Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CODE: 212032_3
Presented to:
KARLA NATHALIA TRIANA
Tutor / Professional in International Business
Content
Abstract 3
Comparative Chart 4
Conclusions 6
References 8
3
Abstract.
In the present collaborative work the group compilation is taken taking into account the
answers of the members of the collaborative group and The comparative table is
presented, taking into account the case of innovation over the course of the semester;
the above in order to understand the topics proposed in Unit 1, 2 and 3.
The purpose of this work is to able to lead, manage and make decisions in order to
solve real problems related to valuation and negotiation of intangible assets; the above
is carried out by deepening concepts according to the reading issued from the
documentary sources referenced by the UNAD.
4
also being created in Ethiopia, to get purchased in two sizes: the small one,
footwear that grows in Africa and the which normally serves for children
possibility of carrying them out in Haiti is between five and nine years old and
also contemplated. the large one that is for ages between
"A shoe that lasts five years and grows in 10 and 14 years old. Thanks to the
five sizes With this shoe, a child can solid materials with which they are
always have a pair of shoes that fit in. made, leather and rubber last five
They can stay healthy and happy - ready years and are easily repairable. who
to take the next step for their future" as created the final design after
such the goal was durability more than analyzing over 70 potential ideas and
design aesthetics, so it's basically a testing 100 prototypes in four schools
functional footwear. This adapts to the in Kenya for a year. Currently, the
size of the foot with the different positions growing shoe is conceived as a form
of the strips and can be changed, as the of what Because International calls
limb grows "practical compassion" and that's why
Its business model and pricing
structure are based on donations from
people in developing countries
7
Conclusions.
References.
Baek, D., Sul, W., Hong, K., and Kim, H. (March 1, 2007) A technology valuation model
to support technology transfer negotiations. R&D Management. Retrieved from:
http://bibliotecavirtual.unad.edu.co:2051/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=buh&AN=32100351&lang=es&site=eds-live
Vega-González, L., & Saniger Blesa, J. (2010). Valuation methodology for technology
developed at academic R&D groups. Journal of Applied Research and Technology,
8(1), 26-43. Recovered from: http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/jart/v8n1/v8n1a2.pdf