Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Despite the various initiatives undertaken by the government over the past
few years, the transport sector remains very inefficient. The reason for this
sorry state of affairs eventually boils down to policies that inhibit completion
are found at the state and union territory level. In contrast several countries
have a single ministry of transport, covering all the modes of transport. Since
this would be difficult in a large country like India, a permanent forum for
all these modes of transport come together to learn from, and respond to, the
1
Although there is a large private-sector involvement in transportation in
role, and is also the major service provider in ease of certain sub-sectors.
This leads to ‘conflicts of interest’, as brought in the cases aviation, ports, and
railways.
India, we need to consider if all competition issues in the transport sector can
to debtors.
receive against loans, and the capacity of the concern to pay interest to
It helps investors to assess the long term and short term financial
2
Tax liability of business enterprise to know whether it follows rules and
problem.
The study has used secondary data. The secondary data collected for
3
1.6 TOOLS AND ANALYSIS
The collected data were classified into suitable ratios for analysis and
1. The data taken for analysis covers a period of five years i.e., from
2004-05 to 2008-09. So the study is about the past only, it need not to
whole.
3. As the study is mainly based on the quantitative data obtained from the
4
1.8 CHAPTER SCHEME
study.
observations.
5
CHAPTER – II
of Austin Car in India. In 1955, the company entered into an agreement with
Leyland Motors, UK, to manufacture Leyland vehicles and changed its name
to Ashok Leyland Ltd. The Hinduja Group and IVECO, Italy (a subsidiary of
Leyland. Since July 2006 Hinduja Group is 100% holder of LRLIH. The
heavy-duty vehicles in India today. And the company is also into manufacture
6
Ashok Leyland gives lot of thrust to new range of Intermediate
commercial vehicles, which fall between the light and heavy ranges of
production of the 709 and 909 models has commenced under the first phase of
company planned to further expand and modernize capacities over the next
four years, for which is raised Rs. 436 or through a GDR issue in 1995.
fitted with an all wheel drive under one deal signed recently. The company
has supplied specially developed light recovery vehicles (LRVs) to the Indian
Army. The company has also pioneered buses running on CNG fuel in India
7
India. The assets of TVS coach, which owns two bus body building factories
in TN will be transferred to the new IV company Irizar TVS in which all the
support from Dana crop US and Arvinmeritor, US. The gear box proposed to
medium and heavy duty commercial vehicle application to permit both the
ISO 14001 certification for all vehicle manufacturing units in 2002. It has
also become the first Indian auto company to receive the latest ISO/TS 16949
upgraded versions of 5 and 6 speed gear boxes and this will be offered for
8
infrastructure at its manufacturing units and marketing offices. The new
6-speed synchromesh gear box and this was introduced during 2003-04 in the
company’s products. The company has set up its centralized R & D facility
has subscribed Rs. 7 crores to the equity capital of ATSL and shares were
allotted during November 2004 which represent 70% of the paid up capital of
ATSL, thus making it a subsidiary of Ashok Leyland Ltd. with effect from
Transport Services Ltd. (ATSL) has come down to 40% during February
tradition to the first with technology. Be it full air brakes, power steering or
rear engine busses, Ashok Leyland Ltd. pioneered all these concepts.
company made its vehicles strong, over-engineering them with extra metallic
9
muscles. “Designing durable products that make economic sense to the
the company, which in turn has moulded consumer attitudes and the brand
personality.
Ashok Leyland Ltd. vehicles have built a reputation for reliability and
independent India. In the population Indian metros, four out of the five state
transport undertakings (STU) buses come from Ashok Leyland Ltd. Some of
them like the double-ducker and vestibule buses are unique models from
Holdings Limited (LRLIH) was taken over by a joint venture between the
Hinduja Group, the Non-Resident Indian transactional group and IVECO. The
blue prepared for the future reflected the global ambitions of the company,
captured in four words: Global standards, Global Markets. This was at a time
when liberalization and globalization were not yet in the air. Ashok Leyland
10
sell its Ductron Castings unit at Hyderabad as a ‘going concern’ to Ennore
Foundries Ltd for a consideration of Rs.620 Million and this sale would be
effective from April 1, 2005, The company has also subdivided its equity
share face value from Rs.10/- per share to Re.1/- per share with effect from
2004.
vehicles and Ferrous castings by 17500 Nos and 7500 Tonnes respectively
commercial vehicles and Ferrous castings has increased to 67500 Nos and
24000 Tonnes respectively. The company has promoted M/s. Gulf Ashley
Motor Ltd. jointly with M/s. Gulf Oil Corporation Ltd. to consolidate and
improve the company’s market share and customer reach in the Eastern
Region of India.
