Flexible Pavement Design
Using
The Asphalt Institute Method
[The following pages, describing the Asphalt Institute Method, are
excerpts from Traffic and Highway Engineering by Nicolas J.
Garber and Lester A. Hoel, West Publishers, 1988]792
DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS.
GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT DESIGN
In the design of flexible pavements, the pavement. structure is usually considered
as a multilayeted elastic system, with the material in each layer characterized by
certain physical properties that may include the modulus of elasticity, the resilient
modulus, and the Poisson ratio. It is usually assumed that the subgrade layer is
infinite in both the horizontal and vertical directions, whereas the other layers are
finite in the vertical direction and infinite in the horizontal direction. The applica-
tion of a wheel load causes, a stress distribution, which can be represented as
shown in Figure 18.2. The maximum vertical stresses are compressive and occur
directly under the wheel load. These decrease with increase in depth from the
surface. The maximum horizontal stresses also occur directly under the wheel
“load but can be either tensile or compressive as shown in Figure 18.2(c). When the
load and pavement thickness are within certain ranges, horizontal compressive
stresses will occur above the neutral axis, whereas horizontal tensile stresses
will occur below the neutral axis. The temperature distribution within the pave-
ment structure, as shown in Figure 18.2(d), will also have an effect on the
magnitude of the stresses. The design of the pavement is therefore generally
Figure 18.2 Typical Stress and Temperature Distributions in a Flexible Pavement Under
a Wheel Load
‘Wheel load, W c
Compression Tension =— =
[esas
] ee )
(2) Pavement layers (b) Distribution of (c) Distribution of (d) Temperature
Vertical stress” horizontal stress distribution
Under eenterine Under centerline
of whet oad of wheel load
P= wheel pressure applied on pavement surface
a= radius of circular area over which whee load is spread
= compressive horizontal stress
1 tensile horizontal stress -DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS 793
Figure 18.3 Spread of Wheel Load Pressure Through Pavement Structure
Wheel load, W
or onan
TOsEALE
(a) Stress distribution within different (b) General form
components of the pavement of stress
reduction
Source: Reproduced from Thickness Design—Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets,
Manual Series No. 1, The Asphalt Institute, College Park, Md., September 1981.
based on strain criteria that limit both the horizontal and vertical strains below
those that will cause excessive cracking and excessive permanent deformation.
These criteria are considered in terms of repeated load applications since it is
known that the accumulated repetitions of the traffic loads are of significant,
importance to the development of cracks and permanent deformation of the
pavement.
Figure 18.4 Schematic of Tensile and Compressive Stresses in Pavement Structure
Wheel load; W »
or Raw
pavenent wee
o—COlNERESSION — —om TENSION
Source: Reproduced from Thickitess Design—Asphalt Pavemiénts for Highways and Streets,
Manual Series No. 1, The Asphalt Institute, College Park, Md., September 1981794
DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS
The availability of highly sophisticated computerized sohitions for multi-
layered systems, coupled with recent advances in materials evaluation, has led to
the development of several design methods that are based wholely or partly on
theoretical analysis.*“" The more commonly used design methods are the Asphalt
Institute method, the AmericanAssociation of State Highway and Trans-
portation Officials (AASHTO) method, and the California method. These are
presented in the following sections.
Asphalt Institute Design Method
In the Asphalt Institute design method, the pavement is represented as a multi-
layered elastic system. The wheel load Wis assumed to be applied through the tire
as a uniform vertical pressure po, which is then spread by the different compo-
nents of tlie pavement structure and eventually applied on the subgrade as a much
lower stress p,. This is shown in Figure 18.3. Experience, established theory, and
test data are then used to evaluate two specific stress-strain conditions. The first,
shown in Figure 18.3(b), is the general way in which the stress py is reduced to p,
within the depth of the pavement structure and the second, shown in Figure
18.4, is the tensile and compressive stresses and strains imposed on the asphalt
due to the deflection caused by the wheel load. Thickness design charts were
-.developed, based on criteria for maximum tensile strains at the bottom of the
asphalt layer and maximum vertical compressive strains at the top of the sub-
grade layer. The procedure originally involved the use of a computer program,
but the charts presented here can be used without computers. A detailed descrip-
tion of the method is given in Thickness Design—Asphalt Pavements for High-
ways and Streets.’
Design Procedure
The principle adopted in the design procedure is to determine the minimum
thickness of the asphalt layer that will adequately withstand the stresses that
develop for the two strain criteria discussed earlier—that is, the vertical compres-
sive strain at the surface of the subgrade and the horizontal tensile strain at the
bottom of the asphalt layer. Design charts have been prepared for a range of
traffic loads. This range is usually adequate for normal traffic volumes encoun-
tered in practice. However, when this range is exceeded, the computer version
should be used.
