Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial,
religious or national group. The term was coined in 1944 by Raphael Lemkin. It is defined in
Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
(CPPCG) of 1948 as "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in
part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing
serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the groups
conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing
measures intended to prevent births within the group and forcibly transferring children of the
group to another group."
Determining what historical events constitute a genocide and which are merely criminal or
inhuman behavior is not a clear-cut matter.
In the past 150 years, tens of millions of men, women and children have lost their lives in
genocide or mass atrocities. Millions have been tortured, raped or forced from their homes. In
1948, three years after the fall of Nazi Germany and the end of some of the worst human
atrocities in history, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG), which was eventually ratified
by 140 nations, including the U.S. in 1986. The Convention marks its 60th anniversary on Dec. 9
against the backdrop of a monumental human rights crisis in Darfur and an enduring debate over
the effectiveness of the CPPCG and other measures aimed at stopping genocide.
Genocide denotes crimes committed "with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national,
ethnical, racial or religious group." Forced sterilization or other measures designed to prevent
births, the removal of children from a group, or conditions of life inflicted on a group to bring
about its demise could also be considered genocidal acts. The definition also stipulates that
genocidal crimes are committed against specific kinds of groups with the deliberate purpose of
eradicating them. The intent is key; in Darfur, for example, some have argued that it is
impossible to prove that the Sudanese Janjaweed militias are trying to eradicate entire groups;
they may, in fact, just want to displace them from disputed land. However, criminal that may be,
it is not automatically genocidal. The criteria have been a source of debate and have often made
prosecuting genocide a complicated legal undertaking, despite the somewhat common use of the
label in the media.
In 1998, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda established the precedent that rape
warfare is in fact a crime of genocide, in its judgment on the extermination of an estimated
800,000 ethnic Tutsis at the hands of Rwandan Hutu militias. It was a landmark addition to the
term’s legal definition, and a judgment that could be important in future International Criminal
Court proceedings related to the current situation in Darfur. Many observers have recounted
stories of rape being used systematically as a weapon in Sudan for the purpose of ethnic
cleansing, and the International Criminal Court is expected to decide in early 2009 whether to
issue an arrest warrant, requested in July, for Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir on charges of
genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.
On Dec. 8, a task force led by former U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright recommended
that President-elect Barack Obama create a dedicated interagency group that would respond to
genocide by analyzing emerging threats and coordinating action with other nations. The panel,
which also includes former U.S. Central Command chief Anthony Zinni, former Senate majority
leader Tom Daschle and former Secretary of Defense William Cohen, recommended that the U.S.
government invest $250 million in new funds for prevention and response.
Meanwhile, as the crisis in Darfur heads into its sixth year, with an estimated 5,000 displaced
people dying each month, the 60-year-old Convention remains an unrealized promise. Beyond
the legal hurdles, there are grave political repercussions to responding to an ongoing atrocity.
Some say accusations could prompt deeper isolation and violent reprisals, making conditions
worse for the victims and those trying to help them.
The Holocaust
It began with a simple boycott of Jewish shops and ended in the gas chambers of Auschwitz as
Hitler and his Nazi followers attempted to exterminate the entire Jewish population of
Europe. The Holocaust took the lives of close to six million Jews during the World War II era.
Anti-semitism was the central component of Nazi ideology. While the Nazis also murdered
many millions of Poles, Russians, Roma, Sinti, Serbs, Czechs, homosexuals, and political
opponents, only the Jews were slated for total annihilation. The “final solution” was partially
successful through the process of genocide. The Nazi Party who first targeted the Jews, then
isolated them into ghettos, then deported their victims to concentration camps where most
perished.
The Rape of Nanking
In December of 1937, the Japanese Imperial Army marched into China’s capital city of Nanking
and proceeded to murder 300,000 out of the 600,000 civilians and soldiers in the city. After just
four days of fighting, Japanese troops smashed into the city with orders issued to “kill all
captives.” The terrible violence – citywide burnings, stabbings, drownings, rapes, and thefts –
did not cease for about six weeks. It is for the crimes against the women of Nanking that this
tragedy is most notorious. The Japanese troops raped over 20,000 women, most of whom were
murdered thereafter so they could never bear witness.
https://genocideeducation.org/resources/modern-era-genocides/
https://www.facinghistory.org/topics/genocide-mass-violence
http://www.history.com/topics/what-is-genocide
http://genocidewatch.net/genocide-2/what-is-genocide/