The company has planned to launch 260hp rear engine intercity coach
during 2005-06. Further the company has also planned to launch newgen
series of trucks in 2005-06. During the year 2005-06, the company has
increased its installed capacity of commercial vehicles by 9700 Nos. with this
77200 Nos.
11
In 2006-07, Ashok Leyland has entered the knowledge business space
engineering and aerospace sectors and the company has also entered into a
U.A.E. to put up a plant for building bus bodies in the U.A.E. Ashok Leyland
acquired the Truck Business Unit of AVIA a.s. in Prague, Czech Republic in
October 2006. During the year 2007 Ashok Leyland noticed a share purchase
USA to acquire the entire equity capital for a consideration of $17 million and
the company has pierced into a Joint Venture with the Alteams Group,
Ashok Leyland has announced its entry into the pre-owned commercial
vehicles market with Altrux would be marketed through TVS & Sons Ltd. in
AG, Germany, have signed an harmony for a joint venture to propose, grow
and settle in infotronics products and services for the transportation sector.
12
Ashok Leyland and Nissan Motor, Japan comes under an agreement for
Hinduja group flagship Ashok Leyland has developed the country's first
on May 2008, the company made the legal formation of the three JV
companies for the Light Commercial Vehicle (LCV) business in India for
development. Such three companies are Ashok Leyland Nissan Vehicles Pvt.
Ltd, Nissan Ashok Leyland Power train Pvt Ltd and Nissan Ashok Leyland
(CV) business by investing close to Rs 6,000 cr in the next few years for
attain the leadership quality in the same field. The company's production
13
CHAPTER – III
A. Profitability
of the business are carried on. Poor operational performance may indicate
poor sales and hence poor profits. A lower profitability may arise due to the
lack of control over the expenses. Banker’s financial institutions and other
creditors look at the profitability ratios as an indicator whether or not the firm
earns substantially more than it pays interest for the use of borrowed funds
and whether the ultimate repayment of their debt appears reasonably certain.
Owners are interested to know the profitability as it indicates the return which
they can get on their investments. The following are the important
profitability ratios.
14
i) Gross Margin Ratio
Sometimes referred to as the gross profit ratio, this measures the profit
margin over sales. The gross profit is a result of the ‘mark-up’ on the cost of
regular mark-up on all goods sold, the gross profit margin on sales should be
Gross profit
Gross margin = Sales
x 100
Table 3.1
Percentage of Gross margin ratio
(in Percentage)
Gross margin
Year Gross profit Sales
ratio
2004-2005 382.91 3440.57 11.12
2005-2006 464.22 4247.65 11.12
2006-2007 578.31 5329.81 11.12
2007-2008 755.08 7320.37 10.31
2008-2009 815.51 7922.02 10.29
Mean 10.84
CV 12.70
CAGR 27.04
15
INTERPRETATION
It is evident from the table that the Gross margin of Ashok Leyland Ltd
It decreased from Rs. 11.12 crores to 10.29 crores. The mean value of gross
margin of Ashok Leyland Ltd during the study period is Rs. 10.84 crores. The
16
Chart 3.1
Percentage of Gross margin ratio
11
Gross margin ratio (%)
10.8
10.6
10.2
10
9.8
2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
Year
17
ii). Percentage of Net profit ratio
planning. The rate of net profit on sales indicates the efficiency with which
performance.
