Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: In the present study, the oxidation peak current of dopamine (DA) in a 0.2 M Britton–Robinson (B–R) buffer so-
Received 28 August 2015 lution was optimized by experimental design for its determination in the presence of tyrosine (Tyr) at the surface
Received in revised form 1 November 2015 of graphene oxide modified carbon paste electrode (CPE/GO). A central composite rotatable design (CCRD) and
Accepted 8 December 2015
response surface methodology (RSM) were used to evaluate the effects of the variables by the differential pulse
Available online xxxx
voltammetry (DPV) method. These variables include scan rate, step potential, modulation amplitude, graphene
Keywords:
oxide amount and pH. Characterizing of the CPE/GO was investigated by electrochemical impedance spectrosco-
Multivariate optimization strategy py (EIS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and cyclic voltammetry (CV) techniques. Also other voltammetric
Graphene oxide nano-sheet techniques such as chronocoulometry and linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) were applied for electrochemical
Dopamine studies of DA. Using these methods, diffusion coefficient (D = 9.2 × 10−5 cm2 s−1) and kinetic parameters
Tyrosine such as electron transfer coefficient (α = 0.6) and exchanging current density (j0 = 14.6 μA cm−2) of DA
Electrochemical techniques were determined. Then, under the optimized conditions linear concentration range for DA was from 0.08 to
2.30 μM and the detection limit was found to be 8.60 nM. Finally CPE/GO could be employed for determination
of DA in real samples such as human blood plasma.
© 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2015.12.028
0167-7322/© 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
32 S.M. Ghoreishi et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 215 (2016) 31–38
The main aim of optimization is to find the experimental conditions 3. Results and discussion
which give the best response. Response surface methodology [23] is an
area of the experimental design that deals with the optimization and 3.1. Surface analysis by EIS and SEM studies
modeling of a system. This methodology was introduced by Box and
Wilson [24] at the beginning of the 1950s. EIS technique is very sensitive for the investigations of electrode/
In this work, we introduce a new method for determination of DA in electrolyte interaction. EIS spectrums in Fig. 1 show two distinct parts:
the presence of Tyr based on a sensitive and simple nanostructured (1) a semi-circle part related to the charge transfer process, (2) a line
sensor and multivariate optimization strategy. This method presents defining a region of semi-infinite diffusion of species in the electrode,
electrochemical studies along with central composite rotatable design recognizable different of charge-transfer resistance (Rct) value was ob-
(CCRD) and response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of served upon the stepwise formation of the modified electrode. The Rct
all effective factors on electrochemical responses. Moreover, we value for the bare CPE was 5.87 kΩ while it was 1.53 kΩ for CPE/GO. It
described preparation a GO modified carbon paste electrode (CPE/GO) might be because of the presence of GO on the CPE surface, which
as a sensitive sensor for the determination of DA in the presence of played an important role in accelerating the transfer of the electrons.
Tyr. Finally, to demonstrate the potential of the modified electrode for In addition to EIS measurements, SEM was used to investigate the
electrooxidation of DA in real samples, we have examined this method surface morphological characters of the CPE and GO (Fig. 2A [25] and
for the voltammetric determination of DA in human blood plasma Fig. 2B, respectively). Fig. 2B shows the GO has a typical flake-like
samples. shape with slight wrinkles on the surfaces.
h i
Fig. 3. Differential pulse voltammograms of (a): CPE/GO in B–R buffer solution, (b): CPE in
Ep ¼ E þ ð0:0591=nÞ log ðOxÞa =ðRedÞ –ð0:0591 m=nÞ pH
b
ð1Þ
the presence of 2.30 μM DA, and (c): (a) + 2.30 μM DA.
Fig. 4. Three-dimensional (3-D) response obtained from the regression equation (coded Fig. 5. Three-dimensional (3-D) response obtained from the regression equation (coded
values of variables) for chemical factors. A and B variables correspond to pH and graphene values of variables) for instrumental factors. A, B and C variables correspond to scan
content respectively. rate, step potential and modulation amplitude respectively.
