People vs Sendaydiego, et. al.

Chester Cabalza recommends his visitors to please read the original & full text of the case cited. Xie xie!

People vs Sendaydiego, et. al.

G.R. No. L-33254 and 33253
January 20, 1978

Facts:

In these three cases of malversation through falsification, the prosecution's theory is that in 1969 Licerio P.
Sendaydiego, the provincial treasurer of Pangasinan, in conspiracy with Juan Samson y Galvan, an employee of a
lumber and hardware store in Dagupan City, and with Anastacio Quirimit, the provincial auditor, as an accomplice,
used six (6) forged provincial vouchers in order to embezzle from the road and bridge fund the total sum of
P57,048.23.

The provincial voucher in these cases has several parts. In the upper part with the legend "ARTICLE OR SERVICE"
the nature of the obligation incurred is indicated. That part is supposed to be signed by two officials of the provincial
engineer's office and by the governor's representative.

The middle part of the voucher contains five numbered printed paragraphs.

Paragraph 1 is a certificate to be signed by the creditor. It is stated therein that the creditor vouches that the
expenses "were actually and necessarily incurred". In the instant cases paragraph 1 was not signed presumably
because it is not relevant to the purchase of materials for public works projects. Paragraph 2 is a certification that the
expenses are correct and have been lawfully incurred. It is signed by the provincial engineer. Paragraph 3 contains
these words: "Approved for pre-audit and payment, appropriations and funds being available therefore." This is
signed by the provincial treasurer. Paragraph 4 is a certification which, as filed up in Exhibit K, Voucher No. 10724
dated February 28, 1969, certifying that the voucher has been pre-audited and signed by the auditor. Paragraph 5 is
a certification signed by the provincial treasurer that the account mentioned in the provincial engineer's certification
"was paid in the amount and on the date shown below and is chargeable as shown in the summary hereof. " It may
be noted that the provincial treasurer signs two part of the voucher.

Issue:

Whether or not appellants are liable for the crimes of falsicification of public documents and six crimes of
malversation?

Held:

Samson is convicted of six crimes of falsification of a public document and six crimes of malversation. In lieu of the
penalties imposed by the trial court, he is sentenced to the following penalties: For each of the six falsification of the
vouchers (Exh. K, O, P, Q, R and S), Samson is sentenced to an indeterminate penalty of two (2) years of prison
correccional minimum, as minimum, to four (4) years of prision correccional medium, as maximum, and to pay a fine
of three thousand pesos. For the malversation of the sum of P16,727.52 covered by voucher No. 10724 (Exh. K),
Samson is sentenced to an indeterminate penalty of twelve (12) years of prision mayor maximum, as minimum, to
seventeen (17) years of reclusion temporal medium, as maximum; to pay a fine in the amount of P16,727.52, and to
indemnify the province of Pangasinan in the same amount (Criminal Case NO. 23349, L-33252). For the malversation
of the sum of P14,571.81 covered by voucher No. 11995 (Exh. O), Samson is sentenced to an indeterminate penalty
of twelve (12) years of prision mayor maximum, as minimum, to seventeen (17) years of reclusion temporal medium,
as maximum; to pay a fine in the sum of P14,571.81, and to indemnify the province of Pangasinan in the same
amount (Criminal Case No. 23351, L-33254). For the malversation of the sum of P6,290.60 covered by voucher No.
11870 (Exh. Q), Samson is sentenced to an indertiminate penalty of nine (9) years of prision mayor medium, as
minimum, to thirteen (13) years of reclusion temporal minimum, as maximum; to pay a fine of P6,290.60, and to
indemnify the province of Pangasinan in the same amount (Criminal Case No. 23350, L-33253). For the malversation
of the sum of P9,769.64 covered by voucher No. 11871 (Exh. R), Samson is sentenced to an indeterminate penalty
of nine (9) years of prision mayor medium, as minimum, to thirteen (13) years of reclusion temporal minimum, as
maximum; to pay a fine of P9,769.64, and to indemnify the province of Pangasinan in the same amount (Criminal
Case No. 23350, L-33253). For the malversation of the sum of P5,187.28, covered by voucher No. 11869 (Exh. P),
Samson is sentenced to an indeterminate penalty of five (5) years of prision correccional maximum, as minimum, to
eight (8) of prision mayor minimum, as maximum; to pay a fine of P5,187.28, and to indemnify the province of
Pangasinan in the same amount (Criminal Case No. 23350, L-33253).
For the malversation of the sum of P4,501.38 covered by voucher no. 11872 (Exh. S), Samson is sentenced to an
indeterminate penalty of five (5) years of prision correccional maximum, as minimum, to eight (8) years of prision
mayor minimum, as maximum; to pay a fine of P4,501.38, and to indemnify the province of Pangasinan in the same
amount (Criminal Case No. 23350, L-33253). In the service of the twelve penalties meted to Samson, the threefold
limit provided for in article 70 of the Revised Penal Code should be observed (People vs. Escares, 102 Phil. 677),
meaning that the maximum penalty that he should serve is three times the indeterminate sentence of twelve (12)
years to seventeen (17) years, the severest penalty imposed on him, or thirty-six (36) years to fifty-one (51) years
(see People vs. Peñas, 68 Phil. 533). The maximum duration of his sentences should not exceed forty (40) years
(Penultimate par. of art. 70; People vs. Alisub, 69 Phil. 362; People vs. Concepcion, 59 Phil. 518, 68 Phil. 530 and 69
Phil. 58).

The estate of the late Licerio P. Sendaydiego is ordered to indemnify the province of Pangasinan in the sum of
P57,048.23. Samson and the said estate are solitarily liable for the said indemnity (Art. 110, Revised Penal Code).
Samson should pay one-half of the costs. SO ORDERED.