Table 3.2
Percentage of Net profit ratio
(in Percentage)
Net profit after Net profit
Year Sales
Tax ratio
2004-2005 196.61 3440.57 5.7
2005-2006 250.42 4247.65 5.89
2006-2007 302.47 5329.81 5.89
2007-2008 425.77 7320.37 5.89
2008-2009 450.76 7922.02 5.89
Mean 6
CV 16.4
CAGR 4.3
Source: Computed from Annual accounts of Ashok Leyland
INTERPRETATION
18
It is observed from the table that the percentage of Net profit of Ashok
Leyland Ltd registered an increasing trend during the study period (2004-05
to 2008-09). It increased from the 5.7% to 5.89%. The mean value of net
profit of Ashok Leyland Ltd during the study period is Rs. 6 crores. The
analysis of CV is 16.4. The Net profit of Ashok Leyland Ltd showed positive
19
Chart 3.2
5.95
5.85
Net profit ratio (%)
5.8
5.75
5.7
5.7
5.65
5.6
2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
Year
20
iii) Return on capital employed
Operating profit
= Capital employed
X100
Table 3.3
Return on Capital employed
(in Percentage)
Return on
Operating Capital
Year capital
profit employed
employed
2004-2005 442.32 1525.47 28.99
2005-2006 494.62 2023.69 24.44
2006-2007 618.96 2080.44 29.75
2007-2008 783.92 2512.02 31.21
2008-2009 891.82 3014.1 29.59
Mean 28.80
CV 8.91
CAGR 2.04
Source: Computed from Annual accounts of Ashok Leyland
21
INTERPRETATION
Leyland Ltd registered on decreasing trend during the study period (2007-08
Ashok Leyland Ltd showed positive compound annual growth rate is 2.04.
22
Chart 3.3
Return on Capital employed
35
31.21
28.99 29.75 29.59
30
Return on capital employed (%)
24.44
25
20
15
10
0
2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
Year
23
iv) Return on share holds fund
Table 3.4
(in Percentage)
Return on
Profit after Shareholders
Year shareholders
Tax fund
fund
2004-2005 196.61 1051.8 18.69
2005-2006 250.42 1167.87 21.44
2006-2007 302.47 1412.45 21.41
2007-2008 425.77 1894.57 22.47
2008-2009 450.76 2148.98 20.97
Mean 21.00
CV 6.68
CAGR 12.21
Source: Computed from Annual accounts of Ashok Leyland
24
INTERPRETATION
Leyland Ltd. Registered an decreasing trend during the study period (2007-08
return on shareholders fund of Ashok Leyland Ltd. during the study period is
12.21%.
25
Chart 3.4
25
22.47
21.44 21.41 20.97
Return on shareholders fund (%)
20 18.69
15
10
0
2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
Year
26
v) Return on total assets
total assets.
EBIT
Return on total assets = Total Assets
Table 3.5
Return on Total Assets
(Rs. in crores)
Total Return on
Year EBIT
Assets total Assets
2004-2005 345.87 1550.7 0.22
2005-2006 385.41 2048.28 0.18
2006-2007 492.95 2104.38 0.23
2007-2008 633.35 2534.97 0.25
2008-2009 714.46 3036.48 0.23
Mean 0.23
CV 10.28
CAGR 5.49
Source: Computed from Annual accounts of Ashok Leyland
27
INTERPRETATION
It is evident from the table that the return on total assets at Ashok
Leyland Ltd., registered an decreasing trend during the study period (2007-08
to 2008-09). It decreased from Rs. 0.25 crores to Rs. 0.23 crores. The mean
value of return on total assets of Ashok Leyland Ltd. during the study period
is Rs. 0.23 crores. The analysis of C.V. is 10.28. The return on total assets of
Ashok Leyland Ltd. showed positive compound annual growth rate is 5.49.
28
Chart 3.5
Return on Total Assets
0.3
Return on total Assets (Rs. in crores)
0.25
0.25 0.23 0.23
0.22
0.2 0.18
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
Year
29
vi) Earning per share Ratio
widely published ratio calculated from a firms financial statements. The ratio
Table 3.6
Earning per share
(Rs. in crores)
Profit after tax
Number of
Earning
Year & preference ordinary
per share
dividend shares
2004-2005 193.58 118.93 1.63
2005-2006 271.41 118.93 2.28
2006-2007 327.32 122.16 2.68
2007-2008 441.29 132.39 3.33
2008-2009 469.31 133.03 3.53
Mean 2.69
CV 28.86
CAGR 116.74
Source: Computed from Annual accounts of Ashok Leyland
INTERPRETATION
30
It indicates the percentage of earning per share of Ashok Leyland Ltd.