The procedure consists of five main steps.
1. Select or determine input data.
2. Select surface and base materials.
3. Determine minimum thickness required for input data. :
4. Evaluate feasibility of staged construction and prepare stage construction
plan, if necessary.
5. Carry out economic analyses of alternative designs and select the best
design.DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS 795
Step 1: Design Inputs. The design inputs in this method are traffic charac-
teristics, subgrade engineering properties, and subbase and base engineering
properties.
Traffic Characteristics. The traffic characteristics are determined in terms of
the number of repetitions of an 18,000 Ib (80 kilonewtons (KN)) single-axle load
applied to the pavement on two sets of dual tires, This is usually referred to as the
equivalent single-axle load (ESAL). The dual tites are represented as two circular
plates each 4.52 in. in diameter, spaced 13.57 in. apart. This representation corre-
sponds to a contact pressure of 70 lb/in.?. The use of an 18,000 1b axle load is
based on the results of experiments that have shown that the effect of any load on
the performance of a pavement can be represented in terms of the number of
single applications of an 18,000 Ib single axle. A series of equivalency factors used
in this method for axle loads are given in Table 18.3.
To determine the ESAL, the number of different types of vehicles such as
cars, bises, single-unit trucks, and multiple-unit trucks expected to use the facility
_ during its lifetime must be known. The distribution ‘of the different types of
vehicles expected to use the proposed highway can be obtained from results of
classification counts that are taken by state highway agencies at regular intervals.
In cases where these data are not available, estimates can be made from Table
18.4, which gives representative values for the United States. When the axle load
of each vehicle type is known, these can then be converted to equivalent 18,000 Ib
loads using the equivalency factors given in Table 18.3. The equivalent 18,000 lb
load can also be determined from the vehicle type, if the axle load is unknown, by
using a truck factor for that vehicle type. The truck factor is defined as the
number of 18,000 Ib sirigle-load applications caused by a single passage of a
~-vehicle, These have been determined for each class of vehicle from the expression
truck factor = 2_(tumber of axles x load equivalency factor)
number of vehicles
Table 18.5 gives values of truck factors for different classes of vehicles; however,
these factors are based on data collected prior to the deregulation of the trucking
industry. Recent-analysis of limited data has shown that truck factors can be as
high as 5.0, even though the maximum value given in-Table 18.5 is only 1.99.
Therefore, itis advisable, when truck factors are to be used, to collect data on axle j
loads for the different types of vehicles expected to use the proposed highway and
to determine realistic values of truck factors from that data.
The total ESAL applied on the highway during its design period can be
determined only after the design period and traffic growth factors aré known. The
design period is the number of years the pavement will effectively continue to
carry the traffic load without requiring an overlay. Flexible highway pavements
are usually designed for a 20-year period. Since traffic volume does not remain
constant over the design period of the pavement, it is essential that the rate of
growth be determined and applied when calculating the total ESAL. Annual
growth rates can be obtained from regional planning agencies or from state796 ° DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS
Tablé 18.3. Load Equivalency Factors
Load Equivateney Load Equivalency
Gross Axle Load oe Gross Axle Load ae
Single Tandem Single | Tandem
“a ® Axles Axles 2 ® Axles | Axles
