Pier Vittorio dureli
4. Niiliam could be seem aa the esence
ofthe history of Western thought from
Greek philowphy onward. ln toe history
‘of che Wetera world, most great con-
ict, dnvents, and diopures developed
hi common frame, which arene
ire time wat the advent of
rmeaphpic he wel made of things
Severino, Bence del Nihinme (Mile
Adelphi, 982), 361-54. OF course there is
tno simple way of applying this rico
within rchivecrore and
och are embedded
ation” and “projec:
ony in
ina wibiistic
‘way, bu alo to be constructively and
cerivially)shepieal of the currently
sabes vahat-fte faith inthe
Hea of change at phenomena likersted
Fron any beng of hing ond evens.
“This ea eth that im architecture and
teres, ca be suesine only th
the demiucgic iconegraphy of agra
After Diagrams
Nothing ever truly disappears.
— Carl Andre
Diagrams, as they have been conceived and used in architec-
ture throughout the last century, have the power to simulta-
neously construct, design, and expose an idea, while at the
same time simplifying and idealizing facts and events of the
world as simple signs. Diagrams are powerful devices but
also problematic ones, in the sense that they are constantly
updating the representation of a work beyond its effectual
truth, and thus reducing it to an ever-changing image, The
diagram, therefore, tends to become an accessible language
that easily absorbs and consumes things and events, a con
sumption of our experience of the world as it exists around
us, Because of its evolutionary nature, to ignore or refuse the
diagram puts one in an impossible position. It is not possible
to totally refuse it, precisely because diagrams are inevitably
also a form of language, but one has to be skeptical and
aware of the way this language is constructed, because itis
very similar to the rhetoric of language itself. Language is
continually exposed to the risk of being the mere camouflage
of reality, which means that we picture the world, as,
Ludwig Wittgenstein said, solely in terms of our “language
games.” But diagrams are not simple camouflages of reality:
they appear today more as a form of value-free nihilism.
Nihilism claims that things are nothing; itis the idea that an
entity can be, at any moment, nothing. Therefore, nihilism
is the deliberate consumption of che being of things and
events." If diagrams — as the rhetoric of today seems to