34 S.M. Ghoreishi et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 215 (2016) 31–38
LSV of CPE/GO in 0.2 M B–R buffer solution (pH 4.0) containing var-
DA behavior at the surface of CPE/GO was also investigated by
ious concentration of DA with a sweep rate of 150.0 mV s−1 are shown
changing in scan rate in CV techniques. Fig. 9A shows the cyclic
in Fig. 7A. Tafel region is the rising part of voltammograms, which is
voltammogrames of DA at the CPE/GO surface in different scan rates
effected by the electron transfer kinetics between DA and CPE/GO. If
(ν). Randles–Sevcik equation (Eq. 3) is used for quasi-reversible process
deprotonation of DA is an enough fast step, and assuming the number
[28]:
of electrons involved in the rate determining step is nα = 2, by averag-
ing the slopes and intercepts of Tafel plot (Fig. 7B), the charge transfer
Ip ¼ 2:69 105 n3=2 AD1=2 C ν1=2 ð3Þ
coefficient (α) and the exchanging current density (j0) are calculated
to be 0.60 and 14.08, respectively [28].
Where n is the number of electron involved in the oxidation process,
A is the surface area, D is diffusion coefficient, C is concentration of
3.6. Chronocoulometry measurements reagent and ν is scan rate ranging of 30.0–130.0 mV s−1 for this study.
The oxidation peak current of a solution containing 2.00 μM DA in B–R
The catalytic oxidation of DA at the surface of CPE/GO was stud- buffer (pH = 4.0) increases linearly with square root of scan rate
ied using chronocoulometry. Fig. 8 shows chronocoulograms ob- (Fig. 9B) that suggesting a diffusion-controlled process of DA at the
tained from solution containing different concentration of DA from modified electrode, so the linear regression equation was found to be:
0.67 to 1.12 μM in B–R buffer by setting the working electrode po-
tential at 400.0 mV. In chronocoulometric studies, Cottrell equation Ipa ¼ 0:4979 ν1=2 −0:0596 R2 ¼ 0:9921
Fig. 6. (A): DPV of 2.00 μM DA with pH of 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 (from a to e, respectively) collected at a 365.6 mV s−1 scan rate at the surface of CPE/GO. (B): Plot of intensity: I/μA vs. pH
and (C) Plot of electrochemical potential:Epa/V vs. pH.
Fig. 7. (A): Linear sweep voltammograms of CPE/GO in B–R buffer (pH = 4.0) containing 1.85, 2.01 and 2.30 μM DA (a–c) at a sweep rate of 150.0 mV s−1, (B): Tafel plot derived from linear
sweep voltammograms.
3.8. Differential pulse voltammetry measurements of dopamine and concentration of DA in the range of 0.079–2.30 μM. The respective
calibration equation is obtained:
DPV technique has a much higher current sensitivity and better res-
olution than CV; therefore it was used to estimate the limit of detection Ipa ðμAÞ ¼ 0:4899 C ðμMÞ þ 0:0381; R2 ¼ 0:9961
of DA. Fig. 10A shows the differential pulse voltammogrames of DA at
the CPE/GO in 0.2 M B–R buffer solution (pH = 4.0) under other opti- Therefore from the analysis of the data, the limit of detection (3 s) of
mized conditions. Also Fig. 10B shows the relationship between Ipa DA was found to be 8.6 nM.
Fig. 8. Chronocoulograms obtained at CPE/GO in 0.2 M B–R buffer solution (pH = 4.0) for various concentrations of DA, with potential step at 400.0 mV and a to d correspond to 0.67, 0.82,
0.98 and 1.12 μM of DA, (B): Plots of I vs. t1/2 (s1/2) obtained from chronoamperograms a-e, and (C): A plot of the slope of the straight lines versus the concentration of DA.
36 S.M. Ghoreishi et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 215 (2016) 31–38
Fig. 9. Cyclic voltammograms of CPE/GO in a B–R buffer solution (pH = 4.0) for 2.00 μM DA, in various scan rates: 30.0, 40.0, 50.0, 70.0, 80.0, 90.0, 100.0 and 130.0 mV s−1 (from inner to
outer). (A): Peak current vs. E (mV) and (B): intensity, I (μA) vs. ν1/2.
