Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Petitioner
Versus
Respondent
is not only well concerned with the facts of the case but also
3. That the brief facts of the case are the petitioner submitted an
petitioner be redressed, but the respondent till date did not take
6. That the law is very clear on the same point laid down on
(1993 SCMR 550) PLD 2003 Lah. 228 (c), context whereof
PRAYER
accordance with law, in the supreme interest of justice and equity and
PETITIONER
Through:-
Hamza Butt
Advocate High Court
Adnan Bhatti
Advocate High Court
Office No. 2 First Floor
Fahad Arcade 13, Regal Street
63 The Mall, Lahore
CERTIFICATE:
This is 1st petition before this Hon’ble Court on the subject matter as
per information supplied by the petitioner.
IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE, WITH THE POWERS
OF JUSTICE OF PEACE LAHORE
In re:-
Muhammad Rameez Zarar Vs. SHO
AFFIDAVIT: of
Active Media through its HR Manager Muhammad Rameez Zarar
s/o Muhammad Zarar Sharif r/o 18-A, sector XX, DHA Pahse III.
22-A 22-B Cr.P.C. are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
Verified on Oath at Lahore on this 11th of Feb, 2020 that the contents
of the above affidavit are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
DEPONENT