Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ma - Navabian Aliaghat@ Ut - Ac.ir
Ma - Navabian Aliaghat@ Ut - Ac.ir
@yahoo.com
! "#$ %! !& #&
' (
)$! !
ma_navabian
aliaghat@ ut.ac.ir
! "#$ %! !& #&
' # !)+ *
-#
! "#$ %! +.$/
' # !)+ ,
*
3
< 2 .+
'
2. 6 78
9: #! 23 "& #! 23 45 & 0)1
'"
!#&
! 2. 6 " #! C2B
: 0)1
8 5# " !A)+ 5 &
>? =!
.. !#&
& B !"
)#? " # D/ B
!
)#? E+.
2L #M 2 5 "+25 F K J 2F5 # " 2L + 0) H I .J J GF5
. # C
/ !#
)#? !C 0N. O# + #!
" P!C J 2F5 .
P:J/ !#&
.J J GF5 Q ! #R. 2 2)B
' P#: P009 <
) "
F1X3? (Schaap and Bouten, 1996) < ST+ PUN 2 45 & D/ F#
et al., ) #F ST+ (Tamari et al.,1996) #% # (Pachepsky et al., 1996) #F
2[.3 2L !! Z>? < Y ) .!
L #5 (Schaap et al., 2001) #% ST+ (Schaap 1998
N/ G'.3 +
'# P\!U 2 1 .J J GF5 Q .5 L N/ #! !#
)#?
.#!
E+. !
F] N/
8
<.[ .!5 2`# 45 & !#&
J 2%5 Q + <
^_ Z>? < #!
.!
' #
+#
!# Ks
& +. #U c
9 P#d
N
+. < [ C
)#?
ab
*4 5/671 0/7 (
)
$)( *$%
Q < .!#! # #!
N/
8 e # O# ! "+Q 2$ + e # ANN
(
' g Q]+)
f.
5"!
? g !U " 2 \
2 \ 2+ " ]L #N 2 \ .3
)X+
? #)/+
#
R !# !# !! #!
& #! 2L . ' !# G \ # 2F5
G \ < .( =F5) + 5 =F
#!
& #! 2L + C
/ G \ 2F5
/& G \ .5 T f 5"!
? 2[ 2 \ < #! .!
'
=F 5 .? 2 \ 2L G \ !U "
)X+
?
<.[ .. #
0)+ 5 C
/
#N .. & + N/ "& . &
B M h
M O+ 2 \
#!
!U 2 \ < !U .+ 5
< P_M ..5 O
#!C 2N# I i
M " # G \
G]L 2 2 \
QU
#! 2L .)1 !/ 2 j)T (") 2JT #! P\J < " I
.5 =0). P\J < i
M "
.!!
' k
e
!
2
I " 2)B Q0) P_M
.
( Net )
!# & 4 B #! ]
G \
" # (W X ) 5 " C
/
j ij i
xn
w0
x1
w1 f
x2
w2
x3 w3 yi
wn
xn
bi
H ..! # (2)+&) "+QUB H I " # )B #! !# (y ) !/ C
/ G+9
i
yi = f ( Net j ) =
1
()
1+ exp ( )
- Netj
1 Bias
1- Activition function
2-Bainary function
3- Sigmoid function
4- Tangent hyperbolic
5- Linear function
6- Gauss function
!
= t5 .5 k]N C
/ C 2F5 P\J "
s J 2F5 ^"& .
.!!
' 2+9 & C
/ qX+ 5 2e
2F5 2 1T 2L + P#: < 2 \ .3
)X+
?
2+9
" GN# i
M " (w ) 2F5 " h_:
N/ 6 k]N C
/ 2F5 C
/ G1 0
ij
1- Back - Propagation
2- Steepest Descent
"+2. 2 w
=`1 =g
) # < :(1gdm) 203 !
01 )*$ %
&# ( /
"+f. =
G]g
! C #! ^"& " 2]g
#! " #!
^# < #! .!
' #
!A)+ !#
.!!
'
+ Z 6B x g " #1 #! E
< 2 5
.
N/ H !
L =
g ^# < -+ :(2LM) 4*# 5 6 7 )*$ %
&# ( 2
z6C "
2 5 & !U yB
+ ^# < P:J/ " .5 2F5
)#?
.+ 5 2)/.5 J 2F5 5"& ) # <
)U
+
! 0
B -_L #! 2 . !
