Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shinji KATSURA
KRI, Inc.
Shimogyo-ku, Kyoto 600-8813, Japan
Email: katsura@!kri-inc. iI,
Shin-ichi KAWAMATA
Formerly Graduate Student, Osaka Prefecture University
Sakai-shi, Osaka 599-8531, Japan
...................
................... 11’
Ba
...................
..........p..i;.,
...4.............
The ultimate strength of stiffened plate:
P, = Ppf or Pf
(4)
I
I
I
JDa , & 1 -
From these results, limit state failure conditions are given for the
I buckling and ultimate strength of stiffened plates of the structure
lf lfdraft in the following forms, where the assigned panel labeling is
shown in Fig. 2:
Fig. 1 A pontoon-type very large floating structure (VLFS).
(2- 1)
B, = 1 + 1,’ + ?le, 1, = a/(nr, )-,
ye =&jX, r e =4(wqmax+80J/ze 9
~o=Wi9 Pe =Mqmax/OYZer
/
Wq,,, = 5qbp4/(384EI,)9 M,,, = 4bpa2/89
Effective moment of inertia le is estimated effective width bpeof Fig. 3 Dimension of stiffened plate.
the plate under compressive and shearing stresses in the (1) For the ultimate collapse of stiffened plates 1 in deck parts
following form. under compression
bpe/bp= @U (2-2)
gC/c =P,(t,,ay)-Aaw,, 5 0
(5- 1)
( 2 ) For the ultimate collapse of stiffened plates 2 in bottom parts
under compression and lateral pressure:
- 194 -
n = i f 8 in bulkhead panels at the corner parts
Zw = Xwmax coS(x/4) : shear stress at x = 1 / 8 in
bulkhead panels at the comer parts
From limit state conditions defined as Eqs. (5-1) to ( 5 - 3 , the
failure probability and reliability index for each limit state is
given as in the following.
II
tttttttttt
I
19
@
.................
..................
Longitudinal
stiffener
I \ Transverse girder
Since the
<, in Eqs.(5 -1) to (5-5) is generally nonlinear
for random vanables, reliability index fi and/or
Analyzed area
A. Target structure
Fig. 4 Stiffened plate subjected to combined loads.
Using the above-mentioned methods, numerical studies for a
5,000m-class VLFS whose rough arrangement and numerical
(3) For the ultimate collapse of stiffened plates 3 in bulkhead data are shown in Figures 1 and 2 and Table 1 are camed out,
parts under pure shear: and the characteristics of reliability levels are investigated under
gus =Ps(tp,gy)-AprWmax 20 (5-3) extreme wave loads.
For simplicity, the bending rigidity D and section modulus 23 of
(4) For the ultimate collapse of stiffened plates 4 in the bulkhead the structure are assumed to be approximately calculated by
comer parts under combined loads with bending moment and below equations.
shear force:
(5-4)
( 5 ) For the ultimate collapse of stiffened plates 5 in the bottom
comer parts under combined loads with compression, shear
stress and lateral pressure:
g, (tPd7Y, r w 1- Auw 2 0
= Gq Table 1 Numerical data of a 5,000m-class VLFS.
(5-5)
Here, P,,Pcq,P,, P,,, and Pcsqare obtained by using equation
(4) as follows: Length L 5,000m
BxDxd 1,000m x 5m x 2m
Bulkhead space Bbh 10,15,20m
Characteristic wave
number kp = ( P ~ / D ) ’ ’ ~ (calculated by Eq. (9))
Bending rigidity D=EZ/B, (calculated by Eq. (9))
(6-3) Linear density pA 2.00 x IO’ kg/m
Section modulus Z, (calculated by Eq. (9))
- 195 -
The ultimate collapse strengths calculated from proposed
equation are compared with those obtained by non-linear finite
element method using shell elements in Fig 5.
6
Fig. 5 shows the comparison between the ultimate collapse -8- Bbh=lOm
strength obtained by FEM and simplified estimation method for 6.0 -
stiffened plates under compressive and shear stresses and lateral
pressure. Moreover, the effective width is considered for the 5.0 -
estimation of ultimate strength of stiffened plate under
compressive and shear stresses, which is evaluated by results p.O -
(refer to Eq.(3-2)).
It is seen from these figures that these results are in 3.0-
comparatively good correspondence.
2.0 -
0.0 -
-1 .ot
-2.01 I
Acknowledgement
B. Reliability Analysis Results for Various Panels under The authors are very grateful to the Japan Society for the
Short-term Sea-states Promotion of Science for the financial support as Research
In this section, reliability analysis results for various limit state Project, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Scientific
conditions of stiffened plates in the structure. Research (B)(2)).
In Fig. 6, relations between reliability indexes j3 for various cases
References
are shown under significant wave height H, =3.7m.
Effects of bulkhead space Bbh on the reliability index for the case [13 National Maritime Research Institute: Proceedings, 4th Int.
of tp=20mm are investigated under various combined loads in Workshop on VLFS (VLFS'03 (Tokyo), 2003.
this figure. It is seen from this figure that all reliability indexes
for various panels are decreasing with increasing Bbh, the [2] Proceedings (CD-ROM), ISOPE2004 (Toulon), 2004.
reliability index for the ultimate collapse of deck under [3] Proceedings (CD-ROM), OMAE2004 (Vancouver), 2004.
compression and bottom panels under compression and lateral [4] Okada, H. and et al.: A study on structural design of
pressure is smallest for the cases of &,=lo and 15m. On the Pontoon-Type VLFS based on collapse behavior and reliability
other hand, the reliability index for the ultimate collapse of analysis, Proceedings, OMAE'04(Vancouver), Paper No.
bulkhead panels under pure shear is smallest for the case of OMAE2004-51459 (CD-ROM), pp. 1-9,2004.
&=20 m.
[ 5 ] Fukuoka, T., Miyajima, S., Sato, C., Ohta, M.: Assessment of
structural safety and functionality of a floating air port model,
IV. Conclusions Proceedings, VLFS'O3 (Tokyo), pp.193-199,2003.
- 196 -