3.9. Determination of DA in the presence of Tyr slope) at the surface of CPE/GO in the absence and presence of Tyr is
same (Fig. 11B). Therefore the modified CPE/GO is a capable sensor for
One of the main purposes of this study was sensitive detection of DA determination of DA in the presence of Tyr.
in the presence of Tyr. For achieving the purpose, DPV technique was
performed in the constant concentration of Tyr (6.0 μM) and varied con- 3.10. Interference studies
centration of DA (0.27–1.80 μM). Fig. 11A shows differential pulse
voltammogrames of a solution containing differential concentration of The proposed method with mentioned modified electrode showed
DA in the presence of Tyr at the CPE/GO in 0.2 M B–R buffer solution. good selectivity for determination of DA in the presence of common in-
− − −
As can be seen high concentration of Tyr dose not interfere in detection terfering species such as Na+, NH+ 2− +
4 , NO3 , Cl , CO3 , K and I . Also,
of DA. According to this study, the sensitivity of DA (calibration curve some amino acids such as phenylalanine, cysteine and tryptophan had
Fig. 10. (A): DPV of CPE/GO in 0.2 M B–R buffer solution (pH = 4.0), containing different concentrations of DA. The letters a–g corresponds to: 0.19, 0.23, 0.43, 0.97, 1.80, 2.01 and 2.30 μM
of DA and (B): Plot of the electrocatalytic peak current as a function of DA concentration.
S.M. Ghoreishi et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 215 (2016) 31–38 37
Fig. 11. (A): DPV of CPE/GO in 0.2 M B–R buffer solution (pH = 4.0) containing 6.00 μM Tyr and various concentrations of DA containing a-f corresponding to: 0.27, 0.43, 0.82, 1.43, 1.57 and
1.80 μM and (B): Plot of Ip (μA) as a function of DA concentration (μM).
no effect on the oxidation peak of DA. The results are shown in Table 2. 3.12. Real sample analysis
The tolerance limit was taken as the maximum concentration of the
foreign substances which caused an approximately ±5% relative error In order to demonstrate the capability of the proposed method in
in determination of DA [29]. real samples, direct determination of DA was performed in human
blood serum. Prior to investigation of the samples were diluted 100
times in pH 4.0, B–R buffer solution. Standard addition method is used
3.11. Stability and repeatability of CPE/GO to determine of DA with DPV technique. Recovery results are shown
in Table 3. These results were obtained by three repeatable determina-
Two important factors for preparation of a modified electrode are tions on each sample and were acceptable, showing that this method is
stability and repeatability. These properties were checked using DPV useful for the determination of DA in real samples.
data obtained in optimized experimental conditions. These studies
were carried out in B–R buffer solution containing 1.80 μM DA in 4. Conclusion
Table 3
Determination of DA in human blood serum samples.
1 0.00 0.00 –
2 0.20 0.20 101.26
3 0.40 0.39 99.15
4 0.60 0.59 98.63
5 0.80 0.81 101.37
6 1.00 0.99 99.58
Fig. 12. Stability of CPE/GO in the presence of DA.
38 S.M. Ghoreishi et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 215 (2016) 31–38
Table 4
Comparison of the efficiency of some modified electrodes used in the detection of DA.
be 9.01 nM. This value was close to the value obtained in the absence of [15] J. Kim, L.J. Cote, J. Huang, Two dimensional soft material: new faces of graphene oxide,
Chem. Res. 45 (2012) 1356–1364.
Tyr (8.6 nM). A comparison of the proposed method with the other re- [16] C.X. Lim, H.Y. Hoh, P.K. Ang, K.P. Loh, Direct voltammetric detection of dna and ph sensing
search groups for detection of DA at the surface of chemically modified on epitaxial graphene: an insight into the role of oxygenated defects, Anal. Chem. 82
(2010) 7387–7393.
electrodes indicates that the CPE/GO is superior to the existing elec- [17] O. Akhavan, E. Ghaderi, R. Rahighi, Toward single-DNA electrochemical biosensing by
trodes with regard to detection limit and multivariate optimization graphene nanowalls, ACS Nano 6 (2012) 2904–2916.