' kT)
L G0N. D/ B 20 " !A)+ D/ 2 }~ !U
.5 2)B
'
R #! 45 &
&
a ! 1% C (:#! ) I& #0 " !9 2.! #! D/
Sandy Clay Clay Loam )B
+ #
))+ , i #! 2 45 &
'"
Silty Clay Loam Silt Clay Loam Clay Sand Sandy Clay Loam Loam Sandy Loam Loam
.B
' P#:
m t> f
C . )B !" '> " !A)+ 45 & !#&
Z>? < c 2L & "
P#d
N
+. < .2! .9. !! # B
m M# P#d
B H " 00g t> f
C
.5 2)B
' #L 2 yB
)#?
'"
" ^# ! & #U c
9
)+! < .5 !A)+ KI 2800 Q l]' Y.+dA )+! " 45 &
9:
'"
+& =0 =g
R
B ]
#! Q < .+ 5 2)/+ I3 #! a # !
.
E
2 00g
m t> f
C
'"
.5 L k& 2 " L
'" "
#L I " !A)+
.! EU%
))+
f
' */,*/ /,/ &
!0 2.! 2L !
' !A)+
).F? 2/]$ 5# "
2 P#d
N
#B P9A: )+! 2]+ 2 # B
m M#
)# ^# 2
/ P#d 1
B
1- Conjugate Gradient
2 - Marquardt Lovenberg
3 Pressure plate
⎣ ⎦
()
⎩ ⎭
..5 -# ]+ :#! E
2 mt my & #! 2L
2$ !! Y ) .B
' P#: 45 & (#
yB (
)#?
a <U #R. 2 +1g 6&
&
#
ab <
) & #U c
9 P#d
N
+. <
av =T]T
m t> f
C (
)#?
.#! 45
5"& ) # .5 !A)+ Neural Network #6Bf
" .J J GF5 Q !
!! G.! "+ !9
`+ 2)+& H J GF5 ^"&
# P&L# #)q?
2)B
'#F kT) 2F5 5"& "+!? =g
P`6C . 2 2 ^"& #
" C
/
.5
<= >
*
!U
s .? G \ Z #& <
) 5 N/ -g ^# .
J 2%5 ^"& -+
C
/
)#? !#&
C ^"& G]g
#
% !U 5"& ) # ,
9) H 4 ,&
.? G \
'"
!0 N/ +
'# Q # .? G \ Z #& ! E+. #U .!5 2`#
R!#
C
E+. #& 2 <)B +! .U 2(R2~1) \ < E
e .!
$ < E
e G+9 5 !#&
.5 C
/
)#? !#&
+#
!# +1g 6& " 5 2)/.5
av (
)#? " !A)+ J G%5 Q 2+ Z>? < #!
..)B
' #
P#d
N
+. #U c
9 P#d
N
+. < # Q < !# G \
)#? :()Q •
.!! =%
av =T]T
#U c
9 <
av =T]T
m t> f
C =5 Q < !# G \
)#? : (*)Q •
.!
/ P#d
N
+.
/ P#d
N
#U c
9 +. <
av =T]T
)#? # Q < !# G \ : (,)Q •
.!! =%
( !! :#! ) 2 ,~
/ G }~ " .! 45 & < C
/
)#?
.5 2)B
'#% ! ^"& J G%5 "&
( !! :#! *) 2 2%5 ^"&
#
% ,~
.? G \ u Z #& yB Q , #! 5 Z "& PA) Z #& "
u Z #& (*QC) * Q
#
% } 2 \
#!
.? G \ ! Z #& (QC) Q
!#&
E+. !#&
! Z #& <
E+. (,QC) , Q
#
% *
.? G \
.5 kT) 45 &
–
–
Ks Ks
2
R
R2
1 1 3 0.54 1 1 3 0.7
2 1 5 0.52 2 1 5 0.65
3 1 7 0.6 3 1 7 0.74
4 1 9 0.51 4 1 9 0.73
5 1 11 0.52 5 1 11 0.72
6 1 13 0.57 6 1 13 0.73
7 2 3 0.46 7 2 3 0.65
8 2 5 0.57 8 2 5 0.67
9 2 7 0.68 9 2 7 0.72
10 2 9 0.7 10 2 9 0.71
11 2 11 0.67 11 2 11 0.72
12 2 13 0.69 12 2 13 0.74
–
Ks
R2
1 1 3 0.8
2 1 5 0.79
3 1 7 0.83
4 1 9 0.81
5 1 11 0.78
6 1 13 0.79
7 2 3 0.73
8 2 5 0.79
9 2 7 0.77
10 2 9 0.78
11 2 11 0.79
12 2 13 0.77
/, * Q
/< E
e Q
/} < E
e #U 5 2`# Q !#&
!
