You are on page 1of 4

The Wife of Bath’s Prologue

From the beginning through the Wife of Bath’s description of her first three husbands Fragment
3, lines 1–451
Summary: The Wife of Bath’s Prologue
The Wife of Bath begins the Prologue to her tale by establishing herself as an
authority on marriage, due to her extensive personal experience with the institution.
Since her first marriage at the tender age of twelve, she has had five husbands. She
says that many people have criticized her for her numerous marriages, most of them
on the basis that Christ went only once to a wedding, at Cana in Galilee. The Wife of
Bath has her own views of Scripture and God’s plan. She says that men can only
guess and interpret what Jesus meant when he told a Samaritan woman that her fifth
husband was not her husband. With or without this bit of Scripture, no man has ever
been able to give her an exact reply when she asks to know how many husbands a
woman may have in her lifetime. God bade us to wax fruitful and multiply, she says,
and that is the text that she wholeheartedly endorses. After all, great Old Testament
figures, like Abraham, Jacob, and Solomon, enjoyed multiple wives at once. She
admits that many great Fathers of the Church have proclaimed the importance of
virginity, such as the Apostle Paul. But, she reasons, even if virginity is important,
someone must be procreating so that virgins can be created. Leave virginity to the
perfect, she says, and let the rest of us use our gifts as best we may—and her gift,
doubtless, is her sexual power. She uses this power as an “instrument” to control her
husbands.
At this point, the Pardoner interrupts. He is planning to marry soon and worries that
his wife will control his body, as the Wife of Bath describes. The Wife of Bath tells
him to have patience and to listen to the whole tale to see if it reveals the truth about
marriage. Of her five husbands, three have been “good” and two have been “bad.”
The first three were good, she admits, mostly because they were rich, old, and
submissive. She laughs to recall the torments that she put these men through and
recounts a typical conversation that she had with her older husbands. She would
accuse her -husband of having an affair, launching into a tirade in which she would
charge him with a bewildering array of accusations. If one of her husbands got
drunk, she would claim he said that every wife is out to destroy her husband. He
would then feel guilty and give her what she wanted. All of this, the Wife of Bath tells
the rest of the pilgrims, was a pack of lies—her husbands never held these opinions,
but she made these claims to give them grief. Worse, she would tease her husbands
in bed, refusing to give them full satisfaction until they promised her money. She
admits proudly to using her verbal and sexual power to bring her husbands to total
submission

This sonnet attempts to define love, by


telling both what it is and is not. In the first
quatrain, the speaker says that love—”the
marriage of true minds”—is perfect and
unchanging; it does not “admit
impediments,” and it does not change
when it find changes in the loved one. In
the second quatrain, the speaker tells
what love is through a metaphor: a
guiding star to lost ships (“wand’ring
barks”) that is not susceptible to storms (it
“looks on tempests and is never shaken”).
In the third quatrain, the speaker again
describes what love is not: it is not
susceptible to time. Though beauty fades
in time as rosy lips and cheeks come
within “his bending sickle’s compass,” love
does not change with hours and weeks:
instead, it “bears it out ev’n to the edge of
doom.” In the couplet, the speaker attests
to his certainty that love is as he says: if
his statements can be proved to be error,
he declares, he must never have written a
word, and no man can ever have been in
love.

The speaker asks his addressee to be quiet, and let him love. If the addressee
cannot hold his tongue, the speaker tells him to criticize him for other shortcomings
(other than his tendency to love): his palsy, his gout, his “five grey hairs,” or his
ruined fortune. He admonishes the addressee to look to his own mind and his own
wealth and to think of his position and copy the other nobles (“Observe his Honour,
or his Grace, / Or the King’s real, or his stamped face / Contemplate.”) The speaker
does not care what the addressee says or does, as long as he lets him love.
The speaker asks rhetorically, “Who’s injured by my love?” He says that his sighs
have not drowned ships, his tears have not flooded land, his colds have not chilled
spring, and the heat of his veins has not added to the list of those killed by the
plague. Soldiers still find wars and lawyers still find litigious men, regardless of the
emotions of the speaker and his lover.
The speaker tells his addressee to “Call us what you will,” for it is love that makes
them so. He says that the addressee can “Call her one, me another fly,” and that
they are also like candles (“tapers”), which burn by feeding upon their own selves
(“and at our own cost die”). In each other, the lovers find the eagle and the dove, and
together (“we two being one”) they illuminate the riddle of the phoenix, for they “die
and rise the same,” just as the phoenix does—though unlike the phoenix, it is love
that slays and resurrects them.
He says that they can die by love if they are not able to live by it, and if their legend
is not fit “for tombs and hearse,” it will be fit for poetry, and “We’ll build in sonnets
pretty rooms.” A well-wrought urn does as much justice to a dead man’s ashes as
does a gigantic tomb; and by the same token, the poems about the speaker and his
lover will cause them to be “canonized,” admitted to the sainthood of love. All those
who hear their story will invoke the lovers, saying that countries, towns, and courts
“beg from above / A pattern of your love!”
Form
The five stanzas of “The Canonization” are metered in iambic lines ranging from
trimeter to pentameter; in each of the nine-line stanzas, the first, third, fourth, and
seventh lines are in pentameter, the second, fifth, sixth, and eighth in tetrameter, and
the ninth in trimeter. (The stress pattern in each stanza is 545544543.) The rhyme
scheme in each stanza is ABBACCCDD.
Commentary
This complicated poem, spoken ostensibly to someone who disapproves of the
speaker’s love affair, is written in the voice of a world-wise, sardonic courtier who is
nevertheless utterly caught up in his love. The poem simultaneously parodies old
notions of love and coins elaborate new ones, eventually concluding that even if the
love affair is impossible in the real world, it can become legendary through poetry,
and the speaker and his lover will be like saints to later generations of lovers. (Hence
the title: “The Canonization” refers to the process by which people are inducted into
the canon of saints).

You might also like