(Table 4). The results indicate that the modified CPE/GO is very sensitive [18] O. Akhavan, E. Ghaderi, R. Rahighi, M. Abdolahad, Spongy graphene electrode in electro-
chemical detection of leukemia at single-cell levels, Carbon 79 (2014) 654–663.
with high selectivity for electrochemical sensor applications. [19] O. Akhavan, E. Ghaderi, E. Hashemi, R. Rahighi, Ultra-sensitive detection of leukemia by
graphene, Nanoscale 6 (2014) 14810–14819.
[20] S.-S. Li, H.-L. Wu, Y.-J. Liu, H.-W. Gu, R.-Q. Yu, Simultaneous determination of tyrosine and
Acknowledgments dopamine in urine samples using excitation-emission matrix fluorescence coupled with
second-order calibration, Chin. Chem. Lett. 24 (2013) 239–242.
[21] R.F. Thompson, The Brain: A Neuroscience Primer, Worth Pub, New York, 2000.
We are grateful to University of Kashan for supporting this work [22] D.G. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, fourth ed. Wiley, New York, 1997.
with Grant 211037-19. [23] G.A. Lewis, D. Mathieu, R. Phan-Tan-Luu, Pharmaceutic Experimental Design, Marcel-Dek-
ker, New York, 1999.
[24] G.E.P. Box, K.B. Wilson, On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions, J. Roy.
References Statist. Soc. Ser. B Metho. 13 (1951) 1–45.
[25] A. Khoobi, S.M. Ghoreishi, M. Behpour, S. Masoum, Three-dimensional voltammetry: a
[1] L. Lin, J. Chen, H. Yao, Y. Chen, Y. Zheng, X. Lin, Imultaneous determination of dopamine, chemometrical analysis of electrochemical data for determination of dopamine in the
ascorbic acid and uric acid at poly (Evans Blue) modified glassy carbon electrode, presence of unexpected interference by a biosensor based on gold nanoparticles, Anal.
Bioelectrochemistry 73 (2008) 11–17. Chem. 86 (2014) 8967–8973.
[2] S. Reyes, Y. Fu, K.L. Double, V. Cottam, L.H. Thompson, D. Kirik, G. Paxinos, C. Watson, H.M. [26] M.H. Pournaghi-Azar, H. Dastangoo, R.F.b. baj, Simultaneous determination of dopamine
Cooper, G.M. Halliday, Trophic factors differentiate dopamine neurons vulnerable to and its oxidized product (aminochrom), by hydrodynamic amperometry and anodic strip-
Parkinson's disease, Neurobiol. Aging (2012). ping voltammetry, using the metallic palladium and uranalyl hexacyanoferrate coated alu-
[3] J.M. Zen, P.J. Chen, Selective voltammetric method for uric acid and dopamine detection minum electrodes, Biosens. Bioelectron. 25 (2010) 1481–1486.
using clay-modified electrodes, Anal. Chem. 699 (1997) 5087–5093. [27] T. Luczak, Preparation and characterization of the dopamine film electrochemically depos-
[4] D. Amin, Titrimetric determination of catecholamines and related com-pounds via bro- ited on a gold template and its applications for dopamine sensing in aqueous solution,
mine oxidation and substitution, Analyst 111 (1986) 255–257. Electrochim. Acta 53 (2008) 5725–5731.
[5] K. Vuorensola, H. Sirén, U. Karjalainen, Determination of dopamine and [28] A.J. Bard, L.R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods, Fundamentals and Applications, Wiley,
methoxycatecholamines in patient urine by liquid chromatography with electrochemical New York, 2001.
detection and by capillary electrophoresis coupled with spectrophotometry and mass [29] Y. Wang, Z. Chen, A novel poly(taurine) modified glassy carbon electrode for the simulta-
spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. B 788 (2003) 277–289. neous determination of epinephrine and dopamine, Colloids Surf. B 74 (2009) 322–327.
[6] L.R. Junior, J.C.B. Fernandes, G.D. Neto, L.T. Kubota, Development of a new FIA- [30] H. Wang, F. Ren, R. Yue, C. Wang, C. Zhai, Y. Du, Macroporous flower-like graphene nano-
potentiometric sensor for dopamine based on EVA-copper(II) ions, J. Electroanal. Chem. sheet clusters used for electrochemical determination of dopamine, Colloids Surf. A
481 (2000) 34–41. Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 448 (2014) 181–185.
