Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SSRN Id3510046 PDF
SSRN Id3510046 PDF
Reni Handayani1
Student Of Economics Faculty, State University of Jakarta
Dr. Osly Usman, M.Bus.2
Lecturer of the Faculty of Economics, State University of Jakarta
Email: renihandayani0192@gmail.com
oslyusman@unj.ac.id
ABSTRACT
This research is made to know and analyze the factors that Affect Learning
Achievement in the form of Motivation, Competence Lecturer, Environmental Family
and Community Environment. The technique used in the sampling in this study was
the Smart PLS, with a sample of 244 respondents. Data collection using questionaires
using Smart Partial Least Square with Smart PLS 3.0 software.
The results and implications of this study are terrorism that this study supports previous
research the which states that previous research has been Carried out by Bebi Ratnasari
(2016) with the title Influence Of Learning Motivation, Teacher Competency, And The
Family Environment Of Learning Achievements Accounting Trade Company Class XI
Accounting Vocational School YPKK 2 Sleman where the results of this study indicate
that customer satisfaction has a positive effect on improving Learning Achievement.
Based on the results of data analysis known that there posisif influence and significant
correlation between learning motivation towards Achievement of Student Learning
Path coefficent value 0,066. Lecturer competence significantly influence the
achievement of Student Learning Path coefficent value of 0.047. Family environment
significantly affect the value of Student Learning Achievement Path coefficent 0,981.
While no effect on the Community Environmental Achievement of Student Learning.
It is seen from the results obtained path is negative coefficient that is equal to -0.049.
Keyword:
Motivation Learning, Competency Lecturer, Environmental Family, Community
Environment and Learning Achievement
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The dependent variable in this study is Achievement. While the independent variable
in this study is Motivation, Competence Lecturer, Environmental Family and
Community Environment. Methods of the data analysis used in this study are the Smart
PLS. Smart or Smart Partial Least Square PLS is the same statistical software with
LISREL and AMOS goal is to examine the relationship between variables, latent
variables and the good fellow with an indicator variable, or manifest. Partial least
squares is a multivariate statistical technique that can be to handle a lot of the response
variable and explanatory variables at once. This research was conducted in Indonesia
with the number of respondents 244 people. Analysis of the Data in this study using
techniques of measurement tests using Smart PLS models and Structural Models.
First Model
The figure shows that the construct of motivation to learn was measured by 7
pieces indicators namely MB1, MB2, MB3, MB4, MB5, mb6, and MB7. And construct
Lecturer Competence is also measured by the 7 indicators of KD1, KD2, KD3, KD4,
KD5, KD6, and KD7. Likewise, the Family Environment constructs measured by the
7 indicators of LK1, LK2, LK3, LK4 LK5, LK6, and LK7. Environmental and
community also uses seven indicators of LM1, LM2, LM3, LM4, LM5, LM6 and LM7.
With the indicator arrows between latent constructs are leading indicators that show
that the study uses a relatively reflective appropriate indicator to measure the impact
or relationships to be studied (hypothesis) is denoted by arrows between the constructs.
Table 4.1
Result For Cross Loading
Family Community Learning
competence environmen environmenta Motivation achievemen
Lecturer t l to learn t
KD.1 0856
KD.2 0838
KD.3 0866
KD.4 0678
KD.5 0891
KD.6 0885
KD.7 0886
LK.1 0761
LK.2 0747
LK.3 0753
LK.4 0715
LK.5 0933
LK.6 0935
LK.7 0935
LM.1 0417
LM.2 0623
LM.3 0626
LM.4 0846
LM.5 0865
LM.6 0874
LM.7 0881
MB.1 0641
Tabel 4.2
Validity Test
Competence Family Community Motivation Learning
Lecturer environment Environmental Learning achievement
KD.1 0866
KD.2 0843
KD.3 0876
KD.5 0906
KD.6 0922
KD.7 0912
LK.1 0747
LK.2 0734
LK.3 0739
LK.4 0716
LK.5 0914
LK.6 0942
LK.7 0942
LM.4 0972
LM.5 0984
LM.6 0987
LM.7 0994
MB.2 0997
MB.3 0987
MB.4 0985
MB.5 0986
MB.6 0922
MB.7 0982
PB.4 0996
Test the validity of using the correlation between scores of items with a score
of its construction. Measurements with a reflective indicator indicates a change in an
other indicator in the same construct are changed (or removed from the model).
Indicator reflective suitable for measuring the perception that this study using
reflecktive indicators.
Based on data from the second order data above shows that all indicators has
a value of > 0.5 which means that the indicators used in this study is valid or has met
the convergent validity.
Furthermore, a indicators also need to be tested to determine the discriminant
validity of these indicators reflective or not. The method used to view the discriminant
validity of this research is to look at the value of the square root of Average Variance
Extracted (AVE). The suggested value is above 0.5. Here is an AVE in this study:
Tabel 4.3
AVE
Indicator Average Variance Extracted (AVE)
Competence Lecturer 0780
Family Environment 0688
Community Environmental 0969
Motivation Learning 0973
Learning Achievement 0982
The table above shows that the value AVE of Competence Lecturer, Family
Environment, Community Environmental, Motivation Learning and Learning
Achievement above 0.5. Lowest AVE value amounted to 0.688 on the construct of
Family Environment.
2. Reliability Test
Reliability testing done by looking at the value of the composite indicator that
measures the reliability of the construct. The results will show the composite
reliability satisfactory value if the value is > 0.7. Here is a composite value of
reliability in this study:
Tabel 4.4
Composite Reliability
The table above shows that the value of composite reliability for all constructs
is above 0.7 which shows all constructs in the research model meets the discriminant
validity. The lowest of composite value is equal to 0.938 which is the constructs Family
Environment.
Test reliability can be also be strengthened by Cronbach's Alpha with the
suggested value is > 0.6. Here is the value of Cronbach's Alpha in this study:
Tabel 4.4
Cronbach’s Alpha
From the above table, the value of Cronbach's Alpha for this research constructs
showed the value of > 0.6. Then the indicator that measures the construct in this study
can be said to be reliable.
B. Testing Structural Model (Inner Model)
PLS using nonparametic test to determine the level of significance of the path
coefficient, where the value t (t value) produced by running the algorithm on a
smartPLS bootsrapping used to determine whether the hypothesis is accepted. At
the 0.05 significance level the hypothesis would be supported if the t-statistic
exceeds the critical value is 1.645.
From the above table, the value of T statistics and P values for indicators of this
study shows that the value of T statistic > 1.645 and P value > 0.05 then the
indicators that measure the construct in this study was significant.
Table 4.6
Path Coefficent
The above table shows the influence of free variable with variable tied. From
the above data it can be concluded that the competence Lecturers have an influence on
the Learning Achievement of 0.004. The family environment has an influence on
learning achievement at 0,981. Community environment has an influence on learning
achievement by 0.490. And Motivation has an influence on learning achievement by
0.066.
Based on the above presentation, a variable that has a major influence on
student learning achievement UNJ is environment friendly. Meanwhile, variables that
have low against the influence of Student Learning Achievement UNJ is Community
Environment. Community Environmental coefficent Path value is negative which
indicates that the Community Environment has a negative direction of the relationship.
It can be said, if the student earned UNJ Achievement is not necessarily the case
because of their good relationships within the community. Conversely, if the student
does not earn Achievement UNJ well it does not mean that because of the association
which is not good in the neighborhood masyaraktnya. The above description shows
that there is a mutual effect - similar and significant correlation between competence
Lecturer,
BIBLIOGRAPHY