#! 5 2`# J 2F5 Q 2 1 Q . 2 5 2`# Q 2+
.(, =%5)& +! 2 , Q
/ & #! 5 2`# Q )1 E
e <
\ 2L (Schaap et al., 2001) ROSETTA #6Bf
2
Q%+? ]$ ,, Z% #! M#
m > f
C -# ]+ <5 :#! !#
)#? =5 Q
.!
E+. !#&
! #! 5
4 4
R2=0.7 R2=0.74
3.5 3.5
L n K ann (cm /d a y)
3 3
2.5 2.5
2 2
1.5 1.5
1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
4
R2=0.83
3.5
2.5
1.5
1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Ln Kmeasured (cm/day)
T 8<
()
K S (estimated) = 1.02exp ( 3.36 + 75.4 δg2 − 4.75BD θe ) - 0.21 R2=0.68 ()
K S (estimated) = 2.85exp ( 4.45 − 2.25log δg + 0.572ln θe ) -10.76 R2=0.61 ()
#! J G%5 2$ ! +
'# P\!U 5 2`# J G%5 Y ) G1 0
.5 2 # J G%5
E+. !
%] ] ..5 45 & !#&
E+. !
%]
0N. N# ! / #!
J G%5 ^"& # M 2$ #M 2 .!! 1 !! =]9 2 6 t9 !
+ 2)B
#% 2%5 ^"& #! 2$ !! !#&
& " . ^"& # C
/ !# 5
.5 !! #& e # A
+ u #
. +
'# =]9 2 6 2$ g #! . !A)+
!"
# $% # &
!"
%
:"
9 6 
56 7
- .. /0
#1
/23 ()*+ # !,-'
6 < 8
!" # =; '< !" 2 !
# 1 0 . &;
!"
.<#
:"
9
6
1
:" # C%, B %
?
-# !"A)1 !
3# !" <? !<# ??@ 1 =3>
H %"
>
J% , 6 K"; <? ;
I %"
> H $; . F GE %"8< DE A)1 % 6
" !
#
RS6 < < %
3# !"
# M < N #; %<"
# 6
-
OP <# QE
" &.
E L<H &#
.
J3XDE 6 U; R# %$3 V W
1 6
. @ + YT] .\%
+ J3 3
. !" # %; .YTZ[ .' !
X Y
. @ + ^Tb .'6 <Va
H
+ J3 3
.8
H @ `"
#H .YT]] .U .' _= X ^
c[^.86 <Va
H
+ J3 3
. @ `" !" .YTZY .U .' _= X T
. @ +
.(
# 80 ). ?
R#
# N 6<" %<" .e . YTZ^. %." .' 6 S . .N .' &# Xd
4- Pachepsky, Ya. A., D. Timlin and G. Varallyay. 1996. Artificial Neural Networks to
estimate soil water retention from easily measurable data Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60:727-733.
5- Schaap, M. G. and W. Bouten. 1996. Modeling water retention curves of sandy soil
using neural networks. Water Resour. Res. 32:3033-3040.
6- Schaap, M. G., F.J. Leij and M. Th. Van Genuchten. 1998a. Neural network analysis for
hierarchical prediction of soil water retention and saturated hydraulic Conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc.
Am. J. 62-847-855.
7- Schaap Marcel G. Feike J. Leij and Martinus Th. Van Genuchten. 2ool. ROSETTA: a
computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchial pedotransfer functions.
Journal of Hydrology. 251.pp 163-176.
8- Shiozawa. S, G. S. Campbell . 1991 . On the calculation of mean particle diameter and
standard deviation from sand , silt and clay fractions. Soil Sci. Vol 152 , No.6.PP 427-431.
9- Tamari, S., J. H. M. Wosten and J. C. Ruzi-Suarez. 1996. Testing an artificial neural
network for predicting soil hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60:1732-1741.