii. Tax Impact: Impact of tax in movement of share price is overlooked
by this model.
iv. External Factors: The following external factors have been ignored in
this model.
impact of government policy
change in interest rate and fed rate
Changes in flow of FDI and FII,
condition of International market,
GDP and National Income database,
Performance of sector in which company share belongs.
Price sensitive news relating to company either positive
or negative
43 | P a g e
increased the dividend steadily over the years.
D
P = 1
Ke - g
Where,
P0 = Current Market price per Share
D1 = Dividend to be received at the year end
g = dividend growth rate
Ke = Cost of equity Capital or rate of capitalisation
RESEARCHER OBSERVATION:
Though the Constant Growth Dividend model included the cost of equity, dividend
growth rate and expected dividend for the calculation of market price of a share, but
still it has following issues and problems:
i. Expected Dividend: Calculation of expected dividend is based on
dividend growth rate of the company. The calculated value of growth
rate may differ person to person due to their individual perception and
judgment for the selection of time duration.
ii. Growth Rate: if the firm has not declared dividend in a particular year
the calculation of growth rate in next year not possible as the base
amount becomes nil.
iii. No change in the key variables: Model assumption of Constant rate of
growth in dividend is not realistic as they changes with market and
business conditions along with the management policies.
iv. Tax Impact: Impact of tax in movement of share price is overlooked
by this model.
v. External Factors: The following external factors have been ignored in
this model.
impact of government policy
change in interest rate and fed rate
Changes in flow of FDI and FII,
condition of International market,
44 | P a g e
GDP and National Income database,
Performance of sector in which company share belongs.
Price sensitive news relating to company either positive
or negative
D (1+ g ) t
P= 0 1 + D0 (1+ g2)
t
(1 + Ke ) k e– g 2
Where,
P0 = Current Market price per Share
D0 = Dividend to be received at the year end
g
1 = Market value of the share at the year end
g
2= Stable growth rate
45 | P a g e
RESEARCHER OBSERVATION:
Though the two stage Dividend Growth model included the cost of equity,
extraordinary and stable dividend growth rate for the calculation of market price of a
share, but still it has following issues and problems:
i. Extraordinary and Stable growth rate: It is not confirms that
company will grow at stable rate after a certain period. Fluctuation
always arises during its life cycle.
ii. Growth Rate: if the firm has not declared dividend in a particular year
the calculation of growth rate in next year not possible as the base
amount becomes nil.
iii. Time Period: Time period of extraordinary growth is also not fixed
and it may vary person to person based on their prediction and
estimation.
iv. No change in the key variables: Model assumption of Constant rate of
growth in dividend after a certain time is not realistic as they changes
with market and business conditions along with the management
policies.
v. Tax Impact: Impact of tax in movement of share price is overlooked
by this model.
vi. External Factors: The following external factors have been ignored in
this model.
impact of government policy
change in interest rate and fed rate
Changes in flow of FDI and FII,
condition of International market,
GDP and National Income database,
Performance of sector in which company share belongs.
Price sensitive news relating to company either positive
or negative
46 | P a g e
6. H Model
6. H Model
The H-model is used to value a stock when it is assumed that the dividend growth
will change from one growth rate to another in a linear manner. This model basically
incorporated the impact of dividend along with its expected change of growth rate, on
the company’s share price. The model is based on the theme of company’s growth or
decline trends, over the time, but the growth rate not remains constant. It assumes the
two phases of growth rate. At the one phase the growth rate is normal and in other it
seems abnormal growth. The abnormal rate of growth represents the gradual change
in dividend rates over the time. It is the increase or decrease in regular manner each
year. For example, a company’s dividend growth rate may decline by 2% each year
for three years to transition from 15% to 9%. The rate of change remains consistent
but the growth rate itself gradually decreases.
r - gn r - gn
Where,
P0 = Current Market price per Share
DPS0 = Dividend Per Share
r = required rate of return to equity investor
ga=growth rate initially (abnormal growth rate)
gn=growth rate at the end of 2H years applied for ever after that
(normal growth rate)
47 | P a g e
RESEARCHER OBSERVATION:
Though the “H” Model included the cost of equity, extraordinary and stable dividend
growth rate for the calculation of market price of a share, but still it has following
issues and problems:
i. Decline in growth rate: The assumption of linear decline in growth
rate not reasonable in this global market scenario. Fluctuation may
arise at different rate.
ii. Growth Rate: if the firm has not declared dividend in a particular year
the calculation of growth rate in next year not possible as the base
amount becomes nil.
iii. Time Period: Time period of normal growth is also not fixed and it
may vary person to person based on their prediction and estimation.
iv. Tax Impact: Impact of tax in movement of share price is overlooked
by this model.
v. External Factors: The following external factors have been ignored in
this model.
impact of government policy
change in interest rate and fed rate
Changes in flow of FDI and FII,
condition of International market,
GDP and National Income database,
Performance of sector in which company share belongs.
Price sensitive news relating to company either positive
or negative
48 | P a g e
7. Discounted Cash Flow Model
7. Discounted Cash Flow Model
A discounted cash flow (DCF) is given to determine the value of a firm which can
be used for deciding the attractiveness of an investment opportunity. It is based on
discounted future free cash flow. The present value of a share is estimated through the
discounting the estimated future free cash flow of the organisation. Through this
model, it is tried to reflect the importance of free cash flow on the overall valuation of
a firm. If the calculated value is higher than the market price of a share, then it is a
good opportunity and time for the purchase of company’s share.
Where,
CF = Cash Flow
r = discount rate
RESEARCHER OBSERVATION:
Though the “Discounted Cash Flow” Model included the cost of equity and projected
future cash flow for the calculation of market price of a share, but still it has following
issues and problems:
i. Projected Cash Flow: It is projection based and the calculated value of
projected future cash flow differs from person to person.
ii. No change in the key variables: The assumption of constant discount
rate for finding out the present value of a share, is also not realistic in
this rapidly changing business environment.
iii. Tax Impact: Impact of tax in movement of share price is overlooked
by this model.
49 | P a g e
iv. External Factors: The following external factors have been ignored in
this model.
Impact of government policy
Change in interest rate and fed rate
Changes in flow of FDI and FII,
Condition of International market,
GDP and National Income database,
Performance of sector in which company share belongs.
Price sensitive news relating to company either positive
or negative
1.3.5. Critical evaluation
Table No. 2.2 Critical Evaluation of Models
Models Walter’s Gordon’s Traditional M &M Dividend H Discounted
Model Model Model Model Discount Model Cash Flow
Details
Model
Company’s
Financial No No No No No No No
Condition
Past record of
Dividend and No No No No No No No
Bonus declaration
Industry/ Sector
Performance No No No No No No No
Tax Impact No No No No No No Yes
Global market
scenario No No No No No No No
Political stability
No No No No No No No
Government
policy and No No No No No No No
decision making
Flow of FII/ FDI
No No No No No No No
Economic
condition of the No No No No No No No
country
Other investment
option and their No No No No No No No
return
Source: Researcher observation
50 | P a g e
2.4 Conclusion:
The present chapter deals with the conceptual framework of investment management.
It provides information about the available share valuation models, methods of
calculation of expected market price of shares along with attached problems and
shortcoming.
This chapter broadly covers concepts, features, scope, functions, and
objectives of investment management. It also throws light on the share valuation
models which is the crux of this study. Hence, this chapter helped in creating
theoretical foundation for the present research study.
***
51 | P a g e