Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I would also like to thank my parents, family and my friends for constantly
encouraging me during the course of this project, which I could not have
completed without their support and continuous encouragements.
AKSHIT SHARMA
2
INDEX
1. Introduction 4
2. History of ILO 4
➢ Early Years 6
➢ Going Global 7
3. Aim & Objective of ILO 9
4. How ILO works? 12
5. India And ILO 14
6. Limitations 15
7. Conclusion 16
8. Bibliography 17
3
INTRODUCTION
HISTORY OF ILO
The Organization has played a role at key historical junctures – the Great
Depression, decolonization, the creation of Solidarność in Poland, the victory
over apartheid in South Africa – and today in the building of an ethical and
productive framework for a fair globalization.
It was created in 1919, as part of the Treaty of Versailles that ended World War
I, to reflect the belief that universal and lasting peace can be accomplished only
if it is based on social justice.1
4
The following are the principles which gave birth to the ILO and these following
principles were incorporated in Part –XIII of the Treaty of Versailles-
To achieve these objectives and to implement these principles the peace treaty
prescribed that a permanent organisation be established and thus ILO came into
existence in the year 1919.
The Constitution of the ILO was drafted in early 1919 by the Labour
Commission, chaired by Samuel Gompers, head of the American Federation of
Labour (AFL) in the United States. It was composed of representatives from nine
countries: Belgium, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, France, Italy, Japan, Poland, the
United Kingdom and the United States. The process resulted in a tripartite
organization, the only one of its kind, bringing together representatives of
governments, employers and workers in its executive bodies.
The driving forces for the ILO's creation arose from security, humanitarian,
political and economic considerations. The founders of the ILO recognized the
importance of social justice in securing peace, against a background of the
exploitation of workers in the industrializing nations of that time. There was also
increasing understanding of the world's economic interdependence and the need
for cooperation to obtain similarity of working conditions in countries competing
for markets.
5
Reflecting these ideas, the Preamble of the ILO Constitution states:
EARLY YEARS
The ILO moved to Geneva in the summer of 1920, with France's Albert
Thomas as its first Director. Nine International Labour Conventions and 10
Recommendations were adopted in less than two years. These standards covered
key issues, including:
• hours of work ,
• unemployment ,
• maternity protection ,
• night work for women ,
• minimum age , and
6
• night work for young persons .
A Committee of Experts was set up in 1926 to supervise the application of ILO
standards. The Committee, which still exists today, is composed of independent
jurists responsible for examining government reports and presenting each year to
the Conference its own report on the implementation of ILO Conventions and
Recommendations. The Great Depression, with its resulting massive
unemployment, soon confronted Britain's Harold Butler , who succeeded Albert
Thomas as Director in 1932.
Realizing that handling labour issues also requires international cooperation, the
United States became a Member of the ILO in 1934, although it continued
to stay out of the League of Nations.
The American, John Winant , took over as head of the ILO in 1939 - just as the
Second World War was imminent. He moved the ILO's headquarters temporarily
to Montreal, Canada, in May 1940 for reasons of safety.3
His successor, Ireland's Edward Phelan, had helped to write the 1919
Constitution and played an important role once again during the Philadelphia
meeting of the International Labour Conference, in the midst of the Second World
War.
GOING GLOBAL
7
In 1946, the ILO became a specialized agency of the newly formed United
Nations.
The ILO established the Geneva-based International Institute for Labour Studies
in 1960 and the International Training Centre in Turin in 1965. The Organization
won the Nobel Peace Prize on its 50th anniversary in 1969.
Belgium's Michel Hansenne succeeded him in 1989 and guided the ILO into the
post-Cold War period, emphasizing the importance of placing social justice at the
heart of international economic and social policies. He also set the ILO on a
course of decentralization of activities and resources away from the Geneva
headquarters.
Under Somavia, the ILO established the World Commission on the Social
Dimension of Globalization, which published a major report responding to the
needs of people as they cope with the unprecedented changes that globalization
has brought to societies.
8
In May 2012, Guy Ryder (UK) was elected as the tenth Director-General of the
ILO. He was re-elected to his second five-year term in November 2016. Ryder
has emphasised that the future of work is not predetermined: Decent work for all
is possible but societies have to make it happen. It is precisely with this imperative
that the ILO established its Global Commission on the Future of Work as part of
its initiative to mark its centenary in 2019.
A broad idea of the aims and purposes of the ILO can be understood from the text
of the Peace Treaty of 1919. It provided that ILO is being established for 'the
well-being, physical and intellectual of industrial wage-earners'. This was being
done not as a matter of charity to labour but as a matter of 'supreme international
importance'. However, it was recognised that 'differences of climate, habits and
customs of economic opportunity and industrial tradition, make strict uniformity
in the conditions of labour difficult of immediate attainment...that labour should
not be regarded merely as an article of commerce...'. Thus, from international
point of view the welfare of the wage-earners is the principal aim of the ILO.
The objectives of the ILO are clearly enumerated in the Preamble of its
Constitution supplemented by Article. 427 of the Peace Treaty of Versailles
which has been further supplemented by the Philadelphia Declaration of 1944.
