Good things that we pursue and bad ingredients first before liquids. things we should avoid. Learning how to play basketball. Right way of acting and wrong ways – against the rules to walk more of acting. than 2 steps without dribbling Acceptable and unacceptable in the ball. human behavior. MATTERS THAT CONCERN LIFE AND Ethics is about determining the DEATH SUCH AS: grounds for the values with War particular and special significance to Capital punishment human life. Abortion KINDS OF VALUATION (not included in the MATTERS THAT CONCERN HUMAN discussion of ethics) WELL-BEING SUCH AS: Poverty 1) Aesthetics Inequality derived from the word Or sexual identity “aesthesis” (sense or feeling) Are included in the discussion of and refers to the judgement of ethics. personal approval and disapproval that we make about ETHICS AND MORALS what we see, hear, smell or 1) Morals taste. Refers to specific beliefs or Personal aesthetics preferences. attitudes that people have or to Ex: his taste of music and her describe acts that people taste of clothes. perform. 2) Etiquette Individuals personal conduct Approval or disapproval Immoral (fallings short of concerning certain actions. behavior) Concerned with right and wrong 2) Ethics actions. Discipline of studying and Ex: it is right to knock on understanding ideal human someone’s door upon entering behavior and ideal ways of while it is wrong and rude to thinking. barge into someone’s room. Intellectual discipline belong to 3) Techniques philosophy. Technique is derived from Greek Acceptable behavior (ethical) word techne which refers to the Unacceptable behavior proper way of doing things. (unethical) Professional ethics – legal ethics 2. Issue – refer to the particular for the proper comportment of situations that are often the lawyers and other people in legal source of considerable and profession: medical ethics for inconclusive debate. Ex: doctors. Media ethics for writers euthanasia and reporters. 3. Moral dilemma - one is torn PHILOSPHY – “love of wisdom” Philia between choosing one of two and Sophia. goods or choosing between the Remains as the unique 4. lesser of two evils. discipline. - individual can choose only one Metaphysics – Reality from a number of possible Epistemology – basis of actions and there are compelling determining what we know. ethical reasons for the various Axiology – study of value and choices. is often divided into - example: a mother wanting to aesthetics. 1) value of beauty feed her hungry child, but then and ethics 2) value of human recognizing that it would be actions. wrong for her to steal.
DESCRIPTIVE AND NORMATIVE
REASONING 1. Descriptive Reports how people or asking “why” can bring us groups make their moral to another level of valuations w/o making thinking any judgement either for PRINCIPLES or against these valuations. rationally established 2. Normative grounds by which one What could/should be justifies and maintains considered as the right her moral decisions and way of acting? judgements. Refers on what we ought MORAL THEORY to maintain as the standards or bases for systematic attempt to moral valuation. establish the validity of maintaining moral ISSUE, DECISION, JUDGEMENT AND principles. DILEMMA. Framework – theory is a 1. Moral issue – the question of system of thought of respect for one’s property. ideas. Theory of interconnected ideas and compel our obedience in a way that the structure through nothing else can. which we can evaluate The divine can command absolute our reasons or valuing a obedience on one’s part as the certain decision or implications of her actions involves judgement. her ultimate destiny. SOURCES OF AUTHORITY CONS 1. LAW Multiplicity of religions. Each faith A guide to ethical behavior demands differently from its Criminal and civil codes adherents which would apparently Law is enforced by the system of result in conflicting ethical sanctions administered through standards. persons and institutions which all Conceptual level. One requires help compelling us to obey. believer to clarify her understanding Law is the basis of ethics providing of the connection between ethics with the objective standard that is and the divine. Ethyphro by Plato is obligatory and applicable to all. an example. The law cannot tell us what to 4. CULTURE pursue only what to avoid. Cultural Relativism – ethically 2. Positive Law acceptable and unacceptable is Refers to the different rules and relative tom or that is to say, regulations that are posited or put dependent on one’s culture. forward by an authority figure that Cultural relativism seems to conform require compliance. to what we experience, which is the 3. RELIGION reality of the differences in how The idea that one is obliged to obey cultures make their ethical her God in all things. valuations. Divine Command Theory – the By taking one’s culture a s a divinity called God commands and standard, we are provided a basis one is obliged to obey her creator for our valuations. Thou shall not kill thou shall not Teaches us to be tolerant of others steal. from different cultures. We are in no Religion is not simply prohibitive, position to judge whether the but it also provides ideals to pursue. ethical thought or practice of Religion as basis of ethics has the another culture is acceptable or advantage of providing us only set of unacceptable. commands but also a supreme Our own’s culture moral code is authority that can inspire and either superior or inferior to ``any other but provide standards that are “no one can tell me what is right and applicable to us. wrong. “no one knows my situation better than myself” I am entitled to ARGUMENTS ON CULTURAL RELATIVISM my own opinion” it is good if I say it 1. REALITY OF DIFFERENCE is good. Different cultures have different Sense of personal independence. mora codes, we cannot say that any one moral code is the right one. 2. Open minded 2. Psychological Egoism We are in no position to render any Human beings are naturally self- kind of judgement on the practices centered, so all of our actions are of another culture. Generous and always motivated by self-interest. open minded way of respecting Describes the underlying dynamic others. behind all actions. 3. Judgement on our own cult Underlying basis for how one acts. If our culture was the basis for This ego or self has its desires and determining right and wrong, we interests, and all of our actions are would be unable to say that geared towards satisfying interests. something within our cultural “ I watch a favorite movie or read a practice was problematic precisely book because I want to go. I want to because we take our culture to be go to mall and shopping because I the standard for making enjoy that. judgements. We do things in pursuit of our own 4. We can maintain it only by self-interests all the time. following the presumption as Motivation behind many of the a single- clearly defined actions one perform which are substance or something fixed obviously self-serving. and already determined. 3. Ethical Egoism SENSES OF THE SELF It does not impose all our actions are already inevitably self-serving. 1. Subjectivism Instead, ethical egoism prescribes Individual thinking is at the heart of that we should make our own ends, all moral valuations. our own interests, as the single She is the one who is co9nfronted overriding concern. We may act in a with the situation and is burdened way that is beneficial to others. with the need to make a decision or Not just some pleasant pursuit of judgement. one’s desire, but the imposition of a Individual is the sole determinant of will power that is potentially what is morally good or bad, right destructive of both self and others. and wrong. CHAPTER II Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that argues for the goodness and pleasure and the determination of right behavior based on the usefulness of the actions consequences. Means that pleasure is good and that the goodness of an action is determined by its usefulness. One action or behavior is good as much as they are directed toward the experience of the greatest pleasure over the pain for the greatest number of people. It is the usefulness of results that determines whether the action or behavior is good or bad. Mill and Bentham is interested whether these actions contribute or not to the total amount of resulting happiness in the world. Sssss