Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gell Alfred 1988 Technology Magic PDF
Gell Alfred 1988 Technology Magic PDF
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=rai.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve
and extend access to Anthropology Today.
http://www.jstor.org
Technology and Magic
ALFREDGELL
'Technological' capabilitiesare one of the distinguishing be ingenious. Techniquesform a bridge, sometimes only
The author is reader in featuresof our species, and have been since a very early a simple one, sometimes a very complicated one, be-
anthropologyat the stage in evolution, if not from the very beginning. It is tween a set of 'given' elements (the body, some raw ma-
LondonSchool of
Economicsand has done
no longer possible to claim 'tool using' as an uniquely terials, some environmental features) and a goal-state
fieldwork in both Papua 'human' characteristic,because there are distinct tool- which is to be realized making use of these givens. The
New Guinea and central use traditionsamong apes, especially chimpanzees, and given elements are rearrangedin an intelligent way so
India. Thispaper was rather more rudimentaryexamples of tool-use among that theircausal propertiesare exploited to bring about a
given on 6 January last some other species as well. Human beings, however, result which is improbableexcept in the light of this par-
at a seminar in London
have elaborated'technological' means of realizing their ticularintervention.
on Tool Use in Man and
Animalsorganizedby intentionsto an unprecedenteddegree. But what is 'tech- Technical means are roundaboutmeans of securing
W.C.McGrewfor the nology'? and how does it articulateto the other species some desired result. The degree of technicality is pro-
RAI's Committeeon characteristicswe possess? portional to the number and complexity of the steps
Biological and Social The answers which have been suggested to this ques- which link the initial givens to the final goal which is to
Anthropology,a report
tion have suffered from a bias arising from the miscon- be achieved. Tools, as extensions of the body which
on the seminarwill
appear shortly in A.T. ceived notion that the obtaining of subsistence have to be preparedbefore they can be used, are an im-
necessities from the environment is the basic problem portantcategory of elements which 'intervene' between
which technology enables us to surmount.Technology is a goal and its realization. But not less 'technical' are
identified with 'tools' and 'tools' with artefacts, like those bodily skills which have to be acquired before a
axes and scrapers,which are presumedto have been im- tool can be used to good effect. Some tools, such as a
ported in the 'food quest'. This 'food quest' has been baseballbat, are exceptionallyrudimentary,but requirea
imagined as a serious, life-or-death, business, and the prolonged (i.e. circuitous) learning-process,in appropri-
employmentof technology as an equally 'serious' affair. ate learning settings, before,they can be deployed to
Homo technologicus is a rational,sensible, creature,not much purpose. Highly 'technical' processes combine
a mythopoeic or religious one, which he only becomes many elements, artefacts,skills, rules of procedure,in an
once he abandonsthe search for 'technical' solutions to elaborate sequence of purposes or sub-goals, each of
his problemsand takes off into the realms of fantasy and which must be attainedin due orderbefore the final re-
empty speculation. sult can be achieved. It is this elaboratestructureof in-
But this opposition between the technical and the tervening steps, the steps which enable one to obtain re-
magical is without foundation.Technology is inadequ- sult X, in order to obtain Y, in order to (finally) obtain
ately understoodif it is simply identified with tool-use, Z, which constitutetechnology as a 'system'.
and tool-use is inadequatelyunderstoodif it is identified The pursuit of intrinsically difficult-to-obtainresults
with subsistenceactivity. by roundabout,or clever, means, is the peculiaraptitude
Although it may be useful for certain classification of the technological animal,Homo sapiens. But it is not
purposes-especially in prehistory-to identify 'technol- at all truethatthis propensityis displayedexclusively, or
ogy' with 'tools', from any explanatorypoint of view even mainly, in the context of subsistenceproduction,or
technology is much more than this. At the very mini- thatthis aptitudeis unconnectedwith the playful and im-
mum, technology not only consists of the artefacts aginative side of humannature.Indeed,to state the prob-
which are employed as tools, but also includes the sum lem in these termsis to see immediatelythattherecan be
total of the kinds of knowledge which make possible the no possible distinction,from the standpointof 'degree of
invention, making and use of tools. But this is not all. technicality', between the pursuit of material rewards
'Knowledge' does not exist except in a certain social through technical activity, and the equally 'technical'
context. Technology is coterminous with the various pursuit of a wide variety of other goals, which are not
networks of social relationships which allow for the materialbut symbolic or expressive. From the palaeoli-
transmission of technical knowledge, and provide the thic period on, human technical ability has been
necessary conditions for cooperation between individ- devoted, not just to making 'tools' such as axes and har-
uals in technical activity. But one cannot stop even at poons, but equally to the making of flutes, beads,
this point, because the objectives of technicalproduction statues,and much else besides, for diversion, adornment,
are themselves shaped by the social context. Technol- pleasure. These objects had, without any doubt, their
ogy, in the widest sense, is those forms of social rela- place in a 'sequence of purposes' which went beyond
tionships which make it socially necessary to produce, the elementary delight they afforded their makers. A
distributeand consume goods and services using 'tech- flute, no less than an axe, is a tool, an element in a tech-
nical' processes. nical sequence; but its purpose is to control and modify
But what does the adjective 'technical' mean? 'Tech- humanpsychological responses in social settings, rather
nical' does not, I think, indicate an either/ordistinction thanto dismemberthe bodies of animals.