increased from 3.33 to 3.53. The mean value at percentage of earning per
share of Ashok Leyland Ltd. during the study period is Rs. 269 crores. The
31
Chart 3.6
Percentage of earning per share
4
3.53
3.5 3.33
Earning per share (Rs. in crores)
3
2.68
2.5 2.28
2
1.63
1.5
0.5
0
2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
Year
32
B) SOLVENCY RATIO
business smoothly and meet its obligations, both short-term as well as long
The following are the important long term and short-term solvency
ratios.
33
i) Current Ratio
liabilities. This ratio is used to indicate the capacity of business to meet short-
Current Assets
Current ratio = Current Liabilitie s
Table 3.7
Current Ratio
(Rs. in crores)
Current Current
Year Current Ratio
Asset Liabilities
2004-2005 1463.67 832.7 1.76
2005-2006 2157.27 1165.67 1.85
2006-2007 2232.41 1408.52 1.58
2007-2008 2697.71 1755.85 1.53
2008-2009 2875.71 2271.94 1.26
Mean 1.60
CV 14.11
CAGR -27.99
Source: Computed from Annual accounts of Ashok Leyland
INTERPRETATION
34
The table 3.7 it shows that the current ratio of Ashok Leyland Ltd.
It decreased from Rs. 158 crores to Rs. 1.26 crores. The mean value of current
ratio of Ashok Leyland Ltd. during the study period is Rs. 1.60. The analysis
35
Chart 3.7
Current Ratio
2
1.85
1.8 1.76
1.58 1.53
Current Ratio (Rs. in crores)
1.6
1.4
1.26
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
Year
36
ii) Liquid ratio
This ratio is also known as the quick (or) acid test ratio. It is calculated
by deducting stock from current assets and bank overdraft from currently
liabilities. Stock is the least liquid of current assets and the ability of the
business to pay off current debts without relying on the sales of stock is
important. The liquid ratio will provide a measure of the firm’s ability to meet
Table 3.8
Liquid Ratio
(Rs. in crores)
Current
Current
Year Liabilities – Liquid Ratio
Asset – Stock
Overdraft
2004-2005 956.73 832.7 1.15
2005-2006 1589.19 1165.67 1.36
2006-2007 1329.85 1408.52 0.94
2007-2008 1627.39 1755.85 0.93
2008-2009 1651.35 2271.94 0.73
Mean 1.02
CV 23.71
CAGR -36.74
Source: Computed from Annual accounts of Ashok Leyland
37
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the table 3.8 that the liquid ratio of Ashok Leyland
Ltd. registered an decreasing trend during the study period (2005-06 to 2008-
09). It decreased from Rs. 1.36 crores to 0.73 crores. The mean value of
liquid ratio of Ashok Leyland Ltd. during the study period is 1.02 crores. The
analysis of C.V. is 23.71. The liquid ratio of Ashok Leyland Ltd. showed
38
Chart 3.8
Liquid Ratio
1.6
1.36
1.4
Liquid Ratio (Rs. in crores)
1.2 1.15
1 0.94 0.93
0.8 0.73
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
Year
39
LONG-TERM SOLVENCY
to shareholder’s funds.
Table 3.9
Debt equity ratio
(Rs. in crores)
Long term Debt equity
Year Equity
debts ratio
2004-2005 498.9 118.93 4.19
2005-2006 880.41 118.93 7.40
2006-2007 691.93 122.16 5.66
2007-2008 640.4 132.39 4.83
2008-2009 887.5 133.03 6.67
Mean 5.75
CV 22.72
CAGR 59.04
Source: Computed from Annual accounts of Ashok Leyland
40
INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that the debt equity ratio of Ashok Leyland
Ltd. registered an increasing trend during the study period (2007-08 to 2008-
09). It increased from Rs. 4.83 crores to 6.67 crores. The mean value of debt-
equity during the study period is Rs. 5.75 crores. The analysis of C.V. is
41
Chart 3.9
Debt equity ratio
8.00 7.40
6.67
7.00
Debt equity ratio (Rs. in crores)
5.66
6.00
4.83
5.00
4.19
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
Year
42
ii) Proprietory ratio
Table 3.10
Proprietory ratio
(Rs. in crores)
Long term Proprietory
Year Total assets
funds ratio
2004-2005 1051.8 1550.7 0.68
2005-2006 1167.87 2048.28 0.57
2006-2007 1412.45 2104.38 0.67
2007-2008 1894.57 2534.97 0.75
2008-2009 2148.98 3036.48 0.71
Mean 0.67
CV 9.75
CAGR 4.34
Source: Computed from Annual accounts of Ashok Leyland
43
INTERPRETATION
The table 3.10 shows that the proprietory ratio of Ashok Leyland Ltd.
