This document discusses several principles of statutory construction that courts use when interpreting laws, including:
1) Giving weight to how a statute has been implemented and understood since enactment (contemporaneous exposition).
2) The usual practice prevailing over the literal text of the law.
3) Reasons why long-standing interpretations are given deference.
4) When established interpretations can be disregarded, such as if they are ultra vires or an abuse of discretion.
This document discusses several principles of statutory construction that courts use when interpreting laws, including:
1) Giving weight to how a statute has been implemented and understood since enactment (contemporaneous exposition).
2) The usual practice prevailing over the literal text of the law.
3) Reasons why long-standing interpretations are given deference.
4) When established interpretations can be disregarded, such as if they are ultra vires or an abuse of discretion.
This document discusses several principles of statutory construction that courts use when interpreting laws, including:
1) Giving weight to how a statute has been implemented and understood since enactment (contemporaneous exposition).
2) The usual practice prevailing over the literal text of the law.
3) Reasons why long-standing interpretations are given deference.
4) When established interpretations can be disregarded, such as if they are ultra vires or an abuse of discretion.
o Answer: No, the contention of BIR is not tenable. Weight accorded to the usage and practice (contemporaneous exposition) o Bone of contention What decision prevails o Usual practice prevails over the letter of the law o Answer: No, the contention of Juan Dela Cruz is not valid. Reasons why contemporaneous construction is given much weight When contemporaneous construction is disregarded o Contemporaneous means continuously o Ultra vires acts Grave abuse of discretion of the executive/legislative branches Literal meaning or plain meaning rule o Verba LEgis Is language of the law is clear, just apply the law Spirit of the law o Ratio legis o When there is a conflict between the letters of the law and the intent of the legislative, the intent of the legislative should prevail. Literal import must yield to intent o There are different meanings, choose one that best fits the situation Correcting clerical error o Answer: No, the case does not put the law meaningless. Construction to avoid absurdity o Pertaining to consequence o Consequences intended by the legislative shall be the interpretation of the court
Eto sinabi niya di ko alam kung mock midterm or quiz ba