Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The CSR Act or Export ban – Forest Resources Conservation and Shortage Relief Act 1990
HCA – Habitat Conservation Areas, which is 25% timberland within the owl’s range
U.S in total:
Timberland own: 6.4 million acres of commercial timberland, 1/4 is in Northwestern, US
(1/3 forest product division revenue, 60% forest product operating profit)
o 880k acres in Montana, Libby (80%), (20% stumpage); Bonner (50%), (50%
stumpage); other firms
o 180k acres in California: sell logs / stumpage to domestic processors, 100 mbf
o 240k acres in Oregon + 320k in Washington, Klickitat (50%), (50% stumpage);
Roseburg (25%; 75% stumpage); 70mbf other firms
Total CIC Wood Product Mills: 13
Northwest: 4 wood production mills / No pulp & paper capacity
o 2 in Libby & Bonner (Montana), lumber and plywood manufacturing
o 1 in Roseburg (Oregon), plywood manufacturing
o 1 in Klickitat (Washington), lumber manufacturing
Most valuable timberland: Kapowsin farm (Washington)
o High-value trees, rotation cycle 55 years
o Annual sale volume: 100mbf
o Exploitation mechanism: Clearcut
o Sale mechanism: Auction, mostly end up in export markets
o Non-operating business: Recreational service
o Pulp and papermaking capacity
Weldwood - Canada
o Long-term contracts on land owned by Canadian Government
o Solid wood products + Pulp and papermaking Mill
Brazil
Plantation site 1500 miles from the tropical rainforest, Pulp and papermaking capacity
Vertically integrated (a firm owning from timberland to mills and pulp & paper capacity)
Logs/ Timber/ Timberland
Solid wood products
Pulp and paper Product
1979:
o Revenue: $3.75b; earnings ratio: $247m/$2.86b
o Main revenue-generating line: solid wood products (48%)
o Late 1970s: Timber prices exploded due to inflation and housing growth
Early 1980s:
o Inflation and construction market collapsed
o Lumber prices (Revenue) low, cost of mill’s raw material (timber) high
o CIC retrenched, cutting back capital investment
1984:
o Closed 5 lumber & plywood mills in the Northwestern; Acquired a similarly forest
products firm St. Regis;
o Timberland acreage doubled, book value tripled
o Long-term debt doubled (from $1.08b – $2.17b)
o Generate Revenue from selling (not fit strategically) mills: Sold 2 pulp mills, retained
all timberland
Late 1980s:
o Main revenue-generating and profit-generating line: pulp & paper
o Capacity modification & expansion cost: $269m in 1987
1989:
o Capacity modification & expansion cost $857m
o Warren Buffett buy 8% of CIC (~ $300m convertible preferred stock)
Harvest methods:
o Clearcut: harvesting all trees in the area (Environmentally Harmful)
o Clear cut + intensive tree cultivation (fertilize, plant & apply herbicides by helicopter)
o Harvesting cycle reduced by 10-20 years (more effective / greater economic benefits)
o Post-harvest site preparation & replanting = $160-$200 per acre
Processing:
o Volume of products (lumber/plywood) = Volume of side-products (chips, sawdust,
shavings, bark)
o Cost of integrated pulp & paper mill = Cost of sawmill/plywood mill x 20 to 30
Sawmills (lumber mill) & Plywood mills: Input = Logs; Output = Lumber, Plywood
o Lumber, plywood, paper: More valuable than logs/chips
o Can profitable be transported further
o Regional / national market: Numerous participants
o Construction & remodeling markets consume most lumber & plywood, but HIGHLY
CYCLICAL
Pulp mills: Input = logs / chips; Output = Paper
o Logs and chips are cheaper to produce
o Market geographical limitation, should be processed NEAR harvest spot to avoid high
freight cost
o Local market only: Few buyers
o Pulp & paper mill will incur stiff cost (high cost) penalties for interrupted production
a. On Governmental agencies
Owl habitat focused mainly in federal land; private timberland was barely affected.
Winning bidders made small down payment and paid the rest during actual harvest (started
within 3-5 years from auction)
STATE AGENCIES
o State-controlled timberland accounted for 1/8 of total timberland
o Exploitation mechanism: Same as Federal agencies
o Operation: Required by law to maximize its net contribution to the state coffers.
b. On timber labor
Federal agencies Estimation: Restriction would eliminate 28,000 related jobs by 2000
Approval for FWS & the ES Act: FWS & Endangered Species Committee,
Environmentalists & Environmental Groups, Federal Agencies (USFS & BLM) &
Thomas Committee,
Disapproval for FWS & the ES Act - The Exemption from the Act by Congress: Timber
Communities & Trade Association.
7. The Forest Resources Conservation and Shortage Relief Act 1990 , DeFazio response
and its impacts
7.1. The Conservation and Shortage Relief Act 1990 (Export ban)
1974: Export of logs from federal land was banned
The CSR Act 1990:
o Content: Permanent ban on export of federal logs
o Purpose: Encourage domestic conversion of raw material (log) to processed product
(moving up the GVC)
7.2. The impact of the Export ban
Export from state-owned land in Washington & Oregon: From 550-100mbf
Export ban supporters: environmentalist / small mill owners / some political appointees
Supporting reasons: Export ban would lessen the timber supply crunch
Export ban protestors: longshoremen / teachers’ union / free trade supporter
Protesting Export Ban reasons:
o Loss revenue from log sales (which helped support school system)
o Irrelevant politic motivation that transgressed property rights
o Expansion of protectionism
CASE REQUIREMENT:
3. What steps to take in managing the relation between CIC and the Congress and agencies?