Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Process of Hybrid
Organizations using the
Theory Of Change
EVIDENCE FROM PASSO POSITIVO
3
ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED
4
LITERATURE
REVIEW
APPROACHES I AND II
MAIN CONCLUSIONS
APPROACH I
6
APPROACH II
7
MAIN CONCLUSIONS
Social Impact
Extreme I Extreme II
Income
Generation
8
THE PROCESS
CONTEXT ANALYSIS
PROCESS: THE THEORY OF CHANGE
PEST Analysis
The PEST Analysis was used to assess the external context of NGDOs in Portugal, considering the
Political-Legal, Economic, Social and Technological factors that affect the sector.
10
SWOT Analysis
The SWOT analysis of Passo Positivo allows to position the organization according to its main
strengths and weaknesses, given the external context’s opportunities and threats presented in the
PEST analysis.
11
Stakeholder Level of interest
Mapping
Low High
Internal Stakeholders: members (board, staff,
interns and volunteers);
Connected Stakeholders: partners, suppliers, Local community
individual donors, funders, competitors and Government
beneficiaries; Low General public
Individual Donors
External Stakeholders: Portuguese government, the Competitors
local community, the general public and the media. Power
13
Impact
Improvement of the children well-being
Decrease of social isolation and exclusion
Increase of physical and psychological well-
being
THE THEORY
Better quality of life
Increase of physical and psychological well- OF CHANGE
being
Improvement of the global citizenship
competences
14
BOTTLENECKS
BROADNESS OF THE
PROJECTS
15
STRATEGIC CHANGE
Definition of Strategic
Goals, SMART
Objectives and
Activities
Definition of results to
achieve in the future
and performance
metrics
Prioritization of
Change will be structured as the
initiatives
backward mapping of the Social
Value Chain
Revision of resource
(human, partnerships and
financial) allocation 16
RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS
18
RECOMMENDATIONS
Knowledge Partnerships
Materials
19
CONCLUSIONS
LIMITATIONS AND PROPOSAL
MAIN CONCLUSIONS
LIMITATIONS AND PROPOSAL
The PEST Analysis, the SWOT Analysis and the Stakeholder Mapping presented
some limitations and were not enough to depict the context of Passo Positivo in full
Stakeholder
Individual
Circle + Value
SWOT Analysis
PESTE Analysis Creation
+ SWOT Action
Framework
Plan
(Five Forces)
21
PESTE ANALYSIS
Economic
Political-Legal
What are the Political-
• Portuguese economic growth
• Stable governmental structure; Legal factors?
• Positive expectations of growth on the
• External policies leading to the hosting of P contributions for social causes;
refugees and greater investment in
professional training; • More donations and volunteering taskforce.
Which social values What are the
• Benefits of the NGDO legal status; define the sector? economic impacts?
• Scarce and limited financing options for
NGDOs; Technologic
E E
• High dependency from public funding
• Information “one click away”;
23
SWOT ACTION PLAN
Opportunities Threats
Challenges Warnings
S1.2: + O1.1: Scaling Banco de Fraldas in partnership S1.2 + T1.2: Reliability of the sector concerning the donated
Strengths
Limitations Risks
W1.2 + O1.1: Government unable to support all W2. 1 + T2.1: Services may lack some internal capability,
Weaknesses
Beneficiaries
Fidelidade
Comunidade, BPI
Interpretation:
Staff Members • Senior management (upwards):
orange
• External stakeholders (outwards):
blue
Direction of influence: upwards, outwards or downwards • Project team (downwards): green
• Project management peers: purple
Rivalry
Engage collaborating
organizations.
Partner organizations collaborating
Suppliers R and working as a network (nationally
and internationally).
Empowerment
Suppliers take participation in the Empowerment of
and engagement
activities and are perceived as key- suppliers.
of clientes. Clients
stakeholders.
S C The outcome of each project is
expected to empower the main
New Entrants beneficiaries: elders and low-mobility
individuals, low-income families and
humanitarian workers.
Partner with organizations with similar
services, like Misericórdias and Substitutes
municipalities.
Invite other The organization
organizations to E S only competes
join. with itself. Engaging and collaborating with
similar organizations allows to reduce
the risk of substitution.
27
MAIN CONCLUSIONS
aligned with
The Theory of
Change Limitations:
Future research:
• Application of the given tools and methodology to other hybrid organizations placed in between Extreme
I and Extreme II;
• It would also be valuable to understand how the Theory of Change triggers strategic change in
individual initiatives of conglomerates.
28
THANK YOU
Backup
Slides
CONTEXT ANALYSIS
PEST Analysis
Strengths Weaknesses
Internal Analysis
• Strong managing team, fully committed to the organization’s mission and • Lack of funding & high dependency on grants and punctual
the background diversity of the team members; donations;
• Relevance of the projects and awareness towards the population’s needs;
• Managing team working on a volunteering/part-time basis;
• Successful performance record;
• Lack of human resources – members and volunteers;
• Important partnerships and strong network & known initiatives, like Banco
de Fraldas. • Daily tasks are more time-consuming and sometimes ineffective;
• Selected for Fidelidade Comunidade and BPI Senior awards. • Lack of physical materials – e.g. office.