445 | 1,000 | 0.00002 1825 | 41,000 | 2327 2.2
89 2.000 | 0.00018 170 | 42000 | 2564 251
1335 | 3,000 | o.oga7e 191.3 | ° 43000 -| 2022 275
178 4,000) 0.00209 195.7 | 44000 | 31.00 3.00
2225 | 5000 | 0.00500 200.0 | 45,000 | 34.00 327
26.7 600 | ‘o.01043 204.5 | 46000 | 37.24 3.55
316 | 7000 | o.0196 200.0 | 47000 | 40.78 | 3.85
35.6 8000 | 0.0343 2135 | 48000 | 44.50 an
400 9000 | ‘0.0502 2180 | 49000 | 4854 451
445 | 10,000 | 0.0877 | oooss | 2224 | 50,000 | s2ee 4.96
48.9 | 11,000 | 0.1311 | ootooa | 2268 | 51,000 523
saa | 12000 | ~-o11@9 corse | 231.3 | 52,000 563
57.8 | 13000 | 0.264 0.019 | 2357 | 53,000 6.04
623 | 14000 | » 0.360 0.0270 | 240.2 | 54,000 6.47
65.7 | 15000 | 07a 0.0360 | 244.6 | 55,000 6.93
71.2 | 16000 | 0.623 0.0472 | 249.0 | 56,000 7at
756 | 17000 | 0.796 0060s | 2535 | 57,000 798
00 | 18000 } 1.000 0.073 | 2580 | 58,000 845
ss | 19000 | 1.28 0.0971 | 2625 | 59,000 901
820 | 20000 | 1.61 0.1208 | 267.0 | 60,000 959
934 | 21,000 | 1.03 o1a8 271.3. | 61,000 10.20
978 | 22000 | 218 0.180 2758 | 62000 10.84
1023 | 23000 | 258 0217 280.2 | 63,000 1182
106.8- | 24,000 | 303 0.260 28.5 | 64,000 1222
11.2 | 25000 | 3.63 0.308 209.0 | 65,000 1296
1156 | 26,000 | 409 0.364 293.6 | 66,000 1373
1200 | 27,000 | 4.71 0.426 208.0 | 67,000 1454
1245 | 28000 | 5.29 0.495 3028 | 68,000 15.38
1200 | 29000 | 6.14 0572 307.0 | 69,000 16.26
133.5 | 30000 | 697 0.658 3116 | 70,000 17.19
1380 | 31,000 |} 7.68 0.753 3160 | 71,000 18.15
1423 | 32000 | 8.98 0.887 3200 | 72,000 19.16
1468 | 33,000 | 9.98 og7t 326.0 | 73,000 20.22
151.2 | 34000 | 1138 1.095 32,0 | 74,000 21.32
1657 | 35000 | 1260° | 123 333.8 | 75,000 22.47
160.0 | 36000 | 13.03 138 338.0 | 76,000 23.66
1645 | 37,000 | 1680 153 312.8 | 77,000 2ao1
162.0 | 38000 | 17.20 170 347.0 | 78,000 26.22
173.5 | 39,000 | 19.06 1.89 351.5 .| 79,000 22.58
1780 | 40,000 | 21.08 2.08 358.0 "| 80,000 2899
Note: KN converted to Ib are within 0.1 percent of Ib shown.
Source: Reproduced from Thickness Design—Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets,
‘Manual Series No. 1, The Asphalt Institute, College Park, Md., September 1981DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS 797
—
Table 18.4 Distribution of Trucks on Different Classes of U.S. Highways
Percent Trucks
Truck Class | interstate Rural | Other. Rurat Al Rural All Urban | All Systems
Average | Range | Average | Range | Average | Range | Average | Range | Averege| Range
Single-unit trucks
2axle, d-tire 39 |17-64| 58 |40-80) 47 j2366/ 61 |33-04| 49 | 26-67
axle, 6-tire to | 55) 11 [4-18] 10 | 416] 19 | 426] 11 | 6-20
Seaxle or more 2 fra} 4a fre] 2 [ra] 3 far] 3 fas
Allsingle-units | 81 [30-71] 73 |so-08] so [36-77] 77 |55-04/ 63 |a6-e1
Multiple-unit trucks
Seale a fenz | oor fers 1 | 3 1 fea} oa Jere
4-axle s |r] 3 fre} 4 | to] 4 fars} 4 | vt0
S-axle ormore’ | 43 |24-59/ 23 | e40| 36 |16-87| 18 | 5-37] 32 |15-56
All multiple-units] 49 |31-71] 27 |13-50] 41 |23-66] 23 | 644 37 | 20-67
All trucks 100 100 100 100 100
‘Note: Compiled from data supplied by the Highway Statistics Division, Federal Highway
Administration,
‘Including full-trailer combinations in some states.
Souree: Reproduced from Thickness Design—Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets,
Manual Series No. 1, The Asphalt Institute, College Park, Md,, September 1981. *
highway departments. These are usually based on traffic volume counts over
several years. It is also advisable to determine annual growth rates separately for
trucks and passenger vehicles since these may be significantly different in some
cases. The overall growth rate in the United States is between 3 percent and 5
percent per year, although growth rates of up to 10 percent per year.have been
suggested for some interstate highways. Table 18.6 shows growth factors for
different growth rates and design periods, which can be used to determine the
total ESAL over the design period.
