‘Tur Ditensions oF Equatery ‘The mot famous definialways challenge my equitable solution. Here are some of the chal Tenge {your cake should have bren shared in accordance withthe ‘tructre ofthe department. The chairpereon sends me a memo tended «thee.course luncheon, which, mysteriously enoug id include desert, Several of them uhougit my chocls ‘the lst course ofthe luncheon. Ph coc no artchhe hear and arent a bent bigger of ny choelareake Tah Ua cps oe im ae allegieto chocolate, And the crucial gene fer ehocolate digestion, sd though it would him no harm so eat my eake, he wouldn't derive any nariton benef rom iether The ‘them very, very smal poss (hey want to be plite and sap -my cake) and give bigger pices tothe who eas truly appre sks Tein mie ite ro ue ess want no par of thes comp re everyone fork, they elPy 6 Tesing they should have some sayin making ur exemplifies the redefinition of equality through ther mbes the question isnot simply who should vote but wt i vote in school board lesions. One view sthatall dl ise education ofthe next generation only those affeted by school ar, ieky question is wha ions wih school ag school-age chive, schools. Peshepe the chikren shouldbega oars oH reset) ontariosocitce with ber] inividualis ideologies, group-based distribution {is ually propomd ara remedy for previous vialatione of merit: oF rank-based distribution In the chocolat ake example, men proposed oven depeive efntion of equity from within hin he largr pool poten toms ean be designed so that meubers ofa disadvantaged sl ergin the sume thing? on diferent Spanish speround” should be the eiterion o svarded, rather Sipperters of scion counter that, ‘yar fom the extraordinary dfficaley of messring need and dnd shift inthe bases of affirmative action would estoy ing race and genand 8 ll focus onthe proces to2 Paver Panaoor ifitrenulted in decision wo tlieved wasinaccord with theevidense* ‘Finally, proces is important because in the polis, isibution: do ope aking eat tor evenbyexsninatons might apie respect forthe syst sfaires, loyalty. Distributive systems nay themeelvesproride ead of arguing aboot who the recipient are or what is being distributed, one can argue about orhether Uh proces of dtr Epuiy st ir Arguments for competition, lteries, elections, bargain. judieation ae al f this nature The AnGuatests FoR BQuatry ‘Been when one it able 10 ea dimensions of a dsrbuto the queion of where one stands. Hove does ne deide wether wo accept a challenge, whic concept of equity to use? Where one sands ot nace of view includes assumptions about the mein re of property assumptions tt transcend the grea debate about5h Poucr PA at do we know whether things are “acquire fairy” sig linge and aye we have fa le woman owned becue her husband's property lement theory woul law. So proponens of bdindependentfrom dine cet, rr simlted by security. B ‘ext for chapters hws themes wil be elaborated in ve hem here because hey all haves reo be considered the Tn the words of one player om scometomesn the between