Opportunities Threats
External Analysis
• Portuguese economic growth; • Lack of government funding for social organizations & limited private
financing;
• Increasing awareness towards social issues;
• Large number of NGOs (45.7% of the whole social economy in 2013) and
• Technological progress and the internet have allowed to other social organizations (IPSS, Misericórdias, etc) competing for the same
type of funding (private and public);
reach and attract more volunteers and investors;
• Loss of credibility of third sector organizations due to recent situations of
• Growing demand (demographic factors); corruption;
• Lack of government solutions for the social needs tackled. • Easy to copy initiatives – no “copyrights” protection in the third sector.
Stakeholders Groups
Internal Stakeholders
• Passo Positivo’s internal stakeholders are its members, such as the board
of directors, staff, interns and volunteers.
External Stakeholders Stakeholders who are not
directly connected to the
organization but have a direct
Connected interest in it.
Stakeholders Connected Stakeholders
Individuals taking part of the • Connected stakeholders of Passo Positivo are its partners, suppliers,
Internal Stakeholders organization that directly individual donors, funders, competitors and beneficiaries.
affect and are affected by it.
• Improvement of the
Banco de Fraldas children well-being;
Values Accessibility; neutrality; self-determination; clarity and accuracy; empowerment and training; equality.
Promoting the exercise of the global citizenship by ensuring the safety and well-being of vulnerable people
Vision
and the ones working on situations of crisis.
Ensuring the safety and well-being of vulnerable people or the ones working on situations of crisis and thus
Mission empower them, while mitigating the lack of formal support, in partnership with other institutions, and
impacting the future generations in the context of global citizenship.
Strategic goals are medium- to long-term outcomes that embody the mission’s statement. Objectives are
specific and concrete outcomes an organization aims to achieve in the short-term (one to three years).
• Strengthen internal processes that will allow better communication (internally and
• To each strategic goal, two or Strategic Goal II externally).
more objectives correspond.
• Each objective follows the Strategic Goal III • Empower people so they can exercise their human rights on their daily life.
SMART methodology, meaning
they are specific, measurable,
attainable, relevant and time- • Guarantee the safety and well-being of vulnerable people or the ones working in crisis
limited. Strategic Goal IV situations.
• Each objective will be
attainable through a specific Strategic Goal V • Ensure the scientific basis of Passo Positivo’s work.
activity.
The operational results are the outputs measured by the amount of goods and services provided.
Change can only be effective if organizations start by prioritizing their tasks and main activities. Projects
were prioritized as follows:
2 2.0
1.5 1.5
1 1.0
0.5 0.5
0 0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5
The Strategic Horizons Framework does not add value to organizations like Passo Positivo. As an organization that is still struggling with the main tasks of
the first horizon, targeting Horizons II and II is not a priority, mainly due to lack of funding.
Measures Targets
• At its current state, Passo Positivo is not able to expand to new markets, due to its
Market
strong dependency on external funding. Besides, the existing projects have room for
Development
Diversification future exploitation and new approaches.
• E.g. 1: Passo Positivo charges for its services to individuals and families, based on their
income bracket, and also to insurance companies and public-private entities. House
Markets
Given the context of Passo Positivo, the Ansoff Matrix is not enough to trigger change in its main strategy. Even though it focus on the main strengths of the
organizations, the Ansoff Matrix does not take into account one of the main objectives of social organizations: social impact. It would be interesting to
test the framework individually in each project.
January 18, 2019 42
THE STAKEHOLDER MODEL
The Stakeholder Model prioritizes stakeholders according to their importance level (0 to 5) and
considers the way strategy is contributing for each group of stakeholders.
Level of importance: 3. Suppliers are a component of each service, however, strategy is not
Suppliers designed to satisfy them in full.
Level of importance: 3. The organizational strategy is not completely designed to meet the needs
Society of this group, however, society has its say.
External Government Level of importance: 2. As a private organization, Passo Positivo does not depend on the state.
Stakeholders
Level of importance: 5. Stakeholders with a great level of power, some define the strategy of the
Investors & Donors
organization – BPI and Fidelidade.
Beneficiaries Level of importance: 5. The end purpose of Passo Positivo is to benefit its beneficiaries.
Level of importance: 5. The values that shape the overall strategy are much aligned with the
Employees employees’ values.
Level of importance: 5. The values that shape the overall strategy are much aligned with the
Internal Board of Directors managing team’s values.
Stakeholders
Founders Level of importance: 5.
The Stakeholder Mapping is an interesting tool for organizations positioned in both extremes (I and II) and, if tested, for hybrid organizations
as well. Nonetheless, as these combine income generation with social impact, the Stakeholder Mapping might be too superficial.