The portion of the total ESAL acting on the design lane is used in the
determination of pavement thickness. Either lane of a 2-lane highway can be
considered as the design lane, whereas for multilane highways, the outside lane is
considered. The identification of the design lane is important because in some
cases more trucks will travel in one direction than in the other or trucks may
travel heavily loaded in one direction and empty in the other direction. Thus, it
is necessary to determine the relevant proportion of trucks oni the design lane.798 DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVENIENTS
Table 18.5 Distribution of Truck Factors on Different Classes of U.S. Highways
Truck Factors
Rural Systems Urban Systeme A Systems
T
Interstate Rural Other Rural ‘All Rural Al Urban
‘Average | Range | Average | Range
Range | Averoge ‘Average | Range
Single-unit trucks
Zarle Ate | 0.02 001-006 | 002 |0.01-009] a03" |0.02-0.08 | 0.03" | 001-005 | 002 | 001-007
Pante,tire | 0.19 J0.13-030] 021 |or4038]020 fo-oa1}o2s |ose-042| 021 |015-0:32
sonigormore | 086 |o0e-155] 073 Jastrsr|osr foz1s0|103 |oszrs0| 072 |aze150
Asing-wnis | 007 [002-016] aor [oo2ns7] oor {o00-018]002 | o0¢021 | o07 |ao2037
a
_ ast foaonee | 047 Jozoe|oa [oss-aso loa forsio2| oe |ose-a76
dante 0.62 | 0.40-1.07 | 0.83 | 0.44-1.55 | 0.70 0.37-1.34 | 0.89 0.60-1.64 | 0.73 043-132"
‘S-axle or more” 0.94 Jaert.16 0.98 | 0.58-1.70 | 0.95 0.58-1.64 | 1.02 0.69-1,69 | 0.95 | 0.63-1.53
All muttipleunits | 0.93 |0.67-198} 0.97 |0.67-1.80}09% |as6-1.43 {1.00 [0.721.588 | 0.96 | 0.71-1.30
All trucks 049 }0:38-077| 031 Jo200s2}042 |o20-067}030 | 015-059] 0.40 | 027-069
‘Note: Compiled from data supplied by the Highway Stati
Administration.
"Including full-trailer combinations in some states.
‘**For values to be used when the number of heavy trucks is low, see original source.
Source: Reproduced from Thickness Design—Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets,
Manual Series No. 1, The Asphalt Institute, College Park, Md., September 1981
Division, Federal Highway
When data are not available to make this determination, percentages given in
Table 18.7 can be used. The procedure for determining thé design ESAL is
demonstrated in Examples 18-1 and 18-2,
a
Example 18-1 Computing Accumulated Equivalent Single-Axle Load for a
: Proposed 8-Lane Highway Using Load Equivalency Factors
An 8-lane divided highway is to be constructed on a new alignment. Traffic
volume forecasts indicate that the average annual daily traffic (AADT) in both
directions during the first year of operation will be 12,000, with the following
vehicle mix and axle loads. .
Passenger cars (1000 Ib/axle) = 50 percent
2-axle single-unit trucks (5000 Ib/axle) = 33 percent
3-axle single-unit trucks (7000 Ib/axle) = 17 percentDESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS 799
—
Table 18.6 Growth Factors _ 3!
i ‘Anoual Growth Rate, Percent)
Period,
; No
: yeast) | gi, | 2 4 5 6 7 8 10
1 10 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 1 | so | 10
2 20 | 202 | 204 | 205 | 200 | 207 | 208
3 30 | 306 | ai | ais | 313 | a2 | 325
4 40} a2 | 425 | ast | aay | ae | ar
5 80 | s20 | saz | sss | see | 7s | 587
6 so | 631 | 66s | 60 | os] 715 | 724
7 70 | 743 | 790°} a1 | aso | aes | ase
8 go | ase | 21 | oss | 900 | 1025 | 1064
9 90 | 975 | 1088 | 1103 | 1140 | 1198 | 1240
10 yoo | 1095 | 1201 | 1288 | sate | i282 | 1449
n 110 | 1217 | 1349 | rear | 97 | 1578 | 1065
2 120 | 1941 | 1503 | 1502 | 1687 | 1709 | 1098
8 130 | ta6e | 1663 | 1771 | 1988 | 2014 | 21.80
14 140 | 1597 | 1223 | 1916 | 2101 | 2255 | 2421
15 150 | 17.29 | 2002 | 2188 | 2za2e | 2519 | 2715
16 160 | 1864 | 2162. | 2366 | 2567 | 2709 | 2032
7 120 | 2001 | 2370 | 2584 | 2021 | soe | 2375
18 sao | 2a1|. 2565 |. 2813 | sao | a400 | 3745
19 190 | ze4 | 267 | 3058 | 3376 | 2738
2 zo | 2430 | 2078 | 3308.| 3670 | 21.00
25 260 | 3203, | 4165 | 4773°| S96 | 0325
20 soo | 4057 | 608 | coca | 7906 | e446 18449
35 | 350 | 4a90 | 73.65 | 9032 | unnaa | 13024 zn02
Note: Factor = [(1 +1)"— I]/r, where r = and is not zero. If annual growth is zero, growth
factor = design period.
Source: Reproduced from Thickness Design—Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets,
Manual Series No. 1, The Asphalt Institute, College Park, Md., September 1981.
