Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SOCIETY FOR
CLASSICAL STUDIES
th
29 Conference and
General Meeting
27th January – 31st January 2008
Department of Classics
University of Canterbury
Christchurch
New Zealand
ASCS 29 Programme and Abstracts
MONDAY, January 28
1:00pm – 2:30pm Lunch Break
1. Shade and Shadows in Virgil’s Supertext 1. Follow the Leader: Justice and Leadership
William J. Dominik (University of Otago) according to Plato and Isocrates
Yair Schlein (The Open University of Israel)
2. Interlocking Word Order in Virgil
Lidnsay Zoch (University of Melboune) 2. Lucian's Zeus Refuted and Cynic tradition
Philip Bosman (University of South Africa)
3. The Significance of Beginnings
Fran Alexis (University of Tasmania) 3. Pythagorean Placita on the Substance of
Sperm, Embryology and Foetal Development
4. Beating Time: Metrical Strategies in the Kristen Szumyn (Macquarie University)
Narratives of Ovid’s Fasti.
Anne Gosling (University of KwaZulu-Natal) 4. What were Celsus’ Fibulae?
John Ratcliffe (University of Queensland)
CANTERBURY 1 OTAGO
Section 7: ANCIENT HISTORIOGRAPHY I Section 8: GREEK MYTHOLOGY
Chair: Edwin Judge (Macquarie University) Chair: Patrick O’Sullivan (University of Canterbury)
1. Comanus of Naucratis and Comanus of 1. Fire and the Monster: the Defeat of Typhoeus
Alexandria Mary Carver (University of Canterbury)
Paul McKechnie (Macquarie University)
2. Livy the Augustan historian (in honour of 2. Between Delos and Delphi Comes Hermes
Edwin Judge) Arlene Allan (University of Otago)
Ronald Ridley (University of Melbourne)
SOUTHLAND MARLBOROUGH
Section 9: MODERN RECEPTION OF CLASSICS
Chair: Tom Stevenson (University of Queensland)
1. Barbarians on the Berlin Wall: A History of the Discipline of ‘Germanic’ Antiquity from the
Fifteenth century to the Present Day
Timothy Scott (Macquarie University)
2. Cornford Mythistoricus
Greg Horsley (University of New England) BOARDROOM
10
ASCS 29 Programme and Abstracts
TUESDAY, January 29
1:00 pm – 2:30pm Lunch Break Conference Foyer
Section 20: SOCRATES, SOPHISTRY AND Section 21: MOTIFS ON GREEK POTTERY
SCEPTICISM II Chair: Diana Burton (Victoria University of
Wellington)
Panel sponsored by the Australasian Society of
Ancient Philosophy 1. Botanic Food Motifs of the Late Bronze Age
Chair: Dirk Baltzly (Monash University) Cycladic Islands
Marcia Nugent (University of Melbourne)
1. The Examined Life: Extracts from a Neo-
Socratic Argument 2. Some Myths in Vase-painting Analysis
Joe Mintoff (University of Newcastle) Anne Mackay (University of Auckland)
1. Augustus: the Perpetual Triumphator 1. A Hawk, Some Doves and an Eagle: Silius
Sarah Midford (University of Melbourne) Italicus, Punica 4.101-42, 445-79
Frances Mills (La Trobe University)
2. Germanicus Caesar and the Senatus
Consultum de Gnaeo Pisone Patre 2. The Rehabilitation of Hercules in Silius Italicus’
Andrew Stiles (University of Sydney) Punica
Matt Matthias (University of Otago)
3. Caracalla’s Parthian War and the Ghost of
Alexander 3. Persius and the Disease of Midas’ Barber
Emma Strugnell (University of Melbourne) Satire 1: The Last Shot at a Cure
Lazar Maric (Macquarie University)
4. Emperors Roman and Barbarian
Caillan Davenport (Brasenose College, Oxford)
MARLBOROUGH SOUTHLAND
Section 24: CICERO: ORATORY, SOCIETY AND EMOTIONS
Chair: Enrica Sciarrino (University of Canterbury)
14
ASCS 29 Programme and Abstracts
WEDNESDAY, January 30
3. Aristotelian Dynasty
John Walsh (University of Otago) 3. Trying to Meet Expectations
Elizabeth Minchin (Australian National University)
(10 minutes)
2. Is That a spintria in Your pocket, or Are You Just Pleased to See Me?
Geoffrey Fishburn (University of New South Wales)
The Second Temple of Aphaia on Aegina: A Victory Monument for the Persian Wars?
Andrew Stewart (University of California at Berkeley)
CANTERBURY 2
21
ASCS 29 Programme and Abstracts
Spatial Characteristics of the Plautine Stage
Robin Dixon (University of Sydney)
buzzsawbob@hotmail.com
Established wisdom holds that the Roman dramatic stage featured three stage buildings on the scaenae
frons, each with its own double door for entrances and exits, and this model of stage design has been
supported by excavations of the permanent stone theatres constructed after the first century BCE. However,
very limited evidence exists for the spatial characteristics of the earlier semi-permanent or temporary stages,
those stages actually used during Plautus’ lifetime for performance of his works. This paper considers this
limited source material, particularly the playscripts themselves, in an attempt to reconstruct the spatial
characteristics of the Plautine stage.
In Vergil’s Eclogues, Georgics and Aeneid shade and shadows assume an important role in the politicisation
of the text. The shade that hangs over the landscape in the opening lines of the Eclogues is extended to
other uses throughout the Vergilian text, which reveals umbra ambiguously as a setting suitable not only for
song but also as a potentially lethal place. Using the images of shade and shadows, the Vergilian supertext
narrates a tale that is consistent with the themes of the destruction of the natural environment and the
intrusion of the politico-military and urban worlds.
Ambivalence does not feature as one of Aristotle’s criteria for the production of an effective tragedy. This
paper argues, however, that much of the success of Sophocles’ Antigone is due to the ambivalent nature of
the play’s female protagonist. During the prologue, Sophocles encourages his audience to assess Antigone
negatively. This is achieved by accentuating detracting aspects of the protagonist’s character, largely
through the foil that is Ismene, but also through Antigone’s own volatility and the prologue’s unconventional
setting. As the play progresses, the audience must attempt to reconcile Antigone’s presentation in the
prologue with the tragedy’s outcome and the apparent divine sanctioning of the protagonist’s defiant act.
The pleasure derived from watching/reading this tragedy is therefore the resolution of these inconsistencies,
or at least attempt at resolution, which the audience/reader must undergo.
Mallius (or Manlius) Theodorus was praetorian prefect for Italy from 397 to 399 and consul in the West in
399. He had earlier been praetorian prefect for Gaul in the early 380s, before the fall of Gratian, but was in
retirement throughout the reign of Theodosius I, when he lived in Milan engaged in philosophical and literary
pursuits, including corresponding with Symmachus. While only one of his works, De metris survives, he was
a friend of Augustine and his Neoplatonism influenced the future bishop, although Augustine would revise his
views about his former mentor in later life. He is also the subject of a panegyric by Claudian on the occasion
of his consulship. This paper seeks to investigate Theodorus’ careers in order to evaluate afresh the role of
high-status Christians both within Christianity and the wider world of late antiquity. Although much of
Claudian’s panegyric focuses on the fact that Theodorus came out of political retirement in the reign of
Honorius, the questions of why he was asked and why he agreed to do so will be considered.
This paper analyses evidence from the papyrus texts of the third century BC Zenon Archive for language
contact in Ptolemaic Egypt. The purpose is to reassess the nature of the 'ungrammatical' or 'bad' Greek
34