Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ohp 3 COMPONENTS OF YIELD MANAGEMENT MEASUREMENT
Ohp 3 COMPONENTS OF YIELD MANAGEMENT MEASUREMENT
a. Total rooms × double occupancy rate ( presuming that all the rooms
were sold at the double occupancy rate), or
Note that (b) will be less than (a) but more realistic.
For the following example, assume that the Educational Inn has
300 guestrooms, collects an average of $80 per room,
is currently operating at a 70% average occupancy
offers 100 one-bed and 200 two-bed guestrooms
Any one-bed room sold as a single is priced at $90:
as a double, it sells for $110.
Any two-bed room sold as a single is priced at $100;
as a double it sells for $120.
MOP = No. of rooms occ by more than one person = 105 = 50%
No. of rooms occupied 210
Formula 7: Yield:
= 70% × $ 80 = 56%
$ 100
EXAMPLE:
Case 1 – least number of rooms sold - lowest operating cost - generate the
highest ADR most profitable situation.
Case 3 - highest number of rooms sold - highest operating costs - lowest
ADR. Non-room sales - highest in this case, so likelihood of highest total
revenue (room revenue + non-room revenue).
Case 2 - a middle position in terms of number of rooms sold and ARR,
where, operating costs and total revenue is also likely to be in an
intermediate position.
Formula 9. RevPAR
1. Equivalent Occupancy
CMRw =
For example, suppose a hotel has 400 rooms and has $ 144.75 Potential
Average Room Rate (=$57,900 Potential room revenue).
Suppose the marginal cost per room is $12 and the hotel is operating at
60% occupancy, i.e. 240 rooms are sold per night, and the ARR achieved is
$137.50.
The manager thinks that by lowering rate to $110 the occupancy can be
increased to 75% (300 rooms sold per night) and that 90% occupancy (360
rooms sold) can be achieved by further lowering the rate to$ 91.67.
The room revenue in these 3 cases is same i.e. $ 33,000 and it appears that
all three situations are similar. Let us also consider the factor of $12, the
marginal cost per room and calculate the revenue for the above situations:
It is clear that the reduction of rate to $ 110 would get 60 rooms extra but
the revenue loss will be $ 720. Similarly, a further reduction to $91.67 in
room rate would bring 120 extra rooms, but revenue loss would be $1,439.
To offset this loss of revenue each additional guest shall have to spend $12
on non-room revenue contribution: