Table 1.

Volume of NaOH used for KHP titration (mL)

Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3
16.8 16.4 16

Table 2. Volume of NaOH used for Titration of HCl (mL)

Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3
21.3 17.8 19.5

Table 3. Volume of NaOH used for Titration of Wine (mL)

Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3
4.15 3.6 3.05

Table 4. Volume of HCl used for Base Mixture Titration (Vo-ph, mL)
Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3
41.1 36.8 39.7

Table 5. Volume of HCl used for Base Mixture Titration (Vph-mo, mL)
Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3
29.1 18.7 25.3

Table 6. [NaOH] from Standardization using KHP  

  Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3
Mass of KHP, g 0.7229 0.7970 0.7729
Moles of NaOH,
3.5398 3.9027 3.7846
mmol
[NaOH], M 0.2107 0.2380 0.2365

Table 6.1. Mean of The [NaOH], M

  Trial 1, 2, & 3
Mean 0.2284

Table 7. [NaOH] calculated from Weight of NaOH Pellet

Mass of Pellet, g [NaOH], M
 
  4.66 0.1165

Table 8. [HCl] from NaOH titration (0.2248 M NaOH)

Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3
0.1946 0.1626 0.1782

Table 9. [HCl] from NaOH titration (0.1165 M NaOH)

Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3
 0.0993 0.0829 0.0909

Table 10. %Wt of Tartaric Acid (Using 0.2248 M NaOH)

Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3
1.4226 1.2341 1.0456

Table 11. %Wt of Tartaric Acid (Using 0.1165 M NaOH)

Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3
0.7256 0.6295 0.5333

Table 12. Titration of the Base Mixture (0.1785 M HCl)  

  Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3
% Wt of Na2Co3 2.2012 1.4145 1.9138
%Wt of NaOH 0.3426 0.5168 0.4111

Table 13. Titration of the Base Mixture (0.0910 M HCl)

  Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3
% Wt of Na2Co3 1.1228 0.7215 0.9762
%Wt of NaOH 0.1748 0.2636 0.2097

Table 14. Descriptive Statistics of the Desired Values (0.2248 M NaOH, 0.1785 M HCl)

%Wt of Na2CO3, g %Wt of NaOH, g %Wt of C4H6O6, g

 
Mean 1.8432 0.4235 1.2341
Standard
0.3981 0.0877 0.1885
Deviation
Relative Standard
21.60% 20.72% 15.28%
Deviation

Table 15. Descriptive Statistics of the Desired Values (0.1165 M NaOH, 0.0910 M HCl)

%Wt of Na2CO3, g %Wt of NaOH, g %Wt of C4H6O6, g

 
Mean 0.9401 0.2160 0.6295
Standard
0.2030 0.0448 0.0962
Deviation
Relative Standard
21.60% 20.72% 15.28%
Deviation

Results and Analysis

Table 14. Descriptive Statistics of the Desired Values (0.2248 M NaOH, 0.1785 M HCl)
 %Wt of Na2CO3, g %Wt of NaOH, g %Wt of C4H6O6, g
 
Mean 1.8432 0.4235 1.2341
Standard
0.3981 0.0877 0.1885
Deviation
Relative Standard
21.60% 20.72% 15.28%
Deviation

Table 15. Descriptive Statistics of the Desired Values (0.1165 M NaOH, 0.0910 M HCl)

%Wt of Na2CO3, g %Wt of NaOH, g %Wt of C4H6O6, g

 
Mean 0.9401 0.2160 0.6295
Standard
0.2030 0.0448 0.0962
Deviation
Relative Standard
21.60% 20.72% 15.28%
Deviation
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

After the experiment, we noticed during the processing of the data that the concentration of the

NaOH after standardization was done, is 0.2284 M at average (see Table 6.1). It’s far from the expected

concentration which is ~ 0.100 M. In order to analyze the data, there were two sets of calculation done. One

using the concentration of NaOH from the standardization, and one from computing the concentration

through the weight of the pellet used, which is 4.66g, and the concentration of NaOH computed from this is

0.1165 M (see Table 7). After all of the computations, the statistical analysis showed that the set of 0.2248

M NaOH and 0.1785 HCl (see Table 14), has the same descriptive statistics values as the set of 0.1165 M

NaOH and 0.0910 M HCl (see table 15). Table 14 showed the mean for the base mixture; % Wt for Na2Co3

as 1.8432%, %Wt for NaOH as 0.4235%, and for the white wine, %Tartaric acid is 1.2342%. Table 15 on

the other hand, showed the mean for the base mixture; %Wt of Na2CO3 as 0.9401%, %Wt for NaOH as

0.2160%, and % Tartaric acid as 0.6295%. The relative standard deviation for the two tables rendered the

same value, 21.60% RSD for %Wt of Na2CO3, 20.72%RSD for %Wt of NaOH, and 15.28% RSD for %Wt

of Tartaric acid. This shows that the two sets, the one with the higher concentration and the one with the

lower concentration were the same in terms of statistics.

CONCLUSION

The experiment was carried out successfully. There were little mishaps but after going through the

data processing, they were straightened out and the data is clearer. After all of the computations, the

statistical analysis showed that the set of 0.2248 M NaOH and 0.1785 HCl (see Table 14), has the same

descriptive statistics values as the set of 0.1165 M NaOH and 0.0910 M HCl (see table 15). This shows that

the two sets have the same correct proportions and that there was a probable human error that happened

during the standardization of NaOH, that caused the incorrect volume recorded during the titration.