Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hve 2016 0002 PDF
Hve 2016 0002 PDF
ISSN 2397-7264
Two basic leader connection scenarios Received on 3rd February 2016
Revised on 24th March 2016
observed in negative lightning attachment Accepted on 1st April 2016
doi: 10.1049/hve.2016.0002
process www.ietdl.org
Weitao Lu 1, 2 ✉, Qi Qi 1,2, Ying Ma 1,2, Luwen Chen 3, Xu Yan 3, Vladimir A. Rakov 4, Daohong Wang 5,
Yijun Zhang 1, 2
1
State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
2
Laboratory of Lightning Physics and Protection Engineering, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
3
Institute of Tropical and Marine Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China
4
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
5
Department of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan
✉ E-mail: wtlu@camscma.cn
Abstract: High-speed video images of 24 downward negative lightning flashes terminating on tall structures in Guangzhou
are selected to analyse the connecting behaviour of the downward and upward leaders during the attachment process
preceding the first return stroke. Three types of leader connecting behaviour have been observed: Type I, the tip of
downward leader (DL) to the tip of upward connecting leader (UCL), which accounts for 42% of all the events (10/24);
Type II, the DL’s tip to the lateral surface of UCL, which accounts for 50% (12/24); and Type III, the combination of
Types I and II, which accounts for 8% (2/24). For the two cases of Type III behaviour, each case had two junction points
(one with Type I and the other with Type II behaviour) between the downward and upward leaders. Therefore, Types I
and II can be viewed as the two basic types of the leader connecting behaviour during the attachment process in
negative lightning. No attachment process exhibited the connection of the UCL’s tip to the lateral surface of DL. The
presence of multiple DL branches and their integrated effect on the development of positive UCL/UCLs are likely to be
the main reasons for the Type II behaviour.
1 Introduction and connecting upward leaders from tall towers in Rapid City,
South Dakota, USA. Lu et al. analysed the attachment processes
The lightning attachment process is one of the least understood of two downward negative lightning flashes in [11] and the
lightning processes. Understanding of the lightning attachment characteristics of 45 unconnected upward leaders that occurred in
process is vital for improving lightning protection techniques [1, 19 downward negative flashes terminating on tall structures in
2]. Dwyer and Uman compiled a list of the top 10 unanswered Guangzhou in [12]. Three-dimensional propagation characteristics
questions in lightning research in [3], in which the third one is of the leaders in the lightning attachment process were studied by
‘What is the physical mechanism of leader attachment to elevated using the two-station optical observation data [13, 14].
objects on the ground and to the flat ground? What are the As the DL and the UCL approach each other, it is generally
characteristics of upward connecting leaders from those objects or thought that the DL’s tip and the UCL’s tip will come in contact
from the ground?’. with each other [15–17]. However, Lu et al. presented a negative
Recent availability of advanced instrumentation for the optical lightning flash in which the attachment process exhibited an
imaging of lightning enabled new insights into the lightning unexpected behaviour [18]. The connection of the DL’s tip to the
attachment process. Wang et al. gave in [4] the well-known lateral surface of the UCL was first reported. Are there any other
streaked image sketch of the attachment process of the dart leader/ scenarios leading to the contact of the DL and the UCL? Our
return-stroke sequence based on optical signals from paper will attempt to answer this question by analysing 24
rocket-triggered lightning captured by the automatic lightning negative lightning flashes terminating on tall structures observed in
progressing feature observation system. The system had a time Guangzhou, China, during 2009–2014.
resolution of about 100 ns and a spatial resolution of about 3.6 m.