The vehicle mix is expected to remain the same throughout the design life of the
pavement. If the expected annual traffic growth rate is 4 percent for all vehicles,
determine the design ESAL, given a design period of 20 years.
~ A general equation for the accumulated ESAL for cach category of axle load
is obtained as
ESAL, = fy x Gy x AADT, x 365 N, x Fei
where
ESAL, = equivalent accumulated 18,000 Ib (80 KN) single-axle load for the
“axle category i
Su = design lane factor
G;, = growth factor for a given growth rate j and design period ¢
AADT, = first year annual average daily traffic for axle category
N, = number of axles on each vehicle in category i
Fe, = load equivalency factor for axle category i800
DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS
— oe
Table 18.7 Percentage of Total Trick Traffit’ oh Design Lane
Number of Percentage of
Traffic Lanes Tracks in
(Two Directions) Design Lane
2 30
4 45 (35-48)*
6 or more 40 (25-48)*
*Probable range:
Source: Adapted from Thickness Design—Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets, Manual
Series No. 1, The Asphalt Institute, College Park, Md., September 1981
The following data apply.
Growth factor = 29.78 (from Table 18.6) Oe
Percent truck volume on design lan: (assumed, from Table 18.7)
Load equivalency factors (from Table 18.3)
Passenger cars (1000 Ib/axle) = 0.00002:
2-axle single-unit trucks (5000 Ib/axle)
3-axle single-unit trucks (7000 Ib/axle)
Number of equivalent accumulated axle loads in the design lane
Passenger cars = 0.45 x 29.78 x 12,000 x 0.5 x 365 x 2 x 0.00002
= 0.001 x 10°
2-axle single-unit trucks = 0.45 x 29.78 x 12,000 x 0.33 x 365 x 2
x 0.00500 = 0.1937 x 10°
3-axle single-unit trucks = 0.45,x 29.78 x 12,000 x 0.17 x 365 x 3
x 0.0196 = 0.5867 x 108”
Thus,
total ESAL = 0.781 x 10°
It can be seen that the contribution of passenger cars to the ESAL is negligible.
Passenger cars are therefore omitted when computing ESAL values. This example
illustrates the conversion of axle loads to ESAL, using axle load equivalency
factors.
Example 18-2 Computing Accumulated Equivalent Single-Axle Load for a
Proposed 2-Lane Highway Using Truck Factors
This projected vehicle mix for a proposed 2-lane rural highway during its first
year of operation is given below. If the first-year AADT will be 3000, the annualDESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS 801
growth rate is 5 percent, and the design period is 20 yr, determine the accumu-
lated ESAL, using the truck factors given in Table 18.5.
Passenger cars = 66 percent
Single-unit trucks
2-axle, 4-tire = 18 percent
2-axle, 6-tire = 8 percent
3-axle or more = 4 percent
Tractor semitrailers and combination
3 axle = 3 percent
4 axle = 1 percent
Since the axle loads are not given, the truck factor is used to compute the respec-
tive ESALs.
A general equation for accumulated ESAL for each category of truck is
obtained as
ESAL, = AADT, x 365 x f; x Gs x fa
and the accumulated ESAL for all categories of axle loads is
ESAL = 3 [ESAL]
a
where
ESAL, = equivalent accumulated 18,000 Ib axle load for truck category i
AADT, = first year annual average daily traffic for vehicles in, truck
category i
fr= truck factor for vehicles in truck category i
G, = growth factor for a given growth rate j and design period ¢
fy = design lane factor
ESAL = equivalent accumulated 18,000 Ib axle loads for all vehicles
n = number of truck categories
The solution of this problem is given in Table 18.8, which also demonstrates a
tabular format for determining ESAL. Passenger vehicles are not considered in
the calculations since their contribution to the ESAL is negligible.
The use of load equivalency factors for facilities such as residential streets,
parkways, and parking lots, where the traffic is primarily automobiles with only
occasional trucks, will result in low ESALs and therefore thin pavements that
may not be capable of withstanding the occasional heavy traffic or environmental802
DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS
Table 18.8 Tabular Solution of Examplé 18-2
Growth Factor
for 5%
Number of Truck Annual Growth
Vehicles Factor Rate
During (trom (from ESAL
ist year Table 18.5) Table 18.6) (1*2x3)
Vehicle Type 1 2 3 4
Single Unit Trucks -
2axle, 4 tire 98,550 0.02 33.06 65,161
2axle, 6 tire * 43,800 0.21 33.06 304,086
3 axle or more 21,900 0.73 33.06 528,530
Tractor Semitrailers
and Combinations
3axle 16,425 0.47 33.06 255,215
4axle 5,475 0.83 33.06 150,233
Total 1,303,225
Note: Passenger vehicles are not considered here because their effect is negligible. Values
under column | are obtained from the first year AADT and the design lane factor of 0.5.