between productionprocesses which do, or do not, make If a flute is properlyto be seen as a tool, a psychologi-
use of artefacts called 'tools'. There can be 'tech- cal weapon, what is the technical system of which it
niques'-for instance, the 'techniques of the body' listed forms a part?At this point I would like to offer a classi-
by Mauss-which do not make use of tools that are arte- ficatory scheme of human technological capabilities in
facts. What distinguishes 'technique' from non-tech- general, which can be seen as falling under three main
nique is a certain degree of circuitousness in the headings.
achievement of any given objective. It is not so much The first of these technical systems, which can be
that techniquehas to be learned,as that techniquehas to called the 'Technology of Production', comprises tech-
6 ANTHROPOLOGYTODAY Vol 4, No 2, April 1988
nology as it has been conventionally understood, i.e. the artful use of whips, sugar-lumps,smacks, caresses,
roundaboutways of securing the 'stuff' we think we etc., all of which we can deliver because we possess
need; food, shelter,clothing, manufacturesof all kinds. I hands, and know how to use them on animals all the bet-
would include here the productionof signals, i.e. com- ter because we continuallyuse them on one another.
munication. This is relatively uncontroversial and no Here we enter the domain of the third of our three
more need be said aboutit at this point. technologies, which I will call the 'Technology of En-
The second of these technical systems I call the chantment'. Human beings entrap animals in the mesh
'Technology of Reproduction'.This technical system is of humanpurposesusing an arrayof psychological tech-
more controversial, in that under this heading I would niques, but these are primitive by comparison with the
include most of what conventional anthropologydesig- psychological weapons which humanbeings use to exert
nates by the word 'kinship'. control over the thoughts and actions of other human
It must occur to anyone, nonetheless, who makes the beings. The technology of enchantment is the most
comparison between human and animal societies, that sophisticatedthatwe possess.
humansocieties go to extreme lengths to secure specific Under this heading I place all those technical
patterns of matings and births. Once infants are born, strategies, especially art, music, dances, rhetoric, gifts,
their care and socialization is conducted in a technically etc., which humanbeings employ in order to secure the
elaboratedway, making use of special devices such as acquiescence of other people in their intentions or pro-
cradles, slings, swaddling-boards,etc., and later on, toy jects. These technical strategies-which are, of course,
weapons, special educationalparaphernaliaand institu- practisedreciprocally-exploit innate or derived psycho-
tions, and so on. The reproductionof society is the con- logical biases so as to enchant the other person and
sequence of a vast amount of very skilled manipulation cause him/herto perceive social reality in a way favour-
on the partof those with interestsat stake in the process. able to the social interests of the enchanter.It is widely
Humanbeings are bred and rearedundercontrolledcon- agreed that characteristically human 'intelligence'
ditions which are technically managed, so as to produce evolved, not in response to the need to develop superior
precisely those individuals for whom social provision survival strategies,but in response to the complexity of
has been made. human social life, which is intense, multiplex, and very
Of course, animals also engage in purposive action in fateful for the individual.Superiorintelligence manifests
order to intervene in reproductive processes, securing itself in the technical strategies of enchantment,upon
and defending mates, succouring their young, and so which the mediationof social life depends.The manipu-
forth. Sometimes they seem to be quite cunning about it. lation of desire, terror,wonder, cupidity, fantasy,vanity,
I do not want to draw any hard and fast line between an inexhaustible list of human passions, offers an
human and animal kinship here. But what I would sug- equally inexhaustiblefield for the expression of techni-
gest is that the really telling analogies between human cal ingenuity.
