Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Regression WeightsCPT Moderating

    Uploaded by

    Prayag Gokhale
    14 views6 pages
    This document reports the results of a regression analysis examining how various demographic factors influence components of prospect theory. It finds that: 1) Age significantly predicts loss aversion, with older individuals exhibiting greater loss aversion. 2) Gender marginally predicts various components, with males exhibiting slightly lower value function, probability weighting, loss aversion, and cumulative prospect theory (CPT) scores. 3) Education marginally predicts value function only, with higher education associated with a higher value function. 4) Income and region had little influence on prospect theory components according to the analysis.

    Original Description:

    CPT

    Original Title

    Regression WeightsCPT moderating

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document reports the results of a regression analysis examining how various demographic factors influence components of prospect theory. It finds that: 1) Age significantly predicts loss aversion, with older individuals exhibiting greater loss aversion. 2) Gender marginally predicts various components, with males exhibiting slightly lower value function, probability weighting, loss aversion, and cumulative prospect theory (CPT) scores. 3) Education marginally predicts value function only, with higher education associated with a higher value function. 4) Income and region had little influence on prospect theory components according to the analysis.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    14 views6 pages

    Regression WeightsCPT Moderating

    Uploaded by

    Prayag Gokhale
    This document reports the results of a regression analysis examining how various demographic factors influence components of prospect theory. It finds that: 1) Age significantly predicts loss aversion, with older individuals exhibiting greater loss aversion. 2) Gender marginally predicts various components, with males exhibiting slightly lower value function, probability weighting, loss aversion, and cumulative prospect theory (CPT) scores. 3) Education marginally predicts value function only, with higher education associated with a higher value function. 4) Income and region had little influence on prospect theory components according to the analysis.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 6

    Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model)

    Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label


    <-- Ag
    Value function -.009 .016 -.598 .550
    - e
    Probability weighting <-- Ag
    e .004 .016 .255 .799
    function -

    <-- Ag -
    Loss aversion e -.037 .015 .010
    - 2.573

    <-- Ag -
    CPT e -.018 .013 .157
    - 1.417
    Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model)

    Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label


    . .
    Value function <--- Gender -.013 -.436
    030 663
    Probability weighting Gender . .
    <--- -.018 -.581
    function 030 561
    Gender . .
    Loss aversion <--- -.019 -.681
    028 496
    Gender . .
    CPT <--- -.016 -.652
    024 514
    Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model)

    Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label


    . .
    Value function <--- Experience .012 .644
    019 520
    Experience . .
    Probability weighting function <--- -.008 -.442
    019 658
    Experience . .
    Loss aversion <--- -.017 -.953
    017 341
    Experience . - .
    CPT <--- -.018
    015 1.212 225
    Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model)

    Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label


    <-- 1.28
    Value function Education .029 .022 .198
    - 6
    Probability weighting <-- Education
    .012 .022 .526 .599
    function -
    <-- Education
    Loss aversion .012 .021 .561 .575
    -
    <-- Education
    CPT -.004 .018 -.198 .843
    -
    Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model)

    Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label


    <-- .
    Value function Income .007 .456 .648
    - 015
    Probability weighting <-- Income .
    -.018 -1.174 .240
    function - 016
    <-- Income .
    Loss aversion .012 .821 .412
    - 014
    <-- Income .
    CPT -.014 -1.171 .242
    - 012
    Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model)

    Estimat
    S.E. C.R. P Label
    e
    <-- .
    Value function Region -.010 .013 -.753
    - 451
    Probability weighting <-- Region .
    -.012 .013 -.949
    function - 343
    <-- Region .
    Loss aversion .017 .012 1.432
    - 152
    <-- Region .
    CPT .004 .010 .359
    - 720

    You might also like