[7] L.F. Xiao, J. Chen, C.S. Cha, Elimination of the interference of ascorbic acid in the ampero- [31] S. Qi, B. Zhao, H. Tang, X. Jiang, Determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine, and uric acid by
metric detection of biomolecules in body fluid samples and the simple detection of uric a novel electrochemical sensor based on pristine graphene, Electrochim. Acta 161 (2015)
acid in human serum and urine by using the powder microelectrode technique, J. 395–402.
Electroanal. Chem. 495 (2000) 27–35. [32] X. Zhu, Y. Liang, X. Zuo, R. Hu, X. Xiao, J. Nan, Novel water-soluble multi-nanopore
[8] V.S. Ijeri, P.V. Jaiswal, A.K. Srivastava, Chemically modified electrodes based on macrocyclic graphene modified glassy carbon electrode for simultaneous determination of dopamine
compounds for determination of vitamin C by electrocatalytic oxidation, Anal. Chim. Acta and uric acid in the presence of ascorbic acid, Electrochim. Acta 143 (2014) 366–373.
439 (2001) 291–297. [33] Y.-L. Xie, J. Yuan, H.-L. Ye, P. Song, S.-Q. Hu, Facile ultrasonic synthesis of graphene/SnO2
[9] S.M. Ghoreishi, A. Khoobi, M. Behpour, S. Masoum, Application of multivariate curve reso- nanocomposite and its application to the simultaneous electrochemical determination of
lution alternating least squares to biomedical analysis using electrochemical techniques at dopamine, ascorbic acid, and uric acid, J. Electroanal. Chem. 749 (2015) 26–30.
a nanostructure-based modified sensor, Electrochim. Acta 130 (2014) 271–278. [34] F. Gao, X. Cai, X. Wang, C. Gao, S. Liu, F. Gao, Q. Wang, Highly sensitive and selective detec-
[10] M. Rubianes, G. Rivas, Highly selective dopamine quantification using a glassy carbon elec- tion of dopamine in the presence of ascorbic acid at graphene oxide modified electrode,
trode modified with a melanin-type polymer, Anal. Chim. Acta 440 (2001) 99–108. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 186 (2013) 380–387.
[11] Y.L. Zhou, R.H. Tian, J.F. Zhi, Amperometric biosensor based on tyrosinase immobilized on a [35] T.E. Mary Nancy, V.A. Kumary, Synergistic electrocatalytic effect of graphene/nickel hy-
boron-doped diamond electrode, Biosens. Bioelectron. 22 (2007) 822–828. droxide composite for the simultaneous electrochemical determination of ascorbic acid,
[12] S.M. Ghoreishi, M. Behpour, A. Khoobi, M. Salavati-Niasari, Electrochemical study of a self- dopamine and uric acid, Electrochim. Acta 133 (2014) 233–240.
assembled monolayer of N,N’-bis[(E)-(1-pyridyl) methylidene]-1,3-propanediamine [36] Q. Lian, A. Luo, Z. An, Z. Li, Y. Guo, D. Zhang, Z. Xue, X. Zhou, X. Lu, Au nanoparticles on
formed on glassy carbon electrode: preparation, characterization and application, Anal. tryptophan-functionalized graphene for sensitive detection of dopamine, Appl. Surf. Sci.
Methods 5 (2013) 6727–6733. 349 (2015) 184–189.
[13] S. Alwarappan, A. Erdem, C. Liu, C.Z. Li, Probing the electrochemical properties of graphene [37] S.-J. Li, J.-Z. He, M. Zhang, R.-X. Zhang, X.-L. Lv, S.-H. Li, H. Pang, Electrochemical detection
nanosheets for biosensing applications, J. Phys. Chem. C 113 (2009) 8853–8857. of dopamine using water-soluble sulfonated graphene, Electrochim. Acta 102 (2013)
[14] D.R. Dreyer, S. Park, C.W. Bielawski, R.S. Ruoff, The chemistry of graphene oxide, Chem. 58–65.
Soc. Rev. 39 (2010) 228–240.