increased from Rs. 0.67 crores to Rs. 0.71 crores. The mean value of
propritory ratio of Ashok Leyland Ltd. during the study period is Rs. 0.67
crores. The analysis of C.V. is 9.75. The proprietory ratio of Ashok Leyland
44
Chart 3.10
Proprietory ratio
0.8 0.75
0.71
0.68 0.67
0.7
Proprietory ratio (Rs. in crores)
0.57
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
Year
45
iii) Fixed interest coverage
The ratio is very important from the lender’s point of view. It indicates
whether the business would earn sufficient profits to pay periodically the
interest charges. The higher the number, the more secure the lender is in
Table 3.11
Percentage of fixed interest coverage
(Rs. in crores)
Before Int. & Fixed Fixed interest
Year
Tax interest coverage ratio
2004-2005 345.87 59341 5.82
2005-2006 385.41 30.4 12.68
2006-2007 492.95 40.65 12.13
2007-2008 633.35 28.84 21.96
2008-2009 714.46 76.31 9.36
Mean 12.39
CV 12.46
CAGR 61.05
Source: Computed from Annual accounts of Ashok Leyland
INTERPRETATION
46
It indicates that the fixed interest coverage of Ashok Leyland Ltd
It decreased from Rs. 21.06 crores to Rs. 9.36 crores. The mean value of fixed
interest coverage of Ashok Leyland Ltd during the study period is Rs. 12.39
crores. The analysis of C.V. is 48.48. The fixed interest coverage of Ashok
respectively.
47
Chart 3.11
Percentage of fixed interest coverage
25
21.96
Fixed interest coverage ratio (Rs. in
20
15
crores)
12.68 12.13
9.36
10
5.82
5
0
2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
Year
48
C) WORKING CAPITAL PERFORMANCE
This is also termed as gross working capital. It refers to the firm’s total
current or circulating assets. Current assets are those assets that are usually
converted into cash within an accounting year. Thus, they are cash or near-
(i) It is the excess of current assets over current liabilities. This is, as
performance ratios.
49
i) Percentage of current asset to total assets
Current assets to total assets measure the gross working capital per
rupee at capital employed. This ratio indicates the proportion of current asset
to total assets.