For example, for 2 axle, 6 tire single-unit trucks, the number of vehicles during first
year = 3000 x 365 x 0.08 x 0.5 = 43,800.
effects. Thus, a reasonably accurate estimate of the occasional truck traffic for
residential streets and parking lots should be made and included in the determina-
tion of the design ESAL. In cases where this is not possible, the minimum pave-
ment thickness recommended by the Asphalt Institute should be used.'? When it
can’be ascertained that the heavy truck representation on parkways restricted to
automobiles and buses is less than 2 percent of the total traffic, Asphalt Institute
suggests that the design ESAL may be obtained by ‘multiplying the total traffic by
the truck factor of 0.06.'*
‘Subgrade Engineering Properties. As stated earlier, the subgrade consists of
either the natural soil or soil that has been imported to form an embankment.
This borrowed soil may be in its natural state or may be improved by stabiliza-
tion. Stabilization of the natural soil existing on the alignment is not usually done,
except when it is found that the material in its natural state cannot support heavy
construction equipment. Stabilization of in situ subgrade material is therefore
usually carried out to provide an adequate support platform for heavy construc-
tion equipment and is not considered in the design of the pavement.
‘The main engincering property required for the subgrade is its resilient mod-
ulus, which gives the resilient characteristic of the soil when it is repeatedly loaded
with an axial load. It is determined in the laboratory by loading specially pre-
pared samples of the soil with a deviator stress of fixed magnitude, frequency, and
load duration while the specimen is triaxially loaded in a triaxial chamber. The
method of conducting this test is described in detail in the Asphalt Institute’s SoilsDESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS 803
Manual for the Design of Asphalt Pavement Structures.'* To facilitate the use
of the more direct CBR and Hveem Stabilometer tests described in Chapter
15, the Asphalt Institute has determined conversion factors that can be used
~ to convert the CBR and R values to the resilient modulus values. These are given.
as
M,(MP,) = 10.342 CBR
M,(\bjin.2) = 1500 CBR
or
M,(MP,) = 7.963 + 3.826 (R value)
M,(Ib/in.2) = 1155 + 555 (R value)
where M, is the equivalent resilient modulus.
The above conversion factors should be used only for materials that can be
classified under the unified classification system as CL, CH, ML, SC, SM, and SP
or when the resilient modulus is less than 30,000 Ib/in, For materials with higher
values, direct measurement is recommended. '*
‘Subbase and Base Engineering Properties. The material used for subbase or
base courses must meet certain requirements, which are given in terms of the
CBR, liquid limit, PI, particle size distribution (maximum percentage passing the
No. 200 sieve), and minimum sand equivalent. The sand equivalent test is a rapid
field test that shows the relative proportions of fine dust or claylike material in
soils-or graded aggregates. A detailed description of this test is given in Soils
Manual for the Design of Asphalt Pavement Structures.” Table 18.9 gives the
requirements for those engineering properties for soils that can be used as base or
subbase in this method.
Table 18.9 Untreated Aggregate Base and Subbase Quality Requirements
Test Requirements
Test Subbase Base
CBR, minimum 20 80
or
R value, minimum 35 B
Liquid limit, maximum 25 25
Plasticity index, maximum, or 6 NP
Sand equivalent, minimum 25 35
Passing No. 200 sieve, maximum 12 7
Source: Adapted from Thickness Design—Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets, Manual
Series No. 1, The Asphalt Institute, College Park, Md., September 1981804
DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS
Step 2: Surface and Base Materials. The designer is free to select either an
asphalt concrete surface or an emillsified asphalt surface, along with an asphalt
concrete base, an emulsified asphalt base, or an untreated aggregate base and
subbase for the underlying layers. This, of course, will depend on the material
that is economically available. .
However, the Asphalt Institute recommends certain grades of asphalt cement
that should be used for different temperature conditions, as shown in Table 18.10.
The grade of asphalt used should be selected primarily on the basis of its ability
to satisfactorily coat the aggregates at the given temperatures.
Step 3: Minimum Thickness Requirements. The minimum thickness required
for the design ESAL and the type of surface, base, and subbase selected is ob-
tained by using the computer program DAMA or by entering the appropriate
table or chart with the design ESAL and M, of the subgrade and selecting the
required minimum thickness, as demonstrated for different types of pavements in
the following sections.
Full-Depth Asphalt Concrete. Pavements of this type use asphalt mixtures
for all courses above the subgrade. The minimum thickness is determined from
Figure 18.5 by extracting the pavement thickness for the design ESAL and
subgrade M, both of which were determined in step 1. The procedure for deter-
mining the minimum depth required for this type of pavement is illustrated in
Example 18-3.
