has no basis for its claim of a right of first refusal FACTS: under the lease contract. In 1974, Delfin Pacheco and his sister, Pelagia Pacheco, were the owners of 27,169 square meters of real estate identified as Lot No. 1095, Malinta Estate, in the Municipality of Polo (now Valenzuela), Province of Bulacan (now Metro Manila) which is covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No. T-4240 of the Bulacan land registry.
On April 3, 1974, the said co-owners leased
to Construction Components International Inc. the same property and providing 'that during the existence or after the term of this lease' the lessor should he decide to sell the property leased shall first offer the same to the lessee and the latter has the priority to buy under similar conditions.On August 3, 1974, lessee Construction Components International, Inc. assigned its rights and obligations under the contract of lease in favor of Hydro Pipes Philippines, Inc. with the signed conformity and consent of lessors Delfin Pacheco and Pelagia Pacheco. The contracts of lease, as well as the assignment of lease were annotated at the back of the title, as per stipulation of the parties.
On the ground that it was not given the first
option to buy the leased property pursuant to the proviso in the lease agreement, respondent Hydro Pipes Philippines, Inc., filed an amended complaint for reconveyance of Lot. No. 1095 in its favor under conditions similar to those whereby Delpher Trades Corporation acquired the property from Pelagia Pacheco and Delfin Pacheco.
ISSUE:
WON the "Deed of Exchange" of the
properties executed by the Pachecos on the one hand and the Delpher Trades Corporation on the other was meant to be a contract of sale.
HELD:
No. The "Deed of Exchange" of property
between the Pachecos and Delpher Trades Corporation cannot be considered a contract of sale. There was no transfer of actual ownership interests by the Pachecos to a third party. The Pacheco family merely changed their ownership from one form to another. The ownership remained