Current Asset
Current asset to total asset = Total asset
x 100
Table 3.12
Percentage of current asset to total assets
(In percentage)
Current asset to
Year Current asset Total Asset
total asset
2004-2005 1463.67 1550.7 94.38
2005-2006 2157.27 2048.28 105.32
2006-2007 2232.41 2104.38 106.08
2007-2008 2697.71 2534.97 106.41
2008-2009 2375.71 3036.48 94.70
Mean 101.38
CV 6.17
CAGR 0.34
Source: Computed from Annual accounts of Ashok Leyland
50
INTERPRETATION
It observed from the table that the percentage of current asset to total
asset of Ashok Leyland Ltd registered an decreasing trend during the study
mean value of percentage of current assets to total assets during the study
period is Rs. 101.38 crores. The analysis of C.V. is 6.17. The percentage of
current asset to total asset of Ashok Leyland Ltd showed positive compound
51
Table 3.12
Percentage of current asset to total assets
104.00
102.00
100.00
98.00
96.00 94.70
94.38
94.00
92.00
90.00
88.00
2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
Year
52
ii) Percentage of current asset to fixed asset
It indicates the relationship between the current assets and fixed assets
of the company. This ratio will differ from industry to industry and therefore,
Current Assets
Current asset to fixed assets = Fixed Assets
x 100
Table 3.13
Percentage of current asset to fixed assets
(In Percentage)
Current asset to
Year Current asset Fixed assets
fixed asset
2004-2005 1463.67 874.83 167.31
2005-2006 2157.27 893.84 241.35
2006-2007 2232.41 943.27 236.67
2007-2008 2697.71 1307.04 206.40
2008-2009 2375.71 1525.55 188.50
Mean 208.05
CV 15.15
CAGR 12.67
Source: Computed from Annual accounts of Ashok Leyland
53
INTERPRETATION
It is evident from the table that the percentage of current asset to fixed
asset of Ashok Leyland Ltd registered an decreasing trend during the study
mean value of percentage of current assets to fixed assets during the study
period is Rs. 208.05 crores. The analysis of C.V. is 15.15. The current asset
54
Chart 3.13
Percentage of current asset to fixed assets
241.35 236.67
250.00
206.40
188.50
Current asset to fixed asset (%)
200.00
167.31
150.00
100.00
50.00
0.00
2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
Year
55
iii) Inventory Turnover Ratio
This ratio measures the speed with which business can sell its average
stock level. The calculation is made by dividing the cost of goods sold by the
average stock levels held. This higher the result, the shorter the time stock is
held awaiting sale. As a substitute, total sales can be instead of the cost of
goods sold.
Table 3.14
Inventory turnover ratio
(Rs. in times)
Cost of goods Inventory
Year Average stock
sold turnover ratio
2004-2005 3057.66 458.7 6.67
2005-2006 3783.43 537.51 7.04
2006-2007 4751.5 735.32 6.46
2007-2008 6565.29 986.44 6.65
2008-2009 7106.51 1147.11 6.19
Mean 6.61
CV 4.67
CAGR -7.06
Source: Computed from Annual accounts of Ashok Leyland
INTERPRETATION
56
The table 3.14 shows that the inventory turnover ratio of Ashok
Leyland asset of Ashok Leyland Ltd registered an decreasing trend during the
study period (2007-08 to 2008-09). It decreased from the Rs. 6.65 crores to
Rs. 6.19 crores. The mean value of inventory turnover ratio of Ashok
Leyland Ltd during the study period is Rs. 6.61 crores. The analysis of C.V. is
4.67. If the table shows the negative compound annual growth rate is -7.06
respectively.
57
Chart 3.14
Inventory turnover ratio
7.2
7.04
7
Inventory turnover ratio (in times)
6.8
6.67 6.65
6.6
6.46
6.4
6.19
6.2
5.8
5.6
2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
Year
58
iv) Receivables Turnover Ratio
This ratio refers to the time it takes an average days credit sales to be
collected. This is calculated by dividing the net sales revenue by the average
the right balance between increasing sales through the offer of credit terms to
customers, and the time taken for debtors to pay, while debts are uncollected,
Table 3.15
Receivables turnover ratio
(Rs. in times)
Average
Net sales Receivables
Year receivables
revenue turnover
balance
2004-2005 3440.54 405.62 8.48
2005-2006 4247.65 458.77 9.26
2006-2007 5329.81 424.34 12.56
2007-2008 7320.37 522.88 14.01
2008-2009 7922.02 375.84 21.07
Mean 13.08
CV 38.40
CAGR 148.50
