You imagine that we simply give orders and country is run
accordingly. You are greatly mistaken Gamal Abdul Nasir Public vs. Private Interventions • Unseen or unwritten economic decisions in private or market sectors are as significant as those in public sector • Fairyland world of pure competition with similar access to resources and burden from obligations • Government make perfect sense, but how to measure a mission that goes beyond profitability to service, justice, equity and regularity of public good Values, ideologies and political distribution • Development is rarely a positive sum game: – Growth or Distribution? Town or country? Large-scale interest or small scale? Formal sector or informal? Export production or import substitution? High technology or low? Capital or labor intensiveness? Producer price incentives or consumer price incentives? Centralized or localized administration? Rewards for this generation or the next? • Policies are frequently made by bureaucrats or tiny group of people in opaque political structure Values, ideologies and political distribution • Official ideologies guiding policy choices ranging from conservative to liberal and radical • Goldsworthy’s Three ‘Thought-worlds’: – Conservative market or authoritarian – Liberal reformist (preferring ameliorative change rather than structural change) – Radical millenarian – radical Commandist Values, ideologies and political distribution Ideological vs. instrumental calculations • Ilchman and Uphoff’s mapping of implicit technique of calculating choices: – Central or Core Actors, privileged and critical to regime – Ideological Supporters – Sectors – Violent opposition – Un-mobilized, with potential to swing the above Values, ideologies and political distribution Politics in Management • Politics considered dirty and avoided by Int. agencies • Nevertheless it expands the possibilities • Problem with who and how many involved rather than with process itself • Politics offers a mechanism to monitor bureaucracy • Politics can mobilize new solution to problems The State • Conceptual handle to expand insights about politics • State officials have authority to govern , they may lack the means to govern, given state weakness or the existence of competing authorities. • State capacity ranges in strength, but it draws on normative, coercive and bureaucratic resources that may surpass those institutions which accumulate private capital The State Regime type – Military versus civilian, democratic, authoritarian, corporatists, or totalitarian – No party, one part, two party or multi part – Presidential vs. Parliamentary system • The dynamics of fixed term, elections competing parties and similar issues have great mention for political decisions to distribute development benefits. • Yet state is not monolith The State Bureaucratic and organizational politics • State officials neither think alike nor share common interests • Each ministry as distinctive political entity in itself • Ministries also compete each other • Distribution of cabinet posts reveal much about the power of ministries The State Bureaucratic interaction with outside world • Do they seek social support? • To what extent government change brings personal change – Patent client ties to recruit and remove personals – Political appointees infuse political agendas – Political change numbers few in British, thousands in US and about 25000 in Mexico – What about Pakistan? The State Inside bureaucracy: horizontal and vertical ties • Theory and practice of policy making • Relationship among ministers and bureaucrats • Guy Peter’s models of political interactions: 1. Formal Model 2. The Village Life Model 3. Functional Model 4. Adversarial Model 5. State model • Political system(s) within any political system • State should be strengthen or the reverse? The State State size and strength • How large is a state? • How much does it consumes? • How the size of state has changed over time? – Public employment has grown 3-4 times faster in DCs and 2-3 times faster than the population at large – Not only number of employees but number of state agencies has also grown • Who counts as state employee The State • Trimming size of state is more than ideological notions of limited government • The issue of the size of state is incomplete without attention to public accountability 10 20 30 40 50 60
1963-64 1966-67 1969-70 1972-73 1975-76 1978-79 1981-82 1984-85 GDP
1987-88 1990-91 1993-94 1996-97 1999-00 2002-03 UK Public Spendings as % o