A new high-speed electro-optical system for studying lightning
attachment process, named lightning attachment process 2 Experiment
observation system (LAPOS) [5], has been developed by Wang
et al. and used to observe the attachment process of both A field experiment, mainly focusing on the observation of lightning
rocket-triggered [6, 7] and natural [8] lightning. In [8], Wang et al. flashes terminating on tall structures, has been conducted since 2009
found that all strokes in three natural lightning flashes initiated at a in Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, at the Tall-Object Lightning
point above ground and propagated bidirectionally from that point, Observatory in Guangzhou (TOLOG). Detailed information about
similar to the return strokes of rocket-triggered lightning. Jiang the experiment and the instruments installed at the TOLOG can be
et al. [9] analysed the grounding process of 37 natural downward found in [12, 18]. Three high-speed cameras, two Photron
negative lightning flashes, and inferred that the upward connecting FASTCAM SA5 (HC-1 and HC-2) and one Photron FASTCAM
leaders (UCLs) tend to be induced by downward leader (DL) SA3 (HC-3), were installed to capture the high-speed optical
branches having brighter luminosity and lower channel tip height images of lightning flashes. They were operated at sampling rates
above ground. Warner [10] presented high-speed video of 10,000 fps (frame exposure time of 99,754 ns and dead time of
observations (up to 11,000 frames per second, fps) of six 246 ns), 50,000 fps (frame exposure time of 19,754 ns and dead
downward negative stepped leaders and associated non-connecting time of 246 ns), and 1000 fps (frame exposure time of 998,684 ns
and dead time of 1316 ns), respectively. The higher the sampling larger than the numbers given in Table 1 for the following reasons:
rate, the smaller the field of view (FOV) of the high-speed camera. the high-speed cameras need some time (dead time between
Two multi-channel LAPOSs were installed and the output of one triggers) to save images to computers for each event and flashes that
channel of one of the LAPOSs was used for triggering all three occurred during the dead time could not be captured; the FOVs of
high-speed cameras. The GPS time of the triggering signal (with the high-speed cameras were not fixed during the experiment and
an uncertainty of 30 ns) was provided by a GPS synchronisation sometimes some structures were out of the FOVs; sometimes the
system manufactured by the Beijing Taifu Te Electronic visibility was very low (mostly caused by heavy rain) and some
Technology Company. flashes even in the FOVs could not trigger our systems.
The tall structures in the FOV of HC-3 are shown in Fig. 1. It is Although a total of 56 flashes were captured, the high-speed
known that the higher the structure, the earlier the UCL can be images of 32 flashes are not suitable for the analysis of the
initiated from the top of the structure and the farther the UCL can connecting behaviour of the DL and the UCL during the
extend. If the length of the UCL is not long enough, it is hard to attachment process for the following two reasons. The first one is
capture it by our high-speed cameras, making it almost impossible the lack of clear images of the lightning channel (part or whole)
to study the leader connecting behaviour during the attachment due to the low visibility or the cloud obscuration, which is the
process. In this paper, only flashes to the eight structures higher reason for nine flashes to A, one flash to B, two flashes to C, two
than 300 m, labelled A–H in Fig. 1, are analysed. All of the flashes to D, and one flash to F. The second reason is the
flashes observed at the TOLOG are labelled as ‘FYYsn’, where relatively low sampling rate of the high-speed camera HC-3,
‘YY’ denotes the last two digits of the year and ‘sn’ denotes the which is the reason for 17 flashes to these tall structures.
sequential number of the flash in year ‘YY’. Overall, there are 24 flashes to six structures that can be used to
analyse the leader connecting behaviour during the attachment
process preceding the first return stroke. The results show that the
3 Analysis and results connecting behaviour can be grouped in three types.
During 2009–2014, a total of 56 lightning flashes with terminations on 3.1 Type I: Tip-to-Tip
the structures A–H were captured by our high-speed cameras. All of
them were downward negative flashes. The number of flashes that Among the 24 flashes, 10 (42%) exhibited the connection of the DL’s tip
struck each structure is given in Table 1. It should be noted that the to the UCL’s tip (Tip-to-Tip, Type I). One event is presented here. Figs. 2
actual numbers of flashes terminated on structures A–H should be and 3 show selected frames of the high-speed images of flash F1263. It
can be seen that under the influence of the DL with many branches, there
Table 1 Number of tall-object lightning flashes observed at the TOLOG were three long upward leaders initiated from structures A, C, and D. For
during 2009–2014 the three upward leaders, although each tip moved to a higher altitude
Structure Height End of Number Number of
than that of the lowest tip of the nearby DL branch in the
construction of flashes that two-dimensional (2D) image (Fig. 2a), only the upward leader initiated
year flashes can be from A made contact with a branch of the DL (Fig. 2b). From the
observed used to high-speed images captured by HC-1 (Fig. 2) and HC-2 (Fig. 3), it can
analyse the
leader
be determined that the DL and the UCL of F1263 exhibited the
connecting ‘Tip-to-Tip’ connection, which is also evidenced by the smooth shape
behaviour of the lightning channel near the junction point (which is between the
tips of the DL and the UCL seen in Figs. 2a and 3d).