and animal kinship systems are not to be found among My present purpose is not to explore the domain of
wild populationsof animal species, but among domesti- the technology of enchantment,but merely to point out
cated animals, such as horses and dogs, whose breeding that it exists, and that it has to be considered, not as a
behaviour, and social learning, human beings have separateprovince, i.e. 'Art'-opposed to technology-but
learnedto control using many of the same techniques as as a technology in itself.
human beings use on themselves, with very much the
same goals in view. We are (self-) domesticatedanimals; I have sketched in the scope of the idea of 'Technol-
our animal analogues are the other domesticated ani- ogy'. Now I want to consider the relationshipbetween
mals. technology-defined as the pursuit of difficult-to-obtain
Biologically, we possess the neotenous attributes(per- objectives by roundaboutmeans-and 'magic'. Magic is,
sistence of juvenile traits in the adult stage) which also or was, clearly an aspect of each of the three techno-
often distinguish the domesticatedvariety of an animal logies I have identified, i.e. the technologies of produc-
species from its wild-type cousins (wolves vs. domesti- tion, reproduction,and psychological manipulation,or
cated dogs, for instance). Domesticatedvarieties of ani- 'enchantment'.But magic is differentfrom these techno-
mals are biddable, docile, creatures, because we have logies, each of which involves the exploitation of the
made them so. And so are we. The vaunted human at- causal propertiesof things and the psychological dispo-
tributes of teachability, flexibility-a kind of permanent sitions of people, which are numbered,of course, among
childlike acceptance-aretraitswhich have been evolved, their causal properties. Whereas magic is 'symbolic'.
not in the course of mighty struggles against the hostile Naturally,in stating this, I am conscious that there has
forces of nature,but adaptingto the demand for a more been a prolonged debate about magic, and that not
and more 'domesticable' human being. This is the everybody agrees that magic is 'symbolic' at all; since it
phenotypewhich has been awardedmaximumreproduc- can be interpretedas an attempt to employ spirits or
tive opportunities,and which now predominates,not be- quasi-physicalmagical powers to intervene(causally) in
cause it has been 'selected' by nature,but because it se- nature. There is abundantnative testimony to support
lected itself. this view, which is often the correctone to take from the
The patternsof social arrangementswhich we identify standpointof cultural interpretation,since nothing pre-
as 'kinship systems' are a set of technical strategies for vents people from holding at least some mistakencausal
managing our reproductivedestiny via an elaborate se- beliefs. However, from an observer's point of view,
quence of purposes. Accordingly, the whole domain of there is a distinction, in that efficacious technical
kinship has to be understoodprimarilyas a technology, strategies demonstrablyexploit the causal propertiesof
just as one would see horse-breedingand horse-break- things in the sequence of purposes, whereas magic does
ing, or dog-breedingand dog-training,as 'technical' ac- not. The evolutionary survival value of the magical as-
complishments.But how do we secure the acquiescence pects of technical strategiesis, therefore,a genuine prob-
of horses and dogs in our intentions, apartfrom special lem.
breeding programmes,so as to secure a supply of tract- I take the view that 'magic' as an adjunctto technical
able animals? Evidently, it is by exploiting natural procedures persists because it serves 'symbolic' ends,
biases in horse and dog psychology; in other words, by that is to say, cognitive ones. Magical thought for-
INDEX
ANTHROPOLOGICAL
ANTHROPOLOGICAL INDEX, the Royal Anthropological Institute's bibliographical quarterly, entered its 26th year of publi-
cation in 1988. It covers nearly all the article in the periodical literature received by the Museum of Mankind Library in Lon-
don, which incorporates the former RAI Library. It is an official organ of the International Union of Anthropological and Eth-
nological Sciences, which recommends that all institutions where anthropology is taught should subscribe to ANTHROPOLOGI-
CAL INDEX. Periodicals from all countries and in all major institutions are indexed. The INDEX is arranged geographically
with sub-divisions by broad subject, the easiest method of access for the area specialist. At the beginning is a General section,
also broken down by sub-division. Within the divisions (General, Physical Anthropology, Archaeology, Cultural Anthropology
and Ethnography, Linguistics) entry is alphabetical by author. An annual author index also contains brief subject entries for obi-
tuaries and anonymous articles. Photocopies of articles may be ordered from the Museum of Mankind. The subscription for
1988 is ?48 (US$77), from the RAI Distribution Centre (same address as A.T.), or from the usual subscription agencies. Most
back volumes are available.