Table 18.10 «Recommended Asphalt Grades for Different Temperature Conditions
Temperature Condition Asphalt Grades*
Cold, mean annual air temperature ACS, » AC-10
10" 130 5
‘Asphalt concrete, or Type I emulsified asphalt mix with a surface treatment, may be used over
Type II or Type III emulsified asphalt base courses.
Source: Adapted from Thickness Design—Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets, Manual
Series No. 1, The Asphalt Institute, College Park, Md., September 1981.- 908
—
Figure 18.5 Design Chart for Full-Depth Asphalt
*%
Subgrade Resilient Modulus, M, (tbyin.2)
o eee NO a ee agsee es TE NO? “ee
a ae Tt OF
Equivalent 18,000 tb Single Axle Load
Source: Reproduced from Thickness Design—Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets, Manual Series No. 1, The Asphalt Institute,
College Park, Md., September 1981.
SLNAW3Avd 3181XF14 40 NOISIG———
Figure 18.6 Design Chart for Emulsified Asphalt Mix Type |
5M, (Ib/in,
oe
Subgrade Resilient Modul
ao avant
o
oe ee eo
Source: Reproduced from Thickness
College Park, Md., September 1981.
rT
sue Te sg!
Equivalent 18,000 tb Single-Axie Load
Design—Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets, Manual Series No. 1, The Asphalt Institute,
pee Te ge pee
SLNAW3AVd 3181x314 40 NOISIA
408Figure 18.7 Design Chart for Emulsified Asphalt Mix Type II (
1
eee ee
Subgrade Resilient Modulus, Mf, (b/in.2)
x
or Te eg 8 Pe a ee 878 SOF ees eT age
+, Equivalent 18,000 tb Single-Axle Load
Source: Reproduced from Thickness Design—Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets, Manual Series No. 1, The Asphalt Institute,
College Park, Md., September 1981.
808
SLNAW3Avd 3191x973 JO NOISIG‘igure 18.8 Design Chart for Emulsified Asphalt Mix Type III
Perrre |
t Modulus, Mf, (bin?
' =
Subgrade Re
ee oe
ee CT
: Equivalent 18,000 Ib Single-Axle Load
Source: Reproduced from Thickness Design —Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets, Manual Series No.t, the Asphalt Institute,
College Park, Md., September 1981. oe
4
a ET) pu 8 87 eae
SLN3W3AVd 3181x314 40 NDISIG
608810
DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS.
obtained from Table 18.11. This depth should not be less than the recommended
minimum. Figures 18.6 through 18.8 give design charts for minimum depths of
types I, II, and IH emulsified asphalt bases. These charts were developed based on
a 6 month curing period. The procedure for the design of this type of pavement
is illustrated in Example 18-4.
Example 18-4 Designing a Pavement Consisting of Asphalt Concrete
Surface and Emulsified Asphalt Base
Design a suitable pavement to carry a design ESAL of 1,303,225 on a subgrade
havin SS resiJient modulus of 15,000 Ib/in.?.
a. Determine the thicknesses for the surface and base courses for a pavement
consisting of-an asphaltic concrete surface and type II emulsified asphalt
base.
b. Repeat (a) for type III emulsified asphalt base.
Solution for a,
ESAL = 1,303,225
M, = 15,000 Ibjin2
Minimum asphalt concrete surface depth = 3 in. (from Table 18.11)
Total thickness (surface and base) = 10 in. (from Figure 18.7)
Base thickness = (10 — 3) in. = 7 in.
Solution for b,
Minimum asphalt concrete surface depth = 3 in. (from Table 18.11)
Total pavement thickness = 13 in. (from Figure 18.8) :
Base thickness = 10 in.
Asphalt Concrete Surface and Untreated Aggregate Base. These pavements
consist of a layer of asphalt concrete over untreated aggregate base and subbase
courses. As stated earlier, it is not always necessary to use a subbase course.
Figures 18.9 through 18.14 give design charts for determining the thicknesses of
asphalt concrete surfaces for different pavements constructed of asphalt concrete
and untreated aggregates. These charts are given for different base thicknesses
and are based on the quality requirements for base and subbase materials given
in Table 18.9. The Asphalt Institute also recommends that the base course be not
less than 6 in. Table 18.12 also gives the minimum recommended thicknesses for
the asphalt concrete surface over the untreated aggregate base. These values
depend on the design ESAL. In using the design charts, minimum thicknesses
should not be extrapolated into higher traffic regions. The procedure for carrying
out this design is illustrated in Example 18-5,Design Chart for Pavements
Asphalt Concrete Surface and Untreated Aggregate Base 4 in. Thick
int Modulus, Mf, (bin?
ee eS Oe CT ee
Equivalent 18,000 tb Single-Axle Load
SUT 8 aor Pe eT BOF
Source: Reproduced from Thickness Design—Asphalt Pavements for Highways and ‘Streets, Manual Series No. 1, The Asphalt Institute,
College Park, Md., September 1981.