Following are the conditions for improvement the Preamble declares to be
urgently required in various particulars:
• the protection of the worker against sickness, disease and injury arising out
of his employment;
9
• protection of the interests of workers when employed in countries other
than their own;
From the very beginning the ILO, therefore, has been confronted with the
tremendous task of promoting social justice by improving conditions of work and
life, in all parts of the world. In its own words, it was given a sweeping mandate
in the field of social and labour action. 5
The utility of the ILO as a vehicle for social action and economic reforms was
greatly felt during the dark eyes of the World War II. The ILO has been so useful
to all of the three elements composing it--government, employers and workers--
that there is an almost unanimous desire for it to continue in existence. The ILO
is almost the only League of Nations instrumentality about which it can almost
be said'. A Conference convened in Philadelphia on April 20, 1944 marked the
beginning of a new era in the history of the ILO. The delegations of forty-one
States met together to consider the future role, policy and programmes of the ILO.
Out of the deliberations of the Conference emerged a document on the re-
definition of the ILO's aims and purposes and a wider conception of its
responsibilities. This was the Declaration of Philadelphia of 1944 which has been
incorporated into the ILO's Constitution. Article. 1 of the Declaration affirmed
the fundamental principles on which the Organisation is based and in particular,
that:
10
2. Freedom of expression and of association are essential to sustained
progress;
Article. III sets forth ten specific objectives which the ILO is to further and
promote among the nations of the world:
2. the employment of workers in the occupations in which they can have the
satisfaction of giving the fullest measure of their skill and attainments and
make their greatest contribution to the common well-being;
3. The provision, as a means to the attainment of this end and under adequate
guarantees for all concerned, of facilities for training and the transfer of
labour, including migration for employment and settlement;
11
6. The extension of social security measures to provide a basic income to all
in need of such protection and comprehensive medical care;
7. Adequate protection for the life and health of workers in all occupations;
The ILO is the global body responsible for drawing up and overseeing
international labour standards and for ensuring that these standards are
respected in practice and principle. The 187 member States of the ILO meet at
the International Labour Conference in June of each year. Employer and
worker delegates freely express themselves and vote according to instructions
received from their organizations. They sometimes vote against each other or
even against their government representatives. The Conference establishes and
adopts international labour standards and is a forum for discussion of key
social and labour questions. It also adopts the Organization's budget and elects
the Governing Body.
The very structure of the ILO, where workers and employers together have an
equal voice with governments in its deliberations, shows social dialogue in
action. It ensures that the views of the social partners are closely reflected in
ILO labour standards, policies and programmes.
12
between trade unions and employers in formulating, and where appropriate,
implementing national policy on social, economic, and many other issues.6
MAIN BODIES
The ILO accomplishes its work through three main bodies which comprise
governments', employers' and workers' representatives:
13
• Regional meetings of the ILO member States are held periodically to
examine matters of special interest to the regions concerned.8
India became the member of the I.L.O in the year 1919 which is from its
inception. Though India had was not won independence by that year i.e. 1919, it
was admitted to the membership of the I.L.O. However its membership, of the
League of Nations and the I.L.O had not gone unchallenged.
For it was argued that it would give an additional vote to the United Kingdom.
The British Government gave an assurance that British India was democratically
administered and upon this India along with China, Iran, Japan and Thailand were
few Asian countries to be admitted to the I.L.O membership of the 24 States. Out
of 40 States represented, India was one which sent a full delegation to the first
session of the International Labour Conference held in the year 1919 at
Washington.9
The ILO and India have common aims, goals and destiny, for, both of them are
committed to world peace freedom and social justice. Both are striving for the
socio-economic betterment of the long suffering, long forgotten people, the
14
people who are underprivileged and under nourished with the fullest realization
that any further delay would fatal for themselves and the whole world.10
LIMITATIONS
The ILO like other international institutions has a limited field of activity
delineated by its 'objects'. It differs from States as a subject of international law
in as much as in case of the ILO the problems of sovereignty and jurisdiction
cannot be similar to that of States. Any function outside its constitution lies within
the powers of the State. As the International Court of Justice has observed
referring to the United Nations: "Whereas a State possesses the totality of
international rights and duties recognised by international law, the rights and
duties of an entity such as the Organisation must depend upon its purposes and
functions as specified or implied in its constituent documents and developed in
practice."
Thus no international body including the ILO can over-step its constitutional
powers. For instance, the ILO cannot legally exercise the peace enforcement
functions of the United Nations Security Council or vice versa. Article. 39 of the
Constitution of the ILO confers on it international legal personality and in
particular he capacity to contract, to acquire and dispose of immovable and
movable property; and to institute legal proceedings. Article. 40 grants such
privileges and immunities to Director-General and other officers as are necessary
for the independent exercise of their functions in connection with the ILO.
Member States are legally bound to recognise such personality.
15
CONCLUSION
16
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS REFERRED-
STATUTORY READINGS-
WEBSITES REFERRED-
1. https://www.who.int/workforcealliance/members_partners/member_list/ilo/en/
2. https://www.britannica.com/topic/International-Labour-Organization
3. https://in.one.un.org/who-we-are/ilo-india/
4. https://www.un.org/youthenvoy/2013/08/ilo-international-labour-organization/
5. https://www.unwater.org/institution/international-labour-office/
6. https://www.thenational.ae/uae/a-history-of-the-international-labour-organization-
1.492268
7. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/1969/labour/history/
8. https://www.ilo.org/global/lang--en/index.htm
17