Source: Computed from Annual accounts of Ashok Leyland
59
INTERPRETATION
It is evident from the table that the receivable turnover ratio of Ashok
Leyland Ltd registered an increasing trend during the year (2007-08 to 2008-
09). It increased from the Rs. 14.01 crores to Rs. 21.07 crores. The mean
value of receivable turnover ratio of Ashok Leyland Ltd during the study
period is Rs. 13.08 crores. The analysis of C.V. is 38.40. The receivable
60
Table 3.15
Receivables turnover ratio
25
21.07
Receivables turnover (in times)
20
14.01
15 12.56
9.26
10 8.48
0
2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
Year
61
v) Working capital turnover ratio
making sales. In case a company can achieve higher volume of sales with
Net Sales
= Working Capital
Table 3.16
Working capital turnover ratio
(Rs. in times)
Working Working capital
Year Sales
capital turnover ratio
2004-2005 3440.54 630.87 5.45
2005-2006 4247.65 991.6 4.28
2006-2007 5329.81 823.89 6.47
2007-2008 7320.37 941.86 7.77
2008-2009 7922.02 603.32 13.13
Mean 7.42
CV 46.36
CAGR 140.81
Source: Computed from Annual accounts of Ashok Leyland
INTERPRETATION
62
It is observed from the table that the working capital turnover ratio of
Ashok Leyland Ltd registered as increasing trend during the year (2007-08 to
2008-09). It increased from the Rs. 7.77 crores to Rs. 13.13 crores. The mean
value of working capital turnover ratio of Ashok Leyland Ltd during the study
period is Rs. 7.42 crores. The analysis of C.V. is 46.36. The working capital
63
Chart 3.16
Working capital turnover ratio
13.13
14
Working capital turnover ratio (in times)
12
10
7.77
8 6.47
5.45
6 4.28
0
2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
Year
64
vi) Cash turnover ratio
Higher the turnover loss will be cash required for a given level of sales and
other things remaining constant which implies greater efficiency. This ratio
Sales
Cash turnover ratio = Cash
Table 3.17
Cash turnover ratio
(Rs. in times)
Cash turnover
Year Sales Cash
ratio
2004-2005 3440.54 324.98 10.59
2005-2006 4247.65 796.68 5.33
2006-2007 5329.81 602.87 8.34
2007-2008 7320.37 434.94 16.83
2008-2009 7922.02 451.37 17.55
Mean 11.83
CV 44.42
CAGR 65.78
Source: Computed from Annual accounts of Ashok Leyland
INTERPRETATION
65
From the above table 3.17 that the cash turnover ratio of Ashok
Leyland Ltd registered an increasing trend during the study period (2007-08
to 2008-09). It increased from Rs. 16.83 crores to Rs. 17.55 crores. The mean
value of cash turnover ratio of Ashok Leyland Ltd. is Rs. 11.83 crores. The
analysis of C.V. is 44.42. The cash turnover ratio of Ashok Leyland Ltd
66
Chart 3.17
Cash turnover ratio
20
17.55
18 16.83
Cash turnover ratio (in times)
16
14
12 10.59
10
8.34
8
6 5.33
4
2
0
2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
Year
67
Table 3.18
Working capital trend analysis
(Rs. in crores)
Working Capital
Year (X) (X2) XY YC
(y)
2004-2005 630.97 -2 4 -1261.94 819.328
2005-2006 991.60 -1 1 -991.6 808.824
2006-2007 823.89 0 0 0 798.32
2007-2008 941.86 1 1 941.86 787.816
2008-2009 603.32 2 4 1206.64 777.312
N=5 Σ y = 3991.64 Σ x= Σ x2 = Σ xy = 3991.600
0 10 -105.04
YC = a+bx
Σy 3 9 9 .16 4
a = = = 7 9 8.3 2
N 5
Σy − 1 0 .50 4
a = = = − 1 0.5 0 4
Σ x2 10
The estimated working capital of for the year 2009 is 3, 2010 is 4, 2011
is 5.
68
= 798.32 – 42.016= 756.304 lakhs
complete information about the direction of the business. For this purpose of
determining the direction, the trend is calculated. Trend analysis makes it easy
69
Chart 3.18
Working capital trend analysis
1200
1000
800
Trend
600
Working Capital
400
Trend Value
200
0
2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
Year
70
CHAPTER – IV
This is the last section of the study. It is conclude with a short resume
of summary restating the whole performance. It is the most widely read part
presented already and many reader scan the summary which to presented in
the last chapter first to obtain an overview of the problem and to determine
71
4.1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
The gross margin ratio of the company has been shown downward
trend (i.e.) 11.12, 11.12, 11.12, 10.31, 10.29. But in the year 2007-08 it has
reduced to a value below 11. The mean value of the company is Rs. 10.84.