A 610 m (2009) 2009 19 8
600 m (after 2009)
B 530 m 2014 9 2
C 440 m 2009 12 7
3.2 Type II: DL’s Tip to the lateral surface of UCL
D 360 m 2010 9 5
E 310 m 2010 3 0 The non-‘Tip-to-Tip’ connecting behaviour during the lightning
F 305 m 2010 3 1 attachment process was first reported in [18]. It can be clearly seen
G 305 m 2014 1 1 from Fig. 4 (Fig. 2f in [18]) that the connection occurred between
H 300 m 2012 0 0
total 300–610 m 2009–2014 56 24 DL’s tip and the lateral surface of UCL, with the junction point
being over 67 m below the UCL’s tip. In flash F1111, it is found
that the effect of the DL on the UCL is significant, especially during bends sharply toward the UCL and both the speed and the
the final 160 µs preceding the beginning of return stroke, during luminosity of the DL show significant increasing trend; the ratio of
which the UCL’s speed quickly increase from the order of 105 m/s the DL’s speed and the UCL’s speed exhibits an overall trend to
to the order of 106 m/s and the UCL’s luminosity exhibits fast decrease and can be significantly less than 1, which means the
increase too. On the other hand, the effect of the UCL on the DL UCL’s speed can significantly exceed that of the DL.
appears to be negligible until the distance between the leaders Three additional events that terminated on structures A, C, and D
decreases to less than approximately 60 m. After that, the DL and exhibited Type II connecting behaviour are shown in Figs. 5–7,
Fig. 3 Six frames of the high-speed images of flash F1263 captured by HC-2 with a sampling rate of 50,000 fps. The exposure duration of each frame is given.
Time 0 is set at the onset of the first return stroke, occurring just after the end of the exposure of frame (e)
a −0.10 to −0.08 ms
b −0.08 to −0.06 ms
c −0.06 to −0.04 ms
d −0.04 to −0.02 ms
e −0.02 to –0.00 ms
f 0.58 to 0.60 ms
Fig. 5 Two frames of the high-speed images of flash F1443 captured by HC-2 with a sampling rate of 50,000 fps
a Last frame preceding the first return stroke
b Ninth frame after the first return stroke
Fig. 8 Three frames of the high-speed images of flash F1248 captured by HC-2 with a sampling rate of 50,000 fps
a −0.04 to −0.02 ms
b −0.02 to 0.00 ms
c 0.28 to 0.30 ms
Fig. 9 Two frames of the high-speed images of flash F1264 captured by HC-1 with a sampling rate of 10,000 fps. In (a), the first connection occurred at JP1 and
the second connection did not occur yet (note a small gap near the bright channel). Most pixels in the frame subsequent to (a), which is not shown here, are
saturated. The return stroke channel in (b), which is the fourth frame after the first return stroke, shows that there exists a second connection (at JP2)
between a branch of the DL and the lateral surface of the UCL
a −0.10 to 0.00 ms
b 0.30 to 0.40 ms
was captured by HC-1 and HC-2. Due to the relatively low sampling lateral surface of DL, seen only in the HC-1 record. Considering
rate, the HC-1 records of F1421 cannot adequately resolve the the relatively low sampling rate of the HC-1 and different
connection behaviour of the leaders during the attachment process. scenarios seen in HC-1 and higher sampling rate HC-2 records
Indeed, three frames of HC-2 records of F1421, shown in Fig. 11, for F1421 (Fig. 11), we believe that F1222 actually had the Type
reveal a scenario that is different from the apparent one from the I connection behaviour.
HC-1 record. The junction point was actually between the tip of
UCL and the tip of a short DL branch that can be seen only in
Fig. 11b. The other case, Flash F1417 (not shown here), also has a 4 Conclusions
short DL branch (facilitating connection to the UCL tip) prior to
the first return stroke. Hence, both F1417 and F1421 actually High-speed video camera records, with sampling rates up to 50,000
exhibit Type I connection behaviour. fps, of 24 negative lightning flashes terminating on tall structures in
Among the 24 flashes analysed in this paper, 22 (92%) had Guangzhou are examined. The diversity of the connecting behaviour
upward leader/leaders with the tip higher than the lowest tip of between the downward negative and upward positive leaders during
the DL (in the 2D images) before the final connection, 12 the attachment process preceding the first return stroke is revealed.
exhibited Type I connecting behaviour (the DL’s tip to the lateral Two basic types of leader connecting behaviour during the
surface of UCL), and only one flash, F1222, exhibited attachment process are found: one is ‘the DL’s tip to the UCL’s
questionable connecting behaviour with the UCL’s tip to the tip’ (‘Tip-to-Tip’, Type I) and the other one is ‘the DL’s tip to the
Fig. 11 Three frames of the high-speed images of flash F1421 captured by HC-2 with a sampling rate of 50,000 fps. The brightness and contrast of (a) and (b)
are enhanced for a better view. As seen in (b) and (c), the leader connecting behaviour was of Type I
a and b Last two frames preceding the first return stroke
c 11th frame after the first return stroke