You are on page 1of 1

498 E-Poster | Clinical Report Presentation

intraoral scan performed prior extracting the tooth, so the Switzerland). Bone graft placed over the implant and collagen
esthetic outcome is satisfactory. The clinical significance of the barrier membrane positioned over bone graft. Vertical and hori-
described technique include that the procedure was made in less zontal incisions were sutured to attain primary closure. The final
appointments, the overall treatment time is reduced and the restoration was made after 2 months.
opportunity to regenerate the lost labial bone plate is viable with
Outcomes: Results: Healing was uneventful. The presence of a
better preoperative conditions. The use of guided planning was
complete interproximal papilla around the implant was observed
a key factor in the satisfactory final outcome of the treatment.
in the case. The technique with Papillae-sparing incisions
showed esthetically pleasing implant crown with good soft tissue
contours.
PC415
Conclusion: This case demonstrates a specific incision design
Guided single-implants in the esthetic zone and technique to achieve predictable esthetic outcome. Papillae-
sparing incisions facilitate accessing the bone to place dental
following socket preservation; 5 year follow-up case implants and restore compromised osseous and gingival architec-
series ture. It may be necessary to restore teeth adjacent to a compro-
mised implant site to attain optimal esthetics.
A.Y. Gokbuget, N.A. Kocak, S. Pamuk
Istanbul/Turkey
PC417
Background: Achieving ideal emergence profile and restoration
contours for single implant-supported prosthesis in the esthetic Immediate implant placement in maxillary aesthetic
zone while preserving soft and hard tissue volume in long-term zone with socket shield technique: a case report
is the biggest challenge in implant dentistry. Long-term results
of 5 case using guided-implant surgery following socket preser- N. Bayraktar, B. Aysesek, S. Ersanli, A. Gultekin, M. Aytekin,
vation after tooth extraction were presented. O. Oz
Clinical Procedure: A no flap, in non-viable incisors, atrau- Istanbul/Turkey
matic extractions were carried out in 5 patients (age 32–
60 years). Preservation and sealing of the sockets were per- Background: Immediate implant placement causes resorption
formed with xenograft and free gingival graft from the palatal of surrounding tissues. With the socket shield technique the
side of the patients. Temporary maryland prosthesis were used root is retained to preserve the periodontal ligament and bundle
by patients during healing. After healing period; flapless implant bone. In most procedures, particle grafts and membranes are
placement were performed with teeth supported surgical guide used to support the buccal plate and soft tissue. It has also been
by the same surgeon. Permanent prosthesis were made with cus- suggested that resorption of the buccal bundle bone can be
tom abutments in order to preserve emergence profile. Radio- avoided by leaving a buccal root segment in place(socket shield
graphic controls were done after socket preservation, implant technique). In this case, minimum facial bone resorption is
placement and during 5 year follow-up. expected and volumetric changes are measured by Cone Beam
Computed Tomography (CBCT).
Outcomes: Within the limitations of these case series socket
preservation and guided implant surgery could be considerate as Clinical Procedure: 29 years old male patient was referred to
successful methods in the long-term protection of soft and hard Istanbul University Dentistry Faculty Oral Implantology
tissue around esthetic zone implants. Department due to trauma in anterior maxillary teeth. Teeth
crowns were removed from the horizontally broken teeth.
Implants were placed by preserving the facial bundle bone plate
PC416 through the root segments. After implant placement, the socket
was filled with xenograft. Resorbable collagen membrane and
Hybrid implant placement using papillae-sparing free gingival graft were used to cover the socket during surgery.
incisions in the esthetic zone Patients teeth were used as temporary teeth in essix plaque as
temporary immediate prosthesis. Gingival contour was recon-
M. Gozlu1, S. Ekinci2 structed by screw retained temporary teeth and 2 months after
1 tooth extraction, screw retained e-max ceramic was used for final
Konya/Turkey, 2Istanbul/Turkey
restoration.
Background: The health of the peri-implant tissues play an Outcomes: During postoperative 1 year controls, there was no
important in the long term outcome of dental implants. In the change in gingival contour and bone resorption with CBCT.
esthetic zone it is preferable to avoid elevating papillae because Pink esthetic score was used to evaluate gingival aesthetic.
flap elevation may induce recession and create unesthetic black Implants healed without adverse events. The comparison of
triangles. radiographic images showed physiologic bone remodeling at the
implant shoulders without bone resorption. Volumetric analysis
Clinical Procedure: Material and Methods: A 38-year-old
showed a low degree of contour changes from extraction and
nonsmoking female patient, with no systemic condition, pre-
implant placement to the follow-ups before final restoration.
sented with missing teeth. The interproximal bone level on the
This technique can be used if there is possibility of bone resorp-
adjacent tooth is the most critical bone determinant of papilla
tion with immediate implant placement.
support. No observed bone loss in this area. Papillae-sparing
incisions were made. A horizontal releasing incision across the
edentate ridge at the site of tooth. It terminates 1 mm from the
adjacent teeth. Bilateral vertical releasing incisions on the buccal
aspect that extend obliquely, slanting away from the ends of the
horizontal incision. Hybrid dental implant inserted into the
ridge (4.1 mm 9 11.5 mm) (iRES SAGL, Lugano,

© 2018 The Authors.


© 2018 European Federation of Periodontology

You might also like