Net profit ratio was at satisfactory trend in the study period 2004-05 to
2008-09 it was not reduced to a value 5.89. The mean 6, the analysis of CV
2004-05 ratio was 28.99%, 2005-06 ratio was 24.44%, 2006-07 ratio was
29.75%, 2007-08 ratio was 31.21% and 2008-09 ratio was 29.59%. The mean
ratio was 18.69%, 2005-06 ratio was 21.44%, 2006-07 ratio was 21.41%,
2007-08 ratio was 22.47%, 2008-09 ratio was 20.97%. The mean value is 21,
72
The return on total assets in our study was fluctuating (i.e.) in 2004-05
ratio was 0.22% 2005-06 ratio was 0.18%, 2006-07 ratio was 0.23%, 2007-08
ratio was 0.25%, 2008-09 ratio was 0.23%. The mean value is Rs.023, the
Earning per share of Ashok Leyland Ltd, was satisfactory level. During
the year 2004-05 to 2008-09. Hence the company earning per share ratio is
good. The mean value is Rs. 269, the analysis of CV 28.86 and CAGR
116.74.
The current ratio of the company has been show satisfactory trend (i.e)
1.76, 1.85, 1.58, 1.53, 1.26). But in the year 2006-07 to 2008-09 it has not
The liquid ratio of the company has been shown the downward trend
(i.e.) 1.15, 1.36, 0.94, 0.93, 0.73). But in the year 2006-07 to 2008-09 it has
73
Debt equity ratio was at satisfactory level upto the study satisfactory
level study period in 2004-05 to 2008-09. The mean value is Rs. 5.75,
2004-05 to 2007-08. But present condition is not satisfactory level. The mean
Fixed interest coverage ratio was found to be increasing trend for study
period 2004-05 to 2007-08. But, during the current year 2008-09 it decreased.
The mean value is Rs. 12.39, the analysis of CV 48.46 and CAGR 61.05.
The position of current asset to total asset was increasing trend. In the
year 2004-05 to 2007-08. But the last year of the study period it decreased
(94.70 percentage). The mean value is Rs. 101.38, the analysis of CG 6.17
The position of current asset to fixed asset in our study was highly
fluctuating (i.e.) in 2004-05 ratio was 167.31% 2005-06 ratio was 241.35%,
2006-07 ratio was 236.67%, 2007-08 ratio was 206.4% and 2008-09 ratio was
188.50%. The mean value is 208.05, the analysis of CV 15.15 and CAGR
12.67.
74
The inventory ratio was at satisfactory level upto the study satisfactory
satisfactory level. The mean value is Rs. 6.61. The analysis of CV is 4.67 and
year 2004-05 ratio was 8.48, 2008-09 ratio was 21.07. The mean value is Rs.
efficient in the study period 2004-05 to 2008-09. Hence the working capital is
properly utilized by the company. The mean value is Rs. 7.42, the analysis of
Cash turnover ratio is found to be increasing trend for the study period
The mean value is Rs. 11.83, the analysis of CV is 44.42 and CAGR is 65.78.
4.2 SUGGESTIONS
75
Based on these findings, the following suitable suggestions are offered
Current ratio of 2:1 is ideal, but it has only 1.26, so company wants to
Quick ratio of 1:1 considered satisfactory, but during the study period,
it has only less than 1. Hence it has to improve the liquidity position.
The relationship between sales and net profit is good. So the company
very good in the year 2008-09. Thus the company must maintain the stability
and profitability.
76
Earning per share in the study period 2004-05 to 2008-09 it was
So in future the earning per of the Ashok Leyland Ltd. So in future the
It concluded that overall position of the Ashok Leyland Ltd, during the
77
4.3 CONCLUSION
investigations such as market surveys, etc., develop, product, keep men and
So, the management with regular intervals, make some analysis about their
concern. Ratio analysis one of the important tools of the financial statement
analysis leads to measure the various financial structure and position of the
South India.
78
The ratio analysis of Ashok Leyland Ltd. provides various information
Leyland Ltd gives the entire result of the comparable figures for the past 5
years. Finally concludes that the financial position of the Ashok Leyland Ltd
79
BIBLIOGRAPHY
REFERENCE BOOKSF
Delhi, 1997.
Publications, Trichy.
WEBSITES
www.google.com
www.transportindustryinindia.com
www.ashokleyland.com
80