SLNAW3Avd 3781X314 JO NOIS3G
Liszis
——
Figure 18.10 Design Chart for Pavements with Asphalt Concrete Surface and Untreated Aggregate Base 6 in. Thick
peieeead ooo
‘Subgrade Resilient Modulus, M, (Ib/in.2)
a rr CT) rs
suey nage CT Pe eT 8 OF
Equivalent 18,000 Ib Single-Axle Load
Source: Reproduced from Thickness Design—Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets, Manual Series No. 1, The Asphalt Institute,
College Park, Md., September 1981
SLNAW3AVd 3191x914 40 NOISIAFigure 18.11 Design Chart for Pavements with Asphalt Concrete Surface and Untreated Aggregate Base 8 in. Thick
‘Subgrade Resilient Modulus, M,
w
1 ee oases esta ene e sig Teo a Pe 5 eT oF
Equivalent 18,000 lb Single-Axle Load .
Source: Reproduced from Thickness Design—Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets, Manual Series No. 1, The Asphalt Institute,
College Park, Md., September 1981
SLNIW3AVd 371X314 40 NOISIG
1svis
Figure 18.12 Design Chart for Pavements with Asphalt Concrete Surface and Untreated Aggregate Base 10 in. Thick
pe eeee
Subgrade Resilient Modulus, M, (Ib/in.2)
a ee
E
wo
ca Po PE ge
sauna sot rr Pe TE MO pu 5 87 MOE
Equivalent 18,000 tb Single-Axle Load
Source: Reproduced from Thickness Design—Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets, Manual Series No. 1, The Asphalt Institute,
College Park, Md., September 1981.
Z
SLN3W3AVd 3781x374 40 NOISIGFigure 18.13 Design Chart for Pavements with Asphalt Concrete Surface and Untreated Aggregate Base 1
SLNAW3AVd 3781Xa 14 40 NOISIG
Thick
ee
Subgrade Resilient Modulus, M, (Ib/in.2)
ere. |
We ees e296 Ota ca ee 8 3108 pes eT EO peer
lent 18,000 tb Singie-Axle Load
Source: Reproduced from Thickness Design—Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets, Manual Series No. 1, The Asphalt Institute,
College Park, Md., September 1981. |
ae eo
SLs91s
Figure 18.14 Design Chart for Pavements with Asphalt Concrete Surface and Untreated Aggregate Base 18 in. Thick
aw oval
snt Modulus, M, (Ib/i
"e eg eae Tn oe RT pede S67 EOF
Equivalent 18,000 tb Single-Axle Load
Source: Reproduced from Thickness Design—Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets, Manual Series No. 1, The Asphalt Institute,
College Park, Md., September 1981.
SLNAWAAVd 3791x214 4O NOISIA
] —DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS 817
Table 18.12 Minimum Thickness of Asphalt Concrete over Untreated Aggregate Base
Minimum Thickness of
Traffic ESAL Traffic Condition Asphalt Concrete
10" Light traffic parking 75 mm (3.0 in.) *
lots, driveways, and
light traffic rural roads
10* but less than 10° Medium truck traffic 100 mm (4.0 in.)
10 Medium to heavy truck traffic 125 mm (5.0 in.)
or greater
“For full-depth asphalt concrete or emulsified asphalt pavements, a minimum thickness of
100 mm (4 in.) applies in this traffic region, as shown on the design charts. |
Source: Adapted from Thickness Design—Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets, Manual |
Series No. 1, The Asphalt Institute, College Park, Md., September 1981
Example 18-5 Designing a Pavement Consisting of Asphalt Concrete
Surface and Untreated Aggregate Base
Design a suitable pavement to carry the design ESAL of Example 18-4 on a
subgrade having a resilient modulus of 15,000 Ib/in.2, with the pavement con-
structed of an asphalt concrete surface and a 6 in. untreated granular base course.
The minimum depth of the asphalt concrete surface is obtained from Figure
18.10 as 6in. The design will therefore consist of 6 in. of asphalt concrete surface
plus 6 in. of untreated granular base course
Analternative design can be made with a 12 in. base. The depth of the asphalt
concrete surface required for this is 5 in. as obtained from Figure 18.13. Since the
minimum requirement for the depth of the base material is 6 in., the pavement
may consist of 5 in. of asphalt concrete surface, 6 in. of untreated aggregate base
course, and 6 in. of untreated aggregate subbase course.